Exploring willingness to use adverse drug reaction reporting systems: a multicentre qualitative study in China based on the technology acceptance model and task-technology fit integration approach.

BACKGROUND: Adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting systems are critical for monitoring and managing drug safety. However, various factors influence the willingness to use these systems. This study aimed to investigate the willingness to use ADR reporting systems through an integrated model of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Task-Technology Fit (TTF) theory, conducting a multicentre qualitative study from the user's perspective. METHODS: This study used qualitative research methods, including in-depth interviews with clinicians, nurses, pharmacists and administrators who reported ADRs through the National Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring System (NADRMS) and the China Hospital Pharmacovigilance System (CHPS). The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using QDA Miner software for data management and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen healthcare workers from five healthcare organisations participated in the study. They found the ease of use and usefulness of the current NADRMS and CHPS to be acceptable. The essential technical requirements identified included accuracy, standardisation, timeliness and confidentiality. However, challenges such as inaccurate information capture, unstable interfacing with medical record systems, low reporting efficiency and lack of data sharing were highlighted. Overall, front-line healthcare workers exhibited a generally negative attitude towards using NADRMS and CHPS, driven more by necessity than preference. Factors influencing their willingness to use these systems included ease of use, practicality, risk perception and social impact, with varying attitudes and requirements observed between user groups. CONCLUSION: This study provides practical recommendations that can be readily implemented to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of ADR reporting systems. While front-line users in China acknowledged the systems' ease of use and usefulness, they also noted significant gaps in technological adaptation. They expressed the need for improvements in data openness and sharing, accessibility and system intelligence.

Do Diagnostic Nerve Blocks Affect the Starting Dose of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for Spasticity? A Case-Control Study.

One of the aims of diagnostic nerve blocks is to identify the overactive muscles that lead to a specific spasticity pattern. However, to date, there is no evidence on how nerve blocks may affect botulinum neurotoxin-A (BoNT-A) dose in patients with spasticity. This case-control study aims to assess the role of diagnostic nerve block in defining BoNT-A starting dose at first treatment. Patients with upper and lower limb spasticity treated for the first time with BoNT-A were retrospectively divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 43) was evaluated with clinical assessment and diagnostic nerve block; Group 2 (n = 56) underwent clinical assessment only. Group 1 was injected with higher BoNT-A doses in some muscles (i.e., flexor digitorum profundus, soleus), and received a higher BoNT-A cumulative dose with a larger number of injected muscles for some spasticity patterns (i.e., "clenched fist", "flexed fingers", "adducted thigh"). Diagnostic nerve block may help the clinician to optimize and personalize the BoNT-A dose since the first BoNT-A treatment.

The impact of a multidisciplinary team intervention on medication prescription in nursing homes in Catalonia.

Background: In response to the rising population of nursing home residents with frailty and multimorbidity, optimizing medication safety through drug utilization review and addressing medication-related problems (MRPs) is imperative. Clinical decision support systems help reduce medication errors and detect potential MRPs, as well as medication reviews performed by a multidisciplinary team, but these combined assessments are not commonly performed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact on medication plans of a multidisciplinary team intervention in nursing homes, by analyzing the medication plan before and after the intervention and assessing whether the recommendations given had been implemented. Methods: A multicenter before-after study, involving five nursing homes, assessed the impact of a multidisciplinary team intervention, to estimate effectiveness related to the review of the prescribed medications. The follow-up period for each patient was 12 months or until death if prior, from July 2020 to February 2022, and involved 483 patients. The clinical pharmacologist coordinated the intervention and reviewed all the prescribed medications to make recommendations, focused on the completion of absent data, withdrawal of a drug, verification of whether a drug was adequate, the substitution of a drug, and the addition of drugs. Since the intervention was performed during the COVID-19 pandemic, optimization of psychotropic drugs and absorbent pads were limited. Results: The intervention had an impact with recommendations given for 398 (82.4%) of the patients and which were followed by 58.5% of them. At least one drug was withdrawn in 293 (60.7%) of the patients, with a mean of 2.3 (SD 1.7). As for the total of 1,097 recommendations given, 355 (32.4%) were followed. From the intervention, antipsychotics, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, statins, and diuretics were the most frequently withdrawn. Conclusion: The findings underscore the impact of targeted interventions to reduce inappropriate medications and enhance medication safety in nursing homes. The proposed recommendations given and followed show the importance of a multidisciplinary team, coordinated by a clinical pharmacologist, for a patient-centered approach to make medication reviews regularly, with the help of clinical decision support systems, to help reduce potential MRPs and polypharmacy.

Cluster B personality disorders and psychotropic medications: a focused analysis of trends and patterns across sex and age groups.

PURPOSE: This study investigated sex and age differences in patterns of psychotropic medication use before and after the initial diagnosis of Cluster B personality disorders (PDs) and analyzed trends over time. METHODS: Analyzing data from the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System for individuals newly diagnosed with Cluster B PD (≥ 14 years) between 2002 and 2018 and under the provincial public drug plan, we calculated yearly and monthly proportions of individuals exposed to psychotropic medications during the year before and after their diagnosis by sex and age. Robust Poisson regression models assessed the association between sex and exposure to psychotropic medications after the diagnosis of Cluster B PD. RESULTS: Among 87,778 individuals with a first Cluster B PD diagnosis (mean age: 44.5 years; 57.5% women), the proportion of users increased post-diagnosis. Notably, after diagnosis, females were more likely to receive psychiatric medications (between 78.9% and 83.7% during the study period vs. 72.8% and 76.8%). Males were less likely than females to receive antidepressants (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR): 0.83; 99% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.85) and anxiolytics (aPR: 0.86; 99%CI: 0.84-0.88), whereas they had higher exposure to antipsychotics (aPR: 1.04; 99%CI: 1.02-1.06) and ADHD medications (aPR: 1.14; 99%CI: 1.07-1.2). Age-specific trends showed increased ADHD medication use among younger patients (14-24 years), and anxiolytic use predominated in those aged ≥ 65 years. CONCLUSIONS: Psychotropic medication use was high among Cluster B PD patients, with differences in medication classes according to age and sex. The marked sex and age differences in psychotropic medication use among Cluster B PD patients underscore the need for a sex-sensitive and age-specific approach in psychiatric care.

Trends in the use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and recently diagnosed colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) are often discontinued when a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is diagnosed with cancer. Our aim was to determine trends in bDMARD utilization in patients with RA and recently diagnosed cancer. METHOD: We examined two national claims databases to identify adults with RA and recently diagnosed colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer (Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database 2008-2022, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) Medicare-linked 2008-2017). We determined time trends in bDMARD and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) prescriptions during the first 3 years after cancer with Cochram-Armitage tests and multivariable logistic regression. Cancer cohorts were analyzed separately. RESULTS: We included 3595 patients in all six cohorts (in Clinformatics® 503 with colorectal, 468 with lung, and 440 with prostate cancer; in SEER-Medicare 580 with colorectal, 1010 with lung, and 594 with prostate cancer). No significant increase was observed in bDMARD or TNFi utilization over time. Overall, use of bDMARD within the first 3 years of follow-up ranged from 16.7% (Clinformatics® lung cohort) to 29.7% (SEER-Medicare colorectal cohort). The major predictor of bDMARD utilization was prior use in the 3 months before cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001 for all cancers) and earlier cancer stage (p < 0.001 in colorectal and lung cancer and p = 0.05 in prostate cancer). CONCLUSIONS: Use of bDMARD in patients with RA and recently diagnosed common cancers has not increased since 2008. Additional evidence on the safety of bDMARD in patients with early cancer is needed to ensure appropriate management of their RA. Key Points • Use of bDMARD and TNFi in patients with RA and early colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer has been stable since 2008, with no significant increases over time. • The major determinant of receiving bDMARD after cancer diagnosis was prior treatment with bDMARD in the prior 3 months before cancer. • Patients with advanced cancer stage and distant metastases were less likely to receive bDMARD and TNFi than those at early stages of disease.

Evaluation of rimegepant utilization patterns and patient characteristics among new users: a United States administrative claims-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess tablet utilization patterns and describe pre-treatment characteristics among new users of rimegepant. BACKGROUND: Rimegepant is the only oral calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist approved in the United States for both the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of people with migraine who initiated treatment with rimegepant using two US commercial claims databases (MarketScan and Optum). Patients (≥18 years old) with migraine who newly initiated rimegepant were included. Patients were stratified into two groups representing acute (quantity = 8) and prevention (quantity = 15 or 16) use cohorts. Baseline characteristics and medication use history were assessed on index and during the 365-day pre-index period. Rimegepant utilization periods were calculated based on days supplied and varying approaches to define use periods. Tablet quantity per 30 days was reported separately for both acute and prevention cohorts. RESULTS: In MarketScan, a total of 14,037 rimegepant users were identified; 11,195 (79.8%) in the acute group and 1,880 (13.4%) in the prevention group. Rimegepant utilization for acute use was 4.9 ± 2.1 tablets per 30 days and for preventive use was 13.1 ± 7.7 tablets per 30 days. There was high baseline prevalence of triptan contraindications, warnings, and high cardiovascular risk, with a combined 46.2% meeting one or more of these criteria. Acute medication overuse was also common (25.1%) prior to rimegepant initiation. Results were consistent in the Optum database. CONCLUSION: Our analysis provides the first real-world data available on tablet utilization and characteristics of new users of rimegepant.

There is little information available on the characteristics of people with migraine who start to use rimegepant, which is the only medicine approved for both the prevention of migraine attacks and the acute treatment of migraine attacks after they have started. Information on new users of rimegepant at least 18 years of age was obtained from two commercial databases of US healthcare claims (MarketScan and Optum). The researchers used this information to evaluate people's age, sex, pre-existing illnesses, and prior use of migraine medications at the time they started using rimegepant, and they also used several different methods to estimate how often people used rimegepant after treatment was started. The MarketScan database contained information on 14,037 people with migraine who started using rimegepant, with this group having an average age of 43 years and being comprised mostly of females (88%). Prior to starting rimegepant, almost half (46%) of the people were considered to have high cardiovascular risk and 25% considered at risk of overusing acute migraine medications. Most of the 14,037 people (80%) who started rimegepant used it to treat migraine attacks after they started and this group used approximately 5 tablets every month. The smaller number of people who used rimegepant to prevent migraine attacks used approximately 13 tablets every month. The information obtained from the Optum database was similar to that obtained from the MarketScan database. The researchers' analysis is the first to describe the characteristics of people with migraine who start to use rimegepant outside the setting of a controlled clinical trial. Their results show that new users of rimegepant represent a complex population with a significant profile of pre-existing illness and a diverse treatment history.

Pharmacoeconomic implications of preference toward reference- versus generic-brand antidepressants in primary care.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of depression is gradually increasing worldwide with an increasing utilization of antidepressants. Nevertheless, despite their lower costs, generic-brand antidepressants were reported to be less prescribed. We aimed to examine the costs of reference- versus generic-brand antidepressant prescriptions in primary care practice. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included electronic prescriptions for adult patients that contained antidepressants (World Health Organization's Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) code: N06A), which were generated by a systematically selected sample of primary care doctors (n = 1431) in Istanbul in 2016. We examined the drug groups preferred, the reference- versus generic-brand status, and pharmacotherapy costs. FINDINGS: The majority of the prescriptions were prescribed for women (71.8%), and the average age of the patients was 53.6 ± 16.2 years. In prescriptions with a depression-related indication (n = 40 497), the mean number and cost of drugs were 1.5 ± 1.0 and 22.7 ± 26.4 United States Dollar ($) per prescription, respectively. In these prescriptions, the mean number and cost of antidepressants per encounter were 1.1 ± 0.2 and $17.0 ± 13.2, respectively. Reference-brand antidepressants were preferred in 58.2% of depression-related prescriptions, where the mean cost per prescription was $18.3 ± 12.4. The mean cost per prescription of the generics, which constituted 41.8% of the antidepressants in prescriptions, was $15.1 ± 11.4. We found that if the generic version with the lowest cost was prescribed instead of the reference-brand, the mean cost per prescription would be $12.9 ± 11.2. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlighted the substantial pharmacoeconomic impact of generic-brand antidepressant prescribing, whose preference over reference-brands could reduce the cost of antidepressant medication treatment by 17.5% in primary care, which could be approximately doubled if the cheapest generic antidepressant had been prescribed.

Weight management medications for chronic use in 37 veterans affairs medical centers-A medication use evaluation.

Rationale: Controlled trials have demonstrated successful weight loss associated with certain weight management medications (WMMs). However, there are limited real-world data on prescribing patterns and efficacy and safety profiles of WMMs in Veterans Affairs (VA) patients. Objective: To evaluate: utilization patterns of WMMs liraglutide, naltrexone/bupropion, orlistat, phentermine, phentermine/topiramate, and semaglutide; weight loss at three, six, twelve, and more than 12 months; safety; and treatment barriers. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional medication use evaluation (MUE) was conducted using electronic health records of outpatient Veterans newly initiated on WMMs at 37 VA Medical Centers between 1 March 2020 and 31 March 2022. Chart review was used to identify WMM utilization and capture rates of clinical response, defined as 5% and 10% or greater weight loss at the final weight, adverse drug events (ADEs), non-adherence, and discontinuations. Site-specific surveys evaluated local practices and barriers. Results: Among 1959 eligible Veterans, semaglutide, phentermine/topiramate, and orlistat were most frequently prescribed. The clinical response was highest among phentermine/topiramate, liraglutide, and semaglutide. Naltrexone/bupropion and phentermine demonstrated the highest and lowest ADE rates, respectively. Potential barriers to WMM utilization and successful treatment by site reports were drug shortages, patient perceptions of therapeutic course, personal preferences, and VA WMM use criteria. Conclusions: Smaller weight loss and higher discontinuation rates were observed relative to clinical trials. The MUE data allow for better assessment of benefits and risks for Veterans prescribed WMMs.

Injectable antibiotic use in India: public-private share in volume and cost.

Background: Consumption of injectable antibiotics is not widely studied, despite injectables constitute a major share of antibiotic cost. This study aimed to understand the share of oral and injectable antibiotic consumption and cost at the national level in India, and the public and private sector shares in the provision and cost of injectables in Kerala state. Methods: We used the PharmaTrac private sector sales dataset and the Kerala Medical Services Corporation public sector procurement dataset. Using WHO Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classifications, we estimated the annual total and per-capita consumption, and the annual total, per defined daily dose (DDD), and per-capita spending on injectables. Results: Although 94.9% of total antibiotics consumed at the national level were oral preparations, 35.8% of total spending were on injectables. In Kerala , around 33% of total antibiotic spending in the private sector were for injectables, compared to around 25% in the public sector. The public sector used fewer injectable antibiotic formulations (n=21) compared the private sector (n=69). The cost per DDD was significantly higher in the private sector as compared to the public sector. Despite only accounting for 6.3% of the cost share, the public sector provided 31.4% of injectables, indicating very high efficiency. Across both sectors, Watch group antibiotics were significantly more consumed and at a significantly higher cost than Access group antibiotics, for example in nearly double the quantity and at 1.75 times the price per DDD in the private sector. Reserve group antibiotics made up the lowest consumption share (0.61% in the private sector), but at the highest cost per DDD (over 16 times that of Access). Conclusions: Public sector showed higher cost efficiency in antibiotic provisioning compared to private sector. Appropriate antibiotic use cannot be achieved through drug price control alone but requires extensive engagement with private providers through structured stewardship programs.

This study tried to understand the share of public and private sectors in the volume and cost of antibiotic injections in India, particularly in the state of Kerala. We used drug sales data (PharmaTrac) and Kerala government procurement data for the analysis. The study was conducted by researchers at Boston University (USA), Public Health Foundation of India (India), Center for Global Development (UK and USA), and INSEAD (France), and was supported by a Wellcome grant. We analysed data using the World Health Organization classification of antibiotics into Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe), which is based on the risk of emergence of resistance. We estimated the annual total and per-capita consumption, and the annual total, per-dose, and per-capita spending on injectables. We found that although antibiotic injections were less than six percent of total antibiotics consumed nationally, they accounted for more than 35% of total spending. Kerala data showed that the public sector showed higher efficiency by providing one-third of antibiotic injection doses using fewer formulations, with only six percent of the cost share. Reserve group antibiotics, which made up the lowest consumption share, had the highest cost per dose (over 16 times that of Access antibiotics). In conclusion, public sector showed higher cost efficiency in injectable antibiotic provisioning compared with private sector. Appropriate antibiotic use requires extensive engagement with private providers through structured stewardship programs.

HIV-1 subtype-specific drug resistance on dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy: protocol for a multicentre study (DTG RESIST).

INTRODUCTION: HIV drug resistance poses a challenge to the United Nation's goal of ending the HIV/AIDS epidemic. The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (InSTI) dolutegravir, which has a higher resistance barrier, was endorsed by the WHO in 2019 for first-line, second-line and third-line antiretroviral therapy (ART). This multiplicity of roles of dolutegravir in ART may facilitate the emergence of dolutegravir resistance. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Nested within the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS (IeDEA), DTG RESIST is a multicentre study of adults and adolescents living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and South and Central America who experienced virological failure on dolutegravir-based ART. At the time of virological failure, whole blood will be collected and processed to prepare plasma or dried blood spots. Laboratories in Durban, Mexico City and Bangkok will perform genotyping. Analyses will focus on (1) individuals who experienced virological failure on dolutegravir and (2) those who started or switched to such a regimen and were at risk of virological failure. For population (1), the outcome will be any InSTI drug resistance mutations, and for population (2) virological failure is defined as a viral load >1000 copies/mL. Phenotypic testing will focus on non-B subtype viruses with major InSTI resistance mutations. Bayesian evolutionary models will explore and predict treatment failure genotypes. The study will have intermediate statistical power to detect differences in resistance mutation prevalence between major HIV-1 subtypes; ample power to identify risk factors for virological failure and limited power for analysing factors associated with individual InSTI drug resistance mutations. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research protocol was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa and the Ethics Committee of the Canton of Bern, Switzerland. All sites participate in International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS and have obtained ethics approval from their local ethics committee to collect additional data. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06285110.

Antibiotic De-Escalation Practices in the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: There is little known about antibiotic de-escalation (ADE) practices in the intensive care unit (ICU). OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the proportion of patients who received ADE within 24 hours of actionable cultures and identify predictors of timely ADE. METHODS: Multicenter cohort study in ICUs of 15 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Adult patients were included if they were started on broad-spectrum antibiotics within 24 hours of ICU admission. The ADE was defined as switching from a broad-spectrum agent to a narrower-spectrum agent or antibiotic cessation. The primary outcome was ADE within 24 hours of an actionable culture, where ADE was possible. RESULTS: The 446 patients included in the study had a mean age of 63 ± 16 years, 60% were male, 32% were mechanically ventilated, and 19% were immunocompromised. Of these, 161 (36.1%) were not eligible for ADE and 37 (8.3%) for whom ADE within 24 hours of actionable culture could not be determined. In the remaining 248 patients, ADE occurred ≤24 hours in 60.5% (n = 150/248) after actionable cultures. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, ADE was less likely to occur within 24 hours for patients with negative cultures (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25-0.92, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Timely ADE may not occur in 40% of patients in the ICU and is less likely to occur in patients with negative cultures. Timely ADE can be improved, and patients with negative cultures should be targeted as part of antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

What do patients with heart failure disclose about medication adherence at home to their hospital and primary care doctors? Exploratory interaction-based observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was twofold: to investigate what kind of information patients with heart failure (HF) tell their doctors about their medication adherence at home, and how often such information is provided in consultations where medication reconciliation is recommended. To meet these objectives, we developed an analysis to recognise, define, and count (1) patient utterances including medication adherence disclosures in clinical interactions (MADICI), (2) MADICI including red-flags for non-adherence, and (3) MADICI initiated by patients without prompts from their doctor. DESIGN: Exploratory interaction-based observational cohort study. Inductive microanalysis of authentic patient-doctor consultations, audio-recorded at three time-points for each patient: (1) first ward visit in hospital, (2) discharge visit from hospital, and (3) follow-up visit with general practitioner (GP). SETTING: Norway (2022-2023). PARTICIPANTS: 25 patients with HF (+65 years) and their attending doctors (23 hospital doctors, 25 GPs). RESULTS: We recognised MADICI by two criteria: (1) they are about medication prescribed for use at home, AND (2) they involve patients' action, experience, or stance regarding medications. Using these criteria, we identified 427 MADICIs in 25 patient trajectories: 143 (34%) at first ward visit (min-max=0-35, median=3), 57 (13%) at discharge visit (min-max=0-8, median=2), 227 (53%) at GP-visit (min-max=2-24, median=7). Of 427 MADICIs, 235 (55%) included red-flags for non-adherence. Bumetanide and atorvastatin were most frequently mentioned as problematic. Patients initiated 146 (34%) of 427 MADICIs. Of 235 'red-flag MADICIs', 101 (43%) were initiated by patients. CONCLUSIONS: Self-managing older patients with HF disclosed information about their use of medications at home, often including red-flags for non-adherence. Patients who disclosed information that signals adherence problems tended to do so unprompted. Such disclosures generate opportunities for doctors to assess and support patients' medication adherence at home.

Real-world evaluation of treatment utilization by women experiencing vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause in the United States and Europe: Findings from the REALISE study.

OBJECTIVES: Despite the profound impact of menopausal symptoms on women, treatment utilization is low, and many seek alternative therapies. The REALISE study aimed to evaluate the treatment landscape - that is, pharmacological treatment, lifestyle changes (LC), and use of over-the-counter (OTC) products - for women from six high-income countries experiencing vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and receiving healthcare. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of a secondary dataset, the Adelphi Real World Disease Specific Programme™, a large, cross-sectional, point-in-time survey conducted in the United States and five European countries (February-October 2020). Physicians provided demographic, clinical, and treatment data; women were stratified by VMS severity (mild; moderate-severe) and presence of concomitant sleep/mood symptoms. Women completed forms on VMS severity, concomitant symptoms, LC, and OTC product use. Two subgroups were identified: VMS-only and VMS + sleep/mood. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prescription treatment, LC, and OTC product utilization. RESULTS: Physicians (n = 233) provided data on 1767 women; 825 (46.7 %) completed a self-completion form. Physicians rated 60 % of women with moderate-severe VMS, of whom 709 (66.8 %) were currently prescribed pharmacological treatment; 27.1 % had never been prescribed. Hormone therapy was most frequently prescribed in the moderate-severe group (overall, 49.8 %; VMS-only, 57.4 %; VMS + sleep/mood, 47.3 %), followed by serotonergic antidepressants (15.7 %; 9.7 %; 17.6 %, respectively). Most women (78.3 %) with moderate-severe VMS adopted LC, and 57.6 % used at least one OTC product for VMS relief. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a third of women with moderate-severe VMS had never received treatment despite access to healthcare. This, combined with the prevalent use of LC/OTC products, suggests an unmet need for new treatment options to manage VMS and concomitant sleep/mood symptoms.

Identification of medication-related fall risk in adults and older adults admitted to hospital: A machine learning approach.

The study aimed to develop and validate, through machine learning, a fall risk prediction model related to prescribed medications specific to adults and older adults admitted to hospital. A case-control study was carried out in a tertiary hospital, involving 9,037 adults and older adults admitted to hospital in 2016. The variables were analyzed using the algorithms: logistic regression, naive bayes, random forest and gradient boosting. The best model presented an area under the curve = 0.628 in the older adult subgroup, compared to an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.776 in the adult subgroup. A specific model was developed for this sample. The gradient boosting model presented the best performance in the sample of older adults (AUC = 0.71). Models developed to predict the risk of falls based on medications specifically aimed at older adults presented better performance in relation to models developed in the total population studied.

Family-centred interventions for people with substance use disorders in low-income and middle-income country settings: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Substance use disorder (SUD) and problematic substance use are global public health concerns with significant multifaceted implications for physical health and psychosocial well-being. The impact of SUD extends beyond the individual to their family while imposing financial and social burdens on the community. Though family-centred interventions have shown promise in addressing SUD, their implementation and impact in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain underexplored. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Per Joanna Briggs Institute's scoping review protocol, a systematic search strategy was employed across OVID Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science-Core Collection, Global Health and CINAHL from 22 February 2024 to 26 February 2024, to identify relevant studies focused on family-centred interventions for SUD in LMIC, devoid of publication time and language constraints. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles, abstracts and full texts, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or third-party reviews. The extracted data charted in a structured form will be visualised by diagrams or tables, focusing on the feasibility and impact of family-centred interventions for SUD in LMIC. For qualitative studies, the findings will be synthesised and presented in thematic clusters, and for studies that report quantitative outcomes, specific health, including SUD and psychosocial, outcomes will be synthesised, aligning with the Population, Concept and Context framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: These data on substance use, psychosocial outcomes and perspectives of individuals with SUD and their families will be presented in narrative format, highlighting patterns and identifying research gaps. This review aims to synthesise the existing evidence on family-centred interventions for improving substance use and/or psychosocial outcomes in individuals with SUD in LMIC and seeks to inform future policy and practice. Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review, and modifications to the review protocol will be disclosed. Findings will be disseminated through conference proceedings and peer-reviewed publication.

The effect of deprescribing interventions on mortality and health outcomes in older people: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Previous systematic reviews suggest that deprescribing may improve survival, particularly in frail older people. Evidence is rapidly accumulating, suggesting a need for an updated review of the literature. METHODS: We updated a 2016 systematic review and meta-analysis to include studies published from inception to 26 April 2024 from specified databases. Studies in which older people had at least one medication deprescribed were included and grouped by study designs and targeted medications. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa tool. Odds ratios (OR) or mean differences were calculated as the effect measures using either the Mantel-Haenszel or generic inverse-variance method with fixed- or random-effects meta-analyses. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were adverse drug withdrawal events, physical health, cognitive function, quality of life and effect on medication regimen. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age and intervention types. RESULTS: A total of 259 studies (reported in 286 papers) were included in this updated review. Deprescribing polypharmacy did not result in a significant reduction in mortality in both randomized (OR 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.09) and non-randomized studies (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.36-1.38). Further subgroup analyses of randomized studies on deprescribing polypharmacy demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality in the young old (aged 65-79) (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and when patient-specific interventions were applied (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Deprescribing can be achieved with potentially important benefits in terms of improved survival, particularly when patient-specific interventions are applied and initiated early in the young old.

[Adherence to treatment in polymedicated patients using Monitored Dosage Systems (MDS) and their impact on health]. / Adherencia al tratamiento en paciente polimedicado con sistemas personalizados de dosificación (SPD) y su impacto en salud.

Monitored Dosage Systems (MDS) are an efficient, reliable and approved device for drug reconditioning in pharmacy. These systems imply a review on proper drug use and the collaboration between primary health care and pharmacists. The case study describes a female patient with a surgical intervention due to lumbosciatica in 2021 and 2022. Patient describes uncontrolled chronic pain and confusion related to improper drug use. During regular dispensing of her medication, these medicine-related problems (MRP) were detected and the patient was referred to the MDS service. After its implementation, the patient's confusion was eliminated and pain management was achieved, increasing her quality of life. As a conclusion, the different health services provided by the pharmacy can improve a patient's quality of life, treatment adherence and MRP detection.

Oncology stewardship practice in the United States: A Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association national survey.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of cancer is associated with high risk for toxicity and high cost. Strategies to enhance the value, quality, and safety of cancer care are often managed independently of one another. Oncology stewardship is a potential framework to unify these efforts and enhance outcomes. This landscape survey establishes baseline information on oncology stewardship in the United States. METHODS: The Hematology/Oncology Pharmacy Association (HOPA) distributed a 38-item survey composed of demographic, institutional, clinical decision-making, support staff, metrics, and technology sections to 675 HOPA members between 9 September 2022 and 9 October 2022. RESULTS: Most organizations (78%) have adopted general pharmacy stewardship practices; however, only 31% reported having established a formalized oncology stewardship team. More than 70% of respondents reported implementation of biosimilars, formulary management, and dose rounding as oncology stewardship initiatives in both inpatient and outpatient settings. Frequently cited barriers to oncology stewardship included lack of clinical pharmacist availability (74%), lack of oncology stewardship training (62%), lack of physician/provider buy-in (32%), and lack of cost-saving metrics (33%). Only 6.6% of survey respondents reported their organization had defined "value in oncology." Lack of a formalized stewardship program was most often cited (77%) as the rationale for not defining value. CONCLUSIONS: Less than one-third of respondents have established oncology stewardship programs; however, most are providing oncology stewardship practices. This manuscript serves as a call to action for stakeholders to work together to formalize oncology stewardship programs that optimize value, quality, and safety for patients with cancer.

Medication reviews by emergency department pharmacists in patients hospitalised for an adverse drug event: a cost study.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost study of pharmacist-led medication reviews in patients with an acute hospitalization for adverse drug events. METHOD: Emergency department pharmacists performed medication reviews in patients hospitalized after visiting the emergency department for an adverse drug event (ADE). Control patients were hospitalized after an emergency department visit not related to an ADE and received usual care. The costs of the intervention were labour costs of the junior emergency department pharmacist and the cost savings consisted of costs of medication that was stopped or reduced during six months after the intervention. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate different scenarios. RESULTS: In the intervention group (n = 104) 113 medication changes led to stopping or reducing medication, accounting for averted costs of €22,850. In the control group (n = 112) 39 medication changes led to stopping or reducing medication, accounting for averted costs of €299. The mean labour costs of the intervention were €138 per patient, resulting in saved costs of €61 per patient per six months. Sensitivity analyses showed that if the intervention would be performed by a senior clinical pharmacist, there are no cost savings (€-21), if parts of the intervention would be executed by pharmacy technicians (e.g. administrative tasks), cost savings would be augmented to €87, if outliers in costs associated with medication reduction would be excluded, there are no cost savings (€-35) and if the costs of reduced medication were extrapolated to one year, cost savings would be €260. CONCLUSION: In this study, medication reviews by junior emergency department pharmacists in patients hospitalized after an emergency department visit for an ADE lead to a cost reduction over a six month period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The main study is registered on the ISRCTN registry with trial ID ISRCTN12506329 on 06-03-2022.

Characteristics of US Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Cough vs. Non-Chronic Cough: 2011-2018.

Background: Chronic cough (CC), characterized as a cough lasting >8 weeks, is a common multi-factorial syndrome in the community, especially in older adults. Methods: Using a pre-existing algorithm to identify patients with CC within the 2011-2018 Medicare beneficiaries, we examined trends in gabapentinoid use through repeated cross-sectional analyses and identified distinct utilization trajectories using group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) in a retrospective cohort study. Individuals without CC but with any respiratory conditions related to cough served as a comparator group. Results: Among patients with CC, gabapentinoid use increased from 18.6% in 2011 to 24.1% in 2018 (p = 0.002), with a similar upward trend observed in the non-CC cohort but with overall lower usage (14.7% to 18.4%; p < 0.001). Patients with CC had significantly higher burdens of respiratory and non-respiratory comorbidities, as well as greater healthcare service and medication use compared to the non-CC cohort. The GBTM analyses identified three distinct gabapentinoid utilization trajectories for CC and non-CC patients: no use (77.3% vs. 84.5%), low use (13.9% vs. 10.3%), and high use (8.8% vs. 5.2%). Conclusions: Future studies are needed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of gabapentinoid use in patients with refractory or unexplained CC in real-world settings.