Renal Amyloidosis in a Child with Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Due to a Novel Variant in COL7A1 Gene.

Secondary amyloidosis may complicate inherited dermatoses, but recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) complicated by renal amyloidosis is rare. We report a case of a 12-year-old male child with RDEB presenting with progressive generalized anasarca for 20 days. Kidney biopsy showed diffuse expansion of mesangial matrix by pale acellular Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS)-negative amorphous material, which was congophilic on Congo red stain and gave apple green birefringence on polarization and extending along the glomerular basement membrane, suggestive of amyloidosis. Genetic analysis showed a compound heterozygous pathogenic variant in the COL7A1 gene with autosomal recessive inheritance.

Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated exon skipping for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

Gene therapy based on the CRISPR/Cas9 system has emerged as a promising strategy for treating the monogenic fragile skin disorder recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). With this approach problematic wounds could be grafted with gene edited, patient-specific skin equivalents. Precise gene editing using homology-directed repair (HDR) is the ultimate goal, however low efficiencies have hindered progress. Reframing strategies based on highly efficient non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair aimed at excising dispensable, mutation-harboring exons offer a promising alternative approach for restoring the COL7A1 open reading frame. To this end, we employed an exon skipping strategy using dual single guide RNA (sgRNA)/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) targeted at three novel COL7A1 exons (31, 68, and 109) containing pathogenic heterozygous mutations, and achieved exon deletion rates of up to 95%. Deletion of exon 31 in both primary human RDEB keratinocytes and fibroblasts resulted in the restoration of type VII collagen (C7), leading to increased cellular adhesion in vitro and accurate C7 deposition at the dermal-epidermal junction in a 3D skin model. Taken together, we extend the list of COL7A1 exons amenable to therapeutic deletion. As an incidental finding, we find that long-read Nanopore sequencing detected large on-target structural variants comprised of deletions up to >5 kb at a frequency of ~10%. Although this frequency may be acceptable given the high rates of intended editing outcomes, our data demonstrate that standard short-read sequencing may underestimate the full range of unexpected Cas9-mediated editing events.

Increased healthcare burden and comorbidity risks of pediatric patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: Analysis of Nationwide Emergency Department Sample 2015-2019.

BACKGROUND: Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) describes a rare genetic blistering disorder characterized by fragile skin. This study aimed to classify the frequency, demographics, cost, and comorbidities associated with emergency department (ED) visits due to DEB. METHODS: The Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) was analyzed for pediatric (age <18) ED visits from 2015 to 2019. DEB was identified with ICD-10-CM code Q81.2. Weighted frequency, prevalence, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of comorbidities were determined among ED visits with and without a DEB diagnosis. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2019, 53 (weighted 242) cases of DEB among 27,223,220 pediatric ED visits were captured. Patients with DEB were more likely to visit the ED in summer compared with those without a diagnosis of DEB (35.7% vs. 21.4%, P < .05). More than half of patients with DEB were admitted to the hospital (56.2%, 95% CI: 39.3-72.5, P < .001) versus only 3.4% (95% CI: 3.1-3.7) of other patients. For ED visits with a secondary DEB diagnosis, the top three primary diagnoses were fever, constipation, and bone marrow transplant aftercare. Patients with DEB had higher rates of hypertension, cellulitis, sepsis, acute and chronic kidney injury, esophageal obstruction, gastroesophageal reflux disease, cardiomyopathy, and anxiety, compared to patients without DEB (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: DEB is a complex blistering disorder with multisystemic manifestations. Patients with DEB have significantly higher admission rates and commonly present with infectious or gastrointestinal complications. Understanding the features of ED visits due to DEB can better prepare healthcare teams and improve patient outcomes.

Citrullinated Histone H3, a Marker for Neutrophil Extracellular Traps, Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Developing in Patients with Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa.

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a rare severe hereditary skin disease characterized by skin and mucosa fragility, resulting in blister formation. The most severe complication in RDEB patients is the development of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), leading to premature death. There is a great deal of evidence suggesting a permissive tumor microenvironment (TME) as a driver of SCC development in RDEB patients. In a cohort of RDEB patients, we characterized the immune profiles of RDEB-SCCs and compared them with clinical, histopathological, and prognostic features. RDEB-SCCs were subdivided into four groups based on their occurrence (first onset or recurrences) and grading according to clinical, histopathological parameters of aggressiveness. Thirty-eight SCCs from 20 RDEB patients were analyzed. Five RDEB patients experienced an unfavorable course after the diagnosis of the first SCC, with early recurrence or metastasis, whereas 15 patients developed multiple SCCs without metastasis. High-risk primary RDEB-SCCs showed a higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the tumor microenvironment and an increased proportion of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Additionally, citrullinated histone H3, a marker of NETs, was increased in the serum of RDEB patients with high-risk primary SCC, suggesting that this modified form of histone H3 may serve as a potential blood marker of unfavorable prognosis in RDEB-SCCs.

Unveiling the value of C-reactive protein as a severity biomarker and the IL4/IL13 pathway as a therapeutic target in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: A multiparametric cross-sectional study.

Patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) experience numerous complications, which are exacerbated by inflammatory dysregulation and infection. Understanding the immunological mechanisms is crucial for selecting medications that balance inflammation control and immunocompetence. In this cross-sectional study, aiming to identify potential immunotherapeutic targets and inflammatory biomarkers, we delved into the interrelationship between clinical severity and systemic inflammatory parameters in a representative RDEB cohort. Encompassing 84 patients aged 1-67 and spanning all three Epidermolysis Bullosa Disease Activity and Scarring Index (EBDASI) severity categories, we analysed the interrelationship of infection history, standard inflammatory markers, systemic cytokines and Ig levels to elucidate their roles in RDEB pathophysiology. Our findings identify C-reactive protein as an excellent biomarker for disease severity in RDEB. A type 2 inflammatory profile prevails among moderate and severe RDEB patients, correlating with dysregulated circulating IgA and IgG. These results underscore the IL4/IL13 pathways as potential evidence-based therapeutic targets. Moreover, the complete inflammatory scenario aligns with Staphylococcus aureus virulence mechanisms. Concurrently, abnormalities in IgG, IgE and IgM levels suggest an immunodeficiency state in a substantial number of the cohort's patients. Our results provide new insights into the interplay of infection and immunological factors in the pathogenesis of RDEB.

Regenerative medicine in the treatment of specific dermatologic disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to systematically review randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) studying various types of regenerative medicine methods (such as platelet-rich plasma, stromal vascular fraction, cell therapy, conditioned media, etc.) in treating specific dermatologic diseases. Rejuvenation, scarring, wound healing, and other secondary conditions of skin damage were not investigated in this study. METHOD: Major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were meticulously searched for RCTs up to January 2024, focusing on regenerative medicine interventions for specific dermatologic disorders (such as androgenetic alopecia, vitiligo, alopecia areata, etc.). Key data extracted encompassed participant characteristics and sample sizes, types of regenerative therapy, treatment efficacy, and adverse events. RESULTS: In this systematic review, 64 studies involving a total of 2888 patients were examined. Women constituted 44.8% of the study population, while men made up 55.2% of the participants, with an average age of 27.64 years. The most frequently studied skin diseases were androgenetic alopecia (AGA) (45.3%) and vitiligo (31.2%). The most common regenerative methods investigated for these diseases were PRP and the transplantation of autologous epidermal melanocyte/keratinocyte cells, respectively. Studies reported up to 68.4% improvement in AGA and up to 71% improvement in vitiligo. Other diseases included in the review were alopecia areata, melasma, lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (LSA), inflammatory acne vulgaris, chronic telogen effluvium, erosive oral lichen planus, and dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Regenerative medicine was found to be an effective treatment option in all of these studies, along with other methods. The regenerative medicine techniques investigated in this study comprised the transplantation of autologous epidermal melanocyte/keratinocyte cells, isolated melanocyte transplantation, cell transplantation from hair follicle origins, melanocyte-keratinocyte suspension in PRP, conditioned media injection, a combination of PRP and basic fibroblast growth factor, intravenous injection of mesenchymal stem cells, concentrated growth factor, stromal vascular fraction (SVF), a combination of PRP and SVF, and preserving hair grafts in PRP. CONCLUSION: Regenerative medicine holds promise as a treatment for specific dermatologic disorders. To validate our findings, it is recommended to conduct numerous clinical trials focusing on various skin conditions. In our study, we did not explore secondary skin lesions like scars or ulcers. Therefore, assessing the effectiveness of this treatment method for addressing these conditions would necessitate a separate study.

Histological and molecular restoration of type VII collagen in Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa mouse skin by topical injection of keratinocyte-like cells differentiated from human adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells.

BACKGROUND: Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a severe skin fragility disorder caused by mutations in the COL7A1 gene, which encodes type VII collagen (COL7), the main constituent of anchoring fibrils for attaching the epidermis to the dermis. Persistent skin erosions frequently result in intractable ulcers in RDEB patients. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (AD-MSCs) are easily harvested in large quantities and have low immunogenicity. Therefore, they are suitable for clinical use, including applications involving allogeneic cell transplantation. Keratinocyte-like cells transdifferentiated from AD-MSCs (KC-AD-MSCs) express more COL7 than undifferentiated AD-MSCs and facilitate skin wound healing with less contracture. Therefore, these cells can be used for skin ulcer treatment in RDEB patients. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether KC-AD-MSCs transplantation ameliorated the RDEB phenotype severity in the grafted skin of a RDEB mouse model (col7a1-null) on the back of the immunodeficient mouse. METHODS: KC-AD-MSCs were intradermally injected into the region surrounding the skin grafts, and this procedure was repeated after 7 days. After a further 7-day interval, the skin grafts were harvested. RESULTS: Neodeposition of COL7 and generation of anchoring fibrils at the dermal-epidermal junction were observed, although experiments were based on qualitative. CONCLUSION: KC-AD-MSCs may correct the COL7 insufficiency, repair defective/reduced anchoring fibrils, and improve skin integrity in RDEB patients.

Twin Prime Editing Mediated Exon Skipping/Reinsertion for Restored Collagen VII Expression in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa.

Gene editing nucleases, base editors, and prime editors are potential locus-specific genetic treatment strategies for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa; however, many recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa COL7A1 pathogenic nucleotide variations (PNVs) are unique, making the development of personalized editing reagents challenging. A total of 270 of the ∼320 COL7A1 epidermolysis bullosa PNVs reside in exons that can be skipped, and antisense oligonucleotides and gene editing nucleases have been used to create in-frame deletions. Antisense oligonucleotides are transient, and nucleases generate deleterious double-stranded DNA breaks and uncontrolled mixtures of allele products. We developed a twin prime editing strategy using the PEmax and recently evolved PE6 prime editors and dual prime editing guide RNAs flanking COL7A1 exon 5. Prime editing-mediated deletion of exon 5 with a homozygous premature stop codon was achieved in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa fibroblasts, keratinocytes, and induced pluripotent stem cells with minimal double-stranded DNA breaks, and collagen type VII protein was restored. Twin prime editing can replace the target exon with recombinase attachment sequences, and we exploited this to reinsert a normal copy of exon 5 using the Bxb1 recombinase. These findings demonstrate that twin prime editing can facilitate locus-specific, predictable, in-frame deletions and sequence replacement with few double-stranded DNA breaks as a strategy that may enable a single therapeutic agent to treat multiple recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa patient cohorts.

Practical considerations relevant to treatment with the gene therapy beremagene geperpavec-svdt for dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB), a rare genetic skin disease caused by loss-of-function mutations in COL7A1, the gene encoding type VII collagen (COL7), is characterized by skin blistering, scarring, and extracutaneous manifestations that markedly reduce patient quality-of-life. Beremagene geperpavec-svdt ('B-VEC') is a gene therapy employing a non-integrating, replication-defective herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)-based vector encoding two copies of full-length human COL7A1 to restore COL7 protein after topical administration to DEB wounds. B-VEC was approved in the United States in 2023 as the first topical gene therapy and the first approved treatment for DEB. However, few providers have experience with use of this gene therapy. METHODS: Data was obtained through literature review and the experience of providers who participated in the B-VEC clinical study or initiated treatment after B-VEC approval. RESULTS: This review discusses the burden of disease, describes the clinical trial outcomes of B-VEC, and provides physician and patient/caregiver recommendations as a practical guide for the real-world use of B-VEC, which can be administered in-office or at the patient's home. CONCLUSIONS: By continuing to optimize the practical aspects of B-VEC administration, the focus will continue to shift to patient-centric considerations and improved patient outcomes.

Functional genotype-phenotype associations in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

BACKGROUND: Genotype-phenotype associations in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) have been difficult to elucidate. OBJECTIVE: To investigate RDEB genotype-phenotype associations and explore a functional approach to genotype classification. METHODS: Clinical examination and genetic testing of RDEB subjects, including assessment of clinical disease by RDEB subtype and extent of blistering. Genotypes were evaluated according to each variant's effect on type VII collagen function per updated literature and subsequently categorized by degree of impact on VII collagen function as low-impact (splice/missense, missense/missense), medium-impact (premature termination codon [PTC]/missense, splice/splice), and high-impact (PTC/PTC, PTC/splice). Genotype-phenotype associations were investigated using Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests, and age-adjusted regressions. RESULTS: Eighty-three participants were included. High-impact variants were associated with worse RDEB subtype and clinical disease, including increased prevalence of generalized blistering (55.6% for low-impact vs 72.7% medium-impact vs 90.4% high-impact variants, P = .002). In age-adjusted regressions, participants with high-impact variants had 40.8-fold greater odds of squamous cell carcinoma compared to low-impact variants (P = .02), and 5.7-fold greater odds of death compared to medium-impact variants (P = .05). LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional design. CONCLUSION: Functional genotype categories may stratify RDEB severity; high-impact variants correlated with worse clinical outcomes. Further validation in larger cohorts is needed.

Unravelling drivers of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is an umbrella term for a group of rare inherited skin disorders characterised by mucocutaneous fragility. Patients suffer from blisters and chronic wounds that arise spontaneously or following minor mechanical trauma, often resulting in inflammation, scarring and fibrosis due to poor healing. The recessive form of dystrophic EB (RDEB) has a particularly severe phenotype and is caused by mutations in the COL7A1 gene, encoding the collagen VII protein, which is responsible for adhering the epidermis and dermis together. One of the most feared and devastating complications of RDEB is the development of an aggressive form of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), which is the main cause of mortality in this patient group. However, pathological drivers behind the development and progression of RDEB-associated cSCC (RDEB-cSCC) remain somewhat of an enigma, and the evidence to date points towards a complex process. Currently, there is no cure for RDEB-cSCC, and treatments primarily focus on prevention, symptom management and support. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive understanding of this cancer's pathogenesis, with the aim of facilitating the discovery of drug targets. This review explores the current knowledge of RDEB-cSCC, emphasising the important role of the immune system, genetics, fibrosis, and the tumour-promoting microenvironment, all ultimately intricately interconnected.

Descriptive Study of the Clinical and Molecular Features of Epidermolysis Bullosa Patients in a Romanian European Reference Network-Skin Affiliated Reference Center.

BACKGROUND: During the last 10 years, in Romania, progress has been made for the welfare of patients suffering from epidermolysis bullosa (EB). In five university hospitals, affiliated with the National Program for the Treatment of Rare Diseases, highly trained specialists diagnose and treat patients with this rare condition. Regarding diagnosis, limitations still exist as immunofluorescence mapping and molecular genetic analysis are not accessible, and generally not reimbursed. Our objective is to present the experience in diagnosing EB patients at Colentina Clinical Hospital, highlighting genotype-phenotype correlations observed in our cohort of patients. METHODS: The records of the patients enrolled between 2012 and 2024 were analyzed considering clinical aspects, and, when available, immunofluorescence mapping, transmission electron microscopy, and genetic molecular analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were identified, of whom 31 cases were of dystrophic EB, three were of junctional EB, and 11 were of simplex EB. For 11 cases, the EB type could not be determined. Regarding EB simplex, two patients with KRT5 mutations and three patients with KRT14 mutations with various clinical expressions, from mild phenotype to severe forms, were identified. Three severe junctional EB patients were registered in our database and for one of the patients, two previously unreported mutations in the LAMA3 gene were identified. Regarding dystrophic EB, 31 cases were identified, of which 25 were recessive dystrophic cases and six were dominant dystrophic cases. Molecular genetic testing was performed for 15 patients, and the most common variant was c.425A>G, identified in six cases. DISCUSSIONS: Two previously unreported mutations were identified, namely, COL7A1 c.5416G>C, a heterozygous missense variant in a patient with a mild phenotype, mainly with nail involvement, and COL7A1 c.5960del, a variant that generates a frameshift in exon 72 resulting in a premature stop codon; this variant was identified in two siblings with a severe recessive dystrophic. CONCLUSION: Important steps have been made in identifying the correct and complete diagnosis, as well as the characterization of EB patients addressing our reference center. The findings underscore the pivotal role of molecular genetic testing in confirming diagnoses and elucidating inheritance patterns, especially in cases with atypical presentations or de novo mutations.

Therapies for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: a systematic review of 157 cases.

BACKGROUND: Invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC) are a leading cause of death in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB), a rare blistering genodermatosis. Outcomes of RDEB-cSCC therapies have primarily been described in case reports. Systematic studies are scarce. This systematic review aims to assess the pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of RDEB-cSCCs, with a focus on results and mechanisms of recent immunotherapies and anti-EGFR treatments. RESULTS: A systematic literature search of epidermolysis bullosa and cSCC was performed in February 2024, using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EudraCT databases. Cases with administration of systematic therapies and unpublished outcomes regarding death were tracked with corresponding authors. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed by two independent reviewers. Of 1132 references in the original search, 163 relevant articles were identified, representing 59 case reports, 7 cohort studies, 49 abstracts, 47 in-vitro/in-vivo experiments, and 1 bioinformatic study. From these, 157 cases of RDEB-cSCCs were included. The majority of RDEB-cSCCs were well-differentiated (64.1%), ulcerated (59.6%), and at least 2 cm in size (77.6%), with a median age at diagnosis of 30 years old (range 6-68.4). Surgery was the primary form of treatment (n = 128), followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Anti-EGFR therapy and immunotherapy was also reported beginning in 2009 and 2019, respectively. Survival time from first cSCC diagnosis to death was available in 50 cases. When stratified by their treatment regimen, median survival time was 1.85 years (surgery + chemotherapy, n = 6), 2 years (surgery only, n = 19), 4.0 years (+ anti-EFGR therapy, n = 10), 4 years (surgery + radiotherapy, n = 9), 4.6 years (+ immunotherapy, n = 4), and 9.5 years (surgery + chemotherapy + radiotherapy; n = 2). Treatment-related adverse events were primarily limited to impaired wound healing for immunotherapies and nausea and fatigue for anti-EGFR therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the challenges of a limited sample size in a rare disease, this systematic review provides an overview of treatment options for cSCCs in RDEB. When surgical treatment options have been exhausted, the addition of immunotherapy and/or anti-EGFR therapies may extend patient survival. However, it is difficult to attribute extended survival to any single treatment, as multiple therapeutic modalities are often used to treat RDEB-cSCCs.

Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (DEB): How Can Pregnancy Alter the Course of This Rare Disease? An Updated Literature Review on Obstetrical Management with an Additional Italian Experience.

Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB) is an extremely rare and disabling inherited genetic skin disease with a predisposition to develop bullous lesions on the skin and inner mucous membranes, occurring after mild friction or trauma, or even spontaneously. Within the spectrum of EB forms, dystrophic EB (DEB) represents the most intriguing and challenging in terms of clinical management, especially with regard to pregnancy, due to the highly disabling and life-threatening phenotype. Disappointingly, in the literature little focus has been directed towards pregnancy and childbirth in DEB patients, resulting in a lack of sound evidence and guidance for patients themselves and clinicians. The current study aims to contribute to the DEB literature with an updated summary of the existing evidence regarding the obstetrical and anesthesiological management of this rare disease. Furthermore, this literature review sought to answer the question of whether, and if so, in which way, the pregnancy condition may alter the course of the underlying dermatologic skin disease. Having all this information is indispensable when counseling a patient with DEB who desires a child or is expecting one. Finally, we reported own experience with a pregnant woman with a recessive DEB whom we recently managed, with a favorable outcome.

Bone marrow transplantation and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy in epidermolysis bullosa: A systematic review.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a genodermatosis that lacks effective treatments and requires supportive care for its severe, life-threatening manifestations. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and its derived cells have been suggested to improve clinical symptoms and quality of life. A comprehensive search was conducted for publications evaluating BMT and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (BM-MSC) therapy for EB in PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases from inception until June 2023. A total of 55 participants with severe forms of EB had BMT and/or BM-MSCs, with recessive dystrophic EB as the most common EB type; 53 (96.4%) patients had better wound healing, and 3 (5.5%) patients died of sepsis. The most common adverse events reported were graft failure, sepsis, graft-versus-host disease, and renal insufficiency. Allogeneic BMT is a high-risk procedure with possible benefits and adverse events. BM-MSCs revealed favorable outcomes to improve the safety of EB cell-based therapy by minimizing the risk of serious adverse events, reducing blisters, and accelerating wound healing. Further studies are needed to assess the treatment's long-term effects and clarify the risk/benefit ratio of procedure versus conventional therapy.

"Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa" and "Epidermolysis Bullosa Burden of Disease": Italian translation, cultural adaptation, and pilot testing of two disease-specific questionnaires.

BACKGROUND: Inherited epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of skin fragility disorders characterized by blister formation following minor trauma. Four major types are distinguished based on the level of cleavage within the skin. Most EB forms present severely disabling cutaneous and systemic signs and symptoms. Management relies on daily time-consuming and distressing topical medications, and symptomatic treatment of systemic findings. Disease manifestations, symptoms, and daily care strongly affect patient and caregiver quality of life (QoL). To date, there are two validated EB-specific questionnaires, the "Quality of Life in Epidermolysis Bullosa" (QOLEB) and the "Epidermolysis Bullosa Burden of Disease" (EB-BoD) for the evaluation of patient and family disease burden, respectively. The aim of our study was to develop an Italian translation of the two questionnaires and to pilot-test them. METHODS: The guidelines for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of health-related QoL measures were followed. Initially, two separate translations were generated for each questionnaire, and subsequently reconciled by an expert committee. This was followed by a back-translation process. The original texts and all translations underwent revision by the expert committee, resulting in definitive versions. The final versions were then tested in a pilot study involving cognitive debriefing in a group of 17 families, representative of all EB major types. RESULTS: The translation and reconciliation process led to minor changes to obtain semantic/idiomatic/cultural equivalence of the Italian versions with the original ones and to reconcile the questions with the answer options. The cognitive debriefing process showed a good understanding and did not require text modifications. CONCLUSIONS: The Italian versions of the QOLEB and EB-BoD provide valuable tools in everyday clinical practice of reference centers, and they allow the participation in multicenter international real-life observational studies as well as in controlled clinical trials. They enable the identification of disease-specific psychological and socioeconomic challenges for EB patients and their families, guiding targeted interventions to ensure appropriate and timely care.

Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4-Mediated Fibronectin Processing Evokes a Profibrotic Extracellular Matrix.

Fibronectin serves as a platform to guide and facilitate deposition of collagen and fibrillin microfibrils. During development of fibrotic diseases, altered fibronectin deposition in the extracellular matrix (ECM) is generally an early event. After this, dysregulated organization of fibrillins and fibrillar collagens occurs. Because fibronectin is an essential orchestrator of healthy ECM, perturbation of its ECM-organizational capacity may be involved in development of fibrosis. To investigate this, we employed recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa as a disease model with progressive, severe dermal fibrosis. Fibroblasts from donors with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa in 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional cultures displayed dysregulated fibronectin deposition. Our analyses revealed that increase of profibrotic dipeptidyl peptidase-4-positive fibroblasts coincides with altered fibronectin deposition. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors normalized deposition of fibronectin and subsequently of fibrillin microfibrils and collagen I. Intriguingly, proteomics and inhibitor and mutagenesis studies disclosed that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 modulates ECM deposition through the proteolysis of the fibronectin N-terminus. Our study provides mechanistic insights into the observed profibrotic activities of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 and extends the understanding of fibronectin-guided ECM assembly in health and disease.

Practical Tips on Epidermolysis Bullosa for Caregivers: Part 2.

The heritable condition epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare but potentially devastating and life-threatening condition that is characterized primarily by cutaneous fragility, manifested when the dermis and epidermis fail to adhere properly. EB has no cure, and because of its rarity, few healthcare professionals have experience in treating it. Most families with an EB child are forced to rely on family caregiving which can be disruptive to family routines but, more importantly, place enormous time and emotional and financial burdens on the family. EB can be extremely painful, and families are often caught in the bind of trying to manage overwhelming financial burdens in an effort to help their children cope with excruciating pain. For many years, the nonprofit organization NoBabyBlisters.org has worked on five continents with families caring for EB children. Many of these families reside in under-developed nations with hot climates and limited healthcare resources. Over time, the healthcare professionals with NoBabyBlisters.org have worked with EB families both internationally and in the United States to develop a series of simple tips or "hacks" that may provide relief or great benefit to these children. The objective of this article is to share these field-tested tips with a wider audience. This is not a scientific study or a systematic review and is offered as a companion article to an earlier article on the same subject.