Foslevodopa/foscarbidopa (LDp/CDp) in advanced Parkinson's Disease (aPD): demonstration of savings from a societal perspective in the UK.

AIMS: In advanced Parkinson's disease (aPD), adequate 24-hour control of OFF-time may not be achievable using oral/transdermal therapies. Clinical trials of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa (LDp/CDP) demonstrate meaningful reductions in OFF-time and OFF-related sleep disturbance in aPD. Previous analyses have only considered direct medical costs: this analysis considers a broader societal perspective (direct non-medical costs, informal care, loss of earnings, productivity and tax). METHODS: Inputs for the societal impact model were taken from a cost-utility model comparing LDp/CDp with best medical treatment (BMT), accepted by the UK National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Quintiles of normalized OFF-time across a 16-hour waking day in each treatment group were applied to literature-based estimates for direct medical, non-medical and indirect costs. The resulting state-specific cost estimates were applied to the modelled aPD patient population. RESULTS: The model estimates the potential UK population for LDp/CDp at 17,505. Continuous 24-hour delivery of LDp/CDp results in greater time spent in in OFF-time states 0-1 (0-4 hours of OFF-time/16-hour waking day) vs BMT alone. Net savings if all eligible patients receive LDp/CDp are £79.1M in year 1, £235.4M in year 2, rising to £262.2M in year 3, declining to £222.9M in year 4 and £153.7M in year 5 as disease progresses and efficacy of LDp/CDp declines, Estimated total net savings are £953M after 5 years. Results are robust in scenario analyses (excluding costs of excessive sleepiness, earnings loss, productivity and tax loss). LIMITATIONS: A NICE-accepted model was used as the economic modelling basis for the societal impact model, however, much of the data was derived from Adelphi datasets, with the potential for inconsistent definitions. CONCLUSION: When considered from a societal perspective, the use of LDp/CDp in aPD patients inadequately controlled on oral therapy, is associated with net healthcare and societal annual savings of over £79.1M vs BMT.

Subcutaneous foslevodopa in akinetic crisis. A case report from the neurological intensive care unit.

Introduction: Akinetic crisis is a severe deterioration of motor performance occurring in syndromes with pre- or postsynaptic dopaminergic deficit, necessitating effective dopamine replacement therapy. The subcutaneously applicable levodopa derivative foslevodopa represents a new therapeutic option for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease as a continuous therapy. However, its potential role as a parenteral treatment option for akinetic crisis has not been investigated, yet. The case: A 78 year-old patient who had developed akinetic-rigid symptomatology in the context of normal pressure hydrocephalus was admitted to our intensive care unit after experiencing an acute exacerbation of akinesia in the context of pulmonary infection. Off-label administration of subcutaneous foslevodopa was initiated after repeated failures to insert a gastric tube for enteral application of levodopa and contraindications against amantadine and apomorphine. Results: Following the administration of a subcutaneous test dose, continuous application of foslevodopa via a B. Braun syringe pump was gradually increased to 0.3 mL/h during the daytime and 0.15 mL/h at night, corresponding to a levodopa equivalent dosage of 1,020 mg/d. This was accompanied by an improvement of the MDS-UPDRS III score from 85 points to 59 points after 72 h. Discussion: Treatment of an akinetic crisis with subcutaneous foslevodopa in an intensive care unit setting has proven to be safe and effective in a patient with acute akinesia associated with dopamine-sensitive hydrocephalus. Due to the pathophysiological distinction from Parkinson's disease, there may be differences in therapeutic response and side effects. Nevertheless, the method used here can serve as a protocol basis for the treatment of akinetic crises with foslevodopa in general and as a starting point for further research.

Continuous Subcutaneous Foslevodopa-Foscarbidopa in Parkinson's Disease: A Mini-Review of Current Scope and Future Outlook.

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms, primarily because of the impairment of dopaminergic neurons. Long-term use of levodopa, the standard PD treatment, often results in fluctuating therapeutic effects and dyskinesia, necessitating alternative therapies. OBJECTIVES: This review aims to synthesize current insights and clinical experiences with foslevodopa-foscarbidopa, focusing on its pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety profile, to evaluate its potential in transforming PD therapy. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted up to November 2023 using databases PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The search yielded eight eligible articles, including pharmacological studies, case reports, observational studies, and controlled trials. No language restrictions were applied. RESULTS: Foslevodopa and foscarbidopa, as prodrugs of levodopa and carbidopa, exhibited excellent chemical stability and solubility, facilitating continuous subcutaneous infusion. Clinical trials demonstrated that these prodrugs maintain stable levodopa levels, thereby addressing the limitations of oral levodopa therapy. Phase 1 and 3 studies indicated significant improvements in motor function and quality of life in advanced PD patients. However, a higher incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, mainly infusion site reactions, was observed compared to oral therapies. CONCLUSIONS: Foslevodopa-foscarbidopa emerges as a promising alternative for advanced PD treatment, offering sustained symptom control. Its efficacy in managing motor fluctuations and dyskinesia makes it a viable option in the PD therapeutic spectrum. Future research should focus on long-term safety, economic impact, and broader accessibility. Foslevodopa-foscarbidopa is now commercially distributed in many countries in Europe and in Japan.

Subcutaneous Levodopa: A New Engine for the Vintage Molecule.

The management of Parkinson's disease (PD) continues to evolve with advancements in non-oral levodopa-based therapies aiming to provide continuous drug delivery (CDD). Such therapies address the challenges posed by the emergence of motor fluctuations, dyskinesias, and non-motor fluctuations (NMF) associated with oral levodopa administration and contributing to define the advanced stage of PD. The key focus of this review is placed on subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa (Foslevodopa/foscarbidopa) infusion, showcasing its recent clinical availability and efficacy in providing continuous levodopa delivery. While providing an overview of the other non-oral levodopa-based CDD systems, such as intrajejunal levodopa-carbidopa infusion and levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa infusion, we highlight the current promising evidence for Foslevodopa/foscarbidopa to improve, for example, "on time" without troublesome dyskinesia and reducing "off time" in people with advanced PD. Additionally, Foslevodopa/foscarbidopa demonstrates potential in managing early morning off periods, sleep quality and other motor and non-motor symptoms. Moreover, other non-oral CDD options such as ND0612 and DIZ102/DIZ101 are discussed, with focus on their pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety profiles. While these advancements present new therapeutic avenues, long-term observational studies are warranted to elucidate their impact on existing PD therapies. Overall, this review provides insights into the evolving landscape of non-oral CDD therapies and offers a pragmatic approach for their integration into clinical practice.

Metabolite profiling of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa in plasma of healthy human participants by LC-HRMS indicates no major differences compared to administration of levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel.

Analysis was conducted to compare levodopa/carbidopa pharmacokinetics and drug-related material in plasma of healthy participants after receiving a continuous infusion of Levodopa/Carbidopa Intestinal Gel (LCIG) to a continuous subcutaneous infusion of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa. Study samples were from a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study in 20 healthy participants. Participants received either 24-h foslevodopa/foscarbidopa SC infusion to the abdomen or LCIG delivered for 24 h to the jejunum through a nasogastric tube with jejunal extension. Serial blood samples were collected for PK. Comparability of the LD PK parameters between the two treatment regimens was determined. Selected plasma samples were pooled per treatment group and per time point for metabolite profiling. LC-MSn was performed using high-resolution mass spectrometry to identify drug-related material across the dosing regimens and time points. The LD PK parameter central values and 90% confidence intervals following the foslevodopa/foscarbidopa subcutaneous infusion were between 0.8 and 1.25 relative to the LCIG infusion. With LCIG administration, LD, CD, 3-OMD, DHPA, DOPAC, and vanillacetic acid were identified in plasma at early and late time points (0.75 and 24 h); the metabolic profile after administration of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa demonstrated the same drug-related compounds with the exception of the administered foslevodopa. 3-OMD and vanillacetic acid levels increased over time in both treatment regimens. Relative quantification of LC-MS peak areas showed no major differences in the metabolite profiles. These results indicate that neither the addition of monophosphate prodrug moieties nor SC administration affects the circulating metabolite profile of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa compared to LCIG.

Improved Sleep Correlates with Improved Quality of Life and Motor Symptoms with Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa.

BACKGROUND: Foslevodopa/foscarbidopa is a subcutaneous infusion of levodopa/carbidopa prodrugs. OBJECTIVES: Assess correlations between sleep and efficacy from interim data of a phase 3 trial of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa (NCT03781167). METHODS: Pearson correlations between sleep (Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2 [PDSS-2]) and quality of life (QoL; Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39), motor experiences of daily living (m-EDL; Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Scale Part II), and "Off"/"On" times were calculated for baseline and week 26 improvements. Regression analyses were adjusted for baseline PDSS-2 score. RESULTS: Baseline sleep correlated moderately with QoL (r = 0.44, P < 0.001) and weakly with m-EDL (r = 0.28; P < 0.001). Sleep improvement weakly correlated with improved "Off" time (r = 0.37; P < 0.001) and QoL (r = 0.36; P < 0.001). Regression analyses demonstrated significant positive associations for improved sleep, "Off" time, QoL, and m-EDL. CONCLUSIONS: Improved sleep with foslevodopa/foscarbidopa was associated with improved QoL and "Off" time.

Continuous subcutaneous foslevodopa/foscarbidopa infusion for the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease: Considerations for initiation and maintenance.

Background: As Parkinson's disease (PD) advances, management is challenged by an increasingly variable and inconsistent response to oral dopaminergic therapy, requiring special considerations by the provider. Continuous 24 h/day subcutaneous infusion of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa (LDp/CDp) provides steady dopaminergic stimulation that can reduce symptom fluctuation. Objective: Our aim is to review the initiation, optimization, and maintenance of LDp/CDp therapy, identify possible challenges, and share potential mitigations. Methods: Review available LDp/CDp clinical trial data for practical considerations regarding the management of patients during LDp/CDp therapy initiation, optimization, and maintenance based on investigator clinical trial experience. Results: LDp/CDp initiation, optimization, and maintenance can be done without hospitalization in the clinic setting. Continuous 24 h/day LDp/CDp infusion can offer more precise symptom control than oral medications, showing improvements in motor fluctuations during both daytime and nighttime hours. Challenges include infusion-site adverse events for which early detection and prompt management may be required, as well as systemic adverse events (eg, hallucinations) that may require adjustment of the infusion rate or other interventions. A learning curve should be anticipated with initiation of therapy, and expectation setting with patients and care partners is key to successful initiation and maintenance of therapy. Conclusion: Continuous subcutaneous infusion of LDp/CDp represents a promising therapeutic option for individuals with PD. Individualized dose optimization during both daytime and nighttime hours, coupled with patient education, and early recognition of certain adverse events (plus their appropriate management) are required for the success of this minimally invasive and highly efficacious therapy.

Continuous Subcutaneous Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa in Parkinson's Disease: Safety and Efficacy Results From a 12-Month, Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study.

INTRODUCTION: Foslevodopa/foscarbidopa, a soluble formulation of levodopa/carbidopa (LD/CD) prodrugs for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), is administered as a 24-hour/day continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) with a single infusion site. The efficacy and safety of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa versus oral immediate-release LD/CD was previously demonstrated in patients with PD in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (NCT04380142). We report the results of a separate 52-week, open-label, phase 3 registrational trial (NCT03781167) that evaluated the safety/tolerability and efficacy of 24-hour/day foslevodopa/foscarbidopa CSCI in patients with advanced PD. METHODS: Male and female patients with levodopa-responsive PD and ≥ 2.5 hours of "Off" time/day received 24-hour/day foslevodopa/foscarbidopa CSCI at individually optimized therapeutic doses (approximately 700-4250 mg of LD per 24 hours) for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was safety/tolerability. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in normalized "Off" and "On" time, percentage of patients reporting morning akinesia, Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale-2 (PDSS-2), 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), and EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). RESULTS: Of 244 enrolled patients, 107 discontinued, and 137 completed treatment. Infusion site events were the most common adverse events (AEs). AEs were mostly nonserious (25.8% of patients reported serious AEs) and mild/moderate in severity. At week 52, "On" time without troublesome dyskinesia and "Off" time were improved from baseline (mean [standard deviation (SD)] change in normalized "On" time without troublesome dyskinesia, 3.8 [3.3] hours; normalized "Off" time, -3.5 [3.1] hours). The percentage of patients experiencing morning akinesia dropped from 77.7% at baseline to 27.8% at week 52. Sleep quality (PDSS-2) and quality of life (PDQ-39 and EQ-5D-5L) also improved. CONCLUSION: Foslevodopa/foscarbidopa has the potential to provide a safe and efficacious, individualized, 24-hour/day, nonsurgical alternative for patients with PD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03781167.

Comparability of Foslevodopa/Foscarbidopa Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Asian and White Participants.

This phase 1 study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a single 24-hour continuous subcutaneous dose of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa in healthy adult Japanese (N = 24), Han Chinese (N = 8), and White (N = 24) participants. Three doses of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa were evaluated in healthy participants for this study: 480/24, 960/48, and 1440/72 mg/day. Serial blood samples for measurement of levodopa, carbidopa, foslevodopa, foscarbidopa, and 3-O-methyldopa concentrations were collected for 48 hours after foslevodopa/foscarbidopa administration. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study. Point estimates for ratios of central values indicated that the exposure difference between Japanese and White participants was <10%. The maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve for both LD and CD following foslevodopa/foscarbidopa continuous subcutaneous infusion were comparable between Han Chinese and White participants. Point estimates for ratios of central values indicated that the exposure difference between Han Chinese and White participants was <14%. The regimens tested were generally well tolerated, and no new safety issues were identified in this study. There were no clinically meaningful differences in LD and CD exposures or pharmacokinetics following administration of foslevodopa/foscarbidopa among White, Japanese, and Han Chinese participants.