RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As the global aging population expands, understanding older adults' preferences for place of death becomes pivotal in ensuring person-centered end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the influence of sociodemographic, health, and lifestyle-related factors on end-of-life care preferences of older adults in South Tyrol, Italy. METHODS: Employing a cross-sectional design, a population-based survey was conducted with a stratified probabilistic sample of adults aged ≥ 75 years in South Tyrol (Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen, Italy). From a randomly selected sample of 3,600 older adults, participants were invited to respond to a questionnaire that included items on older adults' preferences for place of death and socio-demographic and health- and lifestyle-related factors, including frailty (e.g., PRISMA-7). Descriptive and multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The majority (55.3%) of the 1,695 older adults (participation rate: 47%) expressed a preference for dying at home and 12.7% indicated a desire for specialized end-of-life care in a healthcare facility. However, 27.9% refrained from disclosing their end-of-life care preferences. The factors influencing these preferences concerning the place of death included age, native language, educational level, living situation, and community. Compared to the preference of dying at own home or home of family or friends, older adults aged ≥ 85 years (OR = 0.57, P = 0.002) and living in an urban area (OR = 0.40, P < 0.001) were less likely to prefer dying at a hospital, palliative care unit, or hospice. Older adults living alone (OR = 1.90, P < 0.001), Italian-speaking (OR = 1.46, P = 0.03), and those with an educational level above high school (OR = 1.69, P = 0.002) were more likely to prefer dying at a hospital, palliative care unit, or hospice. CONCLUSIONS: End-of-life care preferences among older adults in South Tyrol were associated with socio-demographic, yet not health- and lifestyle-related factors. Recognizing and integrating these preferences is essential for developing, implementing, and evaluating interventions to promote advance care planning and provide effective, patient-centered end-of-life care.
Asunto(s)
Estilo de Vida , Prioridad del Paciente , Cuidado Terminal , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Italia/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Prioridad del Paciente/psicología , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Cuidado Terminal/métodos , Actitud Frente a la Muerte , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine the associations of smoking cessation with the subsequent frailty status trajectory using data from a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling older adults living in England. DESIGN: A prospective panel study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2600 community-dwelling older adults aged 60 or older in England who used to smoke. METHODS: The past smokers were divided into 5 groups based on years since smoking cessation: 0-10, 11-20, 21-30, 31-40, and 41+ years. The Frailty Index (FI) was constructed using 60 deficits and repeatedly calculated every 2 years over 16 years. Trajectories of FI according to years since smoking cessation were estimated by a mixed-effects model. RESULTS: A mixed-effects model adjusted for age, sex, education, wealth, and alcohol use showed that FI increased over time in all groups and that longer duration since smoking cessation was significantly associated with lower FI. Those who quit 41 years earlier or more had the lowest frailty trajectory, however, there was still a gap between them and never smokers. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The current study showed that past smokers with a longer duration of quitting smoking had a significantly lower degree of frailty at baseline and over time. These findings highlight beneficial effects of smoking cessation on frailty even in middle or old age and could be used in public health education to promote the importance of quitting smoking.
RESUMEN
Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can reduce mortality and improve physical functioning in older patients, but current programs do not support the needs of older patients with comorbidities or frailty, for example due to transport problems and physical limitations. Home-exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (HEBCR) programs may better meet these needs, but physiotherapy guidelines for personalising HEBCR for older, frail patients with cardiovascular disease are lacking. Purpose: To provide expert recommendations for physiotherapists on how to administer HEBCR to older adults with comorbidities or frailty. Methods: This Delphi study involved a panel of Dutch experts in physiotherapy, exercise physiology, and cardiology. Three Delphi rounds were conducted between December 2020 and February 2022. In the first round panellists provided expertise on applicability and adaptability of existing CR-guidelines. In the second round panellists ranked the importance of statements about HEBCR for older adults. In the third round panellists re-ranked statements when individual scores were outside the semi-interquartile range. Consensus was defined as a semi-interquartile range of ≤ 1.0. Results: Of 20 invited panellists, 11 (55%) participated. Panellists were clinical experts with a median (interquartile range) work experience of 20 (10.5) years. The panel reached a consensus on 89% of statements, identifying key topics such as implementing the patient perspective, assessing comorbidity and frailty barriers to exercise, and focusing on personal goals and preferences. Conclusion: This Delphi study provides recommendations for personalised HEBCR for older, frail patients with cardiovascular disease, which can improve the effectiveness of CR-programs and address the needs of this patient population. Prioritising interventions aimed at enhancing balance, lower extremity strength, and daily activities over interventions targeting exercise capacity may contribute to a more holistic and effective approach, particularly for older adults.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study quantifies incremental healthcare expenditures of functional impairments and phenotypic frailty in specific healthcare sectors. METHODS: Pooled 2023 analysis of 4 prospective cohort studies linked with Medicare claims including 4318 women and 3847 men attending an index examination (2002-2011). Annualized inpatient, skilled nursing facility (SNF), home healthcare (HHC) and outpatient costs (2023 dollars) ascertained for 36 months following index examination. Functional impairments (difficulty performing 4 activities of daily living) and frailty phenotype (operationalized using 5 components) derived from cohort data. Weighted multimorbidity index including demographics derived from claims. RESULTS: Mean age at index examination was 79.2 years. After accounting for multimorbidity and each other, average annualized incremental costs of 3-4 functional impairments versus no impairment in women (men) was $2838 ($5516) in inpatient, $1572 ($1446) in SNF and $1349 ($1060) in HHC sectors; average incremental costs of phenotypic frailty versus robust in women (men) was $4100 (not significant for men) in inpatient, $1579 ($1254) in SNF and $645 ($526) in HHC sectors. Incremental inpatient costs were primarily due to a higher hospitalization risk, while incremental SNF and HHC costs were related to both increased risks of utilization and higher costs among individuals with utilization. Neither geriatric domain was associated with outpatient costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of community-dwelling beneficiaries, functional impairments were independently associated with higher subsequent expenditures in inpatient, SNF and HHC sectors among both sexes. Phenotypic frailty was independently associated with higher subsequent inpatient costs in women, and higher SNF and HHC costs in both sexes.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study explored the experiences and challenges of older adults with functional disabilities in Israel during the ongoing Israel-Hamas war, particularly those receiving care from migrant live-in carers. The main objectives were to identify their main concerns and coping strategies during this period. METHOD: A qualitative methodology was employed, involving face-to-face interviews with 13 older adults (mean age 91.33, SD = 5.31). All participants liveded in separate housesholds with the assistance of migrant live-in carers. They were recruited through purposive and snowball sampling techniques. The interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Two main themes emerged from data analysis: 1) Concerns for others affected by the war and concerns for oneself, and 2) Coping strategies, including utilizing personal resources such as optimism and distraction, seeking connections with family members and carers, and contributing to the community. CONCLUSION: The study highlights the interplay between the vulnerabilities and strengths of older adults during wartime. Their ability to mobilize both internal and external coping strategies reflects an active approach to managing the stress and uncertainties of war, underscoring their resilience and agency and challenging the perception of older adults as passive recipients of care.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is the gold standard treatment for bladder cancer (high-risk/muscle invasive). The transperitoneal approach is associated with significant gastrointestinal complications like ileus. In the elderly and frail with a single functional kidney, we describe an extraperitoneal technique of radical cystectomy, with a ureterostomy, to be performed without general anesthesia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The elderly, frail, and high-risk candidates for general anesthesia, with a prior history of nephroureterectomy with a second primary muscle-invasive bladder cancer, were chosen. All patients underwent the described procedure under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. The posterior dissection was retrograde, caudal to cranial, with the peritoneum being opened only for resection of the dome. A cutaneous ureterostomy was fashioned on the side of the functional kidney. Peri-operative parameters were assessed for early recovery in this high-risk group. RESULTS: The mean age was 82 years (range: 73-91), with Charleson Comorbidity Index 5, and were all deemed unfit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With a median duration of 127.5 minutes, an average blood loss of 225ml, and no patient requiring general anesthesia; early ambulation, early return of bowel function, and a lesser hospital stay (7 days) with minimal morbidity were achieved. Negative surgical margins were achieved in all cases, with a mean harvest of 29 lymph nodes. Only 1 patient developed stomal stenosis. The cause-specific survival (CSS) is 100% at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The highlighting features are the early return of bowel function (flatus passage on day 1) and the avoidance of the cardio-pulmonary complications of general anesthesia. The extraperitoneal cystectomy offers a promising alternative in this select group and warrants further studies to extrapolate this technique for bilateral urinary drainage.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aging population drives a growing demand for care, particularly in Europe. It is estimated that approximately 1.5-2 million individuals have a chronic wound. Among these, pressure ulcers (PUs) are one of the most prevalent complications in vulnerable individuals. Malnutrition is a primary risk factor, yet it can be mitigated through proper nutrition and adequate community support. The community nurse plays a crucial role in managing chronic conditions and nutrition through constant and professional monitoring. AIM: This article presents a comprehensive systematic review (SR) protocol to examine the role of community nursing of nutritional intervention of frail population with wound care. METHODS: A SR will be conducted according to international standards and reported following the PRISMA Guidelines for SRs. The search will be conducted in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL, supplemented by grey literature sources. The methodological quality and risk of bias will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) framework. The protocol has been registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF). CONCLUSIONS: It is anticipated that the findings of this SR will provide new evidence on the relationships between nutritional nursing interventions and wound care management primarily in the community setting.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Older patients from long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) presenting to emergency departments (EDs) exhibit a higher prevalence of frailty than those from the community. However, no study has examined frailty in patients from LTCHs in the ED. This study compared frailty in older patients from LTCHs and the community. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from the EDs of three university hospitals between 1 August and 31 October 2023, involving 5908 patients (515 from LTCHs and 5393 from the community). The Korean version of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS-K) was used to assess individuals aged 65 and older. We compared clinical characteristics, frailty, length of stay (LOS), and diagnosis between patients from LTCHs (LTCH group) and the community (community group). RESULTS: Among ED patients, 55.0% and 35.2% in the LTCH and the community groups, respectively, were frail (p < 0.001). Of these, 71.7% in the LTCH group were hospitalized compared with 53.1% in the community group (p = 0.001). The odds ratio for in-hospital mortality was 4.910 (95% CI 1.458-16.534, p = 0.010) for frail LTCH patients and 3.748 (95% CI 2.599-5.405, p < 0.001) for frail community patients, compared to non-frail patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients from LTCHs with frailty had higher hospital admission rates and increased in-hospital mortality compared to those in the community at the same frailty level. This study offers essential insights into the characteristics of older patients in LTCHs for healthcare administrators and medical staff worldwide.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Managing older patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is challenging due to their underrepresentation in clinical trials, comorbidities and increased complication risk. This study evaluates risk assessment and management outcomes in older PE patients focussing on home and reperfusion treatment. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed with acute PE at an academic medical centre (2015-2022). RESULTS: 242 patients with a mean age of 77 years were included. All 59 patients with negative Hestia criteria were discharged ≤24h, and in total 81 patients (35%) received home treatment. Among these 14-day mortality and recurrent venous-thromboembolism were 0% and major bleeding occurred in 1.3% (one patient, 95%CI 0.11-6.1). European Society of Cardiology (ESC) risk-classification showed 9 low-risk PE (3.9%), 199 intermediate-risk (87%), and 20 high-risk PE patients (8.8). In 5 of the 20 high-risk patients, hypotension was mainly caused by another condition, i.e. sepsis. Eight high-risk patients received reperfusion therapy. Fourteen-day mortality was 51% in high-risk patients (95%CI 27-71); 5 out of 8 patients receiving reperfusion treatment died within 5 days. Patients with an Acute Presenting Older Patient (APOP) score of ≥45% had higher 14-day mortality (28%; 95%CI 12-46) compared to <45% (3.2%; 95%CI 0.85-8.3; HR 10.2; 95%CI 2.6-39). CONCLUSION: Selecting for home treatment using Hestia was safe for older PE patients in our cohort. Mortality in the high-risk group was high also when receiving reperfusion treatment. The ESC risk-classification and APOP score identified patients at higher mortality risk, suggesting their potential utility in clinical decision-making.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Frailty is characterized by vulnerability and decline in physical, mental, and social activity, significantly contributing to adverse health outcomes. Frailty encompasses nutritional status, muscle strength, inflammation, and hormones. Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) is one of the hormones hypothesized to play a role in frailty. Handgrip strength (HGS) correlates with overall muscle strength. The fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illnesses, and loss of weight (FRAIL) scale can be used to readily screen frailty. Identifying markers associated with frailty can facilitate its early diagnosis, risk stratification, and target interventions to prevent or mitigate its negative consequences. This study sought to evaluate the associations between frailty, HGS, and DHEAS in a Portuguese frailty unit (FU). METHODS: We developed an observational retrospective study in an FU. Patients admitted to the FU underwent a rehabilitation program. We assessed frailty with the FRAIL scale. We assayed DHEAS upon admission to the FU. We measured HGS at admission (i-HGS) and discharge (f-HGS). We also considered HGS variation (∆ HGS) and length of stay. RESULTS: Out of 119 subjects, 97 fulfilled the eligibility criteria (mean age 78.35 ± 9.58 years; 44.33% men). Overall, 88 (90.72%) patients had a FRAIL scale score of 3 or more. DHEAS values were not significantly different in either the categories of the FRAIL scale or frailty status. DHEAS values were also not significantly correlated with either i-HGS, f-HGS, ∆ HGS, age, or FU length of stay. Frail patients had a significantly lower i-HGS (p = 0.002) and f-HGS (p = 0.001) and a significantly higher length of stay (p = 0.006). Also, the i-HGS and f-HGS significantly decreased with the increase of the FRAIL scale score (p < 0.0001 for both). The cut-off values of the i-HGS and the f-HGS for detecting frail patients in our study were 13.3 kg and 19.1 kg, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both). The i-HGS was significantly and independently associated with the frailty status of frail (p = 0.001), with a 15% probability reduction of a patient being frail for every kilogram increase in the i-HGS. CONCLUSION: Frail patients assessed with the FRAIL scale had a significantly lower i-HGS and f-HGS and a higher length of stay. In this study, we found frailty and DHEAS to be not associated and DHEAS values to be not correlated with i-HGS or f-HGS. In our opinion, the creation of an FU with an initial FRAIL scale screening and HGS measurement might have a significant impact on identifying frail people and ensuring the implementation of a multimodal multidisciplinary approach.
RESUMEN
Owing to the gradual aging of today's population, an increase in the prevalence of frailty syndrome has been noticed. This complex state of health, characterized by decreased resilience and tolerance with concurrent increased vulnerability to stressors and adverse health-related factors, has drawn researchers' attention in recent years. Rectal cancer, which constitutes ~30% of all colorectal cancers, is a disease noticeably related to the elderly. In its locally advanced form, it is conventionally treated with trimodal therapy-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite its good clinical outcomes and improvement in rectal cancer local control, as evidenced by clinical trials, it remains unclear if all frail patients benefit from that approach since it may be associated with adverse side effects that cannot be handled by them. As old patients, and frail ones even more noticeably, are poorly represented in the clinical trials describing outcomes of the standard treatment, this article aims to review the current knowledge on the trimodal therapy of rectal cancer with an emphasis on novel approaches to rectal cancer that can be implemented for frail patients.
RESUMEN
Introduction Frailty, a key issue in geriatric health, signifies heightened vulnerability due to the decline in various physiological systems, exacerbated by conditions such as diabetes. Diabetes and frailty together lead to significant disabilities and higher mortality, necessitating early screening and targeted interventions. The relationship between frailty and diabetes remains under-researched, prompting this study to explore their association in individuals over 50 years of age using the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS). Methods and materials The study was an observational cross-sectional study conducted at MM Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (MMIMSR), Mullana, India, among 102 diabetic and 100 non-diabetic individuals aged more than 50 years, with data collected through interviews using a pre-validated proforma. Frailty was assessed using the EFS, categorizing patients into fit, vulnerable, and various levels of frailty based on their scores. Results The study found a higher prevalence and severity of frailty among diabetic individuals (61.8%) compared to non-diabetics (29%), with frailty being more pronounced across all age groups and both genders in diabetics. The severity of frailty increased with the duration of diabetes but showed no significant correlation with glycemic control (HbA1c). Strengths and limitations The study prospectively collected data, including middle-aged participants starting from age 50, and uniquely used the EFS to assess frailty in diabetic patients, excluding those with other chronic diseases (end-stage renal disease (ESRD), malignancy, etc.). However, limitations included a small sample size, recruitment from a single institution in India, and some EFS questions being less relevant to the Indian diabetic population. Conclusion The study found a 61.8% prevalence of frailty in diabetics compared to 29% in non-diabetics, with frailty being more severe and positively correlated with the duration of diabetes but not with glycemic control (HbA1c).
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: As complexity and comorbidities increase with age, the increasing number of community-dwelling older adults poses a challenge to healthcare professionals in making trade-offs between beneficial and harmful treatments, monitoring deteriorating patients and resource allocation. Mortality predictions may help inform these decisions. So far, a systematic overview on the characteristics of currently existing mortality prediction models, is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To provide a systematic overview and assessment of mortality prediction models for the community-dwelling older population. METHODS: A systematic search of terms related to predictive modelling and older adults was performed until March 1st, 2024, in four databases. We included studies developing multivariable all-cause mortality prediction models for community-dwelling older adults (aged ≥65 years). Data extraction followed the CHARMS Checklist and Quality assessment was performed with the PROBAST tool. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies involving 38 unique mortality prediction models were included, of which 14 models were based on a cumulative deficit-based frailty index and 9 on machine learning. C-statistics of the models ranged from 0.60 to 0.93 for all studies versus 0.61-0.78 when a frailty index was used. Eight models reached c-statistics higher than 0.8 and reported calibration. The most used variables in all models were demographics, symptoms, diagnoses and physical functioning. Five studies accounting for eleven models had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Some mortality prediction models showed promising results for use in practice and most studies were of sufficient quality. However, more uniform methodology and validation studies are needed for clinical implementation.
Asunto(s)
Vida Independiente , Humanos , Anciano , Mortalidad/tendencias , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Fragilidad/mortalidad , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Modelos EstadísticosRESUMEN
Background: The impact of COVID-19 on older adults' personality development is essential for emergency management but under-researched. This study seeks to explore the personality profiles of older adults living in the United States and how these profiles transitioned during the pandemic. Methods: Longitudinal data were collected from 3,550 adults aged 60 and older who participated in both the 2016 and 2020 waves of the Health and Retirement Survey (61.18% female, mean age 65.85 in 2016). Personality traits were assessed using the Midlife Development Inventory. COVID-19-related experiences including pandemic concerns, restricted healthcare access, financial instability, work challenges, disrupted social connections, and mutual aid behaviors. Latent Profile Analysis and Transition Analysis were used for analysis. Results: Three distinct personality profiles were identified: Well-adjusted, Moderate-adjusted, and Poor-adjusted. About 42% of respondents experienced personality changes during the pandemic. Higher levels of COVID-19 concern were linked to an increased likelihood of transitioning to Poor-adjusted from Moderate (OR=1.06, p<0.05) or Well-adjusted (OR=1.05, p<0.01). Challenges such as healthcare delays and financial hardships hindered transitions from Poor- to Moderate-adjusted (Healthcare delay: OR=0.39, p<0.05; Financial hardships: OR=0.67, p<0.05) but increased the likelihood of Moderate-adjusted individuals transitioning to Poor-adjusted (Healthcare delay: OR=1.46, p<0.05; Financial hardships: OR=1.51, p<0.05). However, Poor-adjusted individuals who provided help to others were more likely to transition to Moderate-adjusted (OR=2.71, p<0.01). Conclusions: Personality transitions during crisis are significant among older adults. Future interventions should focus on addressing traumatic concerns, encouraging helping behaviors, and mitigating healthcare and financial challenges to support older adults' personality development during crisis.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of three frailty assessment tools in determining frailty risk among hospitalized patients with stroke and to offer a reference framework for selecting appropriate clinical frailty assessment tools in stroke management. METHODS: A group of 203 hospitalized patients who had stroke were selected through convenience sampling and assessed for frailty using the Frailty Index, Fried Frailty Phenotype, FRAIL Scale, and Tilburg Frailty Scale. The efficacy of the three frailty assessment tools in assessing frailty risk in hospitalized patients with stroke was compared via Bayes discrimination and ROC curve analysis by using the Frailty Index as the diagnostic criterion for stroke-related frailty. RESULTS: The incidence of frailty among patients with stroke ranged from 21.2â¯% to 23.6â¯%. The Kappa values indicating the agreement between the Frailty Index and Fried's Frailty Phenotype, FRAIL Scale, and Tilburg Frailty Scale were 0.826, 0.928, and 0.707, respectively (all P < 0.01). The cross-validation accuracy for frailty risk prediction in patients with stroke was 94.1â¯%, 97.5â¯%, and 89.7â¯%, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves for these tools were 0.884, 0.955, and 0.896, respectively. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of the three assessment tools in assessing frailty risk in patients with stroke ranked from highest to lowest, was as follows: FRAIL Scale, Fried Frailty Phenotype, and Tilburg Frailty Scale. Considering both assessment efficacy and convenience, the FRAIL Scale is recommended for widespread use in frailty screening among hospitalized patients with stroke.
Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Evaluación Geriátrica , Hospitalización , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Anciano Frágil , Medición de Riesgo/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: There is no report on the initial antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment of older Thai epileptic patients. This study aimed to determine the trends, prescribing patterns, and determinants of initial AED treatment. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data on older (≥60 years) epileptic patients gathered from one tertiary-care hospital's database from 2012 to 2022. We evaluated the trends and prescribing patterns for starting AED treatment. We used logistic regression to identify the determinants of the initial treatment with new-generation AEDs. KEY FINDINGS: This study comprised 919 participants (59.19% men, 70.99 ± 8.00 years old). Between 2012 and 2022, we observed a decreasing trend in starting therapy with old-generation AEDs, from 89.16% to 64.58%. In contrast, there was an increasing trend in initiating treatment with new-generation AEDs, from 10.84% to 35.72% (P for trend <0.001 for both). Each assessment year, the most prescribed treatment pattern was monotherapy. The determinants of initial therapy with new-generation AEDs included the year treatment began (adjusted odds ratios [AOR] = 1.0006; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.0003-1.0008), non-Universal Coverage Scheme (AOR = 1.94; 95% CI 1.26-3.00), liver disease (AOR = 6.44; 95% CI 2.30-18.08), opioid use (AOR = 2.79; 95% CI 1.28-6.09), and statin use (AOR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.36-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: There is a growing trend of initiating treatment with new-generation AEDs in older Thai patients with epilepsy. Factors positively associated with starting new-generation AEDs include the year treatment began, non-Universal Coverage Scheme, liver disease, and opioid use, while statin use is a negatively associated factor.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ageing of the population is leading to an increase in the number of traumatic injuries and represents a major challenge for the future. Falls represent the leading cause of Emergency department admission in older people, with injuries ranging from minor to severe multiple injuries. Older injured patients are more likely to be undertriaged than younger patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of undertriage in older patients with particular emphasis on access to trauma centres and resuscitation rooms. METHODS: Retrospective observational cross-sectional study based on data prospectively collected from prehospital electronic records including all patients ≥ 18 years for whom an ambulance or helicopter was dispatched between 1 January 2018 and 31 April 2023 due to a trauma. The primary outcome, admission to the resuscitation room of the regional trauma centre with trauma team activation, was assessed by age. Multivariate logistic regression was used to control for known confounders and to test for plausible effect modifiers. RESULTS: Emergency Medical Services treated 37,906 injured patients. Older patients ≥ 75 years represented 17,719 patients (47%). Admission to trauma centre with trauma team activation was lower in older patients, N = 121 (1%) compared to N = 599 (5%) in younger patients, p < 0.001; adjusted odds ratio: 0.33 (0.24-0.45); p < 0.001. Undertriage increased by twofold with age ≥ 75; OR: 1.81 (1.04-3.15); p value < 0.001. Undertriaged patients were older, more likely to be female, to have low energy trauma and to be located farther from the regional trauma centre. CONCLUSION: Older injured patients were at increased risk of undertriage and non-trauma team activation admission, especially if they were older, female, had head injury without altered consciousness and greater distance to regional trauma centre.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Centros Traumatológicos , Triaje , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Anciano , Femenino , Masculino , Suiza/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos/organización & administración , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Adulto , Factores de EdadRESUMEN
Introduction: The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is recommended for assessing frailty in older cancer patients but is time-consuming. The G8 screening tool was developed to select frail patients requiring CGA to optimize resources. The Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) is another frailty scale validated for preoperative frailty screening, but scarcely studied in the field of oncogeriatrics. In this study, we examined the added value of the EFS in older cancer patients already considered as frail by the G8, by analyzing the association of EFS with CGA adjusted for age, gender, metastatic stage and comorbidity. We also analyzed the association of EFS with the one-year mortality rate after adjusting for cancer type and metastatic stage. Methodology: This retrospective study included patients aged over 70 years old with a new diagnosis of cancer, considered as potentially frail according to the G8 and who had had a CGA (N = 380). Results: The EFS identified 329 (86.58%) patients as frail and having a statistically significant predicted number of pathological components on the CGA (r = 0.64, p < 0.001). When adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, and metastatic stage, the EFS was independently associated with the CGA (p < 0001), as well as with comorbidity (p = 0.004). The patients who died in the first year (43%) had a significantly higher mean EFS score (8/17) than living patients (6/17) (p < 0.0001). After adjustment for cancer type and stage, EFS independently predicted one-year mortality (OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.08-1.28; pseudo R 2 = 0.228, p < 0.001). Discussion: The EFS is a reliable tool for predicting frailty identified by the CGA in an older cancer population pre-selected as frail by the G8. EFS is an independent predictor of one-year mortality after adjustment for confounding factors. Validation of the EFS as a screening tool for frailty in cancer requires further studies to assess its performance in patients with normal G8 scores.
RESUMEN
Objective: Several studies have demonstrated an association between frailty and worse outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, there is a lack of evidence from Colombia. This study aims to evaluate the association between frailty and the risk of adverse outcomes in patients over 65 years old diagnosed with ACS. Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted, including patients over 65 years old who underwent coronary angiography due to an ACS diagnosis at a hospital in Medellín, Colombia. Frailty was assessed using the FRAIL scale. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and a composite outcome of in-hospital or 30-day mortality, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, hemorrhagic complications, and vascular complications. Results: A total of 112 patients were included. Frail patients (n=35, 31.3%) were older, had a lower socioeconomic status, higher GRACE scores, and more severely compromised coronary vessels. A significant association was observed between frailty and 30-day mortality (relative risk [RR] 19.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.04-72.61; p<0.001), the composite outcome (RR 4.57, 95% CI: 2.56-8.34; p<0.001), and longer hospital stays (9 days vs. 5 days in the non-frail group). Conclusions: A considerable number of patients over 65 years old with ACS were frail. Frailty was associated with adverse in-hospital and 30-day outcomes.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Physical activity and social engagement protect older adults against functional decline and improve their quality of life. Physical inactivity poses an increased risk for noncommunicable diseases. Globally, one in four adults is physically inactive. Enhancing the physical activity of older adults is crucial not only for increasing their life expectancy but also for improving their functional status and quality of life. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the physical activity, functional status, and quality of life of older adults attending the medical outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Methods: The study adopted a descriptive cross-sectional research design. A total of 100 female and male patients above 65 years of age with comorbid conditions attending the medical outpatient department participated in the study. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of these patients were assessed. In addition, the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity, Katz Index of Independence in Activities of Daily Living, Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale, and Older People Quality of Life Questionnaire were used to measure the physical activity, functional status, and quality of life of patients. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Among the participants, only 17% were active, and 35% were underactive for regular light activities. Approximately 81% did not perform any activity to improve their muscle strength or flexibility. In 56% of the participants, disability was present. The majority mentioned that they experienced difficulties in preparing food and shopping. Regarding the quality of life of the participants, the mean ± standard deviation score was 77.38 ± 9.03. Significant results were found in the domains of independence, control over life, and freedom. The overall quality of life was not related to leisure and activities, financial circumstances, the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale score, the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity 2 score, and the Rapid Assessment of Physical Activity 1 score. The quality of life was weakly related to emotional and psychological well-being, control over life, home and neighborhood, freedom, independence, and social relationships. Conclusion: Limited physical activity and poor functional status impact the quality of life of older adults. Therefore, educational and physical interventions should be implemented at the hospital and community levels to improve the physical activity, functional status, and quality of life of older adults.