RESUMEN
Reproductive traits are an integral part of the goals of the breeding programs that contribute to the economic success of production. Reproductive phenotypes such as litter size, number of piglets born alive, or litter weight at birth are mainly attributed to females. Thus, the maternal components can be found by default in quantitative genetics' animal models. Still, paternal contribution to variance components should not be discarded. In this review, we indicate the importance of paternal effects in pig breeding by describing both the biology and genetics of boars' traits, the use of (non-)genetic service sire effects in quantitative genetic models for traits measured on females, and genes involved in male reproduction. We start by describing the important biological traits of boars that have the most important effect on their reproductive abilities, i.e., sexual maturity, sperm quality, and testes parameters. Then we move to the possible environmental effects that could affect those traits of boars (e.g., feed, temperature). The main part of the review in detail describes the genetics of boars' reproductive traits (i.e., heritability) and their direct effect on reproductive traits of females (i.e., genetic correlations). We then move to the use of both genetic and non-genetic service sire effects in quantitative models estimated as their percentage in the total variance of traits, which vary depending on the breed from 1 to 4.5% or from 1 to 2%, respectively. Finally, we focus on the description of candidate genes and confirmed mutations affecting male reproduction success: IGF2, Tgm8, ESR1, ZSWIM7, and ELMO1. In conclusion, the observed variance of paternal effects in female reproduction traits might come from various attributes of boars including biological and genetic aspects. Those attributes of boars should not be neglected as they contribute to the success of female reproductive traits.
RESUMEN
Genetic testing is becoming increasingly available and affordable. Understanding the reasons for individual decisions about genetic testing may assist in the identification of clinically appropriate use of genetic counseling and genetic testing resources. With the ongoing development of cancer genetic counseling services in Taiwan, we conducted this study to understand the characteristics of those seeking cancer genetic counseling and genetic testing and the predictors for undergoing genetic testing after counseling. Cross-sectional with correlational design was used in this study. Surveys completed by patients visiting the genetic counseling clinic at the cancer center included demographics, personal and family history of cancer, and questions on attitudes toward genetic counseling and genetic testing. Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyze the predictors of decision to undergo genetic testing. A total of 120 participants between the years 2018 and 2021 were analyzed, of which 54.2% were referred by health care professionals. The majority (76.7%) had a personal history of cancer and 50% had breast cancer. Over half (53.3%) had a strong family history of cancer defined as two or more 1st-degree relatives having cancer at a young age. Only 35.8% decided to receive genetic testing right after counseling and 47.5% were undecided. The main reason for hesitation or not pursuing testing was cost (41.4%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a positive attitude toward genetic counseling was significantly associated with the uptake of genetic testing (Odds ratio 7.60, 95% CI 2.34-24.66, p < 0.001). Given the significant number of individuals undecided about genetic testing after counseling, decision aid could be developed to support genetic counseling and increase satisfaction with the testing decision.
RESUMEN
Rare diseases continue to present numerous challenges for the medical field worldwide. Understanding innovative mechanisms of service provision for patients with rare conditions through shared communication across different healthcare systems should be encouraged. This study presents the organization of medical care for people with rare diseases in Russia, while also exploring the epidemiology of both life-threatening and chronic, progressive, rare diseases. Further, the regulation of medical care provision is examined, including the preferential provision of medicines in different Russian regions and potential role of compulsory medical insurance. The principles guiding patient referrals to appropriate specialist centres for rare diseases are outlined, including considering the increased role that public-patient organizations have in developing healthcare systems. In reviewing the specialized resources available for patients with rare diseases, medical genetics services offering diagnostics and counselling are discussed. Additionally, population-level preventive care necessitates significant investment, principally in diagnostic technology and screening programs. As seen elsewhere, these initiatives involve forming reference centres and tertiary-level pediatric departments staffed by multidisciplinary specialists in rare diseases. Numerous challenges are highlighted relating to Russian healthcare systems, including the financing of expensive treatments and ensuring equitable access to medical care for those patients with rare diseases outside of State-subsidized programs. Recommendations are made on creating international registries for knowledge sharing, quality appraisal, newborn screening, diagnostic challenges, available treatments and rehabilitation services. Given the high cost of rare diseases, cost-effective interventions are advisable, particularly developing preventive programs and targeting the most common and severe mutations in patients planning pregnancies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous research found that the cancer history of an individual's sibling may be a better indicator than that of the parents. We aim to provide recommendations for opportunistic screening for individuals whose sibling had been diagnosed with cancer. METHODS: During the physical examination in Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 43,300 people were asked if they have at least two siblings who developed cancer. RESULTS: A total of 1270 sibling-pairs from 766 families developed cancer, including 367 pairs of brothers (Bro-pairs), 368 pairs of sisters (Sis-pairs), and 535 pairs of brother-and-sister (BroSis-pairs). The mean ages at diagnosis of cancer for the three groups were from 58 to 62 years. More than half of Bro-pairs (55.3%) or Sis-pairs (51.1%) had cancer from the same systemic origin, and more than a quarter of Bro-pairs (28.1%) and Sis-pairs (37.2%) developed the same type of cancer. However, only 36.0% of BroSis-pairs developed cancers from the same systemic origin, and 18.9% developed the same type of cancer. In Bro-pairs and BroSis-pairs, lung cancer and digestive system cancer were the most common cancers, while in Sis-pairs, breast cancer, lung cancer, cervical cancer, liver cancer and thyroid cancer were the most common ones. CONCLUSIONS: If an individual's sibling is diagnosed with cancer, the individual should consider participating in opportunistic screening annually, especially for lung cancer and digestive system cancers for both sexes. For sisters, breast cancer, cervical cancer and thyroid cancer should be screened early. Additionally, genetic services are essential for individuals who have siblings with cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Hermanos , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , China/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/epidemiología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Endocrinas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Endocrinas/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Distribución por Sexo , Factores Sexuales , Neoplasias Urogenitales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Urogenitales/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Our purpose was to explore genetics health professionals' (GHPs) expectations of primary care providers' (PCPs) role in genomic medicine now and in the future. Focus groups/interviews were conducted with GHPs in Ontario, Canada. Recordings were transcribed and analysed using qualitative descriptive analysis. Five focus groups (6 clinical geneticists, 24 genetic counselors, 1 nurse, 4 laboratory staff, 3 genetics program administrators) and 3 interviews (nurses) were conducted. GHPs described a key role for PCPs in genomic medicine that could be enhanced if GHPs and PCPs worked together more effectively, making better use of GHPs as a scarce specialist resource, improving PCP knowledge and awareness of genomics, and increasing GHPs' understanding of primary care practice and how to provide PCPs meaningful education and support. Health system change is needed to facilitate the GHP/PCP relationship and improve care. This might include: PCPs ordering more genetic tests independently or with GHP guidance prior to GHP consultations, genomic expertise in primary care clinics or GHPs being accessible through buddy systems or virtually through telemedicine or electronic consultation, and developing educational materials and electronic decision support for PCPs. Our findings highlight need for change in delivering genomic medicine, which requires building the relationship between GHPs and PCPs, and creating new service delivery models to meet future needs.
RESUMEN
Genetic counselling and testing are essential health services for the management of heritable diseases. However, in low-and-middle income countries like Kenya, genetic counsellors are not yet a licenced profession, and there is limited availability of and access to genetic testing. This study aimed to uncover opportunities and barriers for genetic service delivery in the Kenyan healthcare system from the perspectives of those who provide genetic testing and/or genetic counselling. Participants included Kenyan health personnel who deliver genetic services. This was a qualitative study that collected data via semi-structured one-on-one interviews and analyzed it using inductive thematic analysis. Participant demographics and characteristics of clinical genetic service provision were collected using a survey and results summarized using descriptive statistics. Themes revealed during analysis were compared to the clinical characteristics of genetic service provision to inform the opportunities and barriers. Fifteen interviews were conducted in total. Thematic analysis indicated that participants believed that the barriers facing genetic service delivery were linked to three themes: (1) education and training, (2) costs, and (3) counselling challenges. The opportunities for genetic service delivery were linked to four themes: (1) demand, (2) education and training, (3) encouraging a multidisciplinary approach to care, and (4) enhancing laboratory infrastructure. These findings are crucial for the development of a national evidence-informed and culturally appropriate model for genetic service delivery.
RESUMEN
With the advancements in genetics and genomics in the twenty-first century, genetic services have become an integral part of medical practices in high-income and upper-middle-income countries. However, people living in low and lower-middle-income countries (LICs and LIMCs), including Bangladesh, are rather underprivileged in receiving genetic services. Consequently, genetic disorders are emerging as a significant public health concern in these countries. Lack of expertise, high expense, the dearth of epidemiological data, insufficiently updated medical education system, poor infrastructure, and the absence of comprehensive health policies are the main factors causing people living in these countries not having access to genetic services. In this article, the authors took benefit from their professional experience of practicing medical genetics in the area and reviewed existing literature to provide their opinions. Particularly, it reviews the current knowledge of genetic disorders' burden and their causative factors in Bangladesh. It focuses on why providing genetic services is challenging in the context of the country's cultural and religious sentiment. Finally, it proposes a physician-academician collaborative framework within the existing facility that aims to tackle the challenges. Such a framework could also be useful for other LICs and LMICs to address the challenges associated with providing genetic services.
Asunto(s)
Asesoramiento Genético , Servicios Genéticos , Bangladesh , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Research in the field of genomics and genetics has evolved in recent years and so has the demand of consumers who are increasingly interested in genomic prediction of diseases and various traits. The aim of this study is to identify genetic service delivery models, policies governing the use of genomics medicine, and measures to evaluate genetic services in the province of Quebec, Canada. METHODS: An ad hoc questionnaire was designed and administered online in 2017 to healthcare workers with good knowledge or experience in the provision of BReast CAncer genes 1 and 2 (BRCA1/2), Lynch syndrome, familial hypercholesterolemia, inherited thrombophilia genetic tests, engaged in policy planning or evaluation of genetic services. A quali-quantitative analysis of the survey results was performed. RESULTS: Thirty professionals participated in the study. The delivery models are classified in five categories according to the leading role of healthcare professionals in patient care pathways: i) the geneticist model; ii) the primary care model; iii) the medical specialist model; iv) the population screening program model; and v) the direct-to-consumer model. Barriers to genetic services are the coverage of genetic tests by the publicly funded healthcare system, the availability of qualified personnel, and the number of genetic centers. Regulatory oversight concerning the provision of genetic services appears to be insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Integration between genetics and the overall healthcare system in Quebec is in an early phase. Current models of genetic services require good level of genetic knowledge by all medical specialists, collaboration among different healthcare personnel, and work redistribution. The proper implementation of genomics into healthcare can be achieved through education and training, proper regulatory oversight, genomic policies, and public awareness.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To determine the proportion of patients with colorectal cancer and abnormal immunohistochemistry testing of tumour tissue who were referred to a cancer genetic clinic for genetic counselling and possible germline testing of a blood sample for Lynch syndrome. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with colorectal cancer and abnormal immunohistochemistry tumour tissue testing from St Vincent's Hospital (between November 2007 and December 2016). Patient list was compared against a state-wide database TrakGene to ascertain the overall referral rate for these patients. RESULTS: Of 216 patients, the total referral rate was 33.8% (n = 73), of which 27.8% (n = 60) were referred to St Vincent's Hospital's Cancer Genetics Service, 6% (n = 13) were referred externally and the remaining 66.2% (n = 143) were not referred. Binomial regression analysis performed displayed that age influenced likelihood of referral, where patients were 7.7% more likely to be referred for every decreasing year in age (P = 0.0004). Some clinicians were 4.3 times more likely to refer patients compared to others (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Suboptimal patient uptake for cancer genetics evaluation was found. Identifying barriers to patient referral should lead to changes that increase patient referrals. This will ensure that patients receive adequate education, counselling and management of Lynch syndrome. It would also allow for the identification of further at-risk relatives for whom preventative strategies can be employed. In addition, identification of relatives not at risk by genetic testing will liberate them from unnecessary colonoscopies. Discussion with the clinicians involved has since allowed for copies of the immunohistochemistry results to be forwarded by the Pathology Department to the Cancer Genetics Unit for checking and follow up with the clinician to ensure that their patients are aware of the result and have been offered referral for cancer genetic evaluation. This process is subject to ongoing audit.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/diagnóstico , Asesoramiento Genético , Pruebas Genéticas , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/genética , Femenino , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The combination of increased referral for genetic testing and the current shortage of genetic counselors has necessitated the development and implementation of alternative models of genetic counseling and testing for hereditary cancer assessment. The purpose of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the patient outcomes that are associated with alternative models of genetic testing and genetic counseling for hereditary cancer, including germline-only and tumor testing models. Seven databases were searched, selecting studies that were: (1) full-text articles published ≥2007 or conference abstracts published ≥2015, and (2) assessing patient outcomes of an alternative model of genetic counseling or testing. A total of 79 publications were included for review and synthesis. Data-charting was completed using a data-charting form that was developed by the study team for this review. Seven alternative models were identified, including four models that involved a genetic counselor: telephone, telegenic, group, and embedded genetic counseling models; and three models that did not: mainstreaming, direct, and tumor-first genetic testing models. Overall, these models may be an acceptable alternative to traditional models on knowledge, patient satisfaction, psychosocial measures, and the uptake of genetic testing; however, particular populations may be better served by traditional in-person genetic counseling. As precision medicine initiatives continue to advance, institutions should consider the implementation of new models of genetic service delivery, utilizing a model that will best serve the needs of their unique patient populations.
RESUMEN
Consumer access to third-party services to interpret raw DNA has raised concerns about downstream healthcare implications. This mixed-methods study set out to examine the extent to which genetic counselors have been contacted by consumers of third-party services and describe counselors' experiences with these "consumer" patients. Counselor views on the quality of information provided to consumers were also examined. Eighty-five genetic counselors completed an online survey, of which 22 completed in-depth telephone interviews. Survey and interview data were analyzed and combined using triangulation techniques. Over half (53%) of the survey respondents indicated they had been contacted by a patient following the use of a third-party raw DNA interpretation service. Among counselors contacted, 72% saw at least one patient. Counselors reported challenges unique to this patient population including overemphasis by patients on the validity of the data and patient resistance to information provided by the counselor. Preparation time burden and counselor inexperience and discomfort counseling these patients were additional challenges. Counselors expressed concern about the quality of the raw data and the clarity and usefulness of interpretation reports. Genetic counselors' experiences with consumer's use of third-party DNA interpretation services provide insight on the opportunities and challenges with the availability of raw DNA directly to consumers. Efforts to better support both consumers and genetic service providers are needed to maximize the effective translation of genome-based knowledge for population health.
Asunto(s)
Asesoramiento Genético , Pruebas Genéticas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Comportamiento del Consumidor , ADN , Asesoramiento Genético/métodos , Asesoramiento Genético/psicología , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Personal de Salud/psicología , Humanos , Internet , Investigación Cualitativa , Control de CalidadRESUMEN
AIMS: We describe practitioner knowledge and practices related to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in an evolving landscape of genetic testing. METHODS: A survey was mailed in late 2013 to Florida providers who order HBOC testing. Descriptive statistics were conducted to characterize participants' responses. RESULTS: Of 101 respondents, 66% indicated either no genetics education or education through a commercial laboratory. Although 79% of respondents were aware of the Supreme Court ruling resulting in the loss of Myriad Genetics' BRCA gene patent, only 19% had ordered testing from a different laboratory. With regard to pretest counseling, 78% of respondents indicated they usually discuss 11 of 14 nationally recommended elements for informed consent. Pretest discussion times varied from 3 to 120 min, with approximately half spending <20 min. Elements not routinely covered by >40% of respondents included (1) possibility of a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) and (2) issues related to life/disability insurance. With regard to genetic testing for HBOC, 88% would test an unaffected sister of a breast cancer patient identified with a BRCA VUS. CONCLUSIONS: Results highlight the need to identify whether variability in hereditary cancer service delivery impacts patient outcomes. Findings also reveal opportunities to facilitate ongoing outreach and education.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Atención a la Salud , Servicios Genéticos , Personal de Salud , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/normas , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Femenino , Florida , Servicios Genéticos/organización & administración , Servicios Genéticos/normas , Servicios Genéticos/tendencias , Personal de Salud/organización & administración , Personal de Salud/normas , Personal de Salud/tendencias , HumanosRESUMEN
The genetic counselling profession was established in France in 2004. Eight years later, 122 genetic counsellors have graduated from the unique educational French program which awards the Professional Master Degree of Human Pathology, entitled "Master of Genetic Counselling and Predictive Medicine". As part of a global evaluation of this new profession by health genetic professionals, we undertook a national survey investigating various aspects such as employment, work responsibilities and integration. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the views of genetic professionals on the genetic counsellors' role. Of 422 French professionals invited to take part in this study, 126 participated. The survey underlines that this profession is significantly recognized by physicians practicing within genetics departments. French genetic counsellors are allowed to manage consultations independently, without the necessary presence of a qualified medical geneticist but under his or her responsibility. Genetic counsellors participate in a wide range of consultations. They provide both information for relevant and for genetic testing and sometimes disclose the genetic test result to patient. Eventually, the role of genetic counsellors appears to be directly dependent from the relationship of trust between the two health professions.
RESUMEN
Objetivos: determinar o perfil dos pacientes encaminhados do Serviço Especial de Genética do Hospital das Clínicas da UFMG para avaliação oftalmológica no Hospital São Geraldo, no período de julho de 2008 a janeiro de 2010; determinar as principais causas desses encaminhamentos, as alterações encontradas nos pacientes e os achados mais comuns em algumas das doenças encontradas. Métodos: estudo descritivo baseado em dados dos pacientes atendidos no Setor de Retina do Hospital São Geraldo, encaminhados do Serviço Especial de Genética do Hospital das Clínicas da UFMG, no período de julho de 2008 a janeiro de 2010. Foram coletadas informações sobre gênero, idade, motivo do encaminhamento, principais características clínicas e suspeita diagnóstica. Para cada paciente foram realizados biomicroscopia do segmento anterior e exame do fundo de olho. Resultados: no período foram avaliados 100 pacientes. As principais suspeitas diagnósticas foram retardo mental e dismorfismos sem diagnóstico estabelecido (21%), síndrome de Marfan (12%), síndrome de Cohen (11%), erro inato do metabolismo (9%), neurofibromatose tipo 1 (5%) e síndrome de Stickler (4%). A avaliação oftalmológica contribuiu para o esclarecimento diagnóstico em 66% dos casos. As principais alterações encontradas foram: palidez de disco óptico 10%; estrabismo, iridodonese e alteração da pigmentação da retina, 7% cada; aumento da escavação do disco óptico 6%, disco óptico hipoplásico 5%, coloboma eptose palpebral, 4% cada. Conclusões: as alterações oftalmológicas são características importantes em diversas doenças genéticas. Quando avaliadas adequadamente podem contribuir para o diagnóstico e para estabelecer o prognóstico das síndromes genéticas...
Objectives: To identify the profile of the patients referred from the Special Genetic Service of UFMG University Hospital to ophthalmologic evaluation at São Geraldo Hospital from July 2008 through January 2010; to determine the major causes of such referrals, the patients? disorders, and the most common findings for some of the diseases. Methods: This is a descriptive study based on data of patients at the Retina Sector of São Geraldo Hospital that were referred from the Special Genetic Service of UFMG University Hospital from July 2008 through 2010. The collection included data on gender, age, reason for referral, main clinical characteristic, and suspected diagnosis. Biomicroscopy of the anterior segment and fundoscopy were carried out for all patients. Results: A total of 100 patients was assessed in the period. The main suspected diagnoses were mental retardation and dimorphisms without established diagnosis (21 %), Marfan syndrome (12 %), Cohen syndrome (11 %), innate errors of the metabolism (9 %), neurofibromatosis type 1 (5 %), and Sitckler syndrome (4 %). The ophthalmologic examination contributed to clarifying diagnosis in 66 % of the cases. The major disorders found were: pale optic disc (10 %); strabismus, irregular retinal pigmentation, and iridodonesis (7 % each); increased optic disc cupping (6 %); hypoplastic optic disc (5 %); and coloboma and ptosis (4 % each). Conclusions: Ophthalmologic disorders are important characteristics inherent to several genetic disorders. When properly assessed, they are of great relevance for diagnosis and prognostic of genetic syndromes...
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Enfermedades Hereditarias del Ojo/diagnóstico , Servicios Genéticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Discapacidad Intelectual , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de MarfanRESUMEN
Many new genetic tests for common multifactorial disorders are becoming available to individuals, including direct-to-consumer genotyping services. Typically, studies of public attitudes reveal a high level of interest for individual genotyping. In a Russian urban population, 85% of 2000 respondents answered positively to a question about their own willingness to undergo predictive genetic testing for preventable health conditions. Gender, age and health status significantly influenced response. Multivariate discriminant analyses revealed that wanting to know about probable future diseases, readiness to improve lifestyles and an interest in learning about individual genome characteristics are the most important predictors for wanting to be tested. Along with the high level of interest, highly overestimated expectations were encountered in many studies. With the low predictive abilities of currently available genetic tests for common disorders, proper interpretation of the data and genetic counseling are essential. There is a need for prospective validation of genetic panels for risk assessments, and for efforts to measure the effects of genetic information disclosure and how this information might contribute to lifestyle changes.