Software-driven chronic disease management: Algorithm design and implementation in a community-based blood pressure control pilot.

Background: Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy is rarely attained in practice, resulting in inadequate control of diseases such as hypertension, with poorer results in under-resourced communities. Technology, including artificial intelligence-driven decision support and software-driven workflow transformation, can potentially improve disease outcomes at a reduced cost, although it must be integrated with a holistic approach. Methods: We describe the design of a software platform that enables rapid iterative remote management of >20 conditions across cardiac-kidney-metabolic disease. The platform distributes work across a care team of providers and care navigators, automates decision-making, ordering, and documentation, supports rapid incorporation of new evidence, and launches pragmatic trials. We describe software used in a 500-person community-based blood pressure control implemented as a single-arm quality improvement program. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients meeting the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set quality measure blood pressure goal (<140/90) at 12 weeks. Results: A total of 1609 patients were screened, 945 (59%) were found to have uncontrolled hypertension, and 512 patients consented to join the program. The average age was 61 ± 11 years; 59% were female, and 99% self-identified as Black. Blood pressure distribution was: 10% Stage 1 (SBP 130-139 mmHg or DBP 80-89 mmHg), 69% Stage 2 (SBP 140-179 mmHg or DBP 90-119 mmHg), and 21% Stage 3 (SBP >180 mmHg or DBP >120 mmHg). Two hundred four patients (39%) proceeded to a provider encounter, and 160 of these (78%) completed the program. The Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set blood pressure goal was achieved in <12 weeks of enrollment for 141 participants (69% of those enrolled, 88% of those who completed the program). Conclusion: Software-driven remote blood pressure is feasible, although strategies to improve patient enrollment will be needed to achieve maximum impact. Future work will be required to compare outcomes to usual care and evaluate concurrent management of multiple cardiac-kidney-metabolic conditions.

Medication optimization clinic decreases hospitalizations and mortality for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Study objective: To evaluate the impact of a medication optimization clinic (MOC) on GDMT and outcomes for patients with HFrEF versus usual care. Design: Retrospective evaluation of a multi-site MOC was conducted. Setting: Large health system with academic and community hospitals. Participants: Patients with HFrEF referred to MOC by their cardiologist versus usual care. Interventions: GDMT use managed by an advanced practice provider or clinical pharmacist through weekly telemedicine visits. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was HF hospitalization. Cardiovascular hospitalization and all-cause mortality were also assessed. Kaplan-Meier Curve, Cumulative Incidence Function, and competing risk analysis with regression models were conducted. Results: 1419 patients in MOC group were compared to 5116 control patients. GDMT use was significantly higher in MOC: quadruple therapy (49 % vs. 19 %; p < 0.0001), angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (62 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), beta blocker (92 % vs. 88 %; p < 0.0001), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (69 % vs. 45 %; p < 0.0001), and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (68 % vs. 35 %; p < 0.0001). Competing risk analyses showed that HF and CV hospitalizations were significantly lower at all times points (3, 6, and 12 months) for MOC vs. control (p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was significantly lower at 6 months (p = 0.006) and 12 months (p < 0.001), but did not differ at 3 months (p = 0.35), for MOC vs. control. Conclusions: MOC was associated with improved GDMT and lower risks of hospitalizations due to HF and any cardiovascular cause, and all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF.

Revascularization and outcomes in ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction after heart failure admission: The RevascHeart study.

AIMS: Despite numerous trials on revascularization in patients with heart failure (HF) and ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, its role remains unsettled. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF has shown benefits on outcomes. This multicentre study aims to compare long-term mortality between revascularization and GDMT in patients with ischaemic LV dysfunction following admission for HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2023, 408 patients admitted for HF with a LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40% or less and documented coronary artery disease (CAD) were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their initial treatment decision: revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]) or GDMT. The primary outcome was rate of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, and secondary outcomes included type of revascularization (PCI vs. CABG) and LV reverse remodelling. After a median 44.6-month follow-up, 100 patients (33%) died in the revascularization group, compared to 44 (43%) in the GDMT group. Multivariate analysis showed no significant benefit of revascularization on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-1.39, p = 0.45) or cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.62-1.52, p = 0.90) compared to GDMT. Neither CABG (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.51-1.08, p = 0.13) nor PCI (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.62-1.55, p = 0.93) demonstrated a mortality reduction compared to GDMT. Both groups experienced significant reductions in LV size and improvements in LVEF, greater in the revascularization group. CONCLUSION: Revascularization did not outperform GDMT in ischaemic LV dysfunction following HF admission in this retrospective analysis. Larger prospective studies are needed to clarify the potential role of revascularization in improving outcomes.

Guidelines for treating heart failure.

Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction comprises the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (sacubitril/valsartan), an evidence-based beta-blocker (bisoprolol, carvedilol, or sustained-release metoprolol), a mineralocorticoid antagonist (spironolactone or eplerenone), and a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin or empagliflozin). Optimal guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction comprises a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor with emerging evidence to support the use of a mineralocorticoid antagonist and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. This review will summarize the evidence behind the guideline recommendations, the impact of newer trials on management of patients with HF, and strategies for implementation into clinical practice.

Translating the 2021 ESC heart failure guideline recommendations in daily practice: Results from a heart failure survey. A scientific statement of the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice and the Heart Failure Association of the ESC.

AIMS: Real-world data show that guidelines are insufficiently implemented, and particularly guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) are underused in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in clinical practice. The Council for Cardiology Practice and the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed a survey aiming to (i) evaluate the perspectives of the cardiology community on the 2021 ESC heart failure (HF) guidelines, (ii) pinpoint disparities in disease management, and (iii) propose strategies to enhance adherence to HF guidelines. METHODS AND RESULTS: A 22-question survey regarding the diagnosis and treatment of HFrEF was delivered between March and June 2022. Of 457 physicians, 54% were general cardiologists, 19.4% were HF specialists, 18.9% other cardiac specialists, and 7.7% non-cardiac specialists. For diagnosis, 52.1% employed echocardiography and natriuretic peptides (NPs), 33.2% primarily used echocardiography, and 14.7% predominantly relied on NPs. The first drug class initiated in HFrEF was angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ACEi/ARNi) (91.2%), beta-blockers (BB) (73.8%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) (53.4%), and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (48.1%). The combination ACEi/ARNi + MRA+ BB was preferred by 39.3% of physicians, ACEi/ARNi + SGLT2 inhibitors + BB by 33.3%, and ACEi/ARNi + BB by 22.2%. The time required to initiate and optimize GDMT was estimated to be <1 month by 8.3%, 1-3 months by 52%, 3-6 months by 31.8%, and >6 months by 7.9%. Compared to general cardiologists, HF specialists/academic cardiologists reported lower estimated time-to-initiation, and more commonly preferred a parallel initiation of GDMT rather than a sequential approach. CONCLUSION: Participants generally followed diagnostic and treatment guidelines, but variations in HFrEF management across care settings or HF specialties were noted. The survey may raise awareness and promote standardized HF care.

Guideline-directed medical therapy implementation during hospitalization for cardiogenic shock.

AIMS: Despite significant morbidity and mortality, recent advances in cardiogenic shock (CS) management have been associated with increased survival. However, little is known regarding the management of patients who survive CS with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, HFrEF), and the utilization of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in these patients has not been well described. To fill this gap, we investigated the use of GDMT during an admission for CS and short-term outcomes using the Inova single-centre shock registry. METHODS: We investigated the implementation of GDMT for patients who survived an admission for CS with HFrEF using data from our single-centre shock registry from January 2017 to December 2019. Baseline characteristics, discharge clinical status, data on GDMT utilization and 30 day, 6 month and 12 month patient outcomes were collected by retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Among 520 patients hospitalized for CS during the study period, 185 (35.6%) had HFrEF upon survival to discharge. The median age was 64 years [interquartile range (IQR) 56, 70], 72% (n = 133) were male, 22% (n = 40) were Black and 7% (n = 12) were Hispanic. Forty-one per cent of patients (n = 76) presented with shock related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), while 59% (n = 109) had HF-related CS (HF-CS). The median length of hospital stay was 12 days (IQR 7, 18). At discharge, the proportions of patients on beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs)/angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) were 78% (n = 144), 58% (n = 107) and 55% (n = 101), respectively. Utilization of three-drug GDMT was 33.0% (n = 61). Ten per cent of CS survivors with HFrEF (n = 19) were not prescribed any component of GDMT at discharge. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for baseline GDMT use revealed that patients with lower LVEF and those who transferred to our centre from an outside hospital were more likely to experience GDMT addition (P < 0.05). Patients prescribed at least one additional class of GDMT during admission had higher odds of 6 month and 1 year survival (P < 0.01): On average, 6 month survival odds were 7.1 times greater [confidence interval (CI) 1.9, 28.5] and 1 year survival odds were 6.0 times greater than those who did not have at least one GDMT added (CI 1.9, 20.5). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who survived CS admission with HFrEF in this single-centre CS registry were not prescribed all classes or goal doses of GDMT at hospital discharge. These findings highlight an urgent need to augment multidisciplinary efforts to enhance the post-discharge medical management and outcomes of patients who survive CS with HFrEF.

Clinical outcomes of patients from older community hospitalized for heart failure in guideline-directed medical therapy era: Insights from the COMPASS-HF registry.

BACKGROUND: Despite strong recommendations in the latest guidelines for implementing guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) before discharge, there is a lack of data on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of older patients with heart failure (HF). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with HF in a super-aging society during the GDMT era. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the COMPASS-HF study including 305 consecutive hospitalized patients, 177 with acute HF were identified through a medical record review. The mean age of the enrolled patients was 86.2 years, and 46.3 % were men. The mean simple GDMT score, which is recognized as a useful prognostic tool for Japanese patients with HF, was 5.0. The incidences of all-cause death and HF hospitalization were 46.5 % and 19.4 %, respectively. The incidences of all-cause death and cardiovascular death were significantly lower in the high simple GDMT score group (≥5 points) than in the low simple GDMT score group (≤4 points) (p = 0.049 and p = 0.044, respectively). However, no significant differences were noted in HF hospitalization and composite events (cardiovascular death and HF hospitalization) between the groups (p = 0.564 and p = 0.086, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: While GDMT was well-implemented in the older community, the mortality rate among hospitalized patients with HF remained high. Although GDMT appears to have reduced the HF hospitalization rate, further validation and development of an optimal predictive model for elderly patients with HF are essential. X (FORMERLY TWITTER): In the older community, although the short- and long-term mortality of hospitalized patients with HF is still high even in the GDMT era, the HF hospitalization rate is suppressed, probably due to GDMT. A simple GDMT score may also be useful for stratifying the prognosis of older patients with HF. #HeartFailure#Mortality#GDMT#Fantastic4.

Heart failure in Europe: Guideline-directed medical therapy use and decision making in chronic and acute, pre-existing and de novo, heart failure with reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved ejection fraction - the ESC EORP Heart Failure III Registry.

AIMS: We analysed baseline characteristics and guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use and decisions in the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Heart Failure (HF) III Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1 November 2018 and 31 December 2020, 10 162 patients with acute HF (AHF, 39%, age 70 [62-79], 36% women) or outpatient visit for HF (61%, age 66 [58-75], 33% women), with HF with reduced (HFrEF, 57%), mildly reduced (HFmrEF, 17%) or preserved (HFpEF, 26%) ejection fraction were enrolled from 220 centres in 41 European or ESC-affiliated countries. With AHF, 97% were hospitalized, 2.2% received intravenous treatment in the emergency department, and 0.9% received intravenous treatment in an outpatient clinic. AHF was seen by most by a general cardiologist (51%) and outpatient HF most by a HF specialist (48%). A majority had been hospitalized for HF before, but 26% of AHF and 6.1% of outpatient HF had de novo HF. Baseline use, initiation and discontinuation of GDMT varied according to AHF versus outpatient HF, de novo versus pre-existing HF, and by ejection fraction. After the AHF event or outpatient HF visit, use of any renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist and loop diuretics was 89%, 29%, 92%, 78%, and 85% in HFrEF; 89%, 9.7%, 90%, 64%, and 81% in HFmrEF; and 77%, 3.1%, 80%, 48%, and 80% in HFpEF. CONCLUSION: Use and initiation of GDMT was high in cardiology centres in Europe, compared to previous reports from cohorts and registries including more primary care and general medicine and regions more local or outside of Europe and ESC-affiliated countries.

Medical Therapy and Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac Sarcoidosis Patients With Systolic Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) may result in systolic heart failure (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF]), but its response to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains uncertain. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated 881 patients evaluated for CS to identify those with diagnosed CS, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% at diagnosis, and follow-up echocardiogram within 11-24 months. Demographics, LVEF, GDMT as quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization (KCMO) score, and immunosuppressive treatment were recorded. The primary outcome was a composite of event-free survival (unplanned heart failure hospitalization, left ventricular assist device [LVAD]/heart transplant, or death). Seventy-nine (9%) CS patients met the inclusion criteria (35% female, median age 57 years, mean LVEF 30.9%, median New York Heart Association class II [46%], mean number of GDMT agents 1.7, and mean KCMO score 31.8). Most (87%) were treated with immunosuppressive treatment. At follow-up (median 16 months), the mean number of GDMT agents increased to 2.2 (P=0.02), and the mean KCMO score to 70.1 (P<0.001). Mean LVEF improved to 39.9% (excluding LVAD/transplant; P<0.001) and the change in LVEF was correlated with follow-up KCMO score (P<0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 13 (16%) patients and differed by KCMO score (log-rank P<0.001), but not by immunosuppressive treatment (log-rank P=0.36). CONCLUSIONS: GDMT optimization is associated with better cardiac remodeling and clinical outcomes in CS patients with HFrEF.

How to utilize current guidelines to manage patients with cancer at high risk for heart failure.

Heart failure (HF) in patients with cancer is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The success of cancer therapy has resulted in an exponential rise in the population of cancer survivors, however cardiovascular disease (CVD) is now a major life limiting condition more than 5 years after cancer diagnosis [Sturgeon, Deng, Bluethmann, et al 40(48):3889-3897, 2019]. Prevention and early detection of CVD, including cardiomyopathy (CM) and HF is of paramount importance. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published guidelines on Cardio-Oncology (CO) [Lyon, López-Fernández, Couch, et al 43(41):4229-4361, 2022] detailing cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification, prevention, monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment throughout the course and following completion of cancer therapy. Here we utilize a case to summarize aspects of the ESC guideline relevant to HF clinicians, with a focus on risk stratification, early detection, prevention of CM and HF, and the role for guideline directed medical therapy in patients with cancer.

In-Hospital Mortality and Treatment in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome With and Without Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Findings From the CCC-ACS Project.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute coronary syndrome without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs; hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, diabetes) have not been well studied, with little known about their characteristics, quality of care, or outcomes. We sought to systematically analyze patients with ACS without SMuRFs, especially to evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy for these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) project (2014-2019), we examined the presence and absence of SMuRFs and features among 89 462 patients with initial acute coronary syndrome. The main outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Among eligible patients, 11.0% had none of the SMuRFs (SMuRF-less). SMuRF-less patients had higher in-hospital mortality (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.49 [95% CI, 1.19-1.87]). After adjustment for clinical characteristics and treatments, the associations between SMuRF status and in-hospital mortality persisted (adjusted HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.07-1.70]). Guideline-directed optimal medical therapy (receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, ß-blockers, and statins) was not associated with lower mortality (adjusted HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.58-1.67]) in SMuRF-less patients, unlike the association in patients with SMuRFs (adjusted HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.66-0.98]). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with these results. CONCLUSIONS: SMuRF-less patients were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. Guideline-directed medical therapy was less effective in SMuRF-less patients than in patients with SMuRFs. Dedicated studies are needed to confirm the optimal therapy for SMuRF-less patients. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02306616.

Insights on prevalence and incidence of anemia and rapid up-titration of oral heart failure treatment from the STRONG-HF study.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is one of the most frequent comorbidities in patients with heart failure (HF), which potentially can interfere with the effect of guideline-recommended HF medical therapy and can be associated with the use of neurohormonal blockers. AIM: The aim of this analysis was to determine the prevalence and changes of anemia status in the STRONG-HF study, its association with clinical endpoints, and possible interaction of the presence of anemia with the efficacy and safety of high-intensity HF treatment. METHODS: The design and main results of the study have been previously described. Patients were randomized within 2 days prior to anticipated hospital discharge after HF worsening in a 1:1 fashion to either high-intensity care (HIC) or usual care (UC). Baseline characteristics, clinical and safety outcomes, and treatment effect of HIC vs. UC on the primary and secondary outcomes were compared in groups based on baseline anemia. In addition, dynamics of hemoglobin during the study follow-up and predictors of incident anemia at 90 days were investigated. RESULTS: The proportion of anemia in 1077 STRONG-HF patients at enrollment was 27.2%, while at 90 days, it changed to 32.1%. The primary composite outcome occurred in 18.2% of patients without baseline anemia, and 22.5% of patients with baseline anemia (unadjusted HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.90-1.80), a difference that did not reach statistical significance. However, patients with baseline anemia had significantly less improvement of EQ-VAS questionnaire values from baseline to day 90 (adjusted LS-Mean difference -2.34 (-4.37, -0.31), P = 0.02). During the study, anemia developed in 19.4 and 14.6% in HIC and UC groups, respectively. The opposite phenomenon-recovery of anemia-occurred in 27.6 and 28.8% in HIC and UC groups (P = 0.1379). The predictors of incident anemia at 90 days were male sex, geographical region other than Europe, ischemic etiology, higher glucose, and elevated uric acid at baseline. The percentages of optimal doses of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were not different between anemic and non-anemic patients. High-intensity care strategy did not increase rate of incident anemia at 90 days and reduced the rate of primary and secondary endpoints regardless of baseline hemoglobin. CONCLUSION: Hemoglobin level and status of anemia have a dynamic nature in the acute HF patients in the post-discharge period dependent on multiple factors. High-intensity HF treatment is safe and beneficial regardless of baseline hemoglobin level and presence of anemia. The improvement of quality of life is significantly lower in anemic HF patients implying specific attention to correction of this condition.

Use of Guideline-Recommended Heart Failure Drugs in High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Optimal use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) can prevent hospitalization and mortality among patients with heart failure (HF). We aimed to assess the prevalence of GDMT use for HF across geographic regions and country-income levels. We systematically reviewed observational studies (published between January 2010 and October 2020) involving patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses to obtain summary estimates. We included 334 studies comprising 1,507,849 patients (31% female). The majority (82%) of studies were from high-income countries, with Europe (45%) and the Americas (33%) being the most represented regions, and Africa (1%) being the least. Overall prevalence of GDMT use was 80% (95% CI 78%-81%) for ß-blockers, 82% (80%-83%) for renin-angiotensin-system inhibitors, and 41% (39%-43%) for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. We observed an exponential increase in GDMT use over time after adjusting for country-income levels (p < 0.0001), but significant gaps persist in low- and middle-income countries. Multi-level interventions are needed to address health-system, provider, and patient-level barriers to GDMT use.

Impact of beta-blocker uptitration on patients after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for secondary mitral regurgitation: The OCEAN-mitral registry.

BACKGROUND: Optimal medical therapy for patients with secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the association between beta-blocker uptitration and clinical outcomes after M-TEER. METHODS: Using data from the Japanese multicenter registry, we examined 1474 patients who underwent M-TEER for SMR between April 2018 and June 2021. Beta-blocker uptitration was defined as an increased dose of beta-blockers 1 month after M-TEER compared with that before M-TEER. The 2-year clinical outcomes were compared between patients with and without beta-blocker uptitration, utilizing multivariable Cox regression analyses and propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Of the 1474 patients who underwent M-TEER, 272 (18.4 %) were receiving increasing doses of beta-blockers at the 1-month follow-up. These patients had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Most patients in the beta-blocker uptitration group received less than the target dose of beta-blockers. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that beta-blocker uptitration was significantly associated with a lower risk of all-cause (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.84; P = 0.006) and cardiovascular mortalities (adjusted HR: 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.26-0.79, P = 0.006). PSM analyses revealed consistent findings. Subgroup analyses revealed a significant interaction between beta-blocker uptitration and LVEF≤40 % (interaction P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SMR, beta-blocker uptitration after M-TEER was associated with better clinical outcomes, especially in the group with an LVEF≤40 %. Efforts to uptitrate guideline-directed medical therapy after M-TEER for SMR may be necessary, even if reaching the target dose proves challenging.

Guideline-directed medical therapy prescribing patterns and in-hospital outcomes among heart failure patients during COVID-19.

Study objective: The association of prior to admission guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) use in patients hospitalized with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF, ejection fraction ≤40 %) and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) with in-hospital outcomes has not been well studied. Design/setting/participants/interventions/outcome measures: Using the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines Heart Failure Registry, we identified HFrEF patients presenting with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and compared rates of GDMT prescription between those presenting prior to and during the pandemic. In a subgroup of patients with a concomitant COVID-19 diagnosis, we evaluated the association of prior to admission GDMT use with in-hospital mortality and severe COVID-19. Results: 23,899 patients were admitted with HFrEF during the pandemic (2/16/20-3/24/21) and 26,459 patients were admitted in the year prior (2/16/19-2/15/20). In this overall cohort, prior to admission ACEI/ARB/ARNI (45.6 % vs 48.1 %, p < 0.0001) and BB (56.9 % vs 62.4 %, p < 0.0001) use was lower among admitted HFrEF patients during the pandemic when compared to the year prior. Rates of ACEI/ARB/ARNI, MRA, and triple therapy (ACE/ARB/ARNI + BB + MRA) prescription at discharge were higher during the pandemic compared to the year prior. Among a subgroup of those with HFrEF and COVID-19 (n = 333), prior to admission GDMT use was not associated with in-hospital mortality or severe COVID-19. Conclusion: We found no association between prior to admission GDMT use and in-hospital mortality or severe COVID-19 among HFrEF patients admitted with ADHF and COVID-19. GDMT prescription at discharge for HFrEF patients overall has remained either similar or improved during the pandemic.

Protocol-driven approach to guideline-directed medical therapy optimization for heart failure: A real-world application to recovery.

The objective of our study was to evaluate the real-world effects of an aggressive, personalized protocol for guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) titration in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We conducted a two-center retrospective cohort study. Patients with HFrEF who presented to a HF clinic from January 2020 to December 2022 were placed on a GDMT protocol. 180 patients were included in the study. Mean GDMT score significantly increased from 4.7 to 5.9 (p < 0.001) between initial and final visits. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) significantly increased from 28 % to 33 % (+5 %, p < 0.001). 27 (15.7 %) of the 172 patients with complete New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification data had improvement by at least 1 class, while 2 (1.2 %) patients had worsening NYHA classification. 140 (77.8 %) patients had no unplanned hospitalizations between visits. 21 (11.7 %) patients had an unplanned hospitalization for acute HF during the study period with a mean time from first clinic visit to hospitalization of 183 days (range: 13-821 days). 2 (1.1 %) patients were hospitalized due to GDMT-associated adverse drug events (i.e. hypotension, hyperkalemia). 7 (3.9 %) patients died during the study period, which was lower than the predicted 1-year death rate for our cohort (12.3 %) using the MAGGIC score. In conclusion, an aggressive, personalized protocol for GDMT titration in patients with HFrEF led to significant improvements in LVEF, NYHA classification, hospitalization, and mortality in a real-world setting. This protocol may help serve as a road map to lessen the gap between clinical knowledge and practice surrounding optimization of GDMT and move HFrEF patients toward a path to recovery.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024.

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

Impact of guideline directed medical therapy on myocardial function in adults with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Guideline-directed heart failure therapy with angiotensin receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) and sodium-glucose transporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been incrementally beneficial in improving outcomes in heart failure patients. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in adults congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, ACHD patients with either New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II symptoms or systemic ejection fraction (EF) <45%, optimized on a combination of beta-blocker (BB), ARNi, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and SGLT2i were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with a mean age 42.6 ± 12.1 years prescribed GDMT were identified. Twenty-eight (61%) were male, 20 (43%) had a systemic right ventricle (RV) and 9 (20%) had single-ventricle physiology. Over the optimization period, 20 (43%) were sustained on ARNi and 42 (91%) on SGLT2i in addition to treatment with BB and MRA. Over a period of 45 weeks, echocardiography parameters for left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (+7.5%, p = 0.006), systemic ventricle (SV) velocity time integral (VTI) (+1.9 cm, p = 0.012) and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-2.5%, p = 0.005) improved when 3-4 medications were used versus 1-2 medications alone. The use of either ARNi or SGLT2i (+8.1%, p = 0.017) or in combination (+7.0%, p = 0.043) increased LVEF compared to the use of neither medication. CONCLUSION: Combination GDMT is beneficial in improving myocardial characteristics in ACHD patients with systemic RV and LV.