Immunotherapy in melanoma: advances, pitfalls, and future perspectives.

Cutaneous melanoma is the deadliest and most aggressive form of skin cancer owing to its high capacity for metastasis. Over the past few decades, the management of this type of malignancy has undergone a significant revolution with the advent of both targeted therapies and immunotherapy, which have greatly improved patient quality of life and survival. Nevertheless, the response rates are still unsatisfactory for the presence of side effects and development of resistance mechanisms. In this context, tumor microenvironment has emerged as a factor affecting the responsiveness and efficacy of immunotherapy, and the study of its interplay with the immune system has offered new promising clinical strategies. This review provides a brief overview of the currently available immunotherapeutic strategies for melanoma treatment by analyzing both the positive aspects and those that require further improvement. Indeed, a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the immune evasion of melanoma cells, with particular attention on the role of the tumor microenvironment, could provide the basis for improving current therapies and identifying new predictive biomarkers.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastases harboring targetable mutations.

Background: Driver gene-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are prone to develop leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), leading to an extremely high mortality. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatments for patients with NSCLC and LM harboring targetable mutations. Methods: We retrospectively collected records of patients with NSCLC harboring targetable mutations and prescribed ICIs following the diagnosis of LM at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University. In addition, we reviewed relevant literature and enrolled patients who met the inclusion criteria. Clinical characteristics were statistically analyzed, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were employed to assess the median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS). Results: A total of 37 patients with NSCLC harboring targetable mutations who received ICIs after LM diagnosis were included. The median age of the enrolled patients was 54 years (range, 33-70 years), and 62.2% were female. Following ICI administration, the intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and intracranial disease control rate (iDCR) for all enrolled patients were 18.9% and 62.2%, respectively. The mPFS of all patients was 2.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.166-2.834 months] and the mOS was 5.8 months (95% CI: 5.087-6.513 months). Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed a significant increase in mOS or individuals who had previously undergone cranial radiation therapy compared to those who had not. Furthermore, different histology molecular types were found to be potentially associated with survival time. Conclusions: Some patients with NSCLC harboring targetable gene mutations following LM diagnosis may benefit from ICI treatment with relatively good tolerance. However, further screening of the most suitable patient populations for ICIs is required.

Prognostic relevance of immune-related adverse events in lung cancer patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) work by activating the immune system, a mechanism that may also cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This study seeks to investigate on how different irAEs impact prognosis of advanced lung cancer (LC) patients and identify useful approaches to manage irAEs. Methods: A thorough literature search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and manual searches up to January 2024 were undertaken. Treatment outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were obtained. Meta-analysis was conducted using R software (version 4.3.1). Results: There were 106 studies with 41,050 advanced or recurrent LC patients included. The occurrence of irAEs was correlated with better PFS [hazard ratio (HR) =0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.59], OS (HR =0.57; 0.51-0.63), ORR [risk ratio (RR) =2.03; 95% CI: 1.81-2.28] and DCR (RR =1.55; 95% CI: 1.40-1.72) and remained significant after adjusting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) level. IrAEs affecting skin (OS: HR =0.45; 95% CI: 0.38-0.53) and endocrine system (OS: HR =0.51; 95% CI: 0.41-0.62), of mild severity (OS: HR =0.52; 95% CI: 0.35-0.79), arising in multiple sites (OS: HR =0.47; 95% CI: 0.38-0.59), induced by monotherapy (OS: HR =0.58; 95% CI: 0.52-0.65), with a delayed onset (cutoff: 3 months; OS: HR =0.37; 95% CI: 0.19-0.71) were identified as positive prognostic markers. In contrast, though pulmonary irAEs were found to be corelated with enhanced treatment response (ORR: RR =1.75; 95% CI: 1.37-2.25), they may harm survival, especially those with grade ≥3 (OS: HR =2.40; 95% CI: 1.39-4.14). Treatment resumption tended to improve PFS but might not reduce the risk of death compared to permanent discontinuation. Conclusions: IrAEs suggest better treatment outcomes generally, yet severe pneumonia could increase mortality risk. Close supervision and appropriate handling protocols are warranted to weigh treatment benefit against risk.

Association between thymus density loss and efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Background: Although the thymus undergoes degeneration with the advancement of age, recent studies have continuously revealed that the thymus possesses the potential for regeneration and may reverse this aging trend. Furthermore, an increasing number of studies indicate an association between thymus function and immunotherapy. Considering that lung cancer patients typically undergo chest computed tomography (CT) scans during treatment, this provides convenient conditions for us to observe thymic remodeling through imaging data. Therefore, exploring the changes in the thymus on CT images is of great significance for understanding its relationship with the efficacy of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study investigated the CT imaging characteristics of thymic density changes in patients with advanced NSCLC after immunotherapy. The primary objective was to determine whether changes in thymic density are predictors of response to immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC. Methods: A total of 412 patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent immunotherapy were included. Thymic density measurements were taken initially and after immunotherapy, with the annualized change calculated. Comprehensive analysis, including disease progression, survival, and subgroup assessments, was conducted. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: The annual change in density of the thymic region ranged from -108 to 108 HU after the initiation of ICIs. Patients were categorized into "loss" or "non-loss" groups (210 vs. 202) based on thymic density changes. Analysis of short-term progression of solid tumors revealed no statistically significant differences in ORR (P=0.55) and DCR (P=0.67) between the two groups. Throughout the entire follow-up period, 41 patients (19.5%) in the "loss" group and 64 patients (31.7%) in the "non-loss" group died. Thymic density reduction was not associated with PFS (P=0.08), but it was positively associated with increased OS (P=0.003). The results were consistent across subgroups. Conclusions: Thymic density changes were observed in nearly all NSCLC patients undergoing immunotherapy, with decreased density associated with longer OS. These findings suggest a potential association between thymic density changes and immune efficacy in NSCLC immunotherapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors as subsequent treatment in older adults with non-small cell lung cancer and synchronous brain metastases.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the mainstay treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is a lack of studies assessing ICIs as subsequent treatment in older adults with NSCLC and brain metastasis (BM). This retrospective cohort study compared the real-world survival of older patients with NSCLC and BM at diagnosis [synchronous BM (SBM)] previously treated with chemotherapy receiving ICI versus chemotherapy as subsequent treatment. Methods: Patients with NSCLC and SBM ≥65 years previously treated with chemotherapy were identified using the SEER-Medicare database (2010-2019). Patients receiving new chemotherapy and/or Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ICIs as second/third-line treatment were included, excluding those ever-receiving targeted therapies. Each ICI patient was matched to one chemotherapy patient by time to subsequent treatment (within ±30 days) from diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) time was measured from the start of subsequent treatment to death, censored at disenrollment from Medicare Part A/B, enrollment in Part C, or end of study (December 31, 2019), whichever came first. OS curves were estimated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and log-rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) was estimated using a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Matched cohorts included 546 patients [273 in each group; median age 71 (range, 65-87) years]. ICI patients were older, more likely non-Hispanic, with squamous cell carcinoma, and liver metastasis compared to chemotherapy. KM estimated better survival in ICI than chemotherapy {median survival: 209 days [95% confidence interval (CI): 160-275] vs. 155 days (95% CI: 135-187); log-rank P<0.001}. ICI was associated with a lower adjusted hazard of death [HR =0.63; 95% CI: 0.52-0.75; P<0.001] compared to subsequent chemotherapy treatment. Conclusions: In this population-based study of older patients with NSCLC and SBM previously treated with chemotherapy, subsequent treatment with ICI was associated with improved survival compared to chemotherapy.

Efficacy of avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma with histologic subtype and divergent differentiation: a multicenter retrospective study conducted by the Uro-Oncology Group in Kyushu.

Background: The subtype of urothelial carcinoma (SUC) has been known to possess morphological diversity for histologic subtype or divergent differentiation. However, the efficacy of avelumab against SUC remains unclear. Therefore, the effect of the treatment as well as the survival results of avelumab monotherapy were evaluated as a first-line therapeutic maintenance in patients with advanced SUC. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on consecutive patients from the Uro-Oncology Group in Kyushu study population with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer who underwent avelumab maintenance therapy without progression after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients with pure urothelial carcinoma (PUC) and SUC were comparatively analyzed based on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Out of 49 recorded patients, 38 and 11 had PUC and SUC, respectively. The most common subtype element was glandular differentiation (n=5), followed by squamous differentiation (n=3), micropapillary (n=1), and plasmacytoid subtypes (n=1). The SUC and PUC groups had comparable ORR (0% vs. 2.6%, P>0.99) and disease control rates (54.5% vs. 44.7%, P=0.73). These patient groups also showed no significant difference in PFS (median 3.9 vs. 3.1 months, P=0.33) or OS (median 16.7 vs. 22.1 months, P=0.47). Conclusions: The response of SUC and PUC to avelumab was comparable in patients with advanced lower and upper urinary tract cancer, indicating that avelumab maintenance therapy is also effective for SUC.

The impact of sarcopenia on the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer and potential strategies to overcome resistance.

Recent studies have revealed that sarcopenia can adversely affect the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PD-1 inhibitors are immune checkpoint inhibitors widely used in the treatment of various cancers. However, NSCLC patients may have poorer outcomes when receiving PD-1 inhibitor treatment, and sarcopenia may affect the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors through immune and metabolic mechanisms. In this article, we summarize the reported negative impact of sarcopenia on the effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC in recent years. Based on existing research results, we analyze the possible mechanisms by which sarcopenia affects the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors and discuss possible strategies to address this issue. This could help to understand the impact of sarcopenia on the treatment of PD-1 inhibitors and provide more accurate expectations of treatment outcomes for clinicians and patients. Additionally, we present tailored intervention strategies for sarcopenic patients undergoing PD-1 inhibitor therapy, aiming to optimize treatment efficacy and enhance patient quality of life. Nevertheless, further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms through which sarcopenia impacts PD-1 inhibitors and to identify more efficacious intervention approaches for improving the effectiveness of PD-1 inhibitor treatment in sarcopenic patients.

The current status and future of targeted-immune combination for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and the third leading cause of death worldwide. surgery, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), systemic therapy, local ablation therapy, radiotherapy, and targeted drug therapy with agents such as sorafenib. However, the tumor microenvironment of liver cancer has a strong immunosuppressive effect. Therefore, new treatments for liver cancer are still necessary. Immune checkpoint molecules, such as programmed death-1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), along with high levels of immunosuppressive cytokines, induce T cell inhibition and are key mechanisms of immune escape in HCC. Recently, immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as monotherapy or in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, anti-angiogenesis drugs, chemotherapy agents, and topical therapies has offered great promise in the treatment of liver cancer. In this review, we discuss the latest advances in ICIs combined with targeted drugs (targeted-immune combination) and other targeted-immune combination regimens for the treatment of patients with advanced HCC (aHCC) or unresectable HCC (uHCC), and provide an outlook on future prospects. The literature reviewed spans the last five years and includes studies identified using keywords such as "hepatocellular carcinoma," "immune checkpoint inhibitors," "targeted therapy," "combination therapy," and "immunotherapy".

Mechanism research of non-coding RNA in immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapies for tumors of different systems have attained significant achievements and have changed the current situation of tumor treatment due to their therapeutic characteristics of high specificity and low side effects. The immune checkpoint Programmed death 1/Programmed cell death-Ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis exerts a vital role in the immune escape of tumor cells. As a result, it has become a key target for tumor immunotherapy. Therefore, to perfect research into potential regulatory factors for the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, in order to understand and illustrate tumor ICI therapy mechanisms, is a significant goal. Moreover, ncRNA has been verified to regulate the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in the tumor immune microenvironment to regulate tumor genesis and development. ncRNAs can improve or decrease the efficacy of ICI therapy by modulating PD-L1 expression. This review aimed to investigate the mechanisms of action of ncRNA in regulating the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in ICI therapy, to provide more efficient immunotherapy for tumors of different systems.

Heterogeneity of lymphocyte subsets in predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment response in advanced lung cancer: an analysis across different pathological types, therapeutic drugs, and age groups.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has become pivotal in the treatment of advanced lung cancer, yet the absence of reliable biomarkers for assessing treatment response poses a significant challenge. This study aims to explore the predictive value of various lymphocyte subsets in different lung cancer subtypes, thus potentially identifying novel biomarkers to improve ICI treatment stratification and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 146 stage III or IV lung cancer patients undergoing ICI treatment. The study focused on exploring the relationship between various lymphocyte subsets and the efficacy of ICIs, aiming to determine their predictive value for post-treatment outcomes. Results: Subgroup analysis revealed a positive correlation (P=0.01) between lower CD3+CD8+ T lymphocyte levels and treatment response in squamous cell carcinoma patients. However, no significance was observed in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Additionally, the predictive ability of lymphocyte subsets for different immunotherapy drugs varies. In individuals receiving anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatment, a lower CD3+CD8+ T lymphocyte levels is significantly associated with a positive treatment outcome (P=0.002), while there is no difference for programmed death 1 (PD-1) drugs. Among patients under 60, higher expression of CD3+CD4+ T lymphocytes (P=0.03) combined with lower CD3+CD8+ T lymphocyte levels (P=0.006) showed a statistically significant association with improved treatment response. However, in patients aged over 60, no discernible correlation was ascertained between lymphocyte subsets and therapeutic response. Through prognostic analysis, two distinct lymphocyte subsets were identified, both exerting considerable impact on progression-free survival subsequent to ICIs treatment: CD3+CD4+ T lymphocytes [hazard ratio (HR) =0.50, P=0.006] and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes (HR =1.78, P=0.02). Conclusions: Our findings underscore the significant heterogeneity in the predictive value of distinct lymphocyte subsets for lung cancer patients undergoing ICI treatment. These findings are particularly salient when considering various pathological types, immunotherapeutic agents, and patient age groups.

First-line treatments for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy: a China-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of imported immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as atezolizumab and durvalumab, and domestic ICIs like serplulimab and adebrelimab, in combination with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in China. Methods: Using a 21-day cycle length and a 20-year time horizon, a Markov model was established to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of five first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, as well as against each other, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Transition probabilities were estimated by combining the results of the CAPSTONE-1 trial and a published network meta-analysis. Cost and health state utilities were collected from multiple sources. Both cost and effectiveness outcomes were discounted at a rate of 5% annually. The primary model output was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A series of sensitivity analyses were preformed to assess the robustness of the model. Results: In the base-case analysis, the addition of first-line ICIs to chemotherapy resulted in the ICERs ranged from $80,425.31/QALY to $812,415.46/QALY, which exceeded the willing-to-pay threshold set for the model. When comparing these first-line immunochemotherapy strategies, serplulimab plus chemotherapy had the highest QALYs of 1.51286 and the second lowest costs of $60,519.52, making it is the most cost-effective strategy. Our subgroup-level analysis yielded results that are consistent with the base-case analysis. The sensitivity analysis results confirmed the validity and reliability of the model. Conclusion: In China, the combination of fist-line ICIs plus chemotherapy were not considered cost-effective when compared to chemotherapy alone. However, when these fist-line immunochemotherapy strategies were compared with each other, first-line serplulimab plus chemotherapy consistently demonstrated superiority in terms of cost-effectiveness. Reducing the cost of serplulimab per 4.5 mg/kg would be a realistic step towards making first-line serplulimab plus chemotherapy more accessible and cost-effective.

Efficacy and safety of molecularly targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable or recurrent/metastatic oral cancer in Japan.

Background/purpose: For unresectable recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer, pembrolizumab alone or pembrolizumab combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is the first-line therapy, depending on the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS). However, this is based on clinical studies of head and neck cancer, and few similar studies have been conducted on oral cancer alone. This study aimed to investigate the current status of pharmacotherapy for unresectable, recurrent, or metastatic oral cancer. Materials and methods: Patients with unresectable or recurrent/metastatic oral cancer who received cetuximab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab as first-line treatment were reviewed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), PFS 2 (PFS2), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and immune-related adverse events were obtained from medical records. Results: A total of 155 patients were enrolled from six hospitals. The ORR in the nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and cetuximab groups was 17.2 %, 4.2 %, and 21.6 %, respectively, and the DCR was 37.9 %, 41.7 %, and 58.8 %, respectively. Median OS in nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and cetuximab groups was 10.3, 9.5, and 11.1 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed in survival among the three groups. The small number of cases and the retrospective nature of the study precluded the determination of the more effective first-line treatment among the three drugs. Conclusion: The current statuses of nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and cetuximab in unresectable recurrent metastatic oral cancer was reported.

Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after severe immune-related adverse events: a retrospective analysis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) present clinicians with the challenge of managing immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can range from mild to severe due to immune system activation 1. While guidelines recommend discontinuing ICIs for grade 3 partial and all grade 4 irAEs, there is growing interest in rechallenging patients based on oncological outcomes, particularly for cardiovascular and neurological irAEs where data remains scarce 1,2. We retrospectively evaluated the safety of ICI rechallenge following grade 3-4 irAEs, specifically focusing on cardiovascular and neurological events, in patients discussed at our multidisciplinary immunotoxicity assessment board between 2019 and 2021. Fifteen patients were included, with a median time to severe irAE onset of 49 days. Among them, five patients experienced neurological adverse events (NAEs): aseptic meningitis (3), inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy (1), and ophthalmoplegia (1), while one patient presented with myocarditis. Of the 15 patients retreated with ICIs after initial severe irAEs, 11 (73%) remained free of subsequent irAEs, two (13%) experienced recurrence of the initial irAE, and two (13%) developed new irAEs distinct from the initial event. The median time to event recurrence was 69 days, occurring no earlier than the initial severe irAE. In the subset analysis focusing on severe cardiovascular and neurological irAEs, rechallenge with ICIs was generally well tolerated. However, one patient treated with anti-PD1 experienced a relapse of grade 2 aseptic meningitis. Overall, our findings suggest that rechallenging with ICIs after severe irAEs, including those affecting the cardiovascular and neurological systems, may be safe, particularly after irAE regression and corticosteroid withdrawal.

Efficacy and safety of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy for recurrent extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) no longer are approved for second-line or later treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and have not been studied in combination with chemotherapy. Exploring the efficacy and safety of second-line or later immunotherapy for ES-SCLC is an urgent clinical question that needs to be addressed, and combination therapies are an important research direction. This study intended to investigate the efficacy and safety of the sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy as a second-line and beyond treatment option for ES-SCLC. Methods: Medical records of patients who received treatment with sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone as a second-line or beyond therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The study evaluated efficacy and safety. Indicators of efficacy included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety indicators included adverse events (AEs). Results: This cohort comprised of 46 patients: 24 in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group and 22 in the chemotherapy group. Chemotherapy received by both groups was either albumin-bound paclitaxel or irinotecan. Compared with the chemotherapy group, the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group had higher ORR and DCR (ORR: 37.5% vs. 9.1%, P=0.04; DCR: 75.0% vs. 40.9%, P=0.04), and significantly prolonged PFS and OS [median PFS (mPFS): 5.07 vs. 2.45 months, P=0.006; median OS (mOS): 14.43 vs. 10.34 months, P=0.009]. Also, there was no significant increase in the incidence of AEs in the sintilimab combination chemotherapy group, which was well tolerated by patients. Conclusions: Sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy is superior to single-agent chemotherapeutic treatment as second-line or later therapy in ES-SCLC patients who have not received prior immunotherapy. These results need to be confirmed in future clinical trials.

Prognostic significance of immunotherapy in postoperative recurrent non-small cell lung cancer without EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements.

Background: Limited reports exist regarding postoperative recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without major driver mutations [epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements] treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) when programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is expressed in a real-world setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ICIs for those NSCLC. Methods: We enrolled 255 patients with postoperative recurrent NSCLC lacking EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements who underwent lobectomy or more extensive resection between 2012 and 2021. Factors associated with post-recurrence survival (PRS) were determined using the Cox proportional hazards model. PRS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. Results: Multivariable analysis demonstrated that squamous cell carcinoma, pathological stage III, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2 were significantly associated with worse PRS. Conversely, ICI use at first line was associated with improved PRS. Patients who used ICIs during the first line and subsequent therapies had better PRS than those who received chemotherapy alone. Among patients who used ICIs, there was no significant difference in response rate at the first line, nor in PRS among those with PD-L1 expression ≥50%, 1-49%, and <1% in surgically resected specimens. Conclusions: ICI use at any treatment line improved the PRS of NSCLC patients without major driver mutations, irrespective of PD-L1 expression, in a real-world setting.

Cardiovascular adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the cardiovascular safety of anticancer drug immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used in patients with malignant tumors. Methods: Four clinical research databases that have been completed since their establishment were searched, and the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of each indicator were statistically calculated. Results: 62 randomized controlled trial and controlled trials were included. In single drug treatment ICIs group, the overall risk of cardio cerebral Vascular disease at all levels was higher than that in the placebo/chemotherapy group. Especially in all grades of Myocarditis and above grade 3 compared with normal controls, except for pericardial lesions, other indicators have no obvious side effects. Conclusion: Single drug use of an anti-tumor ICIs may increase cardiovascular side effects risk in cancer patients, so we need to strengthen monitoring, identification and management, and timely intervention to manage ICI induced adverse events.

Deciphering the Correlation between the Emergence of Lung Carcinoma Associated with Tuberculosis-related Inflammation.

Lung cancer and tuberculosis (TB) are classified as the second-most life-threatening diseases globally. They both are exclusively represented as major public health risks and might exhibit similar symptoms, occasionally diagnosed simultaneously. Several epidemiological studies suggest that TB is a significant risk factor for the progression of lung cancer. The staggering mortality rates of pulmonary disorders are intrinsically connected to lung cancer and TB. Numerous factors play a pivotal role in the development of TB and may promote lung carcinogenesis, particularly among the geriatric population. Understanding the intricacies involved in the association between lung carcinogenesis and TB has become a crucial demand of current research. Consequently, this study aims to comprehensively review current knowledge on the relationship between tuberculosis-related inflammation and the emergence of lung carcinoma, highlighting the impact of persistent inflammation on lung tissue, immune modulation, fibrosis, aspects of reactive oxygen species, and an altered microenvironment that are linked to the progression of tuberculosis and subsequently trigger lung carcinoma.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The Evolving Role of Systemic Therapies as a Bridging Treatment to Liver Transplantation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths. Classically, liver transplantation (LT) can be curative for HCC tumors within the Milan criteria. Bridging strategies to reduce the dropouts from LT waiting lists and/or to downstage patients who are beyond the Milan criteria are widely utilized. We conducted a literature-based review to evaluate the role of systemic therapies as a bridging treatment to liver transplantation (LT) in HCC patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be used as a systemic bridging therapy to LT in patients with contraindications for locoregional liver-directed therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment can be utilized either as a monotherapy or as a combination therapy with bevacizumab or TKIs prior to LT. Acute rejection after liver transplantation is a concern in the context of ICI treatment. Thus, a safe ICI washout period before LT and cautious post-LT immunosuppression strategies are required to reduce post-LT rejections and to optimize clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials are needed to establish definitive conclusions about the utility of systemic therapy as a bridging modality prior to LT in HCC patients.

Acute kidney injury in cancer patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody vs. immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody (anti-VEGF) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy are commonly administered to cancer patients. Although cancer patients receiving anti-VEGF or ICIs have been reported to experience an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), comparative studies on the AKI incidence have not been evaluated. METHODS: Cancer patients receiving anti-VEGF or ICIs were retrospectively selected from the hospital information system of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University between Jan, 2020 and Dec, 2022 and were divided into two groups according to the treatment regimen: anti-VEGF group and ICIs group. The baseline characteristics were propensity-score matched. The primary outcome was sustained AKI. A comparison of cumulative incidence of sustained AKI was performed by Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Risks for outcomes were assessed using Cox proportional regression. RESULTS: A total of 1581 cancer patients receiving anti-VEGF (n = 696) or ICIs (n = 885) were included in the primary analysis. The ICIs group had a higher cumulative incidence of sustained AKI within one year than the anti-VEGF group (26.8% vs. 17.8%, P < 0.001). Among 1392 propensity score matched patients, ICIs therapy (n = 696) was associated with an increased risk of sustained AKI events in the entire population (HR 2.0; 95%CI 1.3 to 2.5; P = 0.001) and especially in those with genitourinary cancer (HR 4.2; 95%CI 1.3 to 13.2; P = 0.015). Baseline serum albumin level (> 35 g/l) was an important risk factor for a lower incidence of sustained AKI in the anti-VEGF group (HR 0.5; 95%CI 0.3 to 0.9; P = 0.027) and the ICIs group (HR 0.3; 95%CI 0.2 to 0.5; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among cancer patients in this real-world study, treatment with ICIs increased incidence of sustained AKI in one year. Baseline serum albumin level was an important risk factor for sustained AKI. The risk factors for sustained AKI differed between the anti-VEGF group and the ICIs group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06119347) on 11/06/2023.