Incidence and Predictors of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Japanese Ischemic Heart Disease Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in preventing sudden cardiac death is well established, the incidence and predictors of appropriate ICD therapy in Japanese ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively studied Japanese 141 IHD patients undergoing transvenous ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation for primary or secondary prevention at Hirosaki University Hospital. Over a mean (±SD) follow-up period of 5.5±2.8 years, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy was similar in the primary and secondary prevention groups, although it was relatively more frequent in the first 2 years in the secondary prevention group. Four patients died due to sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), mainly due to post-shock pulseless electrical activity. Once patients had received their first appropriate ICD therapy, 49.2% received second appropriate ICD therapy within 6 months. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that sustained VT as an index life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia before ICD/CRT-D implantation was an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy, but VF was not. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of appropriate ICD therapy was comparable in primary and secondary prevention among Japanese IHD patients. We need to recognize the high-risk period for second appropriate ICD therapy after the first therapy and sustained VT as index life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia as a risk factor for appropriate ICD therapy.

Benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator use in Japanese patients based on modified MADIT-ICD benefit score.

AIMS: The MADIT-ICD benefit score is used to stratify the risk of life-threatening arrhythmia and non-arrhythmic mortality. We sought to develop an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) benefit-prediction score for Japanese patients with ICDs. METHODS: Patients who underwent ICD implantation as primary prophylaxis were retrospectively enrolled. Based on their MADIT-ICD benefit scores, we developed a modified MADIT-ICD benefit score adapted to the Japanese population. The primary endpoints were appropriate ICD therapy and all-cause death without appropriate ICD therapy (non-arrhythmic death). We used the Fine and Gray multivariate model and Cox proportional hazard regression to identify factors for adjusting the MADIT-ICD benefit-risk score specifically for the Japanese population. The scoring points for the original MADIT-ICD benefit score were adjusted to optimal points based on the multivariate analysis results in the population. RESULTS: The study enrolled 167 patients [age, 61.9 ± 12.3 years; male individuals, 138 (82.6%); cardiac resynchronization therapy, 73 (43.7%); ischaemic cardiomyopathy, 53 (31.7%)]. Fourteen patients received anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy, and 23 received shock therapy as the initial appropriate ICD therapy. Non-arrhythmic deaths occurred in 37 patients. The original MADIT-ICD benefit score could not stratify non-arrhythmic mortality in the Japanese population. The patients were reclassified into three groups according to the modified MADIT-ICD benefit score. The modified MADIT-ICD benefit score could effectively stratify the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy and non-arrhythmic mortality. In the highest-benefit group, the 10 year cumulative rates of appropriate ICD therapy and non-arrhythmic mortality were 56.8% and 12.9%, respectively (P < 0.01). In the intermediate-benefit group, these rates were 20.2% and 40.2% (P = 0.01). In the lowest-benefit group, the incidence of non-arrhythmic deaths was 68.1%, and no patient received appropriate ICD therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The modified MADIT-ICD benefit score may be useful for stratifying ICD candidates in the Japanese population.

Innominate Vein Thrombosis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

The brachiocephalic vein (BCV), also known as the innominate vein, is a central vein in the upper chest formed by merging the internal jugular and subclavian veins. It plays a crucial role in venous return from the head, neck, and upper extremities and is significant in procedures such as pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement, chemotherapy ports, and central venous catheter insertions. The presence of foreign bodies and local malignancy are major risk factors for thrombosis in the BCV. As part of the deep venous system, BCV thrombosis (BCVT) is a rare condition but can lead to serious complications like superior vena cava syndrome and, rarely, pulmonary embolism. This case report presents an 82-year-old woman with a history of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, HIV, pulmonary embolism, systemic lupus erythematosus, and breast cancer who required an ICD placement due to persistent systolic dysfunction. During the procedure, chronic BCVT leading to the stenosis was incidentally discovered, necessitating urgent vascular intervention to establish venous patency. The patient's complex medical history, including previous chemotherapy through a central venous catheter, contributed to the risk factors for BCVT. The multidisciplinary approach led to successful ICD placement and the reinstatement of anticoagulation therapy. This case underscores the rarity and severity of BCVT and highlights the importance of pre-procedural imaging, such as CT venography, in patients with multiple risk factors. Additionally, the report suggests considering leadless ICD technology for patients with limited venous access to avoid complications. The findings emphasize the critical need for thorough evaluation and planning in complex cases to ensure successful outcomes.

Factors Associated With Non-Uptake of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Among Eligible Patients at a Tertiary Hospital in Kenya.

Background: Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) implantation in both primary and secondary prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD) in at-risk population is well established. ICD implantation rates remain low particularly in Africa with a paucity of data regarding factors associated with non-uptake. Objectives: The primary study objective was to determine the factors associated with non-uptake of ICD among heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF<35%). Reasons for ICD refusal among eligible patients were reviewed as a secondary objective. Methods: This was a retrospective study among HF patients eligible for ICD implantation evaluated between 2018 to 2020. Comparison between ICD recipient and non-recipient categories was made to establish determinants of non-uptake. Results: Of 206 eligible patients, only 69 (33.5%) had an ICD. Factors independently associated with non-uptake were lack of private insurance (42.3% vs 63.8%; p = 0.005), non-cardiology physician (16.1% vs 5.8%; p = 0.045) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (54.7% vs 36.4% p = 0.014). The most common (75%) reason for ICD refusal was inability to pay for the device. Conclusion: ICDs are underutilized among eligible HF with reduced EF patients in Kenya. The majority of patients without ICD had no private insurance, had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and non-cardiology primary physician. Early referral of HF with reduced EF patients to HF specialists to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy and make ICD recommendation is needed.

Management of Long QT Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a cardiac disorder characterized by prolonged repolarization of the heart's electrical cycle, which can be observed as an extended QT interval on an electrocardiogram (ECG). The safe and effective management of LQTS often necessitates a multifaceted approach encompassing pharmacological treatment, lifestyle modifications, and, in high-risk cases, the implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). Beta-blockers, particularly nadolol and propranolol, are foundational in treating LQTS, especially for high-risk patients, though ICDs are recommended for those with a history of cardiac arrest or recurrent arrhythmic episodes. Intermediate and low-risk patients are usually managed with medical therapy and regular monitoring. Lifestyle modifications, such as avoiding strenuous physical activities and certain medications, play a critical role. Additionally, psychological support is essential due to the anxiety and depression associated with LQTS. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) offers an alternative for those intolerant to beta-blockers or ICDs. For diagnosis and management, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) are proving beneficial, enhancing early detection and risk stratification. Despite these developments, significant gaps in understanding the pathophysiology and optimal management strategies for LQTS remain. Future research should focus on refining risk stratification, developing new therapeutic approaches, and generating robust data to guide treatment decisions, ultimately aiming for a personalized medicine approach.

Subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) is an alternative to a transvenous implantable cardio defibrillator (TV-ICD). An S-ICD reduces the risk of transvenous lead placement. However, further research is required to determine how S-ICDs affect patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). In this study, we investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of S-ICDs versus TV-ICDs in HCM. Methods: On December 6th, 2023, we performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing S-ICDs with TV-ICDs in HCM patients published from 2004 until 2023. No language restrictions were applied. The primary outcome was appropriate shocks (AS), with inappropriate shocks (IAS), and device-related complications considered as secondary outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random effects model. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the studies. Results: The search yielded 1,114 records. Seven studies comprising 4,347 HCM patients were included, of whom 3,325 (76.0%) had TV-ICDs, and 1,022 (22.6%) had S-ICDs. There were 2,564 males (58.9%). The age range was from 39.1 to 49.4 years. Compared with the TV-ICD group, the S-ICD cohort had a significantly lower incidence of device-related complications (OR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30-0.89; P=0.02; I2=4%). Contrastingly, there were no statistically significant differences in the occurrences of AS (OR 0.49; 95% CI: 0.22-1.08; P=0.08; I2=75%) and IAS (OR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.57-1.84; P=0.93; I2=65%) between the two device modalities. In the analysis of the overall risk of bias in the studies, we found 42% of them with several, 28% with moderate, and 14% with low risk of bias. Conclusions: In HCM patients, S-ICDs were associated with a lower incidence of device-associated problems than TV-ICDs. AS and IAS incidence rates were similar between groups. These findings may assist clinicians in determining the most suitable device for treating patients with HCM.

Peri-Operative Outcomes Associated With the Placement of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators in Patients With Sarcoidosis: A Nationwide Database Analysis.

Rationale Sarcoidosis with cardiac involvement can be associated with serious life-threatening arrhythmias and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) have been used for primary and secondary prevention of sudden death in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Post-ICD placement complications have been shown to be higher in patients with CS. However, data comparing postoperative ICD complications among sarcoidosis patients with the general population is limited. Here, we evaluated the association of postoperative complications with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in sarcoidosis.  Methods Using the NIS database, we identified cases of adults aged ≥ 18 years undergoing surgical placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators between 2010 and 2019. Using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, we identified patients with sarcoidosis. In all statistical analyses, we applied weights provided by HCUP to produce results representative of national estimates. We compared categorical and continuous covariates in the baseline characteristics using the chi-square test and analysis of variance, respectively. We employed multivariable logistic and linear regression to compare binomial and continuous outcomes to assess differences in mortality rates. Results We analyzed 114073 patients during the study period. Of these, 1012 (0.9%) had sarcoidosis and were found to be significantly younger and female compared to patients without sarcoidosis (56.4 ±11.5 years vs. 65.6 ± 13.9 years, p <0.001) and (39.4% vs. 28.3%, p<0.001) respectively. Further, patients with sarcoidosis were more likely to be African American (45% vs. 16.3%), have private insurance (45.4% vs. 23.8%), and less likely to have Medicare (34.9% vs. 60.9%). Overall, post-ICD placement complications such as lead complications (4.2% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.03), post-procedure hemorrhage (4.1% vs. 5.5%, p=0.048), and requirement for transfusion (2.3% vs. 4.4%) were less likely in patients with sarcoidosis. Regarding post-ICD placement inpatient mortality, sarcoidosis was not associated with any difference (OR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.18-2.88 p=0.634). Conclusions Placement of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with sarcoidosis is a safe procedure and is associated with significantly lower rates of lead complications, post-procedure hemorrhage, and requirement for transfusion. This is of great importance as it is known that patients with underlying sarcoidosis are predisposed to developing more cardiac complications.

Methylphenidate-Induced Non-ischemic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Mild Pulmonary Hypertension.

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is commonly diagnosed during childhood. Patients present with hyperactive-impulsive behavior and/or inappropriate inattention which may persist through adulthood. Central nervous system stimulants have been used to manage patients with ADHD. Methylphenidate which is used as a first-line therapy has been shown to have adverse cardiovascular effects in these patients. This is a case of a young male with a history of ADHD since childhood on methylphenidate who was diagnosed with acute non-ischemic heart failure with an ejection fraction of 15-20%. Methylphenidate-induced heart failure is the rare adverse effect seen in ADHD patients who are on this medication. Our patient was started on goal-directed medical therapy for heart failure and was discharged with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (LifeVest®, ZOLL, Pittsburgh, PA) because of his persistently low left ventricular ejection fraction. It is important for physicians to always consider heart failure as a possible cardiovascular adverse effect when starting patients on methylphenidate for the management of ADHD.

Postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia improves pain management after subcutaneous implantable defibrillator implantation.

Objective: Postoperative pain is a major issue with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD). In 2020, we introduced intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) in addition to the conventional, request-based analgesia for postoperative pain control in S-ICD. To determine the effect and safety, we quantitatively assessed the effect of IV-PCA after S-ICD surgery over conventional methods. Methods: During the study period, a total of 113 consecutive patients (age, 50.1 ± 15.5 years: males, 101) underwent a de novo S-ICD implantation under general anesthesia. While the postoperative pain was addressed with either request-based analgesia (by nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs, N = 68, dubbed as "PCA absent") or fentanyl-based IV-PCA in addition to the standard care (N = 45, dubbed as "PCA present"). The degree of postoperative pain from immediately after surgery to 1 week were retrospectively investigated by the numerical rating scale (NRS) divided into four groups at rest and during activity (0: no pain, 1-3: mild pain, 4-6: moderate pain, 7-10: severe pain). Results: Although IV-PCA was removed on Day 1, it was associated with continued better pain control compared to PCA absent group. At rest, the proportion of patients expressing pain (mild or more) was significantly lower in the PCA present group from Day 0 to Day 4. In contrast to at rest, a better pain control continued through the entire study period of 7 days. No serious adverse events were observed. A few patients experienced nausea in both groups and the inter-group difference was not found significant. Conclusion: IV-PCA suppresses postoperative pain in S-ICD without major safety concerns.

Hyperkalemia-Induced T Wave Oversensing in an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator.

A 66-year-old female with end-stage renal disease and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, status post implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) presented to the emergency department with dizziness and fatigue. An electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm, complete atrioventricular block, and ventricular paced rhythm at 30 beats per minute (bpm). Device interrogation revealed a programmed VVI mode with a lower rate limit of 40 bpm and evidence of T wave oversensing. Serologic studies were remarkable for hyperkalemia (7.9 mmol/dL). The device was initially reprogrammed to provide a higher pacing rate and symptomatic improvement. Both complete AV block and T wave oversensing resolved after correction of hyperkalemia. This case highlights the need for vigilant monitoring of electrolyte imbalances in ICD patients.

Understanding Phantom Shocks in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients.

Phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients create a complex nexus between cardiac treatment and psychological distress. These sensations, mimicking therapeutic shocks without device activation, deeply affect patients' functionality and well-being. Heightened anxiety, depression, and hopelessness predispose individuals to these occurrences, posing significant challenges. This article delves into the intricate nature of phantom shocks, highlighting subtle clinical cues to differentiate them from genuine therapy shocks. Through a case study of a 75-year-old male with recurrent ICD shocks, diagnosed eventually with phantom shocks, the interplay between psychological distress and physical sensations is underscored. Urgent intervention to address the patient's anxiety and depression using psychotherapy and antidepressants became imperative. The case underscores the immense psychological toll of phantom shocks, exacerbating fear, hopelessness, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Despite treatment attempts, their impact persisted, leading to a shift to comfort-focused care. While research identifies factors such as education levels and prior therapy, predicting and managing phantom shocks remains challenging. This article stresses the need for clinician vigilance, urging proactive identification and tailored interventions to mitigate the profound effects of phantom shocks. The current research landscape lacks comprehensive strategies, necessitating further exploration and targeted therapies to restore patient well-being. In conclusion, comprehensive understanding and specialized care for phantom shocks in ICD recipients, addressing both cardiac and psychological aspects, are imperative. Early recognition and tailored interventions offer promise in alleviating their adverse effects, reinstating patient control, and improving their quality of life.

Superior vena cava obstruction and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices-a new era of leadless devices.

Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators require the placement of a transvenous lead through the superior vena cava (SVC), which can be difficult if there is stenosis or obstruction of the SVC. Moreover, SVC syndrome may occur after the lead is inserted even if the SVC was intact before the implantation. Therefore, there is need of an appropriate strategy for handling stenosis or obstruction of SVC during lead placement. In addition, advances are being made in CIEDs that do not require transvenous leads, and thus CIEDs without a transvenous lead should be considered depending on the indications and urgency of the particular case. This manuscript is divided into (I) device therapy for patients with SVC obstruction and (II) therapeutic strategy for SVC obstruction after lead implantation. In patients with SVC syndrome, treatment of the SVC occlusion should be based on the individual pathophysiology, and depending on the indications and urgency of the case, treatment with CIEDs that do not require transvenous leads should be considered. Further data must be accumulated to clarify the long-term prognosis of device implantation after treatment of SVC occlusion. In addition, transvenous lead extraction is now widely used for device-related SVC obstruction, and this procedure also merits further accumulation of data.

Improved outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator in systolic heart failure: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database.

Background: Temporal change in outcomes of heart failure patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) is unknown. Methods: We assess outcomes and underlying heart diseases of patients receiving CRT-D with analyzing database of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry (JCDTR) at the implantation year 2011-2015 and New JCDTR at the implantation year 2018-2021. Results: Proportion of nonischemic heart diseases was about 70% in both the groups (JCDTR: 69%; New JCDTR: 72%). Cardiac sarcoidosis increased with the rate of 5% in the JCDTR to 9% in the New JCDTR group. During an average follow-up of 21 months, death from any cause occurred in 167 of 906 patients in the JCDTR group (18%) and 79 of 611 patients in the New JCDTR group (13%) (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] in the New JCDTR group, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.94; p = .017). The superiority was mainly driven by reduction in the risk of noncardiac death. With regard to appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, there was a significant reduction in the New JCDTR group versus the JCDTR group (aHR in the New JCDTR group, 0.76; 95% CI: 0.59-0.98; p = .032 for appropriate ICD therapy; aHR in the New JCDTR group, 0.24; 95% CI: 0.12-0.50; p < .0001 for inappropriate ICD therapy). Conclusions: All-cause mortality was reduced in CRT-D patients implanted during 2018-2021 compared to those during 2011-2015, with a significant reduction in noncardiac death.

Real-world data of patients affected by advanced heart failure treated with implantable cardioverter defibrillator and left ventricular assist device: Results of a multicenter observational study.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (L-VAD) implantation is increasingly used in patients with heart failure (HF) and most patients also have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Limited data are available on the incidence of ICD therapies and complications in this special setting. The aim of this study was to analyze the real-world incidence and predictors of ICD therapies, complications and interactions between ICD and L-VAD. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study in patients with advanced HF implanted with ICD and a continuous-flow L-VAD, followed-up in five advanced HF centers in Northern Italy. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients (89.7% male, median age 59, 48.3% with ischemic etiology) were enrolled. After a median follow-up of 21 months, 66 patients (28.2%) experienced an appropriate ICD therapy, 22 patients (9.4%) an inappropriate ICD therapy, and 17 patients (7.3%) suffered from an interaction between ICD and L-VAD. The composite outcome of all ICD-related complications was reported in 41 patients (17.5%), and 121 (51.7%) experienced an L-VAD-related complication. At multivariable analysis, an active ventricular tachycardia (VT) zone and a prior ICD generator replacement were independent predictors of ICD therapies and of total ICD-related complications, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world patients with both L-VAD and ICD experience a high rate of ICD therapies and complications. Our findings suggest the importance of tailoring device programming in order to minimize the incidence of unnecessary ICD therapies, thus sparing the need for ICD generator replacement, a procedure associated to a high risk of complications.

Perioperative Management of a Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Transplant in a Recipient With a Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava.

A 60-year-old male with end-stage heart failure due to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and mitral regurgitation presented for a donation after circulatory death (DCD) orthotopic heart transplantation. Intraoperatively, a persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC), absent innominate vein, and small right superior vena cava were discovered. A bicaval technique was performed, using an interconnecting prosthetic conduit to anastomose the PLSVC with the right atrial appendage and an interposition graft to the native R SVC. After surgery, a transthoracic echocardiogram showed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 60-65% and improved systolic function. The postoperative course was uneventful, with discharge home after 16 days.

Impact of Radiotherapy on Malfunctions and Battery Life of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: This study analyses a large number of cancer patients with CIEDs for device malfunction and premature battery depletion by device interrogation after each radiotherapy fraction and compares different guidelines in regard to patient safety. METHODS: From 2007 to 2022, a cohort of 255 patients was analyzed for CIED malfunctions via immediate device interrogation after every RT fraction. RESULTS: Out of 324 series of radiotherapy treatments, with a total number of 5742 CIED interrogations, nine device malfunctions (2.8%) occurred. Switching into back-up/safety mode and software errors occurred four times each. Once, automatic read-out could not be performed. The median prescribed cumulative dose at planning target volume (PTV) associated with CIED malfunction was 45.0 Gy (IQR 36.0-64.0 Gy), with a median dose per fraction of 2.31 Gy (IQR 2.0-3.0 Gy). The median maximum dose at the CIED at time of malfunction was 0.3 Gy (IQR 0.0-1.3 Gy). No correlation between CIED malfunction and maximum photon energy (p = 0.07), maximum dose at the CIED (p = 0.59) nor treatment localization (p = 0.41) could be detected. After excluding the nine malfunctions, premature battery depletion was only observed three times (1.2%). Depending on the national guidelines, 1-9 CIED malfunctions in this study would have been detected on the day of occurrence and in none of the cases would patient safety have been compromised. CONCLUSION: Radiation-induced malfunctions of CIEDs and premature battery depletion are rare. If recommendations of national safety guidelines are followed, only a portion of the malfunctions would be detected directly after occurrence. Nevertheless, patient safety would not be compromised.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator in non-ischemic and ischemic patients for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death: Analysis of the Japan cardiac device treatment registry database.

Background: Panoramic studies in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) focusing on the etiology and indication are scarce. Besides, a controversy exists regarding requirement of a defibrillator in non-ischemic patients for primary prevention with CRT. Methods: Annual trends of de novo CRT-D implantations from 2011 to 2020 and outcomes of those between January 2011 and August 2015 were analyzed from the Japan cardiac device treatment registry (JCDTR) and New JCDTR database. Results: From 2011 to 2020, 8062 CRT-D recipients were registered, whose dominant indication was primary prevention of sudden cardiac death with a steady rate of about 70%. There was no significant temporal change of the proportion of non-ischemic patients being about 70% and 65% for primary and secondary prevention, respectively. Non-ischemic patients for primary prevention were associated with increased odds of appropriate ICD therapy [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-2.75; p = .047] and reduced odds of any death (aHR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.44-0.99; p = .046) as compared to ischemic patients. Conclusions: Proportion of non-ischemic etiology was much higher than that of ischemic one in the CRT-D cohort. Based on the higher odds of appropriate ICD therapy, non-ischemic patients for primary prevention appear to be prudently selected in Japan.

Management of Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice and Challenging Scenarios.

It is well established that direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the cornerstone of anticoagulant strategy in atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) and should be preferred over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) since they are superior or non-inferior to VKAs in reducing thromboembolic risk and are associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (IH). In addition, many factors, such as fewer pharmacokinetic interactions and less need for monitoring, contribute to the favor of this therapeutic strategy. Although DOACs represent a more suitable option, several issues should be considered in clinical practice, including drug-drug interactions (DDIs), switching to other antithrombotic therapies, preprocedural and postprocedural periods, and the use in patients with chronic renal and liver failure and in those with cancer. Furthermore, adherence to DOACs appears to remain suboptimal. This narrative review aims to provide a practical guide for DOAC prescription and address challenging scenarios.

A Case of Young Brugada Syndrome Patient With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Complication Requiring Device Extraction and Reimplantation.

Brugada syndrome is an arrhythmogenic condition characterized by ST-segment elevation and J-point elevation in at least two precordial leads. Most ST segment elevations are associated with myocardial infarction, although other conditions such as pericarditis, channelopathies, and a few genetic conditions should be considered. Brugada syndrome is an inherited cardiac condition associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The most common presentation is palpitations or syncopal events in patients presenting to the emergency department. We present the case of a young 26-year-old patient who was diagnosed with Brugada syndrome at the age of 11 following a syncopal event at school and had a transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implanted. He was found to have a high lead impedance following a collapse at his routine outpatient device clinic appointment and was transferred to our hospital. He underwent successful transvenous ICD and lead extraction and had a subcutaneous ICD implanted.