Exploring the Relationships Between Clinical Examination Findings, Subjective Reported Symptoms and Objective Nasal Patency Measures in Nasal Obstruction: A Baseline NAIROS Sub-Study Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The role of objective nasal airflow measures using peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) and rhinospirometry in supporting clinical examination findings when offering patients septoplasty remain undefined. OBJECTIVE: To explore the baseline relationships between clinical examination findings, subjective reported symptoms and objective nasal patency measures in nasal obstruction. METHODS: This is a sub-study of the NAIROS trial. Participants with nasal obstruction secondary to septal deviation were included in this NAIROS sub-study. The side of septal deviation, enlargement of inferior turbinate (IT), the need for IT reduction if septoplasty was being performed, the area of septum deflecting into the airway and observer rated airway block (ORAB-arbitrarily divided by <50% and >50% blockage) were assessed by clinicians. The subjective score of nasal obstruction was assessed using the Double Ordinal Assessed Subjective Scale (DOASS). Objective nasal patency measures (e.g., nasal partitioning ratio, [NPR] and PNIF) were measured using PNIF and rhinospirometry. RESULTS: The mean NPR for left-sided, both-sided and right-sided septal deviation was -0.35, -0.02 and 0.51, respectively (p < 0.001). There was very weak correlation between the requirement for IT reduction and PNIF change (0.13, p < 0.01). There was no difference in mean PNIF (94 L/min vs. 93 L/min) and mean DOASS (0.33 vs. 0.38) for participants with ORAB rated <50% and >50%. The mean NPR for participants with ORAB >50% was higher than for those with ORAB <50% (0.51 vs. 0.41, p = 0.002). There was strong correlation between the DOASS and NPR (+0.737, p < 0.001). The mean DOASS score for right-sided, both-sided and left-sided septal deviation was 0.32, 0.05 and -0.29, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study identified strong relationships between the clinician rated side of septal deflection, the patient reported DOASS and the objective NPR measurements. NPR and the clinician rated degree of airway blockage were concordant.

Single-Sided Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow as an Adjunct Objective Measure in Functional Septorhinoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Nasal obstruction can negatively impact patient quality of life, which can be alleviated by functional nasal surgery. Quantification of improvement is most commonly evaluated with the use of validated survey instruments but lacks widely utilized objective measures. Herein, we evaluate the utility of single-sided peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) as an objective outcome measure in the evaluation and management of nasal obstruction. METHODS: Adults presenting with nasal obstruction who were recommended septorhinoplasty were included in the study. Single-sided and bilateral PNIF measures, nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scores, surgeon-rated percent nasal obstruction, and nasal obstruction visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded preoperatively with Spearman's correlation coefficients (ρ) calculated. Correlation coefficients were also calculated between the change in the above variables from the pre- to postoperative state. RESULTS: One Hundred Fifteen patients were enrolled in the study and underwent septorhinoplasty. Significant correlations between single-sided PNIF and the associated VAS scores of the same laterality were found for the worse (ρ = -0.366; p < 0.001) and better (ρ = -0.313; p < 0.001) breathing sides. Correlations between postoperative improvement in single-sided PNIF and improvement in VAS scores were also found (ρ = -0.330; p = 0.007, ρ = -0.354; p = 0.004). No correlation between NOSE scores and single-sided PNIF was found except in the subgroup of patients presenting with bilateral asymmetric nasal obstruction, in who NOSE scores correlated with worse side PNIF (ρ = -0.369; p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Single-sided PNIF has a better correlation to patients' symptoms as rated by VAS score than bilateral PNIF and may be a useful adjunct objective measure in the evaluation and quantification of improvement in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Laryngoscope, 2024.

Comparisons between In-Check DIAL® and PF810® in evaluation and training inspiratory capacity for using dry powder inhalers.

BACKGROUND: Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) rely on both internal resistance and patients' inspiratory capacity for effective operation. Optimal inspiratory technique is crucial for DPI users. This study assessed the accuracy and repeatability of two available devices, PF810® and In-Check DIAL®, and analyzed their measurement errors and consistency in detecting inspiratory capacity. METHODS: The accuracy and repeatability of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and forced inspiratory vital capacity (FIVC) against various internal resistances of the two devices were assessed using standard waveforms generated by a breathing simulator. The agreement of PIF measurements between the two devices in healthy volunteers and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients was analyzed with the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman graphical analysis. RESULTS: PF810® showed great accuracy and repeatability in measuring PIF, except for square waveforms at the lowest flow rate (20 L/min). In-Check DIAL® exhibited poor accuracy against high resistance levels. In scenarios with no resistance, In-Check DIAL® had significantly smaller measurement errors than PF810®, but larger errors against high resistance levels. The two devices showed excellent agreement (ICC > 0.80, P < 0.05), except for healthy volunteers against medium to high resistance (R3-R5) where the ICC was insignificant. Bland-Altman plots indicated small disagreements between the two devices for both healthy volunteers and COPD patients. CONCLUSIONS: In-Check DIAL® exhibited poor accuracy and larger measurement errors than PF810® when detecting PIFs against higher internal resistances. However, its good performance against lower internal resistances, along with its cost-effectiveness and convenience made it appropriate for primary care. PF810® showed good accuracy and repeatability and could detect additional parameters of inspiratory capacity beyond PIF, though required further studies to confirm its clinical benefits.

[Peak nasal inspiratory flow in the assessment of nasal airway obstruction]. / Metod registratsii pikovogo nosovogo inspiratornogo potoka v otsenke narushenii nosovogo dykhaniya (obzor literatury).

RELEVANCE: Nasal congestion is one of the most common complaints in otolaryngology practice and can significantly impact the quality of life for patients. Objective and subjective assessments provide different information, but objective assessment of nasal obstruction is crucial for accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment. This review demonstrates that peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) is a reproducible and reliable measure of objective nasal patency. It is inexpensive, easy to use, suitable for serial measurements, and can be applied to patients of different age groups. PNIF is recommended for use in every outpatient clinic that treats patients with nasal congestion. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the data on the application of PNIF in diagnosing conditions of the nasal airways. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Publications (articles and relevant abstracts) available in the PubMed and eLibrary databases were analyzed. CONCLUSION: PNIF offers an objective and non-invasive assessment of nasal airflow, aiding in diagnosis, therapy monitoring, and preoperative planning. Further research, standardization, and establishment of normative data will enhance the informative value of peak nasal inspiratory flow in assessing nasal obstruction.

Acute Effects of Exercise at Different Temperatures on Clinical Symptoms and Nasal Blood Flow in Patient with Allergic Rhinitis: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects the nose and is triggered by allergens. However, no research studies have analyzed the acute effect of aerobic exercise at different temperatures in AR patients. This study was to determine the acute effect of aerobic exercise at different temperatures on rhinitis symptoms and nasal blood flow (NBF) in AR patients. Fifteen AR patients aged 18-24 years were randomized in a crossover fashion into two protocols: 60 minutes of aerobic exercise at temperatures of 25 °C and 34 °C. The NBF, rhinitis symptoms, peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) variables were measured. During exercise at 25°C, a notable reduction was observed in NBF, nasal congestion, and sneezing in comparison to exercising at 34°C (p < 0.05). The SpO2 demonstrated significant decreases at 34°C compared to exercise at 25°C after 30 minutes post exercise. The rhinitis symptom scores and NBF in both exercise at 25°C and 34°C significantly decreased and PNIF increased during and after exercise compared to before exercise (p < 0.05). In conclusion, both exercising at 25°C and 34°C can contribute to the alleviation of allergic rhinitis symptoms by decreasing rhinitis symptom and NBF. However, exercising in a room at 25°C exhibits a more significant reduction in nasal blood flow, nasal congestion, and sneezing compared to the 34°C setting.

Prevalence of Critical Errors and Insufficient Peak Inspiratory Flow in Patients Hospitalized with COPD in a Department of General Internal Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: The suboptimal use of inhalers in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is probably a major but poorly documented problem in hospitalized patients. We aimed to describe the prevalence of misused inhalers among patients hospitalized with COPD in a department of general internal medicine. Methods: We conducted a monocentric cross-sectional study in consecutive patients with a diagnosis of COPD and hospitalized between August 2022 and April 2023 in the internal medicine division of Fribourg Hospital, Switzerland. Patients underwent an assessment of their inhaler technique and peak inspiratory flow (PIF) using the In-Check Dial G16®. The primary outcome was the prevalence of misused inhalers, defined as an inhaler used with a critical error and/or insufficient PIF. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of inhalers unsuitable to patients' characteristics and of patients using at least one misused inhaler. Results: The study included 96 patients and 160 inhalers were assessed at admission. Among these inhalers, 111 (69.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 61.6-76.4) were misused; 105 (65.6%; 95% CI 57.7-72.9) due to the presence of a critical error in the inhalation technique and 22 (13.8%; 95% CI 8.8-20.1) due to insufficient PIF. Concerning the secondary outcome, 27 inhalers (16.9%) were unsuitable, and 79 patients (82.3%) used at least one misused inhaler. Conclusion: Among patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of COPD, two-thirds of inhalers were misused. Suboptimal use was mainly due to the presence of critical errors, but also to the presence of an insufficient PIF and unsuitable inhalers.

Changes in Peak Inspiratory Flow After Acute Bronchodilation: An Observational Study of Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Introduction: Identifying factors influencing peak inspiratory flow (PIF) is essential for aerosol drug delivery in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. While a minimum PIF for dry powder inhalers (DPIs) is established, acute bronchodilator (BD) effects on PIF remain unknown. Materials and Methods: An inspiratory flow meter (In-Check™ DIAL) was used to measure PIF in stable patients during a 24-week observational cross-sectional study. Additionally, bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) was determined using the In-Check DIAL device and spirometry. Patients received four puffs of albuterol, and pre- and post-BD PIF, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity were measured. Sixty-three patients completed acute BDR data collection from July 31, 2019, to November 9, 2021. Primary endpoints were pre- and post-BD spirometry and PIF. Statistical analyses included PIF correlations with FEV1. BD change was assessed according to inhaler resistance and sex (subgroup analysis). Results: Median patient age was 64.8 years, 85.7% were non-Hispanic White, and 57.1% were female. The median increase in absolute PIF (In-Check DIAL) was 5.0 L/min, and the % PIF change was 8.9%. With albuterol, 57.1% experienced a PIF BD change >5.0%, whereas 49.2% experienced a change >10.0%. Similarly, 55.6% experienced an FEV1 BD change >5.0% and 28.6% had a >10.0% FEV1 BD change with albuterol. PIF was weakly correlated with FEV1 BD change (absolute; % PIF; r = 0.28 [p = 0.02]; r = 0.21 [p = 0.11]). Pre- and post-BD median PIF were 75.5 and 83.5 L/min for low-to-medium-resistance DPI and 45.0 and 52.0 L/min for high-resistance, respectively. The median increases in pre- and post-BD PIF were 9.0 L/min in males and 4.5 L/min in females. In contrast to when using the In-Check DIAL device, we observed no consistent bronchodilatory effects on PIF measured by spirometry. Conclusions: Using the In-Check DIAL device, ∼50% of patients experienced >10% PIF increase after acute BD, potentially enhancing medication lung deposition. Further research is required to understand PIF's impact on medication delivery. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04168775.

Prevalence and Factors Affecting the Optimal and Non-optimal Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in Stable and Exacerbation Phases of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Bronchial Asthma in India.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bronchial asthma pose significant threats and challenges to global health care, emphasizing the need for precise inhaler therapies to overcome this burden. The optimal peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) is a crucial determinant for the right selection and effective use of an inhaler device. It also helps to improve the treatment effectiveness of obstructive airway diseases worldwide as it allows effective drug delivery to distal airways and lung parenchyma. It is used as a selection criterion by physicians around the world for selecting personalized inhaler devices. OBJECTIVE: To find out the optimal and non-optimal PIFR prevalence and its influencing factors in stable and exacerbation phases of COPD and bronchial asthma in Tamil Nadu, India. METHODOLOGY: It is a single-center, observational, cross-sectional study conducted from February 2022 to August 2023. The patients who meet the diagnostic criteria specified by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines for COPD and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines for bronchial asthma are enrolled in our study. The PIFR was measured using a hand-held digital spirometry device, along with demographic data collection. Statistical analyses, including t-tests and chi-square tests, were performed using SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). RESULTS: Gender, height, and disease severity significantly impacted the PIFR. Females, normal BMI individuals, and those with moderate disease severity exhibited higher optimal PIFR rates. Stable or exacerbation phases, disease, and smoking status do not influence either optimal or non-optimal PIFR. Notably, substantial differences in lung function parameters were observed between optimal (60-90 L/min) and non-optimal PIFR (insufficient: <30 L/min, suboptimal: 30-60 L/min, excessive: >90 L/min) groups, highlighting their impact on respiratory health. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the importance of personalized inhaler strategies, considering gender, height, and disease severity. Proper inhaler device selection, continuous monitoring of inhaler technique, and tailored inhaler education at every OPD visit are vital for optimizing effective COPD and bronchial asthma management and improving adherence to treatment.

The Effects of Inspiratory Flows, Inspiratory Pause, and Suction Catheter on Aerosol Drug Delivery with Vibrating Mesh Nebulizers During Mechanical Ventilation.

Background: Some experts recommend specific ventilator settings during nebulization for mechanically ventilated patients, such as inspiratory pause, high inspiratory to expiratory ratio, and so on. However, it is unclear whether those settings improve aerosol delivery. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the impact of ventilator settings on aerosol delivery during mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: Salbutamol (5.0 mg/2.5 mL) was nebulized by a vibrating mesh nebulizer (VMN) in an adult MV model. VMN was placed at the inlet of humidifier and 15 cm away from the Y-piece of the inspiratory limb. Eight scenarios with different ventilator settings were compared with endotracheal tube (ETT) connecting 15 cm from the Y-piece, including tidal volumes of 6-8 mL/kg, respiratory rates of 12-20 breaths/min, inspiratory time of 1.0-2.5 seconds, inspiratory pause of 0-0.3 seconds, and bias flow of 3.5 L/min. In-line suction catheter was utilized in two scenarios. Delivered drug distal to the ETT was collected by a filter, and drug was assayed by an ultraviolet spectrophotometry (276 nm). Results: Compared to the use of inspiratory pause, the inhaled dose without inspiratory pause was either higher or similar across all ventilation settings. Inhaled dose was negatively correlated with inspiratory flow with VMN placed at 15 cm away from the Y-piece (rs = -0.68, p < 0.001) and at the inlet of humidifier (rs = -0.83, p < 0.001). The utilization of in-line suction catheter reduced inhaled dose, regardless of the ventilator settings and nebulizer placements. Conclusions: When VMN was placed at the inlet of humidifier, directly connecting the Y-piece to ETT without a suction catheter improved aerosol delivery. In this configuration, the inhaled dose increased as the inspiratory flow decreased, inspiratory pause had either no or a negative impact on aerosol delivery. The inhaled dose was greater with VMN placed at the inlet of humidifier than 15 cm away the Y-piece.

Inappropriate Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in the Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Korea.

Background: Inhalation therapy efficacy hinges on proper peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) attainment, yet the prevalence of inappropriate PIFR among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains unstudied in Korea. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of inappropriate PIFR, its correlation with COPD assessment test (CAT) scores, and factors associated with suboptimal PIFR. Methods: We enrolled 108 patients with COPD who had been using the same inhaler for at least one year without exacerbations. PIFR was measured using an inspiratory flow meter (In-Check™ DIAL G16). Demographic, clinical, pulmonary function, and CAT score data were collected. Inappropriate was defined as PIFR < 60L/min for dry power inhaler (DPI) users or > 90L/min for aerosol device users. Results: The cohort comprised 87 (80.6%) men, mean age 71.0 ± 8.5 years, with mean post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second of 69.1 ± 1.8% predicted. Twenty-nine (26.9%) used aerosol devices, 76 (70.4%) used DPIs, and three (2.8%) used both. Inappropriate PIFRs were found in 17.2% of aerosol device users and 42.1% of DPI users. CAT scores were significantly higher in inappropriate PIFR group than appropriate PIFR group (11.2 ± 7.7 vs 7.5 ± 4.9, P = 0.003). In DPI users, female, shorter height, lower body weight and MVV (maximal voluntary ventilation) were associated with inappropriate PIFR. Conclusions: Prevalence of inappropriate PIFR among patients with COPD is 17.2% for aerosol device users and 42.1% for DPI users. Suboptimal PIFR correlates with female gender, shorter stature, lower weight and MVV in DPI users.

Exploring Indicators for Training Load Control in Young Swimmers: The Role of Inspiratory Spirometry Outcomes.

One of the most important implications of technology in swimming is to control training loads. Lactate control, video-analysis of the technique or the assessment of specific actions, i.e., the vertical jump, have helped to provide load adaptation indicators in swimmers in recent decades. However, these indicators have led to a longer application time, due to their indirect procedure and the need to analyze each variable. The aim of this study was to analyze whether inspiratory spirometry values can serve as a training load control tool in swimmers. Countermovement jump (CMJ), Inspiratory Force Index (S-INDEX) and Peak Inspiratory Flow (PIF) were evaluated with a load of 3 cm H2O before, during and after performing a swimming performance test (critical speed test: specific warming up, 400 m and 100 m freestyle). Positive correlations were found between S-INDEX and jump height after warm-up, after 400 m and at the end of 100 m (Spearman = 0.470, R2 = 0.280; Spearman = 0.508, R2 = 0.392; Spearman = 0.458, R2 = 0.359, p < 0.05, respectively). Moreover, positive correlations were also found between PIF and jump height at the same evaluated moments (Spearman = 0.461, R2 = 0.305; Spearman = 0.493, R2 = 0.386; Spearman = 0.454, R2 = 0.374, p < 0.05). Both the S-INDEX and the PIF could serve as useful tools for swimmer load control, allowing coaches to make more immediate decisions.

Analyzing key elements of breathing patterns, deriving remaining variables, and identifying cutoff values in individuals with chronic respiratory disease and healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary physiology encompasses intricate breathing patterns (BPs), characterized by breathing frequency (Bf), volumes, and flows. The complexities intensify in the presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), especially during exercise. This study seeks to identify pivotal factors driving changes among these variables and establish cutoff values, comparing their efficacy in differentiating BPs to traditional methods, specifically a breathing reserve (BR) of 30% and a Bf of 50 bpm. METHODS: Screening 267 subjects revealed 23 with ILD, 126 with COPD, 33 healthy individuals, and the exclusion of 85 subjects. Lung function tests and ramp-pattern cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) were conducted, identifying crucial BP elements. Changes were compared between groups at peak exercise. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis determined cutoff values. RESULTS: Inspiratory time (TI) remained constant at peak exercise for all subjects (two-group comparisons, all p=NS). Given known differences in expiratory time (TE) and tidal volume (VT) among ILD, COPD, and healthy states, constant TI could infer patterns for Bf, total breathing cycle time (TTOT=60/Bf), I:E ratio, inspiratory duty cycle (IDC, TI/TTOT), rapid shallow breathing index (Bf/VT), tidal inspiratory and expiratory flows (VT/TI and VT/TE), and minute ventilation (V̇E=Bf×VT) across conditions. These inferences aligned with measurements, with potential type II errors causing inconsistencies. RSBI of 23 bpm/L and VT/TI of 104 L/min may differentiate ILD from control, while V̇E of 54 L/min, BR of 30%, and VT/TE of 108 may differentiate COPD from control. BR of 21%, TE of 0.99 s, and IDC of .45 may differentiate ILD from COPD. The algorithm outperformed traditional methods (AUC 0.84-0.91 versus 0.59-0.90). CONCLUSION: The quasi-fixed TI, in conjunction with TE and VT, proves effective in inferring time-related variables of BPs. The findings have the potential to significantly enhance medical education in interpreting cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Moreover, the study introduces a novel algorithm for distinguishing BPs among individuals with ILD, COPD, and those who are healthy.

Effects of pressure-controlled ventilation targeting end-inspiratory flow rate on pulmonary complications and inflammation levels in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the impact of pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) focusing on end-inspiratory flow rate on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and inflammation levels in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position. METHODS: A total of 187 patients who underwent posterior spinal surgery were enrolled and randomly divided into 3 groups: 61 in the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) group (group V), 62 in the PCV-volume-guaranteed (VG) group (group P1), and 64 in the PCV-VG end-expiratory zero flow rate group (group P2). Indicators including tidal volume (VT), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), and dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn) were recorded. The Ppeak, Cdyn, PETCO2, and oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) after intubation (T0), after prone position (T1), 60 min after prone position (T2), and after supine position at the end of surgery (T3) of the three groups were collected. RESULTS: In the within-group comparison, compared with T0, Ppeak increased at T1 - 2 in groups V and P1 (P < 0.01), whereas it decreased at T1 - 3 in group P2 (P < 0.01). Cdyn decreased at T1 - 2 and PaO2/FiO2 increased at T1 - 3 in all three groups (P < 0.01), and PaO2/FiO2 increased at T1 - 3 (P < 0.01). Compared with group V, Ppeak decreased at T0 - 3 in group P1 (P < 0.01) and at T1 - 3 in group P2 (P < 0.01), while Cdyn increased at T0 - 3 in groups P1 and P2 (P < 0.01). Compared with group P1, Ppeak was elevated at T0 (P < 0.01) and decreased at T1 - 3 (P < 0.05), and Cdyn was elevated at T0 - 3 in group P2 (P < 0.01). The total incidence of PPCs in group P2 was lower than that in group V (P < 0.01). Compared with the preoperative period, serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were increased at 24 and 72 h after surgery in group V (P < 0.01), whereas that was increased at 24 h after surgery in group P1 and group P2 (P < 0.01). Compared with group V, serum IL-6 and CRP levels were reduced at 24 h after surgery in groups P1 and P2 (P < 0.01 or < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position, PCV-VG targeting an end-inspiratory zero flow rate lowers the incidence of PPCs and inflammation levels.

Effect on Physical Position of Peak Inspiratory Flow in Stable COPD: An Observational Study.

Background: We examined the effect of physical position on peak inspiratory flow (PIF) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using dry-powder inhalers (DPIs) with low­medium internal resistance (R2) and/or high internal resistance (R5). Methods: This prospective study in stable, ambulatory patients with spirometry-confirmed COPD evaluated the effect of 3 physical positions on maximal PIF achieved. Participants had PIFs of 30-90L/min (R5) or 60-90L/min (R2 DPIs) using the In-Check™ DIAL. PIF was measured in triplicate randomly in 3 positions that patients might be in while using their inhaler (standing, sitting, and semi-upright [supine position with the head of the bed at 45°, neck flexed forward]) against prescribed DPI resistance (R2/R5/both). Correlations between PIF and percentage decline in PIF between positions and differences in participant characteristics with >10% versus ≤10% PIF decline standing to semi-upright were calculated. Results: A total of 76 participants (mean age, 65.2 years) had positional measurements; 59% reported seated DPI use at home. The mean (standard deviation) PIF standing, sitting, and semi-upright was 80.7 (13.4), 77.8 (14.3), and 74.0 (14.5) L/min, respectively, for R2 and 51.1 (9.52), 48.6 (9.84), and 45.8 (7.69) L/min, respectively, for R5 DPIs. PIF semi-upright was significantly lower than sitting and standing (R2; P < 0.0001) and standing (R5; P= 0.002). Approximately half of the participants had >10% decline in PIF from standing to semi-upright. Patient characteristics exceeding the 0.10 absolute standardized difference threshold with the decline in PIF for both the R2 and R5 DPIs were waist-to-hip ratio, modified Medical Research Council dyspnea score, and postbronchodilator percentage predicted forced vital capacity and PIF by spirometry. Conclusions: PIF was significantly affected by physical position regardless of DPI resistance. PIF was highest when standing and lowest when semi-upright. We recommend that patients with COPD stand while using an R2 or R5 DPI. Where unfeasible, the position should be sitting rather than semi-upright. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04168775.

Consideration and Assessment of Patient Factors When Selecting an Inhaled Delivery System in COPD.

Because guidelines and strategies for pharmacologic treatment of COPD focus on specific classes of inhaled medications, there is an unmet need for information to guide health care professionals for selecting an inhaled medication delivery system that matches the unique characteristics of individual patients. This article provides guidance for selecting an inhaled medication delivery system based on three "key" patient factors: cognitive function, manual dexterity/strength, and peak inspiratory flow. In addition, information is provided about specific tests to assess these patient factors. Cognitive impairment with an estimated prevalence of 25% among patients with COPD adversely affects patients' ability to correctly use a handheld device. To our knowledge, the prevalence of impaired manual dexterity/strength has not been reported in those with COPD. However, 79% of patients with COPD have reported one or more physical impediments that could influence their ability to manipulate an inhaler device. The measurement of peak inspiratory flow against the simulated resistance (PIFr) of a dry powder inhaler establishes whether the patient has the inhalation ability for creating optimal turbulent energy within the device. A suboptimal PIFr for low to medium-high resistance dry powder inhalers has been reported in 19% to 84% of stable outpatients with COPD. Health care professionals should consider cognitive function, manual dexterity/strength, and PIFr in their patients with COPD when prescribing inhaled pharmacotherapy. Impairments in these patient factors are common among those with COPD and can affect the individual's competency and effectiveness of using inhaled medications delivered by handheld devices.

Exploration of quality criteria for the detection of peak inspiratory flow under different resistance conditions.

BACKGROUND: At present, robust quality criteria and methods for the assessment of Peak inspiratory flow meter performance are lacking. OBJECTIVE: A standard flow-volume simulator for quality control analyses of an inhalation assessment device was utilized with different simulated resistance levels in order to propose a quality testing method and associated standard for this device type. METHODS: A standard flow-volume simulator was utilized to assess the performance of an In-Check DIAL® (Device I) and an intelligent inhalation assessment device (Device P) at a fixed volume and flow rate. Indices used to evaluate these two instruments included repeatability, accuracy, linearity, and impedance. RESULTS: Both devices exhibited good repeatability (<± 3 L/min). The difference between test results and standard simulator values for Device P was less than ± 5 L/min at resistance level R1 but higher than ± 5 L/min at resistance levels R2-5, while Device I were greater than 5 L/min at all resistance levels. The relative error for Device P was <± 10% at resistance levels R1, R2, and R4, but > 10% at resistance levels R3 and R5. The relative error values for Device I at all five resistance levels were > 10%. Device P passed the linearity test at the R2 resistance level, while Device I partially passed the linearity test at all five resistance levels. CONCLUSION: Standard monitoring methods and standards provide a valuable approach to the more reliable clinical assessment and application of these instruments.

Leptin signaling in the dorsomedial hypothalamus couples breathing and metabolism in obesity.

Mismatch between CO2 production (Vco2) and respiration underlies the pathogenesis of obesity hypoventilation. Leptin-mediated CNS pathways stimulate both metabolism and breathing, but interactions between these functions remain elusive. We hypothesized that LEPRb+ neurons of the dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMH) regulate metabolism and breathing in obesity. In diet-induced obese LeprbCre mice, chemogenetic activation of LEPRb+ DMH neurons increases minute ventilation (Ve) during sleep, the hypercapnic ventilatory response, Vco2, and Ve/Vco2, indicating that breathing is stimulated out of proportion to metabolism. The effects of chemogenetic activation are abolished by a serotonin blocker. Optogenetic stimulation of the LEPRb+ DMH neurons evokes excitatory postsynaptic currents in downstream serotonergic neurons of the dorsal raphe (DR). Administration of retrograde AAV harboring Cre-dependent caspase to the DR deletes LEPRb+ DMH neurons and abolishes metabolic and respiratory responses to leptin. These findings indicate that LEPRb+ DMH neurons match breathing to metabolism through serotonergic pathways to prevent obesity-induced hypoventilation.

Effect of Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Functional and Symptomatic Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Cross Sectional Study.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common condition causing significant symptoms to those affected, cause burden to the healthcare consumption and productivity loss (Fokkens et al. in Rhinol J 58:82-111, 2020). Chronic Rhinosinusitis is diagnosed clinically on the basis of characteristic symptoms with inflammation of the mucosa of the nose and paranasal sinuses of at least 12 consecutive weeks duration (Fokkens et al. in A summary for otorhinolaryngologists Rhinology 50:1-12, 2012). Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery is a minimally invasive procedure recommended for chronic Rhinosinusitis. Patients are not routinely assessed specifically for functional and symptomatic improvement after surgery. Previous studies assessed either subjective or objective outcome of surgery (Elwany et al. in Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 255:511-514, 1998; Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22): A predictor of post-surgical improvement in patients with chronic sinusitis - PMC, 2022. The present study assessed pre and post operative comparison of nasal mucociliary clearance, nasal patency and Sino-nasal outcome score and evaluated both subjective and objective outcomes of functional endoscopic sinus surgery simultaneously. To assess the effect of functional and symptomatic outcomes after Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis visiting a tertiary care centre in South India. The present study was a hospital based cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, in a tertiary care centre in South India, between February 2021 and May 2022. After obtaining informed consent all the patients fulfilling inclusion and exclusion criteria in the given time period were selected as the study population via consecutive sampling method. Detailed history, clinical examination and Diagnostic nasal endoscopy, Computed Tomography (CT) paranasal sinuses were done in all cases. Pre operative Saccharine transit time (STT), Peak nasal inspiratory flow rate (PNIFR) and Sino nasal outcome test (SNOT) 22 score were measured. All cases underwent Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS). Patients were followed up at 1st, 3rd and 6th month for functional and symptomatic outcomes. Data were analysed statistically using Friedman's ANOVA test. A total of 40 patients between the age of 20 and 60 with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with /without nasal polyposis were analysed. Incidence was found to be more common in middle aged group (37.5%). Among the study group 52.5% were females and 47.5% were males 55% was diagnosed as Chronic Rhinosinusitis with nasal polyp (CRSwNP) type and 45% as without nasal polyp (CRSsNP) type. On comparing the variation of Saccharine transit time, Peak nasal inspiratory flow rate and SNOT 22 score with post operative results done at, 1st, 3rd and 6th months using Friedman's ANOVA test showed statistically significant results (P value < 0.05). According to our study there is significant improvement in functional and symptomatic outcomes after Functional Endoscopic sinus surgery and restoration of mucociliary function in Chronic Rhinosinusitis patients. Thus, FESS is an excellent choice for treatment of CRS.

Effect of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Severity on Inspiratory Flow Rates via Inhaler Devices.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic respiratory disorder that affects millions of people worldwide and inhalation therapy is central to the symptomatic management of the disease. Therefore, knowledge of the minimum Peak inspiratory flow (PIF) requirements for specific inhalers especially dry powder inhalers (DPI's) is necessary when prescribing inhalation therapy. The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of COPD severity on PIF in patients with COPD. METHODOLOGY: A total of 150 subjects (75 patients with stable COPD, and 75 apparently healthy subjects) participated in the study. PIF was assessed using the In-check Inhaler Assessment Kit (manufactured by Clement Clarke International Ltd, Harlow, UK). Lung function was assessed by spirometry with subjects divided into four groups based on the severity of their airway obstruction using the GOLD criteria. The Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnea scale was used to assess dyspnea severity. Exercise capacity was assessed using the 6-minute walk test. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 23.0 software. In all the statistical tests, a p value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The mean age for the COPD patient and control population are 72.48 ± 8.01 and 70.69 ± 5.82 respectively. The control group had higher PIF than COPD group; however, only the clickhler and pMDI had statistically significant difference between the mean PIF of the patients compared with the control group. Generally, there was an observed trend of a decrease in mean PIF as the COPD stage progresses with a statistically significant difference observed for Easibreathe (F= 3.52, p= 0.019) and pressurized Metered dose inhaler (pMDI) (F= 4.26, p= 0.008). There was a significant positive correlation between FEV1%, FVC, Exercise capacity (6-minute walk distance) and PIF for Clickhaler, Autohaler, Easybreathe and pMDI. For pMDI, there was a statistically significant difference between means of PIF across the MMRC dyspnea scale with PIF decreasing with increasing severity of dyspnea (F= 2.85, p= 0.033). CONCLUSION: COPD patients have slightly lower PIF than controls. Poor exercise tolerance and lower spirometric pulmonary function parameters may contribute to low PIF.

INTRODUCTION: La bronchopneumopathie chronique obstructive (BPCO) est un trouble respiratoire chronique qui touche des millions de personnes dans le monde et la thérapie par inhalation est essentielle à la gestion symptomatique de la maladie. Par conséquent, il est nécessaire de connaître les exigences minimales en matière de débit inspiratoire de pointe (DIP) pour certains inhalateurs, en particulier les inhalateurs de poudre sèche (IPS), lors de la prescription d'un traitement par inhalation. L'objectif de cette étude est d'évaluer l'effet de la gravité de la BPCO sur le débit de pointe inspiratoire chez les patients atteints de BPCO. MÉTHODOLOGIES: Un total de 150 sujets (75 patients atteints de BPCO stable et 75 sujets apparemment sains) ont participé à l'étude. Le PIF a été évalué à l'aide du kit d'évaluation In-check Inhaler (fabriqué par Clement Clarke International Ltd, Harlow, UK). La fonction pulmonaire a été évaluée par spirométrie, les sujets étant répartis en quatre groupes en fonction de la gravité de l'obstruction des voies respiratoires selon les critères GOLD. L'échelle de dyspnée modifiée du Medical Research Council (MMRC) a été utilisée pour évaluer la sévérité de la dyspnée. La capacité d'exercice a été évaluée à l'aide du test de marche de 6 minutes. L'analyse statistique a été réalisée avec le logiciel SPSS 23.0. Dans tous les tests statistiques, une valeur p de <0,05 a été considérée comme significative. RÉSULTATS: L'âge moyen des patients atteints de BPCO et de la population de contrôle est respectivement de 72,48 ± 8,01 et 70,69 ± 5,82. Le groupe de contrôle avait un PIF plus élevé que le groupe BPCO; cependant, seuls le clickhler et le pMDI présentaient une différence statistiquement significative entre le PIF moyen des patients et celui du groupe de contrôle. D'une manière générale, on a observé une tendance à la diminution du FRP moyen au fur et à mesure de l'évolution de la BPCO, avec une différence statistiquement significative pour l'Easibreathe (F= 3,52, p= 0,019) et l'aérosol-doseur pressurisé (pMDI) (F= 4,26, p= 0,008). Il existe une corrélation positive significative entre le VEMS, la CVF, la capacité d'exercice (distance de marche de 6 minutes) et le PIF pour Clickhaler, Autohaler, Easybreathe et pMDI. Pour le pMDI, il y avait une différence statistiquement significative entre les moyennes de PIF sur l'échelle de dyspnée du MMRC, le PIF diminuant avec l'augmentation de la sévérité de la dyspnée (F= 2,85, p= 0,033). CONCLUSION: Les patients atteints de BPCO ont un PIF légèrement inférieur à celui des témoins. Une mauvaise tolérance à l'exercice et des paramètres spirométriques de la fonction pulmonaire plus faibles peuvent contribuer à la faiblesse du PIF. Mots clés: Maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique, Inhalateurs de poudre sèche, Débit inspiratoire de pointe, Aérosol-doseur pressurisé.

Relationship Between Rhinitis, Nasal Obstruction and Hypothyroidism: A Follow Up Study with Pre-post Treatment with Levothyroxine.

Hypothyroidism is the most common form of thyroid disorder in India, while, Rhinitis and Nasal obstruction are frequent complaints treated on regular basis in ENT OPD. Studies show that there is relationship between Rhinitis and Nasal obstruction with hypothyroidism. To assess the improvement in symptoms associated with Rhinitis and nasal obstruction in patients with hypothyroidism after treating with levothyroxine. 50 patients presenting in ENT OPD with rhinitis and nasal obstruction and diagnosed with hypothyroidism were selected. Complete history was taken and clinical examination was performed, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation Score, (NOSE) and Peak nasal inspiratory flow rate (PNIF) were noted. Biochemically proven hypothyroid patients were treated with adequate dosage of Levothyroxine. The patients were followed up and the above-mentioned tests were repeated at regular intervals (1 month and 3 month), Changes in these readings were recorded and maintained. Significant difference was found in TSH level, NOSE questionnaire, and PNIF reading in patients with hypothyroidism after treatment with levothyroxine (P value < 0.001). This was most commonly noted to occur in young and middle-aged population of age 15 years to 50 years (88%). In our study - An attempt was made to correlate the symptomatology with hypothyroidism. Treatment with levothyroxine in patients with rhinitis, nasal obstruction and biochemically proven hypothyroidism was found to be effective in improvement of symptoms. It was found that there is significant association between hypothyroid status and rhinitis with nasal obstruction.