The effects of social determinants of health on anterior cruciate ligament injury recovery.

Context: Over 200,000 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries occur in the United States each year. While many patients choose to pursue ACL reconstruction (ACLR), the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on outcomes is unclear. Objective: The purpose of this study was to review and synthesize current literature to determine the impact of SDOH on outcomes following ACL reconstruction. Data sources: A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, PsychINFO, and Scopus was completed. Study selection: Articles reporting outcomes following ACLR were included if they discussed at least one SDOH and provided ACLR failure rates. Study design: Systematic review. Level of evidence: Level I. Results: After screening 712 studies, 13 were found that met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Studies commonly examined the correlations between race, income, location, education, and insurance on outcomes following ACLR. Three studies found that the ACL revision risk for Black patients compared to White patients ranged from 0.23 to 0.78, while the revision risk for Hispanic patients compared to White patients ranged from 0.7 to 0.83. One study reported finding that the odds ratio of revision for the White patients was 1.32. Another study reported no difference in revision risk based on race. Patients living in urban areas were found to have improved outcomes compared to rural areas (Mean IKDC (Urban 85.3 vs Rural 81.87) and Tegner-Lysholm (Urban 88.26 vs Rural 84.82)). Lower socioeconomic status was correlated with decreased post-operative functional scores (KOOS, Marx and IKDC). Conclusion: Several SDOH such as White race, rural location, and low socioeconomic status may be independently correlated with worse ACLR outcomes in the form of increased revision rates or worse post-operative functional scores. However, further research is needed to better elucidate the degree of impact and interconnectedness of SDOH domains on ACLR patient outcomes.

Emission control status and future perspectives of diesel trucks in China.

Chinese diesel trucks are the main contributors to NOx and particulate matter (PM) vehicle emissions. An increase in diesel trucks could aggravate air pollution and damage human health. The Chinese government has recently implemented a series of emission control technologies and measures for air quality improvement. This paper summarizes recent control technologies and measures for diesel truck emissions in China and introduces the comprehensive application of control technologies and measures in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and surrounding regions. Remote online monitoring technology has been adopted according to the China VI standard for heavy-duty diesel trucks, and control measures such as transportation structure adjustment and heavy pollution enterprise classification control continue to support the battle action plan for pollution control. Perspectives and suggestions are provided for promoting pollution control and supervision of diesel truck emissions: adhere to the concept of overall management and control, vigorously promote the application of systematic and technological means in emission monitoring, continuously facilitate cargo transportation structure adjustment and promote new energy freight vehicles. This paper aims to accelerate the implementation of control technologies and measures throughout China. China is endeavouring to control diesel truck exhaust pollution. China is willing to cooperate with the world to protect the global ecological environment.

Validated patient reported outcome measures in speech-language pathology: A scoping review of adult practice.

PURPOSE: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to inform value-based healthcare. Within speech-language pathology (SLP), there is no synthesis of validated PROMs to guide professional practice. This scoping review systematically identifies and evaluates condition-specific PROMs across adult SLP practice. METHOD: A literature search was performed to identify studies published until 18th February 2022 from MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane Collaboration, and Web of Science. Abstracts and full texts were screened in Covidence. Relevant studies that validated PROMs in English were extracted and assessed using the "Checklist to operationalise measurement characteristics of PROMs" by two independent reviewers. RESULT: Ninety-seven articles provided validation data for 71 PROMS across seven SLP practice areas. These included voice (n = 18), swallowing (n = 14), language (n = 11), fluency (n = 8), speech (n = 4), laryngectomy (n = 3), and cognitive-communication (n = 2). No PROMs were identified for augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) (n = 0). Quality ratings were variable on the Francis et al. checklist. CONCLUSION: A range of validated PROMs were identified to guide SLP practice in measuring patient perceptions across a range of practice areas in adults. Opportunities for further development in SLP practice areas with limited PROMs, such as speech, cognitive-communication, and AAC are also highlighted.

A Collection of Components to Design Clinical Dashboards Incorporating Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: A clinical dashboard is a data-driven clinical decision support tool visualizing multiple key performance indicators in a single report while minimizing time and effort for data gathering. Studies have shown that including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical dashboards supports the clinician's understanding of how treatments impact patients' health status, helps identify changes in health-related quality of life at an early stage, and strengthens patient-physician communication. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine design components for clinical dashboards incorporating PROMs to inform software producers and users (ie, physicians). METHODS: We conducted interviews with software producers and users to test preselected design components. Furthermore, the interviews allowed us to derive additional components that are not outlined in existing literature. Finally, we used inductive and deductive coding to derive a guide on which design components need to be considered when building a clinical dashboard incorporating PROMs. RESULTS: A total of 25 design components were identified, of which 16 were already surfaced during the literature search. Furthermore, 9 additional components were derived inductively during our interviews. The design components are clustered in a generic dashboard, PROM-related, adjacent information, and requirements for adoption components. Both software producers and users agreed on the primary purpose of a clinical dashboard incorporating PROMs to enhance patient communication in outpatient settings. Dashboard benefits include enhanced data visualization and improved workflow efficiency, while interoperability and data collection were named as adoption challenges. Consistency in dashboard design components is preferred across different episodes of care, with adaptations only for disease-specific PROMs. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical dashboards have the potential to facilitate informed treatment decisions if certain design components are followed. This study establishes a comprehensive framework of design components to guide the development of effective clinical dashboards incorporating PROMs in health care practice.

Effectiveness and safety of adjunctive non-drug measures in improving respiratory symptoms among patients with severe COVID-19: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection posed a huge threat and burden to public healthcare in late 2022. Non-drug measures of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), such as acupuncture, cupping and moxibustion, are commonly used as adjuncts in China to help in severe cases, but their effects remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: To observe the clinical effect of TCM non-drug measures in improving respiratory function and symptoms among patients with severe COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: This study was designed as a multicenter, assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial. Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were randomly assigned to the treatment or control group. The treatment group received individualized TCM non-drug measures in combination with prone position ventilation, while the control group received prone position ventilation only for 5 consecutive days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the percentage of patients with improved oxygen saturation (SpO2) at the end of the 5-day intervention, as well as changes of patients' respiratory rates. The secondary outcome measures included changes in SpO2 and total score on the self-made respiratory symptom scale. The improvement rate, defined as a 3-day consecutive increase in SpO2, the duration of prone positioning, and adverse events were recorded as well. RESULTS: Among the 198 patients included in the intention-to-treat analysis, 159 (80.3%) completed all assessments on day 5, and 39 (19.7%) patients withdrew from the study. At the end of the intervention, 71 (91%) patients in the treatment group had SpO2 above 93%, while 61 (75.3%) in the control group reached this level. The proportion of participant with improved SpO2 was significantly greater in the intervention group (mean difference [MD] = 15.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.4, 27.1; P = 0.008). Compared to the baseline, with daily treatment there were significant daily decreases in respiratory rates in both groups, but no statistical differences between groups were found (all P ≥ 0.05). Compared to the control group, the respiratory-related symptoms score was lower among patients in the treatment group (MD = -1.7; 95%CI: -2.8, -0.5; P = 0.008) after day 3 of treatment. A gradual decrease in the total scores of both groups was also observed. Thirty-one adverse events occurred during the intervention, and 2 patients were transferred to the intensive care unit due to deterioration of their illness. CONCLUSION: TCM non-drug measures combined with prone positioning can effectively treat patients with severe COVID-19. The combined therapy significantly increased SpO2 and improved symptom scores compared to prone positioning alone, thus improving the patients' respiratory function to help them recover. However, the improvement rate did not differ between the two groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300068319). Please cite this article as: Yin X, Jin Z, Li F, Huang L, Hu YM, Zhu BC, Wang ZQ, Li XY, Li JP, Lao LX, Mi YQ, Xu SF. Effectiveness and safety of adjunctive non-drug measures in improving respiratory symptoms among patients with severe COVID-19: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Integr Med. 2024; Epub ahead of print.

Clinical trials involving rare gynaecological cancers.

Clinical trials that investigate therapies for rare gynaecological cancers (RGC) are essential to provide evidence-based data towards new effective and safe treatments, however, they present unique challenges. The main objective of this narrative review is to summarize completed phase III clinical trials investigating therapies for RGC and to discuss the outcomes of these trials. PRISMA guidelines were used to report the steps of the review. We searched the WHO's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed/Medline for publications reporting results from clinical trials on RGC including at least one medication. From 31 identified phase III clinical trials, 13 were still ongoing, four were terminated and just eight (25.8 %) had posted results and/or publications. The latter completed trials were mostly multi-center and located in at least two continents, participants were mainly adults, and the recruitment period varied from about 2.5 to 10.5 years. Allocation was randomized with parallel assignment in 7 out of 8 trials, while only one trial had double masking. The most common primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS), followed by overall survival (OS). Patient-reported outcomes were secondary outcome measures in four completed trials, assessing quality of life by various questionnaires. Most of the trials did not meet their primary endpoints. By highlighting the scarcity of clinical trials on RGC, our findings further emphasize the need for designing, conducting and sustaining phase III clinical trials to investigate innovative therapies for these conditions and report meaningful outcome measures.

An Observational Study to Evaluate Readability and Reliability of AI-Generated Brochures for Emergency Medical Conditions.

Introduction The study assesses the readability of AI-generated brochures for common emergency medical conditions like heart attack, anaphylaxis, and syncope. Thus, the study aims to compare the AI-generated responses for patient information guides of common emergency medical conditions using ChatGPT and Google Gemini. Methodology Brochures for each condition were created by both AI tools. Readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Calculator, evaluating word count, sentence count and ease of understanding. Reliability was measured using the Modified DISCERN Score. The similarity between AI outputs was determined using Quillbot. Statistical analysis was performed with R (v4.3.2). Results ChatGPT and Gemini produced brochures with no statistically significant differences in word count (p= 0.2119), sentence count (p=0.1276), readability (p=0.3796), or reliability (p=0.7407). However, ChatGPT provided more detailed content with 32.4% more words (582.80 vs. 440.20) and 51.6% more sentences (67.00 vs. 44.20). In addition, Gemini's brochures were slightly easier to read with a higher ease score (50.62 vs. 41.88). Reliability varied by topic with ChatGPT scoring higher for Heart Attack (4 vs. 3) and Choking (3 vs. 2), while Google Gemini scored higher for Anaphylaxis (4 vs. 3) and Drowning (4 vs. 3), highlighting the need for topic-specific evaluation. Conclusions Although AI-generated brochures from ChatGPT and Gemini are comparable in readability and reliability for patient information on emergency medical conditions, this study highlights that there is no statistically significant difference in the responses generated by the two AI tools.

Meaningful patient and public engagement in dissemination-embedding co-production in dementia research.

Background: Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) is still underutilised in both dementia research and corresponding dissemination activities. Aim: To describe the methods, format, and lessons learned in co-creating and co-producing a dissemination strategy for a research project focused on establishing patient-centred outcome measures into routine palliative community care for persons living with dementia (PLWD) and their informal carers. Materials and methods: A participatory, hybrid-format workshop was conducted to co-create the dissemination strategy with a PPIE group. A video presentation of findings and a list of prompts shared prior to the workshop were used to elicit views on dissemination strategies and knowledge translation. The workshop was followed up with a survey to consolidate the dissemination strategy. Workshop minutes and survey responses were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis. Results: 22 participants from our diverse PPIE group attended the workshop. Two major themes emerged: (a) Knowledge translation: building bridges between research and practise, and (b) Collaboration and dissemination: everyone's voice is needed. Participants suggested critical changes to dissemination methods and materials. Successful knowledge translation depends on a strong evidence base. For this, materials need to be tailored to specific audiences. Everyone's voice needs to be integrated through co-production in dissemination activities by PPIE members to influence societal change. Tailored dissemination activities within a dissemination strategy were co-created spanning all phases of the research cycle. Discussion: Informing and educating the public and policymakers about the needs of PLWD relies on disseminating and fostering knowledge translation throughout all phases of the research cycle.

Categories of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale Activities in Chronic Neck Pain and Their Relationship to the Neck Disability Index.

Intoduction: Common outcome measures for chronic neck pain are the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) and the neck disability index (NDI). The primary aim was to categorize the top-rated, patient-selected functional activity limitations of the PSFS to determine if there were consistent limited functional activities for individuals with chronic neck pain and how these compared to the constructs of activities on the NDI. The secondary aim was to determine the relationship between scores for individuals who completed both the NDI and PSFS. Design: A retrospective review of data extracted from the electronic medical record, EPIC, within two hospital-based outpatient physical therapy clinics within a health care system. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on individual's characteristics, self-selected functional activity limitations, and total scores of the PSFS and NDI. Most common categories of self-selected functional activity limitations were developed by practicing physical therapists. These functional activity limitation categories of the PSFS were compared to the activities of the NDI. Mean PSFS total scores were correlated with the NDI total scores with Spearman's test. Results: Participants were individuals with chronic neck pain from January 2013-September 2018 (n = 2283). Movement-based activities accounted for 60.8% of the functional activity limitations of the PSFS with the top functional activity limitations being cervical motion and exercise (32%). The PSFS total score moderately correlated with NDI (r = -0.50, p = <0.01) which may relate to the differences in constructs of the NDI and the top patient-selected PSFS functional activity limitations found in this analysis. Conclusion: The results suggest that individuals with chronic neck pain present with similar categories of self-selected functional activity limitations that differ from activities of the NDI. Additional research is needed to improve outcome measures to capture patient-selected functional activity limitations and an individual's pain experience.

Quality of life and psychological distress in end-stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Among diverse profound impacts on patients' quality of life (QoL), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) frequently results in increased levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. Renal replacement therapies such as hemodialysis (HD) and transplantation (TX) are intended to enhance QoL, although their ability to alleviate psychological distress remains uncertain. This research posits the existence of a significant correlation between negative emotional states and QoL among ESRD patients, with varying effects observed in HD and TX patients. AIM: To examine the relationship between QoL and negative emotional states (depression, anxiety, and stress) and predicted QoL in various end-stage renal replacement therapy patients with ESRD. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included HD or TX patients in the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. The 36-item Short Form Survey and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS) was used for data collection, and correlation and regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The HD and TX transplantation groups showed statistically significant inverse relationships between QoL and DASS scores. HD patients with high anxiety levels and less education scored low on the physical component summary (PCS). In addition, the results of the mental component summary (MCS) were associated with reduced depression. Compared with older transplant patients, TX patients' PCS scores were lower, and depression, stress, and negative working conditions were highly correlated with MCS scores. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study revealed notable connections between well-being and mental turmoil experienced by individuals undergoing HD and TX. The PCS of HD patients is affected by heightened levels of anxiety and lower educational attainment, while the MCS of transplant patients is influenced by advancing age and elevated stress levels. These insights will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of patient support.

Natural outbreak of Mycobacterium caprae infection in imported laboratory cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis): diagnostic pitfalls and management of safety precautions.

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major health threat for humans and for non-human primates used for toxicology or research purposes. Emerging mycobacterial species represent a major challenge for diagnosis and surveillance programs. Here, we report a natural outbreak of Mycobacterium caprae in imported cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis) that occurred at AnaPath Research S.A.U. (APR). The macaques underwent repeated negative intradermal tuberculin tests (IDT) before importation and at the European quarantine station. Exhaustive TB screening was started at APR after confirmation of one positive case at another facility. The animal in question belonged to the same colony received at APR. Diagnostic approaches included clinical examination, PCR, culture, spoligotyping, IDT testing, interferon-γ release assay (IGRA), and thoracoabdominal ultrasound (US). Three regulatory toxicity studies and stock animals were affected. The macaques lacked clinical signs, except for one showing a fistulizing nodule in the right inguinal area, which tested positive for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by PCR. All animals were necropsied and 10 macaques (n=114) showed gross and histologic findings compatible with TB confirmed by PCR and culture. M. caprae was identified as the etiological agent by Direct Variable Repeat spacer oligonucleotide typing (DVR spoligotyping). The infection was traced to Asia via the SB1622 spoligotype involved, confirming that the animals were infected prior to their import into Europe. Tuberculin skin test (TST), IGRA, and US were only sensitive in detecting advanced cases of M. caprae infection. One staff member showed a positive TST reaction, which was handled in accordance with the Spanish government's health regulations. All the sanitary measures implemented were effective in eradicating the disease.

Global resurgence of pertussis: A perspective from China.

Pertussis (or whooping cough) is a highly infectious acute respiratory disease primarily caused by Bordetella pertussis, which is also one of the most important causes of infant death worldwide. The widespread use of vaccines has greatly reduced the morbidity and mortality of pertussis. However, since the 1980s, in a number of countries with high vaccine coverage, the incidence of pertussis has risen again after remaining low for many years, with outbreaks even occurring in some areas. The peak onset of pertussis is shifting from infancy to adolescence, and adolescence is becoming the main source of infection for infants. Despite the increasing incidence of pertussis, serological findings suggest that the true prevalence of the disease may be significantly underestimated. Therefore, in this narrative review, we summarize the pathogenic process and immune characteristics of bacteria, the diagnosis and treatment of diseases, as well as vaccination and prevalence of pertussis at home and abroad, and attempt to analyze the causes and influencing factors of pertussis resurgence and summarize some prevention and control strategies to assist in improving the understanding of pertussis and preventing unexpected outbreaks.

Roles of different organizations in implementing patient-reported measures in routine maternity care in Finland.

BACKGROUND: The integration of patient-centered care (PCC) and value-based healthcare (VBHC) principles, emphasizing personalized, responsive care and cost efficiency, is crucial in modern healthcare. Despite advocation from the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) for the global adoption of these principles through patient-reported measures (PRMs), their implementation, especially the pregnancy and childbirth (PCB) set, remains limited in maternity care. This study focuses on understanding the optimal organizational entity for integrating standard ICHOM-PCB-PRMs into routine maternity care in Finland. It aims to clarify the distribution of tasks among stakeholders and gather Finnish maternity healthcare professionals' perspectives on organizational responsibility in PRM collection. The emphasis was on identifying the optimal organizational framework for managing PRMs in maternity care. RESULTS: A total of 66 maternity healthcare professionals participated in the study, reaching a consensus that public maternity care centers in Finland should be the primary entity responsible for managing PRMs in the maternity sector. Key aspects such as confidence with the role as a mother, maternal confidence with breastfeeding, and satisfaction with the result of care were identified as crucial and should be inquired about in both public maternity care centers and hospital maternity wards. The findings highlight the importance of comprehensive and consistent attention to these PRMs across public maternity care centers and hospital maternity settings to ensure holistic and effective maternal care. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the central role of public maternity care centers in the collection and management of PRMs within Finnish maternity care, as agreed upon by the professional consensus. It underscores the importance of a consistent and holistic approach to PRM inquiry across different care settings to enhance the quality and effectiveness of maternity care. This finding is crucial for policymakers and healthcare practitioners, suggesting that reinforcing the collaborative efforts between public maternity care centers and hospital maternity wards is vital for a patient-centric, efficient healthcare system. Aligning with PCC and VBHC principles, this approach aims to improve healthcare outcomes for pregnant and postpartum women in Finland, emphasizing the need for a unified strategy in managing maternity care.

Organic fertilizer improved the lead and cadmium metal tolerance of Eucalyptus camaldulensis by enhancing the uptake of potassium, phosphorus, and calcium.

Phytoremediation is a strategy for the amelioration of soil heavy metal contamination that aligns with ecological sustainability principles. Among the spectrum of phytoremediation candidates, woody plants are considered particularly adept for their substantial biomass, profound root systems, and non-participation in the food chain. This study used Eucalyptus camaldulensis-a tree species characterized for its high biomass and rapid growth rate-to assess its growth and metal uptake in mining tailings. The results were as follows: exposure to heavy metals reduced the E. camaldulensis uptake of potassium (K), phosphorus (P), and calcium (Ca). Heavy metal stress negatively affected the biomass of E. camaldulensis. Lead (Pb) primarily accumulated in the roots, while cadmium (Cd) predominantly accumulated in the stems. The application of organic fertilizers bolstered the stress tolerance of E. camaldulensis, mitigating the adverse impacts of heavy metal stress. A synergistic effect occurred when organic fertilizers were combined with bacterial fertilizers. The plant's enrichment capacity for Cd and its tolerance to Pb was augmented through the concurrent application of bacterial and organic fertilizers. Collectively, the application of organic fertilizers improved the heavy metal tolerance of E. camaldulensis by enhancing the uptake of K, P, and Ca and elevating the content of glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and gibberellin acid (GA) in roots. These findings provided nascent groundwork for breeding E. camaldulensis with enhanced heavy metal tolerance. Moreover, this proved the potentiality of E. camaldulensis for the management of heavy metal-contaminated tailings and offers a promising avenue for future environmental restoration.

Translation and Validation of Dizziness Handicap Inventory in Hindi Language.

The dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) is a widely used questionnaire for assessing the impact of dizziness on daily life. There is a need for validated translations of the DHI to accommodate diverse linguistic populations, enabling clinical and research comparisons. This study aimed to translate and validate the DHI into Hindi language. The DHI was translated into Hindi following established guidelines. The translated version underwent validation among Hindi-speaking patients presenting with dizziness at an outpatient ENT clinic in this cross-sectional study. Reliability and validity analyses were conducted, including Cronbach's alpha, split-half reliability, and factor analysis. A total of 153 participants completed the DHI-Hindi, with a mean score of 37.28 (SD = 15.63). Ceiling and floor effects were absent. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the overall scale was 0.785, indicating good reliability. Factor analysis revealed a three-factor solution, consistent with previous studies, indicating good construct validity.The translation and validation process yielded a reliable and valid version of the DHI in Hindi language, suitable for assessing the impact of dizziness in Hindi-speaking population.

Australian adaptation and external validation of Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis-RA-Patient Reported Experience Measure (CQRA-RA-PREM).

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity of an adapted Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis-RA-Patient-Reported Experience Measure (CQRA-RA-PREM) for assessing care experience in an Australian rheumatology outpatient cohort. Methods: Individual patient interviews were performed to check the language and completion time of the CQRA-RA-PREM before modification. Australian Rheumatology Association Database (ARAD) participants completed the CQRA-PREM-Australian version (CQRA-PREM-AU) (22 items, 5 domains), disease activity measure (RAPID-3, BASDAI) and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQOL-6D) index. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) assessed item correlation. Cronbach's α assessed internal consistency. Results: Individual patient interviews (n = 8, 62% male, mean age 50 years, mean disease duration 4.5 years) informed CQRA-RA-PREM modification. The ARAD survey response rate was 707/1124 (63%); 459 (65%) RA, 134 (19%) PsA, 114 (16%) AS; 67% female, mean age 62 years, mean disease duration 22 years. The median instrument completion time was 299 s (interquartile range 284-414). Scoring of responses allowed an averaged overall score. EFA extracted five factors: all items loading similarly onto factor 1, indicating validity of the overall score. The CQRA-PREM-AU score correlated with the AQOL-6D score (ρ = 0.23, P < 0.01); partial correlation with disease activity was not significant (ρ = 0.03, P = 0.45), indicating divergent validity. Reliability was comparable across disease subgroups (Cronbach's α >0.94). The mean overall score did not differ by disease subgroup [4.1 (s.d. 0.6, P = 0.73) and there was no floor/ceiling effect. Conclusion: CQRA-PREM-AU is a valid and reliable instrument to measure self-reported care experience in Australian rheumatology patients and may be interpreted as an average overall numerical score.

Assessment of Pain Severity and Grip Strength as the Most Accurate Predictors of the Outcome of Treatment of Distal Radial Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Distal radial fractures are common injuries, accounting for approximately 25% of fractures in the paediatric population and up to 18% of all fractures in the elderly age group. Assessment of treatment outcomes of these fractures includes objective measurements of wrist joint range of motion and grip strength as well as subjective parameters such as the intensity of perceived pain, hand function and quality of life. The recent years have ushered in a trend towards using several outcome measures for a more comprehensive evaluation of the results of the treatment. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the assessment of pain severity and grip strength is sufficiently accurate for correct assessment of the outcome of the treatment of distal radial fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and two patients, 79 women (77%) and 23 men (23%), at a mean age of 54 years with distal radial fractures were treated operatively. Treatment outcomes were assessed at 3 and 6 months by measurements of intensity of pain (according to a numerical rating scale, NRS), grip strength (with a dynamometer) and hand function with the DASH questionnaire. The results of these measurements were compared in order to investigate the strength of the possible correlation between variables. RESULTS: An analysis of the correlation between the variables of interest at 3 and 6 months' assessment showed statistically significant correlations (Spearman rank test, R=0,26-0,41; p<0,01). The NRS correlated negatively with grip strength (less pain - greater strength) and positively with DASH scores (less pain - better hand function). The correlation between grip strength and the DASH was the strongest (Spearman rank test R=0,61; p<0,001, showing that greater power of the hand indicated better function, whereas weaker grip indicated worse function. CONCLUSIONS: 1. The severity of pain and the degree of weakness of the hand show (independently of each other) a very good correlation with the comprehensive assessment of hand function using the DASH questionnaire. 2. It follows that pain severity and hand weakness are sufficient to reliably assess the outcome of the treatment of a distal radius fracture.

[What determines the overall quality of postoperative pain management? A question of perspective]. / Was ist ausschlaggebend für die Gesamtqualität der postoperativen Schmerztherapie? Eine Frage der Perspektive.

BACKGROUND: The outcome domains pain intensity, pain-related interference, side effects, (treatment) information, participation and personal interaction have all been identified as relevant factors in the management of perioperative pain. However, it is not yet clear which of these are particularly significant for the subjectively perceived overall quality of postoperative pain management. AIM: A newly developed questionnaire was used in this cross-sectional study to assess the relevance of these domains for patients and compare the relevance to healthcare professionals (HCP). METHODS: The patient survey (n = 40) was conducted on the first postoperative day at Jena University Hospital, Germany. In order to investigate group differences, 63 HCP (disciplines: n = 15 anaesthesiology, n = 17 surgery, n = 31 nursing) were recruited. The questionnaire primarily included all pairwise comparisons between the domains with regard to the overall quality of postoperative pain management. The resulting sum scores for each domain were the primary outcome measure, which were analysed using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Within the group of patients, there were significant differences in the prioritization of the six outcome domains, with personal interaction followed by intensity and interference having received the highest ratings. There were also significant differences within the domains between the perspectives of patients and HCP, as well as between the HCP themselves. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that personal interaction and the reduction of pain intensity and interference are three key factors that are significant for patients' experience of postoperative pain management. However, the extent to which the harmonisation of these three factors with those given prominence by HCP would positively impact postoperative pain management remains unclear and should be investigated further.

Environmental, climatic, socio-economic factors and non-pharmacological interventions: A comprehensive four-domain risk assessment of COVID-19 hospitalization and death in Northern Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Up to now, studies on environmental, climatic, socio-economic factors, and non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) show diverse associations, often contrasting, with COVID-19 spread or severity. Most studies used large-scale, aggregated data, with limited adjustment for individual factors, most of them focused on viral spread than severe outcomes. Moreover, evidence simultaneously evaluating variables belonging to different exposure domains is scarce, and none analysing their collective impact on an individual level. METHODS: Our population-based retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the comprehensive role played by exposure variables belonging to four different domains, environmental, climatic, socio-economic, and non-pharmacological interventions (NPI), on individual COVID-19-related risk of hospitalization and death, analysing data from all patients (no. 68472) tested positive to a SARS-CoV-2 swab in Modena Province (Northern Italy) between February 2020 and August 2021. Using adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, we estimated the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, investigating dose-response relationships through restricted cubic spline modelling for hazard ratios. RESULTS: Several significant associations emerged: long-term exposure to air pollutants (NO2, PM10, PM2.5) was linked to hospitalization risk in a complex way and showed an increased risk for death; while humidity was inversely associated; temperature showed a U-shaped risk; wind speed showed a linear association with both outcomes. Precipitation increased hospitalization risk but decreased mortality. Socio-economic and NPI indices showed clear linear associations, respectively negative and positive, with both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings offer insights for evidence-based policy decisions, improving precision healthcare practices, and safeguarding public health in future pandemics. Refinement of pandemic response plans by healthcare authorities could benefit significantly.

Positive experiences with the use of an eHealth smartphone application during the treatment of an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the patient perceived satisfaction and feasibility of a personalized eHealth application (app) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: Patients were offered to download the app prior to undergoing AAA surgery, in a prospective single centre cohort study, using a mixed methods sequential explanatory design. It offers information via the timely delivery of push notifications with text, images, and videos. The information includes chapters regarding the AAA, surgical techniques (endovascular aneurysm repair and open surgical repair), and perioperative lifestyle advice such as; physical exercise programmes, healthy and protein rich diet, geriatric care, and to stop smoking or drinking alcohol. RESULTS: The app was installed by 59/65 patients (91%). After installation, six patients deactivated the app (10%). The mean age was 74 years (SD = 7) and 85% of patients were male. The app was opened a median of 67 times (interquartile range [IQR] 33-127) and with a median time interval of 50 hours (IQR 28-74). Overall, 90% (53/59) completed a satisfaction questionnaire. On a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10, the median scored satisfaction for guidance was 8 (IQR 6-8), provided information was 8 (IQR 6-8), usefulness was 7 (IQR 6-8.5), and for recommending it to others 8 (IQR 6-9). Using purposeful sampling, seven patients underwent a semi-structured interview on user-experience of the app. They described experiencing positive changes to lifestyle habits, and appreciating the ability to share it with loved ones or informal caregivers. Several areas of improvement were reported. CONCLUSION: The personalized eHealth app is feasible in older AAA patients and valued as a useful supplement to the standard of care. We argue that the app aids in managing a prehabilitation programme, aids in the digital transformation of healthcare, and thereby decreases the workload of hospital staff.