Arthroscopic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with polyethylene suture combined with medial retinaculum plication for the treatment of acute patellar dislocation in young and middle-aged patients with a follow-up of at least 2 years.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to propose a surgical technique for arthroscopic medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with polyethylene suture combined with medial retinaculum plication and to evaluate the efficacy of this surgical technique in the treatment of acute patellar dislocation. METHODS: Clinical data of patients with acute patellar dislocations treated with arthroscopic MPFL reconstruction with polyethylene tape (FiberTape) combined with medial support band compression were analyzed retrospectively from January 2018 to January 2021. The mean age of the patients was 25.15 ± 4.66 years; the mean follow-up time was 27.5 (24-36) months. Clinical evaluation consisted of apprehension test results, patellar extrapolation test results, Lysholm score, Kujala score, and IKDC score, the Patellar lateral shift distance and patellar tilt angle (PTA) measured by CT scan. RESULTS: All patients had no recurrent patellar dislocation or subluxation after surgery, and the apprehension test was negative. In all patients, the Kujala score (36.0 ± 9.9 vs. 98.2 ± 3.1), the IKDC score (48.6 ± 7.0 vs. 90.6 ± 4.4) and the Lysholm score (32.8 ± 10.4 vs. 96.7 ± 3.1) had improved at the 24-month follow up (P < 0.05). In addition, PTA was significantly lower at the 12-month follow-up and 24-giving-month follow-up compared to the preoperative period (P < 0.05, Table 2). The patellar lateral shift distance decreased from 14.94 ± 6.11 mm preoperatively to 3.00 ± 1.40 mm (12-month follow up) and 3.26 ± 1.37 mm (24-month follow up), respectively. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic MPFL reconstruction with polyethylene suture combined with medial retinaculum plication is a safe and reliable surgical technique for the treatment of acute patellar dislocation in young and middle-aged patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic Study.

Effect of Medial Patellofemoral Complex Reconstruction Technique on Patellofemoral Contact Pressure, Contact Area, and Kinematics.

BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is considered by many to be the gold standard to treat lateral patellar instability; however, some investigators have reported good clinical results after isolated medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament (MQTFL) reconstruction or a combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction. A handful of studies have preliminarily investigated the biomechanical consequences of these various medial patellar stabilizing procedures. Despite this, no existing study has included multiple medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) reconstructions and assessment of lateral patellar translation at distinct flexion angles. HYPOTHESIS: Combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction would restore patellofemoral contact areas, forces, and kinematics closest to the native state compared with isolated reconstruction of the MPFL or MQTFL alone. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten adult cadaveric knee specimens were prepared and analyzed under 5 different conditions: (1) intact state, (2) transected MPFC, (3) isolated MPFL reconstruction, (4) isolated MQTFL reconstruction, and (5) combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction. Patellar tilt, lateral patellar translation, patellofemoral contact forces, and patellofemoral contact areas were measured in each condition from 0° to 80° through simulated knee flexion using a custom servohydraulic load frame with pressure sensor technology and a motion capture system for kinematic data acquisition. RESULTS: The isolated MPFL, isolated MQTFL, and combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction conditions produced significantly less lateral patellar tilt compared with the transected MPFC state (P < .05). No statistically significant differences were found when each reconstruction technique was compared with the intact state in patellar tilt, lateral patellar translation, contact forces, and contact areas. CONCLUSION: All 3 reconstruction techniques (isolated MPFL reconstruction, isolated MQTFL reconstruction, and combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction) restored native knee kinematics, contact forces, and contact areas without overconstraint. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Isolated MPFL reconstruction, isolated MQTFL reconstruction, and combined MPFL/MQTFL reconstruction all restore patellofemoral stability comparable with the intact MPFC state without the overconstraint that could be concerning for increasing risk of patellofemoral arthritis.

Three different patellar fixation techniques yield similar clinical and radiological outcomes in recurrent patellar dislocation undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of three different patellar fixation techniques on medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) in the treatment of patellar dislocation (PD). METHODS: Between 2015 and 2020, 130 patients with recurrent PD who underwent surgical reconstruction were eligible for this retrospective study: 48 patients were treated with the semi-tunnel bone bridge fixation technique (Group A), 42 patients were treated with the suture anchor fixation technique (Group B) and 40 patients were treated with the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique (Group C). Clinical outcomes included functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores), activity levels (Tegner activity score and return to sports), physical examinations, patellar re-dislocation rate and complications. Radiological outcomes included patellar congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar translation and lateral patellar angle. RESULTS: All clinical and radiological outcomes improved significantly in all groups, without any significant difference among these three groups. At the final follow-up, no re-dislocation occurred, and all groups achieved a successful return to sports. However, the semi-tunnel bone bridge and suture anchor fixation techniques showed statistically higher Tegner activity scores (p = 0.004) and shorter time from surgery to return to sports (p = 0.007) than the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique. CONCLUSION: The three MPFLR patellar fixation techniques achieved favourable and comparable clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of PD. Compared with the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique, the semi-tunnel bone bridge and suture anchor fixation techniques may be more effective with higher activity levels. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Early Postoperative Rapid Rehabilitation Yields More Favorable Short-term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Patellar Realignment Surgery for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Use of a rapid rehabilitation protocol for postoperative recovery after recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) has gradually gained attention; nonetheless, evidence of its safety and effectiveness is lacking. PURPOSE: To compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of early rapid rehabilitation with those of conservative rehabilitation in patients with RPD. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with RPD who underwent tibial tubercle osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction were enrolled between January 2018 and February 2019. Postoperatively, the patients were randomly assigned to either the early rapid group (rapid group; n = 25 patients) or the conservative group (control group; n = 25 patients) for rehabilitation training. The rapid group underwent faster progression in weightbearing and range of motion (ROM) training. Knee joint functional scores, ROM, bilateral thigh circumference differences, and imaging data were recorded preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively for comparison. Postoperative complications were recorded over the 24-month follow-up period. RESULTS: The baseline data did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Postoperatively, compared with the control group, the rapid group had higher Tegner scores at 6 weeks and 3 months; higher Lysholm scores at 3 and 6 months; higher International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months; better ROM; and smaller bilateral thigh circumference differences at 24 months (P < .05 for all). However, no differences were observed in the Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 24 months postoperatively. At the 6-week and subsequent follow-up visits, the Caton and Insall indices were lower in the control group than in the rapid group (P < .01 for all). Moreover, compared with the control group, the rapid group had a lower incidence of patella baja at 24 months (0% vs 17%) and fewer complications during the whole follow-up period (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Early rapid postoperative rehabilitation appears to be safe and effective for patients who undergo tibial tubercle osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to treat RPD. In the short term, this approach was shown to be more advantageous than conservative rehabilitation in improving functional scores, allowing an earlier return to daily activities, although the lack of difference at 24 months implies no long-term benefits. In addition, it potentially helped to prevent the occurrence of complications, including patella baja. REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1800014648 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

The thickness change ratio and preservation ratio of the infrapatellar fat pad are related to anterior knee pain in patients following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) lies extrasynovial and intracapsular, preserving the joint cavity and serving as a biochemical regulator of inflammatory reactions. However, there is a lack of research on the relationship between anterior knee pain (AKP) and the IPFP after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR). Pinpointing the source of pain enables clinicians to promptly manage and intervene, facilitating personalized rehabilitation and improving patient prognosis. METHODS: A total of 181 patients were included in the study. These patients were divided into the AKP group (n = 37) and the control group (n = 144). Clinical outcomes included three pain-related scores, Tegner activity score, patient satisfaction, etc. Imaging outcomes included the IPFP thickness, IPFP fibrosis, and the IPFP thickness change and preservation ratio. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the independent factors associated with AKP. Finally, the correlation between independent factors and three pain-related scores was analyzed to verify the results. RESULTS: The control group had better postoperative pain-related scores and Tegner activity score than the AKP group (P < 0.01). The AKP group had lower IPFP thickness change ratio and preservation ratio (P < 0.001), and smaller IPFP thickness (P < 0.05). The multivariate analysis revealed that the IPFP thickness change ratio [OR = 0.895, P < 0.001] and the IPFP preservation ratio [OR = 0.389, P < 0.001] were independent factors related to AKP, with a significant correlation between these factors and pain-related scores [|r| > 0.50, P < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the lower IPFP change ratio and preservation ratio may be independent factors associated with AKP after MPFLR. Early detection and targeted intervention of the underlying pain sources can pave the way for tailored rehabilitation programs and improved surgical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE LEVEL III.

Midterm Outcomes of Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Patellar Instability in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.

Background: Patellar instability is frequently encountered in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS). The clinical outcomes of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) for patellar instability in patients with EDS are unknown. Purpose: To evaluate midterm clinical outcomes of isolated MPFLR for patellar instability in patients with EDS and factors affecting these outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: In a retrospective study, 31 patients (n = 47 knees) with EDS and patellar instability who underwent isolated MPFLR for recurrent patellar instability between 2008 and 2017 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. Preoperative radiographic images were measured for anatomic risk factors. Clinical outcomes-including postoperative complications-were evaluated. Factors associated with MPFLR failure were identified. Postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs)-including the pediatric version of the International Knee Documentation Committee, the Kujala score, the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale, the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0, and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-were collected, and factors affecting PRO scores were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 14.9 ± 2 years. At a mean follow-up of 7.2 years, 18 of 47 (38.3%) knees required reoperations, of which 9 of 47 (19.1%) knees required revision stabilization for recurrent patellar instability. Also, 7 of 31 knees (22.6%) with autografts failed compared with 2 of 16 (12.5%) with allografts (P = .69). For autografts, 6 of 17 (35.3%) failures occurred with gracilis, but 0 of 13 (0%) occurred with semitendinosus (P = .02). Compared with patients without failures, patients with failed primary MPFLR were significantly younger (P = .0005) and were able to touch the palm to the floor with their knees extended (P = .03). For radiographic parameters, the patellar height and tilt were significantly higher in the failure group. The postoperative PROs were suboptimal at a mean follow-up of 5.2 years. All but 1 patient were satisfied with the final outcome. Conclusion: At the midterm follow-up, 38.3% of patients with EDS required further surgery after isolated MPFLR for patellar instability; half of these revisions (19.1%) were to address recurrent instability. Recurrent instability after isolated MPFLR was more likely in younger patients and those who could touch the palm to the floor with their knees extended. Postoperative PROs were inferior; nonetheless, patient satisfaction was high.

Plantaris Tendon Autograft Can Restore Patellar Stability in Adolescent Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Technical Note.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is a standard treatment option for patients with patellar instability. The main purpose of this study was to determine whether isolated anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using double folded, four-strand plantaris tendon autograft restores patellar stability in adolescent patients. Plantaris tendon autografts were harvested through proximal approach and used in four adolescent patients. A four-strand autograft was prepared in a double-limbed configuration and fixed on the patella and the femur with suture anchors and interference screws, respectively. The mean Kujala score improved significantly from 44 ± 24 SD (range, 19 to 69) points preoperatively to 94 ± 10 SD (range, 78 to 100) points postoperatively (P< 0.001). All patients reported excellent subjective outcomes and returned to their pre-injury level of sporting activities. The use of a four-strand plantaris tendon autograft in isolated anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction can restore patellar stability in adolescents.

Severe inwardly pointing knee after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a case report.

We report the case of a 26-year-old woman who presented with a profound gait disturbance and total disability following a medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. It is common knowledge that patellar instability is associated with multiple risk factors, including but not limited to loss of the MPFL, trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, an abnormally placed tibial tuberosity on the tibia, quadriceps contracture, genu valgum, excess of femoral anteversion, excess of external tibial torsion, and foot pronation. Since the relative importance of each is unknown, it is imperative that pre-operative evaluation considers these. Two additional surgeries failed to improve her severe disability. Subsequent evaluation, 8 years after her initial MPFL reconstruction, revealed the presence of an excess of external tibial torsion and genu valgum. Complete resolution of disability resulted following tibial osteotomy, suggesting the importance of torsional deformity contributing to patellofemoral instability. Gait disturbance is an unrecognised complication after MPFL reconstruction.

Decreased femoral trochlea axial orientation corrected by derotational distal femur osteotomy in patients with patellar dislocation yields satisfactory outcomes.

PURPOSE: The femoral trochlea axial orientation has been shown to be a better predictor of patellar dislocation than the femoral anteversion angle. However, no study has investigated the importance of the femoral trochlea axial orientation in the surgical treatment of patellar dislocation. It is aimed to explore the pathological threshold of the femoral trochlea axial orientation and its guiding implications for surgical interventions in the study. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with patellar dislocation and 64 controls were included for measurement of the femoral trochlea axial orientation. The ability to predict the patellar dislocation and the pathologic threshold of the femoral trochlea axial orientation were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve. One hundred patients with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and 25 patients with derotational distal femur osteotomy were divided into two groups based on the femoral trochlea axial orientation cut-off value and their postoperative knee functions, and patellar tilt angles were compared. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the femoral trochlea axial orientation (60.8 ± 7.9 vs. 67.8 ± 4.6, p < 0.05) between patients with patellar dislocation and the normal population. The sensitivity and specificity of the femoral trochlea axial orientation were 0.641 and 0.813, respectively, at the femoral trochlea axial orientation smaller than 63.8°. Amongst patients having had isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with decreased femoral trochlea axial orientation, knee function was poorer after surgery. The prognosis of patients with the femoral trochlea axial orientation correction in derotational distal femur osteotomy was better than that for patients without correction. CONCLUSIONS: The femoral trochlea axial orientation had good predictive efficiency for patellar dislocation. Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is not sufficiently effective for patients with patellar dislocation and decreased femoral trochlea axial orientation. Patients with a decreased femoral trochlea axial orientation can have better surgical outcomes after correction by derotational distal femur osteotomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The relationship between joint hypermobility and patellar instability: A systematic review.

Introduction: Hypermobility describes the movement of joints beyond normal limits. Whether hypermobility predisposes to patellar instability is yet to be established. We aimed to determine if joint hypermobility leads to an increased risk of patellar instability, and to evaluate outcomes of treatment for patellar instability in those who exhibit hypermobility. Methods: Published and unpublished literature databases were searched to September 7, 2023. Studies comparing prevalence of patellar dislocation/differences in treatment outcomes in patients with and without hypermobility were included. Results: We identified 18 eligible studies (4,391 patients). The evidence was low in quality. A case series on 82 patients found that there was a relationship between generalised joint laxity and patellar instability. This was corroborated by a study comparing 104 patients with patellar dislocation to 110 patients without. Prevalence of generalised joint laxity was six time higher in the former (64.4% vs 10.9%, p < 0.001).Five studies found surgical intervention aimed at correcting patellar dislocation in patients with idiopathic hypermobility led to satisfactory outcomes. There was conflicting evidence regarding if hypermobile patients have worse outcomes than non-hypermobile patients following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) in two studies. In addition, this procedure had a 19.1% failure rate in patients with Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (EDS), with hypermobility associated with a higher failure rate (p = 0.03). One study showed the type of graft used made no difference in outcome scores or re-dislocation rates (p > 0.5). Another study had 7/31 (22.6%) autografts which failed, compared to 2/16 allografts (12.5%) (p = 0.69). Conclusion: Joint hypermobility is a risk factor for patellar instability. Identification of at-risk groups may aid prevention of dislocations and allow for appropriate treatment. Patients with EDS experience poor outcomes following patellar stabilization surgery, with post-operative monitoring required.

Return to Sports Rates in Pediatric Patients After Bilateral Versus Unilateral Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral instability commonly occurs during sports activities. The return to sports (RTS) rate for pediatric patients after bilateral medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is unknown. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate RTS outcomes for pediatric patients undergoing bilateral MPFLR. It was hypothesized that (1) fewer pediatric patients would RTS after bilateral MPFLR compared with unilateral MPFLR and that (2) for those in the bilateral cohort who were able to RTS, fewer patients would attain the same level of play as or higher level than the preinjury level. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: We prospectively collected RTS data on retrospectively identified matched cohorts of patients aged ≤18 years who underwent unilateral and bilateral MPFLR. We matched each participant with bilateral MPFLR at a 1 to 2 ratio with a participant with unilateral MPFLR by concomitant procedure, age, and sex. Postoperative complications and preoperative imaging measurements were collected from medical records. Patient-reported outcomes were obtained using a current Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score collected at the time of primary outcome data. RESULTS: We matched 16 participants (mean age, 14 years) who underwent bilateral MPFLR to 32 participants (mean age, 14.3 years) in a corresponding unilateral MPFLR cohort. We found a significant decrease in RTS rates for pediatric patients after bilateral MPFLR when compared with unilateral MPFLR (69% vs 94%; P = .03). Among those who returned to sports, there was no difference in the level of play achieved. For participants who did not RTS or returned at a lower level of play after bilateral MPFLR, 57% cited fear of reinjury as the primary reason. There were no differences in postoperative complications or current Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores between cohorts. The bilateral cohort had a significantly higher Caton-Deschamps index compared with the unilateral cohort, although the absolute difference was small (1.3 vs 1.2; P = .005). CONCLUSION: We found that pediatric patients have a lower RTS rate after bilateral MPFLR when compared with a matched unilateral MPFLR cohort. No differences in the level of play were achieved among those who returned to sports. Fear of reinjury was a commonly cited reason for not returning to sports.

A Case Report on Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Rehabilitation in a Cricket Player Through Targeted Agility Training.

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) serves as a crucial stabilizer, preventing lateral dislocation of the patella. Surgery is usually advised after a second dislocation, with MPFL reconstruction being a common procedure. The primary objective of rehabilitation post-surgery is not just to relieve pain and restore range of motion (ROM), but also to combine proprioceptive neuromuscular training to help patients return to their prior functional level. Agility training is a crucial component in accomplishing this goal. The current case is of a 19-year-old male cricket player with a history of recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent surgery after the latest incident rendered him unable to bear weight. His rehabilitation program included standard protocols alongside the early implementation of agility drills, such as ladder exercises. Compared to traditional approaches, this case demonstrates significant improvement in the patient's functional ability following surgery. This report highlights the importance of comprehensive rehabilitation for patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction. It not only underscores the rationale behind the surgery but also lays the groundwork for comparing recovery times. Notably, this program incorporated early agility exercises from the very beginning, suggesting that such an approach might accelerate recovery compared to standard protocols. Further investigation is warranted to explore the potential benefits of early agility training in this patient population.

Derotational distal femur osteotomy with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction can get good outcomes in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation with excessive TT-TG and increased femoral anteversion.

Background: Surgery is the main treatment for recurrent patellar dislocation (PD). However, due to the complexity of anatomical factors, there is still a lack of consensus on the choice of combined surgical methods. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction combined with derotational distal femur osteotomies (MPFLR + DDFO) and combined with tibial tubercle osteotomies (MPFLR + TTO) for recurrent PD with increased femoral anteversion angles (FAA) and excessive tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, MPFLR + DDFO and MPFLR + TTO patients from 2015 to 2020 were included. Group A (MPFLR + DDFO, n = 42) and B (MPFLR + TTO, n = 46) were formed. Clinical outcomes included physical examinations, functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), visual analog scale (VAS) and intermittent and persistent osteoarthritis pain scale (ICOAP), Tegner scores), and complications. The Caton-Deschamps index (CD-I), patellar title angle, patellar congruence angle, patella-trochlear groove distance, TT-TG distance, and FAA were used to assess radiological outcomes. Results: All clinical outcomes improved significantly in both groups, but Group A had significantly better postoperative scores than Group B (Kujala: 89.8 ± 6.4 vs. 82.9 ± 7.4, P < 0.01; Lysholm: 90.9 ± 5.1 vs. 81.3 ± 6.3, P = 0.02; IKDC: 87.3 ± 9.0 vs. 82.7 ± 8.0, P < 0.01; Tegner: 6.0 (5.0, 9.0) vs. 5.0 (4.0, 8.0), P = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the VAS and ICOAP scores between the two groups. No dislocation recurrences occurred. Radiological outcomes improved significantly in both groups, but Group A had better outcomes. After surgery, the patellar height of 88.5% (23/26) patients in Group A and 82.8% (24/29) patients in Group B was restored to normal (the Caton-Deschamps index <1.2). Conclusions: Both MPFLR + TTO and MPFLR + DDFO obtained satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of recurrent PD with increased FAA and excessive TT-TG. However, the outcomes of MPFLR + DDFO were better and should be considered a priority. MPFLR + TTO may be not necessary for such patients.

Good short-term results following arthroscopic deepening trochleoplasty combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: surgical technique and outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report short-term results and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic deepening trochleoplasty combined with medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction utilizing standard arthroscopic instruments in patients of recurrent patellar dislocation and trochlear dysplasia. METHODS: This is a case series of 13 patients between the ages of 14 and 20 years who presented with recurrent patellar dislocation and severe trochlear dysplasia (Dejour grade D). They were treated surgically using an arthroscopic technique from February 2017 to January 2019 and were followed for 18 months. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively (at 6, 12, and 18 months) with clinical scores (Tegner Activity Score, Lysholm Knee Score, and Kujala Score). RESULTS: There were 69.2% females, and the mean age was 16.4 â€‹± â€‹2.0 years. There were statistically significant improvements in the mean Lysholm and Kujala scores when comparing pre-operative and post-operative scores at every follow-up landmark (p â€‹< â€‹0.05). Comparing the preoperative and 18-month postoperative scores-the Lysholm score improved from 68.2 â€‹± â€‹10.3 to 98.7 â€‹± â€‹2.1 (p â€‹< â€‹0.001), and the Kujala score improved from 50.3 â€‹± â€‹12.0 to 95.4 â€‹± â€‹4.8 (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Five patients were able to achieve premorbid Tegner activity levels at 12 months, with an additional 5 patients achieving the same premorbid Tegner activity at the 18-month mark. The remaining 3 patients were able to attain >90% of their activity level at 18 months' follow-up. No complications were observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This proposed arthroscopic deepening trochleoplasty technique combined with MPFL reconstruction has demonstrated excellent and reproducible early clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Combined ACL and MPFL Reconstruction Versus Isolated ACL Reconstruction for ACL Injury With Patellar Instability.

BACKGROUND: An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury accompanied by patellar instability (PI) is a topic that has gained orthopaedic surgeons' attention recently. Untreated PI is reportedly associated with worse clinical outcomes after isolated ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in patients after an ACL injury with PI. Nevertheless, the appropriate surgical approach and its long-term therapeutic effects in these patients remain unclear. PURPOSE: (1) To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes between isolated ACLR (iACLR) and combined ACLR and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (cAMR) in patients after an ACL injury with PI and (2) to explore the correlations between these 2 procedures and clinical and radiological outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 106 patients diagnosed with an ACL injury accompanied by PI between January 2016 and April 2021 were analyzed in this study. There were 34 patients excluded because of missing postoperative radiological data. Among the remaining 72 patients, 34 patients underwent iACLR, while 38 patients underwent cAMR. Demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, and patient-reported outcomes (Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, and Tegner activity score) were prospectively collected. Patellar alignment parameters and worsening patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) features (evaluated with the modified Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score) were analyzed longitudinally on magnetic resonance imaging. The Kujala score was used to evaluate the functional recovery of the patellofemoral joint, and redislocations of the patella were prospectively recorded. Finally, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the correlations between these 2 procedures and clinical (not achieving the minimal detectable change [MDC] for the Lysholm score) and radiological (worsening PFOA features) outcomes. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 28.9 ± 6.2 and 27.1 ± 6.8 months for the iACLR and cAMR groups, respectively (P = .231). Significantly higher Lysholm scores (88.3 ± 9.9 vs 82.1 ± 11.1, respectively; P = .016) and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores (83.6 ± 11.9 vs 78.3 ± 10.2, respectively; P = .046) were detected in the cAMR group compared with the iACLR group postoperatively. The rates of return to preinjury sports were 20.6% and 44.7% in the iACLR and cAMR groups, respectively (difference, 24.1% [95% CI, 3.3%-45.0%]; P = .030). Moreover, the rates of worsening PFOA features were 44.1% and 18.4% in the iACLR and cAMR groups, respectively (difference, 25.7% [95% CI, 4.9%-46.4%]; P = .018). In addition, significantly higher Kujala scores (87.9 ± 11.3 vs 80.1 ± 12.0, respectively; P = .006), lower redislocation rates (0.0% vs 11.8%, respectively; difference, 11.8% [95% CI, 0.9%-22.6%]; P = .045), and significantly better patellar alignment were detected in the cAMR group compared with the iACLR group postoperatively. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis determined that iACLR and partial lateral meniscectomy were significantly correlated with not achieving the MDC for the Lysholm score and worsening PFOA features in our study population. CONCLUSION: In patients after an ACL injury with PI, cAMR yielded better clinical and radiological outcomes compared with iACLR, with better patellar stability and a lower proportion of worsening PFOA features. Furthermore, not achieving the MDC for the Lysholm score and worsening PFOA features were significantly correlated with iACLR and partial lateral meniscectomy. Our study suggests that cAMR may be a more appropriate procedure for patients after an ACL injury with PI, which warrants further high-level clinical evidence.

Management of patellar instability in skeletally immature patients.

Surgical intervention is the treatment of choice for recurrent lateral patellar instability. Surgery should be considered for first time lateral patella dislocations with osteochondral fractures or underlying anatomical risk factors. Primary repair and nonanatomical imbrications/reconstructions have fallen out of favor due to abnormal biomechanics and high rates of recurrence. Anatomical reconstruction of the MPFL using a variety of auto and allograft tissues have yielded good outcomes and low redislocation rates. Physeal sparing MPFL reconstruction techniques under radiological control are safe and do not cause growth disturbance. Allografts may be indicated for hyperlax patients. Although no clear cutoff points exist, correction of valgus and excessive femoral anteversion should be considered when indicated. Osteochondral and chondral injuries are common and should be addressed during surgery for instability.

MPFL reconstruction with proximal rather than distal femoral tunnel position leads to less favorable short-term results.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction (MPFLR) between anatomic femoral tunnel positions: proximal (near adductor tubercle [AT]) and distal (near medial epicondyle [ME]). HYPOTHESIS: MPFLR with the proximal femoral tunnel position has worse clinical and radiological outcomes than those with the distal femoral tunnel position. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients who underwent isolated MPFLR with proximal or distal femoral tunnels with at least 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Based on postoperative CT images, 28 patients were classified as group AT and the remaining 27 patients were classified as group ME. The International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Tegner, Kujala scores, and complications were evaluated. Radiologically, the Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI), patellar tilt angle, patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA), patellofemoral cartilage status by the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade, bone contusion, and MPFL graft signal intensity were evaluated. RESULTS: All clinical scores significantly improved in both groups (p<0.01). No statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups in regards to their preoperative demographic data, postoperative clinical scores, complications, or radiological findings (CDI, patellar tilt angle, PFOA, bone contusion, and graft signal intensity). The group AT had worse cartilage status on the medial facet of the patella (p=0.02). The ICRS grade for the medial facet of the patella statistically progressed in group AT compared to group ME (p=0.04) as well. DISCUSSION: Both groups showed significantly improved clinical outcomes. However, for the medial facet of the patella, MPFLR with the proximal femoral tunnel position had worse cartilage status and ICRS grade progression than those with the distal femoral tunnel position. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; retrospective comparative study.

Measurement of TT-TG can change with sequential MRIs due to variations in tibiofemoral rotation in patellofemoral instability patients.

PURPOSE: There are various anatomic risk factors for patellofemoral instability (PFI) that help guide surgical treatment, including the tibial tubercle to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance. However, no study has analysed the temporal changes in TT-TG prior to surgical intervention. This study sought to understand the variations in TT-TG over time for pediatric patients suffering from PFI prior to surgical intervention. The authors hypothesised that the TT-TG would substantially change between time points. METHODS: Patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction between 2014 and 2019 by one of two fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons were identified. Patients were included if they had two preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed on the same knee within 7.5 months of each other prior to any surgical intervention and had an initial TT-TG greater than 10 mm. RESULTS: After considering 251 patients for inclusion, 21 patients met the final inclusion criteria. The mean age was 14.5 ± 2.5 years and 61.9% were female. TT-TG was initially noted to be 15.1 ± 1.8 mm. At mean time after sequential MRIs of 5.0 ± 1.9 months, TT-TG was noted to be 16.7 ± 3.2 mm. The differences between initial and subsequent TT-TG ranged from a 21.2% decrease to a 61.1% increase, with a mean difference of an 11.3% increase. Comparison between initial and subsequent TT-TG values demonstrated a significant difference (p = 0.017). Change in tibiofemoral rotation ranged from -9.2° to 7.5°. When comparing the change in TT-TG to change in tibiofemoral rotation, a significant correlation was found (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Despite only a mean time between MRIs of 5 months, variations in TT-TG ranged from a decrease of 21.2% to an increase of 61.1%. The significant relationship between the changes in TT-TG and changes in tibiofemoral rotation between MRIs suggest that TT-TG measurements may vary due to variations in tibiofemoral rotation at the time of individual MRIs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Derotational distal femoral osteotomy improves subjective function and patellar tracking after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in recurrent patellar dislocation patients with increased femoral anteversion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to systematically review and quantitatively analyse the clinical outcomes of combined derotational distal femoral osteotomy (D-DFO) and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) with increased femoral anteversion angle (FAA). METHODS: This study was performed in line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality Of Systematic Reviews) Guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes of combined D-DFO and MPFL-R in RPD patients with increased FAA. Data on patient-reported outcome measures, radiological parameters, patellar tracking as revealed by J-sign and complications were extracted based on the inclusion criteria. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Study score was used for quality assessment. Review Manager and R statistical software were used to perform the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Eleven studies with a total of 569 knees in 553 patients were included. Patients were predominantly female (79%). The weighted mean of FAA decreased from 33.6° to 13.0° (weighted mean difference = 20.59; p < 0.00001) after the combined procedure. Significant improvements (p < 0.00001) were identified in the Lysholm score (weighted mean: 55.5 vs. 80.4), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (weighted mean: 52.8 vs. 78.6) and Kujala score (weighted mean: 54.5 vs. 80.6). The incidence of residual J-sign ranged from 14.3% to 38.3% with an overall pooled rate of 28.2% (95% confidence interval = 22.8%-33.6%). The overall redislocation rate was 1.1%. No patients experienced surgical site infection or bone nonunion. Two studies compared the clinical outcomes of MPFL-R with and without D-DFO. Compared with isolated MPFL-R, the combined procedure yielded a better Lysholm score (weighted mean: 84.9 vs. 79.3, p < 0.0001), IKDC score (weighted mean: 84.1 vs. 79.9, p = 0.001), Kujala score (weighted mean: 84.3 vs. 79.4, p < 0.0001) and a lower residual J-sign rate (26/97 [26.8%] vs. 44/105 [41.9%], p = 0.02), respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of D-DFO and MPFL-R led to improved clinical outcomes and a low redislocation rate in patients with RPD and increased FAA. Additional D-DFO can achieve more favourable results in subjective function and patellar tracking than isolated MPFL-R in the setting of excessive FAA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Combination of tibial tubercle transfer, medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, trochleoplasty and lateral release for patellofemoral instability provides good middle- to long-term outcomes in adolescents.

PURPOSE: There are limited studies that have reported the middle- to long-term outcomes of combined procedures consisting of more than two procedures for patellofemoral instability. The current study aims to investigate and report the middle- to long-term outcomes of a combination procedure of tibial tubercle transfer, medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, trochleoplasty and lateral release for patellofemoral instability in patients aged 18 years and below. METHODS: In the cohort study, all patients aged 18 years old or younger who underwent a combination procedure of tibial tubercle transfer, medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, trochleoplasty and lateral release for recurrent patellofemoral instability were included. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were included in the study. All patients had no further patellofemoral dislocation, pain and apprehension following the 4-in-1 surgery (p < 0.01). There was a significant improvement in the Kujala score from 36.1 (SD 12.9) pre-operatively to 93.1 (SD 3.6) post-operatively (p < 0.001). The patients also had a statistically significant improvement in their radiological factors, including the patellar tilt angle (p < 0.001), sulcus angle (p = 0.001), trochlear groove depth (p = 0.041), tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (p < 0.001) and Caton-Deschamps index (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: A combination procedure of tibial tubercle transfer, medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, trochleoplasty and lateral release leads to good middle- to long-term subjective, functional and radiographic outcomes for patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability and underlying predisposing factors of increased TT-TG distance of more than 20 mm, Dejour B or D trochlear dysplasia and medial patellofemoral ligament rupture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.