Postoperative recovery in peroral versus intravenous antibiotic treatment following laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a substudy of a cluster randomized cluster crossover non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of abdominal pain requiring surgery, usually managed with laparoscopic appendectomy. In Denmark, the standard postoperative treatment for complicated cases involves intravenous antibiotics. This study compares peroral versus intravenous antibiotics in the context of fast-track surgery and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Our objective is to evaluate the impact of peroral versus intravenous antibiotics on patient-reported outcomes following laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. METHODS: This was a sub-study within a broader Danish cluster-randomized non-inferiority trial conducted at Zealand University Hospital, focusing on adult patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Participants were randomized into two groups: one receiving a three-day course of peroral antibiotics and the other intravenous antibiotics after surgery. Recovery quality was assessed on the third postoperative day using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. RESULTS: The study included 54 patients, 23 in the peroral and 31 in the intravenous groups. The peroral group reported significantly better recovery outcomes, with higher QoR-15 scores (mean difference of 12 points, p < 0.001). They also experienced shorter hospital stays, averaging 47 h less than the intravenous group (p < 0.001). No significant differences between the groups were observed in readmissions or severe postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Peroral antibiotic administration after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis significantly improves patient recovery and reduces hospital stay compared to intravenous antibiotics. These results advocate a potential shift towards peroral antibiotic use in postoperative care, aligning with ERAS principles. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04803422.

A comparison of efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus serratus anterior plane block plus subcostal transversus abdominus plane block for bariatric laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy surgery: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a rapidly growing global health concern. Limited long-term success of diet, behavioural modification and medical therapy have led to the increased performance of bariatric surgery. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, which permanently reduces the size of the stomach, has been shown to cause considerable weight loss, as well as improving or even eliminating obesity related medical comorbidities such as diabetes, obstructive sleep apnoea and hypertension. Unfortunately, this surgery can also result in significant postoperative pain which, when combined with the dangers of perioperative opioid administration for bariatric patients, can lead to a significantly reduced quality of recovery. Opioid-sparing analgesia has been widely recommended for perioperative bariatric patients, but research into the optimum regional analgesia approach for this surgery is lacking, with no trials to date comparing different regional analgesic techniques. This study protocol describes a randomised clinical trial aimed at answering this question, comparing the quality of recovery after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for patients who receive erector spinae plane block, versus those who receive serratus anterior plane block plus subcostal TAP block. METHODS: We propose a prospective, randomised, blinded (investigator) clinical trial in a tertiary hospital in Ireland. Seventy patients presenting for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will be randomised to two study groups-group A will receive bilateral erector spinae blockade; group B will receive left sided serratus anterior plane block plus subcostal TAP blocks. Both groups will receive the same dose of the same local anaesthetic and the different regional technique performed will be the only difference in their care. The primary outcome will be QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively, a validated international tool for assessing a patient's overall postoperative recovery. DISCUSSION: Regional analgesia should be a mainstay of perioperative opioid-sparing analgesia where possible. This is especially important in the bariatric cohort who are particularly susceptible to the complications of perioperative opioid administration. To the best of our knowledge, this trial will be the first to compare efficacy of two different regional analgesia techniques for bariatric patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was pre-registered on clinicaltrials.gov, registration number NCT05839704, on March 5, 2023. All items from the World Health Organisation Trial Registration Data Set have been included.

Assessment of intermediate phase post anesthesia quality of recovery and its affecting factors.

BACKGROUND: Recovery after surgery and anesthesia is dependent on patient, surgical, and anesthetic characteristics, as well as the presence of any of numerous adverse sequelae. Postoperative recovery is a complex and multidimensional process that requires a holistic view of the recovery of capacities and homeostasis after anesthesia and surgery. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of recovery after anesthesia and its affecting factors at Wachamo University Nigist Eleni Mohamed Memorial Comprehensive Hospital. METHOD: a prospective observational study was conducted at Wachamo University Nigist Eleni Mohamed Memorial Comprehensive Hospital among 384 surgical patients who undergone under anesthesia. Quality of recovery was assessed by using Quality of Recovery 40. Student t-test and one-way ANOVA were utilized to compare the mean of Quality of recovery in different groups. Binary regression was used to find out the factors affecting Quality of recovery quality of recovery. SPSS 27 was used for analysis. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULT: Sex and smoking history were the factors that we failed to find an association with poor quality of recovery. Preoperative antiemetic administration; premedication with benzodiazepines and emergency procedures were the factors that show potential relation with poor quality of recovery after anesthesia and surgery. Procedures performed under general anesthesia; Patients who had coexisting diseases; post-anesthesia incidence of nausea and vomiting; Visual Analog Scale score >/= 7 during discharge and prolonged duration of surgery were the factors that had a significant association with poor quality of recovery. CONCLUSION: The magnitude of good quality of recovery was 65.6% whereas 34.4% scored poor quality of recovery. The predictors for the prevalence of poor quality of recovery were found to be orthopedic procedures; procedures undergone under general anesthesia; incidence of post-anesthesia nausea and vomiting; prolonged length of the procedure and severity of pain.

Impact of intravenous steroids on subjective recovery quality after surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Quality of postoperative recovery is a crucial aspect of perioperative care. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intravenous steroids in improving the quality of recovery (QoR) after surgery, as measured by validated QoR scales. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: Operating room. INTERVENTION: The use of a single dose of intravenous steroids as a supplement to general anesthesia. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing surgery. MEASUREMENTS: A literature search was conducted using electronic databases (e.g., MEDLINE and Embase) from their inception to June 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intravenous steroids with placebo or no treatment in adult patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were included. The primary outcome was the QoR scores on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2-3, as assessed by validated QoR scales (QoR-15 and QoR-40). Secondary outcomes included QoR dimensions, analgesic rescue, pain scores, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). MAIN RESULTS: Eleven RCTs involving 951 patients were included in this study. The steroid group showed significant improvements in global QoR scores on POD 1 (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.52; 95 % confidence interval[CI]: 0.22 to 0.82; P = 0.0007) and POD 2-3 (SMD: 0.50; 95 % CI: 0.19 to 0.81; P = 0.001) compared to the control group. Significant improvements were also observed in all QoR dimensions on POD 1, with the effect sizes ranging from small to moderate. Intravenous steroids also significantly reduced the analgesic rescue requirements (RR: 0.77; 95 % CI: 0.67 to 0.88; P = 0.0003), postoperative pain scores (SMD: -0.41; 95 % CI: -0.68 to -0.14; P = 0.003), and PONV incidence (RR: 0.73; 95 % CI: 0.56 to 0.95; P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous administration of steroids significantly improved QoR after surgery. The benefits of steroids extend to all dimensions of QoR and important clinical outcomes such as analgesic requirements, pain scores, and PONV. These findings support the use of steroids as an effective strategy to enhance the postoperative recovery quality.

Cervical plexus block enhanced pain control for unilateral thermal ablation of thyroid nodules.

Background: Despite being minimally invasive, thermal ablation (TA) of thyroid nodules may still cause significant pain during and shortly afterwards. Conventional analgesia relies on perithyroidal local anesthesia (PLA) with or without sedation. The use of cervical plexus block (CPB) has been extensively studied in thyroidectomy, but never studied in TA of the thyroid gland. This study examined whether adding ultrasound-guided CPB to PLA and sedation could further reduce post-operative pain in unilateral TA of thyroid nodules. Methods: Consecutive patients aged ≥18 years undergoing unilateral radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) of thyroid nodules were reviewed. Group I patients did not receive CPB, and Group II patients received CPB by bupivacaine injection between the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) and prevertebral fascia on the treatment side. Pain was charted immediately and 4 hours after ablation using a numeric rating scale (NRS) of 0-10. The Quality-of-Recovery-9 (QoR9) questionnaire was completed. Results: Over an 18-month period, 100 patients underwent unilateral thyroid ablation (Group I, n=50; Group II, n=50). Comparable baseline patient demographics, nodule characteristics, ablation parameters were noted (P>0.05). Significantly lower immediate NRS {1 [0-3] vs. 4 [1.3-6], P<0.001}, 4-hour NRS {1 [0-3] vs. 2 [0-4], P=0.04}, and more zero immediate NRS (44% vs. 14%, P=0.001) was observed in Group II. Total QoR9 scores were comparable {16 [12-17] vs. 15 [12-17], P=0.72}. No adverse events occurred. All patients were discharged within the same day. Conclusions: Adding ultrasound-guided CPB further enhanced pain control following unilateral TA of thyroid nodules, without compromising quality of recovery or same-day discharge.

Oxycodone vs. sufentanil combined with quadratus lumborum block vs. transverse abdominis plane block in laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery: A randomized factorial trial protocol.

Background: Multimodal analgesia plays a key role in enhanced recovery after surgery. Herein, we describe a trial protocol investigating the effects of oxycodone-vs. sufentanil-based patient-controlled analgesia in combination with quadratus lumborum block (QLB) vs. transverse abdominis plane block (TAPB) on quality of recovery following major laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: and analysis: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. A total of 120 adult patients undergoing laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery will be randomized, in a 1:1:1:1 ratio, to receive one of two patient-controlled analgesia regimens (based on oxycodone or sufentanil) and one of two regional blocks (QLB or TAPB). The primary outcome measure of this trial is the quality of recovery at 24 h after surgery, assessed using the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale. The secondary outcomes include QoR-15 scores at 48 and 72 h after surgery; visceral and incisional pain at rest and while coughing at 1, 6, 24 and 48 h postoperatively; analgesic consumption within 0-24 h and 24-48 h postoperatively; need for rescue analgesia; postoperative flatus time; postoperative adverse events (sedation, nausea and vomiting, use of antiemetics, respiratory depression, and dizziness); and length of postoperative hospital stay. Discussion: The results of this trial will provide evidence for the optimal multimodal analgesic strategy to improve the quality of recovery for patients undergoing laparoscopic major gastrointestinal surgery. Trial registration: This trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR2400080766).

Recovery quality of transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine after cesarean delivery: A randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of liposomal bupivacaine in transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) on recovery quality after cesarean delivery. DESIGN: A randomized trial. SETTING: An operating room, a post-anesthesia care unit, and a hospital ward. PATIENTS: A total of 147 women scheduled for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia were enrolled and randomized to receive a TAP block with plain bupivacaine (bupivacaine group), liposomal bupivacaine (liposomal group), or a mixture of plain bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine (mixture group). INTERVENTIONS: The bupivacaine group received bilateral TAP blocks with plain bupivacaine 50 mg alone. The liposomal group received bilateral TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine 266 mg alone. The mixture group received bilateral TAP blocks with plain bupivacaine 50 mg followed by liposomal bupivacaine 266 mg. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR - 15) score assessed 24 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes encompassed the QoR - 15 score at 48 h post-surgery, the VAS pain score at rest and with movement at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively, opioid consumption within the 0-24 h and 24-48 h periods following surgery, as well as patient's satisfaction with analgesic. MAIN RESULTS: The QoR - 15 score at 24 h postoperatively was significantly higher in both the liposomal group and the mixture group compared to the bupivacaine group. Specifically, the QoR - 15 score for the liposomal group versus the bupivacaine group (median [IQR]: 120 [107, 128] vs. 109 [104, 120]; median difference, 7; 95 % CI, 2 to 13; P = 0.011) and for the mixture group versus the bupivacaine group (median [IQR]: 122 [112, 128] vs. 109 [104, 120]; median difference, 9; 95 % CI, 4 to 14; P = 0.001). The QoR - 15 score in both the liposomal group and the mixture group were also higher than those in the bupivacaine group at 48 h postoperatively, though the difference was not clinically meaningful. Additionally, both the liposomal and mixture groups exhibited lower pain score at 24 h and 48 h postoperatively compared to the bupivacaine group, but no significant clinical differences were achieved in either pain scores or opioid consumption. Patients in both the liposomal and mixture groups reported higher satisfaction score with analgesia than those in the bupivacaine group. CONCLUSIONS: TAP block using either liposomal bupivacaine or a mixture of plain bupivacaine and liposomal bupivacaine provided superior quality of recovery at 24 h after cesarean delivery compared to using plain bupivacaine alone.

Comparing subjective quality of recovery between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for surgical procedures: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that has been recently introduced as an alternative to propofol for general anesthesia. While both agents have been compared in terms of safety and efficacy, their relative effects on postoperative quality of recovery (QoR) remain unclear. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on subjective QoR in surgical patients who underwent general anesthesia. METHODS: Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to May 28, 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials comparing remimazolam and propofol in terms of postoperative QoR. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2) was used to assess study quality. QoR score on postoperative day (POD) 1 (primary outcome), QoR scores on PODs 2-3, QoR dimensions, time to loss of consciousness, other recovery characteristics, and rescue analgesia requirement were evaluated using random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 13 studies published between 2022 and 2024 involving 1,418 patients. QoR was evaluated using either the QoR-15 (10 studies) or QoR-40 (3 studies) questionnaire. The pooled results indicated no significant difference in the QoR scores on POD 1 (standardized mean difference: 0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: - 0.20, 0.23, P = 0.88, I2 = 73%) and PODs 2-3 between remimazolam and propofol. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in QoR dimensions, length of postanesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, and time to extubation as well as in the risks of agitation and postoperative nausea and vomiting. Patients administered remimazolam exhibited slower anesthetic induction (mean difference (MD): 32.27 s) but faster recovery of consciousness (MD: - 1.60 min) than those administered propofol. Moreover, remimazolam was associated with a lower risk of rescue analgesia requirement in the PACU (risk ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.89, P = 0.009, I2 = 0%) but not in the ward. CONCLUSION: Remimazolam is a potential alternative to propofol for general anesthesia as it offers similar QoR to the latter and has advantages in terms of consciousness recovery and immediate postoperative analgesia requirement.

Relative effects of serratus anterior plane block performed with dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine or ropivacaine alone on quality of recovery in children undergoing ear reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (Dex) as a local anesthesia adjuvant for nerve block procedures can improve the quality of patient recovery. However, the impact of using Dex as a local anesthetic adjuvant for serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) procedures on recovery quality for children undergoing ear reconstruction remains unclear. METHODS: Eighty-four patients who underwent ear reconstruction with autogenous costal cartilage (ACC) were randomized into two groups (n = 42/group) in which SAPB was performed with ropivacaine alone (R group) and with Dex and ropivacaine (DR group). Primary outcomes were patient 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale scores on days 1 and 2 post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative rest and coughing numerical rating scale (NRS) chest pain scores, duration of analgesia, oral rescue analgesic usage, and opioid-related side effects. RESULTS: Forty patients per group completed the study. QoR-15 scores on days 1 and 2 post-surgery in the DR group were significantly increased relative to the R group (126.35 ± 9.81 vs. 115.53 ± 8.58 and 131.78 ± 8.67 vs. 122.80 ± 8.59, all P < 0.001). Rest and coughing NRS chest pain scores at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h postoperatively in the DR group were all significantly lower relative to the R group (all P < 0.05). The DR group also exhibited significantly longer analgesic duration (P < 0.001) and significantly reduced incidences of oral rescue analgesic usage and opioid-related side effect (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combining Dex and ropivacaine for SAPB in children undergoing ear reconstruction with ACC can significantly improve the quality of recovery, quality of analgesia, and analgesic duration.

Comparison of the recovery quality between remimazolam and propofol after general anesthesia: systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: To evaluate the recovery quality between remimazolam and propofol after general anesthesia surgery. Methods: We included eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Central, Scopus, and Web of Science up to June 26, 2024 for comparison the recovery quality of remimazolam and propofol after general anaesthesia. The primary outcomes were the total Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) and five dimensions of QoR-15 on postoperative day 1 (POD1). Secondary outcomes were adverse events, the Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) on POD1, and the intraoperative and postoperative time characteristics. Results: Thirteen RCTs with a total of 1,305 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Our statistical analysis showed that remimazolam group had higher QoR-15 score on POD1, with no significant difference (Mean Difference (MD) = 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), [-1.67-4.15]; I2 = 75%; P = 0.41). In the five dimensions of QoR-15, remimazolam group was superior to propofol group in terms of physical independence (MD = 0.79; 95% CI [0.31-1.27]; I2 = 0%; P = 0.001). Remimazolam group was lower than propofol group in incidence of hypotension (Risk Ratio (RR) = 0.48; 95% CI [0.40-0.59]; I2 = 14%; P < 0.00001), bradycardia (RR = 0.18; 95% CI [0.08-0.38]; I2 = 0%; P < 0.0001) and injection pain (RR = 0.03; 95% CI [0.01-0.12]; I2 = 48%; P < 0.00001), respectively. The intraoperative and postoperative time characteristics and the QoR-40 were similar in the two groups. Conclusions: Our analysis showed that the recovery quality of the remimazolam group after general anaesthesia was similar to propofol group, while the incidence of adverse events was low in remimazolam group. As a potential anesthetic, remimazolam can be used in place of propofol for surgical general anesthesia.

The correlation between quality of recovery and parturient outcomes after Cesarean delivery: a cohort study.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have reported the use of the obstetric-specific quality of recovery tool (ObsQoR-10) to assess the quality of recovery in parturients after childbirth; however, the correlation between ObsQoR-10 scores and important postpartum outcomes are unclear. The primary aim of the present study was to investigate the correlations between ObsQoR-10 scores at 24 hr after Cesarean delivery and breastfeeding, depressive symptomatology, overall health, and pain at seven days postpartum. METHODS: We recruited parturients who underwent elective Cesarean delivery at KK Hospital in Singapore. Parturients provided responses to post-Cesarean questionnaires at 1) 24 hr (ObsQoR-10, EuroQol EQ-Visual Analogue Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), 2) 48 hr (ObsQoR-10, EQ-Visual Analogue Scale), and 3) seven days after Cesarean delivery (ObsQoR-10, Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short form, EQ-Visual Analogue Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, pain survey). RESULTS: We enrolled 222 participants, 200 (90%) of whom completed the seven-day follow-up between September 2022 and April 2023. There was limited correlation between ObsQoR-10 at 24 hr with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (r = 0.135), EQ-Visual Analogue Scale (r = 0.158), Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short form (r = 0.225), and averaged pain scores (r = -0.107) at seven days postpartum. ObsQoR-10 breastfeeding sub-score at 24 hr was weakly correlated with Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short form at seven days postpartum (r = 0.307). CONCLUSION: ObsQoR-10 at 24 hr postpartum had limited correlation with breastfeeding, depressive symptomatology, overall health, and pain at seven days. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04989894 ); first submitted 4 July 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Des études récentes ont rapporté l'utilisation de l'outil de qualité de récupération spécifique à l'obstétrique (ObsQoR-10) pour évaluer la qualité de la récupération chez les personnes parturientes après l'accouchement; cependant, la corrélation entre les scores sur l'outil ObsQoR-10 et les devenirs post-partum importants n'est pas claire. L'objectif principal de la présente étude était d'examiner les corrélations entre les scores ObsQoR-10 obtenus 24 heures après l'accouchement par césarienne et l'allaitement, la symptomatologie dépressive, l'état de santé général et la douleur sept jours après l'accouchement. MéTHODE: Nous avons recruté des personnes parturientes qui ont bénéficié d'un accouchement par césarienne programmée à l'Hôpital KK de Singapour. Les personnes parturientes ont répondu aux questionnaires post-césarienne à 1) 24 heures (ObsQoR-10, échelle visuelle analogique EuroQol EQ-Visual Analogue Scale, Échelle de dépression postnatale d'Édimbourg), 2) 48 heures (ObsQoR-10, EQ-Visual Analogue Scale), et 3) sept jours après la césarienne (ObsQoR-10, Échelle abrégée d'auto-efficacité de l'allaitement [Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short form], EQ-Visual Analogue Scale, Échelle de dépression postnatale d'Edimbourg, enquête sur la douleur). RéSULTATS: Nous avons recruté 222 participant·es, dont 200 (90 %) ont terminé le suivi de sept jours entre septembre 2022 et avril 2023. Il y avait une corrélation limitée entre l'ObsQoR-10 à 24 heures et l'Échelle de dépression postnatale d'Édimbourg (r = 0,135), l'échelle EQ-Visual Analogue Scale (r = 0,158), l'échelle d'auto-efficacité de l'allaitement maternel forme courte (r = 0,225) et les scores moyens de douleur (r = -0,107) sept jours après l'accouchement. Le sous-score d'allaitement ObsQoR-10 à 24 heures était faiblement corrélé à l'échelle d'auto-efficacité de l'allaitement maternel à sept jours après l'accouchement (r = 0,307). CONCLUSION: L'ObsQoR-10 à 24 heures après l'accouchement avait une corrélation limitée avec l'allaitement, la symptomatologie dépressive, l'état de santé général et la douleur à sept jours. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT04989894 ); première soumission le 4 juillet 2021.

Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol in combination with remifentanil on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of sevoflurane + remifentanil (Sev + Rem) and propofol + remifentanil (Pro + Rem) on the postoperative recovery quality of patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery to determine which anesthesia regimen provides a better overall recovery experience. Methods: Sixty patients were divided into two groups based on the treatments they underwent: Sev + Rem (n = 30) and Pro + Rem (n = 30). The Sev + Rem group received sevoflurane inhalation (0.5%, increasing to 0.5-4%) and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion. The Pro + Rem group received propofol [4-8 mg/(kg·h)] and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion. Anesthesia depth was maintained at a bispectral index of 40-60 in both groups. Perioperative data, hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative recovery quality were assessed. Results: Compared to the Pro + Rem group, the dose of remifentanil in the Sev + Rem group was significantly lower (1693.67 ± 331.75 vs. 2,959 ± 359.77, p < 0.001), the proportion of patients used norepinephrine was markedly higher [16 (53.33) vs. 8 (26.67), p = 0.035], and the time of extubation was earlier (356.33 ± 63.17 vs. 400.3 ± 50.11, p = 0.004). The Hemodynamic results showed the HR in the Sev + Rem group was faster than that in the Pro + Rem group at the beginning of surgery and 1 h post-surgery (67.37 ± 4.40 vs. 64.33 ± 4.44, p = 0.010, 69.07 ± 4.23 vs. 66.40 ± 5.03, p = 0.030). In regard to the assessment of postoperative recovery quality, the emotional state scores in the Sev + Rem group were significantly lower than the Pro + Rem group (36.83 ± 2.79 vs. 39.50 ± 4.64, p = 0.009). Conclusion: The two anesthesia modalities (Sev + Rem and Pro + Rem) have their advantages and disadvantages for patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery and have comparable effects on postoperative recovery quality.

The efficacy of lumbar erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia management in patients undergoing lumbar unilateral bi-portal endoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and reliability of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in posterior open lumbar spine surgery has been demonstrated; however, few randomized controlled trials of lumbar ESPB (L-ESPB) in lumbar unilateral bi-portal endoscopic (UBE) surgery have been reported. METHODS: A total of 120 patients, aged 18 to 65 (who underwent elective lumbar UBE surgery under general anesthesia and exhibited an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of I to III) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the ESPB group and the Control group. Ultrasound(US)-guided unilateral single-shot 0.25% ropivacaine L-ESPB was performed in the ESPB group, but not in the control group. Postoperative analgesic strategy for all patients: patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA, diluted and dosed with fentanyl alone) was initiated immediately after surgery combined with oral compound codeine phosphate and ibuprofen sustained release tablets (1 tablet containing ibuprofen 200 mg and codeine 13 mg, 1 tablet/q12h) commenced 6 h postoperatively. We collected and compared patient-centred correlates intraoperatively and 48 h postoperatively. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores. RESULTS: Compared to the control group (n = 56), the ESPB group (n = 58) significantly reduced intraoperative remifentanil consumption (estimated median difference - 280 mcg, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 360 to - 200, p < 0.001, power = 100%); significantly reduced fentanyl consumption at 24 h postoperatively (estimated median difference - 80mcg, 95%[CI] - 128 to - 32, p = 0.001, power = 90%); and significantly enhanced the QoR-15 score at 24 h postoperatively (estimated median difference 11, 95%[CI] 8 to 14, p < 0.001, power = 100%). Compared to the control group, the ESPB group enhanced the resting numeric rating scale (NRS) score up to 8 h postoperatively, and the active movement NRS score up to 4 h postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) (p = 0.015, power = 70%), abdominal distension (p = 0.024, power = 64%), and muscular calf vein thrombosis (MCVT) (p = 0.033, power = 58%) was lower in the ESPB group than in the control group. Moreover, the occurrence of L-ESPB related adverse reactions was not found herein. CONCLUSION: US-guided L-ESPB reduces intraoperative and 24 h postoperative opioid consumption and improves patients' QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively. L-ESPB can be safely and effectively utilized in lumbar UBE surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2200061908 , date of registration: 10/07/2022. Registry URL.

Defining the optimal local anaesthetic infusion regimen for erector spinae plane block catheters: the devil is in the details.

Ni Eochagain and colleagues report that programmed intermittent bolus and continuous infusion regimens in continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) block catheters produced similar quality of recovery (QoR-15) scores, pain scores, and use of rescue opioids after video-assisted thoracic surgery. This is a reassuring finding for practitioners without access to pumps with programmed intermittent bolus functionality. Nevertheless, it remains plausible that the benefit of one regimen over another might vary depending on the specific infusion parameters. There continues to be scope for research into optimising programmed intermittent bolus delivery and dosing regimens and identifying the most appropriate clinical applications for this mode of infusion.

Quality of recovery and maternal satisfaction after caesarean delivery: a mixed-methods prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction and quality of recovery (QoR) are important patient-reported outcomes and quality metrics. The relationship between these two outcomes is complex, with studies showing a weak correlation between them in the non-obstetric population. We sought to evaluate the correlation between patient satisfaction and QoR scores in the obstetric population after caesarean delivery. As secondary aims, we aimed to determine the influence of urgency of procedure and mode of anaesthetic on patient satisfaction and QoR scores as well as determining drivers of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. METHODS: Women were invited to complete the Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section (MSCS) and Obstetric Quality of Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) questionnaires at 24 h after caesarean delivery. Correlations were analysed using Spearman's rank tests. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Data were collected from 300 women. There was a significant but weak positive correlation between ObsQoR-11 and MSCS scores (r = 0.31, P < 0.001). Correlation was significantly influenced by mode of anaesthesia (P < 0.001) and urgency of procedure (P = 0.005), with greater satisfaction amongst patients receiving spinal anaesthesia and those undergoing scheduled caesarean deliveries for a given QoR score. Quality of communication, interactions with staff and aspects of the postpartum physical environment were significant determinants of satisfaction and dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: Maternal satisfaction and obstetric QoR are distinct entities with a weak correlation between the two variables. Urgency of procedure and mode of anaesthesia are significant predictors of the correlation between satisfaction and quality of recovery scores. Many of the drivers of satisfaction were modifiable including quality of communication and a comfortable physical space for postpartum recovery.

Influence of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Infusion on the Subjective Postoperative Quality of Recovery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

This meta-analysis investigated the effects of intravenous magnesium sulfate on the postoperative recovery quality, as assessed using the Quality of Recovery (QoR) questionnaire, in adult surgical patients. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 622 patients were included. Compared with the placebo, magnesium sulfate significantly improved the global QoR score on postoperative day 1 (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.78; p < 0.00001). It also enhanced specific QoR dimensions, with substantial effects on pain (SMD: 1, p < 0.00001) and physical comfort (SMD: 0.85, p < 0.0001), a moderate effect on emotional state (SMD: 0.65, p = 0.002), and small improvements in physical independence (SMD: 0.43, p < 0.00001) and psychological support (SMD: 0.37, p < 0.0001). In addition, magnesium sulfate reduced the intraoperative opioid consumption (SMD: -0.66, p < 0.0001), postoperative pain severity, and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (risk ratio: 0.48, p = 0.008). The extubation times were unaffected, whereas the post-anesthesia care unit stay was slightly prolonged. These findings highlight the potential of magnesium sulfate as a valuable adjunct for multimodal analgesia and enhanced recovery. Future studies should aim to elucidate the optimal dosing strategies, timing of administration, and specific surgical populations that may derive maximum benefits.

Impact of non-emergency surgical timing on postoperative recovery quality in mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients: a grouped cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between the timing of non-emergency surgery in mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infected individuals and the quality of postoperative recovery from the time of confirmed infection to the day of surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 300 cases of mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients undergoing elective general anaesthesia surgery at Yijishan Hospital between January 9, 2023, and February 17, 2023. Based on the time from confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection to the day of surgery, patients were divided into four groups: ≤2 weeks (Group A), 2-4 weeks (Group B), 4-6 weeks (Group C), and 6-8 weeks (Group D). The primary outcome measures included the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale scores at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative mortality, ICU admission, pulmonary complications, postoperative length of hospital stay, extubation time, and time to leave the PACU. RESULTS: Concerning the primary outcome measures, the QoR-15 scores at 3 days postoperatively in Group A were significantly lower compared to the other three groups (P < 0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences among the other three groups (P > 0.05). The QoR-15 scores at 3 and 6 months postoperatively showed no statistically significant differences among the four groups (P > 0.05). In terms of secondary outcome measures, Group A had a significantly prolonged hospital stay compared to the other three groups (P < 0.05), while other outcome measures showed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The timing of surgery in mild or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected patients does not affect long-term recovery quality but does impact short-term recovery quality, especially for elective general anaesthesia surgeries within 2 weeks of confirmed infection. Therefore, it is recommended to wait for a surgical timing of at least greater than 2 weeks to improve short-term recovery quality and enhance patient prognosis.

Systemic lidocaine versus erector spinae plane block for improving quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare intravenous lidocaine, ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and placebo on the quality of recovery and analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. DESIGN: A prospective, triple-arm, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial. SETTING: A single tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: 126 adults aged 18-65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: intravenous lidocaine infusion (1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by 2 mg/kg/h) plus bilateral ESPB with saline (25 mL per side); bilateral ESPB with 0.25% ropivacaine (25 ml per side) plus placebo infusion; or bilateral ESPB with saline (25 ml per side) plus placebo infusion. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the 24-h postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. The non-inferiority of lidocaine versus ESPB was assessed with a margin of -6 points and 97.5% confidence interval (CI). Secondary outcomes included 24-h area under the curve (AUC) for pain scores, morphine consumption, and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: 124 patients completed the study. Median (IQR) 24-h QoR-15 scores were 123 (117-127) for lidocaine, 124 (119-126) for ESPB, and 112 (108-117) for placebo. Lidocaine was non-inferior to ESPB (median difference  -1, 97.5% CI: -4 to ∞). Both lidocaine (median difference 9, 95% CI: 6-12, P < 0.001) and ESPB (median difference 10, 95% CI: 7-13, P < 0.001) were superior to placebo. AUC for pain scores and morphine use were lower with lidocaine and ESPB versus placebo (P < 0.001 for all), with no significant differences between lidocaine and ESPB. One ESPB patient reported a transient metallic taste; no other block-related complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intravenous lidocaine provides a non-inferior quality of recovery compared to ESPB without requiring specialized regional anesthesia procedures. Lidocaine may offer a practical and accessible alternative within multimodal analgesia pathways.

Effect of Rectus Sheath Block on Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Transabdominal Midline Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Introduction: Rectus sheath block is an emerging technique that provide effective perioperative analgesia and is related to lower perioperative opioid consumption and decrease opioid-related adverse effects. The present research is designed to explore the effect of rectus sheath block on recovery quality in patients following transabdominal midline gynecological surgery. Methods: Ninety female patients following elective transabdominal midline gynecological surgery were enrolled. Patients were randomized to group R (n = 45) which receive preoperative ultrasound-guided RSB with 0.4% ropivacaine or group C which is control group (n = 45). The primary outcome was the quality of recovery on the first postoperative day. The quality of recovery was assessed by the 40-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire (QoR-40). Secondary outcomes included the intraoperative opioid consumption, time to first flatus and time to first discharging from bed, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction. Results: The patients in two groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Postoperative global QoR-40 scores were significantly better in group R than in group C (165.0[159.5-170.0] vs 155.0[150.0-157.0], respectively; median difference 12[95% confidence interval: 8-15, P<0.001]). Preoperative RSB reduced intraoperative opioid consumption, reduced the time to first flatus, time to first discharging from bed and the post anaesthesia care unit discharge time. Furthermore, group R showed greater patient satisfaction. Conclusion: A single preoperative administration of RSB with ropivacaine improved the quality of recovery in patients following transabdominal midline gynecological surgery.

Although laparoscopic surgery accounts for a higher proportion of gynecological procedures, open gynecological surgery remains irreplaceable for some patients. Recovery from open gynecological surgery is a combination of physical injuries and psychological challenges. Consequently, accelerating functional recovery, alleviating discomfort and improving the quality of recovery in such patients is a clinical issue that we need to focus on. The QoR 40 scale is a patient-reported assessment tool which evaluates the quality of recovery in five dimensions. Ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block is a safe and effective abdominal wall nerve block for anesthesia and analgesia of umbilical and median abdominal longitudinal incisions. This study investigated the impact of rectus sheath block on the quality of postoperative recovery after open gynecological surgery using the QoR40 scale. Participants were randomized to two groups: rectus sheath block treatments and a control group receiving standard care only. Rectus sheath block improves the quality of recovery in patients undergoing open gynecological surgery one day after surgery without adverse effects, which has successfully made rapid rehabilitation from bench to bedside.

The effect of pre-emptive oral pregabalin on opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with an analysis of intraoperative hemodynamic stability and quality of recovery: study protocol for a randomized, prospective, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are particularly at risk of opioid-related side effects. To reduce patient exposure to opioids, multimodal analgesia, which involves the use of drugs of different classes, may be utilized. One of the drugs under consideration is pregabalin. Despite an opioid-sparing potential, few studies assess the role of pregabalin as an element of multimodal analgesia in LSG. Considering the limited number and inconsistent results of available studies, we decided to conduct a randomized, prospective study on the effect of preemptive pregabalin administration in obese patients on opioid consumption, pain scores, the incidence of opioid side effects, and hemodynamical stability. METHODS: The study is designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial with double-blinding. Randomization will be performed in a block with a parallel 1:1 allocation. The intervention will involve receiving a pregabalin 150 mg capsule 1-2 h before the surgery, whereas the control group will receive an identically looking placebo. The primary outcome measure will be total oxycodone consumption in the first 24 h following surgery. Secondary outcome measures will be pain severity assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, postoperative sedation on the Ramsay scale, PONV impact scale, the incidence of desaturation episodes < 94%, and episodes of blurred vision at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), total fluid volume, and total ephedrine dose. Patient comfort will be additionally assessed using the QoR-40 questionnaire at discharge. DISCUSSION: The study will explore the efficacy and safety of preemptive pregabalin in a dose of 150 mg as a co-analgesic used in multimodal analgesia for LSG. As studies on opioid-sparing regimes concern the safety of obese patients, we aim to contribute objective data with a relatively large study sample size. The result of the present clinical trial may support the reassessment of recommendations to use pregabalin in the studied population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05804591. Registered on 07.04.2023.