Variability in Kidney Cancer Treatment and Survival in England: Results of a National Cohort Study.

AIMS: To establish whether there are geographic differences in treatments and outcomes for patients with kidney cancer (KC) in England which could potentially be improved by the creation of national guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary group convened by the charity Kidney Cancer UK developed Quality Performance Indicators (QPIs) for the treatment of KC. Adherence to these QPIs was reported for all patients with a histological diagnosis of KC diagnosed in England between 2017 and 2018. Utilising data extracted from national datasets, logistic and linear probability models were used to estimate geographic variation in the delivery of surgery and systemic anti-cancer therapy at Cancer Alliance and NHS trust levels. Results were adjusted for a priori confounders, including age at diagnosis, area deprivation of residence, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Differences in overall survival are reported. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 18,640 tumours in 18,421 patients. Of tumours diagnosed, median patient age was 68 (interquartile range 58-77) years and 63.4% were in males. When stratified by Cancer Alliance, the proportions of T1a/T1b/N0/M0 KC that had radical nephrectomy (RN), nephron sparing surgery or ablation ranged from 53.3% (95% CI [48.7, 57.8]) to 80.3% (95% CI [73.0, 86.0]). For stage T1b-3 cancers, the proportion that received RN ranged from 65.6% (95% CI [60.3, 70.5]) to 77.3% (95% CI [72.1, 81.7]). Patients with M0 (n = 12,365) and M1 KC (n = 3312) at diagnosis had 24-month survival of 87.5% and 25.1%, respectively. Of patients diagnosed with M1 KC, 50.3% received systemic anti-cancer therapy, ranging from 39.7% (95% CI [33.7, 46.1]) to 70.7% (95% CI [59.6, 79.8]) between Cancer Alliances. The six-month survival of these patients was 77.4% compared to 27.6% for those that did not receive SACT. CONCLUSION: These major geographical differences in surgical and systemic therapy practice have led to national guideline development.

Achieving a textbook outcome in patients undergoing gastric resections in a low incidence, high-volume Australian Upper GI unit.

BACKGROUND: Textbook outcome (TBO) has been proposed as a composite measure of quality in esophagogastric surgery, and achieving a TBO has been associated with improved overall survival (OS). The Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit group determined their TBO rate for gastrectomy to be 32.1%, using 10 parameters. Our study aimed to assess the TBO rate in patients who had a gastrectomy for cancer in an Australian Upper GI unit, allowing for comparisons with international specialist centers. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who had a gastrectomy for cancer performed by the surgeons in a single Australian center between 2013 and 2018. Postoperative complications were analyzed using Clavien-Dindo (CD) ≥2 and CD ≥3 definitions. Baseline factors and their association with TBO were analyzed using multivariable logistical regression. The association between TBO and survival rates was determined by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS: In 136 patients, 84 (62%) achieved a TBO when complications were graded as CD ≥2. Greatest negative impact on TBO was the complication rate, lymph node yield, and length of stay. Patients more likely to achieve a TBO were younger, with an increased body mass index and absence of underlying respiratory disease. A nonsignificant trend toward improved OS was seen when TBO was achieved. CONCLUSION: Our TBO rate compares favorably with published data from high-volume centers. Assessment of a unit's TBO may provide a stronger evaluation of quality when assessing where complex surgery should be performed within Australia.

The influence of postoperative outcomes on survival after esophageal cancer surgery: validation of a consensus-based updated textbook outcome parameter.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy in combination with perioperative multimodal therapy is the cornerstone of modern curative treatment for esophageal adenocarcinoma. The primary aim of this study was to assess the influence of textbook outcome (TO) as a composite quality performance indicator (QPI) and its perioperative parameters on survival in patients who underwent esophagectomy with curative intent. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent an esophagectomy between January 2014 and December 2022 at Christchurch Hospital were identified from a prospectively maintained hospital database. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess prognostic factors for each composite and individual postoperative outcome. Survival analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of these outcomes on overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients underwent an esophagectomy during the study period. The overall and Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ 3 postoperative complication rates were 62% and 26%, respectively. The anastomotic leak rate was 6.5% (n = 7). The TO rate, 30-day readmission rate, and 30-day mortality rate were 20%, 13%, and 1%, respectively. Resection margin and nodal disease were found to be independent prognostic factors for reduced survival. CONCLUSION: TO as originally defined and its postoperative parameters of 30-day postoperative complications and 30-day readmission are validated QPIs of esophageal cancer surgery. Updating the postoperative complication parameter to include CD grade ≥ 3 complications resulted in a positive association between achieving TO and increased survival. Our findings support the call to redefine TO based on an update to this parameter, making it a more precise QPI of esophageal cancer surgery.

Quality Measures for Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards and Their Role in Improving Cancer Care.

While multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) are widely used in managing patients with cancer, their impact on patient care and outcome is not routinely measured in different settings. The authors conducted a literature review in Medline, Google Scholar, Embase, and Web of Science using the following keywords: cancer, multidisciplinary, tumor board, quality performance indicator, lung cancer, and lymphoma. Standards from various accreditation and professional organizations were reviewed to compile relevant standards for MTB. A list of quality performance indicators that can be used to improve MTBs' performance and impact was compiled. Specific examples for non-Hodgkin lymphoma and lung cancer MTBs were presented. Guidance was provided to help MTB team members select implement the appropriate quality measures. The functions and impact of MTBs should be monitored and evaluated by a set of measures that help guide MTBs to improve their performance and provide better care to their patients.

Textbook outcomes for oesophagectomy: A valid composite measure assessment tool for surgical performance in a specialist unit.

INTRODUCTION: In 2017 the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit Group proposed a ten-item composite measure for a 'textbook outcome' (TBO) following oesophago-gastric resection. Studies have shown associations between TBO and improved conditional and overall survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of TBO to assess the outcomes from a single specialist unit in a country, with low incidence of disease, allowing comparisons with international specialist centres. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected oesophageal cancer surgery data at a single centre, in Australia, between 2013 and 2018. Multivariable logistical regression assessed association between baseline factors and TBO. Post-operative complications were analysed in two separate groups as Clavien-Dindo ≥2 (CD ≥ 2) and Clavien-Dindo ≥3 (CD ≥ 3). Cox-proportional hazards regression analysis determined the association between TBO and survival. RESULTS: 246 patients were analysed, with 50.8% (n = 125) achieving a TBO when complications were defined as CD ≥ 2 and 58.9% (n = 145) when using CD ≥ 3. Patients aged ≥75, and those with a pre-operative respiratory co-morbidity were less likely to achieve a TBO. Overall survival was not influenced by TBO when complications were defined as CD ≥ 2, however it was higher when a TBO was achieved, and complications were defined as CD ≥ 3 (HR 0.54, 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: TBO is a multi-parameter metric that allowed benchmarking of the quality of oesophageal cancer surgery in our unit, providing favourable outcomes compared with other published data. There was an association between TBO and improved overall survival when the definition of severe complications was CD ≥ 3.

Quality performance indicator compliance for the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Quality performance indicators (QPI) are objective measurements of aspects of patient care that affect clinical outcome. This study investigates the compliance rate to published QPIs of gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) management, in a single institution, to determine areas of strong performance and those requiring improvement. METHODS: All patients with GA treated from 2010 to 2015, and 2020 to 2021 were included. Electronic data in the form of clinic letters, operation notes, and histology and radiology reports were reviewed with ethics approval. QPI adherence was collected in binary form. RESULTS: QPIs with high compliance rate include preoperative radiological staging and histological diagnosis, subspecialty surgeon training and pathology report documentation. QPIs with low compliance include perioperative chemotherapy (31.6%), postoperative radiological surveillance (32.5%) and minimally invasive approaches to surgical resection (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: QPIs from the systematic review are variably implemented in clinical practice, thus informing on their relevance to real world clinical practice whilst also identifying the areas requiring focus for improvement.

British Gynaecological Cancer Society Recommendations for Evidence Based, Population Data Derived Quality Performance Indicators for Ovarian Cancer.

Ovarian cancer survival in the UK lags behind comparable countries. Results from the ongoing National Ovarian Cancer Audit feasibility pilot (OCAFP) show that approximately 1 in 4 women with advanced ovarian cancer (Stage 2, 3, 4 and unstaged cancer) do not receive any anticancer treatment and only 51% in England receive international standard of care treatment, i.e., the combination of surgery and chemotherapy. The audit has also demonstrated wide variation in the percentage of women receiving anticancer treatment for advanced ovarian cancer, be it surgery or chemotherapy across the 19 geographical regions for organisation of cancer delivery (Cancer Alliances). Receipt of treatment also correlates with survival: 5 year Cancer survival varies from 28.6% to 49.6% across England. Here, we take a systems wide approach encompassing both diagnostic pathways and cancer treatment, derived from the whole cohort of women with ovarian cancer to set out recommendations and quality performance indicators (QPI). A multidisciplinary panel established by the British Gynaecological Cancer Society carefully identified QPI against criteria: metrics selected were those easily evaluable nationally using routinely available data and where there was a clear evidence base to support interventions. These QPI will be valuable to other taxpayer funded systems with national data collection mechanisms and are to our knowledge the only population level data derived standards in ovarian cancer. We also identify interventions for Best practice and Research recommendations.

Overcoming the Chasm Between Evidence and Routine Practice for Bladder Cancer; Just a Quixotic Notion?

There has been a failure to improve outcomes in bladder cancer over the last 30 years. This is despite clinical trial evidence showing a benefit of interventions such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy or concurrent radiosensitisation for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The bladder cancer population is characteristically elderly, who typically suffer from multiple comorbidities. Historically, radical cystectomy has been heralded as the treatment of choice, with radiotherapy being reserved for those with inoperable tumours or those unfit for major pelvic surgery, despite a lack of robust comparative or quality of life data to support one treatment recommendation over the other. Although patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer have potentially curable disease, a growing body of population-based analyses persistently highlights that most patients do not undergo curative-intent treatments - a trend that remains static. The causes for the disparity between evidence and routine practice is not clearly understood. Here, the facets of patient-centred evidence-based care, with respect to bladder conservation therapy, are examined, with proposals to reverse this unacceptable status quo.

Consensus-Derived Quality Performance Indicators for Neuroendocrine Tumour Care.

Quality performance indicators (QPIs) are used to monitor the delivery of cancer care. Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are a family of individually uncommon cancers that derive from neuroendocrine cells or their precursors, and can occur in most organs. There are currently no QPIs available for NETs and their heterogeneity makes QPI development difficult. CommNETs is a collaboration between NET clinicians, researchers and advocates in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. We created QPIs for NETs using a three-step consensus process. First, a multidisciplinary team used the nominal group technique to create candidates (n = 133) which were then curated into appropriateness statements (62 statements, 44 sub-statements). A two-stage modified RAND/UCLA Delphi consensus process was conducted: an online survey rated the statement appropriateness then the top-ranked statements (n = 20) were assessed in a face-to-face meeting. Finally, 10 QPIs met consensus criteria; documentation of primary site, proliferative index, differentiation, tumour board review, use of a structured pathology report, presence of distant metastasis, 5- and 10-year disease-free and overall survival. These NET QPIs will be trialed as a method to monitor and improve care for people with NETs and to facilitate international comparison.