Clinical Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Visualized Foraminoplasty and Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Bilateral Radiculopathy.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) with bilateral radiculopathy using transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) remains challenging, especially at the L5/S1 level with narrow foramen or high iliac crest. Full-endoscopic visualized foraminoplasty and discectomy (FEVFD) is a newly developed technique for LDH and lumbar stenosis. However, there is limited evidence on the efficacy of FEVFD technique in the treatment of LDH with bilateral radiculopathy. This study was to assess the clinical outcomes and safety of using FEVFD in the treatment of LDH with bilateral radiculopathy. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 63 patients with LDH presenting with bilateral radiculopathy between January 2018 and January 2022. Patients enrolled before January 2020 were treated using a conventional transforaminal endoscopic surgical system (TESSYS) technique (TESSYS, n = 33) and treated using a FEVFD technique after that (FEVFD, n = 30). The total operation time and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies were recorded. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively (at 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and final follow-ups). Global outcomes at final follow-up were assessed using modified MacNab criteria. RESULTS: Compared with TESSYS, patients in FEVFD group had a shorter operation time (92.9 vs. 78.0 min). The intraoperative fluoroscopies in FEVFD group were significantly lower than those in TESSYS group (18.7 vs. 4.9). After the operation, the VAS and ODI scores at all follow-ups in the two groups were significantly lower than those before operation. For the L5/S1 level, the values of VAS and ODI scores in FEVFD group were significantly lower than those of in TESSYS group at 3-month, 6-month, and final follow-up. For the L4/5 level, however, no significant difference was found in VAS and ODI scores between these two groups at the follow-ups. According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent-to-good rate in TESSYS and FEVFD groups was 84.8% and 90.0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: For LDH with bilateral radiculopathy, using the FEVFD technique could not only reduce the operation time and radiation, but also improve the clinical outcomes at the L5/S1 level.

High-Velocity Low-Amplitude Techniques for the Management of Discogenic Lumbosacral Radicular Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of high-velocity low-amplitude techniques (HVLATs) on discogenic lumbosacral radicular syndrome (LSRS). METHODS: This was a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and Web of Science (WoS) were searched from inception until 19 November 2023. Eligible RCTs involved adults with LSRS and compared HVLATs with other nonsurgical treatments, sham HVLATs or no intervention. Data related to pain, disability, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events were extracted. The methodological quality was assessed with the 'Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) Tool 2.0' and the certainty of the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Three of the 415 retrieved records met the inclusion criteria. One study investigated acute LSRS, comparing HVLAT versus sham HVLAT. The second study investigated subacute and chronic LSRS, comparing the same intervention with the intervention group receiving 3 adjunctive sessions of HVLAT. The third study investigated chronic LSRS, comparing HVLATs to another manual therapy technique. Totally, 186 people were involved (n = 95 intervention group; n = 91 control group). The first study reported greater improvement in pain and disability in favor of HVLATs. The second study found no differences in pain in favor of HVLATs. The third study found greater improvement for pain, disability and HRQoL in the control group. No adverse events were reported. Two studies were at high RoB and highly heterogeneous; 1 was considered of some concern. The certainty of the evidence was "very low." CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to conclude whether HVLATs can be helpful in LSRS. Future high-quality RCTs are necessary.

Comparison of Clinical Effects and Physical Examination of Transforaminal and Caudal Steroid Injection With Targeted Catheter in Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal and caudal epidural injections are two methods of steroid injection in lumbar radiculopathy. Using a targeted catheter with the possibility of accessing the involved spinal roots and steroid administration selectively next to them during the caudal procedure may achieve the benefits of both transforaminal and caudal procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical effects and physical examinations of transforaminal steroid injection compared to caudal through a targeted catheter in lumbar radiculopathy. METHODS: Fifty patients with lumbar radiculopathy candidates for epidural steroid injection were divided into transforaminal (T) and caudal (C) groups. Steroid injection under fluoroscopic guidance was performed in group T with the transforaminal method and in group C with the caudal method using a targeted catheter for each involved spinal nerve root. Pain intensity visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), daily analgesic consumption, and physical examinations on four follow-ups (before injection, second week, first and third month) were evaluated. RESULTS: Pain score (VAS) and functional disability index (ODI) were similar in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). The positive Lasègue test was significantly higher in the caudal group than in the transforaminal group only in the third month (p < 0.05). Other physical examinations in both groups did not have significant differences in all the follow-ups. Moreover, there was no difference in the amount of analgesic consumption in the two groups. No complications were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study showed that transforaminal and caudal steroid injection (with a targeted catheter) in patients with lumbar radiculopathy had similar effects in controlling pain and improving functional disability of patients in the short term. Cases of recurrence of positive Lasègue test in physical examinations in the long term (third month) in the caudal group may indicate the preference of the transforaminal approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) number: IRCT20111102007984N31.

Comparing the effectiveness of pregabalin and gabapentin in patients with lumbar radiculopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Gabapentinoids are commonly prescribed to control neuropathic pain of lumbar radiculopathy. Few trials have compared the efficacy of gabapentin (GBP) and pregabalin (PGB). Therefore, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to compare the difference in effect between GBP and PGB in lumbar radiculopathy patients. METHODS: Articles which were published between January 1, 1960 and May 31, 2023 were investigated via Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE. This meta-analysis was conducted on patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Gabapentin was used as an intervention, and pregabalin as a comparison. As outcomes, pain rating scales including visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric pain rating scale (NRS), and number of adverse events (dizziness and sedation) were obtained. RESULTS: PGB showed statistically significant improvement in pain scale (VAS and NRS) in short-term follow-up (6 weeks or less) compared to GBP. (Total mean difference of -0.31) However, in the long-term follow-up (6 weeks to 12 weeks), there was no difference in pain reduction effect between two groups. The incidence of AEs showed no difference between two groups. CONCLUSION: Based on this article, the existing evidence suggests that PGB was more effective in reducing pain of lumbar radiculopathy compared to GBP at the short-term follow-up, but there was no difference in the long-term follow-up. Physicians should consider this finding in prescribing medications for patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

Iatrogenic needle penetrating injury of cervical spinal cord: a case of fatal therapeutic complication.

A 52-year-old woman with of neck pain underwent percutaneous neck injection of local anesthetic and a corticosteroid without image guidance. She collapsed asystolic during the procedure was resuscitated and then died after 2 weeks in the intensive care unit with hypoxic encephalopathy. Complete postmortem examination included additional posterior neck dissection and cervical spinal cord removal with intact dura mater. The entire cervical spinal cord with the dura and leptomeninges was embedded in an oriented sequence of several paraffin blocks. Serial sections of each selected blocks were then studied to locate a putative puncture site. Serial sections from the third and fourth cervical levels (C3-C4) were stained with luxol fast blue-hematoxylin-eosin, iron stain, trichrome stain, and immunostained for b-amyloid precursor protein, and CD68. Histological examination revealed a linear needle track with a subacute healing reaction. The path included the dorsal spinal dura, arachnoid, and the left dorsal column. Clinicopathological correlation and the cause of death are discussed. Careful planning, dissection, sampling, and oriented serial sectioning with immunostaining were key points to document the injuries and understand this case.

Baseline Neck Disability Index and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Predict Postoperative Return to Normal in Cervical Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies assessing the importance of various preoperative factors on postoperative outcomes following spine surgery have uncovered several important variables that influence subjective and objective outcomes following cervical spine surgery, but it is still unclear which patients are most likely to benefit from operative management. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess whether preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be used to predict which patients achieve "normal" levels of pain and function after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: This study included all adult patients undergoing cervical spine surgery by 1 of 7 senior spine surgeons at our institution between 2016 and 2018. Of the 164 patients who were eligible for 6-month follow-up at the time that study data were collected, 139 had available follow-up data and were included in our analysis. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Patients completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI) as well as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference computer adaptive tests preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. METHODS: Patients who achieved postoperative patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) for NDI (≤17) and the normative mean (50) for PROMIS were identified. The relationship between preoperative PROMs and the probability of achieving PASS and the normative mean was assessed. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria with diagnoses of myelopathy (n = 36), radiculopathy (n = 48), and myeloradiculopathy (n = 49). For NDI, a 1-point worsening in the preoperative score resulted in an OR of achieving PASS of 0.96 (P < 0.001) in the overall population. This association held true for patients with radiculopathy (OR 0.96; P = 0.022) but not myelopathy (OR 0.98; P = 0.35). For PROMIS PF, a 1-point improvement in the preoperative score resulted in an OR of achieving the normative mean of 1.10 (P < 0.001). This association held true for patients with radiculopathy (OR 1.14; P = 0.033) but did not reach statistical significance for patients with myelopathy (OR 1.03; P = 0.515). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative PROMs can predict postoperative benefit for patients undergoing cervical spine surgery, with worse baseline function associated with a lower likelihood of attaining PASS for NDI and the normative mean for PROMIS PF, especially for patients with radiculopathy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Baseline symptoms and function, including myelopathy or radiculopathy-dominant symptoms and preoperative PROMs, may predict postoperative outcomes.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement Versus Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression: A Matched-Pair Comparison Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes between 2 motion preservation surgeries, cervical disc replacement (CDR) and posterior endoscopic cervical decompression (PECD), for unilateral cervical radiculopathy. METHODS: Between February 2018 and December 2020, 60 patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy who underwent either CDR or PECD were retrospectively recruited as matched pairs. Clinical outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and satisfaction rates. The radiographic outcome was index level motion. Intraoperative data, complications, and hospital stay were collected. Preoperative and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Patients undergoing CDR or PECD were included, with 30 cases in each group. Matched pairs were compared in terms of demographic data and preoperative measurements. CDR was associated with shorter operative times, whereas PECD resulted in less intraoperative blood loss. The total complication rate was 5%. NDI and VAS for neck and arm were significantly improved in both groups, with no significant differences between the 2 groups. Satisfaction rates of good and excellent exceeded 87% in both groups. CDR was superior to PECD in the restoration of disc height. Early postoperative follow-up showed no significant difference in terms of index level motion. PECD demonstrated significantly shorter hospital stays and quicker return-to-work times (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: PECD achieved equivalent clinical and radiologic outcomes compared with CDR when the certain criteria for surgery were met. Both techniques demonstrated the potential to maintain index level motion. Additionally, PECD resulted in less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and faster return-to-work times. Conversely, CDR offered shorter operative times and better restoration of disc height.

Herniated Disc Causing Foraminal Stenosis and Compression of the Unilateral Exiting Nerve Root at C5-C6: A Case Report.

This case report describes the use of unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) for treating a 40-year-old female patient with cervical radiculopathy caused by a herniated disc at C5-C6, which had led to foraminal stenosis and nerve root compression. The patient presented with a one-year history of neck pain radiating to the right upper limb, accompanied by tingling sensations. Imaging revealed loss of cervical lordosis, disc dehydration, and a right-sided foraminal disc protrusion. The patient underwent a right-sided cervical UBE with C5-C6 discectomy and foraminotomy. Postoperatively, the pain was significantly reduced, with improvement in MacNab's grade and visual analog scale scores for neck pain and radiating pain of the upper limb at one- and three-month follow-ups. The procedure demonstrated the effectiveness of UBE in achieving good clinical outcomes with minimal complications, such as reduced soft tissue damage, minimal blood loss, and preserved spinal stability.

Treatment Gaps and Emerging Therapies in Lumbar Disc Herniation.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) occurs when the central disc material, primarily the nucleus pulposus, is displaced beyond the outer annulus, compressing the spinal nerve roots. LDH symptoms, including radicular leg pain, radiculopathy, and low back pain, are associated with considerable disease burden and the significant utilization of health care resources. OBJECTIVES: Provide overview of the current treatment landscape for LDH, identify unmet needs, and describe emerging treatments. STUDY DESIGN: Narrative literature review. METHODS: A review of literature concerning available LDH treatments and associated outcomes was conducted in PubMed to identify areas of unmet need. Some key words included "lumbar disc herniation," "radicular leg pain," "sciatica," "treatment," "therapy," and "burden." RESULTS: For patients who do not respond to conservative therapy, epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are widely used for persistent LDH symptoms. While ESIs provide short-term improvements in radicular pain, evidence that ESIs bestow sustained benefits is limited. ESIs are not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and, in rare cases, carry risks of infection and neurological injury, as well as the potential for long-term systemic effects of glucocorticoids. In cases when nonsurgical treatment fails to relieve symptoms, lumbar discectomy can provide rapid pain relief; however, in addition to the risk of intraoperative complications, the long-term consequences of lumbar discectomy may include recurrent pain or herniation, revision discectomy, loss of disc height, and Modic changes. Treatments for LDH in late-stage clinical development include sustained-release ESI formulations and a novel agent for chemonucleolysis, a nonsurgical method of minimizing the volume of the displaced nucleus pulposus. Emerging minimally invasive therapies that address the underlying pathophysiology of the disease have the potential to bridge the gap between symptomatic treatments and surgery. LIMITATIONS: Because this paper was a narrative review, literature search and selection processes were not systematic in nature. The evidence regarding the long-term efficacy of some treatments, such as discectomy, was limited by the high rates of crossover between the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of sustained benefits associated with ESIs and the risks associated with surgery underscore the unmet need for novel, minimally invasive interventional therapies able to address the underlying nerve root compression in LDH.

Correlation Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings and Advanced Practice Physiotherapists' Assessment Findings in Diagnosing Lumbosacral Radiculopathy, and the Impact of Imaging Findings on Treatment Plans: A Retrospective Clinical Audit.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is increasingly used by Advanced Practice Physiotherapists (APPs) to confirm the diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) and to exclude other spinal pathologies. There is evidence of correlation between Advanced Practice Physiotherapists' diagnosis of lumbosacral radiculopathy and positive MRI findings, but there is limited evidence regarding the correlation between the full physiotherapy assessment and MRI findings. There are also conflicting evidence regarding the effect of MRI findings on treatment planning post-imaging. AIMS: This study aims to examine the extent to which Advanced Practice Physiotherapists' diagnoses of lumbosacral radiculopathy correlate with those made after MRI, and to examine Advanced Practice Physiotherapists use of the local MRI referral pathway with respect to treatment plans, including testing correlation between pre-and post-MRI treatment plans. METHODS: A cross-sectional, multi-centre, retrospective audit was conducted on 482 patients (276 female, 206 male) referred for lumbosacral MRI between January 2018 and December 2019. Non-linear regression analysis was performed to examine the relationships between diagnosis and treatment plans in LSR before and after MRI. RESULTS: The results show a significant positive correlation (p < 0.001; R = 0.196) between pre- and post-MRI diagnoses of lumbosacral radiculopathy. There was a significant positive correlation between pre- and post-MRI treatment plans for LSR (p = 0.001; R = 0.159). On comparison of pre- and post-MRI diagnoses of LSR, there is a weak positive correlation with high statistical significance (p < 0.001; R = 0.196). Reliability, tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) across the four categories, was (p = 0.041; R = 0.033). This shows a weak positive correlation with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced Practice Physiotherapists can confidently diagnose and treat lumbosacral radiculopathy following initial assessment, although a minority of referrals lack a clear or appropriate treatment plan.

Comparison of Complication Rates Between Transforaminal Interbody Fusion and Anteroposterior Fusion for One- or Two-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Introduction Although transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) combined with posterior fusion (AP) have similar fusion rates, it is unclear if choice of approach has an impact on post-operative complications. Research question Is the incidence of residual leg and/or back pain requiring additional treatment after one- or two-level TLIF and AP similar? Material and methods Adult patients who underwent one- or two-level TLIF or AP for degenerative pathology were identified and matched using age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), insurance status, smoking status, revision and number of levels fused. The incidence of radicular leg and back pain requiring emergency department visit/readmission or same level surgical intervention was compared between the two groups. Results Of the 319 TLIF and 288 AP cases, 119 cases in each cohort were matched. TLIF patients had shorter operative times (203 min vs 258 min, P<0.001) and hospital stays than the AP patients (3.76 days vs 4.98 days, P<0.001). The incidence of residual leg pain (7 vs 5, P=0.769) and back pain (13 vs 15, P=0.841) was similar between the two groups. Except for constipation, which was more common in the AP group, the incidence of complications was similar between the two groups. Conclusions Patients undergoing one- or two-level TLIF showed shorter operative time and hospital stay compared with those undergoing AP. The incidence of leg radiculopathy and back pain was similar between the two groups. Surgeons should consider these findings as part of the decision-making process regarding which approach to use in patients requiring a lumbar interbody fusion.

Manual therapy plus sexual advice compared with manual therapy or exercise therapy alone for lumbar radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: The biopsychosocial approach to managing low back pain (LBP) has the potential to improve the quality of care for patients. However, LBP trials that have utilized the biopsychosocial approach to treatment have largely neglected sexual activity, which is an important social component of individuals with LBP. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study are to determine the effects of manual therapy plus sexual advice (MT+SA) compared with manual therapy (MT) or exercise therapy (ET) alone in the management of individuals with lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy (DHR) and to determine the best sexual positions for these individuals. METHODS: This was a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Fifty-four participants diagnosed as having chronic DHR (>3 months) were randomly allocated into three groups with 18 participants each in the MT+SA, MT and ET groups. The participants in the MT+SA group received manual therapy (including Dowling's progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures and Mulligan's spinal mobilization with leg movement) plus sexual advice, those in the MT group received manual therapy only and those in the ET group received exercise therapy only. Each group received treatment for 12 weeks and then followed up for additional 40 weeks. The primary outcomes were pain, activity limitation, sexual disability and kinesiophobia at 12 weeks post-randomization. RESULTS: The MT+SA group improved significantly better than the MT or ET group in all outcomes (except for nerve function), and at all timelines (6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization). These improvements were also clinically meaningful for back pain, leg pain, medication intake, and functional mobility at 6 and 12 weeks post-randomization and for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at 6, 12, 26, and 52 weeks post-randomization (p<0.05). On the other hand, many preferred sexual positions for individuals with DHR emerged, with "side-lying" being the most practiced sexual position and "standing" being the least practiced sexual position by females. While "lying supine" was the most practiced sexual position and "sitting on a chair" was the least practiced sexual position by males. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that individuals with DHR demonstrated better improvements in all outcomes when treated with MT+SA than when treated with MT or ET alone. These improvements were also clinically meaningful for sexual disability, activity limitation, pain catastrophizing, and kinesiophobia at long-term follow-up. There is also no one-size-fits-all to sexual positioning for individuals with DHR.

The effectiveness of cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections for the treatment of cervical radicular pain: A prospective cohort study reporting 12-month outcomes.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection (CTFESI) for the treatment of unilateral cervical radicular pain. Design: Single-group prospective cohort study. Methods: Outcomes included ≥50% reductions in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for arm pain, ≥30% Neck Disability Index (NDI-5) improvement, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), global improvement (PGIC), personal goal achievement (COMBI), Chronic Pain Sleep Index (CPSI), and healthcare utilization at one, three, six, and 12 months. Data analysis included descriptive statistics with the calculations of 95% confidence intervals (CIs), contingency table analysis, and multilevel logistic regression (LR) analysis, including a worst-case (WC) sensitivity analysis in which missing data were treated as treatment failure. Participants who were treated surgically were considered failures in the categorical analyses. Results: 33 consecutively enrolled participants (63.6% females, 51.2 ± 12.2 years of age, BMI 28.3 ± 4.5 kg/m2) were analyzed. Success rates for ≥50% reduction in NRS for arm pain at one, three, six and 12 months were 57.6% (95% CI 40.8-72.8%), 71.9% (95% CI 54.6-84.4%), 64.5% (95% CI 46.9-78.9%), and 64.5% (95% CI 46.9-78.9%). Success rates for ≥30% improvement in NDI-5 were 60.6% (95% CI 43.7-75.3%), 68.8% (95% CI 51.4-82.0%), 61.3% (95% CI 43.8-76.3%), and 71.0% (95% CI 53.4-83.9%). In WC analysis, success rates for ≥50% arm NRS and NDI-5 were 0-4.3% lower between 1 and 12 months. PGIC scores were at least "much improved" or "very much improved," in 48.4-65.6% of participants between 1 and 12 months. 6.1%, 6.1%, and 3.0% had one, two, or three repeat injections, respectively. 18.2% of participants underwent surgery by 12 months. Participants showed significant improvements in arm NRS and NDI-5 after treatment (p < 0.05), multilevel logistic regression models showed no significant decline in improvements across the follow-up time points (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pain and disability were observed after CTFESI for up to 12 months in individuals with unilateral cervical radicular pain.

Practice Patterns of Physicians who Perform Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections.

Introduction: Caudal epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly employed in the management of low back pain and radiculopathy. Despite their widespread use, practice patterns among physicians performing caudal ESIs can vary significantly. This study aims to identify variability in injection techniques utilized by physicians during caudal ESIs, focusing on steroid use, needle selection, and catheter use. This study also looks at major permanent neurological injuries related to caudal ESIs. Methods: A survey was distributed to a cohort of physicians who regularly perform ESIs. The survey comprised questions regarding the type of needle primarily used, steroid selection, the use of catheters, and major neurological injuries from caudal ESIs. The respondents included a diverse group of pain management physicians from various specialties and practice settings. Results: The results revealed a predominant preference for the use of particulate steroids (72.41%) when performing caudal ESIs. Additionally, physicians primarily prefer to use spinal needles (72.41%) compared to other needle types. A majority of physicians (65.12%) reported that they never use a catheter when performing caudal ESIs to access higher pathology. Finally, all physician responders (100%) reported that they have never caused a permanent neurological injury when performing a caudal ESI. Conclusion: This survey provides initial data among physicians who perform caudal ESIs. Our results demonstrate the majority of physicians favor using particulate steroids and a spinal needle, with fewer opting to use a catheter during these procedures. There were no reported major permanent neurological injuries, demonstrating that caudal ESIs are a safe interventional option for managing lumbosacral pain complaints.

Whether the potential degree of cervical instability and cervical muscle degeneration in patients with cervical spondylosis radicular affect the efficacy of cervical traction.

To explore whether the potential instability of the cervical spine and cervical muscle degeneration in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) affect the efficacy of cervical traction, and whether cervical traction can aggravate the potential instability of the cervical spine. We divided the 113 recruited CRS patients into three groups based on the differences in horizontal displacement and abnormal angle, and measured the degree of cervical muscle degeneration in the patients through MRI. Considering functional scores, VAS, NDI and PCS scores of the three groups post-treatment were significantly improved. Through the intergroup analysis, we found that the improvement in functional scores in the mild and moderate instability trend groups was better than that in the severe group. Through MRI measurements, we found that the degree of cervical muscle degeneration was significantly increased in the severe instability trend group. Regarding the changes in X-Ray imaging parameters pre- and post-treatment, no significant differences were observed pre- and post-treatment. For patients with CSR, the more serious their predisposition for cervical instability was, the more severe the degree of cervical muscle degeneration was, which means the worse the curative effect was, but cervical traction did not aggravate the potential degree of cervical instability.

Smaller thoracic canal diameters are associated with thoracic radiculopathy and abdominal pain after spinal cord stimulator paddle lead placement.

INTRODUCTION: It is not uncommon for patients to experience postoperative neurologic deficit, thoracic radiculopathy, abdominal pain, or lower extremity paresthesia after the implantation of thoracic spinal cord stimulator (SCS) paddle leads. Smaller thoracic canal diameters have previously been associated with postoperative neurologic deficits. OBJECTIVE: This imaging study examined whether postoperative SCS neurologic complaints other than neurologic deficit may be correlated with thoracic spinal canal diameter. METHODS: Patients who underwent thoracic laminotomy for SCS paddle lead placement between January 2018 and March 2023 were identified. Preoperative thoracic canal diameter was measured on MRI or CT imaging in the sagittal plane from T5/6 to T11/12. The canal diameters of patients with and without new postoperative neurologic complaints were compared. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-six patients underwent thoracic laminotomy for SCS paddle lead placement. Thoracic radiculopathy, abdominal pain, and lower extremity paresthesia occurred in 3.7% (9/246), 2.8% (7/246), and 2.0% (5/246) patients, respectively. The mean canal diameter for patients without neurologic complaint, thoracic radiculopathy, abdominal pain, and lower extremity paresthesia was 13.1 mm, 12.0 mm (p < 0.0001), 12.1 mm (p < 0.01), and 12.8 mm (p = 0.365), respectively. CONCLUSION: A smaller thoracic canal diameter is associated with postoperative thoracic radiculopathy and abdominal pain. We believe that surgical planning to create adequate space for SCS leads is critical in preventing postoperative neurologic complaints of deficit, thoracic radiculopathy, and abdominal pain.

A comparison of steroid dose with or without local anesthetic in lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections.

INTRODUCTION: Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are commonly used as a treatment for lumbar radiculopathy. Currently, most research on comparative efficacy of various steroids in epidural steroid injections is focused on transforaminal ESIs (TFESIs). Through this study, we aimed to compare various steroid doses with or without local anesthetic in interlaminar ESIs (ILESIs). METHODS: We reviewed charts for all adult patients who received ILESIs identified by CPT code 62323 between January 2017 to April 2021. Baseline demographic data including age, sex, BMI, and smoking status were recorded. NRS pain scores before the injection and percentage of pain relief at 1-month follow-up were recorded. We compared percentage of patients reporting pain relief at 1 month follow-up of low-dose dexamethasone alone (5 mg), to low-dose dexamethasone mixed with local anesthetic, and to high-dose dexamethasone (10 mg) mixed with local anesthetic, specifically for ILESIs. RESULTS: Data were available for 311 patients. There was no significant difference in pain relief between the 3 groups at 1 month follow-up. The majority of patients had moderate to significant improvement in pain, supporting the use of ILESIs. Moreover, low-dose steroid with local anesthetic was found to be as efficacious as high-dose steroid alone. Although not statistically significant, the addition of local anesthetic to low-dose or high-dose steroid increased the percentage of patients reporting moderate to significant pain relief. CONCLUSION: ILESIs with non-particulate steroids provide moderate to significant pain improvement in the short term, with low-dose steroid mixed with local anesthetic being as efficacious as a high-dose steroid.

A clinical decision support system for diagnosis and severity quantification of lumbosacral radiculopathy using intramuscular electromyography signals.

Interpreting intramuscular electromyography (iEMG) signals for diagnosing and quantifying the severity of lumbosacral radiculopathy is challenging due to the subjective evaluation of signals. To address this limitation, a clinical decision support system (CDSS) was developed for the diagnosis and quantification of the severity of lumbosacral radiculopathy based on intramuscular electromyography (iEMG) signals. The CDSS uses the EMG interference pattern method (QEMG IP) to directly extract features from the iEMG signal and provide a quantitative expression of injury severity for each muscle and overall radiculopathy severity. From 126 time and frequency domain features, a set of five features, including the crest factor, mean absolute value, peak frequency, zero crossing count, and intensity, were selected. These features were derived from raw iEMG signals, empirical mode decomposition, and discrete wavelet transform, and the wrapper method was utilized to determine the most significant features. The CDSS was trained and tested on a dataset of 75 patients, achieving an accuracy of 93.3%, sensitivity of 93.3%, and specificity of 96.6%. The system shows promise in assisting physicians in diagnosing lumbosacral radiculopathy with high accuracy and consistency using iEMG data. The CDSS's objective and standardized diagnostic process, along with its potential to reduce the time and effort required by physicians to interpret EMG signals, makes it a potentially valuable tool for clinicians in the diagnosis and management of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Future work should focus on validating the system's performance in diverse clinical settings and patient populations.

Cervical Spine Myelopathy Caused by Calcium Pyrophosphate Dihydrate Deposition of the Ligamentum Flavum: A Case Report.

Calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition (CPPD), commonly known as pseudogout, is an inflammatory arthropathy primarily affecting the knee, wrist, hip, and shoulder joints. However, it can occasionally deposit in various structures surrounding the spinal column, including the facet joints, ligamentum flavum, bursae, and intervertebral discs. Such occurrences are typically asymptomatic or associated with mild neck pain. Nonetheless, severe cases may lead to myeloradiculopathy, characterized by severe neck pain and upper extremity weakness. Conservative management with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is often sufficient for mild cases, while surgical decompression remains the gold standard for severe cases with significant spinal cord compression. Herein, we present a rare case of pseudogout, manifesting as cervical spine myelopathy due to calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition in the ligamentum flavum and facet joints at C1-2. This was found incidentally during cervical spine decompression and fusion and subsequentially confirmed through pathological examination. Following the removal of the compressive pathology, the patient reported significant improvements in neck pain and neurological symptoms. This case underscores the importance of considering pseudogout in the differential diagnosis of acute neck pain presenting with myelopathy or radiculopathy.

Safety and efficacy of the new modified technique for c2 nerve root resection in 3d fluoroscopy navigated instrumentation in the cranio-cervical junction.

PURPOSE: Instrumentation of the C1 vertebra requires either mobilization or transection of the C2 nerve root. This study investigates clinical and radiological outcomes and incidences of C2 neuropathic pain after posterior instrumented fusion in the cranio-cervical junction with or without division of the C2 nerve roots. METHODS: This retrospective study compared two cohorts of patients who underwent instrumented fusion in the cranio-cervical junction. Fifty patients (22 males and 28 females) were operated with complete resection of C2 nerve root ganglion (Ex group), and fifty-one patients (30 men, 21 women) with C2 nerve roots preservation (No group). RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative C2 neuropathy was eight times lower in the Ex group compared to the No group that was statistical significant, p = 0.039. Surgical time was significantly shorter in the No group (p = 0.001). The fusion rates were very high for both groups, without difference between groups (p = 1.0). Autografting from the iliac crest (p = 0.001) as well as postoperative immobilisation with a hard collar (p < 0.001) were required in fewer patients in the Ex group. Also, patients in the Ex group were mobilised faster after surgery (p = 0.49). Overall, complication rates were similar between groups, but the Ex group demonstrated fewer major medical complications (16% vs 31%). Male sex and iliac bone harvesting demonstrated significantly higher OR for development of postoperative complications (p = 0.023 and p = 0.034 respectively) and postoperative mobilization demonstrated significant higher OR for development of postoperative major complications (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the C2 nerve root ganglion during posterior instrumented fusion of the cranio-cervical junction is safe and rarely leads to C2 neuropathy. The technique tends to mitigate the odds of developing postoperative complications.