State-dependent effects of responsive neurostimulation depend on seizure localization.

Brain-responsive neurostimulation is firmly ensconced among treatment options for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but over a quarter of patients treated with the RNS System do not experience meaningful seizure reduction. Initial titration of RNS therapy is typically similar for all patients, raising the possibility that treatment response might be enhanced by consideration of patient-specific variables. Indeed, small, single-center studies have yielded preliminary evidence that RNS System effectiveness depends on the brain state during which stimulation is applied. The generalizability of these findings remains unclear, however, and it is unknown whether state-dependent effects of responsive neurostimulation are also stratified by location of the seizure onset zone where stimulation is delivered. We aimed to determine whether state-dependent effects of the RNS System are evident in the large, diverse, multi-center cohort of RNS System clinical trial participants and to test whether these effects differ between mesiotemporal and neocortical epilepsies. Eighty-one of 256 patients who were treated with the RNS System across 31 centers during clinical trials met criteria for inclusion in this retrospective study. Risk states were defined in relation to phases of daily and multi-day cycles of interictal epileptiform activity that are thought to determine seizure likelihood. We found that the probabilities of risk state transitions depended on the stimulation parameter being changed, the starting seizure risk state, and the stimulated brain region. Changes in two commonly adjusted stimulation parameters, charge density and stimulation frequency, produced opposite effects on risk state transitions depending on seizure localization. Greater variance in acute risk state transitions was explained by state-dependent responsive neurostimulation for bipolar stimulation for neocortical epilepsies and for monopolar stimulation for mesiotemporal epilepsies. Variability in effectiveness of RNS System therapy across individuals may relate, at least partly, to the fact that current treatment paradigms do not account fully for fluctuations in brain states or locations of simulation sites. State-dependence of electrical brain stimulation may inform development of next-generation closed-loop devices that can detect changes in brain state and deliver adaptive, localization-specific patterns of stimulation to maximize therapeutic effects.

Advancing thalamic neuromodulation in epilepsy: Bridging adult data to pediatric care.

Thalamic neuromodulation has emerged as a treatment option for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) with widespread and/or undefined epileptogenic networks. While deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) depth electrodes offer means for electrical stimulation of the thalamus in adult patients with DRE, the application of thalamic neuromodulation in pediatric epilepsy remains limited. To address this gap, the Neuromodulation Expert Collaborative was established within the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium (PERC) Epilepsy Surgery Special Interest Group. In this expert review, existing evidence and recommendations for thalamic neuromodulation modalities using DBS and RNS are summarized, with a focus on the anterior (ANT), centromedian(CMN), and pulvinar nuclei of the thalamus. To-date, only DBS of the ANT is FDA approved for treatment of DRE in adult patients based on the results of the pivotal SANTE (Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of Thalamus for Epilepsy) study. Evidence for other thalamic neurmodulation indications and targets is less abundant. Despite the lack of evidence, positive responses to thalamic stimulation in adults with DRE have led to its off-label use in pediatric patients. Although caution is warranted due to differences between pediatric and adult epilepsy, the efficacy and safety of pediatric neuromodulation appear comparable to that in adults. Indeed, CMN stimulation is increasingly accepted for generalized and diffuse onset epilepsies, with recent completion of one randomized trial. There is also growing interest in using pulvinar stimulation for temporal plus and posterior quadrant epilepsies with one ongoing clinical trial in Europe. The future of thalamic neuromodulation holds promise for revolutionizing the treatment landscape of childhood epilepsy. Ongoing research, technological advancements, and collaborative efforts are poised to refine and improve thalamic neuromodulation strategies, ultimately enhancing the quality of life for children with DRE.

The comparison of DBS and RNS for adult drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: Neuromodulation has been proven to be a promising alternative treatment for adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) were approved by many countries for the treatment of DRE. However, there is a lack of systematic studies illustrating the differences between them. This meta-analysis is performed to assess the efficacy and clinical characteristics of DBS and RNS in adult patients with DRE. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were retrieved to obtain related studies including adult DRE patients who accepted DBS or RNS. The clinical characteristics of these patients were compiled for the following statistical analysis. Results: A total of 55 studies (32 of DBS and 23 of RNS) involving 1,568 adult patients with DRE were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in seizure reduction and responder rate between DBS and RNS for DRE. The seizure reduction of DBS and RNS were 56% (95% CI 50-62%, p > 0.05) and 61% (95% CI 54-68%, p > 0.05). The responder rate of DBS and RNS were 67% (95% CI 58-76%, p > 0.05) and 71% (95% CI 64-78%, p > 0.05). Different targets of DBS did not show significant effect on seizure reduction (p > 0.05). Patients with DRE who accepted DBS were younger than those of RNS (32.9 years old vs. 37.8 years old, p < 0.01). The mean follow-up time was 47.3 months for DBS and 39.5 months for RNS (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Both DBS and RNS are beneficial and alternative therapies for adult DRE patients who are not eligible to accept resection surgery. Further and larger studies are needed to clarify the characteristics of different targets and provide tailored treatment for patients with DRE.

Robot-assisted, CT-guided placement of responsive neurostimulator system with bilateral centromedian thalamus depth electrodes for multifocal intractable epilepsy.

The responsive neurostimulator system has become increasingly popular in the surgical management of refractory epilepsy, with targeting of various thalamic nuclei showing promising results in select patients. A 42-year-old female presented for evaluation of refractory epilepsy consisting of generalized tonic-clonic and focal seizures with preserved awareness. Phase I and II monitoring suggested multifocal bilateral epilepsy with bilateral frontal onset, and the patient underwent robot-guided bilateral centromedian thalamic placement of the RNS System. In this operative video, the authors share their institutional experience and protocol utilizing the ExcelsiusGPS robot in the placement of the RNS System in the thalamus. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2024.4.FOCVID243.

Responsive neurostimulation in pediatric epilepsy: a systematic review and individual patient meta-analysis supplemented by a single institution case series in 105 aggregated patients.

PURPOSE: To assess responsive neurostimulation (RNS) efficacy in pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, comparing response (≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency) rates between patients with two or fewer seizure foci and those with multifocal or generalized epilepsy. This study seeks to address the gap in knowledge regarding RNS effectiveness in pediatric populations. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis included data from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science through November 2023, including 17 retrospective studies and a case series of 24 patients from our practice for a total of 105 aggregated patients. The inclusion criteria of patients were age ≤ 18 and diagnosis of DRE. Exclusion criteria were nonhuman subjects and cases where RNS was not utilized to treat DRE. Study inclusion criteria were detailing the use of RNS and comparing patients with ≤ 2 foci with other focalities. Study exclusion criteria were failure to specify RNS lead placement or type of epilepsy. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool for all non-randomized studies. Effect sizes and variances were aggregated to provide a comprehensive measure of RNS efficacy, and heterogeneity among the studies was assessed using I2 statistics and Cochran's Q test to evaluate the consistency of the findings. Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS. We analyzed demographics, epilepsy history, treatment outcomes, and RNS details using descriptive and inferential statistics, including Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, Fisher's exact, and chi-squared tests. This systematic review was not registered. RESULTS: Seventeen retrospective studies and a single-institution case series, encompassing 105 pediatric patients, were analyzed. Effect sizes and confidence intervals were calculated to quantify treatment effects. Analyses revealed that RNS reduces seizure frequency across a spectrum of pediatric epilepsy syndromes, irrespective of the seizures' focal, multifocal, or generalized origins. The effectiveness of RNS was not influenced by the patient's sex, age at epilepsy onset, or presence of neurological and psychiatric comorbidities. Prior vagus nerve stimulation surgery and the presence of an epileptic syndrome were factors associated with a lower likelihood of near-complete seizure remission with RNS, underscoring the complexities of treating patients with generalized epilepsies or previous interventional failures. The necessity of further research into individualized surgical strategies for patients was underscored by the mixed results of comparisons of electrode characteristics with responder rates. Limitations of our study include its reliance on retrospective studies, which introduces potential bias and limits the ability to infer causality. DISCUSSION: RNS is a safe and effective treatment in pediatric patients with DRE across demographic, comorbidity, and focality variability. FDA age and focality restrictions, along with patient and physician hesitancy, may be limiting the potential for effective treatment of pediatric DRE with RNS. Prospective randomized trials are recommended to validate these findings.

National 22-year epilepsy surgery landscape shows increasing open and minimally invasive pediatric epilepsy surgery.

OBJECTIVES: A surgical "treatment gap" in pediatric epilepsy persists despite the demonstrated safety and effectiveness of surgery. For this reason, the national surgical landscape should be investigated such that an updated assessment may more appropriately guide health care efforts. METHODS: In our retrospective cross-sectional observational study, the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for individuals 0 to <18 years of age who had an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This cohort was then split into a medical group and a surgical group. The former was defined by ICD codes for -DRE without an accompanying surgical code, and the latter was defined by DRE and one of the following epilepsy surgeries: any open surgery; laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT); vagus nerve stimulation; or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) from 1998 to 2020. Demographic variables of age, gender, race, insurance type, hospital charge, and hospital characteristics were analyzed between surgical options. Continuous variables were analyzed with weight-adjusted quantile regression analysis, and categorical variables were analyzed by weight-adjusted counts with percentages and compared with weight-adjusted chi-square test results. RESULTS: These data indicate an increase in epilepsy surgeries over a 22-year period, primarily due to a statistically significant increase in open surgery and a non-significant increase in minimally invasive techniques, such as LITT and RNS. There are significant differences in age, race, gender, insurance type, median household income, Elixhauser index, hospital setting, and size between the medical and surgical groups, as well as the procedure performed. SIGNIFICANCE: An increase in open surgery and minimally invasive surgeries (LITT and RNS) account for the overall rise in pediatric epilepsy surgery over the last 22 years. A positive inflection point in open surgery is seen in 2005. Socioeconomic disparities exist between medical and surgical groups. Patient and hospital sociodemographics show significant differences between the procedure performed. Further efforts are required to close the surgical "treatment gap."

Combined neuromodulation and resection for functional cortex epilepsy: a case series.

OBJECTIVE: Medically refractory epilepsy (MRE) often requires resection of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) for effective treatment. However, when the SOZ is in functional cortex (FC), achieving complete and safe resection becomes difficult, due to the seizure network overlap with function. The authors aimed to assess the safety and outcomes of a combined approach involving partial resection combined with focal neuromodulation for FC refractory epilepsy. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of individuals diagnosed with MRE who underwent surgical intervention from January 2015 to December 2022. Patients whose SOZ was located in FC and were treated with resection combined with simultaneous implantation of a focal neuromodulation device (responsive neurostimulation [RNS] device) with more than 12 months of follow-up data were included. All patients underwent a standard epilepsy preoperative assessment including intracranial electroencephalography and extraoperative stimulation mapping. Resections were performed under general anesthesia, followed by the concurrent implantation of an RNS device. RESULTS: Seven patients (4 males, median age 32.3 years, all right-handed) were included. The median interval from seizure onset to surgery was 17.4 years. The epileptogenic network included sensorimotor areas (cases 2, 3, and 6), visual cortex (case 1), language areas (cases 4 and 7), and the insula (case 5). The median follow-up was 3 years (range 1-5.8 years). No significant changes in neuropsychological tests were reported. One permanent nondisabling planned neurological deficit (left inferior quadrantanopia) was observed. Six patients had stimulation activated at a median of 4.7 months after resection. All patients achieved good seizure outcomes (5 with Engel class I and 2 with Engel class II outcomes). CONCLUSIONS: Maximal safe resection combined with focal neuromodulation presents a promising alternative to stand-alone resections for MRE epileptogenic zones overlapping with functional brain. This combined approach prioritizes the preservation of function while improving seizure outcomes.

Optimal hippocampal targeting in responsive neurostimulation for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify features of responsive neurostimulation (RNS) lead configuration and contact placement associated with greater seizure reduction in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). METHODS: A single-center series of patients with MTLE treated with RNS were retrospectively analyzed to assess the relationship between anatomical targeting and seizure reduction. Targeting was determined according to both the preoperatively conceived lead configuration and the actual placement of RNS contacts. Three lead configurations were used: 1) single bilateral, with 1 depth lead in each hippocampus; 2) single unilateral, with 1 hippocampal depth lead and another implant outside the mesial temporal lobe; and 3) dual unilateral, with 2 leads in 1 hippocampus. Contact placement on postoperative imaging was measured according to the number of hippocampal contacts per targeted hippocampus (contact density) and per patient (contact count), distribution throughout the hippocampus, and proximity to the anteromedial hippocampus. RESULTS: Dual unilateral lead placement resulted in significantly higher hippocampal contact density compared with the single hippocampal approaches, but only showed a nonsignificant trend toward a higher rate of response. However, those patients with more than 4 contacts in a single hippocampus, achievable only with dual unilateral leads, had a significantly higher rate of response. The higher likelihood of response was poorly explained by more widespread hippocampal coverage, but well correlated with proximity to the anteromedial hippocampus. CONCLUSIONS: Dual unilateral hippocampal implantation increased RNS contact density in patients with unilateral MTLE, which contributed to improved outcomes, not by stimulating more of the hippocampus, but instead by being more likely to stimulate a latent subtarget in the anterior hippocampus. It remains to be explored whether a single electrode targeted selectively to this region would also result in improved outcomes.

Responsive neurostimulation of thalamic nuclei for regional and multifocal drug-resistant epilepsy in children and young adults.

OBJECTIVE: Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a US FDA-approved form of neuromodulation to treat patients with focal-onset drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) who are ineligible for or whose condition is refractory to resection. However, the FDA approval only extends to use in patients with one or two epileptogenic foci. Recent literature has shown possible efficacy of thalamic RNS in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and multifocal epilepsy. The authors hypothesized that RNS of thalamic nuclei may be effective in seizure reduction for patients with multifocal or regionalized-onset DRE. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who had an RNS device managed at Texas Children's Hospital between July 2016 and September 2023, with at least one active electrode in the thalamic nuclei and ≥ 12 months of postimplantation follow-up. Information conveyed by the patient or their caregiver provided data on the change in the clinical seizure frequency, quality of life (QOL), and seizure severity between the preimplantation baseline visit and the last office visit (LOV). RESULTS: Thirteen patients (ages 8-24 years) were identified with active RNS leads in thalamic nuclei (11 centromedian and 2 anterior nucleus). At LOV, 46% of patients reported 50%-100% clinical seizure reduction (classified as responders), 15% reported 25%-49% reduction, and 38% reported < 25% reduction or no change. Additionally, 42% of patients reported subjective improvement in QOL and 58% reported improved seizure severity. Patients with focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) responded strongly: 3 of 5 (60%) reported ≥ 80% reduction in seizure burden and improvement in seizure severity and QOL. Patients with multifocal epilepsy and bilateral thalamocortical leads also did well, with all 3 reporting ≥ 50% reduction in seizures. CONCLUSIONS: RNS of thalamic nuclei shows promising results in reducing seizure burden for patients with multifocal or regional-onset DRE, particularly in a bilateral thalamocortical configuration or when addressing an underlying FCD.

The role of neuromodulation in the management of drug-resistant epilepsy.

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) poses significant challenges in terms of effective management and seizure control. Neuromodulation techniques have emerged as promising solutions for individuals who are unresponsive to pharmacological treatments, especially for those who are not good surgical candidates for surgical resection or laser interstitial therapy (LiTT). Currently, there are three neuromodulation techniques that are FDA-approved for the management of DRE. These include vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). Device selection, optimal time, and DBS and RNS target selection can also be challenging. In general, the number and localizability of the epileptic foci, alongside the comorbidities manifested by the patients, substantially influence the selection process. In the past, the general axiom was that DBS and VNS can be used for generalized and localized focal seizures, while RNS is typically reserved for patients with one or two highly localized epileptic foci, especially if they are in eloquent areas of the brain. Nowadays, with the advance in our understanding of thalamic involvement in DRE, RNS is also very effective for general non-focal epilepsy. In this review, we will discuss the underlying mechanisms of action, patient selection criteria, and the evidence supporting the use of each technique. Additionally, we explore emerging technologies and novel approaches in neuromodulation, such as closed-loop systems. Moreover, we examine the challenges and limitations associated with neuromodulation therapies, including adverse effects, complications, and the need for further long-term studies. This comprehensive review aims to provide valuable insights on present and future use of neuromodulation.

The changing landscape of palliative epilepsy surgery for Lennox Gastaut Syndrome.

Lennox Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is characterized by drug-resistant epilepsy that typically leads to decreased quality of life and deleterious neurodevelopmental comorbidities from medically refractory seizures. In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the development and availability of novel treatment strategies for Lennox Gastaut Syndrome patient to improve seizure. Recent advances in neuromodulation and minimally invasive magnetic resonance guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) have paved the way for new treatments strategies including deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and MRgLITT corpus callosum ablation. These new strategies offer hope for children with drug-resistant generalized epilepsies, but important questions remain about the safety and effectiveness of these new approaches. In this review, we describe the opportunities presented by these new strategies and how each treatment strategy is currently being employed. Next, we will critically assess available evidence for these new approaches compared to traditional palliative epilepsy surgery approaches, such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and open microsurgical corpus callosotomy (CC). Finally, we will describe future directions that would help define which of the available strategies should be employed and when.

Racial disparities in the utilization of invasive neuromodulation devices for the treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Racial disparities affect multiple dimensions of epilepsy care including epilepsy surgery. This study aims to further explore these disparities by determining the utilization of invasive neuromodulation devices according to race and ethnicity in a multicenter study of patients living with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). We performed a post hoc analysis of the Human Epilepsy Project 2 (HEP2) data. HEP2 is a prospective study of patients living with focal DRE involving 10 sites distributed across the United States. There were no statistical differences in the racial distribution of the study population compared to the US population using census data except for patients reporting more than one race. Of 154 patients enrolled in HEP2, 55 (36%) underwent invasive neuromodulation for DRE management at some point in the course of their epilepsy. Of those, 36 (71%) were patients who identified as White. Patients were significantly less likely to have a device if they identified solely as Black/African American than if they did not (odds ratio = .21, 95% confidence interval = .05-.96, p = .03). Invasive neuromodulation for management of DRE is underutilized in the Black/African American population, indicating a new facet of racial disparities in epilepsy care.

Patient experiences of resection versus responsive neurostimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy.

This study explored illness experiences and decision-making among patients with epilepsy who underwent two different types of surgical interventions: resection versus implantation of the NeuroPace Responsive Neurostimulation System (RNS). We recruited 31 participants from a level four epilepsy center in an academic medical institution. We observed 22 patient clinic visits (resection: n = 10, RNS: n = 12) and conducted 18 in-depth patient interviews (resection: n = seven, RNS: n = 11); most visits and interviews included patient caregivers. Using an applied ethnographic approach, we identified three major themes in the experiences of resection versus RNS patients. First, for patients in both cohorts, the therapeutic journey was circuitous in ways that defied standardized first-, second-, and third- line of care models. Second, in conceptualizing risk, resection patients emphasized the permanent loss of "taking out" brain tissue whereas RNS patients highlighted the reversibility of "putting in" a device. Lastly, in considering benefit, resection patients perceived their surgery as potentially curative while RNS patients understood implantation as primarily palliative with possible additional diagnostic benefit from chronic electrocorticography. Insight into the perspectives of patients and caregivers may help identify key topics for counseling and exploration by clinicians.

Effective connectivity relates seizure outcome to electrode placement in responsive neurostimulation.

Responsive neurostimulation is a closed-loop neuromodulation therapy for drug resistant focal epilepsy. Responsive neurostimulation electrodes are placed near ictal onset zones so as to enable detection of epileptiform activity and deliver electrical stimulation. There is no standard approach for determining the optimal placement of responsive neurostimulation electrodes. Clinicians make this determination based on presurgical tests, such as MRI, EEG, magnetoencephalography, ictal single-photon emission computed tomography and intracranial EEG. Currently functional connectivity measures are not being used in determining the placement of responsive neurostimulation electrodes. Cortico-cortical evoked potentials are a measure of effective functional connectivity. Cortico-cortical evoked potentials are generated by direct single-pulse electrical stimulation and can be used to investigate cortico-cortical connections in vivo. We hypothesized that the presence of high amplitude cortico-cortical evoked potentials, recorded during intracranial EEG monitoring, near the eventual responsive neurostimulation contact sites is predictive of better outcomes from its therapy. We retrospectively reviewed 12 patients in whom cortico-cortical evoked potentials were obtained during stereoelectroencephalography evaluation and subsequently underwent responsive neurostimulation therapy. We studied the relationship between cortico-cortical evoked potentials, the eventual responsive neurostimulation electrode locations and seizure reduction. Directional connectivity indicated by cortico-cortical evoked potentials can categorize stereoelectroencephalography electrodes as either receiver nodes/in-degree (an area of greater inward connectivity) or projection nodes/out-degree (greater outward connectivity). The follow-up period for seizure reduction ranged from 1.3-4.8 years (median 2.7) after responsive neurostimulation therapy started. Stereoelectroencephalography electrodes closest to the eventual responsive neurostimulation contact site tended to show larger in-degree cortico-cortical evoked potentials, especially for the early latency cortico-cortical evoked potentials period (10-60 ms period) in six out of 12 patients. Stereoelectroencephalography electrodes closest to the responsive neurostimulation contacts (≤5 mm) also had greater significant out-degree in the early cortico-cortical evoked potentials latency period than those further away (≥10 mm) (P < 0.05). Additionally, significant correlation was noted between in-degree cortico-cortical evoked potentials and greater seizure reduction with responsive neurostimulation therapy at its most effective period (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that functional connectivity determined by cortico-cortical evoked potentials may provide additional information that could help guide the optimal placement of responsive neurostimulation electrodes.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) Data Processing in Epilepsy Patients with Implanted Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) Devices.

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is often treated with surgery or neuromodulation. Specifically, responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a widely used therapy that is programmed to detect abnormal brain activity and intervene with tailored stimulation. Despite the success of RNS, some patients require further interventions. However, having an RNS device in situ is a hindrance to the performance of neuroimaging techniques. Magnetoencephalography (MEG), a non-invasive neurophysiologic and functional imaging technique, aids epilepsy assessment and surgery planning. MEG performed post-RNS is complicated by signal distortions. This study proposes an independent component analysis (ICA)-based approach to enhance MEG signal quality, facilitating improved assessment for epilepsy patients with implanted RNS devices. Three epilepsy patients, two with RNS implants and one without, underwent MEG scans. Preprocessing included temporal signal space separation (tSSS) and an automated ICA-based approach with MNE-Python. Power spectral density (PSD) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were analyzed, and MEG dipole analysis was conducted using single equivalent current dipole (SECD) modeling. The ICA-based noise removal preprocessing method substantially improved the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for MEG data from epilepsy patients with implanted RNS devices. Qualitative assessment confirmed enhanced signal readability and improved MEG dipole analysis. ICA-based processing markedly enhanced MEG data quality in RNS patients, emphasizing its clinical relevance.

Laser amygdalohippocampotomy reduces contralateral hippocampal sub-clinical activity in bitemporal epilepsy: A case illustration of responsive neurostimulator ambulatory recordings.

Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a valuable tool in the diagnosis and treatment of medication refractory epilepsy (MRE) and provides clinicians with better insights into patients' seizure patterns. In this case illustration, we present a patient with bilateral hippocampal RNS for presumed bilateral mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. The patient subsequently underwent a right sided LITT amygdalohippocampotomy based upon chronic RNS data revealing predominance of seizures from that side. Analyzing electrocorticography (ECOG) from the RNS system, we identified the frequency of high amplitude discharges recorded from the left hippocampal lead pre- and post- right LITT amygdalohippocampotomy. A reduction in contralateral interictal epileptiform activity was observed through RNS recordings over a two-year period, suggesting the potential dependency of the contralateral activity on the primary epileptogenic zone. These findings suggest that early targeted surgical resection or laser ablation by leveraging RNS data can potentially impede the progression of dependent epileptiform activity and may aid in preserving neurocognitive networks. RNS recordings are essential in shaping further management decisions for our patient with a presumed bitemporal epilepsy.

Predictors of therapeutic response following thalamic neuromodulation for drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

We sought to perform a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to identify predictors of treatment response following thalamic neuromodulation in pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane) were searched, with no language or data restriction, to identify studies reporting seizure outcomes in pediatric populations following deep brain stimulation (DBS) or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) implantation in thalamic nuclei. Studies featuring individual participant data of patients with primary or secondary generalized drug-resistant epilepsy were included. Response to therapy was defined as >50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. Of 417 citations, 21 articles reporting on 88 participants were eligible. Mean age at implantation was 13.07 ± 3.49 years. Fifty (57%) patients underwent DBS, and 38 (43%) RNS. Sixty (68%) patients were implanted in centromedian nucleus and 23 (26%) in anterior thalamic nucleus, and five (6%) had both targets implanted. Seventy-four (84%) patients were implanted bilaterally. The median time to last follow-up was 12 months (interquartile range = 6.75-26.25). Sixty-nine percent of patients achieved response to treatment. Age, target, modality, and laterality had no significant association with response in univariate logistic regression. Until thalamic neuromodulation gains widespread approval for use in pediatric patients, data on efficacy will continue to be limited to small retrospective cohorts and case series. The inherent bias of these studies can be overcome by using individual participant data. Thalamic neuromodulation appears to be a safe and effective treatment for epilepsy. Larger, prolonged prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate the efficacy of DBS over RNS in this patient population where resection for curative intent is not a safe option.