Soluble Mesothelin-Related Peptide as a Prognosticator in Pleural Mesothelioma Patients Receiving Checkpoint Immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has significantly impacted malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) treatment. Despite some promising results from combination therapies, nearly half of MPM patients do not benefit, underscoring the urgent need for reliable predictive biomarkers. This study assesses the prognostic value of serum soluble mesothelin-related peptide (SMRP) and PD-L1 levels in MPM patients receiving ICT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 125 MPM patients treated with ICT by measuring pre-ICT serum levels of SMRP and PD-L1. We also examined the correlation of these serum levels with tumor mRNA expressions of MSLN and PD-L1. Both univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine independent prognosticators for overall survival (OS). A prospective ICT clinical trial and our historical cohort were included for validation. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients (62%) were treated with either anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy, and the remaining 38% were given combination ICT. Higher pre-ICT SMRP levels were observed in epithelioid versus non-epithelioid MPM. Serum PD-L1 levels did not show significant differences between the groups. Univariable analysis identified durable clinical benefit, development of immune-related adverse events, and SMRP levels as significantly associated with OS. Multivariable analysis confirmed SMRP as an independent prognostic factor, with lower levels (≤1.35 nmol/L) correlating with improved OS. The association of high SMRP with worse prognosis was validated in the prospective ICT clinical trial cohort and not in our historical cohort treated without ICT. CONCLUSIONS: SMRP is a promising serum biomarker for predicting survival in MPM patients treated with ICT and warrants prospective investigation.

Efficacy of durvalumab plus chemotherapy in advanced biliary duct cancer and biomarkers exploration.

BACKGROUND: The anti-PD-L1 antibody durvalumab has been approved for use in first-line advanced biliary duct cancer (ABC). So far, predictive biomarkers of efficacy are lacking. METHODS: ABC patients who underwent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy with or without durvalumab were retrospectively enrolled, and their baseline clinical pathological indices were retrieved from medical records. Overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated and analyzed. The levels of peripheral biomarkers from 48 patients were detected with assay kits including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Genomic alterations in 27 patients whose tumor tissues were available were depicted via targeted next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: A total of 186 ABC patients met the inclusion criteria between January 2020 and December 2022 were finally enrolled in this study. Of these, 93 patients received chemotherapy with durvalumab and the rest received chemotherapy alone. Durvalumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated significant improvements in PFS (6.77 vs. 4.99 months; hazard ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.48-0.88]; P = 0.005), but not OS (14.29 vs. 13.24 months; hazard ratio 0.91 [95% CI 0.62-1.32]; P = 0.608) vs. chemotherapy alone in previously untreated ABC patients. The objective response rate (ORR) in patients receiving chemotherapy with and without durvalumab was 19.1% and 7.8%, respectively. Pretreatment sPD-L1, CSF1R and OPG were identified as significant prognosis predictors in patients receiving durvalumab. ADGRB3 and RNF43 mutations were enriched in patients who responded to chemotherapy plus durvalumab and correlated with superior survival. CONCLUSION: This retrospective real-world study confirmed the clinical benefit of durvalumab plus chemotherapy in treatment-naïve ABC patients. Peripheral sPD-L1 and CSF1R are promising prognostic biomarkers for this therapeutic strategy. Presence of ADGRB3 or RNF43 mutations could improve the stratification of immunotherapy outcomes, but further studies are warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms.

PD-L1: From cancer immunotherapy to therapeutic implications in multiple disorders.

The PD-L1/PD-1 signaling pathway is the gold standard for cancer immunotherapy. Therapeutic antibodies targeting PD-1, such as nivolumab (Opdivo) and pembrolizumab (Keytruda), and PD-L1, including atezolizumab (Tecentriq), durvalumab (Imfinzi), and avelumab (Bavencio) have received Food and Drug Administration approval and are currently being used to treat various cancers. Traditionally, PD-L1 is known as an immune checkpoint protein that binds to the PD-1 receptor on its surface to inhibit the activity of T cells, which are the primary effector cells in antitumor immunity. However, it also plays a role in cancer progression, which goes beyond traditional understanding. Here, we highlight the multifaceted mechanisms of action of PD-L1 in cancer cell proliferation, transcriptional regulation, and systemic immune suppression. Moreover, we consider the potential role of PD-L1 in the development and pathogenesis of diseases other than cancer, explore PD-L1-focused therapeutic approaches for these diseases, and assess their clinical relevance. Through this review, we hope to provide deeper insights into the PD-L1/PD-1 signaling pathway and present a broad perspective on potential therapeutic approaches for cancer and other diseases.

Prognostic significance of soluble PD-L1 in prostate cancer.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the role of sPD-L1 and sPD-1 as potential biomarkers in prostate cancer (PCa). The association of the values of these soluble proteins were correlated to the clinical data: stage of disease, Gleason score, biochemical recurrence etc. For a comprehensive study, the relationship between sPD-L1 and sPD-1 and circulating immune cells was further investigated. Methods: A total of 88 patients with pT2 and pT3 PCa diagnosis and 41 heathy men were enrolled. Soluble sPD-L1 and sPD-1 levels were measured in plasma by ELISA method. Immunophenotyping was performed by flow cytometry analysis. Results: Our study's findings demonstrate that PCa patients had higher levels of circulating sPD-L1 and sPD-1 comparing to healthy controls (p < 0.001). We found a statistically significant (p < 0.05) relationship between improved progression free survival and lower initial sPD-L1 values. Furthermore, patients with a lower sPD-1/sPD-L1 ratio were associated with a higher probability of disease progression (p < 0.05). Additionally, a significant (p < 0.05) association was discovered between higher Gleason scores and elevated preoperative sPD-L1 levels and between sPD-1 and advanced stage of disease (p < 0.05). A strong correlation (p < 0.05), between immunosuppressive CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells and baseline sPD-L1 was observed in patients with unfavorable postoperative course of the disease, supporting the idea that these elements influence each other in cancer progression. In addition to the postoperative drop in circulating PD-L1, the inverse relationship (p < 0.05), between the percentage of M-MDSC and sPD-L1 in patients with BCR suggests that M-MDSC is not a source of sPD-L1 in PCa patients. Conclusion: Our findings suggest the potential of sPD-L1 as a promising prognostic marker in prostate cancer.

Lysosomal degradation of PD-L1 is associated with immune-related adverse events during anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in NSCLC patients.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Liquid biomarkers to predict irAE occurrence are urgently needed. We previously developed an ELISA system to specifically detect soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) with PD-1-binding capacity (bsPD-L1). Here, we investigated the relationship between sPD-L1 and bsPD-L1 in gastric cancer (GC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and their association with irAEs. Methods: We examined sPD-L1, bsPD-L1, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and proinflammatory cytokine levels by ELISA in plasma samples from 117 GC patients prior to surgery and 72 NSCLC patients prior to and at 2 months after ICI treatment (anti-PD-1, n = 48; anti-PD-L1, n = 24). In mice treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies (Abs), sPD-L1 levels and localization of Abs were examined by ELISA and immunohistochemistry, respectively. Results:sPD-L1 was detected with higher frequency in GC patients than in NSCLC patients, whereas bsPD-L1 was detected with similar frequencies in GC and NSCLC patients. sPD-L1 levels were correlated with IL-1α, IL-1ß, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels, while bsPD-L1 levels were correlated with MMP13, MMP3, and IFN-γ levels. In NSCLC patients, anti-PD-L1, but not anti-PD-1, treatment increased sPD-L1, which was associated with irAE development, but not with clinical outcomes. In mice, trafficking of anti-PD-L1 Abs to lysosomes in F4/80+ macrophages resulted in sPD-L1 production, which was suppressed by treatment with lysosomal degradation inhibitor chloroquine and macrophage depletion. Conclusion: Anti-PD-L1-mediated lysosomal degradation induces sPD-L1 production, which can serve as an indicator to predict irAE development during anti-PD-L1 treatment.

Effects of Apatinib combined with Temozolomide on levels of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 in patients with drug-resistant recurrent glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effects of Apatinib combined with Temozolomide (TMZ) on the levels of Soluble PD-1 (sPD-1) and Soluble Programmed Death-1 Ligand (sPD-L1) in patients with drug-resistant recurrent Glioblastoma (GB). STUDY DESIGN: A total of 69 patients with recurrent GB from September 2020 to March 2022 were recruited and assigned to the control group (n = 34) and observation group (n = 35) according to different treatment options after tumor recurrence. The control group was treated with TMZ, and the observation group was treated with Apatinib combined with TMZ. Levels of sPD-1 and spd-l1, clinical efficacy, survival time and adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: General data including gender, age, body mass index, and combined diseases indicated no statistical significance between groups (p > 0.05). Before the intervention, sPD-1 and sPD-L1 levels were not significantly different in the two groups (p > 0.05). After interventions, levels of PD-1 and sPD-L1 levels decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The objective remission rate and clinical benefit rate of the observation group were higher and overall survival and progression-free survival were longer than those of the control group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in major adverse reactions among patients (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Apatinib combined with TMZ is safe and effective in the treatment of recurrent GB. The combined application of the two can reduce the levels of sPD-1 and sPD-L1, which has important clinical application value.

Combination of plasma MMPs and PD-1-binding soluble PD-L1 predicts recurrence in gastric cancer and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: The tumor microenvironment (TME) impacts the therapeutic efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). No liquid biomarkers are available to evaluate TME heterogeneity. Here, we investigated the clinical significance of PD-1-binding soluble PD-L1 (bsPD-L1) in gastric cancer (GC) patients and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Methods: We examined bsPD-L1, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and IFN-γ levels in plasma samples from GC patients (n = 117) prior to surgery and NSCLC patients (n = 72) prior to and 2 months after ICI treatment. We also examined extracellular matrix (ECM) integrity, PD-L1 expression, and T cell infiltration in tumor tissues from 25 GC patients by Elastica Masson-Goldner staining and immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 and CD3, respectively. Results: bsPD-L1 was detected in 17/117 GC patients and 16/72 NSCLC patients. bsPD-L1 showed strong or moderate correlations with plasma MMP13 or MMP3 levels, respectively, in both GC and NSCLC patients. bsPD-L1 expression in GC was associated with IFN-γ levels and intra-tumoral T cell infiltration, whereas MMP13 levels were associated with loss of ECM integrity, allowing tumor cells to access blood vessels. Plasma MMP3 and MMP13 levels were altered during ICI treatment. Combined bsPD-L1 and MMP status had higher predictive accuracy to identify two patient groups with favorable and poor prognosis than tumor PD-L1 expression: bsPD-L1+MMP13high in GC and bsPD-L1+(MMP3 and MMP13)increased in NSCLC were associated with poor prognosis, whereas bsPD-L1+MMP13low in GC and bsPD-L1+(MMP3 or MMP13)decreased in NSCLC were associated with favorable prognosis. Conclusion: Plasma bsPD-L1 and MMP13 levels indicate T cell response and loss of ECM integrity, respectively, in the TME. The combination of bsPD-L1 and MMPs may represent a non-invasive tool to predict recurrence in GC and the efficacy of ICIs in NSCLC.

Preclinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacology Study of RC98: A Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Monoclonal Antibody in Cynomolgus Monkeys.

INTRODUCTION: RC98 is the monoclonal antibody against Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1). Relevant reports have confirmed that the influence of PD-L1 expressed by tumor cells on antitumor CD8+ T cell responses is well characterized, but the impact of PD-L1 expressed by immune cells has not been well defined. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to design a Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacology (PK/PD) study of RC98 in normal cynomolgus monkeys to research the effect on the immune system. METHODS: RC98 and vehicle were administered to cynomolgus monkeys at 15 mg/kg via intravenous infusion once a week for 4 weeks to evaluate the relationship between PK and PD. The pharmacodynamic activity was measured by the PD-L1 receptor occupancy (RO) in CD3+ T cells, A T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR), and the concentration of soluble PD-L1. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic result showed that the exposure from the last administration was lower than that of the first administration, probably due to immunogenicity production. There was a strong correlation between systemic exposure and RO in CD3+ T cells but decreased RO levels after the last dose, which indirectly reflected the activation of T cells. The keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH)-induced TDAR in the RC98 group was higher than in the vehicle group. The concentration of soluble PD-L1 had increased feedback with RC98, and the concentration of soluble PD-L1 was maintained at a higher level after multiple doses than before dosing. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that the immune system was clearly activated. In addition, the non-clinical data could provide a basis for its efficacy evaluation in clinical trials.

Soluble PD-L1 predicts tumor response and immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) bring prognostic benefits to patients with malignancies. However, there is a substantial number of patients whose lesions are not improved by ICIs. In addition, ICIs may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which could lead to an unfavorable prognosis with fatal consequences. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the utility of circulating sPD-L1 (soluble programmed cell death 1 ligand 1) as a biomarker in patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 (programmed cell death 1 protein) antibodies. Sera from 31 consecutive patients were prospectively collected before and after anti-PD-1 antibody treatment and the serum level of sPD-L1 was evaluated. We found that high sPD-L1 levels before treatment were associated with better prognosis, and this association was observed only in patients with a low tumor burden. We also found that sPD-L1 levels were elevated in patients who developed severe irAEs after treatment, and the patients with severe irAEs had significantly higher fluctuations in sPD-L1 (delta sPD-L1) than those without severe irAEs. Our study suggests that serum sPD-L1 level is a useful biomarker to predict tumor response and irAE development in patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies.

[The circulating PD-L1: An emerging predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors response]. / Le taux circulant de PD-L1 : un biomarqueur émergent de réponse aux inhibiteurs de checkpoints immunitaires.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have recently become the standard of care for many metastatic solid tumors, with considerable improvements in patient prognosis. However, a non-negligible proportion of patients does not respond to this type of treatment, making it essential to identify predictive factors of this response in order to better adapt the therapy. Among the biomarkers that have been most extensively studied in recent years, tumor PD-L1 levels come out on top, with controversial results for predicting response to ICI. The determination of circulating PD-L1 (or soluble PD-L1) in peripheral blood seems to be an interesting emerging biomarker. Indeed, several studies have investigated its prognostic value, and/or its potential predictive value of response to immunotherapy, and it would appear that there is a correlation between the level of soluble PD-L1 and the level of tumor aggressiveness and therefore prognosis. Furthermore, the results suggest that higher PD-L1 levels are associated with a poorer response to immunotherapy, although this remains to be confirmed in large-scale studies.

Effects of Apatinib combined with Temozolomide on levels of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 in patients with drug-resistant recurrent glioblastoma

Abstract Objective This study aimed to explore the effects of Apatinib combined with Temozolomide (TMZ) on the levels of Soluble PD-1 (sPD-1) and Soluble Programmed Death-1 Ligand (sPD-L1) in patients with drug-resistant recurrent Glioblastoma (GB). Study design A total of 69 patients with recurrent GB from September 2020 to March 2022 were recruited and assigned to the control group (n = 34) and observation group (n = 35) according to different treatment options after tumor recurrence. The control group was treated with TMZ, and the observation group was treated with Apatinib combined with TMZ. Levels of sPD-1 and spd-l1, clinical efficacy, survival time and adverse reactions were observed and compared between the two groups. Results General data including gender, age, body mass index, and combined diseases indicated no statistical significance between groups (p > 0.05). Before the intervention, sPD-1 and sPD-L1 levels were not significantly different in the two groups (p > 0.05). After interventions, levels of PD-1 and sPD-L1 levels decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The objective remission rate and clinical benefit rate of the observation group were higher and overall survival and progression-free survival were longer than those of the control group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in major adverse reactions among patients (p > 0.05). Conclusions Apatinib combined with TMZ is safe and effective in the treatment of recurrent GB. The combined application of the two can reduce the levels of sPD-1 and sPD-L1, which has important clinical application value.

The combination of soluble forms of PD-1 and PD-L1 as a predictive marker of PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced cancers: a multicenter retrospective study.

Introduction: The clinical relevance of soluble forms of programmed cell death-1 (sPD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1) remains unclear. We here investigated the relation between the efficacy of PD-1 blockade and pretreatment plasma levels of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 across a broad range of cancer types. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 171 patients with advanced solid tumors who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy regardless of treatment line. The concentrations of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 were measured with a fully automated immunoassay (HISCL system). Results: The study subjects comprised patients with head and neck cancer (n = 50), urothelial cancer (n = 42), renal cell cancer (n = 37), gastric cancer (n = 20), esophageal cancer (n = 10), malignant pleural mesothelioma (n = 6), or microsatellite instability-high tumors (n = 6). High or low levels of sPD-1 or sPD-L1 were not significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) for PD-1 blockade in the entire study population. Comparison of treatment outcomes according to combinations of high or low sPD-1 and sPD-L1 levels, however, revealed that patients with low sPD-1 and high sPD-L1 concentrations had a significantly poorer PFS (HR of 1.79 [95% CI, 1.13-2.83], p = 0.01) and a tendency toward poorer OS (HR of 1.70 [95% CI, 0.99-2.91], p = 0.05) compared with all other patients. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the combination of low sPD-1 and high sPD-L1 levels is a potential negative biomarker for PD-1 blockade therapy.

Soluble PD-L1 changes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Introduction: Currently, first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, are utilized as monotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with high programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression (≧50%). Pre-treatment or post-treatment serum soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) has been identified as a potential biomarker for assessing ICI efficacy through fixed-point observations. However, existing studies on sPD-L1 changes have produced inconsistent results or have had sample sizes too small to detect clinically meaningful effect sizes. To elucidate the role of sPD-L1, we conducted a collaborative individual patient data meta-analysis of PD-1 inhibitor treatments. Methods: We conducted a thorough search of articles in PubMed via Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception to October 20, 2023. Trials were deemed eligible if they contained individual datasets for advanced NSCLC patients, including data on overall survival (OS)/progression-free survival (PFS), as well as pre- and post-treatment sPD-L1 levels after 3-4 cycles of PD-1 inhibitor treatments. Our analysis focused on patients who completed 3-4 cycles of PD-1 inhibitor treatments. The primary outcome measure was OS/PFS, and we assessed changes in sPD-L1 concentration pre- and post-treatment through ELISA analyses. Results: From our search, we identified a potential seven trials, encompassing 256 patients. Among these, two trials with 26 patients met the criteria for inclusion in our primary analyses. Over a median follow-up period of 10 months, pooled univariate analysis revealed that increases in sPD-L1 levels during PD-1 inhibitor treatment were not associated with OS (HR = 1.25; CI: 0.52-3.02)/PFS (HR = 1.42; CI: 0.61-3.30) when compared to cases with sPD-L1 decreases. Subgroup analyses indicated that the impact of sPD-L1 changes on overall mortality/progression-related mortality remained consistent regardless of gender, age, or the type of treatment (nivolumab or pembrolizumab). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that changes in sPD-L1 levels during PD-1 inhibitor treatment do not significantly influence the prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients, regardless of gender, age, or treatment type. Continuous monitoring of sPD-L1 may not offer significant advantages compared to fixed-point observations.

Corrigendum: Soluble PD-L1 changes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1308381.].

Lack of Association of Plasma Levels of Soluble Programmed Cell Death Protein 1, Programmed Death-Ligand 1, and CTLA-4 With Survival for Stage II to IIIA NSCLC After Complete Resection and Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

Introduction: Perioperative treatment in NSCLC has gained marked attention with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Such a paradigm shift has given us additional opportunities to evaluate potential biomarkers in patients with these curable disease stages. Methods: This study (WJOG12319LTR) was designed as a biomarker study to evaluate whether soluble immune markers were prognostic or predictive on relapse-free survival in patients with stage II to IIIA NSCLC who underwent complete resection and adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin plus S-1, which is an oral fluoropyrimidine formulation that consists of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil, or S-1 alone in the previous WJOG4107 study. Archived plasma samples were assayed for soluble (s) forms of programmed cell death protein 1 (sPD-1), programmed death-ligand 1(sPD-L1), and CTLA-4 (sCTLA-4) with the highly sensitive HISCL system. Using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curves were derived and optimal cutoff values were determined. Using the cutoff values, whether the marker was prognostic or predictive was assessed by survival analysis. Results: A total of 150 patients were included in the study. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristics analysis revealed that the area under the curves for sPD-1, sPD-L1, and sCTLA-4 were 0.54, 0.51, and 0.58, respectively. The survival analysis did not reject that hazard ratios were 1 in terms of the soluble immune marker and the treatment-marker interaction for all three markers. Conclusions: There was no proof that circulating concentrations of sPD-1, sPD-L1, and sCTLA-4 were prognostic or predictive factors of the outcome for adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection in patients with NSCLC.

The influence of plasma sPD-L1 concentration on the effectiveness of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

INTRODUCTION: PD-L1 (Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1) is currently the only recognised marker of response to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, this marker is not perfect. Soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) may be a novel predictor of immunotherapy efficacy in NSCLC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We enrolled 120 patients (median age 68 ± 6.81 years, 70 males and 50 females) with locally advanced (stage IIIB; 10 patients) or advanced (stage IV; 110 patients) NSCLC. PD-L1 expression in tumour cells was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 117 (97.5%) patients. The soluble PD-L1 concentration in plasma samples was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The response to immunotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), calculated from the start of immunotherapy, were assessed in 119 patients. RESULTS: Patients with disease control had significantly lower (p = 0.0006) concentrations of sPD-L1 in blood plasma than patients with progression during the first months of immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy Patients with ≥ 6 month progression-free survival had a significantly higher (p = 0.013) percentage of tumor cells with PD-L1 expression than patients with shorter PFS. Patients with ≥ 6 months OS had significantly lower (p = 0.0142) plasma sPD-L1 concentrations than those with shorter overall survival. The median PFS was significantly higher in patients with low sPD-L1 concentrations than in those with high concentrations of this protein (5.8 vs. 2.5 months, HR = 0.6021, p = 0.0156). Similarly, patients with low sPD-L1 levels had a significantly higher median overall survival than those with sPD-L1 levels above the median (16.5 vs. 7 months, HR = 0.5354, p = 0.0071). There was no significant correlation between the percentage of tumour cells expressing PD-L1 and the concentration of sPD-L1 in the blood plasma. CONCLUSION: High sPD-L1 concentration is a negative predictor of immunotherapy efficacy in patients with NSCLC. It is worthwhile to determine sPD-L1 concentration to predict the risk of resistance to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies with greater certainty.

The Possible Clinical Significance of a Decreased Serum Level of Soluble PD-L1 in Discoid Lupus Erythematosus, but Not in Subacute Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus-A Pilot Study.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune skin disease with various clinical forms, including the subtypes of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). The altered function of the programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis in CLE pathogenesis has been suggested. Here, the soluble forms of PD-1 (sPD-1) and PD-L1 (sPD-L1) were explored in untreated DLE and SCLE. Levels of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serums of 21 DLE, 18 SCLE, 13 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and 20 healthy controls (HCs). Differences between patient groups and HCs, and the association between clinical activity of skin symptoms and sPD-1/sPD-L1 levels were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U-test and Spearmann's correlation. Regarding sPD-1 levels, no statistically significant differences were found between DLE and SCLE groups, nor compared to HCs. As for sPD-L1, a significantly lower level was found in the DLE group compared to the SCLE and HC groups (p = 0.027 and p = 0.009, respectively). In SLE, significantly higher sPD-1 was found compared to HCs (p = 0.002). No association between skin symptom activity and sPD-1/sPD-L1 levels was found in CLE. Alterations of the inhibitory effect of sPD-L1 on T-cell activity might elucidate the differences between DLE and SCLE.

Soluble PD-L1 as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in resectable gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we compared programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in primary tissue samples and its soluble form (sPD-L1) concentration in matched preoperative plasma samples from gastric cancer patients to understand the relationship between tissue and plasma PD-L1 expression and to determine its diagnostic and prognostic value. METHODS: PD-L1 expression in tissue was assessed by immunohistochemistry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and sPD-L1 concentration in plasma was quantified by ELISA. The levels of the CD274 gene, which encodes for PD-L1 protein, were examined as part of bulk tissue RNA-sequencing analyses. Additionally, we evaluated the association between sPD-L1 levels and various laboratory parameters, disease characteristics, and patient outcomes. RESULTS: GC patients had significantly higher levels of sPD-L1 in their plasma (71.69 pg/mL) compared to healthy controls (35.34 pg/mL) (p < 0.0001). Moreover, sPD-L1 levels were significantly correlated with tissue PD-L1 protein, CD274 mRNA expression, larger tumor size, advanced tumor stage, and lymph node metastasis. Elevated sPD-L1 levels (> 103.5 ng/mL) were associated with poor overall survival (HR = 2.16, 95%CI 1.15-4.08, p = 0.017). Furthermore, intratumoral neutrophil and dendritic cell levels were directly correlated with plasma sPD-L1 concentration in the GC patients. CONCLUSIONS: sPD-L1 was readily measurable in GC patients, and its level was associated with GC tissue PD-L1 expression, greater inflammatory cell infiltration, disease progression, and survival. Thus, sPD-L1 may be a useful minimally invasive diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in GC patients.

Prognostic impact of soluble PD-L1 derived from tumor-associated macrophages in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells can be degraded to soluble form (sPD-L1) and enter circulation, however, the clinical significances of sPD-L1 in peripheral blood remains to be elucidated in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We monitored plasma sPD-L1 levels during perioperative periods and evaluated PD-L1-positive cells in tumor tissues in patients with operable NSCLC. Then the correlation between preoperative plasma sPD-L1 levels and relapse-free survival (RFS) was analyzed retrospectively. In patients who underwent radical surgery (n = 61), plasma sPD-L1 levels (median; 63.5 pg/mL) significantly increased 1 month after surgery (72.2 pg/mL, P < 0.001). The combined score of PD-L1-positive cells including tumor cells and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) was significantly associated with preoperative plasma sPD-L1 levels. In patients with high levels of preoperative plasma sPD-L1, the probability of 5-year RFS was significantly poor for patients with low PD-L1 expression intensity of tumor cells (tcPD-L1) compared with those with high tcPD-L1 (33.3% vs. 87.5%, respectively, P = 0.016; 95% CI, 0.013-0.964). In former group, PD-L1-positive TAMs were markedly infiltrating compared with those from latter group (246.4 vs. 76.6 counts/mm2, respectively, P = 0.003). In NSCLC, plasma sPD-L1 can reflect the accumulation of PD-L1-posotive TAMs, not just PD-L1-positive tumor cells. In patients with high levels of preoperative plasma sPD-L1, the prognoses after surgery depends on which PD-L1-positive cells, tumor cells or TAMs, are the primary source of the sPD-L1. Thus, measuring both plasma sPD-L1 levels and PD-L1 expression status of tumor cells and TAMs is of benefit for assessment of postoperative prognosis in operable NSCLC.

Soluble monomeric human programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibits the functions of activated T cells.

Introduction: The presence of soluble human programmed cell death-ligand 1 (shPD-L1) in the blood of patients with cancer has been reported to be negatively correlated with disease prognosis. However, little information exists about the mechanisms underlying high levels of shPD-L1 for promoting disease progression. Methods: In this study, we first analyzed the correlations between shPD-L1 and apoptosis of T cells in patients with cancer, then tested the effect of shPD-L1 on T-cell functions and the production of regulatory T cells. Results: We found that the apoptosis of human peripheral PD-1+CD4+ T cells was significantly elevated in patients with cancer compared with healthy donors and was positively correlated with circulating PD-L1 levels in patients with cancer. In vitro, monomeric shPD-L1 significantly inhibited the proliferation, cytokine secretion, and cancer cell-killing activity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) activated by either agonist antibodies or HATac (high-affinity T cell activation core)-NYE (NY-ESO-1 antigen). It also promoted CD4+ T cells to express forkhead family transcription factor 3 (FoxP3) for the conversion of induced T regulatory cells, which was more significant than that mediated by soluble human PD-L1 fusion protein (shPD-L1-Fc). Discussion: These results confirm that soluble PD-L1 could be a candidate for inhibiting the functions of activated T cells, promoting peripheral tolerance to tumor cells, and implicating in system tumor immune escape in addition to the tumor microenvironment. This is an important mechanism explaining the negative correlation between peripheral blood PD-L1 levels and cancer prognosis. Therefore, understanding the roles of hPD-L1 in peripheral blood will be helpful for the development of precision immunotherapy programs in treating various tumors.