Effect of Different Injury Morphology of the Endplate on Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a simplified classification scheme for endplate injury morphology based on 3D CT and to examine possible associations between endplate injury morphology and vertebral space and other variables such as type of fracture and disc degeneration in a group of patients with thoracolumbar fractures. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study. We collected patients with thoracolumbar fractures admitted from January 2015 to August 2020 and divided them into three groups based on the morphology of endplate injury (45 cases of mild endplate injury, 54 cases of moderate endplate injury, and 42 cases of severe endplate injury, SEI). Data of vertebral body and intervertebral space height and angle, the Pfirrmann grade, endplate healing morphology were collected during preoperative, postoperative, and long-term follow-up of patients in each group. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-squared test, and repeated measurement ANOVA were used to compare and analyze the influence of endplate injury morphology on patient prognosis. RESULTS: Most moderate injuries to the endplate (fissure-type injury) and severe injuries (irregular depression-type injury, Schmorl's node-type injury) resulted in significant disc degeneration in the long-term transition. This study also showed significant differences in the height of the anterior margin of the injured spine and the intervertebral space height index during this process. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that although the region of injury in endplate fissure-type injury is small preoperatively, it may be a major factor in leading to severe disc degeneration, loss of intervertebral height, and Cobb angle in the long term. The results of our study therefore may allow surgeons to predict the prognosis of patients with thoracolumbar fractures and guide their treatment.

Which adults aged 65 and older are at low-risk for cervical spine injuries after low-level falls?

OBJECTIVES: The population is aging and falls are a common reason for emergency department visits. Appropriate imaging in this population is important. The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of cervical spine injury and identify factors associated with cervical spine injuries in adults ≥ 65 years after low-level falls. METHODS: This was a pre-specified sub-study of a prospective observational cohort study of intracranial bleeding in emergency patients ≥ 65 years presenting after low-level falls. The primary outcome was cervical spine injury. The risk factors of interest were Glasgow coma scale (GCS) < 15, head injury, neck pain, age, and frailty defined as Clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 5. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the strength of association between risk factors and cervical spine injury. A descriptive analysis of absence of significant risk factors was performed to determine patients who may not require imaging. RESULTS: There were 4308 adults ≥ 65 who sustained low-level falls with mean age of 82.0 (standard deviation ± 8.8) years and 1538 (35.7%) were male; 23 [0.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-0.8%)] were diagnosed with cervical spine injuries. The adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs were 1.3 (0.5-3.2) for GCS < 15, 5.3 (1.7-26.7) for head injury, 13.0 (5.7-31.2) for new neck pain, 1.4 (1.0-1.8) for 5-year increase in age, and 1.1 (0.4-2.9) for frailty. Head injury or neck pain identified all 23 cervical spine injuries. Management was a rigid collar in 19/23 (82.6%) patients and none had surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In emergency patients ≥ 65 years presenting after a low-level fall, head injury, neck pain, and older age were associated with the diagnosis of cervical spine injury. There were no cervical spine injuries in those without head injury or neck pain. Patients with no head injury or neck pain may not require cervical spine imaging.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: La population vieillit et les chutes sont une raison courante pour les visites à l'urgence. Il est important d'avoir une imagerie appropriée dans cette population. Les objectifs de cette étude étaient d'estimer la prévalence des lésions de la colonne cervicale et d'identifier les facteurs associés aux lésions de la colonne cervicale chez les adultes de plus de 65 ans après des chutes de faible niveau. MéTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une sous-étude pré-spécifiée d'une étude prospective de cohorte observationnelle de saignements intracrâniens chez des patients d'urgence de plus de 65 ans se présentant après des chutes de faible niveau. Le résultat principal était une lésion de la colonne cervicale. Les facteurs de risque d'intérêt étaient l'échelle de coma de Glasgow (GCS)<15, les blessures à la tête, les douleurs au cou, l'âge et la fragilité définis comme l'échelle de fragilité clinique >5. La régression logistique multivariée a été utilisée pour mesurer la force de l'association entre les facteurs de risque et les lésions de la colonne cervicale. Une analyse descriptive de l'absence de facteurs de risque significatifs a été réalisée pour déterminer les patients qui ne nécessitent pas d'imagerie. RéSULTATS: Il y avait 4308 adultes de plus de 65 ans qui ont subi des chutes de faible intensité avec un âge moyen de 82.0 ans (écart-type 8.8) et 1538 ans (35.7 %) étaient des hommes; 23 (0.5 % (intervalle de confiance à 95 % 0.3­0.8 %) ont reçu un diagnostic de lésions du rachis cervical. Les rapports de cotes ajustés et les IC à 95 % étaient de 1.3 (0.5­3.2) pour les SCM<15, 5.3 (1.7­26.7) pour les blessures à la tête, 13.0 (5.7­31.2) pour les nouvelles douleurs au cou, 1.4 (1.0 ­ 1.8) pour l'augmentation de l'âge de cinq ans et 1.1 (0.4­2.9) pour la fragilité. Des blessures à la tête ou des douleurs au cou ont permis de déceler les 23 blessures à la colonne cervicale. La prise en charge était un collier rigide chez 19 patients sur 23 (82.6 %) et aucun n'a subi de chirurgie. CONCLUSIONS: Chez les patients d'urgence de plus de 65 ans se présentant après une chute de faible intensité, des blessures à la tête, des douleurs au cou et un âge plus avancé ont été associés au diagnostic de lésion de la colonne cervicale. Il n'y avait pas de blessures à la colonne cervicale chez les personnes sans blessure à la tête ou douleur au cou. Les patients sans blessure à la tête ou douleur au cou peuvent ne pas avoir besoin d'imagerie de la colonne cervicale.

Atypical Hangman's Fractures: An Institutional Study of 51 Patients With Atypical Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of C2.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Atypical hangman's fractures are associated with increased risk for neurologic injury due to involvement of the posterior cortex of the axis body. We present the largest single-center cohort of atypical hangman's fractures with the goal of guiding treatment decisions and outcomes based on fracture classification. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with atypical hangman's fractures treated at a single Level I trauma center between January 2010 and September 2023. 51 patients met inclusion criteria and demographic, treatment, and radiographic data were recorded and compared across the Type I and II fracture groups. RESULTS: Final treatment modalities varied significantly between the groups (P < 0.01), with hard cervical collar and invasive halo immobilization being the most prevalent treatments for fracture Types I and II respectively. One Type I fracture patient and four Type II fracture patients failed non-operative treatment, requiring surgery. Across both groups, posterior cervical fusion (73%) was the most common surgical approach. Median length of stay varied significantly between the two fracture groups (2.0 (1.0-7.0) vs 5.0 (3.0-8.0) days; P = 0.01). Irrespective of fracture type, longer hospital length of stay was associated with increased patient age (IRR = 1.02; P < 0.01), non-white race (IRR = 2.47; P = 0.01), injury caused by MVC (IRR = 1.93; P < 0.01), and the presence of non-spine orthopedic injuries (IRR = 1.72; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: While atypical Type I hangman's fractures may be managed effectively non-operatively with a hard cervical collar, atypical Type II fractures managed with a hard cervical collar are at greater risk of requiring subsequent surgical intervention.

Thoracolumbar injuries: operative treatment: indications, techniques, timing and implant removal. Current practice.

The operative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures is a rapidly evolving improvement in the care of patients with this injury after trauma. This article describes the different techniques and principles. Considerations and methods of treatment are scientifically addressed and illustrated according to the classification and severity of the fracture pattern. The use of computer navigation and optimisation of minimally invasive techniques is inevitable. The timing of surgery as well the removal of the material after fracture healing are also discussed. The operative treatment of spinal fractures is emerging and there is still much more knowledge to gain.

Prehospital guidelines on in-water traumatic spinal injuries for lifeguards and prehospital emergency medical services: an international Delphi consensus study.

BACKGROUND: Trauma guidelines on spinal motion restriction (SMR) have changed drastically in recent years. An international group of experts explored whether consensus could be reached and if guidelines on SMR performed by trained lifeguards and prehospital EMS following in-water traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) should also be changed. METHODS: An international three-round Delphi process was conducted from October 2022 to November 2023. In Delphi round one, brainstorming resulted in an exhaustive list of recommendations for handling patients with suspected in-water TSCI. The list was also used to construct a preliminary flowchart for in-water SMR. In Delphi round two, three levels of agreement for each recommendation and the flowchart were established. Recommendations with strong consensus (≥ 85% agreement) underwent minor revisions and entered round three; recommendations with moderate consensus (75-85% agreement) underwent major revisions in two consecutive phases; and recommendations with weak consensus (< 75% agreement) were excluded. In Delphi round 3, the level of consensus for each of the final recommendations and each of the routes in the flowchart was tested using the same procedure as in Delphi round 2. RESULTS: Twenty-four experts participated in Delphi round one. The response rates for Delphi rounds two and three were 92% and 88%, respectively. The study resulted in 25 recommendations and one flowchart with four flowchart paths; 24 recommendations received strong consensus (≥ 85%), and one recommendation received moderate consensus (81%). Each of the four paths in the flowchart received strong consensus (90-95%). The integral flowchart received strong consensus (93%). CONCLUSIONS: This study produced expert consensus on 25 recommendations and a flowchart on handling patients with suspected in-water TSCI by trained lifeguards and prehospital EMS. These results provide clear and simple guidelines on SMR, which can standardise training and guidelines on SMR performed by trained lifeguards or prehospital EMS.

Streamlining the Journey of Research Into Clinical Practice: Making Your Patients and Practice Flourish Optimizing Management and Minimizing Risk of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures - Perspectives of the AO Spine KF Trauma and Infection Group Key Opinion Leaders.

STUDY DESIGN: Literature review with clinical recommendations. OBJECTIVE: To highlight important studies about osteoporotic spinal fractures (OF) that may be integrated into clinical practice based on the assessment of the AO Spine KF Trauma and Infection group key opinion leaders. METHODS: 4 important studies about OF that may affect current clinical practice of spinal surgeons were selected and reviewed with the aim of providing clinical recommendations to streamline the journey of research into clinical practice. Recommendations were graded as strong or conditional following the GRADE methodology. RESULTS: 4 studies were selected. Article 1: a validation of the Osteoporotic Fracture (OF)-score to treat OF fractures. Conditional recommendation to incorporate the OF score in the management of fractures to improve clinical results. Article 2: a randomized multicenter study comparing romosozumab/alendronate vs alendronate to decrease the incidence of new vertebral fractures. Strong recommendation that the group receiving romosozumab/alendronate had a decreased risk of new OF when compared with the alendronate only group only. Article 3: a systematic literature review of spinal orthoses in the management of. Conditional recommendation to prescribe a spinal orthosis to decrease pain and improve quality of life. Article 4: post-traumatic deformity after OF. A conditional recommendation that middle column injury and pre-injury use of steroids may lead to high risk of post-traumatic deformity after OF. CONCLUSIONS: Management of patients with OF is still complex and challenging. This review provides some recommendations that may help surgeons to better manage these patients and improve their clinical practice.

[Translated article] Diagnostic imaging in patients with vertebral compression fractures.

Vertebral compression fractures by osteoporosis (OVF) is usually a diagnostic problem and coincides on the age group of metastatic vertebral compression fractures (MVF). Although radiography is the first diagnostic technique, generally is not accurate for depicting demineralization and soft tissue lesions. Magnetic resonance (MRI) is the diagnostic choice. The most relevant signs are intravertebral fluid collection or fluid signal, other vertebral deformities without oedema and older age. Among the most relevant findings for diagnosis MVF are soft tissue mass and pedicle intensity signal asymmetries. However, reproducibility of these findings in clinical practice is moderate.

Epidemiological characteristics of traumatic spinal fractures among the elderly in China.

The exploration of traumatic spinal fractures (TSFs) within the senior demographic has not been thoroughly scrutinized, particularly with respect to variations across genders, age groups, seasonal periods, and causative factors. This retrospective analysis aimed to dissect differences in the prevalence and characteristics of TSFs among the elderly, factoring in gender, age, seasonal timing, and causation. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical and imaging records of 1,415 patients, all aged 60 years or older, who were diagnosed with TSFs from 2013 to 2019. This study categorized the data by gender, age groups (60-70, 70-80, and 80 years or older), seasons, and the cause of injuries, including road traffic crashes (RTCs), falls from low heights (LHF), falls from high heights (HHF), and injuries incurred during everyday activities and agricultural labor (DFI). Male patients exhibited notably higher incidences of RTCs, high-height falls (HHFs), outdoor incidents, comas post-injury, fractures of the lower limbs (LLFs), pelvic fractures (PFs), rib fractures (RFs), intra-thoracic injuries (ITIs), intra-abdominal injuries (IAIs), cervical fractures, and spinal cord injuries (SCIs). With advancing age, there was a marked decline in occurrences of RTCs, HHFs, outdoor incidents, RFs, craniocerebral injuries (CCIs), ITIs, cervical fractures, and SCIs, while the incidences of DFIs, indoor incidents, and thoracic and lumbar (T + L) fractures notably increased. During autumn, LLF occurrences were significantly reduced, whereas the winter season saw an increase in thoracic fractures. Spring time was associated with a higher frequency of lumbar fractures and noncontiguous spinal fractures (NSFs). Significant distinctions were observed in the age distribution, injury circumstances, associated injuries, and SCIs between high-energy impacts (RTCs and HHFs) and low-energy traumas (LHFs and DFIs). In the elderly demographic, TSFs exhibited discernible distinctions based on gender, age, seasonal variations, and etiological factors, impacting the nature and circumstances of injuries, associated traumas, complications, fracture sites, and the occurrence of SCIs.

C1-C2 Transarticular Anterior Fixation for the Treatment of Atlantoaxial Traumatic Dislocation: A Clinical Case.

Fractures of the odontoid apophysis are one of the most frequent lesions in the elderly population, and an increasingly preponderant problem with the progressive aging of the world population. In the present work, we report a clinical case of an 88-year-old male patient who suffered a fall resulting in a type-II fracture of the odontoid apophysis on the Anderson-D'Alonzo classification. Given the age and comorbidities of the patient, we decided to perform osteosynthesis of the fracture through anterior fixation with a transarticular screw in combination with fixation with an odontoid screw. This technique enables the necessary stability for the consolidation of Anderson-D'Alonzo's type II odontoid apophysis fracture, with the advantage of the lower levels of dissection of the cervical extensor musculature and hemorrhage resulting from this aggression when compared with the posterior approach; moreover, it is a readily-available technique that yields clear benefits in the treatment of this pathology in the geriatric population.

Accuracy of an artificial intelligence algorithm for detecting moderate-to-severe vertebral compression fractures on abdominal and thoracic computed tomography scans.

Objective: To describe the accuracy of HealthVCF, a software product that uses artificial intelligence, in the detection of incidental moderate-to-severe vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) on chest and abdominal computed tomography scans. Materials and Methods: We included a consecutive sample of 899 chest and abdominal computed tomography scans of patients 51-99 years of age. Scans were retrospectively evaluated by the software and by two specialists in musculoskeletal imaging for the presence of VCFs with vertebral body height loss > 25%. We compared the software analysis with that of a general radiologist, using the evaluation of the two specialists as the reference. Results: The software showed a diagnostic accuracy of 89.6% (95% CI: 87.4-91.5%) for moderate-to-severe VCFs, with a sensitivity of 73.8%, a specificity of 92.7%, and a negative predictive value of 94.8%. Among the 145 positive scans detected by the software, the general radiologist failed to report the fractures in 62 (42.8%), and the algorithm detected additional fractures in 38 of those scans. Conclusion: The software has good accuracy for the detection of moderate-to-severe VCFs, with high specificity, and can increase the opportunistic detection rate of VCFs by radiologists who do not specialize in musculoskeletal imaging.

Objetivo: Descrever a acurácia do software HealthVCF na detecção incidental de fraturas compressivas de corpos vertebrais moderadas a graves em exames de tomografia computadorizada do tórax e abdome. Materiais e Métodos: Foram incluídos 899 exames consecutivos de pacientes com idades entre 51 e 99 anos. As imagens foram retrospectivamente avaliadas pelo software e por dois radiologistas especializados em musculoesquelético que investigaram fraturas compressivas de corpos vertebrais com perda da altura somática > 25%. A análise comparativa foi realizada entre o software e um radiologista geral, usando a avaliação do especialista como referência. Resultados: O software apresentou uma acurácia de 89,6% (IC 95%: 87,4­91,5%) para fraturas compressivas moderadas a graves, com sensibilidade de 73,8%, especificidade de 92,7% e valor preditivo negativo de 94,8%. Entre as 145 tomografias positivas detectadas pelo software, o radiologista geral deixou de relatar as fraturas em 62 (42,8%) e o algoritmo detectou fraturas adicionais em 38 dessas tomografias. Conclusão: O software possui boa acurácia na detecção de fraturas compressivas moderadas a graves, com alta especificidade, podendo aumentar a taxa de detecção oportunística dessas fraturas por radiologistas não especializados em musculoesquelético.