The Influence of Wait Time on Surgical Outcomes in Elective Lumbar Degenerative Spine Conditions: A Retrospective Multicentre Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The impact of delayed access to operative treatment on patient reported outcomes (PROs) for lumbar degenerative conditions remains unclear. The goal of this study is to evaluate the association between wait times for elective lumbar spine surgery and post-operative PROs. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of patients surgically treated for a degenerative lumbar conditions. Wait times were calculated from primary care referral to surgery, termed the cumulative wait time (CWT). CWT benchmarks were created at 3, 6 and 12 months. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to measure the associations between CWT and meeting the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 2281 patients were included in the study cohort. The average age was 59.4 years (SD 14.8). The median CWT was 43.1 weeks (IQR 17.8 - 60.6) and only 30.9% had treatment within 6 months. Patients were more likely achieve the MCID for the ODI at 12 months post-operatively if they had surgery within 6 months of referral from primary care (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.11 - 1.34). This relationship was also found at a benchmark CWT time of 3 months (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.15 - 1.54) though not at 12 months (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.97 - 1.20). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received operative treatment within a 3- and 6-month benchmark between referral and surgery were more likely to experience noticeable improvement in post-operative function.

Full-endoscopic Spine Surgery for the Treatment of Lumbar Ligamentous Flavum Hematoma.

Lumbar ligamentous flavum hematoma (LFH) is a relatively rare pathology, and it is difficult to differentiate it from other cystic lesions. Full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS), an excellent approach for clear and magnified operative visual field since it allows saline irrigation and minimizes destruction of surrounding tissues, has been applied to the treatment. This study aims to present a case series of patients with lumbar LFH treated by FESS.This case series consists of 17 lumbar LFH cases treated by FESS between May 2018 and November 2021 at a single institution. Patient background and operative data were collected from their medical records. The numerical rating scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively.Elderly men tend to suffer from lumbar LFH at the L4/5 vertebral level. Discontinuity with facet joint was confirmed under endoscopic visualization in all 17 cases. Blood clots were also observed in all cases under endoscope. The mean operative time was 68.6 min without complication. The patients were discharged at average 1.4 days after FESS with significant improvement of NRS score (P < 0.001). ODI and EQ-5D scores 2-year postoperatively statistically improved (P < 0.001), and there was no recurrence during followup period.The operative outcomes of lumbar LFH treated by FESS were satisfactory. FESS excels not only in the diagnosis but also in the treatment of lumbar LFH.

Assessing a revised-risk analysis index for morbidity and mortality after spine surgery for metastatic spinal tumors.

BACKGROUND: Risk Analysis Index (RAI) has been increasingly used to assess surgical frailty in various procedures, but its effectiveness in predicting mortality or in-patient hospital outcomes for spine surgery in metastatic disease remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive values of the revised RAI (RAI-rev), the modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5), and advanced age for extended length of stay, 30-day readmission, complications, and mortality among patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2012-2022 ACS NSQIP database to identify adult patients who underwent spinal surgery for metastatic spinal pathologies. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and multivariable analyses, we compared the discriminative thresholds and independent associations of RAI-rev, mFI-5, and greater patient age with extended length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications, hospital readmission, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1,796 patients were identified, of which 1,116 (62.1%) were male and 1,008 (70.7%) were non-Hispanic White. RAI-rev identified 1,291 (71.9%) frail and 208 (11.6%) very frail patients, while mFI-5 identified 272 (15.1%) frail and 49 (2.7%) very frail patients. In the ROC analysis for extended LOS, both RAI-rev and mFI-5 showed modest predictive capabilities with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.5477 and 0.5329, respectively, and no significant difference in their predictive abilities (p = 0.446). When compared to age, RAI-rev demonstrated superior prediction (p = 0.015). With respect to predicting 30-day readmission, no significant difference was observed between RAI-rev and mFI-5 (AUC 0.5394 l respectively, p = 0.354). However, RAI-rev outperformed age (p = 0.001). When assessing the risk of 30-day complications, RAI-rev significantly outperformed mFI-5 (AUC: 0.6016 and 0.5542 respectively, p = 0.022) but not age. Notably, RAI-rev demonstrated superior ability for predicting 30-day mortality compared to mFI-5 and age (AUC: 0.6541, 0.5652, and 0.5515 respectively, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed RAI-rev as a significant predictor of extended LOS [aOR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.13-3.38, p = 0.016] and 30-day mortality [aOR: 5.27, 95% CI: 1.73-16.06, p = 0.003] for very frail patients. Similarly, the RAI-rev significantly predicted 30-day complications for frail [aOR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.21-5.72, p = 0.015] and very frail [aOR: 3.69, 95% CI: 1.60-8.51, p = 0.002] patients. However, the RAI did not significantly predict 30-day readmission [Very Frail aOR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.75-3.07, p = 0.245; Frail aOR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.79-2.68, p = 0.225]. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the utility of RAI-rev in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic spinal pathologies. Particularly, the superiority that RAI-rev has in predicting 30-day mortality may have significant implications in multidisciplinary decision making.

High-Definition 4K-3D Exoscope in Spine Surgery: A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature.

Background and Objectives: Binocular optical microscopy (OM) paved the way for a new era in brain and spine neurosurgery fields with the introduction of microsurgery. Despite its enormous contribution to modern neurosurgery, OM presents some intrinsic limitations that surgeons need to face during procedures such as prolonged non-ergonomic positions and decreased vision quality to the assistant eyepiece. To overcome these limitations, in recent years, new operative tools have been introduced, such as exoscopes. Here, we present our experience with exoscopes in spine surgery. Materials and Methods: In the period between January 2022 and December 2023, we gradually implemented the use of a high-definition 4K-3D exoscope (ORBEYETM, Olympus, Japan) in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Results: A total of 243 patients underwent spine surgery with exoscope magnification (47 intradural tumors, 99 lumbar degenerative cases, 79 cervical degenerative cases, 5 dorsal calcified disk herniations, 4 dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs), and 9 others). We compared this cohort with a similar cohort of patients operated in the same period using OM based on different endpoints: operating time, complication rate, and infection rate. We did not find any statistically significant difference in any of the endpoints between these two groups. Conclusions: In our experience, the exoscope provides a better resolution of spinal anatomy and higher quality real-time images of the surgery for the entire OR team and improves the ergonomic posture of both surgeons, without lengthening the operating time and without increasing the rate of adverse events. Prospective studies with a larger cohort of patients are needed to further validate these findings.

Challenges in Contemporary Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical, Technological, and Patient-Specific Issues.

Spine surgery has significantly progressed due to innovations in surgical techniques, technology, and a deeper understanding of spinal pathology. However, numerous challenges persist, complicating successful outcomes. Anatomical intricacies at transitional junctions demand precise surgical expertise to avoid complications. Technical challenges, such as underestimation of the density of fixed vertebrae, individual vertebral characteristics, and the angle of pedicle inclination, pose additional risks during surgery. Patient anatomical variability and prior surgeries add layers of difficulty, often necessitating thorough pre- and intraoperative planning. Technological challenges involve the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced visualization systems. AI offers predictive capabilities but is limited by the need for large, high-quality datasets and the "black box" nature of machine learning models, which complicates clinical decision making. Visualization technologies like augmented reality and robotic surgery enhance precision but come with operational and cost-related hurdles. Patient-specific challenges include managing postoperative complications such as adjacent segment disease, hardware failure, and neurological deficits. Effective patient outcome measurement is critical, yet existing metrics often fail to capture the full scope of patient experiences. Proper patient selection for procedures is essential to minimize risks and improve outcomes, but criteria can be inconsistent and complex. There is the need for continued technological innovation, improved patient-specific outcome measures, and enhanced surgical education through simulation-based training. Integrating AI in preoperative planning and developing comprehensive databases for spinal pathologies can aid in creating more accurate, generalizable models. A holistic approach that combines technological advancements with personalized patient care and ongoing education is essential for addressing these challenges and improving spine surgery outcomes.

Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intraoperative Image-Guided Navigation in Spine Surgery.

Navigation technologies have become essential in spine surgery over the last decade, offering precise procedures and minimizing risks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first bibliometric analysis on this topic, providing insights and trends on topics, authors, and journals. The study identifies and analyzes the 100 most cited articles related to navigation in spine surgery. A systematic search was performed in Scopus and Google Scholar to identify all articles related to navigation in spine surgery (38,057 articles). The 100 most cited were analyzed for citations, titles, abstracts, authors, affiliations, keywords, country and institute of origin, year of publication, and level of evidence. The search was conducted in October 2023. The 100 most cited articles were published between 1995 and 2019, with 2010 to 2019 being the most prolific decade (46%). The most cited article had 733 citations, and the paper with the most citations per year averaged 59.27 citations/year. The Spine Journal had the most articles (34%). The United States contributed the most articles (39%). Most publications were clinical research and reviews (94%), with an overall evidence grade of IV-V (63%). A positive trend was noted in the last decade for incorporating augmented reality. This bibliometric analysis offers valuable insights and trends in spine surgery navigation literature. The findings indicate that technological advancements have led to more articles with higher levels of evidence. These pivotal articles shape evidence-based medicine, future surgeons, and industry improvements in navigated spine surgery.

Skin Adhesive Tapes: An Effective Wound Closure Method for Percutaneous Vertebral Body Stenting.

Background Skin adhesive tapes (SATs) are hypoallergenic adhesive tapes commonly used for wound closure in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Vertebral body stenting (VBS) is a metallic balloon-expandable stent used to treat vertebral body fractures. Its balloon and stent deployment involves a larger stab incision and pedicle bore tract than PVP, increasing the risk of bleeding and wound complications. This study evaluated the outcome and complications of VBS wound closure with SAT and the reasons for conversion to conventional suture closure (SC). Material and methods A retrospective series of patients who underwent VBS from May 2019 to March 2021 were identified from review of computerized medical records. Data were collected for wound closure method, reason for SC, number of operative levels, postoperative wound complications of contact dermatitis, tension blisters, tape dislodgement, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, symptomatic hematoma and return to operating theater. The wounds were assessed for complete healing and cosmesis at outpatient follow-up visits. Results A total of 36 patients were identified. SAT closure was performed in 33 (91.6%) patients, while SC was performed in three (8.3%) patients. Unplanned conversion to SC was required in two (5.5%) patients due to continued intraoperative wound bleeding, while one (2.7%) patient had planned SC as part of a staged operation. Uneventful closures occurred in 32 (97.0%) of SAT closures. One (3%) SAT closure patient developed postoperative blood-soaked dressings and tape dislodgement, requiring reapplication of the SATs at the ward with uneventful recovery thereafter. No patient with SAT closure developed contact dermatitis, tension blisters, surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, symptomatic hematoma, or required return to theater. All SAT closure patients had complete wound healing at outpatient follow-up at six weeks. No SAT closure was found to be cosmetically unacceptable or required wound revision for any reason at up to one year postoperatively. Conclusion SATs are a safe and reliable means of wound closure for VBS. Conversion to SC due to continued intraoperative wound site bleeding is rarely required.

Mindfulness vs. Physiotherapy vs. Medical Therapy: Uncovering the Best Postoperative Recovery Method for Low Back Surgery Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Single Institution's Experience.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mindfulness therapy compared to traditional physiotherapy and usual care in alleviating postoperative pain and improving functional outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing lumbar decompression and fusion (LDF) who presented persistent low back pain after surgery were prospectively followed for one year. They were randomly divided into three groups: mindfulness therapy, physiotherapy, and medical therapy. The primary outcome was the improvement of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score postoperatively and at six months follow-up. RESULTS: Both mindfulness and physiotherapy groups showed significant improvement in ODI scores compared to the control group, with mean variations of 10.6 and 11.6 points, respectively, versus 4.9 points in the control group. There was no significant difference between mindfulness and physiotherapy (p = 0.52), but both were superior to medical care (p < 0.0001 for physiotherapy and p = 0.0007 for mindfulness). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that mindfulness therapy is more effective than usual care in improving postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. In our cohort, its efficacy was comparable to that of physiotherapy, making it a viable alternative, especially when access to healthcare services is restricted, as seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research should validate the findings of this study and examine the long-term effects on surgical patient populations.

Specific plasma biomarker signatures associated with patients undergoing surgery for back pain.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) affects numerous people worldwide. The role of inflammation is increasingly recognized but remains incompletely resolved. Peripheral molecules could access neovascularized degenerated discs and contribute to the ongoing pathology. PURPOSE: To assess a large array of plasma molecules in patients with IDD to identify biomarkers associated with specific spinal pathologies and prognostic biomarkers for the surgery outcome. DESIGN: Prospective observational study combining clinical data and plasma measures. PATIENT SAMPLE: Plasma samples were collected just before surgery. Extensive clinical data (age, sex, smoking status, Modic score, glomerular filtration rate, etc.) were extracted from clinical files from 83 patients with IDD undergoing spine surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Recovery two months post-surgery as assessed by the treating neurosurgeon. METHODS: Over 40 biological molecules were measured in patients' plasma using multiplex assays. Statistical analyses were performed to identify associations between biological and clinical characteristics (age, sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), smoking status, herniated disc, radiculopathy, myelopathy, stenosis, MODIC score, etc.) and plasma levels of biological molecules. RESULTS: Plasma levels of Neurofilament Light chain (NfL) were significantly elevated in patients with myelopathy and spinal stenosis compared to herniated disc. Plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), Neurofilament Light chain (NfL), and Serum Amyloid A (SAA) were negatively associated, while CCL22 levels were positively associated with an efficient recovery two months post-surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that CRP and CCL22 plasma levels combined with the age of the IDD patient can predict the two-month post-surgery recovery (Area Under the Curve (AUC) = 0.883). Moreover, NfL could become a valuable monitoring tool for patients with spinal cord injuries.

Three-dimensional Printing in Spinal Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Carry out an update and systematic review on the use of three-dimensional printing (3DP) in spinal surgery. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database in March 2024. "Spine surgery" and "3d printing" were the search terms. Only articles published from 2014 to 2024 and clinical trails were selected for inclusion. Non-English or Spanish articles were excluded. This review complied with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline. RESULTS: Ten articles were included after screening and evaluation. The majority of the studied diseases were deformities (n = 3) and traumas (n = 3), followed by degenerative diseases (n = 2). Two articles dealt with surgical techniques. Six articles studied the creation of personalized guides for inserting screws; two were about education, one related to educating patients about their disease and the other to teaching residents surgical techniques; two other articles addressed surgical planning, where biomodels were printed to study anatomy and surgical programming. CONCLUSIONS: 3D printing is one of the most-used tools in spine surgeries, but there are still randomized articles available on the subject. Using this technology seems to have a positive effect on patient education regarding their disease and surgical planning.

Hybrid-3D robotic suite in spine and trauma surgery - experiences in 210 patients.

BACKGROUND: In modern Hybrid ORs, the synergies of navigation and robotics are assumed to contribute to the optimisation of the treatment in trauma, orthopaedic and spine surgery. Despite promising evidence in the area of navigation and robotics, previous publications have not definitively proven the potential benefits. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the potential benefit and clinical outcome of patients treated in a fully equipped 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR. METHODS: Prospective data was collected (March 2022- March 2024) after implementation of a fully equipped 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR ("Robotic Suite") in the authors level 1 trauma centre. The OR includes a navigation unit, a cone beam CT (CBCT), a robotic arm and mixed reality glasses. Surgeries with different indications of the spine, the pelvis (pelvic ring and acetabulum) and the extremities were performed. Spinal and non-spinal screws were inserted. The collected data was analysed retrospectively. Pedicle screw accuracy was graded according to the Gertzbein and Robbins (GR) classification. RESULTS: A total of n = 210 patients (118 m:92f) were treated in our 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR, with 1171 screws inserted. Among these patients, 23 patients (11.0%) arrived at the hospital via the trauma room with an average Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 25.7. There were 1035 (88.4%) spinal screws inserted at an accuracy rate of 98.7% (CI95%: 98.1-99.4%; 911 GR-A & 111 GR-B screws). The number of non-spinal screws were 136 (11.6%) with an accuracy rate of 99.3% (CI95%: 97.8-100.0%; 135 correctly placed screws). This resulted in an overall accuracy rate of 98.8% (CI95%: 98.2-99.4%). The robotic arm was used in 152 cases (72.4%), minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was performed in 139 cases (66.2%) and wound infection occurred in 4 cases (1,9%). Overall, no revisions were needed. CONCLUSION: By extending the scope of application, this study showed that interventions in a fully equipped 3D-Navigation Hybrid OR can be successfully performed not only on the spine, but also on the pelvis and extremities. In trauma, orthopaedics and spinal surgery, navigation and robotics can be used to perform operations with a high degree of precision, increased safety, reduced radiation exposure for the OR-team and a very low complication rate.

Spinal Anesthesia for Awake Spine Surgery: A Paradigm Shift for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery.

Awake surgery has been applied for various surgical procedures with positive outcomes; however, in neurosurgery, the technique has traditionally been reserved for cranial surgery. Awake surgery for the spine (ASFS) is an alternative to general anesthesia (GA). As early studies report promising results, ASFS is progressively gaining more interest from spine surgeons. The history defining the range of adverse events facing patients undergoing GA has been well described. Adverse reactions resulting from GA can include postoperative nausea and vomiting, hemodynamic instability and cardiac complications, acute kidney injury or renal insufficiency, atelectasis, pulmonary emboli, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, or malignant hyperthermia and other direct drug reactions. For this reason, many high-risk populations who have typically been poor candidates under classifications for GA could benefit from the many advantages of ASFS. This narrative review will discuss the significant historical components related to ASFS, pertinent mechanisms of action, protocol overview, and the current trajectory of spine surgery with ASFS.

Early Occipitocervical Fusion Surgery in a Rare Clinical Encounter of Non-traumatic Atlantooccipital Subluxation (AOS) in Down Syndrome (Trisomy 21).

Subluxation of the atlantooccipital joint in patients with underlying Down syndrome is an extremely rare orthopedic condition. The condition can pose life-threatening risks if not promptly diagnosed and treated in the early stage. Yet, there have been documented cases of survival following atlantooccipital subluxation or dislocation. Atlantooccipital subluxation (AOS) is usually identified during screening in children with Down syndrome for atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS). Therefore, careful evaluation of the atlantooccipital joint from radiographs is also essential. It is crucial to emphasize the clinical significance of AOS. Here the authors present the case of a fifteen-year-old girl with underlying Down syndrome (trisomy 21) who survived a sudden onset of non-traumatic atlantooccipital subluxation with spinal cord compression. There are only a few cases were reported in patients with Down syndrome (trisomy 21) and only two cases with surgically treated atlantooccipital (C0C1) subluxation have been reported. This case is of particular interest as it represents the first reported case of atlantooccipital (C0C1) subluxation with spinal cord compression in Down syndrome that underwent occipitocervical fusion surgery during the acute presentation, resulting in significant neurological recovery. Her neurology symptoms and physical functions showed remarkable improvement post-surgery, and she is doing well at the one-year follow-up in the clinic. Early surgery during acute presentation in this case resulted in good surgical outcomes and improved patient quality of life.

Biomechanical modelling of indirect decompression in oblique lumbar intervertebral fusions - A finite element study.

BACKGROUND: Oblique lumbar intervertebral fusion aims to decompress spinal nerves via an interbody fusion cage, but the optimal surgical strategy, including implant selection for specific patient characteristics, remains unclear. A biomechanical model was developed to assess how pathophysiological characteristics and instrumentation impact spinal realignment, indirect decompression, and cage subsidence risk. METHODS: A finite element model of the L4-L5 segment was derived from a validated asymptomatic T1-S1 spine model. Five cases of grade I spondylolisthesis with normal or osteoporotic bone densities and initial disc heights of 4.3 to 8.3 mm were simulated. Oblique lumbar intervertebral fusion with cage heights of 10, 12, and 14 mm (12° lordosis) was examined. Postoperative changes in disc height, foraminal and spinal canal dimensions, segmental lordosis, and vertebral slip were assessed. Vertebral stresses and displacements under 10 Nm flexion and 400 N gravitational load were compared between stand-alone constructs and bilateral pedicle screw fixation using rods of 4.75, 5.5, and 6 mm diameters. FINDINGS: Oblique lumbar intervertebral fusion significantly improved postoperative disc height, foraminal and spinal canal dimensions, with the greatest enhancements observed with 14 mm cages. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation markedly reduced cortical endplate stresses and displacements compared to stand-alone constructs, with added benefits from larger rod diameters. Low bone density increased displacements by 63 %. INTERPRETATION: Thicker cages achieve better decompression but increase subsidence risk. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation with 6 mm rods minimizes endplate stresses and displacements, especially in osteoporotic cases. Future research will validate these findings and explore the model's potential for surgical planning.

Redefining Oswestry Disability Index success criteria to assess the effect of consecutive surgeries on lumbar spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Register studies have shown that chances of success after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) decrease with increasing numbers of previous operations. However, these studies presumed that success criteria remain constant with each consecutive spinal surgery. PURPOSE: We aimed to redefine success criteria specific for each consecutive surgery. Also, we assessed if fusion could be an effective procedure for LSS patients with previous decompression(s). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) from surgically treated LSS patients enrolled in The NORspine Register. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients operated for lumbar spinal stenosis. OUTCOME MEASURES: PROMs: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) percentage (%) change and Global Perceived Effect (GPE). METHODS: We categorized the LSS cohort by number of previous spine surgeries (none to ≥3). ROC analyses gave the most accurate cut-offs for ODI% change that corresponded to success, anchored by GPE, i.e., "much improved" and "completely recovered". Areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) indicated how well ODI discriminated between success and nonsuccess for each consecutive surgery: good (0.8-0.89) and excellent (0.9-0.99). We then calculated proportions of successfully treated patients by number of consecutive surgeries. We also analyzed whether fusion succeeded in patients with previous lumbar decompression(s). RESULTS: At 12 months, 8,919 (75%) responded; 6,961 (78%) had no previous LSS surgery, 1,338 (15%) had one, 417 (5%) had 2, and 203 (2%) had ≥3 previous surgeries. Preoperative ODI (95% CI) was 38.7 (38.2-39.1) for no previous surgery versus 49.4 (46.9-51.9) for patients with ≥3 previous surgeries. The postoperative ODIs (95% CI) were 21.9 (21.4-22.4) and 37.9 (34.9-40.8) for patients with no and ≥3 previous surgeries, respectively. For patients with no previous surgeries, ODI% change of 37.6% most accurately defined success (AUC [95% CI]=0.909 [0.903-0.916]), and 57.1% reported success. For patients with ≥3 previous surgeries, success was an ODI% change of 25.0% (AUC [95%CI]=0.930 [0.890-0.971]), and 46.3% reported success. Finally, 350 patients received fusion after previous decompression(s). ODI% change of 34.6% defined success (AUC [95% CI]=0.920 [0.890-0.949]). The proportion of successfully treated fusion patients was 47.7%, compared to 54.3% for the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We redefined ODI success criteria for patients with consecutive lumbar spinal stenosis surgeries. Our register study found the detrimental effect of consecutive surgeries on success rates to be less pessimistic than previously reported; fusion may be an effective option for LSS patients with previous decompression.

Evaluating laminar and lateral mass screw techniques in cervical injury management: A case series.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: The cervical spine is a dynamic structure that protects adjacent nervous innervation and maintains the range of motion (ROM) of the head and neck. Fractures in this area can lead to high mortality and morbidity, with bone fractures accounting for 56 % of cervical spinal cord injuries. This case series presents a series of cervical pathologies treated with posterior decompression and stabilization using laminar and lateral mass screw fixation. METHODS: This research is a case series of four patients treated with laminar and lateral mass screw technique. All patients received a surgical procedure, including posterior compression and stabilization, which included the use of a laminar and lateral mass screw. We followed the patient for 12 months. During follow up, outcome measures consisting of VAS, range of motion, neurological status, ODI Score, SF-12 Score and any complications related to the surgical procedure was recorded and calculated every 3 months. OUTCOMES: This series examines four distinct cases. The initial case pertained to a female patient, aged 72, who exhibited tetraparesis resulting from a burst fracture occurring in the C3-C5 vertebrae. The underlying etiology of this pathology is considered to be mineral bone disease associated with thyroid hormone imbalance due to thyroid cancer. The second instance was a 14-year-old child experiencing neck pain due to spondylitis tuberculosis in the C1-C2 region, accompanied by a retropharyngeal abscess and occipitocervical dissociation (OCD) with basilar invagination. The third example pertained to a patient who is 9 years old and presented with weakness in all extremities due to C1 fracture-dislocation. The fourth case was a 14-year-old patient who experienced a fall from a bunk bed. This patient was diagnosed with Traumatic Atlantoaxial dislocation with odontoid fracture Type II. All patients showed improved cervical curvature and range of motion with the advantages of reduction of intraoperative haemorrhage, as well as a decrease in postoperative rehabilitation duration. Overall, the data shows a general trend of improvement in VAS and ODI scores over time, with SF-12 scores stabilizing or slightly decreasing by 12 months post-operation. CONCLUSION: The use of a lateral mass screw for subaxial cervical injuries can be employed to manage cervical spine pathologies like fractures and infections, including spondylitis TB. However, more research is required to evaluate the long-term complications and success rates of this technique.

Discectomy vs. sequestrectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the primary causes of low back pain (LBP) and leg pain and may require surgical treatment in case of persistent pain and/or neurological disturbances. Conventional discectomy consists of the removal of the herniated fragment and additional material from the disc space, potentially accelerating degeneration and causing chronic LBP. Conversely, by resecting the herniated fragment only, sequestrectomy may improve postoperative LBP while increasing the risk of LDH recurrence. PURPOSE: To compare the effects of discectomy vs. sequestrectomy in terms of risk of reherniation, reoperation rate, complications, pain, satisfaction, and perioperative outcomes (operative time, blood loss, length of stay [LOS]). STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases was performed through May 1, 2024. Randomized and nonrandomized studies. The search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The RoB-2 and MINORS tools were utilized to assess the risk of bias in included studies. The quality of the evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE approach. RESULTS: A total of 16 articles (1 randomized controlled trial with 2 follow-up studies, 6 prospective studies, and 7 retrospective studies) published between 1991 and 2020 including 2009 patients were included for analysis. No significant differences were noted between discectomy vs. sequestrectomy in terms of risk of reherniation (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.26, p=0.42), reoperation rate (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.40, p=0.78), and complications (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.50 to 2.11). Although LBP (MD: -0.06, 95% CI: -0.39 to 0.28, p=0.74) and leg pain intensity (MD: 0.11, 95% CI: -0.21 to 0.42, p=0.50) was similar postoperatively, significantly better outcomes were reported by patients treated with sequestrectomy at 1 year (leg pain: MD: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.54) and 2 years (LBP: MD: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.34, p=0.02; leg pain: MD: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.31, p=0.0005). Sequestrectomy also resulted in a higher patient satisfaction (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.90, p=0.01) and shorter operative time (MD: 8.71, 95% CI: 1.66 to 15.75, p=0.02), while blood loss (MD: 0.18, 95% CI: -2.31 to 2.67, p=0.89) and LOS (MD: 0.02 days, 95% CI: -0.07 to 0.12, p=0.60) did not significantly differ compared to discectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current evidence, discectomy and sequestrectomy do not significantly differ in terms of risk of reherniation, reoperation rate, and postoperative complications. Patients treated with sequestrectomy may benefit from a marginally higher pain improvement, better satisfaction outcomes, and a shorter operative time, although the clinical relevance of these differences needs to be validated in larger, prospective, randomized studies.

Upper cervical epidural abscess with emphasis on diabetes as a risk factor: a case report.

BACKGROUND: An upper cervical spine epidural abscess (UCEA) is an epidural abscess that develops in the area between the occiput and the second cervical spine (axis). It is a rare diagnosis that carries the risk of instability of the atlantoaxial joint, and its management is not well-defined. It is known that the skin is the most common source of infection, and that diabetes mellitus (DM) is the most frequently reported risk factor. In this case, we present a patient diagnosed with UCEA, who achieved full neurological recovery postoperatively despite having neurological deficits for over five days prior to surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 56-year-old male patient with no history of any prior medical conditions, who presented with headache, neck pain, and weakness of the left side. The weakness started approximately three days prior to his presentation. His initial work up revealed hyperglycemia and elevated HbA1c of 86 mmol/mol (10%). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine revealed spondylitis of the C2 spine with an abscess at the craniocervical junction. He underwent a two-staged surgical approach: decompression and stabilisation. The patient achieved full motor recovery approximately three months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend screening for DM when a spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is diagnosed without readily identifiable risk factors. The optimal management in most SEA cases is surgical, which is particularly true for UCEA because of the risk of atlantoaxial joint instability. Full neurological recovery is possible even when the patient has been having deficits for more than five days.

Expectations in patients undergoing spine surgery are high and unmet.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Defining success in spine surgery lacks a standardized approach, and all existing concepts are based on registrations after surgery. PURPOSE: To examine patients' expectations before spine surgery assessed by a modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The authors asked: how do the expectations align with actual outcomes and can a patient's individual expectations be used as a success criterion in itself? STUDY DESIGN /SETTING: Prospective single-center study PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients scheduled for spine surgery at Akershus University Hospital (AHUS) were included in the study. They underwent one of three procedures: decompression for spinal stenosis, disc removal for lumbar disc herniation, or spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease. OUTCOME MEASURES: Modified and standard version of ODI and NRS (back and leg pain). METHODS: Preoperatively, the patients were given a modified ODI and NRS questionnaire in which they were asked to register the minimum acceptable functional impairment and pain they anticipated to have post-surgery. The patients' expectations were compared with three-and twelve-month follow-up data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) with ODI, NRS and Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale. We used simple descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 93 patients completed the pre-op questionnaire. Of these, 65 responded to the three-month follow-up and 53 at twelve-month follow-up. The mean (95%CI) ODI before surgery was 38.3 (34.2-42.3), the mean (95% CI) preoperative NRS back pain was 6.34 (5.81-6.88), and leg pain was 6.67 (6.08-7.26). The patients expected a mean (95%CI) ODI of 10.5 (7.5-13.5), mean (95%CI) NRS back pain of 2.5 (2.1-3.0), and NRS leg pain of 1.8 (1.5-2.2). The actual clinical outcome after twelve months were a mean (95%CI) ODI of 21.7 (17.0-26.5), NRS back pain of 3.4 (2.8-4.1), and leg pain of 2.8 (2.0-3.5). Only 12 (30.8%) patients achieved their expected ODI, while 26 (65.0%) classified themselves as significantly better according to GPE. CONCLUSIONS: Patients seem to have high expectations before spine surgery, and the expectations may exceed the clinical outcome. Only 30.8% had their ODI expectations met, but perceived benefit was higher. High expectations may be due to inadequate preoperative information and/or the unsuitability of ODI for capturing expectations.

Single-Level Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic versus Tubular Microdiscectomy: Comparing Surgical Outcomes and Opioid Consumption.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) microdiscectomy is an emerging minimally invasive surgery technique for treating symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. There is limited literature regarding outcomes. Here, we assess surgical outcomes and pain medication consumption for UBE vs. tubular lumbar microdiscectomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing primary, single-level UBE or tubular lumbar microdiscectomy surgery at a high-volume institution between 2018 and 2023. Variables of interest included operative time, complications and reoperations, as well as postoperative opioid and nonopioid pain medication consumption from discharge to 6 months. Opioid consumption was converted to morphine milligram equivalents. Standard statistical analyses were performed for comparative analyses. RESULTS: One hundred two patients-48 UBE and 54 tubular-were included. Average operative time (minutes) was higher for UBE patients (133.1 UBE vs. 86.6 tubular, P < 0.001), which trended downward over time but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07). There were no differences in complication or reoperation rates. Average daily MME was lower from discharge to 2-week follow-up in the UBE group (11.1 v. 14.1, P = 0.02), but were comparative thereafter. Nonopioid medication prescription was lower in the UBE cohort from discharge to 2 weeks (70.8% vs. 92.6%, P = 0.01) and 2 to 6 weeks (52.1% vs. 85.2%, P < 0.001), with no significant differences thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: UBE microdiscectomy is associated with longer operating times. Both opioid and nonopioid pain medication consumption were lower for UBE patients during the initial postoperative period, perhaps owing to the less-invasive nature of the surgery.