Review of respiratory anatomy adaptations in whales.

Whales (cetaceans, including dolphins and porpoises) are superbly adapted to life in water, but retain vestiges of their terrestrial ancestry, particularly the need to breathe air. Their respiratory tract exhibits many differences from their closest relatives, the terrestrial artiodactyls (even toed ungulates). In this review, we describe the anatomy of cetacean respiratory adaptions. These include protective features (e.g., preventing water incursions during breathing or swallowing, mitigating effects of pressure changes during diving/ascent) and unique functions (e.g., underwater sound production, regulating gas exchange during the dive cycle).

A Case Presentation in Management of Dysphagia and Dysarthria Caused due to Organophosphorus and Carbamate Insecticide Poisoning.

Organophosphorus and carbamate Insectiside is common in Asia-Pacific region consisting of 63% of the Global death. Organophosphorus and Carbamate poisoning can lead into different complications in the respiratory,digestive,neurological aspects and maybe fatal in certain cases.Besides medical management of the same,early rehabilitation is also required to manage different kinds of neurological aspects caused due to Organophosphorus and carbamate poisoning. The study was done to introspect the early intervention in swallowing and speech therapy in organophosphorus and carbamate poisoning individual,as a part of management besides medical intervention. A 19 years old female reported to the hospital with history of consuming organophos and carbamate insecticide with the intention of self harming causing cardiac arrest and as diagnosed as Flaccid Dysarthria with Oro-Pharyngeal Dysphagia when assessed with diagnostic tools respectively. Early speech and swallowing intervention was provided and introspected using MASA which showed improvement in scores during the therapeutic intervention and was statistically analysed using linear regression analysis. The result showed the improvement in MASA scores (the slope of the best fit) and proved that MASA scores improved significantly (slope = 14.3, p < 0.05) over time as the therapy sessions proceeded. The regression model was also significant (p < 0.05). The motor-speech therapeutic intervention provided improvement in the kinematics of oro-motor skills along with improvement in intelligibility of speech. This study concludes that early intervention in managing speech and swallowing abilities in Dysarthria and Dysphagia is helpful besides medical intervention in such cases.

Evaluating of Supraglottic Subunits in Swallowing Function in Supraglottic Cancer Patients Pre- and Post-Transoral Laser Microsurgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: This study aims to assess the impact of supraglottic cancer on swallowing functionality and its anatomical correlations before and after laser surgery. The study seeks to determine the extent of score changes post-surgery, pinpoint the most influential anatomical component in swallowing, predict post-surgery outcomes, and ascertain the effect on patients' quality of life. METHODS: Patients with supraglottic cancer and dysphagia were identified through stroboscopy and indirect laryngoscopy. Exclusion criteria encompassed a history of prior radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or distant metastases. Demographic data, tumor stage, comorbidities, risk factors, and treatment details were documented. Swallowing evaluation employed the translated EAT10 self-assessment questionnaire, administered before and after transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) at baseline and 6 months later. Additional treatments, rehabilitation duration, NG tube use, and post-surgery complications were recorded. RESULTS: At the six-month follow-up, 9 patients had EAT-10 scores ≥ 3, while 7 patients scored < 3. Five patients underwent post-TLM additional therapies, and 9 patients had neck dissections. Involved subunits were epiglottis (11 patients), arytenoid (5 patients), FVC (13 patients), and TVC (3 patients). Seven patients received dysphagia treatment. Analysis revealed significant associations between follow-up EAT-10 scores and dysphagia treatment (p = 0.04), smoking (p = 0.02), and FVC involvement (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Our study on supraglottic cancer treatment with transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) revealed variable EAT-10 scores after a six-month follow-up. Adjunctive therapies and neck dissections were administered to some patients. Significant associations were found between follow-up scores, dysphagia treatment, smoking history, and FVC involvement, highlighting the complex interplay between interventions and patient factors. Further research is needed for optimization.

Impact of Prehabilitation With Preoperative Swallowing Exercises on Postoperative Swallowing Morbidity in Oral Cavity Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background and Objective: Oral cancer surgery and the associated reconstructive procedures cause mechanical and neurological impairment of swallowing. Despite postoperative rehabilitation, functional impairment of swallowing remains a concern. This study is to investigate the potential benefits of prehabilitation with preoperative swallowing exercises to patients undergoing composite resections and compartmental tongue resections so that it results in better swallowing outcomes and improved quality of life after surgery. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients included in the study were randomized into an exercise and control group of 30 each. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity undergoing composite resection or compartmental tongue resections were included, and patients with severe trismus at presentation were excluded. Patients in the exercise group were instructed on a set of six active exercises to be followed strictly for a period of at least 1 week before surgery. Preoperative swallowing exercises comprised of evidence-based exercises targeting the muscle groups involved in swallowing. Postoperative swallowing rehabilitation was the same as that of the control group. Patients were assessed after 6 months of surgery. Outcomes were assessed both subjectively and objectively. Objective assessment was done by inexpensive, novel clinical methods of repetitive saliva swallow test (RSST), water swallow test (WST) and food swallow test (FST) to and graded using dysphagia severity scale (1-7). Results: Average oral intake scale (1-Oral solids, 2-Oral semisolids/easy to chew foods, 3-Oral liquids only and 4-Non-oral, orogastric tube dependent) assessed subjectively was significantly lower in exercise arm, and the control arm had a significantly higher OIS score. Exercise arm had higher number of patients in DSS scores of 5, 6 and 7. The control arm had a higher number of patients in DSS scores of 3 and 4. The differences between the two groups were found to be statistically significant taking into consideration the confounding factors of radiation, wound morbidity and tongue resections. Conclusion: Preoperative swallowing exercises have shown a positive impact on postoperative swallowing ability. This is the first randomized trial to assess the effect of PSE in postoperative oral cancer patients. Our exercise protocol needs standardization, and clinical objective method of dysphagia assessment requires further validation. However, prehabilitation with PSE has the potential to improve the quality of life in oral cancer patients.

Rumination Swallowing in Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy.

Patients with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) may develop swallowing disorders as the disease progresses. We detected a novel swallowing pattern in patients with LGMD, characterized by unique findings such as a rumination-like behavior, where food reaches the vallecula and piriform sinuses and then is regurgitated back into the oral cavity, re-chewed, and swallowed again. We termed this swallowing pattern "rumination swallowing." In this report, we describe a case of rumination swallowing, as observed through a videofluoroscopic (VF) examination, in a 56-year-old patient with LGMD.

Oral cavity obliteration is a novel predictor of functional outcomes after glossectomy reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES: The primary goal for reconstruction of oral tongue defects is to improve speech and swallowing. The purpose of this study is to present a new reconstructive metric that uses volume displacement to measure oral cavity obliteration and correlate this metric to outcomes of speech and swallowing. METHODS: 47 patients underwent resection and primary closure or free-tissue reconstruction of oral tongue defects. Oral cavity obliteration was measured using a novel oral volume assessment test (OVAT). Briefly, a latex balloon filled with pudding was placed on the patient's tongue and patients performed mouth closure to expel the pudding. Residual volumes represented dead space in the oral cavity and was measured by water displacement. These results were correlated with the Speech and Swallowing Assessment and Assessment of Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech (AIDS) instruments. RESULTS: The mean residual volume was 7.4 cc (range 3 - 20 cc; sd 4.5 cc). There was a correlation with lower residual volumes (better obliteration) with increasing AIDS efficiency ratio (R = 0.72, p < 0.001). A receiver operator curve was used to identify 10 cc of residual volume as the optimal cutoff point. Binary logistic regression using this cut point showed that residual volume significantly predicts normal nutritional mode (p < 0.001), ability to tolerate all liquids (p = 0.007), range of solids (p = 0.004), eating in public (p = 0.007), understandability (p < 0.001), and speaking in public (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Oral volume assessment test (OVAT) is a novel measure of residual volume (obliteration) that correlates with improved speech efficiency, intelligibility, speaking in public and swallowing outcomes.

Comparison of measurement of integrated relaxation pressure by esophageal manometry with analysis of swallowing sounds with artificial intelligence in patients with achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal motility disorders are mainly evaluated with high-resolution manometry (HRM) which is a time-consuming and uncomfortable procedure with potential adverse events. Acoustic characterization of the swallowing has the potential to be an alternative noninvasive procedure. METHODS: We compared the findings on HRM and swallowing sounds in 43 patients who were referred for evaluation of dysphagia. The sound analysis was done with empirical mode decomposition method and with artificial intelligence (AI) and the estimated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) from a two-layer neural network method was compared to measured IRP on HRM. The model then was tested in five patients. KEY RESULTS: IRP was estimated with high accuracy using the model developed with two-layer neural network method. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The analysis of acoustic properties of swallowing has the potential to be used for evaluation of esophageal motility disorders, this needs to be further evaluated in larger studies.

What am I looking at? Graduate student accuracy in identification of anatomic structures/landmarks on swallow imaging.

Speech-language pathologists need to accurately identify structures/landmarks on swallow imaging. Foundational learning begins in graduate training. This study aimed to determine graduate student accuracy at identifying anatomical structures/landmarks during swallow evaluations and to determine if accuracy was predicted by type of imaging, anatomical structure, case type (i.e., normal/abnormal). Researchers recruited first-year graduate speech-language pathology students. Each participant reviewed five static images from lateral radiographic swallow studies and five static images from endoscopic swallow studies across 10 cases. Participants identified key anatomic structures and landmarks by clicking on the structure/landmark within a web-based platform. Two experienced speech-language pathologists reviewed and coded participant responses for accuracy. Sixteen graduate speech-language pathology students participated in a within-subjects design. Overall participant accuracy in identification of structure/landmarks was 69% (range 46%-88%). Binomial logistic regression was performed to study the effects of anatomical structure, case type (i.e., normal/abnormal), and image type on likelihood of participant accuracy in identifying anatomical structures (X2(4) = 143.65, p < 0.001). Only anatomical structure was statistically significant (X2(4) = 187.729, p < 0.001). The model explained 23.2% (Nagelkerke's R squared) of the variance in accuracy and correctly classified 78.4% of cases. Sensitivity was 92.1%, specificity was 47.3%, positive predictive value was 79.84%, and negative predictive value was 72.50%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.754, 95% CI [0.716, 0.791]. Graduate student's ability to correctly identify structures/landmarks overall was lower than desired and accuracy varied per structure. Results have implications for improving graduate student training for identification of structures/landmarks on swallow imaging.

The effects of noninvasive respiratory support on swallowing physiology, airway protection, and respiratory-swallow pattern in adults: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: The use of noninvasive respiratory support- namely high flow of oxygen delivered via nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) - has been expanding in recent years. The physiologic mechanisms underlying each of these forms of support are generally well understood. In contrast, the effects on the sensorimotor mechanisms of swallowing movements, and of breathing and swallowing coordination ─ critical elements of airway protection and bolus clearance ─ remain unclear. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the existing evidence about the impact of noninvasive respiratory support on swallowing mechanics, airway protection, and respiratory-swallowing patterns in adults. METHODS: Six databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses) were searched using predetermined terms. Inclusion criteria were: 1) adult humans 2) use of noninvasive respiratory support, and 3) assessment of swallowing. RESULTS: We identified 8727 articles for screening; 15 met the inclusion criteria. Six studies assessed noninvasive respiratory support in healthy adults, and 9 assessed participants with heterogenous respiratory diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), acute respiratory failure, and chronic respiratory failure due to neuromuscular disease. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified NIH Quality Assessment Tool. In healthy adults, results demonstrated mixed effects of HFNC and CPAP on measures of swallowing function, airway protection, and respiratory swallowing patterns. Negative effects on respiratory-swallowing patterns were reported with NIV. In adults with heterogeneous respiratory diagnoses, six studies reported that HFNC, CPAP, or nasal NIV improved measures of swallowing and respiratory-swallowing patterns. HFNC has mixed effects on swallowing measures in ICU patients. NIV increased atypical respiratory-swallowing patterns in patients with stable COPD. CONCLUSIONS: Due to small sample sizes and the wide variation in study designs, the impact of noninvasive respiratory support on swallowing, airway protection, and respiratory-swallowing patterns cannot be confidently assessed based on the current evidence. Future studies using standardized, validated, and reproducible methods to assess the impact of noninvasive respiratory support on swallowing physiology and airway protection are warranted.

Agreement between patient-reported and clinician-rated speech and swallowing outcomes - Understanding the trend in post-operative oral cavity cancer patients.

AIM: To find the agreement between clinician-rated and patient-reported speech and swallowing outcomes in post-operative oral cavity cancer patients. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, a total of 53 post-operative oral cavity cancer patients were recruited. The Speech Handicap Index - Kannada (SHI-K) and the Dysphagia Handicap Index - Kannada (DHI-K) were used as the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and the Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability-Cancer (MASA-C) and Ali Yavar Jung National Institute of Speech & Hearing Disabilities (DIVYANGJAN) AYJNISHD(D)'s speech intelligibility rating scale were used as the clinician-rated scales to evaluate speech and swallowing status. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was poor, with a value of 0.480 between clinician-rated speech AYJNISHD(D)'s scale and patient-reported SHI-K scale. ICC was poor, with a value of 0.471 between clinician-rated swallowing MASA-C and patient-reported swallowing DHI-K. CONCLUSION: In our study, there was no agreement between patient-reported and clinician-rated speech and swallowing outcomes in post-operative oral cavity cancer patients. Incorporating PROMs into routine clinical practice is advisable, and clinicians need to balance PROMs with clinical and instrumental speech and swallowing assessments to ensure comprehensive care.

Preliminary Normative Reference Values of Validated FEES Scales in Healthy Young Adults.

OBJECTIVES: Limited normative reference data are available for validated outcomes of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). We aimed to examine healthy swallowing via FEES in community-dwelling healthy adults to derive a preliminary reference dataset of normative validated FEES outcomes to guide clinical interpretation and diagnostic decision-making. METHODS: Adults with no history of dysphagia-related disease underwent simultaneous videofluoroscopy and FEES imaging using a standardized 11-item bolus protocol. Trained raters performed duplicate, independent, blinded ratings of the New Zealand Secretion Scale (NZSS), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), and Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity-FEES (DIGEST-FEES) validated scales. Descriptive statistics were performed at the bolus (PAS) and participant level (NZSS, DIGEST-FEES). RESULTS: 361 swallows from 33 community-dwelling adults (36.6 ± 14.7 years old) were analyzed. In rank order, distribution profiles were: (1) NZSS: 95% normal (NZSS = 0), 5% abnormal (NZSS = 4); (2) Worst PAS: 73% safe (PAS 1-2, n = 24), 21% penetration above the true vocal folds (PAS 3, n = 7), 6% deep penetration to the true vocal folds (PAS = 5, n = 2); (3) DIGEST-FEES Safety Grades: 91% Grade 0 (normal, n = 30), 9% Grade 1 (mild impairment, n = 3); (4) DIGEST-FEES Efficiency Grades: 73% Grade 0 (normal, n = 24), 24% Grade 1 (mild impairment, n = 8), 3% Grade 2 (moderate impairment, n = 1). CONCLUSION: This preliminary healthy FEES dataset highlights variation in swallowing safety and efficiency and suggests careful interpretation of FEES outcomes to avoid over-pathologizing impairment. Future studies are warranted to obtain additional normative data in diverse populations to further understand normal variation in FEES outcomes to guide clinically meaningful diagnostic cut-points. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Prevalence and Management of Oral Intake Restrictions in Critically Ill Patients: Insights from a Multicenter Point Prevalence Study.

Oral intake restrictions due to dysphagia in the intensive care unit (ICU) can increase morbidity, mortality, and negatively impact quality of life. The current oral intake practice and clinical management strategies for addressing dysphagia in the ICU are not well-defined. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical practices surrounding oral intake restrictions due to dysphagia and its management strategies in the ICU. A multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional, 2-day point prevalence study was conducted in Japan. Relevant data on the clinical circumstances surrounding oral intake practice and the implementation of strategies to prevent dysphagia for patients admitted to the ICU on November 1, 2023, and December 1, 2023, were collected. The primary outcome was the prevalence of oral intake restrictions in patients, defined by a Functional Oral Intake Scale score of less than 7 among eligible patients for oral intake. Out of 326 participants, 187 were eligible for the final analysis after excluding 139 patients who were not eligible for oral intake, primarily due to tracheal intubation. Among those eligible, 69.0% (129/187) encountered oral intake restrictions. About 52.4% (98/187) of patients underwent swallowing screenings; 36.7% (36/98) of these were suspected of having dysphagia. Compensatory and behavioral swallowing rehabilitation were provided to 21.9% (41/187) and 10.6% (20/187) of patients, respectively, from ICU admission to the survey date. Only 27.4% (14/51) of post-extubation and 9.3% (3/32) of post-stroke patients received swallowing rehabilitation. Notably, no ICUs had dedicated speech and language therapists, and most (85.7%, 18/21) lacked established swallowing rehabilitation protocols. This 2-point prevalence survey study revealed that oral intake restrictions due to dysphagia are common in ICUs, but few patients are screened for swallowing issues or receive rehabilitation. More clinical studies are needed to develop effective protocols for identifying and managing dysphagia, including screenings and rehabilitation in the ICU.

Daily Challenges and Resources of Adults with Chronic Dysphagia: A Qualitative Investigation.

Identifying and addressing daily challenges and resources associated with chronic oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) is a pivotal, though still neglected component of person-centred care, yet overlooked in research studies. To investigate these dimensions, 25 Italian adults with chronic OD due to cancer or neurodegenerative diseases participated in semi-structured interviews, designed following a modified framework analysis approach. Two researchers independently transcribed and coded interviews, elaborated a working analytical framework, indexed and charted the data, solving discrepancies through negotiated agreement and discussion with a third researcher. Proportion agreement on extracted quotations was calculated. Overall, 457 quotations were extracted from the interviews (88% agreement). Daily challenges pertained to physical, practical, and social domains; most participants reported OD-related problems; almost half mentioned care needs and obstacles in using healthcare services. Concerning resources in OD management, most participants referred to problem-focused and meaning-focused coping strategies, personal capabilities, and support from family and healthcare services. Finally, almost half of the participants reported OD-related changes in life view and meaning. Findings suggest that adjusting to OD implies challenges and resource mobilization in different life domains. Future studies should longitudinally elucidate the dynamics of positive adjustment, to promote patient-centred OD care based on individually perceived needs and challenges, and to inform healthcare policies.

Evaluating the impact of transcranial electrical stimulation on post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), proposed as a potential therapy for post-stroke dysphagia, on swallowing function in stroke survivors. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant studies on TES for post-stroke dysphagia. Search results were reviewed following PRISMA guidelines, and the following data were extracted from included studies: study characteristics, demographics, and outcomes. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. Heterogeneity and effect sizes were analysed using I2 statistics and appropriate effects models. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration No. CRD42024578243). RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria (I2 = 0.0%). The meta-analysis indicated a significant improvement in dysphagia with TES (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13, 0.73). Subgroup analysis suggested that low-intensity TES was effective (SMD 0.46, 95% CI 0.09, 0.82), whereas high-intensity TES showed no significant improvement (SMD 0.37, 95% CI -0.17, 0.91). No publication bias was detected. CONCLUSION: TES may improve swallowing in stroke patients, with potential benefits from low-intensity protocols.

The relationship between oropharyngeal dysphagia and dehydration in older adults.

BACKGROUND: Relationship between dysphagia and dehydration has not been studied widely. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of dysphagia and dehydration in geriatric outpatient clinic, to evaluate the relationship between these two conditions. METHODS: The cross-sectional study included 1345 patients. Plasma osmolarity (Posm) was calculated using the following formula: [1.86 x (Na + K) + 1.15 x glucose + urea + 14]. Overt dehydration was defined as a calculated Posm of > 300 mmol/L. Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) score of ≥ 3 was accepted as dysphagia. Associations between dehydration and dysphagia was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean age was 78 ± 8 years, and 71% were females. Dysphagia was observed in 27% of patients. Dysphagia was associated with a higher number of drug exposure, dependency on basic activities of daily living and geriatric depression (p < 0.05). Overt dehydration was found in 29% of patients with dysphagia, and 21% of patients with no dysphagia (p = 0.002); and dysphagia was significantly associated with overt dehydration mmol/L (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.13-1.96, p = 0.005) after adjustments for age and sex. In another model, EAT-10 score was found as one of the independent predictors of overt dehydration (OR1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06, p = 0.38), along with diabetes mellitus (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.72-3.15, p < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (OR 3.05, 95% CI 2.24-4.15, p < 0.001), and MNA score (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-1.00, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: EAT-10 scale was independently associated with overt dehydration among older adults, as MNA score was. Correction of both dysphagia and malnutrition might improve overt dehydration to a better extent than correction either of these factors alone. Future studies are needed to test cause and effect relationships.

Long-Term Outcomes of Dysphagia Rehabilitation With an Adjustable Resistance Training Device in Laryngectomized Individuals.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated long-term outcomes of dysphagia rehabilitation with an adjustable resistance training device (Swallowing Exercise Aid, SEA2.0) in laryngectomized individuals. METHODS: Seventeen laryngectomized participants who participated in a Clinical Phase II Trial were reevaluated at T3 (approximately 6 months after T2), including an interview, PROMS, oral intake, and swallowing capacity. Results of T3 were compared with the earlier time points T0 (baseline), T1 (after 6 weeks of training), and T2 (after 8 weeks of rest). RESULTS: All outcomes at T3 remained improved compared to T0. Compared to findings at T2, participants reported some deterioration in swallowing at T3. Swallowing capacity and oral intake slightly decreased. Swallowing-related quality of life slightly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Benefits of swallowing rehabilitation with the SEA2.0 in laryngectomized individuals are still noticeable long term. The need for continued exercising to fully maintain improved function is likely, but the required intensity and extent should be determined in further research.

A Comprehensive Systematic Review on Functional Results, Speech and Swallowing Outcomes after Trans-Oral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer.

Background: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is nowadays considered a valuable minimally invasive approach to treat oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). The aim of this technique is to improve functional preservation and reduce morbidity with excellent oncologic outcomes compared to the traditional transoral approach and chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The purpose of this systematic review is to assess an exhaustive overview of functional outcomes of TORS for OPSCC by evaluating several parameters reported in the available literature, such as the prevalence and dependence of tracheotomy, feeding tubes (FTs) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), the length of hospitalization, swallowing scores, speech tests and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires. Methods: A systematic literature review has been performed following the PRISMA 2020 checklist statement. A computer-aided search was carried out using an extensive set of queries on the Embase/PubMed, Scopus and Web of Sciences databases relating to papers published from 2007 to 2024. Results: A total of 28 papers were systematically reviewed, reporting 1541 patients' data. The mean time of hospitalization was 6 days. A planned tracheotomy was performed in 8% of patients with a mean time of removal of 8 days. The prevalence and dependence of FT was 60% and 10%, respectively. Moreover, the presence of a high-stage T tumor with the contextual requirement of adjuvant therapies, the involvement of base tongues and the patient's age being >55 years increased the risk of requiring an FT and PEG. Swallowing and long-term QoL outcomes highlight the superiority of the TORS approach alone compared to TORS with adjuvant therapies. Conclusions: TORS presented various favorable functional outcomes compared to other surgical approaches and primary CRT. However, adjuvant therapies after TORS strongly reduced the advantage of the robotic procedure, thus suggesting that T1 and T2 tumors may benefit mainly from TORS alone.

Coordination of Pharyngeal and Esophageal Phases of Swallowing.

Although swallowing has been reviewed extensively, the coordination of the phases of swallowing have not. The phases are controlled by the brainstem, but peripheral factors help coordinate the phases. The occurrence, magnitude, and duration of esophageal phase depends upon peripheral feedback activated by the bolus. The esophageal phase does not occur without peripheral feedback from the esophagus. This feedback is mediated by esophageal slowly-adapting mucosal tension receptors through the recurrent and superior laryngeal nerves. A similar reflex mediated by the same peripheral pathway is the activation of swallowing by stimulation of the cervical esophagus. This reflex occurs primarily in human infants and animals, and this reflex may be important for protecting against aspiration after esophago-pharyngeal reflux. Not only are there inter-phase excitatory processes, but also inhibitory processes. A significant inhibitory process is deglutitive inhibition. When one swallows faster than peristalsis ends, peristalsis is inhibited by the new pharyngeal phase. This process prevents the ongoing esophageal peristaltic wave from blocking the bolus being pushed into the esophagus by the new wave. The esophageal phase returns during the last swallow of the sequence. This process is probably mediated by mucosal tension receptors through the superior laryngeal nerves. A similar reflex exists, the pharyngo-esophageal inhibitory reflex, but studies indicate that it is controlled by a different neural pathway. The pharyngo-esophageal inhibitory reflex is mediated by mucosal tension receptors through the glossopharyngeal nerve. In summary, there are significant peripheral processes that contribute to swallowing, whereby one phase of swallowing significantly affects the other.

Fluoxetine promotes the recovery of dysphagia and improves nutritional status and neurotrophic status in dysphagia patients after acute ischemic stroke.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of fluoxetine on swallowing function, neurotrophic factors, and psychological status in patients with dysphagia after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). A total of 118 patients with dysphagia after AIS who were diagnosed and treated in our hospital from July 2020 to March 2022 were selected as the study objects with 59 cases in each group. Patients in the control group underwent routine treatment and swallowing rehabilitation without fluoxetine. Patients in the study group received routine treatment, swallowing rehabilitation, and fluoxetine treatment. The quality of life was compared according to the Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (CQOLI-74). Patients were followed for 90 days, and the grades were compared with the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The total effective rate of the study group was 84.75%, which was higher than that of the control group with 62.71% (χ2 = 7.394, P < 0.05). The life quality scores of the two groups were both dramatically elevated compared to those before the treatment, and the study group had a sensibly higher life quality score than the control group (P < 0.05). The proportion of grade 4~5 in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group (χ2 = 492, P < 0.05). The total incidence of adverse reactions in the control group was 5.08% (3/59), which was significantly lower than that in the study group with 11.86% (7/59) (χ2 = 1.748, P = 0.186). Fluoxetine has a significant effect on the treatment of dysphagia after AIS by enhancing the recovery of dysphagia and promoting the recovery of neurological function.

Molecular biomarkers of dysphagia targeted exercise induced neuroplasticity: A review of mechanistic processes and preliminary data on detraining effects.

While molecular adaptations accompanying neuroplasticity during physical exercises are well-established, little is known about adaptations during dysphagia-targeted exercises. This research article has two primary purposes. First, we aim to review the existing literature on the intersection between resistance (strength) training, molecular markers of neuroplasticity, and dysphagia rehabilitation. Specifically, we discuss the molecular mechanisms of two potential molecular markers: brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in exercise-induced neuroplasticity. Second, we present preliminary data on the effects of two weeks of detraining on circulating serum BDNF, IGF-1 levels, and expiratory muscle strength. This subset is a part of our more extensive studies related to dysphagia-targeted resistance exercise and neuroplasticity. Five young adult males underwent four weeks of expiratory muscle strength training, followed by two weeks of detraining. We measured expiratory strength, circulating levels of BDNF, and IGF-1 at post-training and detraining conditions. Our results show that expiratory muscle strength, serum BDNF, and IGF-1 levels decreased after detraining; however, this effect was statistically significant only for serum BDNF levels. Oropharyngeal and upper airway musculature involved in swallowing undergoes similar adaptation patterns to skeletal muscles during physical exercise. To fully comprehend the mechanisms underlying the potential neuroplastic benefits of targeted exercise on swallowing functions, mechanistic studies (models) investigating neuroplasticity induced by exercises addressing dysphagia are critical. Such models would ensure that interventions effectively and efficiently achieve neuroplastic benefits and improve patient outcomes, ultimately advancing our understanding of dysphagia-targeted exercise-induced neuroplasticity.