RESUMEN
Purpose: Chronic kidney disease is a frequent complication of diabetes mellitus. Tirzepatide is the first dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist approved for glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. We present the efficacy and prescribing practices of tirzepatide in a cohort with diabetes and chronic kidney disease in a large tertiary care setting. Methods: We retrospectively identified new outpatient tirzepatide prescriptions in adults ≥18 years with diabetes and chronic kidney disease stages 1-5 from 2022 to 2023 across the Barnes Jewish Hospital system (St Louis, Missouri). Results: We identified 102 subjects with chronic kidney disease and diabetes who started tirzepatide between 2022 and 2023, and used for ≥6 months. Mean duration of tirzepatide use in our cohort was 13.89 ± 2.51 months. Among subjects who stopped, 57% (n=4) were due to limited medication availability or lack of insurance coverage. Tirzepatide use led to a significant reduction in hemoglobin A1c by 1.15%, weight by nearly 10%, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and total cholesterol (p<0.05 for all). Conclusion: We found that tirzepatide was an effective therapy with significant benefits on glycemic control, blood pressure, cholesterol, and weight in subjects with diabetes and chronic kidney disease treated at a tertiary care facility.
RESUMEN
Early dumping syndrome (DS) and postbariatric hypoglycemia (PBH) are challenging conditions with limited treatment options. A 46-year-old woman with prediabetes, obesity, and sleeve gastrectomy presented with digestive symptoms suggestive of DS and postprandial hypoglycemia consistent with PBH. She started tirzepatide 2.5â mg weekly, which decreased postprandial blood glucose peaks, increased postprandial blood glucose nadirs, and improved overall time in range on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Her postprandial bloating and diarrhea resolved. To our knowledge, there have been no reported cases of DS or PBH treated with dual-incretin agonists. While glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have not been widely attempted in DS and have shown mixed benefit for PBH, combination GLP-1 and gastric inhibitory peptide agonism may represent a novel treatment both for PBH and DS, providing greater improvement in glycemic variation as well as better DS control than GLP-1 agonism alone.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Reports of suicidality associated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been reported to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We previously reported an increased reporting odds ratio (ROR) of some measures of suicidality with semaglutide and liraglutide using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Notwithstanding the increased ROR, causality between GLP-1 RAs exposure and any aspect of suicidality is not established. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The analysis herein aims to extend a previous analysis of the FAERS by evaluating the ROR for suicidality reported to the World Health Organization (WHO) Pharmacovigilance Database (VigiBase). We aimed to characterize the ROR of suicidality associated with GLP-1 RAs, as extrapolated from spontaneous reports. As per our previous report, the ROR was considered significant when the lower limit of the 95 % confidence (CI) was >1.0. RESULTS: We searched VigiBase reports from inception to January 2024. The RORs for suicidal ideation were significantly increased for semaglutide (5.82), liraglutide (4.03) and tirzepatide (2.25). For "depression/suicidal", the ROR was significantly increased for semaglutide (14.74) and liraglutide (5.86); and for suicidal behaviour, the ROR was significantly increased for semaglutide (6.52) and liraglutide (3.90). However, for suicide attempts, the ROR was significantly decreased for semaglutide (0.11), dulaglutide (0.075), exenatide (0.047) and liraglutide (0.15). For completed suicide, the ROR was also significantly decreased for semaglutide (0.01), dulaglutide (0.003), exenatide (0.002) and liraglutide (0.008). CONCLUSION: Unlike our previous report with FAERS, a mixed pattern of ROR emerged in the WHO VigiBase with respect to suicidality and exposure to select GLP-RAs. Causation between GLP-1 RA exposure and suicidality (either increased or decreased) cannot be ascertained from ROR data.
RESUMEN
Obesity and hypertension have become an international health issue, with detrimental consequences on patients. Obesity and hypertension share common pathophysiological mechanisms, such as overactivity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and the sympathetic nervous systems, insulin resistance, and disruption of the leptin pathway. Approved therapies for obesity and overweight include phentermine/topiramate, orlistat, naltrexone/bupropion, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists liraglutide and semaglutide, tirzepatide, and bariatric surgery. This review gives the clinical data in a thorough manner and explains in detail how each of the previously mentioned therapies affects blood pressure levels.
RESUMEN
Background: Tirzepatide is a novel glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (RA) that is approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). Despite its similarities to GLP-1 RA, there is a lack of data on how to switch between GLP-1 RA and GIP/GLP-1 RA. Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from GLP-1 RA to tirzepatide in patients with T2D and provide guidance for switching between the two classes. Methods: This was a retrospective case series of patients with T2D who met protocol criteria for switching between the two classes. Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) and weight data were evaluated at 3 and 6 months. Results: A total of 10 patients were included. Mean change from baseline in A1C was -0.7 ± 0.9% at 3 months (N = 8) compared to -1.4 ± 0.7% at 6 months (N = 4). Percentage of patients who achieved their goal A1C was 25% (2/8) at 3 months post switch compared to 50% (2/4) at 6 months. Mean change from baseline in weight was -3.6 ± 2.3 kg at 3 months and -6 ± 3.4 kg at 6 months. Percentage of patients who achieved weight loss from baseline of ≥10% was 0 at 3 months versus 33.3% (1/3) at 6 months. Few adverse events were reported after switching. Conclusion: Switching can be considered for patients with T2D that require further A1C and weight reduction to reach their target goals despite being on GLP-1 RA.
RESUMEN
Background This systematic review is registered with CRD42024507397 protocol number and aims to compare the known data about retatrutide on long-term cardiovascular (CV) protection with tirzepatide, an incretin with recent proven CV benefits. Material and Methods The inclusion criteria were (i) original full-text articles that are randomized control or clinical trials; (ii) published within the last ten years; (iii) published in English; and (iv) conducted on adult human populations. The exclusion criteria were articles deruled on cell cultures or mammals. Studies were selected if they (1) included patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and CV risk; (2) patients that received either tirzepatide or retatrutide; and (3) provided sufficient information such as the corresponding 95% confidence intervals or at least a sufficient p-value. Studies were excluded if they were a letter to the editor, expert opinions, case reports, meeting abstracts, or reviews; redundant publications; or needed more precise or complete data. Results The seven included studies were assessed for bias with the Newcastle Ottawa scale, heterogenous, and emphasized the potential CV beneficial effect of type 2 DM (T2DM) therapies (glycemia, glycated A1c hemoglobin, body weight, lipid profile, blood pressure and renal parameter). Discussions Further, longer follow-up studies are necessary to verify the long-term CV protection, standardize the specific aspects of CV risk, and compare with subjects without T2DM for a more integrative interpretation of the CV effects independent of the improvement of metabolic activity.
RESUMEN
The case reports a woman in her 70s, with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease in G4 stage. The patient had elevated HbA1c, and she was switched from linagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, to dulaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA). Thereafter, the HbA1c level decreased; however, since the dulaglutide supply became a problem, the patient was switched to tirzepatide, a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1RA. To date, no clinical studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of switching from GLP-1RA to GIP/GLP-1RA, but we report this case because efficacy was observed in this patient. The therapeutic effects after switching to tirzepatide included decrease in HbA1c, increase in eGFR, and decrease in BUN, when compared to when dulaglutide was used. A change from dulaglutide to tirzepatide, could inhibit renal impairment progression and improve renal function.
RESUMEN
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are prevalent metabolic disorders affecting millions of individuals worldwide. A new effective therapeutic drug called tirzepatide for the treatment of obesity and T2D is a dual agonist of the GIP receptor and GLP-1 receptor. Tirzepatide is clinically more effective than GLP-1 receptor agonists but the reasons why are not well understood. Tirzepatide reportedly stimulates the GIP receptor more potently than the GLP-1 receptor. However, tirzepatide signaling has not been thoroughly investigated at the E354 (wildtype) or Q354 (E354Q) GIP receptor variants. The E354Q variant is associated increased risk of T2D and lower body mass index. To better understand GIP receptor signaling we characterized the activity of endogenous agonists and tirzepatide at both GIP receptor variants. Using Cos7 cells we examined wildtype and E354Q GIP receptor signaling, analyzing cAMP and IP1 accumulation as well as AKT, ERK1/2 and CREB phosphorylation. GIP(1-42) and GIP(1-30)NH2 displayed equipotent effects on these pathways excluding CREB phosphorylation where GIP(1-30)NH2 was more potent than GIP(1-42) at the E354Q GIP receptor. Tirzepatide favored cAMP signaling at both variants. These findings indicate that tirzepatide is a biased agonist towards Gαs signaling and suggests it equally activates the wildtype and E354Q GIP receptor variants. We also observed differences between the pharmacology of the GIP receptor variants with endogenous peptides, which may help to explain differences in phenotype. These findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of GIP receptor signaling, and will aid development of therapies combating T2D and obesity.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF COMMENTARY: This commentary aims to offer a perspective on the effect of tirzepatide on hypoxic burden and provide indirect evidence of cardiovascular risk reduction after tirzepatide for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and obesity. It also discusses the role of tirzepatide-induced weight loss in the management of obstructive sleep apnea. RECENT FINDINGS: In the SURMOUNT-OSA phase 3 trials, tirzepatide, a new GIP/GLP-1 receptor co-agonist, reduced the apnea-hypopnea index, hypoxic burden, and body weight in adults with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea and obesity. The change in apnea-hypopnea index is clinically relevant, but its impact on cardiovascular mortality remains unclear. Conversely, hypoxic burden predicts cardiovascular mortality across populations independent of AHI. We attempted to postulate the magnitude of cardiovascular benefits of tirzepatide based on the reduction in hypoxic burden. Tirzepatide treatment for obstructive sleep apnea and obesity seems to result in hypoxic burden values associated with a lower cardiovascular mortality rate and thus might attenuate the negative cardiovascular impact of hypoxic burden.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Interventions that combat obesity and its associated metabolic perturbations may decrease incidence and improve outcomes of endometrial cancer (EC). Potential options for weight loss include pharmacotherapeutic interventions such as tirzepatide, a dual-acting glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonist. Given this, we explored the anti-obesity and anti-tumorigenic effects of tirzepatide in our pre-clinical mouse model of endometrioid EC. METHODS: Starting at 4 weeks of age, Lkb1fl/flp53fl/fl mice were fed a low-fat diet vs a high-fat diet to generate a lean or obese phenotype. Nine weeks after induction of EC, obese and lean mice were randomized to receive tirzepatide for 4 weeks. Body and tumor weights, tumor transcriptomic and metabolomic profiles, and serum metabolic markers and chemokines were assessed. RESULTS: Both obese and lean mice began to lose body weight after 2 weeks of tirzepatide treatment, ultimately achieving a significant weight loss of 20.1 % in obese mice and 16.8 % in lean mice. Tirzepatide improved obesity-induced serum adiponectin, leptin, GIP, and C-reactive protein levels. Furthermore, tirzepatide relative to vehicle, effectively reduced tumor growth in obese and lean mice, inhibited the ErbB signaling and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis in tumors of obese mice, and increased O-linked glycosylation biosynthesis and phospholipase D signaling in tumors of lean mice. CONCLUSION: Tirzepatide decreased both mouse weight and tumor growth via effects on metabolic and immune pathways in the EC tumors that differed between obese and lean mice. This novel weight loss treatment deserves further evaluation as an innovative strategy in the management of EC.
RESUMEN
Tirzepatide is the first dual incretin glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor activator approved for the management of type II diabetes mellitus. This drug was also recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a management option for patients with obesity. Tirzepatide has been also reported to be beneficial in reducing liver fat content. Although its efficacy is well described in the literature, no cases of tirzepatide-induced hepatotoxicity have been reported. We report a case of a 37-year-old woman with metabolic syndrome who was noted to have elevated liver enzymes secondary to tirzepatide use.
RESUMEN
Obesity places patients at higher risk for numerous problems, including prediabetes, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are antidiabetic drugs that have a recognized effect on weight loss. This systematic review analyzed semaglutide against alternative GLP-1 agonists in facilitating weight loss and evaluated their associated adverse events (AEs) in diabetic patients. A systematic search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies comparing semaglutide and other GLP-1 RAs for weight loss. A narrative synthesis and meta-analysis using SPSS program version 29 were performed to analyze the differences in weight loss between cohorts. Nine studies with 5,445 patients whose mean age was 60.01 years (55.5-70) and mean follow-up of 32.5 weeks (4-58.7) were included. The meta-analysis showed that semaglutide had a greater mean weight loss compared to liraglutide (-6.08, 95% confidence interval (Cl) = -8.40, -3.75) and dulaglutide (-2.85, 95% CI = -5.59, 0.11). Tirzepatide had a greater mean weight loss compared to semaglutide (-3.78, 95% CI = -5.52, -2.04). Common AEs included minor and moderate gastrointestinal events. In conclusion, GLP-1 RAs have shown efficacy in reducing body weight in T2DM patients. Semaglutide, liraglutide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, and exenatide demonstrated mean weight loss reductions of 4.81 kg, 2.81 kg, 4.03 kg, 9.7 kg, and 1.9 kg, respectively, with high rates of minimal to moderate-severity AEs. Semaglutide demonstrated increased numerical weight loss compared to its comparators (dulaglutide, liraglutide, and exenatide). However, tirzepatide, a dual-agonist, produced greater weight loss compared to semaglutide. The paucity of comparative head-to-head trials prevents a definitive conclusion of the superiority of one GLP-1 RA over another.
RESUMEN
Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent disease in the general population and also a well-established risk factor for the development of ischemic stroke. Patients who have been diagnosed with diabetes have a 20% higher risk for developing ischemic stroke in comparison to non-diabetic individuals. The aim of the current systematic review is to provide the latest evidence regarding the association between antidiabetic treatment and the prevention of ischemic stroke. Methods: A comprehensive search in scientific literature databases PUBMED, COCHRANE, and SCOPUS was conducted. The studies that were deemed as eligible for this review were those that examined the clinical benefits of therapeutic strategies in terms of preventing ischemic strokes. Results: A total of 32 studies met the established selection criteria. The included studies showed that pioglitazone treatment significantly reduced the risk for recurrent stroke in patients with DM. Furthermore, in the context of primary prevention, the improvement in glycemic control after treatment with the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) semaglutide and dulaglutide was associated with a reduction in the risk of ischemic stroke in diabetic subjects. Metformin monotherapy may reduce stroke risk, while dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, and insulin do not seem to affect the incidence of stroke. Conclusions: The findings of the present systematic review suggest that pioglitazone and GLP-1RA may decrease the risk of stroke. Further studies are needed to provide additional data regarding the preventive effect of novel antidiabetic drugs, such as dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/GLP-1RA agents, on stroke.
RESUMEN
Background/Objectives: Food cravings involve a strong drive to consume palatable foods irrespective of nutritional status. Importantly, cravings contribute substantially to the obesity epidemic. Managing hunger alone is insufficient for weight management as this relates only to homeostatic eating and does not address the complex aetiology of hedonic eating and its crucial role in food cravings. Medical weight management clinics and anti-obesity medication trials do not routinely identify and address food cravings. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of the literature consisting of 115 peer-reviewed articles (original articles and reviews). We included articles focused on food craving pathophysiology, assessment, and management strategies providing contrasts against the current medical model of weight management seen in obesity pharmacotherapy trials as well as the current standard of practise. Results: We outline the neurohormonal and psychological drivers of cravings, which lead to a spectrum of eating behaviours, from comfort food eating to binge eating disorders. We provide an overview of ways of identification and measurement options, including their strengths and weaknesses, and an overview of management strategies and their cravings control efficacy, spanning lifestyle modifications like nutrition and sleep, psychological therapies (i.e., cognitive behavioural therapy [CBT], acceptance-based therapies such as mindfulness) and, last but not least, medications that not only are approved for weight reduction but reduce cravings. Finally, based on these findings, we provide a proposed integrated and iterative model that is able to evolve and adapt to the individual over time in tackling cravings for long-term weight loss maintenance. Conclusions: The findings emphasise the importance of cravings management and provide a synthesis on how cravings can be identified in a medical weight management setting, which can be practically implemented in an integrated iterative model spanning anti-obesity medications that have craving control data to evidence-based lifestyle and psychological interventions.
Asunto(s)
Ansia , Obesidad , Humanos , Ansia/fisiología , Obesidad/terapia , Obesidad/psicología , Conducta Alimentaria/psicología , Conducta Alimentaria/fisiología , Pérdida de Peso , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a significant health concern with potential for recurrent episodes and serious complications. The risk of recurrence in type 2 diabetes (T2D) or obesity can be influenced by various factors and treatments, including GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). This study evaluates the risk of recurrent AP among patients with a history of the condition, focusing on the effects of different GLP-1RA treatments. OBJECTIVES: Our objective is to compare the recurrence risks of AP between patients treated with different GLP-1RAs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX platform, encompassing 258,238 individuals with T2D or obesity who have a history of AP. We assessed the recurrence of AP over a five-year period, analyzing data on treatment regimens, with a focus on the use of Semaglutide, Tirzepatide, and other GLP-1RAs. RESULTS: GLP-1RA users experienced significantly lower recurrence rates of AP, with those without risk factors showing GLP-1RA users had a recurrence rate of 13.8 % compared to 40.9 % for non-users. Semaglutide and Tirzepatide showed the most favorable outcomes; Semaglutide users had lower recurrence rates than Exenatide (10.1 % vs. 27 %) and slightly lower than Dulaglutide (13.6 % vs. 15.4 %), though not statistically significant with Dulaglutide. Tirzepatide users displayed the lowest recurrence risk at 6.2 %, significantly lower than those on Semaglutide (11.7 %). CONCLUSIONS: GLP-1RAs, particularly Semaglutide and Tirzepatide, are associated with a reduced risk of recurrent AP in people with T2D or obesity. The differential risk profile between these drugs highlights the need for further studies and personalized treatment plans.
RESUMEN
Tirzepatide (TZP) is a new anti-obesity drug, and little is currently known about its effect on body composition (BC) in people with overweight or obesity. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review on the impact of TZP on BC compartments in this population during weight loss programs. Literature searches, study selection, method development, and quality appraisal were performed. The data were synthesized using a narrative approach, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Of the 1379 papers retrieved, 6 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed, revealing the following findings. Firstly, TZP was shown to result in a significant reduction in total fat mass (FM), visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and waist circumference (WC) between baseline and short as well as intermediate follow-ups. Compared to other anti-obesity medications (e.g., dulaglutide and semaglutide) taken over the same duration, TZP showed a superior decrease in body fat compartments (i.e., total FM, VAT and WC). Finally, the effect of TZP on fat-free mass (FFM) is still uncertain because the findings remain inconclusive. In conclusion, TZP appears to be an effective strategy for achieving significant improvements in body fat and its distribution, but additional investigations are still needed to determine the impact of TZP on lean mass in this population.
RESUMEN
Incretin gut hormones, especially glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), raise a huge interest in diabetology. GLP-1 receptor agonists have gained a privileged role in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). They improve glucose control without inducing hypoglycaemia, while promoting weight loss. Furthermore, they protect people with T2D against atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and contribute to reduce the risk of heart failure and chronic kidney disease, two other common complications of T2D. A recent innovation consists in the development of co-agonists that target both GIP and GLP-1 receptors. Whereas the co-infusion of GIP and GLP-1 failed to further reduce hyperglycaemia of T2D compared to GLP-1 single infusion, tirzepatide, an original dual unimolecular biaised GIP/GLP-1 agonist, showed a remarkable improvement of glucose control in the SURPASS programme in patients with T2D. Consequently, it is now commercialized in many countries for the management of T2D. GLP-1/glucagon (GCG) co-agonists and GIP/GLP-1/GCG poly-agonists are currently in development, aiming to benefit from the favourable effects of GCG on energy expenditure and liver lipid metabolism, while mitigating the hyperglycaemic effects of this hormone thanks to balanced effects of GLP-1 and/or GIP. They might occupy in the future an interesting place in the management of obesity and its metabolic complications among which T2D and liver steatosis.
Les hormones digestives à effet incrétine, en particulier le «glucagon-like peptide-1¼ (GLP-1) et le «glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide¼ (GIP) suscitent un intérêt considérable en diabétologie. Les agonistes des récepteurs du GLP-1 ont acquis une place de choix dans la prise en charge des patients avec un diabète de type 2 (DT2). Ils améliorent le contrôle glycémique, sans provoquer des hypoglycémies, tout en faisant perdre du poids. De plus, ils protègent contre les maladies cardiovasculaires athéromateuses. Enfin, ils contribuent à réduire le risque d'insuffisance cardiaque et de maladie rénale chronique, deux autres complications fréquentes du DT2. Une innovation récente consiste dans le développement de co-agonistes ciblant à la fois les récepteurs du GLP-1 et du GIP. Alors que la co-infusion de GIP et de GLP-1 ne réduit pas davantage l'hyperglycémie du DT2 qu'une perfusion isolée de GLP-1, le tirzépatide, un agoniste biaisé unimoléculaire original à effet double sur les récepteurs GIP/GLP-1, a montré une amélioration remarquable du contrôle glycémique, tout en favorisant l'amaigrissement, dans le programme SURPASS chez le patient avec DT2. Ce médicament est maintenant commercialisé dans de nombreux pays. Des co-agonistes GLP-1/glucagon (GCG) et des poly-agonistes GIP/GLP-1/GCG sont actuellement développés, profitant des effets favorables du glucagon sur les dépenses énergétiques et le métabolisme lipidique hépatique, tout en maîtrisant les effets hyperglycémiants de cette hormone grâce aux actions balancées du GLP-1 et/ou du GIP. Ils pourraient occuper à l'avenir une place intéressante dans le traitement de l'obésité et ses complications métaboliques dont le DT2 et la stéatopathie hépatique.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón , Incretinas , Humanos , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Incretinas/uso terapéutico , Incretinas/farmacología , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacología , Polipéptido Inhibidor Gástrico/uso terapéutico , Polipéptido Inhibidor Gástrico/agonistas , Polipéptido Inhibidor Gástrico/farmacología , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Agonistas Receptor de Péptidos Similares al GlucagónRESUMEN
Background: Tirzepatide, a novel dual agonist of glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), has demonstrated greater magnitude of weight loss compared to semaglutide in a phase 3 clinical trial. However, the effect of tirzepatide on incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in individuals with overweight and obesity, and the effect on major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with pre-existing T2D, remains unknown. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of anonymised electronic medical records using the TriNetX network (TriNetX LLC, Cambridge, MA, USA) a global federated database. The data used in this study was collected on 5th June 2024. Two cohorts of individuals were generated: 1) without pre-existing T2D and, 2) with T2D. We adopted an active comparator new user design on new initiations of either tirzepatide or semaglutide therapy. Analysis began from the index event which was defined as individuals on respective therapy for 6 months only. Analysis of outcomes was conducted off-drug, in individuals without a pre-existing history of the disease of interest. Individuals were followed up for 12 months post the index event. Primary outcome for cohort 1 was incidence of T2D, and for cohort 2 was composite: all-cause mortality, cerebral infarction, acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure. Secondary outcomes for cohort 1 were change in HbA1c and body weight and for cohort 2: incidence of micro- and macrovascular complications, suicidal ideation and/or attempt, and all-cause mortality. We propensity score matched (1:1) for potential confounders: baseline demographics, socioeconomic circumstances, HbA1c, weight, relevant co-morbidities, and anti-obesity, hypoglycaemic and cardioprotective agents. Findings: The study population without T2D consisted of 13,846 individuals, equally split between tirzepatide and semaglutide users. Tirzepatide was associated with both lower risk for incident T2D (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.92, p < 0.001) and greater weight loss (-7.7 kg, [95% CI -6.8, -8.5 kg], p < 0.001), compared to semaglutide (-4.8 kg, [95% CI -3.9, -5.6 kg], p < 0.001). In individuals with pre-existing T2D (n = 8446), tirzepatide was associated with lower risk of the composite outcome (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.76, p < 0.001), cerebral infarction (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.84, p = 0.010) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.15-0.73, p = 0.004) compared to semaglutide. Interpretation: Tirzepatide is associated with significantly reduced risk of developing T2D and major adverse cardiovascular events in individuals living with obesity and T2D respectively. Randomised controlled trials investigating the utility of dual incretin agonists in the primary prevention of T2D and cardiovascular disease in higher risk populations are now required. Funding: Nil.