Is Oncoplastic Surgery Safe in High-Risk Breast Cancer Phenotypes?

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) has increased in popularity over the recent years. It is a form of breast conservation surgery allowing for larger partial mastectomy (PM) resections followed by either volume displacement or volume replacement reconstruction techniques. However, there is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness and safety of OPS with radiotherapy (OPS + RT) in high-risk breast cancer phenotypes, such as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HER2 positive (HER2+) patients. Our aim was to compare the breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and postoperative surgical complications in OPS + RT compared to PM alone with radiation (PM + RT) and total mastectomy (MTX) without radiotherapy (MTX-RT). METHODS: Patient data were analyzed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registries from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2020. Patients were stratified according to the type of surgery. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess prognostic factors of BCSS. RESULTS: A total of 24 621 patients with high-risk breast cancer phenotypes were identified, 180 underwent OPS + RT; 13 402, PM + RT; and 11 039 MTX-RT. OPS + RT was more frequently performed in younger (mean age of 65.53 years, SD: 9.29, p < 0.001), non-Hispanic White (90.5% vs. 77.7% vs. 76.3%) and single women (17.9% vs. 12.1% vs. 13.3%). MTX-RT was usually performed in patients with high histological grade, TNBC, and higher stages. Overall complication rates were higher in the MTX-RT, compared to OPS + RT and PM + RT, 2%, 1.1%, and 0.7%, respectively, p < 0.001. Rates of hematoma and surgical site infections were higher in the MTX-RT group. With a median follow-up of 46 months, OPS + RT had better BCSS rates at 5 years compared to PM + RT and MTX-RT (97.1% vs. 94.7% vs. 89.8%, p < 0.001). MTX-RT was found to be an independent prognostic factor of worse BCSS compared to OPS + RT (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.584; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.005-7.171), while PM + RT had no difference compared to OPS + RT (HR = 1.670, 95% CI: 0.624-4.469). CONCLUSIONS: OPS is a safe breast surgical option in patients with HER2+ and TNBC. Patients with high-risk phenotypes who underwent OPS + RT and have similar BCSS and complication rates compared to standard breast surgical options. As such, OPS should be considered as an option whenever breast conservation surgery is being discussed.

Oncological Safety of Skipping Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Clinical N0, Sentinel Node-Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Total Mastectomy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone could afford oncological outcomes comparable with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with early breast cancer without palpable lymphadenopathy who underwent total mastectomy (TM) and were SLN-positive. METHODS: This study analyzed clinical data of 6747 patients with breast cancer who underwent TM between 2014 and 2018 in two tertiary hospitals in Korea. Overall, 643 clinical stage T1-3 N0 patients who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy and had one to two metastatic SLNs at the time of surgery were included. Propensity score matching was performed between the SLNB alone and ALND groups, adjusting for clinical T stage and number of metastatic SLNs. In total, 237 patients were allocated to each group. RESULTS: Mean number of metastatic SLNs was 1.2 for the SLNB group and 1.6 for the ALND group. With a median follow-up of 65.0 months, 5 year disease-free survival was 90.8% for the SLNB group and 93.9% for the ALND group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-2.58; p = 0.36). 5 year ipsilateral locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) was not significantly different between the two groups (95.1% and 98.3% for the SLNB and ALND groups, respectively) [HR 1.86, 95% CI 0.69-5.04; p = 0.21]. In the SLNB group, patients who received radiation therapy (RT) showed superior 5 year LRRFS than patients who did not receive RT (100% vs. 92.9%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Collectively, our findings suggest that SLNB could afford comparable outcomes to ALND in patients with early breast cancer and one to two metastatic SLNs who underwent TM. Importantly, RT could decrease locoregional recurrence in patients who underwent SLNB alone.

Preoperative depression and anxiety associated with younger age and receipt of immediate breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: As survivorship for breast cancer continues to improve, emphasis of care falls upon improving patients' quality of life. Understanding physical and mental health in the preoperative period is needed to aid surgical decision making and improve patient experience. METHODS: Consecutive patients awaiting total mastectomy (TM), TM with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and breast conserving surgery (BCS) were prospectively recruited. Scores for PHQ-9, GAD-7, Breast-Q, EQ5D(5L), PEG were collected preoperatively. Association was measured with multivariate analyses. RESULTS: 477 participants (374 BSC, 46 â€‹TM, 84 IBR) were included. Younger patients and those choosing IBR reported worse depression and anxiety symptoms. Clinical tumor features did not affect patient reported outcomes. Higher Breast-Q scores were seen with BCS and lower scores with TM. CONCLUSIONS: Patients scheduled for IBR and younger patients reported worse symptoms of depression and anxiety, regardless of clinical features. This will help with surgical decision making and identify patients in need for additional perioperative supports.

Long-term follow-up of complex oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery, standard breast conservation and skin-sparing mastectomy in DCIS - a register-based study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies evaluate oncological safety in complex oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery(C-OBCS) for DCIS. It still needs to be defined whether it is equivalent to standard breast conservation(S-BCS) or an alternative to skin-sparing mastectomy(SSM). This study compares local recurrence rates(LR), disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival (OS) between the three surgical techniques. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective register-based study on LR, DFS and OS of patients operated with S-BCS(n=1388), C-OBCS (n=106) or skin-sparing mastectomy (n=218) for DCIS diagnosed 2007-2020. Data was extracted from the Norwegian Breast Cancer Registry. RESULTS: In the S-BCS, C-OBCS and SSM groups, median age was 60, 58 and 51 years (p<0.001), median size 15, 25, and 40 mm (p<0.001) and median follow-up 55, 48 and 76 months. At ten years, the overall LR was 12.7%, 14.3% for S-BCS, 11.2% for C-OBCS and 6.8% for SSM. Overall DFS at ten years was 82.3%, 80.5% for S-BCS, 82.4% for C-OBCS and 90.4% for SSM. At ten years, the OS was 93.8%, 93.0% in S-BCS, 93.3% in C-OBCS and 96.6% in the SSM group. Weighted Kaplan Meier plots showed that SSM had a significantly higher DFS than S-BCS (p=0.003) and C-OBCS (p=0.029). DFS in C-OBCS versus S-BCS and the difference in OS was not significant (p=0.264). CONCLUSION: SSM had a significantly higher DFS than S-BCS and C-OBCS. The difference in DFS between S-BCS and C-OBCS, and OS between the three groups was not statistically significant. Our study suggests that C-OBCS is a safe alternative to S-BCS and SSM.

[Unilateral secondary breast reconstruction using a pedicled dorsal flap sparing the latissimus dorsi (TDAP and MSLD) in patients with a history of total mastectomy for breast cancer. Monocentric observational study]. / Reconstruction mammaire secondaire unilatérale par lambeau dorsal pédiculé épargnant le muscle grand dorsal (TDAP et MSLD) chez les patientes aux antécédents de mastectomie totale pour cancer du sein. Étude observationnelle monocentrique.

INTRODUCTION: The use of pedicled dorsal flaps sparing the latissimus dorsi muscle (TDAP and MSLD flap) is a well-described reconstruction method in breast reconstruction after breast cancer. However, little data exists regarding patient satisfaction after this surgery. The main objective of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction after unilateral total secondary breast reconstruction using a TDAP or MSLD flap. The secondary objectives corresponded to the evaluation of postoperative complications following this surgery, the evaluation of the duration of the reconstruction and the nature of additional interventions, the evaluation of the functional after-effects, and the evaluation of the chest size when the reconstruction is completed. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This is a monocentric, retrospective cohort study, including 22 patients who underwent unilateral secondary total breast reconstruction using a TDAP or MSLD flap between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022. Patient satisfaction was assessed using three questionnaires validated in breast reconstruction: the Reconstruction module of the BREAST-Q, the MBROS-S and the MBROS-BI. RESULTS: The MBROS-S satisfaction score is 71.4%. The MBROS-BI body image score is 62%. With the BREAST-Q, the Satisfaction with Breast score is estimated at 53.1; the Satisfaction with Back score is estimated at 75.5; the physical well-being score regarding the chest is evaluated at 71.7; the physical well-being score concerning the shoulder and back is evaluated at 67.4; the psychosocial well-being score is assessed at 67.4; the sexual well-being score is estimated at 48.7; and for women who have benefited from reconstruction associated with a prosthesis, the satisfaction score regarding the implant is 71.6. CONCLUSION: Unilateral total secondary breast reconstruction with a dorsal pedicled flap sparing the latissimus dorsi muscle is an elegant, reliable, and respectful way to reconstruct a breast, and appears to give high levels of satisfaction.

Boomerang latissimus dorsi flap in immediate or delayed breast reconstruction.

Background: Breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi (LD) flap is one of the most popular and common breast reconstruction techniques among Asian patients. There are increasing numbers of cases wherein breasts need to be reconstructed to moderate to large sizes among the Asian population. Most reconstructive surgeons use abdominal-based flaps-such as the deep inferior epigastric perforator and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, or LD flap with an implant-to supplement the volume. Here, we compare the usefulness of the boomerang LD (bLD) flap-a technique developed by modifying the design of the conventional extended LD flap-with that of the LD flap with implant (LDi). Methods: This was a prospective cohort study including patients with breast cancer aged between 25 and 60 years who underwent unilateral total or skin/nipple-sparing mastectomy, or postmastectomy. The exclusion criteria were advanced breast cancer (stages 3 and 4); a history of cognitive impairment affecting ability to complete the self-reported questionnaire; a history of neurologic or musculoskeletal disorder; and a history of alcohol or drug abuse. Statistical analysis was performed, and correlations between the two technique types were analyzed [including age, body mass index, preoperative breast volume, operation time, flap elevation time, admission duration, adjuvant treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy), drain indwelling duration, and drain total sum volume]. Results: In total, 85 patients who underwent immediate breast construction through the LDi group (n=63) or bLD group (n=25) techniques after total mastectomy between January 2015 and June 2022 were analyzed (mean age: LDi group, 46±7.7 years; bLD group, 45.6±7.8 years). We observed that the flap weight, operative time, mean admission duration, and drain indwelling duration were statistically significantly different in the bLD group (P<0.05). Body mass index, preoperative breast volume, specimen weight, flap elevation time, and drain total time were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Breast reconstruction using the bLD flap was found to be a suitable alternative technique for patients who desire an autologous tissue transfer (rather than an implant) but are contraindicated for abdominal-based flaps and do not mind long postoperative scars.

Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of different breast cancer surgery procedures: a Markov decision tree-based approach in the framework of Predictive, Preventive, and Personalized Medicine.

Purpose: Breast cancer is a complex disease with heterogeneous outcomes that may benefit from the implementation of Predictive, Preventive, and Personalized Medicine (PPPM/3PM) strategies. In this study, we aimed to explore the potential of PPPM approaches by investigating the 10-year trends in quality of life (QOL) and the cost-effectiveness of different types of surgeries for patients with breast cancer. Methods: This prospective cohort study recruited 144 patients undergoing breast conserving surgery (BCS), 199 undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM), and 44 undergoing total mastectomy with transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (TRAMF) from three medical centers in Taiwan between June 2007 and June 2010. Results: All patients exhibited a significant decrease in most QOL dimension scores from before surgery to 6 months postoperatively (p < 0.05); however, from postoperative year 1 to 2, improvement in most QOL dimension scores was significantly better in the TRAMF group than in the BCS and MRM groups (p < 0.05). At 2, 5, and 10 years after surgery, the patients' QOL remained stable. In the Markov decision tree model, the TRAMF group had higher total direct medical costs than the MRM and BCS groups (US$ 32,426, US$ 29,487, and US$ 28,561, respectively) and higher average QALYs gained (7.771, 6.773, and 7.385, respectively), with an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of US$ 2,944.39 and US$ 10,013.86 per QALY gained. Conclusions: TRAMF appeared cost effective compared with BCS and MRM, and it has been proved with considerable QOL improvements in the framework of PPPM. Future studies should continue to explore the potential of PPPM approaches in breast cancer care. By incorporating predictive models, personalized treatment plans, and preventive strategies into routine clinical practice, we can further optimize patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs associated with breast cancer treatment. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-023-00326-4.

Risk factors of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer with 1-2 sentinel lymph node macrometastases underwent total mastectomy: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The randomized trials which include ACOSOG Z0011 and IBCSG 23-01 had found that the survival rates were not different in patients with cT1/2N0 and 1-2 sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive, macro/micrometastases who underwent breast-conserving therapy, and micrometastases who underwent total mastectomy (TM), when axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was omitted. However, for patients with cT1/2N0 and 1-2 SLN macrometastases who underwent TM; there was still insufficient evidence from clinical studies to support whether ALND can be exempted. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of non-sentinel lymph node (nSLN) metastasis in breast cancer patients with 1-2 SLN macrometastases undergoing TM. METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 1491 breast cancer patients who underwent TM and SLNB from January 2017 to February 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze the risk factors for nSLN metastasis. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients with 1-2 SLN macrometastases who underwent TM were enrolled. Postoperative pathological data showed that 35.2% patients had nSLN metastasis. The results of multivariate analysis indicated that tumor size (TS) (P = 0.002; OR: 1.051; 95% CI: 1.019-1.084) and ratio of SLN macrometastases (P = 0.0001; OR: 12.597: 95% CI: 4.302-36.890) were the independent risk factors for nSLN metastasis in breast cancer patients with 1-2 SLN macrometastases that underwent TM. The ROC curve analysis suggested that when TS ≤22 mm and ratio of SLN macrometastases ≤0.33, the incidence of nSLN metastasis could be reduced to 17.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The breast cancer patients with cT1/2N0 stage, undergoing TM and 1-2 SLN macrometastases, when the TS ≤22 mm and macrometastatic SLN does not exceed 1/3 of the total number of detected SLN, the incidence of nSLN metastasis is significantly reduced, but whether ALND can be exempted needs further exploration.

Effectiveness Without Efficacy: Cautionary Tale from a Landmark Breast Cancer Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: "Old" randomized controlled trials established breast conserving therapy (BCT) and total mastectomy (TM) equivalence for treating early breast cancer, whereas recent literature report improved survival with BCT. To reconcile this, we performed a simulation study and re-analyzed B-06 trial data. Methods: We estimated the distributions for overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence functions for breast-cancer-specific death (BCSD) and other causes-specific death (OCSD) by BCT and TM. The restricted mean survival time (RMST) difference and hazard ratio between the two arms were estimated. Given the estimated distributions, we simulated cause-specific death times from each arm, evaluating the power to test treatment difference in OS, BCSD, and OCSD with different sample sizes, follow-up times, and a modified setting by simulating BCT-arm OCSD times from the distribution of patients not receiving radiation. Results: With 200 months follow-up, the average BCT-over-TM gain measured by RMST was 3.7 months for OS and 4.5 months for BCSD. Increasing the trial size to 5,000 per arm, there is a 79.2% chance to detect the OS benefit with RMST and 92.4% for BCSD. A nonproportional increase of OCSD in BCT compared to TM was observed after 144 months, and particularly after 200 months post treatments. When OCSD times of BCT were simulated using patients not receiving radiation, the estimated OS gain increased to 4.4 months, and the power increased to 92.2%. Conclusions: The late excess other-cause-death, likely due to radiation, in the BCT arm and sample size constraints limited the power to report BCT superiority. Given radiation delivered in the era of B-06 trial, BCT and TM remain largely equivalent.

Axilla lymph node dissection can be safely omitted in patients with 1-2 positive sentinel nodes receiving mastectomy: a large multi-institutional study and a systemic meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate whether axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be omitted in patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) who received total mastectomy (TM). METHODS: Consecutive breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive SLNs were retrospectively reviewed from a multi-institutional database. Patients were divided into sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) group and ALND group. Administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and survival were compared between groups. To further verify the results, a meta-analysis was also conducted. RESULTS: Among the 1161 enrolled patients, 893 (76.9%) received ALND and 268 (23.1%) underwent SLNB alone. Administration of chemotherapy was comparable between the two groups (91.1% vs. 90.6%, P = 0.798), which was consistent in TM (P = 0.638) and BCS cohort (P = 0.576). After a median follow-up of 36 months, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in recurrence-free survival (P = 0.583) regardless of surgery of breast. During further meta-analysis, 13 out of 4733 relative studies reported the association of axillary surgery and disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) in 1-2 positive SLNs patients. Pooled analysis showed no difference in adjusted DFS (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70-1.02) or OS (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.93-1.11) between SLNB and ALND groups. Survival benefit of ALND remained non-significant after restricting the analysis in four studies with patients only receiving BCS, or in three studies with patients only receiving TM. CONCLUSION: Further ALND does not impact adjuvant chemotherapy administration or disease outcome in breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive SLNs treated with TM.

Breast-conserving surgery with whole breast radiation therapy has a subsequent lower mood disorder incidence rate than total mastectomy in early-stage breast cancer patients: a nationwide population-based longitudinal study.

PURPOSE: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by whole breast radiation therapy (BCS-WBRT) or total mastectomy without WBRT (TM-no-WBRT) is the primary treatment for early stage breast cancer patients. Our study aimed to identify which early stage breast cancer treatment strategies had a subsequent lower incidence rate of mood disorder over a period of 10 years after the primary treatment. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study consisted of newly diagnosed early stage breast cancer patients in Taiwan from 2000 to 2013 using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We used a 1:1 propensity score matching by age to enrol patients into the BCS-WBRT and TM-no-WBRT groups. Statistical analyses were performed to calculate the hazard ratio and cumulative incidence rate. RESULTS: Our study consisted of 876 BCS-WBRT patients and 1949 TM-no-WBRT patients. After propensity score matching, each study group included 876 patients. The results showed that the mood disorder incidence rate was lower in the BCS-WBRT group than in the TM-no-WBRT group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the BCS-WBRT group had a decreased risk of developing mood disorder (adjusted hazard ratio 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.90, p < 0.01). Furthermore, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the BCS-WBRT group had a lower cumulative incidence rate of mood disorder, especially depression, after undergoing 10 years of primary treatment (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that BCS-WBRT was associated with a lower risk of development of mood disorder over a 10-year period compared to TM-no-WBRT in early stage breast cancer patients. Our findings may provide helpful information, along with other clinical data, for breast cancer patients as they choose the type of appropriate surgery for treatment.

Anesthesia With Propofol Sedation Reduces Locoregional Recurrence in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Total Mastectomy Compared With Non-Propofol Anesthesia.

Purpose: We examined locoregional recurrence (LRR) in patients with breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) receiving total mastectomy (TM) under propofol-based paravertebral block-regional anesthesia (PB-RA) versus sevoflurane-based inhalational general anesthesia (INHA-GA) without propofol. All-cause death and distant metastasis were secondary endpoints. Patients and Methods: Patients with breast IDC receiving TM were recruited through propensity score matching and categorized into INHA-GA with sevoflurane and PB-RA with propofol groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the adjusted HR (aHR; 95% CI) of LRR for the PB-RA with propofol group was 0.52 (0.28-0.96) compared with the INHA-GA with sevoflurane group. The aHRs of LRR for differentiation grade II, grade III, the American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage II, stage III, pathological tumor (pT) stage 2, pT stage 3-4, pathological nodal (pN) stage 1, and pN stage 2-3 were 1.16 (1.04-2.08), 1.28 (1.07-2.12), 3.71 (1.82-7.59), 4.67 (1.65-13.18), 1.09 (1.02-1.21), 1.17 (1.03-2.16), 1.10 (1.03-1.33), and 1.22 (1.06-2.41), respectively, compared with differentiation grade I, clinical stage I, pT1, and pN0. The aHR of LRR for adjuvant RT was 0.88 (0.64-0.94) compared with that for no adjuvant RT. Conclusion: PB-RA with propofol might be beneficial for reducing LRR in women with breast IDC receiving TM compared with INHA-GA without propofol.

Adjuvant postmastectomy radiotherapy might be associated with better survival in women with heart failure receiving total mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: To date, no data on the effect of adjuvant postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) on oncologic outcomes, such as all-cause death, locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM), are available in women with left-side breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 646 women with left-breast IDC at clinical stages I-IIIC and HFrEF receiving radical total mastectomy (TM) followed by adjuvant PMRT or non-adjuvant PMRT. We categorized them into two groups based on their adjuvant PMRT status and compared their overall survival (OS), LRR, and DM outcomes. We calculated the propensity score and applied inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to create a pseudo-study cohort. Furthermore, we performed a multivariate analysis of the propensity score-weighted population to obtain hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: In the IPTW-adjusted model, adjuvant PMRT (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.74) was a significant independent prognostic factor for all-cause death (P = 0.0003), and the aHR (95% CI) of LRR and DM for adjuvant PMRT was 0.90 (0.79-0.96; P = 0.0356) and 0.89 (0.54-1.50; P = 0.6854), respectively, compared with the nonadjuvant PMRT group. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant PMRT was associated with a decrease in all-cause death, and LRR in women with left IDC and HFrEF compared with nonadjuvant PMRT.

Differences in Preoperative Health-Related Quality of Life between Women Receiving Mastectomy or Breast Conserving Surgery in a Prospectively Recruited Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.

As rates of total mastectomy rise, the relationships between surgery modality with domains of health-related quality of life is not well understood. This study reports differences in depression, anxiety, pain, and health status among a cohort of women scheduled to receive total mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery. Patient-reported outcomes measured preoperative differences between patients receiving total mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery in a cross-sectional design. Regression analyses was used to model health outcomes and adjust for patient demographics on patient measures. Participants scheduled for total mastectomy were more likely to report more severe symptoms of depression and anxiety. This association was non-significant after adjusting for demographic differences. Younger participants were more likely to be scheduled for total mastectomy. Age was negatively associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety. Screening patients for mental health symptoms may be particularly important among younger patients who were more likely to report depression and anxiety before their surgery and were more likely to receive total mastectomy.

[Therapeutic de-escalation in breast cancer surgery]. / Désescalade thérapeutique dans le cancer du sein en chirurgie oncologique.

The surgical management of breast cancer has been marked by a therapeutic de-escalation from radical surgery to breast conservation and from axillary curage to sentinel lymph node sampling. With regard to breast surgery, the de-escalation of treatment has been largely due to organized screening, which has made it possible to diagnose tumors of smaller volume or at an earlier stage. The indications for conservative surgery have been broadened by the addition of radiotherapy on one hand, and the introduction of adjuvant and neo-adjuvant treatments on the other hand. In an effort to de-escalate surgery, totally non-invasive techniques such as radiofrequency, HIFU (High Intensity Focused Ultrasound) or cryotherapy have been tested. Currently, three trials are underway to evaluate active surveillance, without surgery, in the management of certain low-risk ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS). Regarding axillary procedures, the sentinel node technique has allowed axillary staging in patients with early breast cancer without clinical or radiological lymph node involvement. Currently, international recommendations (ASCO, NCCN) and the consensus of experts in St Gallen do not recommend additional curage in cases of macro or micrometastatic invasion of the sentinel lymph nodes if the criteria of ACOSOG Z0011 are met. The question now arises as to the relevance of a biopsy of suspected axillary nodes during the initial workup and the usefulness of the sentinel node technique in the case of a negative initial workup.

Local treatment for triple-negative breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: breast-conserving surgery or total mastectomy?

BACKGROUND: Because there is no exact therapeutic target, the systemic treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) still relies on chemotherapy. In terms of local treatment, based on the highly malignant characteristics of TNBC, it is still uncertain whether patients should be given more aggressive local treatment. METHODS: This study was based on the SEER database. 13,262 TNBC patients undergoing chemotherapy were included. According to local treatment methods, patients were divided into breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy (BCS + RT), total mastectomy alone and total mastectomy with radiotherapy (Mastectomy+RT). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis drew the survival curves of Overall Survival (OS) and Breast Cancer Specific Survival (BCSS), and Cox proportional risk regression models were used to analyze the impact of different local treatments on OS and BCSS. RESULTS: After adjusting confounding factors, Mastectomy alone group (HR = 1.57; 95%CI: 1.40-1.77) and Mastectomy+RT group (HR = 1.28; 95%CI: 1.12-1.46) were worse in OS than BCS + RT group, and Mastectomy+RT group (HR = 0.81; 95%CI: 0.73-0.91) was better in OS than Mastectomy alone group. The effect of local treatment for BCSS was similar to that of OS. After stratification according to age, tumor size and lymph node status, when the age was less than 55 years old, at T4, N2 or N3 category, there was no statistical significance between the BCS + RT group and the Mastectomy+RT group in OS or BCSS (all P > 0.05). When the age was less than 65 years old, at T1, T2 or N0 category, there was no statistical significance between the Mastectomy alone group and the Mastectomy+RT group in OS or BCSS (all P > 0.05). The results of other stratified analyses were basically consistent with the results of total population analysis. CONCLUSION: The survival benefit of breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy was higher than or similar to that of total mastectomy TNBC patients.

Pagets disease of the breast - observational retrospective study of the past 20 years.

INTRODUCTION: Pagets disease of the breast (PD) is a rare type of carcinoma that affects the skin of the nipple-areolar complex. Unresolved issues exist regarding its diagnosis and therapy. The aim of the study was to gather data on how the therapy of the disease is approached in clinical practice, and to formulate current diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of data from medical records of patients with PD who underwent surgery at our department between 2001 and 2020. The data was evaluated using basic statistical methods. RESULTS: Sixty four female patients with the mean age of 62.5 years. In 58 women, PD was confirmed before surgery, with the median of 20 weeks from initial symptoms to diagnosis. Forty seven of the patients were operated for presumed isolated PD; in 38 cases, histopathological evaluation of the specimen revealed an associated malignancy in the mammary gland. Primary breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was performed in 46 patients; surgical revision was indicated in 17 cases. In 6 patients with PD associated with non-invasive breast cancer treated by BCS without radiotherapy (RT), a local recurrence appeared in 3 cases, which is significantly more compared to the group of patients undergoing total mastectomies (p=0.032). No local recurrence appeared in 9 cases of isolated PD treated by BCS, including 6 patients without RT. The tumors associated with PD were mostly ER-negative (44/57) and HER2-positive (22/25). CONCLUSION: In cases where PD is suspected, careful clinical examination and the use of available diagnostic imaging techniques including MRI are appropriate. BCS without RT is not an adequate oncological therapy where an associated malignancy of the breast is found.

Local Recurrence in Young Women with Breast Cancer: Breast Conserving Therapy vs. Mastectomy Alone.

We compared the cumulative incidence of local recurrence in young patients (≤40 years) with breast cancer between breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy alone. Among 428 women with early-stage breast cancer who were treated between 2001 and 2012, 311 underwent BCT and 117 underwent mastectomy alone. Adjuvant systemic treatments were administered to 409 patients (95.6%). We compared the cumulative incidence of LR and survival rates between two groups. During a median follow-up period of 91 months, the 10-year cumulative incidence of LR was 9.3% (median interval of 36.5 months from surgery). Patients treated with BCT tended to have a higher risk for local recurrence (11.1% for BCT vs. 4.1% for mastectomy alone, p = 0.078). All patients with isolated LR after BCT (n = 23) underwent salvage mastectomy followed by systemic treatments. The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival of patients with isolated LR after BCT were 44.2% and 82.2%, respectively. The BCT group exhibited an approximately 2.5-fold higher risk of LR than mastectomy alone group. Patients with isolated LR after BCT showed poor prognosis despite undergoing aggressive salvage treatments. The development of novel treatments should be investigated to reduce LR for improving prognosis and preserving cosmetic outcomes in young women.

Higher Risk of Depression After Total Mastectomy Versus Breast Reconstruction Among Adult Women With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaregression.

This systematic review with a meta-regression was conducted to determine the risk of depression after mastectomy compared to breast reconstruction among women with breast cancer 1 year after surgery. A literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines using 4 databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Library for the period January 2000 to March 2019. Studies that measured the status of depression within 1 year and immediately after surgery were included. Outcomes related to depression were analyzed by using a pool of event rates and a risk ratio of 95% confidence interval (CI), P value, and a fitting model based on the results of a heterogeneity test of mastectomy and BR. The statistical analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-analysis 3.0 software. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. There were 865 cases of mastectomy only, with a 22.2% risk of depression (95% CI, 12.4-36.2). In 869 women who underwent BR, the risk of depression was 15.7% (95% CI, 8.8-26.2). The depression risk ratio for mastectomy compared to BR was 1.36 (95% CI, 1.11-1.65). Patients with delayed reconstruction exhibited lower levels of depression (risk ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.57-1.01). The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scale showed high sensitivity, and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) with a cutoff of > 7 could measure even low to moderate depressive symptoms. One in 4 women with breast cancer had symptoms of depression after mastectomy; both surgeries were associated with depression in women 1 year after surgery. Our results will permit the development of proactive treatment plans before and after surgery to mitigate risk and prevent depression through the use of sensitive depression scales like BDI.

Uncommon Tumors and Uncommon Presentations of Cancer in the Breast.

Purpose of review: The purpose is to present a case series of rare diagnoses and unusual presentations of breast lesions with radiologic-pathologic correlation from a major cancer center, and to review the recent literature on each entity with a focus on radiology-pathology concordance. We present our findings and experience from cases of metastatic small cell lung carcinoma to the breast, IgG-4 related breast disease, breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma, granular cell tumor, pleomorphic sarcoma, adenomyoepithelioma, post-radiation angiosarcoma, and breast carcinoma after risk-reducing total mastectomy. Recent findings: It is essential for physicians to have knowledge of rare breast diagnoses and unusual breast disease presentations to formulate a complete differential diagnosis, recognize radiological-pathological concordance of these entities and provide appropriate patient care. Summary: Current literature on these rare described entities exists mainly as case reports, case series and small-scale studies. By sharing our findings, we hope to educate trainees in radiology, pathology and other fields across the continuum of care in radiologic-pathologic correlation, while also augmenting the existing literature on these rare entities.