RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This prospective study in a real-world setting investigated the feasibility and safety of S-1 plus nimotuzumab (S-1-Nimo) based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC) patients who failed to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy. METHODS: LA-ESCC patients who failed to converse to resectable disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy were enrolled to receive the 4-week S-1-Nimo regimen of radiotherapy (40 Gy in 20 fractions, 5 days per week), S-1 chemotherapy, and nimotuzumab. Then, after surgical assessments, patients evaluated as resectable disease received surgery; patients with unresectable disease continued to receive definitive radiotherapy (50-60 Gy in 25-30 fractions, 5 days per week) concurrently with S-1-Nimo. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were enrolled and evaluated. The median follow-up time was 23.2 months. Median EFS was 9.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-14.0) months, with an estimated 2-year EFS rate of 24.2%. The median overall survival (OS) and the estimated OS rate at 2 years were 13.4 (95% CI, 10.3-17.5) months and 31.2%, respectively. Twelve underwent surgery, with a surgical conversion rate of 18.8% and an R0 resection rate of 100.0%. Subgroup analysis identified the significantly prolonged EFS and OS in patients who experienced radical surgery (median EFS, not reached vs. 8.7 months; p = .0117. median OS, 24.9 vs. 10.6 months; p = .0205) as compared to those treated with CCRT. Of 64 patients, grade 3 adverse events mainly included radiation esophagitis (4.7%), anemia (1.6%), and thrombocytopenia (1.6%). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the reasonable efficacy and promising safety of the S-1-Nimo-based CCRT in LA-ESCC patients with failure to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Quimioradioterapia , Combinación de Medicamentos , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Ácido Oxónico , Tegafur , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/mortalidad , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
This study aimed to survey the efficacy of chemotherapy regimens in the real world setting and explore the most promising regimen for patients experiencing early recurrence for gastric cancer. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical course of 207 patients with gastric cancer, who developed early recurrence during or within 6 months after completing S-1 adjuvant therapy at 19 Japanese institutions between 2012 and 2016. The treatment regimens after recurrence were fluoropyrimidines plus platinum-based regimens (FP) in 91 (44%) patients, paclitaxel-based regimens (PTX) in 102 (49%), and irinotecan-based regimens (IRI) in 14 (7%). The overall response and disease control rates were 28.7% and 54.1%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.1 and 12.9 months, respectively. In the FP, PTX, and IRI regimens, the median PFS and OS were 5.9, 4.1, 4.1 months and 12.8, 12.9, and 11.8 months, respectively. The combination of PTX and ramucirumab showed survival comparable to capecitabine plus platinum. Multivariate analyses for OS showed that recurrence during adjuvant chemotherapy and undifferentiated histological type were independent poor prognostic factors. Although the prognosis of patients with early recurrence even with adjuvant S-1 was poor, PTX plus ramucirumab therapy could be a potential treatment option.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Combinación de Medicamentos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Ácido Oxónico , Neoplasias Gástricas , Tegafur , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , RamucirumabRESUMEN
Background: ß-glucan has been reported to be a potential natural immune modulator for tumor growth inhibition. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ß-glucan plus immunotherapy and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods: This is a phase IB, prospective, single-arm, investigator-initiated trail. Advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients received ß-glucan, camrelizumab, oxaliplatin, oral S-1 every 3 weeks. The curative effect was evaluated every 2 cycles. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety, with secondary endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS). The exploratory endpoint explored biomarkers of response to treatment efficacy. Results: A total of 30 patients had been enrolled, including 20 (66.7%) males and all patients with an ECOG PS score of ≥1. The ORR was 60%, the mPFS was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.52-11.27), the mOS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 11.09-16.91). A total of 19 patients (63.3%) had TRAEs, with 9 patients (30%) with grade ≥ 3. The most common TRAEs were nausea (53.3%). After 2 cycles of treatment, the levels of IL-2, IFN-γ and CD4+ T cells significantly increased (P < 0.05). Furthermore, biomarker analysis indicated that patient with better response and longer OS exhibited lower GZMA expression at baseline serum. Conclusions: This preliminary study demonstrates that ß-glucan plus camrelizumab and SOX chemotherapy offers favorable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, and further studies are needed to verify its efficacy and safety. Clinical Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, identifier ChiCTR2100044088.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Oxaliplatino , Neoplasias Gástricas , beta-Glucanos , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Adulto , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , beta-Glucanos/uso terapéutico , beta-Glucanos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/efectos adversos , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/efectos adversos , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: Although perioperative chemotherapy has improved patient survival, sarcopenia may occur during chemotherapy owing to decreased food intake and physical strength. However, reports on the occurrence of sarcopenia and changes in body composition in patients with pancreatic cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy are scarce. This study aimed to determine the effect of changes in skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy clinical course in patients who underwent perioperative chemotherapy and surgical resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 159 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgical resection, followed by S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. We evaluated changes in skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemotherapy using abdominal computed tomography and the SliceOmatic software. The association between the rate of change in skeletal muscle mass index (Δ%SMI) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was investigated. RESULTS: Eighty-eight (55.3%) patients lost skeletal muscle mass (Δ%SMI <0) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a significantly low S-1 adjuvant completion rate (p=0.02). Δ%SMI <0 was an independent risk factor for the continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio=1.924, 95% confidence interval=1.002-3.695, p=0.049). Moreover, the lower the Δ%SMI, the lower the S-1 continuation rate (p=0.022). CONCLUSION: Loss of skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer affected the continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreatic resection. Therefore, ameliorating loss of skeletal muscle mass during neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be carefully considered to improve the continuation rate of adjuvant chemotherapy and the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer.
Asunto(s)
Combinación de Medicamentos , Músculo Esquelético , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Ácido Oxónico , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Sarcopenia , Tegafur , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Masculino , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/efectos adversos , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Músculo Esquelético/efectos de los fármacos , Músculo Esquelético/patología , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcopenia/inducido químicamente , Sarcopenia/etiología , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of the combination of raltitrexed, S-1 (RS), and fruquintinib with the combination of RS and bevacizumab in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort included mCRC patients who received the RS plus fruquintinib or regorafenib as the third-line therapy from May 2019 to April 2023. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to balance the baseline characteristics of all patients. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and safety of the two regimens were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 153 patients enrolled, 123 patients received the RS plus bevacizumab and 30 patients received the RS plus fruquintinib. After PSM, 30 pairs were analyzed. Patients treated with RS plus fruquintinib had a longer PFS than those treated with RS plus bevacizumab before PSM (5.0 months vs. 4.3 months, p = 0.008) and after PSM (5.0 months vs. 4.4 months, p = 0.012). A longer OS was also observed in RS plus fruquintinib group before PSM and after PSM, but there was no statistic difference between two groups after PSM. Both objective response rate and disease control rate were higher in the RS plus fruquintinib cohort than those in the RS plus bevacizumab cohort before PSM, and the difference in values between the two groups reduced after PSM. The adverse effects (AEs) of both groups were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In patients with refractory mCRC, RS plus fruquintinib demonstrated a superior OS, PFS than RS plus bevacizumab and had manageable AEs.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bevacizumab , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Combinación de Medicamentos , Puntaje de Propensión , Quinazolinas , Tegafur , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quinazolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinazolinas/efectos adversos , Quinazolinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/efectos adversos , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/efectos adversos , Benzofuranos/uso terapéutico , Benzofuranos/administración & dosificación , Benzofuranos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Supervivencia sin Progresión , TiofenosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Explore the efficacy and safety of involved-field irradiation (IFI) combined with S-1 as definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) for locally advanced elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), under the premise of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS: We designed a prospective single-arm phase II study. The study enrolled 91 patients aged 75 to 92 years. Eligible participants had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma, stage II to IV disease based on the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). All elderly patients (EPs) received dCRT with S-1. which was administered orally twice daily for 28 days. The radiotherapy dose was 61.2 Gy delivered in 34 fractions or 50.4 Gy delivered in 28 fractions. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), local control rate (LCR), and safety. RESULTS: From July 2017 to July 2021, we enrolled EPs with ESCC who were treated at the Jiangsu Cancer hospital. As of August 1, 2023, the median follow-up of surviving EPs was 31.4 months (IQR: 25.2 to 72.6 months). 83 patients (91.2%) completed the whole course of treatment. The 2-year OS rate was 59.2%, and the PFS rate was 43.7%. The most common grade 1 to 2 adverse effects (AEs) were radiation esophagitis (79.1%), and then were radiation pneumonia (46.2%). Anemia (41.8%) was the most common of grade 1 to 2 hematologic toxicity. The incidence of grade 3 or above AEs was 24.2%, and the incidence of leukopenia was the highest (11.0%). There was not one death due to treatment-related toxicity. In a subgroup analysis of radiotherapy doses, we found no statistically significant differences in PFS (P = 0.465) and OS (P = 0.345) in EPs with ESCC who received 50.4 Gy and 61.2 Gy, and that patients in the 50.4 Gy group had lower dermatitis (P = 0.045) and anemia (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: IF-IMRT combined with S-1 is a promising regimen for elderly ESCC. And the radiotherapy dose of 50.4 Gy remains the standard dose for EPs with ESCC undergoing CCRT.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia , Combinación de Medicamentos , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Ácido Oxónico , Tegafur , Humanos , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of concurrent hypofractionated radiotherapy plus anti-PD-1 antibody and SOX chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) after failure of first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with pathologically confirmed mPC who failed standard first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients were treated with a regimen of hypofractionated radiotherapy, SOX chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors at our institution. We collected the patients' clinical information and outcome measurements. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was the primary endpoint of the study, followed by disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (mOS) and safety. Exploratory analyses included biomarkers related to the benefits. RESULTS: Between February 24, 2021, and August 30, 2023, twenty-five patients were enrolled in the study, and twenty-three patients who received at least one dose of the study agent had objective efficacy evaluation. The mPFS was 5.48 months, the mOS was 6.57 months, and the DCR and ORR were 69.5% and 30.4%, respectively. Among the seven patients who achieved a PR, the median duration of the response was 7.41 months. On-treatment decreased serum CA19-9 levels were associated with better overall survival. Besides, pretreatment inflammatory markers were associated with tumor response and survival. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically meaningful antitumor activity and favorable safety profiles were demonstrated after treatment with these combination therapies in patients with refractory mPC. On-treatment decreased serum CA19-9 levels and pretreatment inflammatory markers platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) might be biomarkers related to clinical benefits. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=130211 , identifier: ChiCTR2100049799, date of registration: 2021-08-09.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Gemcitabina , Metástasis de la NeoplasiaRESUMEN
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) presents significant clinical and therapeutic challenges due to its aggressive nature and generally poor prognosis. We initiated a Phase II clinical trial (ChiCTR1900027160) to assess the efficacy of a pioneering neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy regimen comprising programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade (Toripalimab), nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel), and the oral fluoropyrimidine derivative S-1, in patients with locally advanced ESCC. This study uniquely integrates clinical outcomes with advanced spatial proteomic profiling using Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC) to elucidate the dynamics within the tumor microenvironment (TME), focusing on the mechanistic interplay of resistance and response. Sixty patients participated, receiving the combination therapy prior to surgical resection. Our findings demonstrated a major pathological response (MPR) in 62% of patients and a pathological complete response (pCR) in 29%. The IMC analysis provided a detailed regional assessment, revealing that the spatial arrangement of immune cells, particularly CD8+ T cells and B cells within tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS), and S100A9+ inflammatory macrophages in fibrotic regions are predictive of therapeutic outcomes. Employing machine learning approaches, such as support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) analysis, we identified critical spatial features linked to drug resistance and developed predictive models for drug response, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 97%. These insights underscore the vital role of integrating spatial proteomics into clinical trials to dissect TME dynamics thoroughly, paving the way for personalized and precise cancer treatment strategies in ESCC. This holistic approach not only enhances our understanding of the mechanistic basis behind drug resistance but also sets a robust foundation for optimizing therapeutic interventions in ESCC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Proteómica , Microambiente Tumoral , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/inmunología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Proteómica/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Albúminas , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Combinación de Medicamentos , TegafurRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The clinical effectiveness of triple chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine, cisplatin plus either S-1 (GCS), durvalumab (DGC), or pembrolizumab (PGC) as first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has been reported. However, their comparative cost-effectiveness is unclear. We conducted a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Japanese healthcare payer. METHODS: A 10-year partitioned survival model was constructed by comparing the time-dependent hazards of the KHBO1401-MITSUBA, TOPAZ-1, and KEYNOTE-966 trials. The cost and utility came from previously published reports. Quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were used to measure the effects on health. Costs for direct medical care were taken into account. There was a one-way analysis and a probability sensitivity analysis. A willingness-to-pay threshold of 7.5 million yen (57,034 USD) per QALY was defined. RESULTS: The incremental costs per QALY for GCS, DGC, and PGC in the base case study were 3,779,374 JPY (28,740 USD), 86,058,056 JPY (65,4434 USD), and 28,982,059 JPY (220,396 USD), respectively. No parameter had an influence beyond the threshold in a one-way sensitivity analysis. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis revealed that the probability of GCS, DGC, and PGC being cost-effective at the threshold was 85.6%, 0%, and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Given the current circumstances, it is probable that triple therapy utilizing GCS will emerge as a plausible and efficient primary chemotherapy strategy for patients with advanced BTC in the Japanese healthcare system, as opposed to DGC and PGC.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar , Cisplatino , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Desoxicitidina , Combinación de Medicamentos , Gemcitabina , Ácido Oxónico , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Tegafur , Humanos , Cisplatino/economía , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/economía , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/patología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/economía , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/economía , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/economía , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , JapónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nivolumab + chemotherapy is now a standard of care for HER2-negative, previously untreated, unresectable or recurrent gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (advanced gastric cancer), but long-term follow-up data of clinical trials are limited. METHODS: ATTRACTON-4 was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Patients were randomized to either nivolumab or placebo, both combined with the physician's choice of SOX (oral S-1 [tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium] + oxaliplatin) or CAPOX (capecitabine + oxaliplatin). We report the primary endpoints-centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)-and landmark analyses of OS among patients alive using 3-year follow-up data. RESULTS: At the cutoff date (May 10, 2021), 17/359 patients in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group and 6/358 in the placebo + chemotherapy group were continuing study treatment. PFS (centrally assessed) was longer in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group (median 10.94 vs. 8.48 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-0.82). Although OS did not differ between the two groups (median 17.45 vs. 17.15 months; HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.75-1.05), the landmark analysis of OS, calculating HRs at each landmark time point (every month), was getting numerically better in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group over time. Approximately 80% of patients who achieved complete response in the nivolumab + chemotherapy group were alive at 3 years. No new safety signals or major late-onset select treatment-related adverse events were observed for nivolumab + chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This 3-year follow-up of ATTRACTION-4 confirmed the long-term clinical benefit and manageable safety of nivolumab + chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02746796.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Unión Esofagogástrica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Nivolumab , Receptor ErbB-2 , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Nivolumab/uso terapéutico , Nivolumab/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Método Doble Ciego , Unión Esofagogástrica/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios de Seguimiento , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
A 36-year-old woman presented to our hospital with a complaint of melena. Examinations revealed type 3 gastric cancer with left supraclavicular lymph node(Virchow's node)and para-aortic lymph node(PAN)metastases. The patient was treated with S-1 and CDDP combination chemotherapy. After 2 courses of chemotherapy, the lymph node metastases were significantly reduced. Subsequently, a total gastrectomy with D2 plus PAN dissection was performed. Histopathological examination revealed the complete absence of cancer cells in both the primary lesion of the stomach and all dissected lymph nodes. No additional surgery or radiation therapy was performed for Virchow's node metastasis. Postoperatively, she received S-1 chemotherapy for 2.5 years. She remains well 9.5 years after the surgery, without any evidence of recurrent disease.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Combinación de Medicamentos , Gastrectomía , Metástasis Linfática , Ácido Oxónico , Neoplasias Gástricas , Tegafur , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Femenino , Adulto , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Factores de Tiempo , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Escisión del Ganglio LinfáticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are no reports of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal oligometastases. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 70-year-old man with gastric cancer and peritoneal oligometastases received concurrent adaptive radiotherapy and oral S-1. After radiotherapy, S-1 was discontinued, and 2 years later the tumor had completely regressed, with no recurrence or metastasis 6 years after radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Peritoneal oligometastatic gastric cancer may be a candidate for curative treatment with concurrent adaptive radiotherapy and oral S-1.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia , Ácido Oxónico , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Neoplasias Gástricas , Tegafur , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Anciano , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Cisplatino , Humanos , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Femenino , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Combinación de MedicamentosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Encouraging antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) has been shown in several small-scale studies. This study compared the efficacy and safety of AS versus standard-of-care nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, phase II trial, eligible patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic PC were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; S-1 twice daily on days 1 through 14) or AG (nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Between July 16, 2019, and September 9, 2022, 62 patients (AS, nâ =â 32; AG, nâ =â 30) were treated and evaluated. With a median follow-up of 8.36 months at preplanned interim analysis (data cutoff, March 24, 2023), the median PFS (8.48 vs 4.47 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.402; Pâ =â .002) and overall survival (OS; 13.73 vs 9.59 months; HR, 0.226; Pâ <â .001) in the AS group were significantly longer compared to the AG group. More patients had objective response in the AS group than AG group (37.50% vs 6.67%; Pâ =â .005). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia and leucopenia in both groups, and gamma glutamyl transferase increase was observed only in the AG group. CONCLUSION: The first-line AS regimen significantly extended both PFS and OS of Chinese patients with advanced PC when compared with the AG regimen, with a comparable safety profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03636308).
Asunto(s)
Albúminas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Desoxicitidina , Combinación de Medicamentos , Gemcitabina , Ácido Oxónico , Paclitaxel , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Tegafur , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/farmacología , Femenino , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/efectos adversos , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Albúminas/efectos adversos , Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , AdultoRESUMEN
Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) and FOLFIRINOX are widely used as first-line regimens for unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC). When GnP therapy is selected, considering patient age or condition, second-line FOLFIRINOX is sometimes difficult to administer owing to its toxicity. This study aimed to determine the recommended dose (RD) of S-IROX (S-1, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan combination) regimens in patients with unresectable PC after first-line GnP failure. This phase-I study used the "3 + 3" dose-escalation design with two dose levels. Patients who failed first-line GnP therapy for unresectable PC were enrolled. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan were administered on day 1, and S-1 was administered orally twice daily on days 1-7, followed by 7 days of rest. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and determination of RD. The secondary endpoint was the evaluation of potential antitumor activity. Nine patients received the second-line S-IROX regimen. In level-0 (S-1, 80 mg/m2; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2; and irinotecan, 120 mg/m2), no patient experienced DLT; however, one patient experienced grade 3 neutropenia. At level-1 (irinotecan increased to 150 mg/m2), one of six patients experienced DLTs, including G3 diarrhea. The RD was confirmed at the level-1 dose. The response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 33.3%, 77.8%, 172 (range:77-422) days, and 414 (101-685) days, respectively. One patient underwent surgery after the second-line S-IROX therapy. Second-line S-IROX treatment was deemed acceptable. The RD was set at level-1 dose (S-1, 80 mg/m2; oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2; and irinotecan, 150 mg/m2).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Paclitaxel , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Albúminas/administración & dosificación , Albúminas/uso terapéutico , Albúminas/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Gemcitabina , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/efectos adversos , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/efectos adversos , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/efectos adversos , Tegafur/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe the real-world treatment patterns of systemic therapies for biliary tract cancer (BTC) and to examine the frequency and management of biliary infection in Japan. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with BTC and prescribed systemic therapy between January 2011 and September 2020 were retrieved from the Japanese Medical Data Vision database. The look-back period was set to 5 years. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and biliary infection-induced treatment interruption were analyzed. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 22 742 patients with a mean age of 71.0 years and 61.6% were male. The most common BTC type was extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (44.6%). The three most common first-line regimens were S-1 monotherapy (33.0%), gemcitabine+cisplatin (32.5%), and gemcitabine monotherapy (18.7%) over the entire observation period (January 2011-September 2021). Patients who received monotherapies tended to be older. Biliary infection-induced treatment interruption occurred in 29.5% of patients, with a median time to onset of 64.0 (interquartile range 29.0-145.0) days. The median duration of intravenous antibiotics was 12.0 (interquartile range 4.0-92.0) days. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated potential challenges of BTC in Japanese clinical practice particularly use of multiple regimens, commonly monotherapies, which are not recommended as first-line treatment, and the management of biliary infections during systemic therapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Japón , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Gemcitabina , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Adjuvant oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) chemotherapy for gastric cancer (GC) after D2 gastrectomy has been proven effective. There has yet to be a study that evaluates adjuvant nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) plus S-1. In this single-center, retrospective study, GC patients after D2 gastrectomy received either nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS group) or SOX group were recruited between January 2018 and December 2020 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University. Intravenous nab-paclitaxel 120 mg/m2 or 260 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 were administered as eight 3 week cycle, especially in the AS and SOX group. Patients received S-1 twice daily with a dose of 40 mg/m2 in the two groups on days 1-14 of each cycle. The end points were disease-free survival (DFS) rate at 3 years and adverse events (AEs). There were 56 eligible patients, 28 in the AS group and 35 in the SOX group. The 3 year DFS rate was 78.0% in AS group versus 70.7% in SOX group (p = 0.46). Subgroup analysis showed that the patients with signet-ring positive in the AS group had a prolonged DFS compared with the SOX group (40.0 vs. 13.8 m, p = 0.02). The diffuse-type GC or low differentiation in the AS group was associated with numerically prolonged DFS compared with the SOX group, but the association was not statistically significant (p = 0.27 and p = 0.15 especially). Leukopenia (14.3%) were the most prevalent AEs in the AS group, while thrombocytopenia (28.5%) in the SOX group. Neutropenia (7.1% in AS group) and thrombocytopenia (22.8% in SOX group) were the most common grade 3 or 4 AEs. In this study analyzing past data, a tendency towards a greater 3 year DFS was observed when using AS regimen in signet-ring positive patients. AS group had fewer thrombocytopenia compared to SOX group. More studies should be conducted with larger sample sizes.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Combinación de Medicamentos , Gastrectomía , Oxaliplatino , Ácido Oxónico , Neoplasias Gástricas , Tegafur , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/efectos adversos , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/efectos adversos , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Paclitaxel Unido a Albúmina/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel Unido a Albúmina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Albúminas/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The phase III PRODIGY study demonstrated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy (CSC) improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with surgery followed by adjuvant S-1 (SC) for patients with resectable locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) with clinical T2-3N+ or T4Nany disease. The primary end point was PFS. Overall survival (OS) was the secondary end point. We herein report the long-term follow-up outcomes, including OS, from this trial. A total of 238 and 246 patients were randomly assigned to the CSC and SC arms, respectively, and were treated (full analysis set). As of the data cutoff (September 2022), the median follow-up duration of the surviving patients was 99.5 months. Compared with SC, CSC significantly increased the OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; stratified log-rank P = .027) with an 8-year OS rate of 63.0% and 55.1% for the CSC and SC arms, respectively. CSC also significantly improved the PFS (HR, 0.70; stratified log-rank P = .016). In conclusion, neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy, as part of perioperative chemotherapy, prolonged the OS of Asian patients with LAGC relative to patients treated with surgery and adjuvant S-1. It should be considered one of the standard treatment options for patients with LAGC in Asia.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Docetaxel , Combinación de Medicamentos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Oxaliplatino , Ácido Oxónico , Neoplasias Gástricas , Tegafur , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Anciano , Adulto , GastrectomíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This multicenter phase I/IIa study aimed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), oxaliplatin, and S-1 (NASOX) as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma without prior systemic treatment for advanced disease, aged ≥ 19 years, with measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible. The primary endpoints were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the phase I cohort and overall response rate (ORR) in the phase IIa cohort. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included patients who received the RP2D. RESULTS: In phase I, seven patients were screened, and six were assessed for DLT. None experienced DLT during the first cycle. The RP2D was determined as nal-IRI 50 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-7 every 14 days. For the ITT (N = 41; 7, and 34 from phases I and IIa, respectively), the most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (31.7 %), enterocolitis (9.8 %), anorexia (7.3 %), and diarrhea (2.4 %). The ORR was 58.5 % (1 complete, and 23 partial responses). Two underwent conversion surgery; both achieved R0 resection. With median follow-up of 17.5 months, median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 5.0-8.1) and median overall survival was 11.4 months (95 % CI, 9.8-15.5). CONCLUSION: NASOX exhibited a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy outcomes consistent with NALIRIFOX, showing potential to replace infusional 5-fluorouracil with oral S-1 in the triplet regimen.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Combinación de Medicamentos , Irinotecán , Oxaliplatino , Ácido Oxónico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Tegafur , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Irinotecán/uso terapéutico , Irinotecán/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/efectos adversos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Oxónico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Ácido Oxónico/efectos adversos , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Tegafur/administración & dosificación , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Tegafur/efectos adversos , Liposomas , Adulto , Supervivencia sin ProgresiónRESUMEN
This study aimed to compare second-line treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) therapy. We conducted an integrated analysis of two retrospective studies included 318 patients receiving nanoliposomal irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (NFF) (n = 102), S-1 (n = 57), or FOLFIRINOX (n = 14) as second-line treatment. Median overall survival (OS) in the NFF group was 9.08 months, significantly better than S-1 (4.90 months, P = 0.002). FOLFIRINOX had a median OS of 4.77 months, not statistically different from NFF. Subgroup analyses of OS indicated NFF was generally superior, however, a statistical interaction was observed between the treatment regimen in serum Alb < 3.5 g/dL (P = 0.042) and serum CRP ≥ 0.3 mg/dL (P = 0.006). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.93 months for NFF, significantly better than S-1 (2.53 months, P = 0.024), while FOLFIRINOX had a comparable PFS (3.04 months, P = 0.948). Multivariate analysis identified the serum CRP, serum CA19-9, duration of first-line GnP therapy, and use (yes/no) of S-1 for second-line treatment as independent predictors for OS. This study concludes that second-line NFF therapy demonstrated a more favorable OS compared to S-1 therapy, however, it is still important to consider the patient background characteristics while selecting the most appropriate treatment.