Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 115, 2024 Aug 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39177674

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lymph node ratio (LNR) is suggested to address the shortcomings of using only lymph node yield (LNY) or status in colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis. This study explores how LNR affects survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), seeking to provide clearer insights into its application. METHODS: This observational cohort study investigated stage IV patients with CRC (1995-2021) who underwent an upfront resection of their primary tumour at Concord Hospital, Sydney. Clinicopathological data were extracted from a prospective database, and LNR was calculated both continuously and dichotomously (LNR of 0 and LNR > 0). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The associations between LNR and various clinicopathological variables were tested using regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses estimated OS in univariate and multivariate survival models. RESULTS: A total of 464 patients who underwent a primary CRC resection with clear margins (mean age 68.1 years [SD 13.4]; 58.0% M; colon cancer [n = 339,73.1%]) had AJCC stage IV disease. The median LNR was 0.18 (IQR 0.05-0.42) for colon cancer (CC) resections and 0.21 (IQR 0.09-0.47) for rectal cancer (RC) resections. A total of 84 patients had an LNR = 0 (CC = 66 patients; RC = 18 patients). The 5-year OS for the CC cohort was 10.5% (95% CI 8.7-12.3) and 11.5% (95% CI 8.4-14.6) for RC. Increasing LNR demonstrated a decline in OS in both CC (P < 0.001) and RC (P < 0.001). In patients with non-lymphatic dissemination only (LNR = 0 or N0 status), there was better survival compared with those with lymphatic spread (CC aHR1.50 [1.08-2.07;P = 0.02], RC aHR 2.21 [1.16-4.24;P = 0.02]). CONCLUSIONS: LNR is worthy of consideration in patients with mCRC. An LNR of 0 indicates patients have a better prognosis, underscoring the need for adequate lymphadenectomy to facilitate precise mCRC staging.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Índice Ganglionar , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Índice Ganglionar/estadística & datos numéricos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Metástasis Linfática , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 125(3S): 101816, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458548

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have shown that the Lymph node ratio (LNR) is useful for predicting the prognosis in some cancers, however there are few reports on the usefulness of LNR in predicting the prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The predictive value of LNR for prognosis of OSCC was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 152 patients with OSCC and histologically confirmed cervical lymph node metastasis who underwent neck dissection. We analyzed the relationship between LNR and overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) retrospectively in these cases, with the relationship between prognosis and clinicopathological findings also examined. RESULTS: Using a receiver operating characteristics curve, the LNR cutoff value was set at 0.095, categorizing 64 and 88 cases into high LNR (≥ 0.095) and low LNR (< 0.095) groups, respectively. Regarding OS and RFS, the prognosis was significantly worse in the high LNR group compared with the low LNR group. In multivariate analysis, sex, postoperative nodal stage, and LNR merged as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: This study's findings suggest that LNR may represent a prognostic indicator in OSCC with cervical lymph node metastasis.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Índice Ganglionar , Metástasis Linfática , Neoplasias de la Boca , Disección del Cuello , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Boca/patología , Neoplasias de la Boca/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Boca/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Boca/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pronóstico , Anciano , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico , Índice Ganglionar/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Tasa de Supervivencia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad
3.
Future Oncol ; 17(25): 3321-3330, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34355983

RESUMEN

Aim: To evaluate the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR) and other clinicopathological factors in patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer. Methods: Factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed in 397 patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy. Patients undergoing the removal of at least ten lymph nodes were included in the study. Results: The 5-year OS and PFS rates were 58% and 52%, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 35.7 months. The LNR cutoff value was 9.6%. In the multivariate analysis, advanced age (≥60 years), grade III tumor, presence of cervical stromal invasion, higher LNR and lack of adjuvant chemotherapy were independent predictors for worse OS and PFS. Conclusion: The LNR is an independent predictor for OS and PFS in patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Índice Ganglionar/estadística & datos numéricos , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Endometriales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Histerectomía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/estadística & datos numéricos , Metástasis Linfática/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Salpingooforectomía
4.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 52(3): 1010-1015, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989652

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer is a major health problem and is one of the most frequent cancers all over the world. In Egypt, the incidence of colon cancer is relatively low, but its mortality rate is high. Lymphatic spread of colon cancer is one of the most important factors affecting the prognosis of patients. Recently, the lymph node ratio (LNR) has been evaluated as a prognostic parameter for survival. This study aimed at evaluation of nodal status of resected specimens and LNR, as well as its impact on the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after curative resection of right colon cancer. METHODS: The institutional registry of the Oncology Center Mansoura University (OCMU) was revised for node-positive right colon cancer cases that were operated in the period between January 2010 and January 2015. Fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria and were followed up till January 2020. RESULTS: A total of 766 lymph nodes were excised from the patients. Thirty-two patients (60.4%) had a LN yield of ≥12 LNs with a mean LNR of 0.257 ± 0.27. Multivariate analysis of outcomes showed that LNR was significantly correlated with both DFS (p = 0.015) and OS (p = 0.024). Moreover, the number of resected LNs was also associated with statistically significant relationship with the DFS and OS. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the validity of LNR as a prognostic tool that correlates with the survival of patients. Moreover, LNR cutoff values may help predict those of high chance of tumor recurrence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: MS/20.03.1087 (Institutional IRB), date of registration: March 10, 2020, "retrospectively registered".


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Índice Ganglionar/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Egipto/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Índice Ganglionar/métodos , Índice Ganglionar/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Centros de Atención Terciaria
5.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 16(6): 1387-1392, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33342802

RESUMEN

AIM: This study assessed whether prognostic information could be obtained in patients with lymph node (LN)-positive breast cancer based on their LN ratios (LNRs) and explored the relationships between other potential prognostic factors and survival. SETTING AND DESIGN: This was a retrospective clinical study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 608 women with node-positive nonmetastatic breast cancer. Clinical and pathologic data were retrospectively evaluated. The median age was 51 years (range: 23-84 years). All patients received adjuvant radiotherapy after radical surgery. A total dose of 50 Gy was administered to the chest wall or breast and LN regions with 2 Gy daily fractions. A 10-Gy boost was administered to the breast tumor bed. The cutoff value of LNR was defined as low risk (<0.21) in 278 patients, intermediate risk (0.21-0.65) in 217 patients, and high risk (>0.65) in 113 patients. Prognostic variables included patient characteristics, disease characteristics, and interventional factors. The primary endpoint was overall survival and the secondary endpoint was breast cancer-related mortality. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Statistical analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis. P value was required to be <0.05. RESULTS: Within a median follow-up period of 95.4 months (range: 5-232.4 months), overall survival rates for 10 and 15 years were 66% and 53%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that LNR (P = 0.026), estrogen receptor status (ERS) (P = 0.021), age (P = 0.04), and smoking (P = 0.024) were independent significant prognostic factors for overall survival. Breast cancer-related mortality rates at 10 and 15 years were 70.7% and 60%, respectively. LNR (P = 0.03) and ERS (P = 0.002) were independent significant prognostic factors for breast cancer-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: LNR and ERS were significant prognostic factors for survival at all endpoints.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Índice Ganglionar/estadística & datos numéricos , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Mama/patología , Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/estadística & datos numéricos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Metástasis Linfática/terapia , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
6.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 762, 2020 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32795292

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third and second leading cancer in men and women respectively with 600,000 deaths per year. Traditionally, clinicians have relied solely on nodal disease involvement, and measurements such as lymph node ratio (LNR; the ratio of metastatic/positive lymph nodes to total number of lymph nodes examined), when determining patient prognosis in CRC. The log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) is a logistic transformation formula that uses pathologic lymph node data to stratify survival differences among patients within a single stage of disease. This formula allows clinicians to identify whether patients with clinically aggressive tumours fall into higher-risk groups regardless of nodal positivity and can potentially guide adjuvant treatment modalities. The aim of this study was to investigate whether LODDS in colon cancer provides better prognostication compared to LNR. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients on the prospectively maintained Cabrini Monash University Department of Surgery colorectal neoplasia database, incorporating data from hospitals in Melbourne Australia, identified patients entered between January 2010 and March 2016. Association of LODDS and LNR with clinical variables were analysed. Disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival were investigated with Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS: There were 862 treatment episodes identified in the database (402 male, 47%). The median patient age was 73 (range 22-100 years). There were 799 colonic cancers and 63 rectosigmoid cancers. The lymph node yield (LNY) was suboptimal (< 12) in 168 patients (19.5%) (p = 0.05). The 5-year OS for the different LNR groups were 86, 91 and 61% (p < 0.001) for LNR0 (655 episodes), LNR1 (128 episodes) and LNR2 (78 episodes), respectively. For LODDS, they were 85, 91 and 61% (p < 0.001) in LODDS0 (569 episodes), LODDS1 (217 episodes) and LODDS2 (75 episodes) groups (p < 0.001). Overall survival rates were comparable between the LNR and LODDS group and for LNY < 12 and stage III patients when each were sub-grouped by LODDS and LNR. CONCLUSION: This study has shown for that the prognostic impact of LODDS is comparable to LNR for colon cancer patients. Accordingly, LNR is recommended for prognostication given its ease of calculation.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Índice Ganglionar/estadística & datos numéricos , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Australia/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Colon/patología , Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oportunidad Relativa , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
7.
J Gynecol Oncol ; 31(1): e1, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31788991

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) in women with 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC cervical cancer. METHODS: In this retrospective dual-institutional study, a total of 185 node-positive cervical cancer patients who had undergone radical hysterectomy with systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy were included. All of the patients received adjuvant chemoradiation after surgery. LNR was defined as the ratio of positive lymph nodes (LNs) to the total number of LNs removed. The patients were categorized into 2 groups according to LNR; LNR <0.05 and LNR ≥0.05. The prognostic value of LNR was evaluated with univariate log-rank tests and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients (74.6%) had stage IIIC1 disease and 47 (25.4%) patients had stage IIIC2 disease. With a median follow-up period of 45.5 months (range 3-135 months), the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 62.5% whereas the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 70.4% for the entire study population. The 5-year DFS rates for LNR <0.05 and LNR ≥0.05 were 78.2%, and 48.4%, respectively (p<0.001). Additionally, the 5-year OS rates for LNR <0.05 and LNR ≥0.05 were 80.6%, and 61.2%, respectively (p=0.007). On multivariate analysis, LNR ≥0.05 was associated with a worse DFS (hazard ratio [HR]=2.12; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.15-3.90; p=0.015) and OS (HR=1.95; 95% CI=1.01-3.77; p=0.046) in women with stage IIIC cervical cancer. CONCLUSIONS: LNR ≥0.05 seems to be an independent prognostic factor for decreased DFS and OS in stage IIIC cervical carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Índice Ganglionar/estadística & datos numéricos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/análisis , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugía
8.
J Pediatr Surg ; 55(3): 369-375, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31706606

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) is defined as the number of positive lymph nodes (pLN) divided by total lymph nodes (LN) examined. LNR correlates with recurrence and/or overall survival in many adult cancers but has not previously been described in pediatric oncologic disease. We hypothesized that LNR correlates with worse disease specific survival (DSS) in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS: Patients <20 years who underwent surgery for RMS between 1988 and 2013 in the SEER database were analyzed. RESULTS: 188 patients with a mean age at diagnosis of 8.8 ±â€¯6 years and a mean LNR of 0.13 ±â€¯0.27 were identified. Univariate analysis found that alveolar type, positive lymph node (pLN), stage, site, LNR, and age had significantly worse survival. Cox regression analysis identified LNR > 0.75 (HR 4.32, P = 0.015), alveolar histology (HR 4.797, P < 0.003), age < 1 year (HR 4.402, P = 0.004), and distant disease (HR 5.738, P < 0.001), as independent determinants of worse DSS. pLN and site were not statistically significant determinant of DSS on multivariate analysis. DSS for the entire cohort was 83% at 5 and 78% at 10 and 15 years. DSS at 5, 10, and 15 year for LNR ≤ 0.75 was 79% while patients with LNR > 0.75 had a 22% 5 year and 0% 10 year survival (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LNR is superior to pLN status as an independent prognostic indicator of DSS in pediatric RMS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.


Asunto(s)
Índice Ganglionar/estadística & datos numéricos , Rabdomiosarcoma , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rabdomiosarcoma/mortalidad , Rabdomiosarcoma/patología , Adulto Joven
9.
J Surg Res ; 236: 2-11, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30694756

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic impact of the lymph node ratio (LNR) versus positive lymph node count (PLNC) in patients who had undergone resection for distal cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: We identified 448 patients with resected distal cholangiocarcinoma from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The X-Tile program was used to calculate the cutoff values for the LNR and PLNC that discriminate survival. The overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates were calculated. Relationships between clinicopathological factors and patient survival were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff values for the LNR and PLNC were 0.45 and 3, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that tumor size, the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, T stage, the LNR and PLNC were significantly associated with prognosis (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the LNR, T stage, and tumor size were independent prognostic factors for cancer-specific and overall survival, whereas PLNC was not. In the subgroup of patients with positive lymph nodes, patients with an LNR of greater than 0.45 had significantly worse cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 2.418; 95% confidence interval, 1.588 to 3.682; P < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.149; 95% CI, 1.421 to 3.249; P < 0.001) than those with an LNR of 0.45 or less. CONCLUSIONS: The LNR was a better predictor of long-term prognosis than PLNC in patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidad , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice Ganglionar/estadística & datos numéricos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/terapia , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Colangiocarcinoma/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...