Reducing Tracheostomy-Related Acquired Pressure Injury by Flipping the Ventilator Circuit Position Study.

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy-related acquired pressure injuries (TRPIs) are one of the hospital-acquired conditions. We hypothesize that an uneven ventilator circuit load, leading to non-neutral tracheostomy tube positioning in the immediate post-tracheostomy period, leads to an increased incidence of TRPIs. Does switching the ventilator circuit load daily, in addition to standard post-tracheostomy care, lead to a decreased incidence of TRPIs? METHODS: This is a prospective quality improvement study. Study was conducted at two academic hospital sites within tertiary care hospitals at Emory University in different ICUs. Consecutive patients undergoing bedside percutaneous tracheostomy by the interventional pulmonary service were included. The flip the ventilator circuit (FLIC) protocol was designed and implemented in selected ICUs, with other ICUs as controls. RESULTS: Incidence of TRPI in intervention and control group were recorded at post-tracheostomy day 5. A total of 99 patients were included from October 22, 2019, to May 22, 2020. Overall, the total incidence of any TRPI was 23% at post-tracheostomy day 5. Incidence of stage I, stage II, and stages III-IV TRPIs at postoperative day 5 was 11%, 12%, and 0%, respectively. There was a decrease in the rate of skin breakdown in patients following the FLIC protocol when compared with standard of care (13% vs. 36%; p = 0.01). In a multivariable analysis, interventional group had decreased odds of developing TRPI (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.92; p = 0.03) after adjusting for age, albumin, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, and days in hospital before tracheostomy. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of TRPIs within the first week following percutaneous tracheostomy is high. Switching the side of the ventilator circuit to evenly distribute load, in addition to standard bundled tracheostomy care, may decrease the overall incidence of TRPIs.

Pressure ulcer development in patients treated for acute ischaemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of pressure ulcers (PUs) in patients treated for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) and to evaluate comorbid/confounding factors. METHOD: The study included patients treated for AIS who were divided into three treatment groups: those receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy (tPA); patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT); and those receiving both tPA and MT. PUs were classified according to the international classification system and factors that may influence their development were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 242 patients were included in this study. The incidence of PUs in patients treated for AIS was 7.4%. Most PUs were located on the sacrum (3.7%), followed by the gluteus (3.3%) and trochanter (2.9%). With regards to PU classification: 29% were stage I; 34% were stage II; and the remainder were stage III. Age was not a significant factor in the development of PUs (p=0.172). Patients in the tPA group had a lower PU incidence (2.3%) than patients in the tPA+MT group (15.7%) and MT group (12.1%) (p=0.001). Patients with PUs had a longer period of hospitalisation (18.5±11.92 days) than patients without a PU (8.0±8.52 days) (p=0.000). National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission were higher in patients with PUs than in patients without a PU (14.33±4.38 versus 11.08±5.68, respectively; p=0.010). The difference in presence of comorbidities between patients with and without PUs (p=0.922) and between treatment groups (p=0.677) were not statistically significant. The incidence of PUs was higher in patients requiring intensive care, but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.089). CONCLUSION: In this study, patients treated for AIS with high NIHSS scores at admission and/or receiving MT were at higher risk for PUs, and so particular attention should be given to these patients in order to prevent PU development.

Pressure ulcers related to prone positioning: a pandemic amidst a pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the epidemiology and risk factors associated with the development of pressure ulcers (PUs) in patients receiving prone positioning (PP) ventilatory therapy; to compare the inflammatory status of patients who develop PUs with those who do not; and to describe the experience and useful findings that have allowed us to improve the management of these patients to reduce the incidence of PUs. METHOD: An observational, descriptive and longitudinal study was conducted, where sociodemographic and laboratory data were collected from patients who were hospitalised and required PP ventilatory therapy in critical care areas (CCA) during the months of May-October 2020. RESULTS: From the total number of patients who required PP during their CCA stay (n=240), 202 (84.2%) developed a PU. The four most frequent areas where a PU appeared were: the head and neck (n=115); the pinna (n=21); the torso (n=21); and the lower limbs (n=21). Patients who developed PU were more frequently males with higher initial levels of creatinine phosphokinase and ferritin. The incidence for each month of follow-up decreased from 8.3% to 5.8%. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the intervention, a multidisciplinary approach is required to optimise the prevention and treatment of these wounds. While PUs are often the result of other medical conditions or poor health status in general, the vast majority of PUs are avoidable.

Changes in Interprofessional Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Effect on Patient Outcomes: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Changes in healthcare delivery were required during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of the approach to care of the COVID-19 patient on nursing sensitive indicators and nutrition therapy and the utilization of rehabilitation services during the first year of the pandemic in the acute care setting. METHOD: A retrospective study of 894 patients admitted with a COVID-19 diagnosis was conducted between March 2020 and February 2021 in 3-month cohorts. All charts were reviewed for general demographics and hospital data, nursing quality indicators, and nutritional and rehabilitation services for the first 30 days of admission. RESULTS: Differences in patient characteristics were noted among the cohorts. Variations were observed between time points in hospital-acquired pressure injury occurrence, with mechanical ventilation and proning being independent predictors of hospital-acquired pressure injuries. There were differences noted in the percentage of patients with a central line-associated bloodstream infection among the time points (P < .001), but there were no differences noted in catheter-associated urinary tract infections (P = .20). Overall, 15.5% had a malnutrition diagnosis, with most patients receiving 50% of prescribed calorie and protein needs. Rehabilitation services increased over time with these services being initiated earlier in the later cohorts (P < .001). DISCUSSION: The results of this study demonstrated the impact of the pandemic on outcomes in the areas of nursing, nutrition, and rehabilitation, which varied across quarterly cohorts as we learned and developed new practices and adapted to a novel pandemic.

Pressure ulcers: aSSKINg framework study.

Pressure ulcers (PUs) represent a burden to the health economy and patients alike. Despite national and international guidelines regarding the management of risk, the incidence and prevalence across England remains high. Detecting early the risk of PUs is paramount, and requires using a valid risk assessment tool alongside clinical judgement and management of associated risk factors. There is a need to implement prevention strategies. Introducing care bundles for pressure ulcers, for example SKIN, SSKIN and most recently aSSKINg, is designed to guide clinicians and reduce variations in care. This article presents a review of the evidence on compliance with guidelines, frameworks, pathways or care bundles within primary and secondary care settings. This article focuses on the literature review that was conducted to inform a subsequent clinical audit of compliance with the aSSKINg framework in a Community NHS Foundation Trust in the South East of England.

Urinary Catheter-Related Meatal Pressure Injury Risk Factors in Male Critical Care Patients: A Prospective Repeated-Measures Study.

OBJECTIVE: Urinary catheter-related meatal pressure injury (UCR-MPI) is a preventable and serious complication of indwelling urinary catheter use. This prospective study aimed to determine the prevalence and risk factors of UCR-MPI in male critical care patients. METHODS: A total of 138 male patients 18 years and older using an indwelling urinary catheter were included in the study. Participants' perineal areas were assessed daily for the development of MPI. RESULTS: The UCR-MPI prevalence was 26.1% (n = 36/138). Most patients (61.1%) had a grade I UCR-MPI with intact skin and mucosa and nonblanchable erythema. Urinary catheter irrigation (P = .001), lower Braden Scale scores (P = .040), lower Glasgow Coma Scale score (P = .002), higher Itaki Fall Risk Scale score (P = .040), higher dependency level (P = .027), hypoalbuminemia (P = .002), and perineal edema (P = .001) were risk factors for UCR-MPI. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of UCR-MPI was high in this sample. Providers should take preventive measures to prevent UCR-MPI in patients with a penis including early and frequent risk assessment.

Comparing demographics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 lesions versus hospital-acquired pressure ulcers/injuries during the first year of COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: As COVID-19 has emerged as a pandemic virus, multiple reports have surfaced to describe skin lesions that occur either associated with the virus or due to treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare patient demographics, treatments, and outcomes in COVID-19 symptomatic patients who developed skin lesions (COVID-19 or hospital-acquired pressure ulcer/injury [HAPU/I]) during the first year of the pandemic. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on COVID-positive symptomatic patients admitted from March 1, 2020, through March 1, 2021. The authors analyzed the difference in patient demographics, patient skin tones, treatments, hospital length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, death, and discharge disposition for those with COVID-19 lesions compared to those who developed HAPU/Is. RESULTS: Of those who developed lesions, 2.3% developed COVID-19 lesions and 7.2% developed HAPU/Is. Patients with COVID-19 lesions were more likely to be male (64%), younger (median age 60), and had a higher BMI (30) than patients with no wounds and patients with HAPU/I. CONCLUSION: This study advances the knowledge of the patient demographics and treatments that may contribute to identifying the new phenomenon of COVID lesions and how they differ from HAPU/Is.

Pressure injury risk factors in patients undergoing general anesthesia surgeries.

BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries result from prolonged pressure and lead to tissue damage, infections, extended recovery times, and an economic burden. PURPOSE: To explore risk factors for pressure injuries in patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery at a regional educational hospital in southern Taiwan from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. RESULTS: A comprehensive multivariate analysis was used to identify the prominent risk factors for pressure injury among the 11 231 patients enrolled in this study. These risk factors were an age of ≥65 years; surgery duration of >120 minutes; diastolic blood pressure of <60 mm Hg for >30 minutes during surgery; intraoperative use of dopamine, norepinephrine, or epinephrine as vasopressors; American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification of III or higher; minimum intraoperative body temperature of ≤35°C; blood loss of >500 mL; and a supine or prone surgical position. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified several pressure injury risk factors related to surgical conditions and patient characteristics. Surgical teams must monitor, control, and manage these factors, prioritize staff education, and adopt preventive protocols.

Evaluating the efficacy of standardized pressure ulcer management protocols in the prevention of pressure injuries among patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures.

Pressure injuries are a significant concern for patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures due to prolonged immobility and the complexity of care. This study evaluates the efficacy of standardized pressure ulcer management protocols in preventing pressure injuries and enhancing patient care in a neurosurgical context. A comprehensive retrospective analysis was conducted at a single institution from December 2020 to December 2023, comparing 50 patients who received standardized pressure ulcer management (intervention group) with 50 patients who received conventional care (control group). The study assessed the incidence of pressure ulcers, patient comfort levels using the Kolcaba Comfort Scale and sleep quality using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 27.0, applying t-tests and chi-square tests as appropriate. The intervention group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of pressure ulcers at all measured time points post-surgery compared to the control group. Patient comfort levels in the intervention group were consistently higher across psychological, environmental, physiological and socio-cultural domains. Sleep quality metrics, including sleep depth, latency to sleep onset and overall sleep quality, were significantly improved in the intervention group. The implementation of standardized pressure ulcer management protocols in neurosurgical care significantly reduces the incidence of pressure injuries, enhances patient comfort and improves sleep quality. These findings highlight the importance of adopting structured care protocols to improve postoperative outcomes and patient well-being in neurosurgical settings.

A realist evaluation of devices used for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers: An ethnographic study of clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: It is known that heel offloading devices are widely used in clinical practice for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers, even though there is a lack of robust, good quality evidence to inform their use. OBJECTIVE: To explore how and why heel offloading devices are used (or not used) and reasoning behind their use in population at high risk of developing heel pressure ulcers. METHODS: An ethnographic study was conducted as part of a realist evaluation in three orthopaedic wards in a large English hospital. Twelve observations took place, with 49 h and 35 min of patient care observed. A total of 32 patients were observed and 19 members of the nursing team were interviewed and in-depth interviews with the three ward managers were conducted. RESULTS: Although the focus of the study was on offloading devices, constant low pressure heel specific devices were also observed in use for pressure ulcer prevention, whilst offloading devices were perceived to be for higher risk patients or those already with a heel pressure ulcer. Nursing staff viewed leadership from the ward manager and the influence of the Tissue Viability Nurse Specialists as key mechanisms for the proactive use of devices. CONCLUSIONS: This study informs trial design as it has identified that a controlled clinical trial of both types of heel specific devices is required to inform evidence-based practice. Involving the ward managers and Tissue Viability Nurse Specialists during set up phase for clinical equipoise could improve recruitment. Tweetable abstract How, for whom, and in what circumstances do devices work to prevent heel pressure ulcers? Observations of clinical practice.

Can a prolonged healing pressure injury be benefited by using an AI mattress? A case study.

BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries are a common and serious issue for bedridden residents in long-term-care facilities. Areas of bony prominences, such as the scapula, sacrum, and heels, are more likely to develop pressure injuries. The management of pressure injury wounds include dressing changes, repositioning, away from moisture, decreasing the occurrence of friction and shear, and more. Some supportive surfaces are also used for pressure injury cases such as gel pads, alternating pressure air mattresses, and air-fluidized beds. The aim of this case study was to determine whether the use of an artificial intelligent mattress can improve a nursing home resident with prolonged pressure injury. CASE PRESENTATION: A retrospective study design was conducted for this case study. A 79-year-old male developed a pressure injury in the sacrum. His pressure injury was initially at stage 4, with a score of 12 by the Braden scale. The PUSH score was 16. During 5.5 months of routine care plus the use of the traditional alternative air mattress, in the nursing home, the wound stayed in stage 3 but the PUSH score increased up to 11. An artificial intelligence mattress utilizing 3D InterSoft was used to detect the bony prominences and redistribute the external pressure of the skin. It implements a color guided schematic of 26 colors to indicate the amount of pressure of the skin. RESULTS: The wound size was decreased and all eczema on the resident's back diminished. The PUSH score was down to 6, as the artificial intelligent mattress was added into the routine care. The staff also reported that the resident's quality of sleep improved and moaning decreased. The hemiplegic side is at greater risk of developing pressure injury. CONCLUSIONS: This novice device appeared to accelerate wound healing in this case. In the future, more cases should be tested, and different care models or mattress can be explored.

Hospital-acquired pressure injury: our seven years of experience.

OBJECTIVE: A pressure injury (PI) happens on the skin and in deeper tissues. Generally, it occurs due to prolonged compression over bony structures. A PI, when occurring during a hospital stay, is regarded as a hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI), and is considered as a marker for patient care quality. It might cause medical, legal or economic problems, and could be a burden on health systems. In this study we evaluate the factors contributing to HAPI formation. METHOD: Between June 2014-June 2021, we retrospectively investigated the files of patients who were hospitalised with different medical conditions in Bayindir Sögütözü Hospital, Ankara, Turkey, for patients' age, sex, Waterlow scale score, mobilisation status, application of zinc-containing and/or barrier creams (ZnBC), airbed usage, hospitalisation period, and the day of wound opening. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 2327 hospitalised patients: 303 (13%) developed Stage 2 and deeper PIs; 2024 patients were hospitalised and discharged without wound opening. We found an increased risk in male patients and a lack of efficacy of ZnBC in protection from HAPI in our study population. However, we observed that ZnBC helped to delay wound opening and that the most protective treatment was the use of airbeds. CONCLUSION: Health professionals should be more aware of HAPI formation with prolonged hospitalisation periods. Only the use of an airbed for a patient hospitalised for a long period appears to be protective against PI formation. On the other hand, use of ZnBC delays wound opening. However, further research is needed to demonstrate the protective effect of ZnBC, due to the lack of randomisation in our study and the lack of some nursing records.

Risk Factors of Intraoperative Pressure Injury in Adult Patients Undergoing Neurologic Surgery.

GENERAL PURPOSE: To present research investigating the incidence of and risk factors associated with intraoperative pressure injury in patients undergoing neurologic surgery at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University in China. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Identify the incidence of intraoperative pressure injuries (PIs) in patients undergoing neurologic surgery at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University in China.2. Describe risk factors for intraoperative PI.3. Outline strategies to help mitigate intraoperative PI risk.

Intraoperative pressure injury (PI) development is an adverse event that impacts thousands of patients globally and is associated with extended hospital stays and increased risk of mortality. To investigate the incidence of intraoperative PI in patients undergoing neurologic surgery and identify associated risk factors. A total of 1,728 patients who underwent neurosurgery in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University between January 2021 and December 2022 were included in this retrospective study. The authors collected patients' demographic data and clinical characteristics and used univariate and multivariate regression to evaluate significant PI risk factors. Intraoperative PI was observed in 1.8% of all surgical cases (n = 31). Having a body mass index greater than 24 kg/m2 (odds ratio, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.62­9.23; P = .002), being in a lateral position (odds ratio, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.04­6.17; P = .042) or a prone position (odds ratio, 10.43; 95% CI, 3.37­32.23; P < .001), and having a longer operation time (cutoff point at 7.92 hours for increased risk of PI; odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.21­1.53; P < .001) were significant risk factors for intraoperative PI. This study identified three independent risk factors for intraoperative PI development: body position, surgery duration, and high body mass index. These findings can help OR nurses identify patients who are vulnerable to intraoperative PI and provide appropriate preventive measures. For these patients, perioperative protection and frequent microrepositioning during surgery would be indispensable.

[Incidence of pressure injuries associated with oxygen therapy devices in the neonatal intensive care unit]. / Incidencia de lesiones por presión asociadas a dispositivos de oxigenoterapia en la unidad de cuidados intensivos neonatales.

OBJECTIVE: The administration of oxygen therapy (O2) in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) increases the risk of developing pressure injuries (PBI). The aims of the study were to describe the incidence of PBI associated with O2 devices in the NICU, to identify, analyze and relate risk factors and the application of their preventive measures. METHODS: A retrospective, observational and analytical study of hospitalized neonates who developed PPL secondary to O2 devices in the NICU of the Miguel Servet University Hospital of Zaragoza was carried out. Socio-demographical, clinical, type of cot, humidity, temperature, type of oxygen therapy, ventilation mode, device and presence of ulcer (number, degree, location), and preventive measures were recorded. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Autonomous Community of Aragon. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi 2.3.13®. RESULTS: A total of 191 neonates were included, of whom 158 (82.7%) received O2. Of those who received oxygen therapy, 64.10% (25) were infants, mean total age 5.20±8.46 days and mean weight 1,460.03±777.57 grams. 24.68% presented with device-associated PPL, with a mean number of days of admission at the time of onset of 3.98±5.03 days. 94.74% (36) of the lesions were grade I and 84.62% (33) were located in the nasal septum. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of pressure injuries associated with different oxygen therapy devices increases with decreasing gestational age. The risk increases with hospital stay, with the presence of medical devices, in particular non-invasive mechanical ventilation, being the main causal relationship.

OBJETIVO: La administración de oxigenoterapia en las unidades de cuidados intensivos neonatales (UCIN) supone un aumento del riesgo de desarrollar lesiones por presión (LPP). Los objetivos de este trabajo fueron describir la incidencia de LPP asociadas a dispositivos de oxigenoterapia, así como identificar, analizar y relacionar los factores de riesgo y sus medidas preventivas. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, observacional y analítico de neonatos hospitalizados que desarrollaran una LPP secundaria a dispositivos de O2 en la UCIN del Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet de Zaragoza. Las variables registradas fueron las sociodemográficas, las clínicas, el tipo de cuna, la humedad, la temperatura, el tipo de oxigenoterapia, el tipo de ventilación, el dispositivo utilizado, la presencia de úlcera (número, grado, localización) y las medidas preventivas aplicadas. El estudio fue aprobado por el Comité de Ética de la Investigación de la Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón. El análisis estadístico se realizó mediante Jamovi 2.3.13®. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 191 neonatos, de los cuales 158 (82,7%) recibieron oxigenoterapia. El 64,10% de ellos fueron niños, la media de edad fue de 5,20±8,46 días y la de peso de 1.460,0±777,57 gramos. El 24,68% presentaron LPP asociada a dispositivo, con una media de días de ingreso en el momento de la aparición de 3,98±5,03 días. El 94,74% de las lesiones fueron de grado I y el 84,62% se localizaron en tabique nasal. CONCLUSIONES: La incidencia de LPP asociada a los diferentes dispositivos de oxigenoterapia aumenta a medida que disminuye la edad gestacional. El riesgo aumenta con la estancia hospitalaria, siendo la presencia de dispositivos médicos, en particular la ventilación mecánica no invasiva, la principal causa.

Predicting pressure injury risk in hospitalised patients using machine learning with electronic health records: a US multilevel cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To predict the risk of hospital-acquired pressure injury using machine learning compared with standard care. DESIGN: We obtained electronic health records (EHRs) to structure a multilevel cohort of hospitalised patients at risk for pressure injury and then calibrate a machine learning model to predict future pressure injury risk. Optimisation methods combined with multilevel logistic regression were used to develop a predictive algorithm of patient-specific shifts in risk over time. Machine learning methods were tested, including random forests, to identify predictive features for the algorithm. We reported the results of the regression approach as well as the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve for predictive models. SETTING: Hospitalised inpatients. PARTICIPANTS: EHRs of 35 001 hospitalisations over 5 years across 2 academic hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Longitudinal shifts in pressure injury risk. RESULTS: The predictive algorithm with features generated by machine learning achieved significantly improved prediction of pressure injury risk (p<0.001) with an area under the ROC curve of 0.72; whereas standard care only achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.52. At a specificity of 0.50, the predictive algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 0.75. CONCLUSIONS: These data could help hospitals conserve resources within a critical period of patient vulnerability of hospital-acquired pressure injury which is not reimbursed by US Medicare; thus, conserving between 30 000 and 90 000 labour-hours per year in an average 500-bed hospital. Hospitals can use this predictive algorithm to initiate a quality improvement programme for pressure injury prevention and further customise the algorithm to patient-specific variation by facility.

Comparison of the Predictive Validity of Norton and Braden Scales in Determining the Risk of Pressure Injury in Elderly Patients.

AIM: To compare the reliability and predictive validity of Norton and Braden scales in determining the risk of pressure injury in elderly patients. DESIGN: This research used a comparative design. One hundred thirty elderly patients participated in the study. METHODS: The daily pressure injury risk of participants was evaluated by a researcher using both the Norton and Braden scales in a consecutive manner. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 75.1 ± 8.5 years, and that for those without and with pressure injury development was 75.0 ± 8.3 years and 76.1 ± 9.7 years (P < .001), respectively. The reliability coefficients of the Norton and Braden scales were .82 and .89, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Norton Scale were 100%, 40.7%, 20.2%, and 100%, and those of the Braden Scale were 100%, 32.7%, 18.3%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The reliability of both scales for elderly patients was found to be high, and their ability to differentiate patients at risk was comparable. However, both scales had low specificity. Further research is needed to develop scales that have higher predictive validity for the elderly population, taking into account other risk factors that influence total scale scores.

Comparative analysis of pressure ulcer development in stroke patients within and outside healthcare facilities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The risk of pressure ulcers in stroke patients is a significant concern, impacting their recovery and quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigate the prevalence and risk factors of pressure ulcers in stroke patients, comparing those in healthcare facilities with those in home-based or non-clinical environments. The study aims to elucidate how different care settings affect the development of pressure ulcers, serving as a crucial indicator of patient care quality and management across diverse healthcare contexts. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies on stroke patients in various settings, reporting on the incidence or prevalence of pressure ulcers. Exclusion criteria included non-stroke patients, non-original research and studies with incomplete data. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for quality assessment, and statistical analyses involved both fixed-effect and random-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity observed. A total of 1542 articles were initially identified, with 11 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The studies exhibited significant heterogeneity, necessitating the use of a random-effects model. The pooled prevalence of pressure injuries was 9.53% in patients without family medical services and 2.64% in patients with medical services. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of these results, and no significant publication bias was detected through funnel plot analysis and Egger's linear regression test. The meta-analysis underscores the heightened risk of pressure injuries in stroke patients, especially post-discharge. It calls for concerted efforts among healthcare providers, policymakers and caregivers to implement targeted strategies tailored to the specific needs of different care environments. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating interventions to effectively integrate into routine care and reduce the incidence of pressure injuries in stroke patients.

Hematologic and Serum Biochemical Values Associated With Different Stages of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Patients: A Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether hematologic and serum biochemical values used as indicators of nutritional status, anemia, and/or infection were associated with the risk of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (PIs) and stage of PIs in patients. DESIGN: A retrospective review of medical records. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Data were collected from medical records including official PI records and PI incident reports of inpatients at a teaching hospital in Taiwan between January 2019 and October 2020. METHODS: We collected demographic variables of the inpatients and their hematologic and serum biochemical values within 1 day of PI occurrence (including the day of PI occurrence), 6 to 7 days before PI occurrence, and 13 to 14 days before PI occurrence. RESULTS: Among the 309 inpatients with official PI records, 105 (34.0%) had Stage 1 PIs, 131 (42.4%) had Stage 2 or 3 PIs, and 73 (23.6%) had unstageable or suspected deep tissue injuries. After controlling for the type of department where PIs occurred and length of hospital stay up to the day of PI occurrence, we found significant differences in levels of hemoglobin (odds ratio [OR] = 0.47, P = .009) within 1 day of PI occurrence and in albumin (OR = 0.30, P = .001) 13 to 14 days before PI occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings suggest that lower hemoglobin levels on the day of PI occurrence and lower albumin levels 2 weeks before PI occurrence resulted in a significantly higher risk of developing unstageable or suspected deep tissue injuries than of developing Stage 1 PIs.

Association between hypertension and pressure ulcer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This review aims to systematically evaluate the association between hypertension and pressure ulcer (PU). PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies from their inception until September 12, 2023. Literature search, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted independently by two researchers. The random-effects model was used to calculate the combined odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) of hypertension in patients with PU; subgroup analyses were performed to explore the source of between-study heterogeneity; sensitivity analysis was used to test the robust of the combined result; and funnel plot and Egger's test were used to assess the publication bias. Finally, a total of 19 studies with 564 716 subjects were included; the overall pooled result showed no significant association between hypertension and risk of developing PU (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.90-1.47, p = 0.27); and the sensitivity analysis and publication bias analysis showed robust of the combined result. Subgroup analysis indicated a significant association between hypertension and PU when the primary disease was COVID-19 (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.35-2.22, p < 0.0001). No association between hypertension and PU was seen in subgroup analysis on the patient source and study design. In sum, there is no significantly statistical association between hypertension and the occurrence of PU in most cases, while the risk of PU significantly elevates among COVID-19 patients combined with hypertension regardless of patient source and study design.