Global research progress on radiofrequency ablation in cardiology: A bibliometric analysis (2004-2023).

In recent years, significant advancements in radiofrequency ablation technology have notably enhanced arrhythmia treatment in cardiology. Technological advancements and increasing clinical adoption have made radiofrequency ablation a key therapy in improving life quality for patients with conditions like atrial fibrillation (AF). Consequently, there has been a marked increase in research output, underscoring the technology's significance and its potential in cardiology. Aims to comprehensively analyze cardiology's radiofrequency ablation research trends, identifying leading countries and institutions in international collaborations, key researchers' contributions, and evolving research hotspots. The study, based on the Web of Science Core Collection database, reviewed the literatures from 2004 to 2023. CiteSpace 6.2.R7 Basic was used for bibliometric analysis, which examined annual publication trends, international collaboration networks, key authors, leading research institutions, major journals, keyword co-occurrence and clustering trends. Analyzing 3423 relevant articles, this study reveals a consistent growth in cardiology radiofrequency ablation research since 2004. The analysis shows that the United States, Germany, and France hold central roles in the international collaboration network, with leading authors from premier US and European institutions. Keyword cluster analysis identifies "atrial flutter" and "ventricular tachycardia" as current research focal points. Cardiology radiofrequency ablation research shows a growth trend, led by the United States and European countries. Research hotspots are concentrated on the diverse applications of radiofrequency ablation technology and the treatment of AF. Future studies may increasingly focus on technological innovation and the deepening of clinical applications.

Recurrences after Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Incidence, Mechanisms, Predictors, and Comparison with Thermal Energy.

Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) is the latest and most intriguing technology for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, due to its capability to generate irreversible and cardiomyocytes-selective electroporation of cell membranes by delivering microsecond-lasting high-voltage electrical fields, leading to high expectations. The first trials to assess the clinical success of PFA, reported an arrhythmia-free survival at 1-year of 78.5%, while other trials showed less enthusiastic results: 66.2% in paroxysmal and 55.1% in persistent AF. Nevertheless, real world data are encouraging. The isolation of pulmonary veins with PFA is easily achieved with 100% acute success. Systematic invasive remapping showed a high prevalence of durable pulmonary vein isolation at 75 and 90 days (range 84-96%), which were significatively lower in redo procedures (64.3%). The advent of PFA is prompting a reconsideration of the role of the autonomic nervous system in AF ablation, as PFA-related sparing of the ganglionated plexi could lead to the still undetermined effect on late arrhythmias' recurrences. Moreover, a new concept of a blanking period could be formulated with PFA, according to its different mechanism of myocardial injury, with less inflammation and less chronic fibrosis. Finally, in this review, we also compare PFA with thermal energy.

The comparison of catheter ablation on hard outcomes versus medical treatment for atrial fibrillation patients: A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.

BACKGROUND: The prevailing view is that ablation does not reduce the incidence of stroke and deaths in atrial fibrillation (AF), and guidelines suggest that long-term anticoagulation is required after ablation, regardless of the success of the procedure. We performed a meta-analysis of recent randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) to verify whether ablation compared with drugs reduced the incidence of stroke and deaths. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for RCTs of AF catheter ablation (CA) compared to medical therapy (MT). The risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model. A trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to further validate the reliability of the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Seventeen RCTs were included, comprising 5,258 patients (CA, n = 2760; MT, n = 2498). Compared with medical therapy, CA was associated with a reduction in stroke/transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) (p = 0.035; RR = 0.61 [95% CI, 0.386 to 0.965]; I2 = 0.0%) and deaths (p = 0.004; RR = 0.7 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.89]; I2 = 0.0%). CA was associated with improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p = 0.000; WMD = 5.39 [95% CI, 2.45 to 8.32]; I2 = 84.4%) and the rate of maintenance of sinus rhythm (SR) (p = 0.000; RR = 3.55 [95% CI, 2.34 to 5.40]; I2 = 76.7%). CONCLUSIONS: CA for AF had more favourable outcomes in terms of stroke/TIAs, deaths, change in LVEF, and the maintenance of SR at the end of follow-up compared to MT. Besides, the TSA results supported this conclusion.

Gender-specific association of risk factors in patients who underwent catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been highlighted as a growing epidemic. Evidence is lacking on the role of different risk factors within both genders especially in AF patients referred for catheter ablation (CA). The objective was the evaluation of differences between men and women in the associations with aging, obesity and hypertension as the most highly contributing factors to AF onset and progression. METHODS: Cases selected among patients scheduled for CA as a rhythm-control strategy and controls from a recent Italian national survey on the population's health conditions were analysed to quantify the strength of association and to assess the existence of gender differences. To reduce the effect of possible confounding factors, both cases and controls were selected without preexisting comorbidities other than hypertension. RESULTS: At multivariate logistic regression analysis, cases (534 patients, 166 women) were significantly associated with the male sex, higher age, presence of obesity and hypertension in comparison to controls (17,983 subjects, 9,409 women). At analyses gender-stratified, age and obesity had a significant greater association in women than men. On the contrary, hypertension was relatively more frequent in men than women. CONCLUSION: Although mechanisms linking risk factors and AF are complex, this study suggests the existence of differences mediated by gender in AF drug-refractory patients who underwent CA. A tailored public health programme to reduce the growing burden of AF needs to be designed to prevent and counter the increasing epidemic of the most common cardiac arrhythmia as well as its progression in more resistant forms.

Current Status of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Japan.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has been an established and frequently utilized approach in a variety of clinical settings. Nevertheless, real-world data about the clinical course of AF patients after initial catheter ablation remain limited, and these are mainly derived from particular registries or selected high-volume centers.In this study, we used health check-ups and insurance claims database from a Japanese insurance organization. The study population was comprised of 1777 patients who underwent catheter ablation for AF before June 2016. During the 3-year follow-up period, 396 (22.3%) patients underwent at least one repeated AF ablation, while 74 (4.2%) underwent two or more repeated ablations. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, longer time after AF diagnosis (7-11 months and ≥12 months versus 1-6 months) (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08 and HR, 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.07) was independently associated with repeated ablation. The discontinuation rates of OACs and AADs after the first ablation were 26.7% and 63.0% at 3 months and 75.2% and 89.1% at 1 year after the initial ablation, respectively. The former was independently associated with shorter time after AF diagnosis and lower diastolic blood pressure, whereas the latter was independently associated with older age, smaller CHADS2 score, and shorter time after AF diagnosis.We presented real-world data regarding the clinical course of young Japanese AF patients after initial catheter ablation based on a claims database in Japan.

Left Atrial Reverse Remodeling Following the Modified Box Isolation with Centerline in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Esophageal injury is a rare but serious complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. To minimize esophageal injury, our persistent AF (PerAF) protocol involves complete left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) and pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (box isolation), with a centerline away from the esophagus. However, there has been a concern that extensive LA isolation might deteriorate LA function. There has been a paucity of data on LA remodeling after box isolation. Therefore, we compared LA size pre- and post-box isolation with an LAPW centerline in patients with PerAF.Patients who underwent catheter ablation (CA) for PerAF between November 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.The LAPW, including all PVs, was completely isolated in 105 consecutive patients (75 men; mean age: 68 ± 10 years) with PerAF, including 58 patients with long-standing PerAF. During a follow-up of 660 ± 332 days, 76 patients (72%) were arrhythmia-free. The LA dimension (38 ± 6 mm versus 42 ± 7 mm; P < 0.0001) and volume index (38 ± 13 mL/m2 versus 47 ± 14 mL/m2; P < 0.0001) at 6 months post-ablation were significantly decreased in patients who maintained sinus rhythm compared to pre-ablation. In patients with recurrent AF/atrial tachycardia (AT), these parameters were also significantly decreased (P < 0.001, respectively).Box isolation with a posterior centerline has no esophageal complications and a high clinical success rate in patients with PerAF. Reverse remodeling could be achieved even when using extensive isolation of the PV and LAPW in patients with PerAF.

Formula to estimate left atrial volume using antero-posterior diameter in patients with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

ABSTRACT: In patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, an enlarged left atrium (LA) is a predictor of procedural failure as well as AF recurrence on long term. The most used method to assess LA size is echocardiography-measured diameter, but the most accurate remains computed tomography (CT).The aim of our study was to determine whether there is an association between left atrial diameters measured in echocardiography and the left atrial volume determined by CT in patients who underwent AF ablation.The study included 93 patients, of whom 60 (64.5%) were men and 64 (68.8%) had paroxysmal AF, who underwent AF catheter ablation between January 2018 and June 2019. Left atrial diameters in echocardiography were measured from the long axis parasternal view and the LA volume in CT was measured on reconstructed three-dimensional images.The LA in echocardiography had an antero-posterior (AP) diameter of 45.0 ±â€Š6 mm (median 45; Inter Quartile Range [IQR] 41-49, range 25-73 mm), longitudinal diameter of 67.5 ±â€Š9.4 (median 66; IQR 56-88, range 52-100 mm), and transversal diameter of 42 ±â€Š8.9 mm (IQR 30-59, range 23-64.5 mm). The volume in CT was 123 ±â€Š29.4 mL (median 118; IQR 103-160; range 86-194 mL). We found a significant correlation (r = 0.702; P < .05) between the AP diameter and the LA volume. The formula according to which the AP diameter of the LA can predict the volume was: LA volume = AP diam3 + 45 mL.There is a clear association between the left atrial AP diameter measured on echocardiography and the volume measured on CT. The AP diameter might be sufficient to determine the increase in the volume of the atrium and predict cardiovascular outcomes.

Comparison of lesion characteristics between conventional and high-power short-duration ablation using contact force-sensing catheter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Transmural lesion creation is essential for effective atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Lesion characteristics between conventional energy and high-power short-duration (HPSD) setting in contact force-guided (CF) ablation for AF remained unclear. METHODS: Eighty consecutive AF patients who received CF with conventional energy setting (power control: 25-30 W, force-time integral = 400 g s, n = 40) or with HPSD (power control: 40-50 W, 10 s, n = 40) ablation were analyzed. Of them, 15 patients in each conventional and HPSD group were matched by age and gender respectively for ablation lesions analysis. Type A and B lesions were defined as a lesion with and without significant voltage reduction after ablation, respectively. The anatomical distribution of these lesions and ablation outcomes among the 2 groups were analyzed. RESULTS: 1615 and 1724 ablation lesions were analyzed in the conventional and HPSD groups, respectively. HPSD group had a higher proportion of type A lesion compared to conventional group (P < 0.01). In the conventional group, most type A lesions were at the right pulmonary vein (RPV) posterior wall (50.2%) whereas in the HPSD group, most type A lesions were at the RPV anterior wall (44.0%) (P = 0.04). The procedure time and ablation time were significantly shorter in the HPSD group than that in the conventional group (91.0 ± 12.1 vs. 124 ± 14.2 min, P = 0.03; 30.7 ± 19.2 vs. 57.8 ± 21 min, P = 0.02, respectively). At a mean follow-up period of 11 ± 1.4 months, there were 13 and 7 patients with recurrence in conventional and HPSD group respectively (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Optimal ablation lesion characteristics and distribution after conventional and HPSD ablation differed significantly. HPSD ablation had shorter ablation time and lower recurrence rate than did conventional ablation.

Ablation Versus Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Racial and Ethnic Minorities.

BACKGROUND: Rhythm control strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF), including catheter ablation, are substantially underused in racial/ethnic minorities in North America. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe outcomes in the CABANA trial as a function of race/ethnicity. METHODS: CABANA randomized 2,204 symptomatic participants with AF to ablation or drug therapy including rate and/or rhythm control drugs. Only participants in North America were included in the present analysis, and participants were subgrouped as racial/ethnic minority or nonminority with the use of National Institutes of Health definitions. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest. RESULTS: Of 1,280 participants enrolled in CABANA in North America, 127 (9.9%) were racial and ethnic minorities. Compared with nonminorities, racial and ethnic minorities were younger with median age 65.6 versus 68.5 years, respectively, and had more symptomatic heart failure (37.0% vs 22.0%), hypertension (92.1% vs 76.8%, respectively), and ejection fraction <40% (20.8% vs 7.1%). Racial/ethnic minorities treated with ablation had a 68% relative reduction in the primary endpoint (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13-0.78) and a 72% relative reduction in all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.79). Primary event rates in racial/ethnic minority and nonminority participants were similar in the ablation arm (4-year Kaplan-Meier event rates 12.3% vs 9.9%); however, racial and ethnic minorities randomized to drug therapy had a much higher event rate than nonminority participants (27.4% vs. 9.4%). CONCLUSION: Among racial or ethnic minorities enrolled in the North American CABANA cohort, catheter ablation significantly improved major clinical outcomes compared with drug therapy. These benefits, which were not seen in nonminority participants, appear to be due to worse outcomes with drug therapy. (Catheter Ablation vs Anti-arrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation Trial [CABANA]; NCT00911508).

Treatment timing and the effects of rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation: nationwide cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the results of a rhythm control strategy differ according to the duration between diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and treatment initiation. DESIGN: Longitudinal observational cohort study. SETTING: Population based cohort from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. PARTICIPANTS: 22 635 adults with atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular conditions, newly treated with rhythm control (antiarrhythmic drugs or ablation) or rate control strategies between 28 July 2011 and 31 December 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A composite outcome of death from cardiovascular causes, ischaemic stroke, admission to hospital for heart failure, or acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Of the study population, 12 200 (53.9%) were male, the median age was 70, and the median follow-up duration was 2.1 years. Among patients with early treatment for atrial fibrillation (initiated within one year since diagnosis), compared with rate control, rhythm control was associated with a lower risk of the primary composite outcome (weighted incidence rate per 100 person years 7.42 in rhythm control v 9.25 in rate control; hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 0.93; P=0.002). No difference in the risk of the primary composite outcome was found between rhythm and rate control (weighted incidence rate per 100 person years 8.67 in rhythm control v 8.99 in rate control; 0.97, 0.78 to 1.20; P=0.76) in patients with late treatment for atrial fibrillation (initiated after one year since diagnosis). No significant differences in safety outcomes were found between the rhythm and rate control strategies across different treatment timings. Earlier initiation of treatment was linearly associated with more favourable cardiovascular outcomes for rhythm control compared with rate control. CONCLUSIONS: Early initiation of rhythm control treatment was associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes than rate control treatment in patients with recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation. This association was not found in patients who had had atrial fibrillation for more than one year.

Organization and procedures in contemporary catheter ablation centres: data from the 2018 Italian Catheter Ablation Registry.

AIMS: This report describes the findings of the 2018 Italian Catheter Ablation Registry of the Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing (AIAC). METHODS: The Italian Catheter Ablation Registry systematically collects data on the ablation procedures performed in Italy. Data collection was retrospective. A standardized questionnaire was completed by participating centres. RESULTS: We collected data on 15 714 catheter ablation procedures performed in Italy during 2018 in 94 electrophysiology centres. In most centres (75/94, 80%), a single electrophysiology laboratory was available, and a hybrid electrophysiology laboratory was available in 15% (14/94) of centres. In most (93%) centres, at least two electrophysiologists were involved in the catheter ablation procedures. In only 13 out of 94 (14%) electrophysiology laboratories, an anaesthesiologist assists every electrophysiology procedure; in most cases (74/94, 79%), an on-demand anaesthesiology service was available. On-site cardiothoracic surgery was reported in 43 out of 94 (46%) centres.Nonfluoroscopic navigation systems were available in most centres (88/94, 93%). Intracardiac echocardiography was used in 59 out of 94 (63%) electrophysiology laboratories. Atrial fibrillation (31%) was the most frequently treated ablation target, followed by atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (20%) and cavo-tricuspid isthmus (15%). In 61.7% of all procedures, a 3D mapping system was used. In about one-third of procedures, a near-zero approach was performed. CONCLUSION: In most Italian electrophysiology centres, a single electrophysiology laboratory was available and at least two electrophysiologists were involved in the ablation procedures. An increasing number of procedures were performed by means of a nonfluoroscopic mapping system with a near-zero approach.

First-line therapy: insights from a real-world analysis of cryoablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is mainly reserved for patients with drug-refractory or drug-intolerant symptomatic atrial fibrillation. We evaluated a large cohort of patients treated in a real-world setting and examined the safety and efficacy profile of CBA when applied as a first-line treatment for atrial fibrillation. METHODS: In total, 249 patients (23% women; 56 ±â€Š13 years; mean left atrial diameter 41 ±â€Š7 mm; 73.5% paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; and 26.5% persistent atrial fibrillation) underwent an index PVI by CBA. Data were collected prospectively in the framework of the 1STOP ClinicalService project, involving 26 Italian cardiology centers. RESULTS: Median procedure and fluoroscopy times were 90.0 and 21.0 min, respectively. Acute procedural success was 99.8%. Acute/periprocedural complications were observed in seven patients (2.8%), including: four transient diaphragmatic paralyses, one pericardial effusion (not requiring any intervention), one transient ischemic attack, and one minor vascular complication. The Kaplan--Meier freedom from atrial fibrillation recurrence was 86.3% at 12 months and 76% at 24 months. Seventeen patients (6.8%) had a repeat catheter ablation procedure during the follow-up period. At last follow-up, 10% of patients were on an anticoagulation therapy, whereas 6.8% were on an antiarrhythmic drug. CONCLUSION: In our multicenter real-world experience, PVI by CBA in a first-line atrial fibrillation patient population was well tolerated, effective, and promising. CBA with a PVI strategy can be used to treat patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation with good acute procedural success, short procedure times, and acceptable safety. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01007474).

The effect of concomitant chronic kidney disease on the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Some new trials have reported the effectiveness of chronic kidney disease on recurrence of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation. Limited by small number of studies and insufficient outcomes, previous meta-analyses also failed to draw a consistent conclusion on this topic. We thus conducted a new meta-analysis to systematically analyze the effect of chronic kidney disease on recurrence of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation. METHODS: Two independent investigators followed The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines to conduct the present meta-analysis. From the inception to June 2021, the EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched using the key phrases "atrial fibrillation," "chronic kidney disease," "catheter ablation," "renal failure," "renal function," "renal insufficiency," "end-stage renal disease," and "dialysis" for all relevant English-language trials. Observational or randomized controlled trial focusing on assessing the effectiveness of chronic kidney disease on recurrence of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation was included. P < .05 was set as the significance level. RESULTS: Our hypothesis was that chronic kidney disease is associated with increased atrial fibrosis and a higher risk of arrhythmia recurrence and that restoration of normal rhythm through catheter ablation is associated with improved kidney function. REGISTRATION NUMBER: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3WJAE.

Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Management of Incident Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Importance: In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), rhythm control with either antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) or catheter ablation has been associated with decreased symptoms, prevention of adverse remodeling, and improved cardiovascular outcomes. Adoption of advanced cardiovascular therapeutics, however, is often slower among patients from racial/ethnic minority groups and those with lower income. Objective: To ascertain the cumulative rates of AAD and catheter ablation use for the management of paroxysmal AF and to investigate for the presence of inequities in AF management by evaluating the association of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status with their use in the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study obtained inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy claims data from the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart between October 1, 2015, and June 30, 2019. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) in the database with a diagnosis of incident paroxysmal AF were identified. Patients were excluded if they did not have continuous insurance enrollment for at least 1 year before and at least 6 months after study entry. Exposures: Race/ethnicity and zip code-linked median household income. Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment with a rhythm control strategy, and catheter ablation specifically, among those who received rhythm control. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association of race/ethnicity and zip code-linked median household income with a rhythm control strategy (AADs or catheter ablation) vs a rate control strategy as well as with catheter ablation vs AADs among those receiving rhythm control. Results: Of the 109 221 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 55 185 were men (50.5%) and 73 523 were White (67.3%), with a median (interquartile range) age of 75 (68-82) years. A total of 86 359 patients (79.1%) were treated with rate control, 19 362 patients (17.7%) with AADs, and 3500 (3.2%) with catheter ablation. Between 2016 and 2019, the cumulative percentage of patients treated with catheter ablation increased from 1.6% to 3.8%. In multivariable analyses, Black race (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.94; P < .001) and lower zip code-linked median household income (aOR for <$50 000: 0.83 [95% CI, 0.79-0.87; P < .001]; aOR for $50 000-$99 999: 0.92 [95% CI, 0.88-0.96; P = <.001] compared with ≥$100 000) were independently associated with lower use of rhythm control. Latinx ethnicity (aOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.89; P = .002) and lower zip code-linked median household income (aOR for <$50 000: 0.61 [95% CI, 0.54-0.69; P < .001]; aOR for $50 000-$99 999: 0.81 [95% CI, 0.72-0.90; P < .001] compared with ≥$100 000) were independently associated with lower catheter ablation use among those receiving rhythm control. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that despite increased use of rhythm control strategies for treatment of paroxysmal AF, catheter ablation use remained low and patients from racial/ethnic minority groups and those with lower income were less likely to receive rhythm control treatment, especially catheter ablation. These findings highlight inequities in paroxysmal AF management based on race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Catheter Ablation Compared with Medical Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: The optimal strategy for patients with coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) was not settled. Our purpose was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effect of catheter ablation compared with medical therapy for AF on mortality, HF hospitalization, left ventricular (LV) function, and quality of life among patients with HF and AF. Materials and Methods: We searched Pubmed (1966 to September 20, 2019), EMBASE (1966 to September 20, 2019), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials with a comparison of catheter ablation for AF with medical therapy among patients with coexisting AF and HF. Risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as a measure of the effect of catheter ablation versus medical therapy on endpoints. Our final analysis included 6 randomized control trials with 775 patients. Results: Pooled results from the random-effects model showed that compared with medical therapy for AF, catheter ablation was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.52, 95%Cl, 0.35 to 0.76) and HF hospitalization (RR 0.56, 95%Cl, 0.44 to 0.71), as well as increased LV ejection fraction (LVEF), distance walked in six minutes, and improvements in quality of life. Conclusions: This updated meta-analysis showed that compared to medical therapy, catheter ablation for AF was associated with significant benefits in several key clinical and biomarker endpoints, including reductions in all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization.

Variability and Utilization of Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation Ablation During Mitral Valve Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) at the time of mitral valve surgery is a Society of Thoracic Surgeons Class IA recommendation with evidence from randomized trial data. We hypothesized that concomitant AF ablation rates have increased over time with implementation of this evidence-based practice. METHODS: All patients (N = 7261) undergoing mitral valve operations (2011-2018) were queried from a regional Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Patients with preoperative AF were stratified by concomitant AF ablation. Trends in concomitant ablation were evaluated over time as well as by center and surgeon mitral surgical volume. The associations between patient and center factors on implementation of concomitant ablation were assessed with multivariate regression. RESULTS: A total of 1675 patients with preoperative AF underwent isolated mitral valve operations, with 1044 (64.6%) undergoing concomitant ablation. The utilization of concomitant ablation decreased over the study period (-2.82%/year), and was strongly associated with surgeon mitral valve volume (high 78.2% vs medium 62.5% vs low 59.0%; P < .001). Multivariate regression demonstrated age and comorbidities were strong predictors, but high volume mitral surgeons (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; P < .001) were twice as likely to perform concomitant AF ablation. Finally, patients with preoperative AF undergoing ablation were significantly less likely to be in AF at discharge (10.1% vs 53.8%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing evidence and societal recommendations, we demonstrate a persistent underutilization of concomitant AF ablation during isolated mitral surgery across a large number of low-volume and high-volume centers. These data suggest significant variability and may represent an opportunity for improvement.

Should concomitant surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation be performed in elderly patients?

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of atrial fibrillation increases with age, and therefore many elderly patients presenting for cardiac surgery have atrial fibrillation. In recent publications, increasing age has been recognized as a predictor for ablation failure. Furthermore, many surgeons are reluctant to perform a surgical ablation in elderly patients. We investigated the safety and efficacy of concomitant surgical atrial fibrillation ablation in elderly patients. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2013, 556 patients underwent concomitant surgical atrial fibrillation ablation at the University Heart Center Hamburg and served as our primary study cohort. During follow-up, rhythm monitoring was established by 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram (70.5%) or an implantable loop recorder (29.5%) at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The primary end point of the study was freedom from atrial fibrillation at 12 months follow-up and the detection of deviations from a linear association between age and risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence. A multiple logistic regression model including age as a linear term was used to identify predictors for rhythm outcome. RESULTS: Mean patients' age was 68.4 ± 9.07 years, and 67.3% of the patients were male. Mean duration of atrial fibrillation was 3.5 ± 3.3 years, and mean left atrium diameters were enlarged with 50.5 ± 8.8 mm. There were no major ablation-related complications. The 30-day and 1-year survivals were 97.7% and 95.8%, respectively. The overall rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation ranged from 62% to 72% and was independent of age. The age-dependent risk of atrial fibrillation at 12 months was significantly increased in elderly patients undergoing a concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Multiple logistic regression model revealed double valve procedures (odds ratio, 3.48; P = .020), preoperative persistent atrial fibrillation (odds ratio, 2.43; P = .001), and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in elderly patients (odds ratio, 2.03; P = .009) as risk factors for recurrence of atrial fibrillation. Sinus rhythm at discharge (odds ratio, 0.39; P < .001) and bipolar ablation (odds ratio, 0.32; P < .001) were significant predictors for successful ablation. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical atrial fibrillation ablation was safe and effective independently of age. Sinus rhythm at discharge and bipolar ablation were significant predictors for successful ablation, whereas double valve procedures, preoperative persistent atrial fibrillation, and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in elderly patients were risk factors for recurrence of atrial fibrillation.