[TruClear™ treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy interrupted after methotrexate injection]. / Résection mécanique hystéroscopique de résidus trophoblastique d'une grossesse sur cicatrice de césarienne après injection de méthotrexate.

BACKGROUND: Cesarean scar pregnancy is a complicated and potentially life-threatening type of ectopic pregnancy. There is no gold standard for its management. The aim is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of treatment by hysteroscopic tissue removal system after systemic methotrexate injection. METHODS: We report the case of a 27-year-old patient who had previously had a C-section and who presented herself to the emergency room with pelvic pain and metrorrhagia. The human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) serum level was positive. The exploration revealed an ectopic pregnancy on the cesarean scar. She benefited of 4 systemic injections of methotrexate. As the hCG became negative, endovaginal ultrasound confirmed the avascular nature of the mass. Surgical resection by mechanical morcellation hysteroscopy (TruClear™) was performed under general anaesthesia, visual control and ultrasound guidance. RESULTS: This procedure was successful. It was an ambulatory procedure and there were neither intra- nor postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first time in Belgium that a hysteroscopic tissue removal system procedure has been used to treat a caesarean scar pregnancy. This technique seems to be safe for both the patient and the surgeon and could become a new approach for cesarean scar pregnancy management.

CONTEXTE: La grossesse sur cicatrice de césarienne est définie comme la présence d'un sac gestationnel dans une isthmocèle créée par une hystérotomie préalable. Il n'existe pas de gold standard concernant sa prise en charge. L'objectif est de démontrer l'efficacité et la sécurité du traitement par résection mécanique hystéroscopique des tissus après injection systémique de méthotrexate. Méthodes : Nous rapportons le cas d'une patiente de 27 ans ayant déjà eu une césarienne et qui s'est présentée aux urgences avec des douleurs pelviennes et des métrorragies. L'exploration révèle une grossesse sur la cicatrice de césarienne. Elle a bénéficié de 4 injections systémiques de méthotrexate. La résection des résidus trophoblastiques avasculaires a été réalisée par voie hystéroscopique en utilisant l'hystéroscope par action mécanique de type -TruClear™ et ce, sous contrôle échographique concomitant. Résultats : Cette procédure ambulatoire effectuée sous anesthésie générale a été un succès. Il n'y a eu aucune complication per- ou postopératoire. CONCLUSIONS: À notre connaissance, c'est la première fois qu'une résection par action mécanique des résidus trophoblastiques sur cicatrice de césarienne est réalisée en Belgique. Cette technique semble sûre pour la patiente et le chirurgien et pourrait devenir une nouvelle approche pour la prise en charge d'une grossesse sur cicatrice de césarienne.

Successful Management of Cervical and Tubal Stump Double Pregnancy after Assisted Reproductive Technologies Using Multiple High Doses of Methotrexate: A Case Report.

The incidence of ectopic pregnancy (EP) has increased in recent years, owing to causes such as pelvic inflammatory diseases and assisted reproductive technologies (ART). The present study reported a case of a 33-year-old nulliparous woman with a history of previous ectopic pregnancies, who underwent pelvic ultrasound in August 2022, which revealed a double EP including a cervical pregnancy and a tubal stump pregnancy. Despite known risk factors and elevated beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) levels, a conservative approach, utilizing multiple doses of systemic methotrexate (MTX) injections, was employed to preserve fertility at the Regional Perinatal Center in Aktobe, Kazakhstan. Treatment efficacy was monitored through ß-hCG levels and ultrasound imaging, with successful resolution of both EPs and preservation of reproductive function. The present case highlighted the safety and efficacy of MTX therapy in managing complex EP presentations, emphasizing the necessity of individualized treatment approaches in reproductive medicine, particularly in terms of preserving fertility in patients undergoing ART. Multiple high doses of MTX injections were beneficial for pregnancy with two distinct regions, fetal cardiac activity, and elevated serum ß-hCG level. Further research is required to explore optimal treatment strategies for EP, considering patient-specific factors and treatment goals.

A 20 year experience in the management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary hospital - a retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Non-tubal ectopic pregnancies account for < 10% of all ectopic pregnancies. Due to its rarity and wide variation in clinical practice, there is no guideline or consensus for its management. We reported our 20-year experience in the management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all women admitted for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies from January 2003 to December 2022 in a tertiary hospital. Women with non-tubal ectopic pregnancies diagnosed by ultrasound or operation were included for analysis. RESULTS: Within the study period, 180 women were diagnosed to have non-tubal ectopic pregnancies at a mean gestation of 6.8 weeks. 16.7% (30/180) were conceived via assisted reproduction. Medical treatment was the first-line management option for 81 women, of which 75 (92.1%) women received intralesional methotrexate administered under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. The success rate of intralesional methotrexate ranges from 76.5% to 92.3%. Intralesional methotrexate was successful even in cases with a positive fetal pulsation or with high human chorionic gonadotrophin levels up to 252605U/L. Twenty seven women were managed expectantly and 40 underwent surgery. Nine (11.1%), two (6.1%), and one (2.3%) women required surgery due to massive or recurrent bleeding following medical, expectant, or surgical treatment. Hysterotomy and uterine artery embolization were necessary to control bleeding in one Caesarean scar and one cervical pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Intralesional methotrexate is more effective than systemic methotrexate and should be considered as first line medical treatment for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies. It has a high success rate in the management of unruptured non-tubal ectopic pregnancies even in the presence of fetal pulsations or high human chorionic gonadotrophin levels, but patients may require a prolonged period of monitoring. Close surveillance and readily available surgery were required due to the risk of heavy post-procedural intra-abdominal bleeding.

Direct Visualization of a Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy After Medical Management.

BACKGROUND Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy is a rare type of ectopic pregnancy that can result in severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Medical, surgical, and minimally invasive therapies alone or in combination have been described in the literature, but the optimal treatment modality of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies is unknown. Limited information exists on the course of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy following treatment with cytotoxic agents. CASE REPORT We present a case of a woman with a history of multiple cesarean births that was provided with medical abortion for an unintended pregnancy. However, upon follow-up, the patient was found to have a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Following the diagnosis, she was treated by multi-dose systemic methotrexate-leucovorin and with ultrasound-guided intra-gestational sac injection of potassium chloride. After resolution of beta human gonadotropin levels, ultrasound follow-up revealed persistence of residual tissue in the cesarean scar. The patient elected for resection of the residual tissue with operative hysteroscopy. We report a novel hysteroscopic finding after medical treatment of a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with intra-gestational sac injection of potassium chloride. CONCLUSIONS Direct visualization of the intra-abdominal cavity and intra-uterine cavity showed that combined medical management with systemic methotrexate and local potassium chloride injection is an effective treatment modality for live cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies, with minimal anatomical harm. Hysteroscopic resection offers a safe and effective approach for removal of persistence of residual tissue.

Comparing the effectiveness of letrozole versus methotrexate for treatment of ectopic pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of two different regimens of Letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, in the management of ectopic pregnancy compared to methotrexate. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 88 women diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy with a baseline level of serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin under 3000 mIU/mL between June 30, 2023, and December 30, 2023, at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Vali-e-Asr Hospital affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Participants were allocated into either methotrexate (n = 43), 5-day course Letrozole (n = 24), or 10-day course Letrozole (n = 21) treatments. The methotrexate group received a single dose of 50 mg/m2 dosage intramuscular methotrexate. The 5-day Letrozole group received a 2.5 mg Letrozole tablet three times daily for 5 days, whereas the 10-day Letrozole group received a 2.5 mg Letrozole tablet twice daily for 10 days. The primary outcome was the treatment response, defined as the achievement of a negative serum beta-human chorionic level without the need for additional methotrexate treatment or surgery. The secondary outcomes were the need for additional methotrexate dose or laparoscopic surgery intervention. The trial protocol was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov with code NCT05918718. RESULTS: The treatment response rates in methotrexate, 5-day Letrozole, and 10-day Letrozole groups were 76.7 %, 75.0 %, and 90.5 %, respectively, with no significant differences between the groups (P-value = 0.358). A total of 10 (23.3 %) patients from the methotrexate group, 3 (12.5 %) from the 5-day Letrozole group, and 2 (9.5 %) from the 10-day Letrozole group required an additional methotrexate dose, with no significant differences between the groups (P-value = 0.307). Furthermore, only 3 (12.5 %) patients, all from the 5-day Letrozole group, were suspected of tubal rupture and underwent surgery (P-value = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest Letrozole as a safe alternative to methotrexate in treating stable ectopic pregnancies, with a favorable treatment response rate. However, there is still a need for future larger studies to determine the applicability of Letrozole in the EP management. Also, the non-significant higher effectiveness of the 10-day Letrozole regimen than the 5-day Letrozole group underscores the need for future research to determine the optimal Letrozole regimen for the management of ectopic pregnancy.

The effects of conservative and surgical approaches in tubal ectopic pregnancy on fertility.

BACKGROUND: Medical treatment, expectant approaches, and surgical treatment options are available in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Regardless of the treatment, in addition to its effectiveness, the main concern is to limit the risk of relapse and preserve fertility. OBJECTIVES: Determine the impact of medical or surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy on future fertility. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Department of obstrtrics and gynecolgy at Ankara Etlik Zübeyde Hanim Women's Health Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were treated for ectopic pregnancy between June 2016 and November 2019 were allocated into two groups. Expectant approach or medical treatment by methotrexate constituted the conservative treatment group while salpingectomy by laparoscopy indicated the surgical treatment group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fertility rates within two years following treatment were evaluated according to treatment options. SAMPLE SIZE: 202 patients. RESULTS: Of the 202 patients, 128 had medical treatment and 74 patients had surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy. Of 272 diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy, 70 were excluded for various reasons. Parity and unemployment rate was significantly higher in the surgical treatment (P=.006 and P=.12, respectively). Moreover, ectopic mass size and serum ß-hCG levels were significantly higher in the surgical treatment group (P<.001 and P<.001, respectively). There were no significant differences between the conservative and surgical treatment groups in time to pregnancy (17.0 months vs 19.0 months, P=.255). Similarly, there was no significant difference between the conservative and surgical treatment groups with respect to history of infertility (P=.12). There were no significant differences between the conservative and surgical treatment groups in terms of live birth (51.6% vs 44.6%) and ectopic pregnancy (2.3% vs 1.4%) (P=.72 for both). There was no significant difference between the conservative and surgical treatment groups with respect to infertility rate (35.9% vs 41.9%, P=.72) and admittance to the IVF program (3.9% vs 6.8%, P=.39) following ectopic pregnancy treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Reproductive outcomes did not differ significantly in women undergoing expectant management, medical treatment, and surgery for ectopic pregnancy. This finding suggests that clinicians should not hesitate to act in favor of surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy even if there were concerns for future fertility. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study.

Efficacy and safety of isosorbide mononitrate plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in the management of the first and second trimester abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: However, misoprostol is often used to terminate a pregnancy, but it can also cause side effects. Isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) can help the cervix mature by increasing the production of prostaglandin E2 and vasodilation. Considering that the results of studies in this field are contradictory, it is the purpose of this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vaginal ISMN plus misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone in the management of first- and second-trimester abortions. METHOD: The search process was conducted for MEDLINE through the PubMed interface, Scopus, Web-of-Science, Science Direct, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform until November 10, 2023. Our assessment of bias was based on version 2 of the risk-of-bias tool (RoB2) for randomized trials and our level of evidence quality was determined by GRADE. Meta-analysis of all data was carried out using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.1. RESULT: Seven randomized clinical trials were included in the systematic review and three in the meta-analysis, with mixed quality. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that in the second-trimester abortion, the inclusion of ISMN in conjunction with vaginal misoprostol results in a noteworthy reduction in the induction abortion interval, specifically by 4.21 h (95% CI: -7.45 to -0.97, P = 0.01). The addition of vaginal ISMN to misoprostol, compared to vaginal misoprostol alone, increased the odds of a completed abortion by 3.76 times. (95% CI: 1.08 to 13.15, P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study can offer valuable insights aimed at enhancing counseling and support for non-surgical methods of medication abortion within professional settings. Moreover, it improves the effectiveness of clinical treatment and reduces the occurrence of unnecessary surgical interventions in the abortion management protocol.

Availability of mifepristone and misoprostol in Oregon pharmacies: A comparison by rural and urban status.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the availability of mifepristone and misoprostol at pharmacies in a state with protective abortion legislation and variation in access by rurality. STUDY DESIGN: Using a secret shopper survey, researchers attempted to contact all community pharmacies in Oregon and evaluate their mifepristone and misoprostol provisions. RESULTS: Among the 444 pharmacies surveyed, mifepristone was planned at 19.2%. Misoprostol was available at 77.5%, but stocking issues and medication ordering impact access, without significant differences by rurality. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy engagement and support are key to increasing access to these essential medicines, which may be improved through education and referral programs.

Mifepristone and misoprostol in California pharmacies after modifications to the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy Program.

In January 2023, the Food & Drug Administration modified the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy program regulating mifepristone to allow direct dispensation from retail pharmacies. In June 2023, we conducted a random, distributive survey of pharmacies in California using secret shopper methodology to investigate the feasibility of accessing mifepristone. One pharmacy had mifepristone immediately available (<24 hours), and misoprostol availability was limited. Accessibility to misoprostol varied by type of pharmacy (p < 0.01), but not by region. Even in a reproductive freedom state, access to mifepristone and misoprostol from outpatient retail pharmacies remains limited.

"That's a tricky one": Access to misoprostol for early pregnancy loss in retail pharmacies across Arizona.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to describe the same-day availability of misoprostol for medical management of early pregnancy loss (EPL) at Arizona pharmacies. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a simulated-patient mixed methods study of Arizona pharmacies from October 2022 to February 2023, documenting misoprostol availability and describing pharmacy staff responses. RESULTS: Of 941 pharmacies included, 703 (75%) could fill a misoprostol prescription same day. Ability to fill prescriptions and reasons why the prescription could not be filled varied by pharmacy type. National chain pharmacies most frequently had misoprostol available but also most commonly reported policies restricting dispensing. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers exist to filling misoprostol prescriptions for early pregnancy loss in Arizona that could impact patient care.

How Effective Is Misoprostol Alone for Medication Abortion?

AbstractWith recent severe restrictions to abortion accessibility in the United States and a pending Supreme Court case challenging the Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone, evidence-based strategies to protect and expand access to abortion care are needed. Two safe and effective regimens for medication abortion are widely used globally - misoprostol-only and misoprostol in combination with mifepristone. However, misoprostol-only regimens are rarely used in the United States. In 2023, the National Abortion Federation and the Society of Family Planning updated their recommended protocol for misoprostol-only for medication abortion to 800 µg of misoprostol administered buccally, sublingually, or vaginally every 3 hours for three or more doses. To characterize the data supporting this specific regimen, this article reviews the relevant literature to address the question of how effective misoprostol-only is for medication abortion. The authors conclude that the updated misoprostol regimen is highly effective and a potential strategy for expanding access to abortion.

Comparison of single- and double-dose methotrexate protocols for treatment of pregnancy of unknown location.

OBJECTIVE: The use of various methotrexate (MTX) protocols for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy is well established. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of single- and double-dose MTX protocols for the treatment of pregnancy of unknown location (PUL). STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Gynaecological Endocrinology, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland. Haemodynamically stable women with PUL were enrolled between January 2014 and September 2023. Demographics, gestational age and treatment outcomes were compared between women in the single-dose MTX group and women in the double-dose MTX group. The primary outcome was the success rate, measured as the number of women treated without surgical intervention. The secondary outcome was the number of days of MTX needed to achieve an appropriate decrease in beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (ß-hCG). RESULTS: Two hundred and eleven women (mean age 33 ± 1.8 years) with PUL were enrolled in the study, with an overall success rate of 89.1 %. Single- and double-dose MTX protocols were found to have comparable treatment success rates (93 % and 95 %, respectively). Women with lower initial serum ß-hCG (<2000 mIU/ml) had higher treatment efficacy compared with women with higher initial serum ß-hCG (96.5 % vs 71.4 %), regardless of protocol type. The length of hospital stay for the women treated with the single-dose MTX protocol was 1 day shorter compared with that for the women treated with the double-dose MTX protocol. CONCLUSION: Single- and double-dose MTX protocols have comparable efficacy and safety, and should be equally considered in women with PUL with initial ß-hCG < 2000 mIU/ml.

The MISOPRED score: Development and validation of a clinical scoring system to predict the effectiveness of Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy loss.

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy loss has varied success demonstrated in previous studies. Incorporating predictors in a single clinical scoring system would be highly beneficial in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate the accuracy of a scoring system to predict misoprostol treatment outcomes for managing early pregnancy loss. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort and validation study. METHODS: Patients discharged from the gynecologic emergency department from 2013 to 2016, diagnosed with early pregnancy loss, who were treated with 800 mcg misoprostol, administrated vaginally were included. All were sonographically reevaluated within 48-72 hours. Patients in whom the gestational sac was not expelled or with endometrial lining >30 mm were offered a repeat dose and returned for reevaluation after seven days. A successful response was defined as complete expulsion. Clinical data were reviewed to identify predictors for successful responses. The scoring system was then retrospectively evaluated on a second cohort to evaluate its accuracy. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors most predictive of treatment response. RESULTS: The development cohort included 126 patients. Six factors were found to be most predictive of misoprostol treatment effectiveness: nulliparity, prior complete spontaneous abortion, gestational age, vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, and mean sac diameter, yielding a score of 0-8 (the MISOPRED score), where 8 represents the highest-likelihood of success. The score was validated retrospectively with 119 participants. Successful response in the group with the lowest likelihood score (score 0-3) was 9%, compared with 82% in the highest likelihood score group (score 7-8). Using the MISOPRED score, approximately 15% of patients previously planned to receive misoprostol treatment can be referred for surgical management. CONCLUSIONS: MISOPRED score can be utilized as an adjunct tool for clinical decision-making in cases of Early pregnancy loss. To our knowledge, this is the first scoring system suggested to predict the success rate in these cases.

24-Hour Compared With 12-Hour Mifepristone-Misoprostol Interval for Second-Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare 24-hour and 12-hour mifepristone-to-misoprostol intervals for second-trimester medication abortion. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants were allocated to receive mifepristone either 24 hours or 12 hours before misoprostol administration. The primary outcome was the time from the first misoprostol administration to abortion (induction time). Secondary outcomes included the time from mifepristone to abortion (total abortion time); fetal expulsion percentages at 12, 24, and 48 hours after the first misoprostol dose; side effects proportion; and pain and satisfaction scores. A sample size of 40 per group (N=80) was planned to compare the 24- and 12-hour regimens. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled between July 2020 and June 2023, with 40 patients per group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Median induction time was 9.5 hours (95% CI, 10.3-17.8 hours) and 12.5 hours (95% CI, 13.5-20.2 hours) in the 24- and 12-hour interval arms, respectively ( P =.028). Median total abortion time was 33.0 hours (95% CI, 34.2-41.9 hours) and 24.5 hours (95% CI, 25.7-32.4 hours) in the 24- and 12-hour interval groups, respectively ( P <.001). At 12 hours from misoprostol administration, 25 patients (62.5%) in the 24-hour arm and 18 patients (45.0%) in the 12-hour arm completed abortion ( P =.178). At 24 hours from misoprostol administration, 36 patients (90.0%) in the 24-hour arm and 30 patients (75.0%) in the 12-hour arm had complete abortion ( P =.139). The need for additional medication or surgical treatment for uterine evacuation, pain scores, side effects, and satisfaction levels were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: A 24-hour mifepristone-to-misoprostol regimen for medication abortion in the second trimester provides a median 3-hour shorter induction time compared with the 12-hour interval. However, the median total abortion time was 8.5-hours longer in the 24-hour interval regimen. These findings can aid in shared decision making before medication abortion in the second trimester. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04160221.

Medical management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol in emergency departments compared to a Complex Family Planning office: Implementation of a COVID-19 institutional policy change.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the implementation of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical management of early pregnancy loss (EPL) in emergency departments (EDs) by comparing efficacy, complication, and follow-up rates for patients treated in EDs to the Complex Family Planning (CFP) outpatient office. STUDY DESIGN: In COVID-19's first wave, we expanded medical management of EPL to our EDs. This retrospective study evaluated 72 patients receiving mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021, comparing treatment success, safety outcomes, and follow-up rates by location. RESULTS: Thirty-three (46%) patients received care in the ED and 39 (54%) at CFP. Treatment success was lower in EDs (23, 70%) compared to CFP (34, 87%), but after adjusting for insurance status and pregnancy type (miscarriage, uncertain viability, unknown location), this was not significant: adjusted odds ratio 0.48 (95% CI 0.13-1.81). More ED patients underwent emergent interventions (3 vs 0) including two emergent uterine aspirations, one uterine artery embolization, and two blood transfusions. Two cases were attributed to misdiagnosis (cesarean scar and cervical ectopic pregnancies interpreted as incomplete miscarriages) and one to guideline nonadherence. No complications occurred in the CFP group. Follow-up rates were over 80% in both groups. More ED patients engaged in telehealth follow-up (67% vs 18%, p ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this small sample, we observed a trend toward less successful treatment in the ED compared to the CFP office. Both correctly making uncommon diagnoses and adhering to new guidelines presented implementation challenges. IMPLICATIONS: Implementing mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL in our EDs achieved lower rates of pregnancy resolution compared to outpatient management. Complex uncommon diagnoses and implementing new care pathways in EDs may have contributed to complications and highlighted opportunities for improvement. Additional studies are needed to further quantify safety outcomes for EPL management in EDs.

Hysteroscopic subchorionic injection of methotrexate followed by laparoscopic excision of the gestational sac for the management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: an innovative dual approach of a challenging pathology.

OBJECTIVE: To describe an effective two-step surgical approach for the management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies (CSEPs). CSEPs occur at an estimated frequency of 1 in 1,800 pregnancies, constituting approximately 6% of ectopic pregnancies in women with a history of prior cesarean delivery [1, 2]. Despite numerous recommended therapeutic approaches, the most effective treatment strategy remains uncertain [3]. DESIGN: We present an innovative double-step technique for the management of a patient with a CSEP involving hysteroscopic subchorionic injection of methotrexate (MTX), followed by laparoscopic resection of the residual gestational sac and simultaneous repair of the uterine defect. SETTING: Academic tertiary hospital. PATIENT: A 34-year-old G2P1001 with a history of prior cesarean section presented at 10 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound revealed a gestational sac within the niche of the previous cesarean scar, confirming the diagnosis of a CSEP. The patient included in this video gave consent for publication of the video and posting of the video online, including on social media, the journal website, scientific literature websites (such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus, among others), and other applicable sites. INTERVENTION: The initial treatment involved hysteroscopic administration of MTX within the placental intervillous spaces, ensuring precise medication delivery. The administered dose of MTX was 1 mg/kg. Following the normalization of beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (ß-hCG) levels, laparoscopic resection of the remaining gestational sac and reconstruction of the uterine wall defect were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We have implemented a management strategy focusing on ectopic pregnancy removal and addressing defect revision. The hysteroscopic approach allows for a clear assessment of the ectopic pregnancy and facilitates precise MTX administration, enhancing its effectiveness by increasing drug concentration within the placental intervillous space. Delaying surgical repair until after the ß-hCG levels have decreased reduces the risk of excessive bleeding during the procedure, as lower ß-hCG levels are associated with reduced vascularity at the ectopic site. Subsequent laparoscopic resection allows for complete removal of the remaining products of conception and repair of the defect, preserving the uterus and restoring normal anatomy. Compared to other surgical approaches, our two-step approach enables a more precise evaluation of placental implantation, making it a highly effective surgical method. RESULTS: We successfully managed a CSEP using a double-step technique. This involved hysteroscopic injection of subchorionic MTX, followed by laparoscopic resection of the residual gestational sac. Concurrently, we repaired the uterine defect. Both procedures were performed in an outpatient setting without complications detected during or after treatment. At the follow-up visit, the patient reported good health, and subsequent ultrasound confirmed an empty isthmocele. CONCLUSION: This sequential hysteroscopic and laparoscopic approach represents a definitive and effective minimally invasive surgical option for the treatment of CSEP.

Pharmacological treatment of ectopic pregnancy: Accuracy, safety and cost-effectiveness of day 1-7 ß-hCG measurements.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare accuracy, safety and cost-effectiveness of three ß-hCG measurements protocols, applied in managing ectopic pregnancies (EP) with methotrexate (MTX): (1) day 1 to 7 ß-hCG levels, (2) day 1 to 4 ß-hCG levels and (3) day 4 to 7 ß-hCG levels. METHODS: Cost-minimization analysis (CMA) based on a retrospective study of patients treated with single-dose MTX for EP, was evaluated at a single institution between January 2001 to May 2021. Successful MTX treatment was defined as no surgical intervention. We evaluated safety by analyzing cases of day 4 interventions and cases of inconsistency between the different protocols. Predicting accuracy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve. RESULTS: A total of 229 patients with single dose MTX treatment were included. Overall, 184 (80.3%) patients were treated successfully with a single dose of MTX. For days 1 and 7 the optimal cutoff point was 7% reduction in ß-hCG levels with sensitivity, specificity and PPV of 76.6% (69.9-82.5, 95% CI), 75.5% (60.5-87.1, 95% CI) and 92.8% (88.4-95.6, 95% CI), respectively. There was no significant difference between the protocols' AUC. None of the patients had any change of management during their day 4 visit in our 20 years of records. The cost for each visit day (day 4 and 7) was calculated with a total cost of 251 USD per patient. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with MTX for EP, measurement of day 1 and day 7 ß-hCG serum levels has a cost minimization advantage and is not inferior to the traditional protocol for predictive accuracy and safety.

The Safety and Efficacy of a "No Touch" Abortion Program Implemented in the Greater Toronto Area During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of first-trimester "No Touch" medication abortion programs at 2 clinics in Toronto, Ontario during their early implementation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent virtual consultation for mifepristone-misoprostol medication abortion between April 2020-August 2022 at 2 reproductive health clinics. In response to the pandemic, "No Touch" abortion protocols have been developed that align with the Canadian Protocol for the Provision of Medical Abortion via Telemedicine. Records were reviewed for demographic information, clinical course, investigations required, confirmation of complete abortion and adverse events. The primary outcome was complete medication abortion, defined as expulsion of the pregnancy without requiring uterine aspiration. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients had abortions initiated in the "No Touch" or "Low Touch" care pathways and had sufficient follow-up to determine outcomes. Of these patients, 92.8% (95% CI 89.7%-95.8%) had a complete medication abortion (n = 257) and 76.1% (n = 159) remained "No Touch" throughout their care. Investigations were performed for 102 participants before or after their abortion, classifying them as "Low Touch". Nineteen patients (6.9%) underwent uterine aspiration. The rate of adverse events was low, with 1 case of a missed ectopic pregnancy and 1 patient requiring hospitalization for endometritis. CONCLUSIONS: "No Touch" provision of mifepristone-misoprostol medication abortion care was safe and effective with outcomes comparable to previous studies. These results provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of a "No Touch" approach in the Canadian context, which has the potential to reduce barriers to accessing abortion care.

Evaluation of the parameters in predicting single-dose methotrexate therapy success for ectopic pregnancy.

AIM: Methotrexate has demonstrated efficacy in treating ectopic pregnancies. This study explores factors influencing treatment success, focusing on laboratory and ultrasonographic findings, particularly the day 4 to day 1 ß-hCG level ratio. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study was conducted within patients diagnosed with tubal ectopic pregnancy. Patients' characteristics, ultrasound findings, laboratory data, and ß-hCG levels (days 1, 4, 7), and operation findings were reviewed. Women's characteristics were investigated who were treated with single dose of MTX (50 mg/m2). Patients who were performed surgery after MTX treatment were identified as MTX treatment failure. RESULTS: Among 439 women, 259 underwent surgery due to acute symptoms. Of those treated with MTX, 143 experienced treatment success, while 37 underwent surgery after MTX (MTX failure). Comparative analysis revealed significant differences in ß-hCG levels on admission (1128 and 4125 mIU/mL) and the day 4 to day 1 ß-hCG ratio (0.91 and 1.25). The overall MTX success rate was 79%, reaching 93% and 89% for ß-hCG levels <1000 mIU/mL and <2000 mIU/mL, respectively. Success dropped to 50% with levels exceeding 5000 mIU/mL. ROC analysis identified a crucial 2255 mIU/mL cut-off for ß-hCG (sensitivity 70.3% and specificity 68.5%) and a day 4 to day 1 ß-hCG ratio of 95.5% (sensitivity 84.7%, specificity 72.5%, positive predictive value 75.4%) for predicting MTX success. CONCLUSION: Establishing a ß-hCG cutoff can reduce hospital stay. The day 4 to day 1 ß-hCG ratio holds promise as a widely applicable predictor for MTX success or for determining MTX administration on day 4.