Switching from acetate to citrate dialysate in a central concentrate delivery system for high-volume online hemodiafiltration: a retrospective cohort study.

Interest in citrate-based dialysate (Cit-D) is growing due to its benefits, including anticoagulation and dialysis efficacy. However, research on safety and efficiency of Cit-D in high-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF) via central concentrate delivery system (CCDS) is scarce. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of Cit-D when switching from acetate-based dialysate (Acet-D) in high-volume HDF via CCDS. This is a retrospective analysis of 28 patients who underwent post-dilution online HDF via CCDS, who switched from Acet-D to Cit-D. The study period was divided into 3 periods for analysis: 12 weeks using Acet-D (AD period), the first 12 weeks using Cit-D (CD-1 period), and the second 12 weeks using Cit-D (CD-2 period). We collected the laboratory, dialysis, and safety parameters in each period from electrical medical records. After switching from Acet-D to Cit-D, heparin dosage decreased by 17%, whereas the incidence of complications did not increase. Kt/VBUN and urea reduction ratio increased by 4.6% and 2.1%, respectively. Pre-dialysis beta2-microglobulin concentration decreased after using Cit-D. The corrected calcium levels decreased in the CD-1 period compared to the AD period, but in CD-2, they subsequently increased to levels similar to those observed during the AD period. Symptomatic hypocalcemia did not occur, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of hyperparathyroidism. Endotoxin levels and the bacterial culture of ultrapure dialysate were unremarkable throughout all periods. These results might suggest that Cit-D could potentially offer advantages over Acet-D, such as reducing the heparin dose and increasing dialysis efficiency, in patients undergoing high-volume HDF using CCDS.

Preparation and In Vitro Evaluation of Montelukast Sodium-Loaded 3D Printed Orodispersible Films for the Treatment of Asthma.

This research aims to produce orodispersible films (ODFs) and determine their potential use in the oral delivery of montelukast sodium for asthma treatment and allergic rhinitis. ODFs were successfully developed by Three-dimensional (3D) printing using propylene glycol (PG), and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG). Finally, the amount of montelukast sodium in the ODFs was 5% (w/w). Drug-excipients compatibility with Fourier Transformed Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, mass uniformity, thickness, disintegration time, folding endurance, moisture absorption, pH, in vitro drug release (dissolution), drug content, moisture loss, moisture content, mechanical properties, and cytotoxicity studies were performed on the prepared films. All formulations disintegrated in approximately 40 s. Over 98% of drug release from all films within 2 min was confirmed. It was reported that Fm1-4 (8% HPMC and 1% PEG) and Fm2-4 (10% HPMC and 3% PEG) are more suitable for drug content, but Fm2-4 may be the ideal formulation considering its durability and transportability properties. Based on the characterization results and in vitro release values, the montelukast sodium ODF can be an option for other dosage forms. It was concluded that the formulations did not show toxic potential by in vitro cytotoxicity study with 3T3 cells. This new formulation can efficiently treat allergic rhinitis and asthma diseases.

[Modern approaches to rational combination pharmacotherapy of allergic rhinitis]. / Sovremennye podkhody k ratsional'noi kombinirovannoi farmakoterapii allergicheskogo rinita.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) can significantly reduce the quality of life of patients leading to increased fatigue, mood changes, cognitive impairment, and depression. In clinical practice, insufficient effectiveness of initial AR monotherapy is often noted, and a significant proportion of patients referring for medical care have moderate-severe AR. In this regard, the issues of optimization of combined pharmacological treatment of AR are becoming more and more urgent. This paper provides analysis of the opportunities of combined pharmacotherapy within the framework of current management strategy of AR. Based on the results of some studies and known pharmacological properties of medications it is being discussed the advantages of combined use of intranasal corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists, in particular mometasone furoate and montelukast, in the therapy of AR, including such comorbidities as bronchial asthma, chronic polyposis rhinosinusitis and pharyngeal tonsil hyperplasia. Some aspects of combination therapy with montelukast and second-generation systemic antihistamines as an alternative approach in case of inability to take intranasal corticosteroids, including the reasonability of using a fixed combination of montelukast and levocetirizine, are analyzed from the perspective of rational pharmacotherapy. The problem of interchangeability of brand-name and generic drugs for the treatment of AR is discussed, considering the almost complete absence of studies of their therapeutic equivalence.

Exploring montelukast in dogs: A preliminary pharmacokinetic study following oral administration under fasted and fed conditions.

This study investigates the pharmacokinetics (PK) of montelukast (MTK), a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist increasingly being considered in veterinary medicine. In dogs, MTK has found indications mainly for treating atopic dermatitis as an off-label use. Six male Labrador dogs underwent a single oral administration of MTK (40 mg/dog) in both fasted and fed conditions according to an open, single-dose, two-treatment, two-phase, cross-over design, with a washout period of one week. Blood was withdrawn to heparinized tubes at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 hr. MTK plasma concentrations were quantified using a validated HPLC method, and the data were analysed using PKanalix™ software with a non-compartmental approach. Concentrations remained quantifiable at 24 hr after administration, under both conditions. No significant differences were observed in the PK parameters between the fasted and fed states. MTK was relatively eliminated slowly, with t1/2 values of 8.10 and 7.68 hr after fasted and fed states, respectively. The attainment of maximum concentration (Cmax) occurred at a Tmax of 4 hr, with mean values of 1.98 µg/mL and 2.80 µg/mL under fasted and fed conditions, respectively. Given the unknown therapeutic range of MTK in dogs and the absence of controlled studies proving its efficacy in this species, further dosing adjustments and refinements should be considered based on both the current PK data and the need to establish an effective therapeutic range, if present. Future research should focus on efficacy studies, multiple-dose investigations, and pharmacodynamic assessments to evaluate the suitability of MTK use in dogs.

Real-world experience with letermovir for cytomegalovirus-prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: A multi-centre observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Efficacy and safety of letermovir as prophylaxis for clinically significant cytomegalovirus infections (csCVMi) was evaluated in randomised controlled trials while most of the real-world studies are single-centre experiences. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multi-centre case-control study at six German university hospitals to evaluate clinical experiences in patients receiving CMV prophylaxis with letermovir (n = 200) compared to controls without CMV prophylaxis (n = 200) during a 48-week follow-up period after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (aHCT). RESULTS: The incidence of csCMVi after aHCT was significantly reduced in the letermovir (34%, n = 68) compared to the control group (56%, n = 112; p < 0.001). Letermovir as CMV prophylaxis (OR 0.362) was found to be the only independent variable associated with the prevention of csCMVi. Patients receiving letermovir showed significantly better survival compared to the control group (HR = 1.735, 95% CI: 1.111-2.712; p = 0.014). Of all csCMVi, 46% (n = 31) occurred after discontinuation of letermovir prophylaxis. Severe neutropenia (<500 neutrophils/µL) on the day of the stem cell infusion was the only independent variable for an increased risk of csCMVi after the end of letermovir prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the preventive effects of letermovir on csCMVi after aHCT. A substantial proportion of patients developed a csCMVi after discontinuation of letermovir. In particular, patients with severe neutropenia require specific attention after drug discontinuation.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Letermovir in Patients Undergoing Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Final Results of Post-Marketing Surveillance in Japan.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common opportunistic infection after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Letermovir, an inhibitor of CMV DNA terminase, is approved for CMV prophylaxis in allo-HSCT patients. We report the final results of post-marketing surveillance of letermovir in Japan. METHODS: The case report forms were drafted in part by the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation using data elements in the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program and sent to individual HSCT centers to decrease the burden of reporting. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients who received letermovir between May 2018 and May 2022 were registered. Data collected included physician-assessed adverse events/adverse drug reactions and clinical effectiveness (development of CMV disease, CMV antigen status, and use of preemptive therapy). RESULTS: A total of 821 HSCT patients were included in the safety analyses. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 11.33% of patients, with serious adverse drug reactions in 3.05%. The five most common adverse drug reactions were nausea (1.58%), renal impairment (1.46%), and acute graft versus host disease, CMV test positive, and hepatic function abnormal (0.61% each). A total of 670 patients were eligible for effectiveness analyses. Among these patients, 16.57% and 28.66% required preemptive therapy through week 14 and week 48, respectively. In addition, relatively few patients developed CMV disease throughout the follow-up period (1.34% at week 14 and 3.85% at week 48). CONCLUSIONS: This final analysis of post-marketing surveillance with up to 48 weeks follow-up period in Japan provides further evidence supporting the safety profile and effectiveness of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in patients undergoing allo-HSCT in real-world settings.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is common after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and causes both directly and indirectly a serious disease that frequently results in the death or severe outcomes for the affected patient. Letermovir is a drug that inhibits CMV replication and infection and can be administered to prevent CMV infection in at-risk patients undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. After it was approved in Japan, a post-marketing surveillance was started in order to confirm the safety profile and effectiveness of letermovir in clinical practice in Japan. The data collected included the adverse drug reactions during treatment and the effectiveness of letermovir. In this article, we describe the final results of this survey. The most common adverse drug reactions were nausea (1.58% of patients), renal impairment (1.46%), and acute graft versus host disease, CMV test positive, and hepatic function abnormal (0.61% each). There were few cases of myelosuppression, which is frequently seen in patients treated with ganciclovir/valganciclovir, and blood cells recovered steadily over time. Cytomegalovirus antigens were detected in 38.36% of patients through 48 weeks. Preemptive therapy was initiated to 28.66% of patients for up to 48 weeks. Cytomegalovirus disease was infrequent, occurring in 3.85% of patients. Overall, these findings are in alignment with the currently approved product label and provide further evidence supporting the consistent safety profile and effectiveness of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in patients in Japan undergoing allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in clinical practice.

Impact of Primary Letermovir Prophylaxis Versus Preemptive Antiviral Therapy for Cytomegalovirus on Economic and Clinical Outcomes after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Preemptive therapy (PET) historically has been the primary strategy to reduce early-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) but is associated with antiviral-associated toxicities and increases in healthcare resource utilization and cost. Despite its high cost, letermovir (LTV) prophylaxis has largely supplanted PET due to its effectiveness and tolerability. Direct comparisons between LTV and PET approaches on economic and clinical outcomes after allogeneic HCT remain limited. Objective: To compare total cost of care (inpatient and outpatient) between LTV prophylaxis and PET through day+180 after allogeneic HCT. Adult allogeneic CMV seropositive (R+) HCT recipients who initiated LTV <30 days after HCT between 01/01/18 and 12/31/18 were matched 1:1 to allogeneic CMV R+ HCT recipients between 01/01/15 and 12/31/17 (PET cohort). Patients were grouped into high-risk (HR) or standard-risk (SR) for CMV to compare the LTV and PET cohorts. Direct costs for each patient's index HCT admission and all subsequent inpatient and outpatient care through day+180 after HCT were determined and converted into 2021 US dollars and then to Medicare proportional dollars (MPD). A secondary analysis using 2019 average wholesale price was conducted to specifically evaluate anti-CMV medication costs. There were a total of 176 patients with 54 HR CMV pairs and 34 SR CMV pairs. No differences in survival between LTV and PET for both HR and SR CMV groups were observed. The rate of clinically significant CMV infection decreased for both HR CMV (11/54, 20.4% versus 38/54, 70.4%, P < .001) and SR CMV (1/34, 2.9% versus 12/34, 35.3%, P < .001) patients who were given LTV prophylaxis with corresponding reductions in val(ganciclovir) and foscarnet (HR CMV only) use. Among HR CMV patients, LTV prophylaxis was associated with reductions in CMV-related readmissions (3/54, 5.6% versus 18/54, 33.3%, P < .001) and outpatient visits within the first 100 days after HCT (20 versus 25, P = .002), and a decreased median total cost of care ($36,018 versus $75,525, P < .001) in MPD was observed. For SR CMV patients on LTV, a significant reduction in the median inpatient cost ($15,668 versus $27,818, P < .001) was found, but this finding was offset by a higher median outpatient cost ($26,145 versus $20,307, P = .030) that was not CMV-driven. LTV prophylaxis is highly effective in reducing clinically significant CMV reactivations for both HR and SR HCT recipients. In this study, LTV prophylaxis was associated with a decreased total cost of care for HR CMV patients through day+180. Specifically, reductions in CMV-related readmissions, exposure to CMV-directed antiviral agents, and outpatient visits in the first 100 days after HCT were observed. SR CMV patients receiving LTV prophylaxis benefited by having a reduced inpatient cost of care due to lowered room and pharmacy costs.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of letermovir compared to valganciclovir for the prevention of human cytomegalovirus disease in adult lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplant recipients are at high risk for severe cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease. Off-label use of letermovir (LET) may avert myelotoxicity associated with valganciclovir (VGCV), but data in lung transplantation are limited. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of LET prophylaxis among lung transplant recipients. METHODS: This retrospective, matched cohort study included lung transplant recipients who received LET for primary CMV prophylaxis following VGCV intolerance. Patients were matched 1:1 to historical VGCV controls based on age, serostatus group, and time from transplant. The primary outcome was CMV breakthrough within 1 year post-LET initiation; secondary outcomes included hematologic changes. RESULTS: A total of 124 lung transplant recipients were included per group (32% CMV mismatch, D+R-), with LET initiated a median of 9.6 months post-transplantation. One CMV breakthrough event (0.8%) was observed in the LET group versus four (3.2%) in the VGCV group (p = .370). The median (interquartile range) white blood cell (WBC) count was 3.1 (2.1-5.6) at LET initiation which increased to 5.1 (3.9-7.2) at the end of follow-up (p <.001). For VGCV controls, WBC was 4.8 (3.4-7.2) at baseline and 5.4 (3.6-7.2) at the end of follow-up; this difference was not statistically significant (p = .395). Additionally, 98.4% of LET patients experienced ≥1 leukopenia episode in the year prior to LET compared to 71.8% the year after initiation (p <.001). Similar results were observed for neutropenia (48.4% and 17.7%, p <.001). CONCLUSION: LET prophylaxis was associated with a low rate of CMV reactivation and leukopenia recovery. LET may represent a reasonable prophylaxis option for lung transplant recipients unable to tolerate VGCV.

Efficacy of montelukast for adenoid hypertrophy in paediatrics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Leukotrienes play a significant role in the pathogenesis of adenoid hypertrophy (A.H.). Therefore, we aimed to analyse the role of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, alone or in combination with mometasone, a potent local intranasal steroid, for the treatment of A.H. METHODS: Participants were children with A.H. were treated with montelukast alone or montelukast and mometasone furoate. The main outcome measures were effect of montelukast on clinical symptoms of A.H. A literature review was conducted using online search engines, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus, for randomized clinical trials assessing children with A.H. treated with montelukast alone or montelukast and mometasone furoate. Seven randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included with 742 children. RESULTS: Our study reveals that montelukast alone or in combination with intranasal mometasone furoate significantly improves clinical symptoms of adenoid hypertrophy such as snoring, sleeping disturbance, mouth breathing and A/N ratio. Montelukast was superior to placebo in decreasing snoring (SMD = -1.00, 95% CI [-1.52, -0.49]), sleep discomfort (SMD = -1.26, 95% CI [-1.60, -0.93]), A/N ratio (MD = -0.11, 95% CI [-0.14, -0.09]) and mouth breathing (SMD = -1.36, 95% CI [-1.70, -1.02]). No difference was detected between montelukast and mometasone versus mometasone alone in snoring (SMD = -0.21, 95%CI [-0.69, 0.27]); however, the combination group was superior to the mometasone alone in mouth breathing (SMD = -0.46, 95% CI [-0.73, -0.19]). CONCLUSIONS: The limitation of studies included a small sample size, with an overall low to medium quality. Thus, further larger, higher-quality RCTs are recommended to provide more substantial evidence.

Clinical Characteristics, Investigations and Treatment in Children with Chronic Urticaria: An Observational Study.

Background and Objectives: The guidelines for chronic urticaria in children contain recommendations that are often based on adult studies. The diagnostic pathway has not been standardized and the effectiveness of anti-H1, omalizumab, montelukast, and systemic glucocorticoids is rarely reported in the pediatric population. There is a wide variation in the rate of remission of chronic urticaria between studies. The aim of this study is to enhance our understanding of pediatric chronic urticaria. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 37 children with chronic urticaria aged from 0 to 18 years. Demographic parameters, medical history, clinical features, laboratory data and treatment information were collected. Children were treated with the recommended dosage of second-generation H1-antihistamines, which was increased by up to twofold. Omalizumab was added for refractory anti-H1 patients. A three-day course with systemic glucocorticoids was administered for severe exacerbations. Montelukast was administered to some children. Results: Wheals without angioedema were common. Chronic urticaria was spontaneous in 32 children (86.48%), inducible in 2 (5.41%), induced by a parasite in 1 and vasculitic in 2. Treatment of the potential causes of chronic urticaria was of no benefit, except for eradication of Dientamoeba fragilis. Chronic urticaria was resolved within three years in 45.9% of cases. Allergic diseases were present in nine children (24.32%) and autoimmune diseases were present in three (8.11%). All children were treated with anti-H1 at the licensed dose or at a higher dose. A partial or complete response to anti-H1 was observed in 29 (78.38%) patients. Montelukast showed no benefit. All children treated with omalizumab responded. Systemic glucocorticoids were successfully used to treat exacerbations. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that laboratory tests should not be routinely performed in children with chronic urticaria without clinical suspicion. However, comorbidities such as thyroid autoimmune disease and coeliac disease are suggested to be monitored over the chronic urticaria course. These clinical conditions could be diagnosed from the diagnostic framework of chronic urticaria. Increasing the dosage of anti-H1 and omalizumab was effective in children resistant to standard treatment but we still need further studies to generate a standard patient-centered treatment.

Methyl jasmonate ameliorates pain-induced learning and memory impairments through regulating the expression of genes involved in neuroinflammation.

OBJECTIVE: Orofacial pain with high prevalence is one of the substantial human health issues. The importance of this matter became more apparent when it was revealed that orofacial pain, directly and indirectly, affects cognition performances. Currently, researchers have focused on investigating pharmaceutics to alleviate pain and ameliorate its subsequent cognitive impairments. DESIGN: In this study, the rats were first treated with the central administration of methyl jasmonate (MeJA), which is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory bio-compound. After 20 min, orofacial pain was induced in the rats by the injection of capsaicin in their dental pulp. Subsequently, the animals' pain behaviors were analyzed, and the effects of pain and MeJA treatments on rats learning and memory were evaluated/compared using the Morris water maze (MWM) test. In addition, the expression of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-1ß, BDNF, and COX-2 genes in the rats' hippocampus was evaluated using real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Experiencing orofacial pain resulted in a significant decline in the rats learning and memory. However, the central administration of 20 µg/rat of MeJA effectively mitigated these impairments. In the MWM, the performance of the MeJA-treated rats showed a two- to threefold improvement compared to the nontreated ones. Moreover, in the hippocampus of pain-induced rats, the expression of pro-inflammatory factors TNF-α, IL-1ß, and COX-2 significantly increased, whereas the BDNF expression decreased. In contrast, MeJA downregulated the pro-inflammatory factors and upregulated the BDNF by more than 50%. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the notable antinociceptive potential of MeJA and its ability to inhibit pain-induced learning and memory dysfunction through its anti-inflammatory effect.

Clinical efficacy of montelukast sodium combination therapy for cough variant asthma in children: A meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aims to assess the clinical effectiveness of combination therapy with montelukast sodium for the treatment of cough variant asthma (CVA) in children, intending to provide clinical evidence and data to guide the selection of clinical therapy. A literature review was conducted using numerous databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang database, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science, from inception to December 2023. Trials meeting the criteria for the combined treatment of montelukast sodium for CVA in children were included. Stata 16.0 software was utilized for meta-analysis. The combined treatment group received montelukast sodium in addition to the control group, while the control group received budesonide, fluticasone propionate, salmeterol-fluticasone, or ketotifen alone. This investigation included 18 papers. All subjects were from the Chinese population. Compared to the control group, the combined treatment group demonstrated a higher effective rate (relative ratio [RR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.29, p < .001), but no difference in the incidence of adverse reactions (RR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.42-1.02, p = .060) after treatment. Moreover, the peak expiratory flow (PEF) (SMD = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.09-2.30, p < .001), forced vital capacity (FVC) (SMD = 1.67, 95% CI: 0.94-2.39, p < .001), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (SMD = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.09-2.40, p < .001), and FEV1/FVC (SMD = 1.84, 95% CI: 0.41-3.28, p = .012) were significantly higher in the combined treatment group than in the control group after treatment. Compared with the control group, the levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (SMD = -2.38, 95% CI: -3.22 to -1.55, p < .001), IL-4 (SMD = -2.65, 95% CI: -3.26 to -2.04, p < .001), and IgE (SMD = -2.98, 95% CI: -3.24 to -2.72, p < .001) were significantly lower in the combined treatment group after treatment. The combined use of montelukast sodium in the treatment of pediatric CVA in China is associated with a significant clinical effect, making it a reasonable therapeutic approach.

A Phase 3 Trial of Seladelpar in Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatments for patients with primary biliary cholangitis are limited. Seladelpar, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta agonist, has potential benefits. METHODS: In this phase 3, 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients who had had an inadequate response to or who had a history of unacceptable side effects with ursodeoxycholic acid to receive oral seladelpar at a dose of 10 mg daily or placebo. The primary end point was a biochemical response, which was defined as an alkaline phosphatase level less than 1.67 times the upper limit of the normal range, with a decrease of 15% or more from baseline, and a normal total bilirubin level at month 12. Key secondary end points were normalization of the alkaline phosphatase level at month 12 and a change in the score on the pruritus numerical rating scale (range, 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst itch imaginable]) from baseline to month 6 among patients with a baseline score of at least 4 (indicating moderate-to-severe pruritus). RESULTS: Of the 193 patients who underwent randomization and treatment, 93.8% received ursodeoxycholic acid as standard-of-care background therapy. A greater percentage of the patients in the seladelpar group than in the placebo group had a biochemical response (61.7% vs. 20.0%; difference, 41.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.7 to 53.4, P<0.001). Normalization of the alkaline phosphatase level also occurred in a greater percentage of patients who received seladelpar than of those who received placebo (25.0% vs. 0%; difference, 25.0 percentage points; 95% CI, 18.3 to 33.2, P<0.001). Seladelpar resulted in a greater reduction in the score on the pruritus numerical rating scale than placebo (least-squares mean change from baseline, -3.2 vs. -1.7; least-squares mean difference, -1.5; 95% CI, -2.5 to -0.5, P = 0.005). Adverse events were reported in 86.7% of the patients in the seladelpar group and in 84.6% in the placebo group, and serious adverse events in 7.0% and 6.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving patients with primary biliary cholangitis, the percentage of patients who had a biochemical response and alkaline phosphatase normalization was significantly greater with seladelpar than with placebo. Seladelpar also significantly reduced pruritus among patients who had moderate-to-severe pruritus at baseline. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar in the two groups. (Funded by CymaBay Therapeutics; RESPONSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04620733; EudraCT number, 2020-004348-27.).

Letermovir para prevención de la infección por citomegalovirus en receptores de trasplante alogénico de progenitores hematopoyéticos / Letermovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in allogeneic stem cell transplant receivers

INTRODUCCIÓN: La infección por citomegalovirus (CMV) sigue siendo la infección con relevancia clínica más frecuente luego del trasplante alogénico de progenitores hematopoyéticos (TPHa), presentando alta morbilidad y mortalidad. Por este motivo, es importante implementar estrategias de prevención para reducir la frecuencia de la infección por CMV. OBJETIVO: Describir la frecuencia de infección, infección clínicamente significativa (ICS) y enfermedad por CMV en pacientes seropositivos que recibieron un TPHa y profilaxis primaria con letermovir. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo de cohorte longitudinal, en pacientes con TPHa seropositivos para CMV que recibieron profilaxis primaria con letermovir hasta el día 100 posTPH. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 25 pacientes adultos con una mediana de edad de 41 años, el 44% fue de donante no relacionado y 36% de donante haploidéntico. Ochenta por ciento tenía tres o más factores de riesgo para infección por CMV y a 52% se le estratificó como de alto riesgo para enfermedad por CMV. La profilaxis con letermovir tuvo una mediana de duración de 97 días. Durante los 100 días pos-TPH, 20% de los pacientes presentaron infección por CMV, con carga viral plasmática detectable no cuantificable, que se negativizó en el siguiente control semanal sin discontinuación del letermovir. Ningún paciente presentó ICS ni enfermedad por CMV durante este período. CONCLUSIÓN: La profilaxis con letermovir fue efectiva para prevenir la ICS y la enfermedad por CMV.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains the most common clinically significant infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (aSCT), with a high morbidity and mortality rate. In order to reduce its frequency, prevention strategies should be implemented. AIM: To describe the frequency of infection, clinically significant infection (CSI) and CMV disease in seropositive patients who received aSCT and primary prophylaxis with letermovir. METHODS: Longitudinal descriptive cohort study in seropositive patients who received aSCT and primary prophylaxis with letermovir until day 100 post-SCT. RESULTS: Twenty-five adult patients with a median age of 41 years were included; 44% were unrelated donors, and 36% were haploidentical donors. Eighty percent had three or more risk factors for CMV infection, and 52% were stratified as high risk for CMV disease. Letermovir prophylaxis had a median duration of 97 days. Twenty percent of the patients developed CMV infection through day 100 post-SCT, with detectable non-quantifiable CMV viral load in plasma. This became negative in the following weekly control without discontinuation of letermovir. No patient developed CSI or CMV organ disease during this period. CONCLUSION: Letermovir prophylaxis proved to be effective in preventing CSI and CMV disease.

Performance Evaluation of Montelukast Pediatric Formulations: Part II - a PBPK Modelling Approach.

This study aimed to build a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model coupled with age-appropriate in vitro dissolution data to describe drug performance in adults and pediatric patients. Montelukast sodium was chosen as a model drug. Two case studies were investigated: case study 1 focused on the description of formulation performance from adults to children; case study 2 focused on the description of the impact of medicine co-administration with vehicles on drug exposure in infants. The PBPK model for adults and pediatric patients was developed in Simcyp® v18.2 informed by age-appropriate in vitro dissolution results obtained in a previous study. Oral administration of montelukast was simulated with the ADAM™ model. For case study 1, the developed PBPK model accurately described montelukast exposure in adults and children populations after the administration of montelukast chewable tablets. Two-stage dissolution testing in simulated fasted gastric to intestinal conditions resulted in the best description of in vivo drug performance in adults and children. For case study 2, a good description of in vivo drug performance in infants after medicine co-administration with vehicles was achieved by incorporating in vitro drug dissolution (under simulated fasted gastric to fed intestinal conditions) into a fed state PBPK model with consideration of the in vivo dosing conditions (mixing of formulation with applesauce or formula). The case studies presented demonstrate how a PBPK absorption modelling strategy can facilitate the description of drug performance in the pediatric population to support decision-making and biopharmaceutics understanding during pediatric drug development.

Performance Evaluation of Montelukast Pediatric Formulations: Part I-Age-Related In Vitro Conditions.

This study aimed to explore the potential of biopharmaceutics in vitro tools to predict drug product performance in the pediatric population. Biorelevant dissolution set-ups were used to predict how age and medicine administration practices affect the in vitro dissolution of oral formulations of a poorly water-soluble compound, montelukast. Biorelevant age-appropriate dissolution studies of Singulair® (granules and chewable tablets) were conducted with the µDISS profiler™, USP 4 apparatus, USP 2 apparatus, and mini-paddle apparatus. Biorelevant simulating fluids representative of adult and pediatric conditions were used in the dissolution studies. The biorelevant dissolution conditions were appropriately selected (i.e. volumes, transit times, etc.) to mimic the gastrointestinal conditions of each of the subpopulations tested. Partial least squares regression (PLS-R) was performed to understand the impact of in vitro variables on the dissolution of montelukast. Montelukast dissolution was significantly affected by the in vitro hydrodynamics used to perform the dissolution tests (µDISS profiler™: positive effect); choice of simulation of gastric (negative effect) and/or intestinal conditions (positive effect) of the gastrointestinal tract; and simulation of prandial state (fasted state: negative effect, fed state: positive effect). Age-related biorelevant dissolution of Singulair® granules predicted the in vivo effect of the co-administration of the formulation with applesauce and formula in infants. This study demonstrates that age-appropriate biorelevant dissolution testing can be a valuable tool for the assessment of drug performance in the pediatric population.