Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 2.566
Filtrar
2.
Dermatol Online J ; 30(1)2024 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762855

RESUMEN

Superficial granulomatous pyoderma gangrenosum is a rare, superficial, vegetating form of pyoderma gangrenosum that tends to occur as a single lesion, most commonly on the trunk. Herein, we report a clinically confounding case of disseminated superficial granulomatous pyoderma gangrenosum in a patient with a 5-year history of painful and chronic ulcerations of the bilateral upper extremities and face in a sun exposed distribution. This was a diagnostically challenging case due to the treatment-refractory nature of our patient's skin lesions and the atypical clinical and histologic presentations encountered. We review our clinical decision process and acknowledge other entities that were considered during the clinical course of this case. Additionally, we discuss the lack of responsiveness to various treatment options with eventual successful clearance of this patient's active skin disease with initiation of adalimumab.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Piodermia Gangrenosa , Humanos , Piodermia Gangrenosa/patología , Piodermia Gangrenosa/diagnóstico , Piodermia Gangrenosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Granuloma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supuración , Dermatitis/patología , Dermatitis/diagnóstico
3.
BMJ Open ; 14(5): e078273, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692727

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Anti-Freaze-F (AFF) trial assessed the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to determine whether intra-articular injection of adalimumab can reduce pain and improve function in people with pain-predominant early-stage frozen shoulder. DESIGN: Multicentre, randomised feasibility trial, with embedded qualitative study. SETTING: Four UK National Health Service (NHS) musculoskeletal and related physiotherapy services. PARTICIPANTS: Adults ≥18 years with new episode of shoulder pain attributable to early-stage frozen shoulder. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised (centralised computer generated 1:1 allocation) to either ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of: (1) adalimumab (160 mg) or (2) placebo (saline (0.9% sodium chloride)). Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment allocation. Second injection of allocated treatment (adalimumab 80 mg) or equivalent placebo was administered 2-3 weeks later. PRIMARY FEASIBILITY OBJECTIVES: (1) Ability to screen and identify participants; (2) willingness of eligible participants to consent and be randomised; (3) practicalities of delivering the intervention; (4) SD of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) score and attrition rate at 3 months. RESULTS: Between 31 May 2022 and 7 February 2023, 156 patients were screened of whom 39 (25%) were eligible. The main reasons for ineligibility were other shoulder disorder (38.5%; n=45/117) or no longer in pain-predominant frozen shoulder (33.3%; n=39/117). Of the 39 eligible patients, nine (23.1%) consented to be randomised (adalimumab n=4; placebo n=5). The main reason patients declined was because they preferred receiving steroid injection (n=13). All participants received treatment as allocated. The mean time from randomisation to first injection was 12.3 (adalimumab) and 7.2 days (placebo). Completion rates for patient-reported and clinician-assessed outcomes were 100%. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that current NHS musculoskeletal physiotherapy settings yielded only small numbers of participants, too few to make a trial viable. This was because many patients had passed the early stage of frozen shoulder or had already formulated a preference for treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 27075727, EudraCT 2021-03509-23, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05299242 (REC 21/NE/0214).


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Bursitis , Estudios de Factibilidad , Dolor de Hombro , Humanos , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Bursitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Dolor de Hombro/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor de Hombro/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Dimensión del Dolor , Reino Unido , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(18): e38002, 2024 May 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701278

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of different biological agents (infliximab, canakinumab, baricitinib, anakinra, adalimumab, tofacitinib, tocilizumab, and rilonacept) compared with placebo for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients, through a network meta-analysis. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to July 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing different biological agents (infliximab, canakinumab, baricitinib, anakinra, adalimumab, tofacitinib, tocilizumab, and rilonacept) or placebo directly or indirectly in JIA. Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted. Data was extracted and analyzed by R with gemtc package. The treatment options were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) value. RESULTS: We identified 10 randomized controlled trials and analyzed 898 participants. Canakinumab (odds ratio 55.0, 95% credible intervals 2.4-67.0) was more effective than the placebo, and the difference was statistically significant. However, there was no statistical significance between other drugs versus placebo in terms of the modified ACRpedi30 (P > .05). The SUCRA shows that canakinumab ranked first (SUCRA, 86.9%), anakinra ranked second (SUCRA, 77.7%), adalimumab ranked third (SUCRA, 61.9%), and placebo ranked the last (SUCRA, 6.3%). Nevertheless, there were no notable discrepancies in the occurrence of adverse events, hepatic-related adverse events, infectious adverse event, serious adverse events, and serious infection following treatment with canakinumab, anakinra, tocilizumab, rilonacept, or the placebo. Based on the clustergram of modified ACRpedi30 and adverse events, canakinumab is suggested for JIA according to the surface under SUCRAs considering the symptom and adverse events simultaneously. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with JIA, canakinumab exhibited the highest likelihood of being the optimal treatment for achieving the modified ACRpedi30 response rate, and neither of the tested biological agents carried a significant risk of serious adverse events.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Juvenil , Metaanálisis en Red , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/efectos adversos , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1/uso terapéutico , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1/efectos adversos , Teorema de Bayes
5.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 252, 2024 May 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762485

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Metastatic Crohn's disease is a rare disorder characterized by various granulomatous skin lesions that occur independently of gastrointestinal tract involvement. However, currently there is no standardized care or specific treatment. Therapeutic approaches include immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids, azathioprine, and monoclonal antibodies targeting inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor (TNF). CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a 29-year-old western European woman with significant blind ending abdominal subcutaneous fistulas and abscesses, who sought evaluation in the dermatology department. Histological examination revealed multiple epithelioid cell granulomas. There was no evidence of infectious or rheumatologic diseases such as sarcoidosis. The tentative diagnosis was metastatic Crohn's disease, which was not related to an intestinal manifestation of the disease. The patient responded to infliximab but had to discontinue it due to an allergic reaction. Subsequent adalimumab treatment failed to induce clinical remission; thus, therapy was switched to ustekinumab, resulting in a positive response. Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient. For our study more than 1600 publications were screened for cases of metastatic Crohn's disease on PubMed database. 59 case reports with 171 patients were included in the analysis and evaluated for localization, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and complications and were summarized in this review. CONCLUSION: The successful ustekinumab treatment of a patient with metastatic Crohn's disease underscores the potential of this minimally investigated therapeutic option, highlighting the need for future treatment guidelines given the increasing prevalence of such cases.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Adulto , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Ustekinumab/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Fístula Cutánea/etiología , Fístula Cutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/secundario , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico
6.
J Neurol Sci ; 460: 123018, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640580

RESUMEN

Sarcoidosis is a disease characterized by non-caseating granulomas that can involve the central nervous system as neurosarcoidosis. This challenging disease is currently managed with high dose steroids, and sometimes the addition of infliximab. Other TNA-alpha inhibitors have not been studied as rigorously. We discovered ten neurosarcoidosis patients who were on an alternative TNA-alpha inhibitor, adalimumab. Eight patients had a positive response clinically and radiographically to adalimumab.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central , Sarcoidosis , Humanos , Sarcoidosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoidosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano
9.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 9(6): 521-538, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640937

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We sought to report the effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab over the first 3 years of treatment and to define the factors that predict anti-TNF treatment failure and the strategies that prevent or mitigate loss of response. METHODS: Personalised Anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease (PANTS) is a UK-wide, multicentre, prospective observational cohort study reporting the rates of effectiveness of infliximab and adalimumab in anti-TNF-naive patients with active luminal Crohn's disease aged 6 years and older. At the end of the first year, sites were invited to enrol participants still receiving study drug into the 2-year PANTS-extension study. We estimated rates of remission across the whole cohort at the end of years 1, 2, and 3 of the study using a modified survival technique with permutation testing. Multivariable regression and survival analyses were used to identify factors associated with loss of response in patients who had initially responded to anti-TNF therapy and with immunogenicity. Loss of response was defined in patients who initially responded to anti-TNF therapy at the end of induction and who subsequently developed symptomatic activity that warranted an escalation of steroid, immunomodulatory, or anti-TNF therapy, resectional surgery, or exit from study due to treatment failure. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03088449, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between March 19, 2014, and Sept 21, 2017, 389 (41%) of 955 patients treated with infliximab and 209 (32%) of 655 treated with adalimumab in the PANTS study entered the PANTS-extension study (median age 32·5 years [IQR 22·1-46·8], 307 [51%] of 598 were female, and 291 [49%] were male). The estimated proportion of patients in remission at the end of years 1, 2, and 3 were, for infliximab 40·2% (95% CI 36·7-43·7), 34·4% (29·9-39·0), and 34·7% (29·8-39·5), and for adalimumab 35·9% (95% CI 31·2-40·5), 32·9% (26·8-39·2), and 28·9% (21·9-36·3), respectively. Optimal drug concentrations at week 14 to predict remission at any later timepoints were 6·1-10·0 mg/L for infliximab and 10·1-12·0 mg/L for adalimumab. After excluding patients who had primary non-response, the estimated proportions of patients who had loss of response by years 1, 2, and 3 were, for infliximab 34·4% (95% CI 30·4-38·2), 54·5% (49·4-59·0), and 60·0% (54·1-65·2), and for adalimumab 32·1% (26·7-37·1), 47·2% (40·2-53·4), and 68·4% (50·9-79·7), respectively. In multivariable analysis, loss of response at year 2 and 3 for patients treated with infliximab and adalimumab was predicted by low anti-TNF drug concentrations at week 14 (infliximab: hazard ratio [HR] for each ten-fold increase in drug concentration 0·45 [95% CI 0·30-0·67], adalimumab: 0·39 [0·22-0·70]). For patients treated with infliximab, loss of response was also associated with female sex (vs male sex; HR 1·47 [95% CI 1·11-1·95]), obesity (vs not obese 1·62 [1·08-2·42]), baseline white cell count (1·06 [1·02-1·11) per 1 × 109 increase in cells per L), and thiopurine dose quartile. Among patients treated with adalimumab, carriage of the HLA-DQA1*05 risk variant was associated with loss of response (HR 1·95 [95% CI 1·17-3·25]). By the end of year 3, the estimated proportion of patients who developed anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations was 44·0% (95% CI 38·1-49·4) among patients treated with infliximab and 20·3% (13·8-26·2) among those treated with adalimumab. The development of anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations was significantly associated with treatment without concomitant immunomodulator use for both groups (HR for immunomodulator use: infliximab 0·40 [95% CI 0·31-0·52], adalimumab 0·42 [95% CI 0·24-0·75]), and with carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 risk variant for infliximab (HR for carriage of risk variant: infliximab 1·46 [1·13-1·88]) but not for adalimumab (HR 1·60 [0·92-2·77]). Concomitant use of an immunomodulator before or on the day of starting infliximab was associated with increased time without the development of anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations compared with use of infliximab alone (HR 2·87 [95% CI 2·20-3·74]) or introduction of an immunomodulator after anti-TNF initiation (1·70 [1·11-2·59]). In years 2 and 3, 16 (4%) of 389 patients treated with infliximab and 11 (5%) of 209 treated with adalimumab had adverse events leading to treatment withdrawal. Nine (2%) patients treated with infliximab and two (1%) of those treated with adalimumab had serious infections in years 2 and 3. INTERPRETATION: Only around a third of patients with active luminal Crohn's disease treated with an anti-TNF drug were in remission at the end of 3 years of treatment. Low drug concentrations at the end of the induction period predict loss of response by year 3 of treatment, suggesting higher drug concentrations during the first year of treatment, particularly during induction, might lead to better long-term outcomes. Anti-drug antibodies associated with undetectable drug concentrations of infliximab, but not adalimumab, can be predicted by carriage of HLA-DQA1*05 and mitigated by concomitant immunomodulator use for both drugs. FUNDING: Guts UK, Crohn's and Colitis UK, Cure Crohn's Colitis, AbbVie, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Celltrion Healthcare.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Enfermedad de Crohn , Infliximab , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Inducción de Remisión
10.
Australas J Dermatol ; 65(3): 276-279, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38623950

RESUMEN

Biologics have significantly advanced the treatment of inflammatory disorders, including psoriasis. However, their use in immunosuppressed patients, such as those with solid-organ transplants, is less understood. These patients often face dermatological issues, but inflammatory skin diseases are rare due to their immunosuppressive treatments. Our study aims to assess biologics' effectiveness in such immunocompromised patients. We report a case from our institution of a 29-year-old man with a history of psoriasis, who underwent a kidney transplant and later developed erythroderma. He did not respond to traditional treatments and was successfully treated with adalimumab, leading to the discontinuation of MMF. We also reviewed literature in solid organ transplant patients with psoriasis. Our findings, based on 10 articles, indicate a cautious approach to using biologics in this group, with further research needed for efficacy and safety.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Productos Biológicos , Trasplante de Riñón , Psoriasis , Humanos , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Adulto , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/efectos adversos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trasplantes
11.
Turk J Ophthalmol ; 54(2): 112-115, 2024 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646109

RESUMEN

In recent years, adalimumab has been increasingly used in the chronic treatment of non-infectious uveitis. This case report aimed to describe a drug-induced adverse event in a 34-year-old man who presented with blurred vision and floaters in the right eye and was being treated for intermediate uveitis. The patient had started topical treatment with a diagnosis of uveitis at another center. Best corrected visual acuity at presentation was 0.8 (decimal) in the right eye and 1.0 in the left eye. On examination, the anterior chamber in the right eye was clear, with anterior vitreous cells and mild haze, and snow banking and vitreous opacities in the inferior periphery. Fluorescein angiography (FA) showed hyperfluorescence in the right disc and leakage in the inferior periphery. As the inflammation did not resolve with local treatment, systemic cyclosporine was administered, after which the patient exhibited vomiting and weakness. Cyclosporine was discontinued and adalimumab treatment was started. On examination 5 months later, bilateral vitreous cells and mild vitreous opacity were noted, and FA showed mild leakage in the inferior periphery bilaterally. In addition, a depigmented patchy vitiligo lesion was observed on the chin. Due to the persistence of intraocular inflammation and on the recommendation of the dermatology clinic, adalimumab treatment was continued and topical tacrolimus was started for the lesion. On examination 3 months later, the inflammatory findings had resolved and there was no progression of the vitiligo lesion. The patient's treatment was continued. Taken together with the previous literature findings, no pathology was found in the patient's systemic examination, suggesting that this lesion was a side effect of the treatment. Ophthalmologists should be alert for this side effect in patients receiving adalimumab.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Antiinflamatorios , Angiografía con Fluoresceína , Vitíligo , Humanos , Adalimumab/efectos adversos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Adulto , Angiografía con Fluoresceína/métodos , Vitíligo/diagnóstico , Vitíligo/inducido químicamente , Antiinflamatorios/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios/administración & dosificación , Agudeza Visual , Fondo de Ojo
12.
RMD Open ; 10(1)2024 Mar 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479751

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis of the FINCH 1-3 (NCT02889796, NCT02873936 and NCT02886728) studies assessed specific effects of filgotinib on pain control and their relationship with other aspects of efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Assessments included: residual pain responses of ≤10 and ≤20 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS); the proportion of patients who achieved VAS pain responses in addition to remission or low disease activity by Disease Activity Score-28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) or Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) criteria. RESULTS: Across studies, filgotinib reduced pain from week 2, with responses sustained throughout the studies. In FINCH 1, at week 24, 35.8%, 25.0%, 24.6% and 11.6% of patients in the filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, adalimumab and placebo arms (each plus methotrexate) achieved VAS pain ≤20 mm in addition to DAS28-CRP remission; 26.3%, 17.9%, 17.2% and 7.6% achieved VAS pain ≤10 mm in addition to DAS28-CRP remission. A similar pattern was seen for CDAI remission. Time during which VAS pain was ≤10 or ≤20 mm was longest with filgotinib 200 mg and comparable between adalimumab and filgotinib 100 mg. Similar findings were reported for filgotinib in FINCH 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: In all RA populations studied, pain improvements occurred from week 2 and were sustained over time. In FINCH 1, filgotinib 100 mg provided similar pain amelioration to adalimumab, whereas filgotinib 200 mg resulted in greater pain improvement and higher proportion of patients with residual pain ≤10 or ≤20 mm and meeting DAS28-CRP remission criteria.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Pinzones , Piridinas , Triazoles , Humanos , Animales , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Pinzones/metabolismo , Método Doble Ciego , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología
13.
Biomolecules ; 14(3)2024 Mar 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38540800

RESUMEN

This study aims at identifying molecular biomarkers differentiating responders and non-responders to treatment with Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitors (TNFi) among patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Whole blood mRNA and plasma proteins were measured in a cohort of biologic-naïve axSpA patients (n = 35), pre and post (14 weeks) TNFi treatment with adalimumab. Differential expression analysis was used to identify the most enriched pathways and in predictive models to distinguish responses to TNFi. A treatment-associated signature suggests a reduction in inflammatory activity. We found transcripts and proteins robustly differentially expressed between baseline and week 14 in responders. C-reactive protein (CRP) and Haptoglobin (HP) proteins showed strong and early decrease in the plasma of axSpA patients, while a cluster of apolipoproteins (APOD, APOA2, APOA1) showed increased expression at week 14. Responders to TNFi treatment present higher levels of markers of innate immunity at baseline, and lower levels of adaptive immunity markers, particularly B-cells. A logistic regression model incorporating ASDAS-CRP, gender, and AFF3, the top differentially expressed gene at baseline, enabled an accurate prediction of response to adalimumab in our cohort (AUC = 0.97). In conclusion, innate and adaptive immune cell type composition at baseline may be a major contributor to response to adalimumab in axSpA patients. A model including clinical and gene expression variables should also be considered.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Espondiloartritis Axial , Espondilitis Anquilosante , Humanos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1342477, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38476237

RESUMEN

Introduction: We evaluated baseline Clearance of anti-tumor necrosis factors and human leukocyte antigen variant (HLA DQA1*05) in combination as poor prognostic factors (PPF) of pharmacokinetic (PK) origin impacting immune response (formation of antidrug antibodies) and disease control of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab. Methods: Baseline Clearance was estimated in IBD patients before starting treatment using weight and serum albumin concentrations. HLA DQA1*05 carrier status (rs2097432 A/G or G/G variant) was measured using real time polymerase chain reaction. The outcomes consisted of immune response, clinical and biochemical remission (C-reactive protein<3 mg/L in the absence of symptoms), and endoscopic remission (SES-CD<3). Statistical analysis consisted of logistic regression and nonlinear mixed effect models. Results and discussion: In 415 patients enrolled from 4 different cohorts (median age 27 [IQR: 15-43] years, 46% females), Clearance>0.326 L/day and HLA DQA1*05 carrier status were 2-fold more likely to have antidrug antibodies (OR=2.3, 95%CI: 1.7-3.4; p<0.001, and OR=1.9, 95%CI: 1.4-2.8; p<0.001, respectively). Overall, each incremental PPF of PK origin resulted in a 2-fold (OR=2.16, 95%CI: 1.7-2.7; p<0.11) [corrected] higher likelihood of antidrug antibody formation. The presence of both PPF of PK origin resulted in higher rates of antidrug antibodies (p<0.01) and lower clinical and biochemical remission (p<0.01). Each incremental increase in PPF of PK origin associated with lower likelihood of endoscopic remission (OR=0.4, 95%CI: 0.2-0.7; p<0.001). Prior biologic experience heightened the negative impact of PPF of PK origin on clinical and biochemical remission (p<0.01). Implementation of proactive therapeutic drug monitoring reduced it, particularly during maintenance and in the presence of higher drug concentrations (p<0.001). We conclude that PPF of PK origin, including both higher Clearance and carriage of HLA DQA1*05, impact outcomes in patients with IBD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Femenino , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Pronóstico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos , Necrosis/tratamiento farmacológico
15.
Australas J Dermatol ; 65(3): 272-275, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38544290

RESUMEN

Cartilage hypoplasia syndrome is a primary immunodeficiency disease characterized by short stature, hypoplastic hair and a variable degree of immunodeficiency. Noninfectious cutaneous granulomas represent an uncommon yet well-recognized manifestation within the spectrum of primary immunodeficiency diseases. However, cutaneous granulomas as a manifestation of cartilage-hair hypoplasia syndrome, are extremely rare. We present a case of a middle-aged man with cartilage hypoplasia syndrome featuring cutaneous granulomas, manifesting as chronic, extensive and deep cutaneous ulcers. The patient was treated with anti-TNF-alpha adalimumab with partial improvement. Our case underscores the broad spectrum of clinical manifestations associated with cartilage hypoplasia syndrome and adds new evidence to the potential therapeutic efficacy of anti-TNF-alpha drugs in its treatment.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Granuloma , Cabello , Osteocondrodisplasias , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria , Úlcera Cutánea , Humanos , Masculino , Cabello/anomalías , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/complicaciones , Enfermedades de Inmunodeficiencia Primaria/diagnóstico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Úlcera Cutánea/etiología , Úlcera Cutánea/tratamiento farmacológico , Granuloma/tratamiento farmacológico , Osteocondrodisplasias/complicaciones , Osteocondrodisplasias/diagnóstico , Osteocondrodisplasias/congénito , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hipotricosis/diagnóstico
16.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 30(4): e108-e114, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38509045

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, is a putative choice in the treatment of axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA). The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of tofacitinib with adalimumab, in AxSpA, in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: In this multicentric medical records review study, adult patients with active AxSpA treated with either tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily or adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously fortnightly were recruited. Effectiveness was measured with Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Drug-cost analysis was calculated with Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER drug ). RESULTS: Among the 266 patients, 135 were treated with tofacitinib and 131 with adalimumab (follow-up: 6.5 ± 1.6 months). Mean improvement of BASDAI (3.39 ± 0.09 vs. 3.14 ± 1.16, respectively) and that of ASDAS (1.78 ± 0.68 vs. 2.07 ± 2.08, respectively) were comparable between the adalimumab and tofacitinib groups. A higher proportion of patients achieved BASDAI50 response in the second (49.5% vs. 31.6%) and fourth month (83.9% vs. 62.8%) and ASDAS low disease activity in the fourth month (71.6% vs. 47.9%) in the adalimumab group. All disease activity measurements were similar by the sixth month in both groups. A higher proportion of patients in the tofacitinib group than in the adalimumab group required change in therapy (14.8% vs. 7.6%, respectively). ICER drug for adalimumab compared with tofacitinib was US $188.8 per patient in the adalimumab group for each person-month with BASDAI <4. CONCLUSIONS: Tofacitinib showed comparable effectiveness with adalimumab in patients with AxSpA at the sixth month, despite lesser response in the initial months, with favorable ICER drug .


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Antirreumáticos , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Pirroles , Humanos , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/economía , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Pirroles/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espondiloartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Espondiloartritis/diagnóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
BioDrugs ; 38(3): 331-339, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520607

RESUMEN

As of 31 December, 2023, 31 observational studies have been published, including a total of 6081 patients who underwent a switch from one biosimilar to another biosimilar of the same reference biologic. Most studies evaluated infliximab, while a smaller number evaluated adalimumab, rituximab or etanercept. Indications studied now include sarcoidosis, as well as the indications previously reported of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis/ankylosing spondylitis and inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis). This updated data set includes eight additional studies and 2386 more patients compared with those included in an earlier systematic review of biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching. In addition, since the earlier systematic review was published in 2022, the European Medicines Agency has stated that reference-to-biosimilar and biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching in the European Union is safe and efficacy remains unchanged after switching. Furthermore, following a review of the available evidence, the US Food and Drug Administration has confirmed that initial safety and immunogenicity concerns related to biosimilar switching are unfounded and that no differences are observed in efficacy, safety or immunogenicity following one or more switches. The availability of this new efficacy and safety data together with the supportive statements from the European Medicines Agency and the Food and Drug Administration re-confirm the conclusion that as a scientific matter, biosimilar-to-biosimilar switching is an effective clinical practice, with no new safety concerns. Any suggestions to the contrary are not supported by the evidence.


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , United States Food and Drug Administration
18.
Adv Ther ; 41(5): 1795-1814, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38514505

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hyrimoz®, (GP2017 [SDZ-ADL]), is a biosimilar to Humira® (REF-ADL). SDZ-ADL was approved in 2018 by both the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the indications of REF-ADL not protected by orphan exclusivity. In 2023, the US FDA and EMA also approved a citrate-free high-concentration formulation (HCF) of SDZ-ADL. TOTALITY OF EVIDENCE-THE APPROACH: Approval of SDZ-ADL was based on data gathered using the US FDA, EMA and World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended step-wise Totality of Evidence approach. This approach is a robust dataset confirming high confidence in analytical, functional, pharmacokinetic (PK) and clinical biosimilarity between the biosimilar and reference medicine determined through analytical and clinical investigation. EVIDENCE OF BIOSIMILARITY: Evidence supporting the biosimilarity of SDZ-ADL and REF-ADL was reported at each stage of investigation. Comprehensive comparative analytical and functional assessments demonstrated that SDZ-ADL was analytically indistinguishable from REF-ADL in required critical quality attributes, including receptor binding. Phase I clinical data showed PK similarity of SDZ-ADL and REF-ADL in healthy volunteers, with similar safety, tolerability and immunogenicity profiles. Phase III confirmatory efficacy and safety studies, ADACCESS (included in US/EU dossiers) and ADMYRA (separate to US/EU dossiers), both confirmed that SDZ-ADL's efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity matched REF-ADL in all patient groups with no clinically meaningful differences. More recently, this data package was the basis for a citrate-free HCF of SDZ-ADL to be developed, and its PK, safety and immunogenicity were confirmed against the initially approved formulation of SDZ-ADL. CONCLUSION: Overall, the Totality of Evidence provided for biosimilar adalimumab, SDZ-ADL, confirmed the analytical, functional and clinical similarity of SDZ-ADL to REF-ADL, supporting its regulatory approval and providing a data bridge with which to evaluate and support the approval of citrate-free HCF SDZ-ADL for clinical use.


A biosimilar is a type of medicine that is designed to match the structure and function of a 'reference' biologic medicine. Hyrimoz® (SDZ-ADL) is a biosimilar of the adalimumab reference medicine, Humira® ([REF-ADL]). SDZ-ADL was approved in the US and Europe in 2018. For SDZ-ADL to be approved, a collection of evidence needed to be created, called the 'Totality of Evidence.' The purpose of this collection of data is to show there is a high confidence that the new biosimilar medicine matches the reference medicine, from the structure of the medicine to the effect of the medicine on the human body. For SDZ-ADL, this investigation started with comparing the physical structure and other functional properties of SDZ-ADL versus REF-ADL and ended with clinical studies in both healthy volunteers and in patients with diseases treated with adalimumab. This Totality of Evidence gathered for biosimilar adalimumab, SDZ-ADL, confirmed the similarity of SDZ-ADL to REF-ADL and therefore supported the approval of SDZ-ADL. In 2018, a citrate-free high-concentration version (high concentration formulation [HCF]) of REF-ADL was launched that matched REF-ADL. HCF REF-ADL has since become the primary formulation of REF-ADL used in practice. In 2023, a HCF version of SDZ-ADL was also approved in the US and EU based on evidence confirming that HCF SDZ-ADL matched SDZ-ADL. As SDZ-ADL had been previously confirmed to match the reference medicine, this meant that HCF SDZ-ADL could be directly compared against SDZ-ADL to confirm biosimilarity and support its approval.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Aprobación de Drogas , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/farmacocinética
20.
AAPS J ; 26(2): 31, 2024 Mar 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453809

RESUMEN

The interpretation of immunogenicity results for a mAb product and prediction of its clinical consequences remain difficult, despite enormous advances in methodologies and efforts toward the best practice for consistent data generation and reporting. To this end, the contribution from the clinical pharmacology discipline has been largely limited to comparing descriptively the pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles by antidrug antibodies (ADA) status or testing the significance of ADA as a covariate in a population PK setting, similar to the practice for small-molecule drugs in investigating the effect of an intrinsic/extrinsic factor on the drug disposition. There is a need for a mAb disposition framework that captures the dynamics of ADA formation and drug's interactions with the ADA and target as parts of the drug distribution and elimination. Here we describe such a framework and examine it against the PK, ADA, and clinical response data from a phase 3 trial in patients treated with adalimumab. The proposed framework offered a generalized understanding of how the dose, target affinity, and drug/ADA analyte forms affects the manifestation of ADA response with regard to its detections and alterations of drug disposition and effectiveness. Furthermore, as an example, its utility for dose considerations was demonstrated through predicting for late-stage trials of a PCSK9 inhibitor in terms of development in ADA incidence and titers, and consequences on the drug disposition, interaction with target, and downstream lowering effect on LDL-C.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Humanos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Proproteína Convertasa 9 , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA