Submucosal cystic adenomyosis: a report of five cases and review of the literature.

AIM: To investigate the clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and clinical treatment of submucosal cystic adenomyosis. METHODS: The clinical data of five cases of patients with submucosal cystic adenomyosis in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The average age of the patients was 37.8 ± 4.5 years old, three of them experienced prolonged menstruation and heavy menstrual bleeding. All patients had a history of abnormal uterine bleeding and mild to moderate dysmenorrhea, with a VAS score of 2.8 ± 1.6. The average Carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) value was 29.9 ± 23.6U/ml. Two out of the five patients (40%) had CA125 values above the upper limit of normal. The nodules had a diameter of 3.2 ± 1.3 cm and a cavity size of 1.3 ± 0.7 cm. Color ultrasound revealed hypo or iso or anechoic echoic cysts, and blood flow signals were detected. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings varied among each patient. All the patients underwent hysteroscopy and resection of uterine cavity-occupying lesions, and no recurrence was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical features of submucosal cystic adenomyosis include abnormal uterine bleeding and menstrual changes, and the degree of dysmenorrhea is generally not severe. The diagnostic utility of CA125 in submucosal cystic adenomyosis may be limited. The three-dimensional ultrasound and MRI are valuable preoperative examination methods currently. Hysteroscopy can not only diagnose submucosal cystic adenomyosis, but also treat it, and preserve the fertility function of the patient.

A new treatment for Robert's uterus with adenomyosis: a case report and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: To provide a method for the differential diagnosis of Robert's uterus with adenomyosis, a rare uterine malformation, and determine the best course of treatment. METHODS: A patient who had Robert's uterus with adenomyosis was admitted to our hospital in December 2022. We analyzed and summarized her case . RESULTS: Our patient complained of progressively worsening primary dysmenorrhea over the course of 3 years and lower abdominal pain lasting for 2 days. Her carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) level was 372.10 U/mL. Examinations conducted by several hospitals indicated that she had a single-horned uterus and a residual horned uterus, and our hospital's examination identified Robert's uterus. This malformation was corrected by open abdominal surgery. For the procedure, pelvic adhesions were first isolated, after which the closed uterine cavity and adenomyosis were resected. Subsequently, the left ovarian endometriosis cyst was resected and right tubal ligation was performed. After surgery, three injections of gonadotropin-releasing hormone A (GnRH-A) were administered, which lowered the patient's CA125 level to 14 U/mL and normalized her condition. CONCLUSION: We pioneered a new therapeutic approach for the treatment of Robert's uterus with adenomyosis. Some valuable references are provided for clinical practice.

Adenomyosis and Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: Review of the Evidence.

BACKGROUND: Thomas Cullen described bleeding abnormalities and dysmenorrhea as the "expected" presentations of adenomyomas. Adenomyosis is included within the FIGO classification of structural causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Nevertheless, this long-standing association has been questioned by some authors who reported a high incidence of adenomyosis in uteri removed for indications other than AUB or dysmenorrhea. Here, we examine evidence for the link between adenomyosis and AUB. METHODS: A comprehensive Medline literature review of all publications to October 2023. RESULTS: Sixty-three articles were identified and included in the review. Despite a large body of studies, the available literature does not provide conclusive evidence of a link between adenomyosis and AUB. This is because of unsuitable study design, or poor characterization of the study population or of the inclusion or exclusion criteria. Additional challenges arise because of the lack of agreed criteria for diagnosing adenomyosis and the often absence of detailed assessment of menstrual blood loss. Adenomyosis often coexists with other conditions that have also been linked to similar symptoms, and many cases of adenomyosis are asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: Most of the existing literature and studies that addressed treatment outcome of adenomyosis started from the premise that a link between the condition and AUB had been proven. Yet, published information shows that aspects such a relationship is still uncertain. Further research is needed to address the relation between AUB and adenomyosis burden (or subtypes), distribution, and concomitant pathology.

Epidemiological characteristics of suspected adenomyosis in the Chinese physical examination population: a nested case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the epidemiological characteristics of suspected adenomyosis within a physical examination population in China. DESIGN: A retrospective, nested case-control study; we matched healthy people and those with potential adenomyosis on a 1:2 ratio by age. SETTING: A tertiary hospital health management centre. PARTICIPANTS: We included 15-60 years old women who underwent at least one uterine examination from October 2017 to December 2020, excluding those who had undergone hysterectomy and menopause. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We estimated the incidence and prevalence rate of suspected adenomyosis. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate associations between serum biomarkers and potential adenomyosis. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) were used to determine the cut-off point of the cancer antigen 125 (CA125) level for suspected adenomyosis. RESULTS: A total of 30 629 women had uterus-related imaging examinations; 877 had suspected adenomyosis. The standardised incidence and prevalence of suspected adenomyosis was 1.32% and 2.35%, respectively, for all age groups. The conditional logistic regression analysis results showed that total bilirubin≥18.81 µmol/L (HR: 2.129; 95% CI 1.067 to 4.249; p<0.0321) and CA125 levels (HR: 1.014; 95% CI 1.002 to 4.731; p<0.0273) were positively correlated with onset of suspected adenomyosis; body mass index>24 kg/m2 (HR: 1.262; 95% CI 1.055 to 1.511; p<0.0109), CA125 levels (HR: 1.007; 95% CI 1.006 to 1.009; p<0.0001), and blood platelet levels (HR: 1.002; 95% CI 1 to 1.003; p<0.0141) were positively correlated with potential adenomyosis. The optimal cut-off of CA125 for new suspected adenomyosis was 10.714 U/mL, with a sensitivity of 77.42%, specificity of 53.76%, and AUC of 0.7841 (95% CI 0.7276 to 0.8407). CONCLUSIONS: The disease burden of suspected adenomyosis remains huge and can be informed by biomarkers. The disease-specific threshold of CA125 will support further preventive strategy development in population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100049520, 2021/8/2.

Women's experiences of the diagnostic journey in uterine adenomyosis: a scoping review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Uterine adenomyosis is a benign gynaecological disease that causes physical and psychological problems, impacting on relationships. It is poorly understood and consequently may be diagnosed late. This protocol describes the process of conducting a systematic scoping review to retrieve and describe literature examining the daily experience and impact of living with uterine adenomyosis. It will explore the journey to diagnosis (and perceptions of what this process is like); identify the main concepts currently used in the literature and highlight gaps in knowledge for future research in relevant populations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, the population-concept-context approach is used to form clear review questions. A three-phase search strategy will locate published and unpublished evidence from multiple sources. All articles reporting on the personal experiences of women diagnosed with uterine adenomyosis will be considered. Findings from qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method study designs from all settings will be included, not limited by geography but restricted to English. Documents will be screened by the primary researcher, supported by university supervisors. Search outputs will be presented using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 flow diagram. No formal quality appraisal will be conducted. Review findings will be descriptively collated and reported consistent with the Scoping Review Extension of the PRISMA checklist. Patient and public involvement engagement reflected a positive response for the project that this protocol supports. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As primary data will not be collected, formal ethical approval is not required. Prepared as part of a professional doctorate thesis, the findings of this study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, support groups and social media networks.

Multicenter evaluation of blood-based biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis and adenomyosis: A prospective non-interventional study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate blood-based biomarkers to detect endometriosis and/or adenomyosis across nine European centers (June 2014-April 2018). METHODS: This prospective, non-interventional study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of 54 blood-based biomarker immunoassays in samples from 919 women (aged 18-45 years) with suspicion of endometriosis and/or adenomyosis versus symptomatic controls. Endometriosis was stratified by revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine stage. Symptomatic controls were "pathologic symptomatic controls" or "pathology-free symptomatic controls". The main outcome measure was receiver operating characteristic-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) and Wilcoxon P values corrected for multiple testing (q values). RESULTS: CA-125 performed best in "all endometriosis cases" versus "all symptomatic controls" (AUC 0.645, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.600-0.690, q < 0.001) and increased (P < 0.001) with disease stage. In "all endometriosis cases" versus "pathology-free symptomatic controls", S100-A12 performed best (AUC 0.692, 95% CI 0.614-0.769, q = 0.001) followed by CA-125 (AUC 0.649, 95% CI 0.569-0.729, q = 0.021). In "adenomyosis only cases" versus "symptomatic controls" or "pathology-free symptomatic controls", respectively, the top-performing biomarkers were sFRP-4 (AUC 0.615, 95% CI 0.551-0.678, q = 0.045) and S100-A12 (AUC 0.701, 95% CI 0.611-0.792, q = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This study concluded that no biomarkers tested could diagnose or rule out endometriosis/adenomyosis with high certainty.

[Epidemiological and anatomopathological profile of endometriosis in Dakar: retrospective study over a period of 20 years]. / Aspects épidémiologique et anatomopathologique des endométrioses à Dakar : étude rétrospective sur une période de 20 ans.

INTRODUCTION: Endometriosis is a gynecological pathology defined by the presence and abnormal development of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. Our objective was to draw up an epidemiological profile and to describe the anatomical clinical forms of endometriosis in Dakar. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of all cases of external and internal endometriosis diagnosed in an anatomy and pathology laboratory in Dakar over a period of twenty (20) years. The study parameters were collected from anonymous data sheets. Data entry and analysis were performed using version 22 of the EPI INFO and SPSS software. RESULTS: Our study involved 104 female patients. The mean age was 47.3±10.0. Among the patients with an adenomyosis condition, the mean age was 49.8 years. Patients with an external endometriosis condition had a mean age of 37.6 years. The location of the endometriosis was statistically correlated with the age of patients and with parity. Anatomically and pathologically, the surgical specimen 89.4% (n=93) was the main type of sampling that was found. The uterine body was the main location of the pathology, with 78.9% (n=82), followed by the umbilical location with 9.6% (n=10). Leiomyomas 44.07% (n=26) were the main associated lesions. CONCLUSION: Endometriosis is a gynecological pathology that is unfortunately not well known, and which is under diagnosed in Senegal.

Proposal for targeted, neo-evolutionary-oriented secondary prevention of early-onset endometriosis and adenomyosis. Part II: medical interventions.

According to consistent epidemiological data, the slope of the incidence curve of endometriosis rises rapidly and sharply around the age of 25 years. The delay in diagnosis is generally reported to be between 5 and 8 years in adult women, but it appears to be over 10 years in adolescents. If this is true, the actual onset of endometriosis in many young women would be chronologically placed in the early postmenarchal years. Ovulation and menstruation are inflammatory events that, when occurring repeatedly for years, may theoretically favour the early development of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Moreover, repeated acute dysmenorrhoea episodes after menarche may not only be an indicator of ensuing endometriosis or adenomyosis, but may also promote the transition from acute to chronic pelvic pain through central sensitization mechanisms, as well as the onset of chronic overlapping pain conditions. Therefore, secondary prevention aimed at reducing suffering, limiting lesion progression, and preserving future reproductive potential should be focused on the age group that could benefit most from the intervention, i.e. severely symptomatic adolescents. Early-onset endometriosis and adenomyosis should be promptly suspected even when physical and ultrasound findings are negative, and long-term ovulatory suppression may be established until conception seeking. As nowadays this could mean using hormonal therapies for several years, drug safety evaluation is crucial. In adolescents without recognized major contraindications to oestrogens, the use of very low-dose combined oral contraceptives is associated with a marginal increase in the individual absolute risk of thromboembolic events. Oral contraceptives containing oestradiol instead of ethinyl oestradiol may further limit such risk. Oral, subcutaneous, and intramuscular progestogens do not increase the thromboembolic risk, but may interfere with attainment of peak bone mass in young women. Levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine devices may be a safe alternative for adolescents, as amenorrhoea is frequently induced without suppression of the ovarian activity. With regard to oncological risk, the net effect of long-term oestrogen-progestogen combinations use is a small reduction in overall cancer risk. Whether surgery should be considered the first-line approach in young women with chronic pelvic pain symptoms seems questionable. Especially when large endometriomas or infiltrating lesions are not detected at pelvic imaging, laparoscopy should be reserved to adolescents who refuse hormonal treatments or in whom first-line medications are not effective, not tolerated, or contraindicated. Diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, including self-reported outcome measures, for young individuals with a clinical suspicion of early-onset endometriosis or adenomyosis are proposed.

Outcome prediction for symptomatic patients with fibroids who underwent uterine artery embolization.

PURPOSE: To predict the clinical outcome of symptomatic patients with uterine leiomyomas who underwent uterine artery embolization (UAE), based on clinical and radiological features. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas who underwent UAE from March 2010 to September 2019 were consecutively included in this retrospective study. Patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms and those who needed repeated UAE, myomectomy, or hysterectomy following the initial treatment were considered to have a poor outcome after UAE. The total and enhancing volume of the dominant leiomyoma in each location and uterine volume were obtained before and after UAE. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to evaluate the parameters that could predict poor outcome. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (mean age, 45 ± 5 years) were included. Forty-six patients (46/116, 39.7%) showed poor outcome. Cox regression analysis showed higher hazard of poor outcome for younger patients vs. older patients (HR: 0.92, p-value: 0.01), patients with adenomyosis vs. patients without adenomyosis (HR: 2.47, p-value < 0.01), patients with adenomyosis thickness > 2.5 cm before UAE vs. patients without adenomyosis (HR: 4.2, p-value < 0.01) and for patients with intramural fibroid enhancement volume > 440 cm3 compared to patients with no intramural fibroids (p-value: 0.06). Multivariate Cox regression analysis including age, the thickness of adenomyosis, and intramural leiomyoma volume of enhancement before UAE was chosen as the best model to predict the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment clinical and MRI features could identify patients with a higher risk for poor outcome after UAE.

Endometriosis and adenomyosis: Similarities and differences.

Deep endometriosis and uterine adenomyosis are two frequently encountered conditions affecting approximately 200 million women worldwide. They are closely related, showing similar histological patterns and multiple common pathogenic features, and share the same symptoms. It is therefore not surprising that they are often thought to have a common developmental origin. Indeed, both deep endometriosis and adenomyosis appear to derive from estrogen-dependent overproliferation of endometrial tissue and its subsequent implantation in ectopic sites. Although the scientific community has shown increasing interest in these diseases over recent years, neither pathogenesis has yet been elucidated, so there are currently no efficient treatment options. Understanding the mechanisms underlying disease development, as well as discerning their relationship, are key to improving clinical management for millions of patients. The aims of this review are to summarize current knowledge on deep endometriosis and adenomyosis pathogeneses and discuss the possibility that these two entities are actually differential phenotypes of the same disease.