Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Med Imaging ; 21(1): 59, 2021 03 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33757455

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine whether in-laboratory specimen radiography reduces turnaround time or block utilization in surgical pathology. METHODS: Specimens processed during a 48-day trial of an in-lab cabinet radiography device (Faxitron) were compared to a control group of specimens imaged in the mammography suite during a prior 1-year period, and to a second group of specimens not undergoing imaging of any type. RESULTS: Cases imaged in the mammography suite had longer turnaround time than cases not requiring imaging (by 1.15 days for core biopsies, and 1.73 days for mastectomies; p < 0.0001). In contrast, cases imaged in-lab had turnaround time that was no longer than unimaged cases (p > 0.05 for core biopsies, lumpectomies and mastectomies). Mastectomies imaged in-lab required submission of fewer blocks than controls not undergoing any imaging (mean reduction of 10.6 blocks). CONCLUSIONS: Availability of in-lab radiography resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in turnaround time and economically meaningful reductions in block utilization.


Asunto(s)
Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Laboratorios Clínicos , Mamografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Patología Quirúrgica/métodos , Manejo de Especímenes/métodos , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/estadística & datos numéricos , Mama/patología , Mama/cirugía , Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcinosis/patología , Femenino , Marcadores Fiduciales , Humanos , Laboratorios Clínicos/economía , Mastectomía Radical Modificada/estadística & datos numéricos , Mastectomía Segmentaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Mastectomía Simple/estadística & datos numéricos , Patología Quirúrgica/economía , Patología Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Patología Quirúrgica/organización & administración , Manejo de Especímenes/economía , Manejo de Especímenes/instrumentación , Manejo de Especímenes/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Adhesión del Tejido/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
Mil Med ; 185(Suppl 1): 423-429, 2020 01 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32074337

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to quantify the extent of donor-cell-derived myogenesis achieved by a novel surgical technique known as Minimally Invasive Muscle Embedding (MIME). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through MIME, we implanted a single extensor digitorum longus muscle from donor mice (N = 2) that expressed a red fluorescent protein (RFP), into the left tibialis anterior (TA) muscle of immunodeficient host mice (N = 4) that expressed a green fluorescent protein (GFP). Soon after MIME, we injected a myotoxin (barium chloride), into the host TA muscle, to trigger concerted muscle degeneration and regeneration. In lieu of MIME, we performed a SHAM procedure on the right TA muscle of the same set of animals. RESULTS: In MIME-treated muscles, 22% ± 7% and 78% ± 7% muscle fibers were RFP+ and GFP+, respectively (mean ± standard deviation); and all RFP+ fibers were positive for desmin and dystrophin. Conclusion. We conclude that MIME helps generate muscle fibers of donor origin, in host muscle.


Asunto(s)
Desmina/análisis , Distrofina/análisis , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/trasplante , Adhesión del Tejido/métodos , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Ratones , Ratones SCID , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Adhesión del Tejido/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 133(1): 26-30, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19123732

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The size of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a significant predictor of local tumor recurrence and is used for selection of patients for conservative versus aggressive therapy. A standardized method for size assessment is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 2 commonly used methods for measurement of DCIS extent: one based on the distribution of the lesion in sequential series of sections (mapping method) and the other on the number of sections with DCIS (block method). DESIGN: Ninety-eight consecutive cases of DCIS, measuring at least 1.0 cm, were retrieved from our files. All specimens were serially sectioned along the long axis. The size of DCIS was calculated for each case by 2 different methods: (1) mapping method (average thickness of each slice x number of consecutive slices with DCIS) and (2) block method (number of blocks with DCIS x 0.3 cm). Additional calculations were performed by using 0.35, 0.4, and 0.5 cm as multiplication factors for the block method in order to improve concordance. RESULTS: The block method underestimated the size in 71 cases (72%) by 4.5% to 81.3% (mean, 33%). Using 0.4 cm as the multiplication factor improved concordance, while multiplying by 0.5 cm led to an overestimation of size. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of DCIS size by the block method is inaccurate and underestimates size in most cases (72%), with an average reduction of 33%. Using 0.4 cm as the multiplication factor improves concordance. A standardized method for size estimation is necessary for effective patient management.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/patología , Microtomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Patología Quirúrgica/métodos , Adhesión del Tejido/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Microtomía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Patología Quirúrgica/normas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sociedades Médicas , Adhesión del Tejido/métodos , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...