Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for progressive multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In recent years a broader range of immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive treatment options have emerged for people with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (PMS). While consensus supports these options as reducing relapses, their relative benefit and safety profiles remain unclear due to a lack of direct comparison trials. OBJECTIVES: To compare through network meta-analysis the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab, azathioprine, cladribine, cyclophosphamide, daclizumab, dimethylfumarate, diroximel fumarate, fingolimod, fludarabine, glatiramer acetate, immunoglobulins, interferon beta 1-a and beta 1-b, interferon beta-1b (Betaferon), interferon beta-1a (Avonex, Rebif), laquinimod, leflunomide, methotrexate, minocycline, mitoxantrone, mycophenolate mofetil, natalizumab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, ozanimod, pegylated interferon beta-1a, ponesimod, rituximab, siponimod, corticosteroids, and teriflunomide for PMS. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase up to August 2022, as well as ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that studied one or more treatments as monotherapy, compared to placebo or to another active agent, for use in adults with PMS. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently selected studies and extracted data. We performed data synthesis by pair-wise and network meta-analysis. We assessed the certainty of the body of evidence according to GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 23 studies involving a total of 10,167 participants. The most frequent (39% of studies) reason for a rating of high risk of bias was sponsor role in study authorship and data management and analysis. Other concerns were performance, attrition, and selective reporting bias, with 8.7% of studies at high risk of bias for all three of these domains. The common comparator for network analysis was placebo. Relapses over 12 months: assessed in one study (318 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Relapses over 24 months: assessed in six studies (1622 participants). The number of people with clinical relapses is probably trivially reduced with rituximab (risk ratio (RR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 1.95; moderate certainty evidence). None of the remaining treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Relapses over 36 months: assessed in four studies (2095 participants). The number of people with clinical relapses is probably trivially reduced with interferon beta-1b (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.93; moderate certainty evidence). None of the remaining treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Disability worsening over 24 months: assessed in 11 studies (5284 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Disability worsening over 36 months: assessed in five studies (2827 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Serious adverse events: assessed in 15 studies (8019 participants). None of the treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. Discontinuation due to adverse events: assessed in 21 studies (9981 participants). The number of people who discontinued treatment due to adverse events is trivially increased with interferon beta-1a (odds ratio (OR) 2.93, 95% CI 1.64 to 5.26; high certainty evidence). The number of people who discontinued treatment due to adverse events is probably trivially increased with rituximab (OR 4.00, 95% CI 0.84 to 19.12; moderate certainty evidence); interferon beta-1b (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.92 to 4.61; moderate certainty evidence); immunoglobulins (OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.99 to 3.84; moderate certainty evidence); glatiramer acetate (OR 3.98, 95% CI 1.48 to 10.72; moderate certainty evidence); natalizumab (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.90; moderate certainty evidence); siponimod (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.38; moderate certainty evidence); fingolimod (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.46 to 3.60; moderate certainty evidence), and ocrelizumab (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.86; moderate certainty evidence). None of the remaining treatments assessed showed moderate or high certainty evidence compared to placebo. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The number of people with PMS with relapses is probably slightly reduced with rituximab at two years, and interferon beta-1b at three years, compared to placebo. Both drugs are also probably associated with a slightly higher proportion of withdrawals due to adverse events, as are immunoglobulins, glatiramer acetate, natalizumab, fingolimod, siponimod, and ocrelizumab; we have high confidence that this is the case with interferon beta-1a. We found only low or very low certainty evidence relating to disability progression for the included disease-modifying treatments compared to placebo, largely due to imprecision. We are also uncertain about the effect of interventions on serious adverse events, also because of imprecision. These findings are due in part to the short follow-up of the included RCTs, which lacked detection of less common severe adverse events. Moreover, the funding source of many included studies may have introduced bias into the results. Future research on PMS should include head-to-head rather than placebo-controlled trials, with a longer follow-up of at least three years. Given the relative rarity of PMS, controlled, non-randomised studies on large samples may usefully integrate data from pivotal RCTs. Outcomes valuable and meaningful to people with PMS should be consistently adopted and measured to permit the evaluation of relative effectiveness among treatments.

Insights on Nefecon®, a Targeted-Release Formulation of Budesonide and Its Selective Immunomodulatory Effects in Patients with IgA Nephropathy.

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is a chronic, immune-mediated kidney disease characterized by the deposition of galactose-deficient immunoglobulin A1 (Gd-IgA1) in the kidneys. Excess Gd-IgA1 production in patients with IgAN is located within the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, particularly within the lamina propria in the distal ileum. Nefecon® is a targeted-release formulation of the corticosteroid budesonide, which became the first treatment approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA; brand name, TARPEYO®) and European Medicines Agency (EMA; KINPEYGO®) for patients with primary IgAN at risk of rapid disease progression, after demonstrating clinically significant reduction of proteinuria in an interim analysis of the Phase III NefIgArd trial. After showing a significant reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate decline in the full 2-year analysis of the trial, Nefecon was granted full approval by the FDA to reduce the loss of kidney function. Nefecon was specifically designed to deliver budesonide to the distal ileum, selectively targeting excess Gd-IgA1 production in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue. In this review, we describe the properties of Nefecon and the evidence to date that confirms its localized treatment effect. We also present unpublished evidence from Phase I trials investigating the pharmacokinetics and cortisol suppression effects of Nefecon in healthy participants. These studies demonstrated that Nefecon has a distinct pharmacokinetic profile from other budesonide products, allowing for targeted, localized action in the distal ileum. When considered alongside existing clinical trial data showing the effect of Nefecon on gut-associated biomarkers, available evidence indicates that Nefecon has a selective immunomodulatory mechanism of action and a direct disease-modifying effect in patients with IgAN, while having low systemic exposure and adverse effects.

Drug delivery strategies for local immunomodulation in transplantation: Bridging the translational gap.

Drug delivery strategies for local immunomodulation hold tremendous promise compared to current clinical gold-standard systemic immunosuppression as they could improve the benefit to risk ratio of life-saving or life-enhancing transplants. Such strategies have facilitated prolonged graft survival in animal models at lower drug doses while minimizing off-target effects. Despite the promising outcomes in preclinical animal studies, progression of these strategies to clinical trials has faced challenges. A comprehensive understanding of the translational barriers is a critical first step towards clinical validation of effective immunomodulatory drug delivery protocols proven for safety and tolerability in pre-clinical animal models. This review overviews the current state-of-the-art in local immunomodulatory strategies for transplantation and outlines the key challenges hindering their clinical translation.

Immunomodulation as a treatment for parkinson's disease in current trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Immunomodulatory drugs and immunotherapies are being evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of neuroinflammation, as the latter is an essential mechanism for the development and progression of Parkinson's disease. Objective: The objective of the study is to review recent evidence on the evaluation of immunomodulators in randomized controlled clinical trials measuring improvement of motor symptoms. Methods: A meta-analysis of Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS III) scores extracted from seven articles selected after an online search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clarivate's Web of Science for randomized controlled clinical trials published between 2000 and July 2023 was performed. The selected articles reported clinical trials evaluating the effects of specific immunomodulators or treatments with known effects on the immune system and inflammation. MDS-UPDRS III scores were reported in these studies, and the results of the placebo groups were compared with those of the treatment groups. Results: A total of 590 patients treated with immunomodulators and 622 patients treated with placebo were included. A test for heterogeneity yielded an I2 value > 50%. The mean standard difference for change in MDS-UPDR III score was -0.46 (CI [95%] = -0.90 - -0.02, p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in the change in mean MDS-UPDR III score between the treatment and placebo groups; however, two studies showed a trend toward separation from the mean. Conclusion: The immunomodulatory treatments included in this study showed no efficacy in improving motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease patients. Further clinical trials with larger patient populations are needed.

Clinical impacts of immunomodulator withdrawal from anti-tumor necrosis factor combination therapy in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVES: Combination therapy consists of both anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and an immunomodulator (IMM) and has been shown to improve outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study assesses the impacts of IMM withdrawal from combination therapy to anti-TNF monotherapy in children with IBD. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included children with IBD initiated on combination therapy between 2014 and 2019 who discontinued the IMM. We evaluated whether IMM withdrawal impacts laboratory values and disease activity. Linear mixed effects models with random intercepts were used to compare differences between groups. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for comparisons between patients who did and did not require subsequent escalation of therapy. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-two patients discontinued the IMM which did not significantly affect disease activity. However, 18% of patients escalated therapy after IMM withdrawal, primarily due to low anti-TNF levels. Lower anti-TNF and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels before IMM withdrawal were associated with subsequent escalation of therapy. Overall, there was no statistically significant effect on anti-TNF drug levels. Patients with Crohn's disease (CD) on infliximab (IFX) and methotrexate (MTX) who discontinued the IMM had an increase in mean ESR and CRP (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IMM withdrawal from anti-TNF combination therapy may be considered safe in the setting of higher anti-TNF levels and normal serum inflammatory markers. Clinicians should consider assessing anti-TNF levels and inflammatory markers after IMM withdrawal, especially in patients with CD receiving IFX who discontinued MTX.

Optimal Practices in the Delivery of Aesthetic Medical Care to Patients on Immunosuppressants and Immunomodulators: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Nonsurgical aesthetic procedures have been steadily growing in popularity among patients of all ages and ethnicities. At present, the literature remains devoid of guidelines on optimal practices in the delivery of aesthetic medical care to patients on immunosuppressant medications. The authors of this review sought to determine the physiologic responses of immunocompromised patients related to outcomes and potential complications following nonsurgical aesthetic procedures, and to suggest recommendations for optimal management of these patients. A comprehensive systematic review of the literature was performed to identify clinical studies of patients who had undergone nonsurgical aesthetic procedures while immunosuppressed. Forty-three articles reporting on 1690 immunosuppressed patients who underwent filler injection were evaluated, of which the majority (99%; 1682/1690) were HIV patients, while the remaining 8 were medically immunosuppressed. The complication rate of filler in this population was 28% (481/1690), with subcutaneous nodules the most frequently reported adverse event. A detailed synthesis of complications and a review of the inflammatory responses and impact of immunosuppressants and HIV infection on filler complications is presented. The authors concluded that patients on immunomodulatory medications may be at increased risk of filler granuloma relative to the general population, while patients on immunosuppressants may be at increased risk of infectious complications. Rudimentary guidelines for optimal preprocedural patient assessment, aseptic technique, injection technique, and antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis are reviewed. Ongoing advancements in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying these inflammatory processes will undoubtedly optimize management in this patient population.

Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Update.

Importance: There are multiple approved systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis. Lebrikizumab is a newly licensed biologic medication that has been compared to placebo in clinical trials but not to other systemic treatments. Objective: To compare reported measures of efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab to other systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data Sources: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database, the Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, and trial registries were searched from inception through November 3, 2023. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials evaluating 8 or more weeks of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were abstracted in duplicate and random-effects bayesian network meta-analyses were performed. Minimal important differences were used to define important differences between medications. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). The updated analysis was completed from December 13, 2023, to February 20, 2024. Main Outcome Measures: Efficacy outcomes were the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scales (PP-NRS) and were compared using mean difference (MD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Safety outcomes were serious adverse events and withdrawal due to adverse events. Other outcomes included the proportion of participants with 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in EASI (EASI-50, -75, -90) and the proportion with success on the Investigator Global Assessment compared using odds ratios with 95% CrI. Results: The study sample included 97 eligible trials, with a total of 24 679 patients. Lebrikizumab was associated with no important difference in change in EASI (MD, -2.0; 95% CrI, -4.5 to 0.3; moderate certainty), POEM (MD, -1.1; 95% CrI -2.5 to 0.2; moderate certainty), DLQI (MD, -0.2; 95% CrI -2.1 to 1.6; moderate certainty), or PP-NRS (MD, 0.1; 95% CrI -0.4, 0.6; high certainty) compared to dupilumab among adults with atopic dermatitis who were treated for up to 16 weeks. Dupilumab was associated with higher odds of efficacy in binary outcomes compared with lebrikizumab. The relative efficacy of other approved systemic medications was similar to that found by previous updates of this living study, with high-dose upadacitinib and abrocitinib demonstrating numerically highest relative efficacy. For safety outcomes, low event rates limited useful comparisons. Conclusions and Relevance: In this living systematic review and network meta-analysis, lebrikizumab was similarly effective to dupilumab for the short-term treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults. Clinicians and patients can use these comparative data to inform treatment decisions.

Immunomodulator adherence in multiple myeloma patients with lower socioeconomic status: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: Poor adherence to oral chemotherapy adversely impacts clinical outcomes and escalates overall healthcare costs. Despite barriers to medication adherence, a significant gap remains in assessing adherence to oral chemotherapy among multiple myeloma (MM) patients with lower socioeconomic status. Hence, our study aims to evaluate immunomodulator adherence in MM patients at a county hospital, primarily serving underrepresented and indigent individuals with low socioeconomic status across the greater Houston area. METHODS: Inclusion criteria composed of patients diagnosed with MM, aged at least 18 years, and treated with lenalidomide or pomalidomide-two widely used immunomodulators-for a minimum of 2 months or having two or more records of dispensation between May 2019 and May 2021. Adherence was gauged using an adjusted version of the medication possession ratio (MPR). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled, yielding a mean MPR value of 88% (SD, ± 18.9). Of these, 43 patients (69.3%) demonstrated adherence with an MPR of ≥ 0.90. A significant difference was found in treatment duration between the adherent (mean 8.8 months; SD, ± 7.2) and non-adherent (mean 13.4 months; SD, ± 7.9) groups (p = 0.027). Notably, race/ethnicity demonstrated a significant difference (p = 0.048), driven by disparities in African American and Hispanic representation across adherence levels. CONCLUSION: In summary, our findings highlight race and treatment duration to be predictors of immunomodulator adherence among MM patients with lower socioeconomic status. Further research is imperative to devise and test innovative interventions aimed at enhancing medication adherence, thereby contributing to improved survival and healthcare quality in this population.

Injectable butyrate-prodrug micelles induce long-acting immune modulation and prevent autoimmune arthritis in mice.

Short chain fatty acid (SCFAs), such as butyrate, have shown promising therapeutic potential due to their immunomodulatory effects, particularly in maintaining immune homeostasis. However, the clinical application of SCFAs is limited by the need for frequent and high oral dosages. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by aberrant activation of peripheral T cells and myeloid cells. In this study, we aimed to deliver butyrate directly to the lymphatics using a polymeric micelle-based butyrate prodrug to induce long-lasting immunomodulatory effects. Notably, negatively charged micelles (Neg-ButM) demonstrated superior efficacy in targeting the lymphatics following subcutaneous (s.c.) administration and were retained in the draining lymph nodes, spleen, and liver for over one month. In the collagen antibody-induced arthritis (CAIA) mouse model of RA, only two s.c. injections of Neg-ButM successfully prevented disease onset and promoted tolerogenic phenotypes in T cells and myeloid cells, both locally and systemically. These results underscore the potential of this strategy in managing inflammatory autoimmune diseases by directly modulating immune responses via lymphatic delivery.

Multi-functional nanomedicines for combinational cancer immunotherapy that transform cold tumors to hot tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Currently, cancer immunotherapy is widely used as a groundbreaking method that can completely cure advanced cancers. However, this new immunotherapy has the challenge of low patient response, which is often due to many patients' tumors having an immunosuppressive environment, known as cold tumors. AREAS COVERED: This review aims to introduce various nanomedicine-derived combinational cancer immunotherapy that can transform cold tumor into hot tumors. Initially, we discuss new technologies for combinational immunotherapy based on multifunctional nanomedicines that can deliver combinational immunogenic cell death (ICD) inducers, immune checkpoint blockades (ICBs) and immune modulators (IMs) to targeted tumor tissues at the same time. Ultimately, we highlight how multifunctional nanomedicines for combinational cancer immunotherapy can be used to transform cold tumor into hot tumors against advanced cancers. EXPERT OPINION: Nanomedicine-derived combinational cancer immunotherapy for delivering multiple ICD inducers, ICBs, and IMs at the same time is recognized as a new potential technology that can activate tumor immunity and simultaneously increase the therapeutic efficacy of immune cells that can transform effectively the cold tumors into hot tumors. Finally, nanomedicine-derived combinational cancer immunotherapy can solve the serious problems of low therapeutic efficacy that occurs when treating single drug or simple combinational drugs in cancer immunotherapy.

[Evaluation of the effectiveness of various regimens of the immunomodulatory drug Superlimf in the prevention of relapses of chronic abacterial prostatitis].

INTRODUCTION: Immune defense mechanisms, including a decrease in the functional activity of monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, as well as a violation of the balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, are important in the development of chronic abacterial prostatitis (CAP). The discovery of the cytokine system and the determination of their biological role in the development and functioning of the immune system and in the pathogenesis of a wide range of human diseases led to the development of a new direction in immunotherapy - cytokine therapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of various regimens of the use of the immunomodulatory drug Superlimf in the prevention of recurrence of CAP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 90 patients with category IIIa CAP (NIH, 1995). All patients underwent basic complex therapy was performed, which included behavioral therapy, taking an 1-adrenoblocker, an antibacterial drug from the fluoroquinolone group for 28 days, as well as the drug Superlimph 10 ME 1 suppository rectally 2 times a day for 20 days. Dynamic follow-up was recommended for patients of group (CG) in the next 12 months. In the main group 1 (MG1), patients underwent basic complex therapy, after which a preventive courses of Superlimph 10 ME 1 suppository 1 time per day for 10 days every three months for 12 months was prescribed. In the main group 2 (MG2), patients also underwent basic complex therapy, after which a preventive courses of Superlimph 10 ME of 1 suppository was prescribed 2 times a day for 10 days every three months for 12 months. The effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated after 4 weeks (visit 2). Long-term treatment results were assessed after 3 months (visit 3), 6 months (visit 4), and 12 months (visit 5). RESULTS: The study groups were homogeneous, and the results of examinations obtained before treatment did not differ statistically significantly (p>0.05). At visit 2, 4 weeks after the start of therapy, a statistically significant positive dynamics of the studied indicators in the main groups and CG was recorded. Thus, the average score on the IPSS scale decreased by 56.4% from the initial value, on the Qol scale - by 57.7%, on the NIH-CPSI scale - 70.2%. The number of leukocytes in the prostate secretion decreased to the normal level to 7.9 in the field of vision, which is 86.2% less than the initial value. The average Qmax value also increased to a normal value of 15.2ml/s, which is 51.3% higher than the initial value (p<0.001). In this study, for the first time, a comparative analysis of two different regimens of preventive administration of the drug Superlimf was carried out. In MG1, the drug was prescribed to patients at a dose of 10 ME 1 time a day, in MG2 - 10 ME 2 times a day. The data obtained indicate a comparable effectiveness of both dosage regimens after 3 months of therapy. However, after 6 months and 12 months, the results in MG2 were statistically significantly better than in MG1. In addition, during 12 months of therapy, the number of relapses in MG2 was 2.3 times less. According to ultrasound examination, the volume of the prostate gland in CG, after a significant (p<0.001) decrease against the background of basic complex therapy, increased by 24.6% from visit 2 to visit 5, whereas in MG2 the average value of this indicator did not significantly change. And according to the Doppler study, by the end of the observation period at visit 5, hemodynamic parameters in CG were statistically significantly worse than in MG1 and MG2. CONCLUSION: Thus, the use of Superlymph in patients with CAP as a preventive therapy every 3 months results to a longer preservation of the therapeutic effect and improved hemodynamics in the prostate. In addition, preventive courses of Superlymph 10 units 2 times a day for 10 days led to an increase in the duration of the relapse-free period and a decrease in the number of recurrences within 12 months by 7 times, while preventive courses of Superlymph 10 units 1 time per day for 10 days decreased risk of recurrence by 3 times. According to our results, the most effective preventive scheme in patients with CAP is the use of Superlymph 10 units, 1 suppository 2 times a day for 10 days every 3 months.

A practical guide to combination advanced therapy in inflammatory bowel disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview of the current literature regarding the use of advanced combination therapy (ACT) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although the treatment of IBD has come a long way, many patients do not respond or will lose response to currently available treatments over time. ACT has been proposed as a model to create sustained remission in difficult-to-treat IBD patient populations. This review discusses the available literature supporting the use of ACT, followed by practical tips for applying this model of treatment to clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS: Both observational and controlled evidence have demonstrated that there may be an increased benefit of ACT in specific IBD patient populations compared to advanced targeted immunomodulator (TIM) monotherapy. Additional data is required to understand how to best use combination TIMs and the long-term risks associated with this strategy. SUMMARY: While the literature has demonstrated the potential for benefit in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, the use of ACT is currently off-label and long-term controlled data is needed. The successful application of ACT requires careful consideration of both patient and disease profiles as well as close monitoring of treatment response and adverse events.

Effects of different immunomodulating liposome-based adjuvants and injection sites on immunogenicity in pigs.

Vaccine adjuvants, such as liposome-based cationic adjuvant formulations (CAFs), are able to boost immune responses and, by incorporation of distinct immunomodulators, steer immunity towards a desired direction in mice, non-human primates and humans, while less studied in pigs. Here we used commercial pigs to investigate polarizing adjuvant effects of CAFs with immunomodulators: C-type lectin receptor ligands trehalose-6,6'-dibehenate and monomycolyl glycerol, toll-like receptor 3 ligand Poly(I:C) or retinoic acid. Vaccines were formulated with a recombinant Chlamydia model protein antigen and administered via three injection routes. All adjuvants significantly increased antigen-specific IgG in serum, compared to non-adjuvanted antigen. Administering the vaccines through intramuscular and intraperitoneal routes induced significantly higher antigen-specific IgG and IgA serum antibodies, than the perirectal route. Although immunizations triggered cell-mediated immunity, no significant differences between adjuvants or injection sites were detected. Genes depicting T cell subtypes revealed only minor differences. Our findings suggest that specific signatures of the tested adjuvant immunomodulation do not translate well from mice to pigs in standard two-dose immunizations. This study provides new insights into immune responses to CAFs in pigs, and highlights that adjuvant development should ideally be carried out in the intended species of interest or in models with high predictive validity/translational value.

Immunomodulatory potential of rapamycin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles: pore size-dependent drug loading, release, and in vitro cellular responses.

Rapamycin is a potent immunosuppressive drug that has been recently proposed for a wide range of applications beyond its current clinical use. For some of these proposed applications, encapsulation in nanoparticles is key to ensure therapeutic efficacy and safety. In this work, we evaluate the effect of pore size on mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSN) as rapamycin nanocarriers. The successful preparation of MSN with 4 different pore sizes was confirmed by dynamic light scattering, zeta potential, transmission electron microscopy and N2 adsorption. In these materials, rapamycin loading was pore size-dependent, with smaller pore MSN exhibiting greater loading capacity. Release studies showed sustained drug release from all MSN types, with larger pore MSN presenting faster release kinetics. In vitro experiments using the murine dendritic cell (DC) line model DC2.4 showed that pore size influenced the biological performance of MSN. MSN with smaller pore sizes presented larger nanoparticle uptake by DC2.4 cells, but were also associated with slightly larger cytotoxicity. Further evaluation of DC2.4 cells incubated with rapamycin-loaded MSN also demonstrated a significant effect of MSN pore size on their immunological response. Notably, the combination of rapamycin-loaded MSN with an inflammatory stimulus (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) led to changes in the expression of DC activation markers (CD40 and CD83) and in the production of the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α compared to LPS-treated DC without nanoparticles. Smaller-pored MSN induced more substantial reductions in CD40 expression while eliciting increased CD83 expression, indicating potential immunomodulatory effects. These findings highlight the critical role of MSN pore size in modulating rapamycin loading, release kinetics, cellular uptake, and subsequent immunomodulatory responses.

Applications of topical immunomodulators enhance clinical signs of vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) and atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC): a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: This meta-analysis aimed to review the safety and efficacy of topical cyclosporine A (CsA) and topical tacrolimus in allergic eye disease. METHODS: A systematic search identified thirteen studies and a total of 445 patients for inclusion, making this the largest meta-analysis published on the subject. The current review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). RESULTS: Thirteen randomized control trials were included in the meta-analysis. Eleven studies used CsA as the treatment, and two used Tacrolimus. In total, 445 participants were included, of whom 76.6% were male. The mean age of participants across the included studies was 14 years. All studies reported clinical signs as evaluated by an examining clinician. Signs were usually assessed by anatomical region, with the most common regions being the conjunctiva and the cornea, and the most common signs assessed were hyperemia and papillae. Three studies accounted for more than 50% of the meta-analysis's weight. Effect size (d) ranged from - 2.37 to - 0.03, negative values favoring immunomodulators. Fixed Effect Meta-Analysis returned an SMD of - 0.81 (95% CI [- 0.98, - 0.65]). However, there was significant heterogeneity (I2 = 61%, Qw = 30.76) in the outcome measure (P = 0.0021); therefore, a random-effect meta-analysis was also completed in which the pooled SMD was - 0.98 (95% CI [- 1.26, - 0.69], τ2 = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: This study affirms the current scientific community's stance that immunomodulators effectively treat clinical signs, including blepharitis, conjunctival hyperemia, edema, papillae, and corneal damage in severe ocular allergic disease.

Osteomielitis crónica no bacteriana: a propósito del caso de una adolescente / Chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis: clinical case study of an adolescent / Osteomielite crônica não bacteriana: relato de caso de um adolescente

Introducción: la osteomielitis crónica no bacteriana (CNO) es una enfermedad autoinflamatoria ósea y se manifiesta con un amplio espectro clínico, presentándose con afectación monofocal o multifocal. Dado que no es siempre multifocal o recurrente, o ambas, fue propuesto que CNO se utilice como un término que comprenda a todas las presentaciones y la osteomielitis multifocal crónica recurrente (CRMO) se utilice para formas recurrentes y multifocales. Objetivo: presentar un caso clínico inédito, de baja prevalencia a nivel mundial, en una adolescente portadora de una enfermedad autoinflamatoria ósea que planteó desafíos diagnósticos y terapéuticos. Descripción: adolescente, mujer, 11 años, previamente sana que se presentó con dorso-lumbalgia invalidante de un mes de evolución, sin otra sintomatología asociada. Tras varias consultas en emergencia, ingresa a planta de internación pediátrica del Hospital Central de las Fuerzas Armadas (HCFFAA) en octubre de 2021. Resonancia nuclear magnética (RNM) de columna evidencia foco de edema óseo en cuerpo de T11, hemograma normal; VES 48 mm/h, ANA, anti-DNA, FR y HLA B27 negativos. Resultados: luego de descartar procesos infecciosos, oncohematológicos y una vez obtenido el resultado de una biopsia por punción ósea que evidenciaba elementos inflamatorios, se llegó al diagnóstico de CNO en el mes de febrero de 2022, tiempo récord comparando este caso con la literatura internacional. El diagnóstico de esta entidad clínica promedio a nivel mundial es de 12 meses.

Introduction: chronic Non-Bacterial Osteomyelitis (CNO) is an autoinflammatory bone disease that presents a broad clinical spectrum with monofocal or multifocal involvement. Since it is not always multifocal and/or recurrent, it was proposed that CNO be used as a term that encompasses all presentations and Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis (CRMO) for recurrent and multifocal forms. Objective: to present an unprecedented low prevalence clinical case of an adolescent carrier of an autoinflammatory bone disease that posed diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Description: a previously healthy female adolescent, 11 years old presented disabling lower back pain for a month without other associated symptoms. After several emergency consultations, she was admitted to the pediatric hospitalization at the Armed Forces Hospital (HCFFAA) in October 2021. A spine MRI showed a T11 body bone edema focus, normal blood count; ESR 48 mm/h, ANA, Anti DNA, RF and negative HLA B27. Results: after ruling out infectious and oncohematological processes, and once the result of a bone puncture biopsy was obtained, which showed inflammatory elements, an ONC diagnosis was made in February 2022, a record time comparing this case with the international literature. The average diagnosis of this clinical condition worldwide is 12 months.

Introdução: a Osteomielite Crônica Não Bacteriana (CNO) é uma doença óssea autoinflamatória, manifestando-se com amplo espectro clínico, apresentando-se com acometimento monofocal ou multifocal. Como nem sempre é multifocal e/ou recorrente, foi proposto que CNO seja usado como um termo que engloba todas as apresentações e Osteomielite Multifocal Recorrente Crônica (OMC) e que seja usado para formas recorrentes e multifocais. Objetivo: apresentar um caso clínico inédito, de baixa prevalência mundial, no caso de uma adolescente portadora de uma doença óssea autoinflamatória que representou desafios diagnósticos e terapêuticos. Descrição: adolescente do sexo feminino, 11 anos, previamente saudável, apresentava há um mês dorso-lombalgia incapacitante sem outros sintomas associados. Após várias consultas de urgência, foi internada na enfermaria pediátrica do Hospital Central das Forças Armadas (HCFFAA) em outubro de 2021. RM da coluna mostra foco de edema ósseo no corpo de T11, hemograma normal; ESR 48 mm/h, ANA, Anti DNA, RF e HLA B27 negativos. Resultados: após a exclusão de processos infecciosos e onco-hematológicos e obtido o resultado de uma biópsia por punção óssea, que evidenciou elementos inflamatórios, o diagnóstico de CNO foi feito em fevereiro de 2022, tempo recorde comparando este caso com a literatura internacional. A média de diagnóstico dessa entidade clínica no mundo é de 12 meses.

Discontinuation of disease-modifying therapy in MS patients over 60 years old and its impact on relapse rate and disease progression.

BACKGROUND / AIMS: The benefit of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) is unclear for older patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), namely those who have not experienced clinical disease activity for a prolonged time. We aimed to compare baseline differences and clinical outcomes between DMT discontinuers and continuers in a cohort of MS patients older than 60 years. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study identifying MS patients aged over 60 years, stable on DMT> 24 months. Additional inclusion criteria were a previous diagnosis of relapsing MS and a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. Differences between groups (continuers/discontinuers) were assessed. For risk of relapse and of confirmed disability worsening at follow up, a time to outcome survival model was constructed using Cox proportional hazards regression, testing for possible risk predictors. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were included (68.6% female), with a mean age at diagnosis of 42.1 ( ± 9.5) years and a median EDSS score of 3 (IQR 2) at the age of 60 years (baseline). Thirteen patients discontinued DMT after baseline, in a mean follow-up time of 77.1 months ( ± 40.2). No differences were found between DMT continuers vs discontinuers. DMT discontinuation did not predict risk to relapse (HR 0.38, 95%CI 0.04-3.80, p = 0.408) or disability worsening at follow-up (HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.31-2.22, p = 0.712). MRI gadolinium-enhancing lesions and EDSS score > 3 at baseline were found to be independent predictors of risk to relapse and disability worsening at follow-up, respectively. CONCLUSION: DMT discontinuation did not seem to influence clinical outcome, equating with the perceived limited effect of continued immunomodulation on older stable and/or progressive patients.

The vital role of animal, marine, and microbial natural products against COVID-19.

CONTEXT: Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, researchers have been working on finding ways to prevent viral entry and pathogenesis. Drug development from naturally-sourced pharmacological constituents may be a fruitful approach to COVID-19 therapy. OBJECTIVE: Most of the published literature has focussed on medicinal plants, while less attention has been given to biodiverse sources such as animal, marine, and microbial products. This review focuses on highlighting natural products and their derivatives that have been evaluated for antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory properties. METHODS: We searched electronic databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct and Springer Link to gather raw data from publications up to March 2021, using terms such as 'natural products', marine, micro-organism, and animal, COVID-19. We extracted a number of documented clinical trials of products that were tested in silico, in vitro, and in vivo which paid specific attention to chemical profiles and mechanisms of action. RESULTS: Various classes of flavonoids, 2 polyphenols, peptides and tannins were found, which exhibit inhibitory properties against viral and host proteins, including 3CLpro, PLpro, S, hACE2, and NF-κB, many of which are in different phases of clinical trials. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The synergistic effects of logical combinations with different mechanisms of action emphasizes their value in COVID19 management, such as iota carrageenan nasal spray, ermectin oral drops, omega-3 supplementation, and a quadruple treatment of zinc, quercetin, bromelain, and vitamin C. Though in vivo efficacy of these compounds has yet to be established, these bioproducts are potentially useful in counteracting the effects of SARS-CoV-2.

Impact of intravesical instillation of a novel biological response modifier (P-MAPA) on progress of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer treatment in a rat model.

This work describes the effects of immunotherapy with Protein Aggregate Magnesium-Ammonium Phospholinoleate-Palmitoleate Anhydride in the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in an animal model. NMIBC was induced by treating female Fischer 344 rats with N-methyl-N-nitrosourea. After treatment with MNU, the rats were distributed into four experimental groups: Control (without MNU) group, MNU (cancer) group, MNU-BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guerin) group, and MNU-P-MAPA group. P-MAPA intravesical treatment was more effective in histopathological recovery from cancer state in relation to BCG treatment. Western blot assays showed an increase in the protein levels of c-Myc, COUP-TFII, and wild-type p53 in P-MAPA-treated rats in relation to BCG-treated rats. In addition, rats treated with P-MAPA intravesical immunotherapy showed the highest BAX protein levels and the lowest proliferation/apoptotic ratio in relation to BCG-treated rats, pointing out a preponderance of apoptosis. P-MAPA intravesical treatment increased the wild-type p53 levels and enhanced c-Myc/COUP-TFII-induced apoptosis mediated by p53. These alterations were fundamental for histopathological recovery from cancer and for suppress abnormal cell proliferation. This action of P-MAPA on apoptotic pathways may represent a new strategy for treating NMIBC.

Immune interventions in COVID-19: a matter of time?

As the COVID-19 pandemic is still ongoing, and considering the lack of efficacy of antiviral strategies to this date, and the reactive hyperinflammation leading to tissue lesions and pneumonia, effective treatments targeting the dysregulated immune response are more than ever required. Immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive drugs have been repurposed in severe COVID-19 with contrasting results. The heterogeneity in the timing of treatments administrations could be accountable for these discrepancies. Indeed, many studies included patients at different timepoints of infection, potentially hiding the beneficial effects of a time-adapted intervention. We aim to review the available data on the kinetics of the immune response in beta-coronaviruses infections, from animal models and longitudinal human studies, and propose a four-step model of severe COVID-19 timeline. Then, we discuss the results of the clinical trials of immune interventions with regards to the timing of administration, and finally suggest a time frame in order to delineate the best timepoint for each treatment.