Pharmacokinetic variability of CFTR modulators from standard and alternative regimens.

Elexacaftor, tezacaftor, ivacaftor (ETI) is a CFTR modulator combination approved for use in ∼90 % of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) over 2 years old. While most pwCF tolerate this therapy well, some are intolerant to standard dosing, and others show little response. Clinical providers may adjust ETI dosing to combat these issues, but these adjustments are not well guided by pharmacokinetic evidence. Our post-approval study aimed to describe pharmacokinetic variability of ETI plasma concentrations in 15 participants who were administered a standard or reduced dose. ETI were quantified by LC-MS/MS in plasma samples taken prior to the morning dose. Results showed non-significant differences for each compound regardless of dosing regimen and after dose equivalence normalization. The majority of participants in both dosing groups had concentrations expected to elicit clinical response to ETI therapy. These findings indicate that dose reduction may be a viable strategy to maintain clinical benefit while managing intolerance.

Safety and efficacy of ivacaftor in infants aged 1 to less than 4 months with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor (IVA) has been shown to be safe and efficacious in children aged ≥4 months with cystic fibrosis (CF) and CFTR gating variants. We evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of IVA in a small cohort of infants aged 1 to <4 months with CF. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label study, infants 1 to <4 months with CF and an IVA-responsive CFTR variant received an initial low dose of IVA based on age and weight. Because IVA is a sensitive CYP3A substrate and CYP3A maturation is uncertain in infants, doses were adjusted at day 15 to better match median adult exposures based on individual PK measurements taken on day 4. Primary endpoints were safety and PK measurements. RESULTS: Seven infants (residual function CFTR variants [n=5]; minimal function CFTR variants [n=2]) received ≥1 dose of IVA. Six infants had doses adjusted at day 15 and one infant did not require dose adjustment; subsequent PK analyses showed mean trough concentrations for IVA and metabolites were within range of prior clinical experience. Four infants (57.1%) had adverse events (AEs); no serious AEs were noted. One infant discontinued study drug due to a non-serious AE of elevated alanine aminotransferase >8x the upper limit of normal. Mean sweat chloride concentration decreased (-40.3 mmol/L [SD: 29.2]) through week 24. Improvements in biomarkers of pancreatic function and intestinal inflammation, as well as growth parameters, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, open-label study, IVA dosing in infants achieved exposures previously shown to be safe and efficacious. Because PK was predictable, a dosing regimen based on age and weight is proposed. IVA was generally safe and well tolerated, and led to improvements in CFTR function, markers of pancreatic function and intestinal inflammation, and growth parameters, supporting use in infants as young as 1 month of age.

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor improves chronic rhinosinusitis detected by magnetic resonance imaging in children with cystic fibrosis on long-term therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated early onset and progression of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) from infancy to school age, and response to lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA) therapy in children with cystic fibrosis (CF). However, the effect of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) on CRS detected by MRI in children with CF and at least one F508del mutation, and potential incremental effects of ELX/TEZ/IVA compared to LUM/IVA in F508del homozygous children have not been studied. METHODS: 30 children with CF with at least one F508del mutation underwent three longitudinal paranasal sinus MRI before (MRI1), without (n = 16) or with LUM/IVA therapy (n = 14, MRI2), and with ELX/TEZ/IVA therapy (MRI3, mean age at therapy initiation 11.1 ± 3.4y, range 6-16y). MRI were evaluated using the CRS-MRI score. RESULTS: After therapy initiation with ELX/TEZ/IVA, the prevalence and in maxillary and sphenoid sinuses the dominance of mucopyoceles decreased (35% vs. 0 %, p<0.001 and 26% vs. 8 %, p < 0.05, respectively). This leads to a reduction in mucopyocele subscore (-3.4 ± 1.9, p < 0.001), and sinus subscores in MRI3 (maxillary sinus: -5.3 ± 3.1, p < 0.001, frontal sinus: -1.0 ± 1.9, p < 0.01, sphenoid subscore: -2.8 ± 3.5, p < 0.001, ethmoid sinus: -1.7 ± 1.9, p < 0.001). The CRS-MRI sum score decreased after therapy initiation with ELX/TEZ/IVA by -9.6 ± 5.5 score points (p < 0.001). The strength in reduction of mucopyoceles subscore and CRS-MRI sum score was independent of a pretreatment with LUM/IVA from MRI1-MRI2 (p = 0.275-0.999). CONCLUSIONS: ELX/TEZ/IVA therapy leads to improvement of CRS in eligible children with CF. Our data support the role of MRI for comprehensive monitoring of CRS disease severity and response to therapy in children with CF.

Drug exposure to infants born to mothers taking Elexacaftor, Tezacaftor, and Ivacaftor.

Elexacaftor, tezacaftor, ivacaftor (ETI) have been associated with marked clinical improvements in adults with CF, which appears to be associated with increased fertility. However, maternal and fetal effects of therapy continued during pregnancy are not well understood. We collected maternal blood, infant blood, cord blood, and breast milk from 3 mother-infant pairs from women who elected to remain on ETI therapy while pregnant. Our results demonstrated relatively high levels of ETI in cord blood, suggesting placental transfer of these compounds, as well as low levels of ETI in breast milk and infant blood, suggesting further transfer of these compounds to breast-fed infants in the postnatal period. These data underscore the need for larger studies on the effects of modulator surrounding reproduction.

Effectiveness of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor Therapy in Three Subjects with the Cystic Fibrosis Genotype Phe508del/Unknown and Advanced Lung Disease.

We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) in three subjects carrying the Phe508del/unknown CFTR genotype. An ex vivo analysis on nasal epithelial cells (NEC) indicated a significant improvement of CFTR gating activity after the treatment. Three patients were enrolled in an ELX/TEZ/IVA managed-access program, including subjects with the highest percent predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in the 1st second (ppFEV1) < 40 in the preceding 3 months. Data were collected at baseline and after 8, 12 and 24 weeks of follow-up during treatment. All patients showed a considerable decrease of sweat chloride (i.e., meanly about 60 mmol/L as compared to baseline), relevant improvement of ppFEV1 (i.e., >8) and six-minute walk test, and an increase in body mass index after the first 8 weeks of treatment. No pulmonary exacerbations occurred during the 24 weeks of treatment and all domains of the CF Questionnaire-Revised improved. No safety concerns related to the treatment occurred. This study demonstrates the benefit from the ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment in patients with CF with the Phe508del and one unidentified CFTR variant. The preliminary ex vivo analysis of the drug response on NEC helps to predict the in vivo therapeutic endpoints.

Breast development in a 7 year old girl with CF treated with ivacaftor: An indication for personalized dosing?

Substantial progress has been made in the treatment of Cystic fibrosis due to introduction of CFTR modulators. However, little is known about the long term side effects of treatment with these drugs. We here present a 7 year old girl with CF who presented with breast development as a rare dose dependent side effect of treatment with ivacaftor and we report data on the correlation between drug plasma concentration and clinical effect, bodyweight, and BSA in 16 patients. Higher plasma concentrations did not correlate with clinical effect, as change in FEV1 and sweat chloride concentration. Patients with low bodyweight or BSA tended to have higher plasma concentrations. This might indicate that the current recommended dose of ivacaftor is at the top of the dose-response curve and that some patients can be treated with lower doses of ivacaftor with similar clinical effect.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between ivacaftor and cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors in people with cystic fibrosis and healthy controls.

BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor is currently the only CFTR potentiator approved and is increasingly used since the development of CFTR correctors. Ivacaftor is metabolized by CYP3A4 and therefore dose reduction is required when treating patients on ivacaftor with CYP3A4 inhibiting drugs. As this advice is based on studies in healthy volunteers and not in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, we need to investigate this in both groups to be able to extrapolate these data to CF. METHODS: A cohort of CF patients and healthy subjects were exposed to a single dose of ivacaftor in combination with a strong (ritonavir), moderate (clarithromycin) and mild (azithromycin) CYP3A4 inhibitor. Ivacaftor concentrations were measured in all blood samples in order to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters for ivacaftor. RESULTS: We found that exposure to ivacaftor was higher in healthy volunteers than in subjects with CF. However this difference was not statistically significant. No differences were observed in the interaction potential of CYP3A4 inhibitors between both study groups. The strong CYP3A4 inhibitor ritonavir, increased exposure to ivacaftor 7 times. CONCLUSION: Our data support current recommendations for dose adjustment of ivacaftor in case of co-treatment with CYP3A4 inhibitors in people with CF. However, exposure to ivacaftor was higher in healthy subjects than in CF patients. Further study is needed to investigate the cause and implication of this difference.

Ex vivo model predicted in vivo efficacy of CFTR modulator therapy in a child with rare genotype.

BACKGROUND: New drugs that target the basic defect in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients may now be used in a large number of patients carrying responsive mutations. Nevertheless, further research is needed to extend the benefit of these treatments to patients with rare mutations that are still uncharacterized in vitro and that are not included in clinical trials. For this purpose, ex vivo models are necessary to preliminary assessing the effect of CFTR modulators in these cases. METHOD: We report the clinical effectiveness of lumacaftor/ivacaftor therapy prescribed to a CF child with a rare genetic profile (p.Phe508del/p.Gly970Asp) after testing the drug on nasal epithelial cells. We observed a significant drop of the sweat chloride value, as of the lung clearance index. A longer follow-up period is needed to define the effects of therapy on pancreatic status, although an increase of the fecal elastase values was found. CONCLUSION: Drug response obtained on nasal epithelial cells correlates with changes in vivo therapeutic endpoints and can be a predictor of clinical efficacy of novel drugs especially in pediatric patients.

Entering the era of highly effective modulator therapies.

Since the discovery of the gene responsible for cystic fibrosis (CF) in 1989, hopes have been pinned on a future with novel therapies tackling the basis of the disease rather than its symptoms. These have become a reality over the last decade with the development through to the clinic of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators. These are oral drugs which improve CFTR protein function through either increasing the time the channel pore is open (potentiators) or facilitating its trafficking through the cell to its location on the cell membrane (correctors). The first potentiator, ivacaftor, is now licensed and available clinically in many parts of the world. It is highly effective with impressive clinical impact in the lungs and gastrointestinal tract; longer-term data from patient registries show fewer exacerbations, a slower rate of lung function loss and reduced need for transplantation in patients receiving ivacaftor. However, as a single drug, it is suitable for only a small minority of patients. The commonest CFTR mutation, F508del, requires both correction and potentiation for clinical efficacy. Two dual-agent drugs (lumacaftor/ivacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor) have progressed through to licensing, although their short term impact is more modest than that of ivacaftor; this is likely due to only partial correction of protein misfolding and trafficking. Most recently, triple compounds have been developed: two different corrector molecules (elexacaftor and tezacaftor) which, by addressing different regions in the misfolded F508del protein, more effectively improve trafficking. In addition to large improvements in clinical outcomes in people with two copies of F508del, the combination is sufficiently effective that it works in patients with only one copy of F508del and a second, nonmodulator responsive mutation. For the first time, we thus have a drug suitable for around 85% of people with CF. Even more gains are likely to be possible when these drugs can be used in younger children, although more sensitive outcome measures are needed for this age group. Special consideration is needed for people with very rare mutations; those with nonmodulatable mutation combinations will likely require gene or messenger RNA-based therapeutic approaches, many of which are being explored. Although this progress is hugely to be celebrated, we still have more work to do. The international collaboration between trials networks, pharma, patient organizations, registries, and people with CF is something we are all rightly proud of, but innovative trial design and implementation will be needed if we are to continue to build on this progress and further develop drugs for people with CF.

A phase 3, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tezacaftor in combination with ivacaftor in participants 6 through 11 years of age with cystic fibrosis homozygous for F508del or heterozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation and a residual function mutation.

BACKGROUND: The CFTR modulator tezacaftor/ivacaftor was efficacious and generally safe and well tolerated in Phase 3 studies in participants ≥12 years of age with cystic fibrosis (CF) homozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation or heterozygous with a residual function-CFTR mutation (F/F or F/RF respectively). We evaluated tezacaftor/ivacaftor's efficacy and safety over 8 weeks in participants 6 through 11 years of age with these mutations. METHODS: Participants were randomized 4:1 to tezacaftor/ivacaftor or a blinding group (placebo for F/F, ivacaftor for F/RF). The primary endpoint was within-group change from baseline in the lung clearance index 2·5 (LCI2·5) through Week 8. Secondary endpoints were change from baseline in sweat chloride (SwCl), cystic fibrosis questionnaire-revised (CFQ-R) respiratory domain score, and safety. RESULTS: Sixty-seven participants received at least one study drug dose. Of those, 54 received tezacaftor/ivacaftor (F/F, 42; F/RF, 12), 10 placebo, and 3 ivacaftor; 66 completed the study. The within-group change in LCI2·5 was significantly reduced (improved) by -0·51 (95% CI: -0·74, -0·29). SwCl concentration decreased (improved) by -12·3 mmol/L and CFQ-R respiratory domain score increased (improved, nonsignificantly) by 2·3 points. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) or AEs leading to tezacaftor/ivacaftor discontinuation or interruption. The most common AEs (≥10%) in participants receiving tezacaftor/ivacaftor were cough, headache, and productive cough. CONCLUSIONS: Tezacaftor/ivacaftor improved lung function (assessed using LCI) and CFTR function (measured by SwCl concentration) in participants 6 through 11 years of age with F/F or F/RF genotypes. Tezacaftor/ivacaftor was safe and well tolerated; no new safety concerns were identified.

A 48-Year-Old Woman With Chronic Cough, Dyspnea, and Bronchiectasis.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 48-year-old woman sought a second opinion for dyspnea and chronic productive cough; she was a never smoker. Mild respiratory symptoms persisted since childhood and had progressively worsened over the previous decade. In addition, an unintentional 30-pound weight loss had occurred over several years. Six years previously, a diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis was made following right upper lobe wedge resection that revealed chronic bronchiolitis with interstitial pneumonia and non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation. Subsequent use of prednisone elicited mild intermittent improvement. She had used feather pillows in the past without any other significant exposures. There were no reports of sinus or GI symptoms.

From Ivacaftor to Triple Combination: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety of CFTR Modulators in People with Cystic Fibrosis.

Over the last years CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator) modulators have shown the ability to improve relevant clinical outcomes in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). This review aims at a systematic research of the current evidence on efficacy and tolerability of CFTR modulators for different genetic subsets of patients with CF. Two investigators independently performed the search on PubMed and included phase 2 and 3 clinical trials published in the study period 1 January 2005-31 January 2020. A final pool of 23 papers was included in the systematic review for a total of 4219 patients. For each paper data of interest were extracted and reported in table. In terms of lung function, patients who had the most beneficial effects from CFTR modulation were those patients with one gating mutation receiving IVA (ivacaftor) and patients with p.Phe508del mutation, both homozygous and heterozygous, receiving ELX/TEZ/IVA (elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor) had the most relevant beneficial effects in term of lung function, pulmonary exacerbation decrease, and symptom improvement. CFTR modulators showed an overall favorable safety profile. Next steps should aim to systematize our comprehension of scientific data of efficacy and safety coming from real life observational studies.

Inhalable nano into micro dry powders for ivacaftor delivery: The role of mannitol and cysteamine as mucus-active agents.

In this paper the innovative approach of nano into micro dry powders (NiM) was applied to incorporate into mannitol or mannitol/cysteamine micromatrices ivacaftor-loaded nanoparticles for pulmonary delivery in CF. Nanoparticles composed by a mixture of two polyhydrohydroxyethtylaspartamide copolymers containing loaded with ivacaftor at 15.5% w/w were produced. The nanoparticles were incorporated into microparticles to obtain NiM that were fully characterized in terms of size, morphology, interactions with artificial Cf mucus (CF-AM) as well as for aerodynamic behaviour. Finally the activity of ivacaftor-containing NiM was evaluated by in vitro preliminary experiments. NiM at matrix composed by a mixture of mannitol:cysteamine showed greater ability to reduce CF-AM viscosity whereas that based on just mannitol showed better aerodynamic properties with a FPF of about 25%. All produced NiM showed very good cytocompatibility and the released ivacaftor was able to restore the chroride transport in vitro.

Clinical effect of lumacaftor/ivacaftor in F508del homozygous CF patients with FEV1 ≥ 90% predicted at baseline.

OBJECTIVE: The first available CFTR modulator combination for homozygous F508del patients, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, has not been tested in patients with percentage predicted (pp)FEV1 > 90 in the phase III trials. The objective of this study is to share real life experience about treatment results in this group. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, patients aged 6 years or older starting on lumacaftor/ivacaftor in standard care were in strict follow up. For these patients, data were obtained about FEV1, BMI, CFQ-R and sweat chloride before start and after 6 months of treatment, and data about FEV1 and BMI were recorded every 3 months. Exacerbations were recorded continuously. RESULTS: We identified 40 patients with a ppFEV1 ≥ 90 at the start of lumacaftor/ivacaftor who had been in follow up for at least 12 months. After 12 months, ppFEV1 was unchanged, whereas mean absolute change in BMI was +0.88 (p = 0.001) with a mean change in SDS for BMI of +0.26 (p = 0.014). Mean CFQ-R overall score at 6 months improved by 2.6% (p = 0.004) and mean decrease in sweat chloride was -27.3 mEq/L (p = 0.000). Exacerbation rate declined from 1.03 to 0.53/person/year (p = 0.003). One patient discontinued treatment in the first 12 months because of progression of CFRLD, two paused treatment but resumed later. CONCLUSION: Homozygous F508del patients starting lumacaftor/ivacaftor at ppFEV1 ≥ 90 improved significantly in nutritional status, sweat chloride levels and exacerbation rate, but did not respond in ppFEV1. Treatment is well tolerated in this patient group. These effects make it worth considering to treat this group of patients with lumacaftor/ivacaftor.

GLPG2737 in lumacaftor/ivacaftor-treated CF subjects homozygous for the F508del mutation: A randomized phase 2A trial (PELICAN).

BACKGROUND: Triple combinations of cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators demonstrate enhanced clinical efficacy in CF patients with F508del mutation, compared with modest effects of dual combinations. GLPG2737 was developed as a novel corrector for triple combination therapy. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study evaluated GLPG2737 in F508del homozygous subjects who had been receiving lumacaftor 400mg/ivacaftor 250mg for ≥12weeks. The primary outcome was change from baseline in sweat chloride concentration. Other outcomes included assessment of pulmonary function, respiratory symptoms, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Between November 2017 and April 2018, 22 subjects were enrolled and randomized to oral GLPG2737 (75mg; n=14) or placebo (n=8) capsules twice daily for 28days. A significant decrease from baseline in mean sweat chloride concentration occurred at day 28 for GLPG2737 versus placebo (least-squares-mean difference-19.6mmol/L [95% confidence interval (CI) -36.0, -3.2], p=.0210). The absolute improvement, as assessed by least-squares-mean difference in change from baseline, in forced expiratory volume in 1s (percent predicted) at day 28 for GLPG2737 versus placebo was 3.4% (95% CI -0.5, 7.3). Respiratory symptoms in both groups remained stable. Mild/moderate adverse events occurred in 10 (71.4%) and 8 (100%) subjects receiving GLPG2737 and placebo, respectively. Lower exposures of GLPG2737 (and active metabolite M4) were observed than would be expected if administered alone (as lumacaftor induces CYP3A4). Lumacaftor and ivacaftor exposures were as expected. CONCLUSIONS: GLPG2737 was well tolerated and yielded significant decreases in sweat chloride concentration versus placebo in subjects homozygous for F508del receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor, demonstrating evidence of increased CFTR activity when added to a potentiator-corrector combination. FUNDING: Galapagos NV. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03474042.

Lumacaftor/ivacaftor reduces exacerbations in adults homozygous for Phe508del mutation with severe lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA) improves outcomes in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients homozygous for Phe508del with ppFEV1 > 40%. There is limited safety or efficacy data in patients with ppFEV1 < 40%. We determined whether LUM/IVA in patients with ppFEV1 < 40 would reduce the rate of pulmonary exacerbations. METHODS: This was a case control study performed on patients > 12 years, homozygous for Phe508del CFTR mutation and with ppFEV1 < 40%. Control subjects were matched for age, sex and ppFEV1, and had mutations ineligible for LUM/IVA. We assessed the rate of pulmonary exacerbations requiring intravenous antibiotics, the mean rate of change in ppFEV1 over 12 months and all adverse events. RESULTS: Data was collected from 7 Australian CF centres on 105 patients; 72 on LUM/IVA and 33 controls. LUM/IVA demonstrated a large reduction in exacerbations with an incident rate ratio of 0.455 (95%CI; 0.306 - 0.676), p <  0.001 after adjusting for the number of exacerbations in the previous 12 months. LUM/IVA prolonged the time to first exacerbation and reduced the rate of decline in ppFEV1 over 12 months. Adverse events were common; chest tightness or dyspnoea was experienced by 55% and resulted in cessation of treatment in 32%. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with LUM/IVA resulted in a substantially lower rate of pulmonary exacerbations, prolonged time to first exacerbation and slowed the rate of decline of ppFEV1 in participants with severe lung disease. Adverse reactions to LUM/IVA however were unacceptably frequent, and resulted in a very high discontinuation rate.

Longitudinal changes in lung function following initiation of lumacaftor/ivacaftor combination.

BACKGROUND: The combination of lumacaftor and ivacaftor (LUM/IVA) is a recently approved CFTR modulator treatment for homozygous F508del CF patients. Our study aimed at evaluating the change in the rate of lung function decline after one-year treatment with LUM/IVA. METHODS: The study evaluated patients homozygous for F508del, 12 to 23 years old. All had been treated for one year with LUM/IVA. The collected data included the percent predicted values of FEV1 (ppFEV1) and FVC (ppFVC), and the FEV1/FVC ratio (FEV1/FVC), that corresponded to 12, 24, and 36 months prior to, and 12 months after the initiation of LUM/IVA; also, the 3 highest values of the ppFEV1 (and the corresponding ppFVC, and FEV1/FVC) for the periods 0-12 months, 12-24 months, and 24-36 months prior to as well as the 12-month period after the initiation of LUM/IVA. The baseline lung function was estimated before the commencement of the drug. Data were analyzed longitudinally with generalized estimating equations models and continuous linear splines. A single knot was used that corresponded to the time point of LUM/IVA initiation. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were analyzed. The multivariate longitudinal analysis of spirometric indices with linear splines demonstrated a significant change in the slopes of ppFEV1 and ppFVC decline, reflecting a significant improvement after the initiation of LUM/IVA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study, lung function improved over a relatively short time period of only one year, after the commencement of LUM/IVA.

Ivacaftor in cystic fibrosis with residual function: Lung function results from an N-of-1 study.

BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor shows benefit in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and CFTR mutations associated with residual CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) function. Here we further assess the effect of ivacaftor in such patients using an N-of-1 study design. METHODS: Patients aged ≥12 years with CF with clinical or molecular evidence of residual CFTR function were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment sequences for two 4-week, double-blind crossover cycles (each divided into 2 weeks of ivacaftor treatment and placebo) followed by 8 weeks of open-label ivacaftor treatment. The primary endpoint was absolute change from cycle baseline of percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1) after 2 weeks of treatment with ivacaftor relative to placebo. RESULTS: Absolute change (SD) from study baseline in ppFEV1 favored ivacaftor by 2.3 (1.0) percentage points (95% credible interval, 0.4-4.1) after 2 weeks of treatment. Absolute mean change (SD) from open-label baseline (defined as day 1 of the open-label ivacaftor treatment period) in ppFEV1 after 8 weeks of treatment was 4.7 (4.2) percentage points (P<.0001). Safety of ivacaftor was consistent with that observed in prior studies. CONCLUSIONS: Ivacaftor improved lung function during the double-blind and open-label treatment periods in patients with CF and CFTR mutations associated with residual CFTR function (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01685801).

Efficacy and safety of the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor combination regimen in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation: a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators correct the basic defect caused by CFTR mutations. Improvements in health outcomes have been achieved with the combination of a CFTR corrector and potentiator in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation. The addition of elexacaftor (VX-445), a next-generation CFTR corrector, to tezacaftor plus ivacaftor further improved F508del-CFTR function and clinical outcomes in a phase 2 study in people with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation. METHODS: This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled trial of elexacaftor in combination with tezacaftor plus ivacaftor was done at 44 sites in four countries. Eligible participants were those with cystic fibrosis homozygous for the F508del mutation, aged 12 years or older with stable disease, and with a percentage predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1) of 40-90%, inclusive. After a 4-week tezacaftor plus ivacaftor run-in period, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 4 weeks of elexacaftor 200 mg orally once daily plus tezacaftor 100 mg orally once daily plus ivacaftor 150 mg orally every 12 h versus tezacaftor 100 mg orally once daily plus ivacaftor 150 mg orally every 12 h alone. The primary outcome was the absolute change from baseline (measured at the end of the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor run-in) in ppFEV1 at week 4. Key secondary outcomes were absolute change in sweat chloride and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain (CFQ-R RD) score. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03525548. FINDINGS: Between Aug 3 and Dec 28, 2018, 113 participants were enrolled. Following the run-in, 107 participants were randomly assigned (55 in the elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group and 52 in the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group) and completed the 4-week treatment period. The elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group had improvements in the primary outcome of ppFEV1 (least squares mean [LSM] treatment difference of 10·0 percentage points [95% CI 7·4 to 12·6], p<0·0001) and the key secondary outcomes of sweat chloride concentration (LSM treatment difference -45·1 mmol/L [95% CI -50·1 to -40·1], p<0·0001), and CFQ-R RD score (LSM treatment difference 17·4 points [95% CI 11·8 to 23·0], p<0·0001) compared with the tezacaftor plus ivacaftor group. The triple combination regimen was well tolerated, with no discontinuations. Most adverse events were mild or moderate; serious adverse events occurred in two (4%) participants receiving elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor and in one (2%) receiving tezacaftor plus ivacaftor. INTERPRETATION: Elexacaftor plus tezacaftor plus ivacaftor provided clinically robust benefit compared with tezacaftor plus ivacaftor alone, with a favourable safety profile, and shows the potential to lead to transformative improvements in the lives of people with cystic fibrosis who are homozygous for the F508del mutation. FUNDING: Vertex Pharmaceuticals.