Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 128.194
Filtrar
7.
J Intern Med ; 296(4): 362-376, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39221828

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) have widely been replaced by non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). This includes Austria, Germany and Switzerland, where as VKA, instead of warfarin, the much longer-acting phenprocoumon is used, which was not compared to NOACs in clinical trials. METHODS: Using administrative data from a large German health insurance, we included all anticoagulation-naïve patients with a first prescription of a NOAC or VKA between 2012 and 2020. We analysed overall survival, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, major thromboembolic events and major bleeding. RESULTS: Overall, 570,137 patients were included (apixaban: 26.9%, dabigatran: 4.6%, edoxaban: 8.8%, rivaroxaban: 39.1% and VKA: 20.7% of these 99.4% phenprocoumon). In the primary analysis using a 1:1 propensity score matching-cohort (PSM-cohort), a significantly higher overall mortality was found for apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (all p < 0.001) but not for dabigatran (p = 0.13) compared to VKA. In this PSM-cohort, 5-year mortality was 22.7% for apixaban versus 12.7% for VKA, 19.5% for edoxaban versus 11.4% for VKA, 16.0% for rivaroxaban versus 12.3% for VKA (all p < 0.001) and 13.0% for dabigatran versus 12.8% for VKA (p = 0.06). The observed effect was confirmed in sensitivity analyses using un-weighted and three different weighted Fine-Gray regression models on the basis of the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world analysis, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, but not dabigatran, were associated with worse survival compared to VKA. These findings, consistent with a few other studies including phenprocoumon, cast profound doubts on the unreflected, general use of NOACs. Randomized trials should assess whether phenprocoumon might actually be superior to NOACs.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Dabigatrán , Pirazoles , Piridinas , Piridonas , Rivaroxabán , Tiazoles , Vitamina K , Humanos , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Femenino , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Dabigatrán/efectos adversos , Masculino , Alemania/epidemiología , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Tiazoles/uso terapéutico , Tiazoles/efectos adversos , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Puntaje de Propensión , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Tromboembolia/mortalidad
8.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 2580, 2024 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39334000

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High-dose long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) has been associated with increased mortality and hospitalizations. Therefore, the evidence-based German guideline on LTOT for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) recommends to only exceed the maximum daily dose (MDD) of opioids in exceptional cases. This study aimed to determine the portion of LTOT patients who exceeded the guideline-recommended MDD and identify predictors of exceeding in administrative claims data. METHODS: The retrospective observational analysis of opioid prescriptions in patients receiving LTOT for CNCP was based on administrative claims by a large German statutory health insurance company. Patients with at least two quarters of opioid prescriptions between January 2018 and June 2019 were included and followed up for two years. Predictors were identified by logistic regression. In addition, the number of patients still in opioid therapy and the extent of exceeded MDDs were analyzed over time. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 113,475 patients. Overall, 10.5% of the patients exceeded the guideline-recommended MDD averaged over the observation period. Strong predictors for exceeding the MDD were receiving opioid prescriptions from > 7 physicians (OR = 7.66, p < .001), receiving predominantly strong opioids (OR = 6.79, p < .001) and receiving opioids for at least one year prior to inclusion (OR = 5.35, p < .001). Within the non-exceeding group, 28.1% discontinued opioid therapy. In contrast, 9.9% of patients in the exceeding group discontinued opioid therapy, whereas the vast majority remained on treatment until the end of the observation period. Furthermore, a slight increase in prescribed doses was observed over time. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that a moderate proportion of patients exceeded the guideline-recommended MDD. However, certain patient groups were more likely to receive high doses. This applied in particular to those who were already on treatment at the time of inclusion and continued to receive opioids until the end of the observation period. Further research should examine whether the continuous opioid therapy among the patients with exceeding the guideline-recommended MDD might be related to specific indications, a lack of therapeutic options or avoidance of withdrawal. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (drks.de/search/en). Identifier: DRKS00024854. Registered 28 April 2021.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Dolor Crónico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Alemania , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Adulto , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas
10.
13.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(10): 2205-2208, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39320234

RESUMEN

We tested 130 rats captured in Berlin for coronaviruses. SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 1 rat, but all animals were negative by reverse transcription PCR, suggesting SARS-CoV-2 was not circulating in the rat population. However, alphacoronaviruses were found. Monitoring rodent populations helps to determine coronavirus occurrence, transmission, and zoonotic potential.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animales , Ratas , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Berlin/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/virología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Humanos , Alemania/epidemiología , Coronavirus/genética , Coronavirus/clasificación , Zoonosis/virología
16.
Radiologie (Heidelb) ; 64(10): 811-819, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39316081
19.
Z Gerontol Geriatr ; 57(6): 500-507, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39316106
20.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 121(14): 480, 2024 Jul 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39320225

Asunto(s)
Humanos , Alemania
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...