Rehabilitation for Patients with COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome During Quarantine: A Single-Center Experience.

Background and Objectives: In this study, we evaluated clinical factors associated with implementing a rehabilitation program for patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) during the quarantine period. Materials and Methods: This observational study was conducted in the National Designated Isolated ICU, a dedicated COVID-19 center with 18 beds, from 30 December 2020 to 30 May 2022. One hundred and fifty-four patients (mean age: 67.3 ± 13.4 years; male: 59.7%) were enrolled. The ICU rehabilitation program included early mobilization, chest physiotherapy, and dysphagia treatment. Results: Forty-five patients (29.3%) participated in the rehabilitation program. Multivariate logistic regression identified three significant factors: tracheostomy (odds ratio [OR], 2.796; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.238-6.316; p = 0.013), body mass index ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 (OR, 2.724; 95% CI, 1.276-5.817; p = 0.010), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR, 2.931; 95% CI, 1.165-7.377; p = 0.022); patients with all three factors were younger (median 44 vs. 70 years, p < 0.001) and had significantly lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (median 12 vs. 16, p = 0.002) on the MV day. One-year cumulative mortality rates for patients with 0 to 3 factors were 66.7%, 50.8%, 38.9%, and 15.4%, respectively, with a significant difference among them (log-rank, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Three clinical factors associated with implementing a rehabilitation program during the quarantine period for COVID-19-associated ARDS patients were identified. The program was feasible and beneficial, particularly for younger patients with lower illness severity and fewer comorbidities on the day of MV.

Virtual Reality Strategies for Promoting Mobility in the Intensive Care Unit: A Case Report.

Prolonged bed rest is a known contributor to muscle atrophy, weakness, and deconditioning. Early active mobilization protocols aim to combat acquired weakness and loss of function in patients in the intensive care unit. Despite these benefits, mobilization of patients in the intensive care unit remains a challenge, most notably for patients with limited ability to get out of bed because of invasive devices and prolonged hospitalization. Virtual reality has gained favor for use in critical care to mitigate patients' stress, pain, and anxiety and to provide distraction and socialization. This case report demonstrates a novel application of virtual reality and the ease with which virtual reality can be used to facilitate early mobility and activity progression in the critically ill.

Patient, Practice, and Organizational Factors Associated With Early Mobility Performance in Critically Ill Adults.

BACKGROUND: Adoption of early mobility interventions into intensive care unit (ICU) practice has been slow and varied. OBJECTIVES: To examine factors associated with early mobility performance in critically ill adults and evaluate factors' effects on predicting next-day early mobility performance. METHODS: A secondary analysis of 66 ICUs' data from patients admitted for at least 24 hours. Mixed-effects logistic regression modeling was done, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) calculated. RESULTS: In 12 489 patients, factors independently associated with higher odds of next-day mobility included significant pain (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.23), documented sedation target (AOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.18), performance of spontaneous awakening trials (AOR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.59-1.96), spontaneous breathing trials (AOR, 2.35; 95% CI, 2.14-2.58), mobility safety screening (AOR, 2.26; 95% CI, 2.04-2.49), and prior-day physical/occupational therapy (AOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.30-1.59). Factors independently associated with lower odds of next-day mobility included deep sedation (AOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.39-0.49), delirium (AOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59-0.69), benzodiazepine administration (AOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92), physical restraints (AOR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.68-0.80), and mechanical ventilation (AOR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.68-0.78). Black and Hispanic patients had lower odds of next-day mobility than other patients. Models incorporating patient, practice, and between-unit variations displayed high discriminant accuracy (AUC, 0.853) in predicting next-day early mobility performance. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, several modifiable and nonmodifiable factors provide excellent prediction of next-day early mobility performance.

Guideline on positioning and early mobilisation in the critically ill by an expert panel.

A scientific panel was created consisting of 23 interdisciplinary and interprofessional experts in intensive care medicine, physiotherapy, nursing care, surgery, rehabilitative medicine, and pneumology delegated from scientific societies together with a patient representative and a delegate from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies who advised methodological implementation. The guideline was created according to the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF), based on The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. The topics of (early) mobilisation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, assist devices for mobilisation, and positioning, including prone positioning, were identified as areas to be addressed and assigned to specialist expert groups, taking conflicts of interest into account. The panel formulated PICO questions (addressing the population, intervention, comparison or control group as well as the resulting outcomes), conducted a systematic literature review with abstract screening and full-text analysis and created summary tables. This was followed by grading the evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence and a risk of bias assessment. The recommendations were finalized according to GRADE and voted using an online Delphi process followed by a final hybrid consensus conference. The German long version of the guideline was approved by the professional associations. For this English version an update of the systematic review was conducted until April 2024 and recommendation adapted based on new evidence in systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. In total, 46 recommendations were developed and research gaps addressed.

Effects of passive cycling on cerebrovascular reactivity in acute brain injured patients: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Early mobilization benefits critically ill patients, but concerns persist, especially in neurologic intensive care unit patients with acute brain injuries. This study assesses early mobility's impact on cerebrovascular autoregulation (CA) and systemic hemodynamics. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study focused on adult neurologic intensive care unit patients undergoing passive cycle ergometry. Data were collected from December 2020 to April 2022. Physical therapists conducted sessions using a standardized protocol, monitoring mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and intracranial pressure (ICP). The Pressure Reactivity Index (PRx) was calculated as a measure of CA. Statistical analysis included mixed models and repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: Eleven patients undergoing continuous physiologic monitoring and early mobility were included, primarily with subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracranial hemorrhage. Median time to protocol initiation was 4 days, with two patients discontinuing due to hemodynamic disturbances. Over a total of 11-hours of neuromonitoring data, passive cycling demonstrated a significant reduction in heart rate (HR), MAP, and ICP across different rotations per minute (RPM) settings compared to baseline. No significant alterations in PRx or cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were noted at various RPM levels. However, a significant difference in PRx emerged between patients who completed the protocol and those who did not, particularly at 10 RPM. DISCUSSION: This study offers preliminary insights into the impact of early mobility on CA in acute brain injured patients. While passive cycling demonstrates promise in preserving cerebral hemodynamics, its tolerability may not be uniform across all brain-injured patients. These findings highlight the need to determine optimal early mobilization timing and intensity in this population, emphasizing the necessity for larger prospective studies to validate these findings and inform clinical practice. DETAILS: This manuscript complies with all instructions to the authors. All coauthors meet the authorship requirements and have reviewed and approved the contents of the manuscript. The manuscript has not been published totally or partly, accepted for publication, or under editorial review for publication elsewhere. We have no conflicts of interest to disclose. STROBE checklist was reviewed prior to the submission of this paper. The manuscript adheres to ethical guidelines and was approved by Cleveland Clinic's institutional research board for retrospective study. There is no funding to disclose for this study.

Physical Rehabilitation and Mobilization in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Life Support: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: We planned to synthesize evidence examining the potential efficacy and safety of performing physical rehabilitation and/or mobilization (PR&M) in adult patients receiving extracorporeal life support (ECLS). DATA SOURCES: We included any study that compared PR&M to no PR&M or among different PR&M strategies in adult patients receiving any ECLS for any indication and any cannulation. We searched seven electronic databases with no language limitations. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers, independently and in duplicate, screened all citations for eligibility. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 and Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tools to assess individual study risk of bias. Although we had planned for meta-analysis, this was not possible due to insufficient data, so we used narrative and tabular data summaries for presenting results. We assessed the overall certainty of the evidence for each outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 17 studies that enrolled 996 patients. Most studies examined venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and/or venoarterial ECMO as a bridge to recovery in the ICU. We found an uncertain effect of high-intensity/active PR&M on mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, or quality of life compared with low-intensity/passive PR&M in patients receiving ECLS (very low certainty due to very serious imprecision). There was similarly an uncertain effect on safety events including clinically important bleeding, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, limb ischemia, accidental decannulation, or ECLS circuit dysfunction (very low certainty due to very serious risk of bias and imprecision). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the currently available summary of evidence, there is an uncertain effect of high-intensity/active PR&M on patient important outcomes or safety in patients receiving ECLS. Despite indirect data from other populations suggesting potential benefit of high-intensity PR&M in the ICU; further high-quality randomized trials evaluating the benefits and risks of physical therapy and/or mobilization in this population are needed.

Safety and practicality study of using an exoskeleton in acute neurosurgery patients.

INTRODUCTION: Early mobilization is key in neurologically impaired persons, limiting complications and improving long-term recovery. Self-balanced exoskeletons are used in rehabilitation departments to help patients stand and walk. We report the first case series of exoskeleton use in acute neurosurgery and intensive care patients, evaluating safety, clinical feasibility and patients' satisfaction. METHODS: We report a retrospective observational study including individuals hospitalized in the neurosurgical intensive care and neurosurgery departments. We included patients with a medical prescription for an exoskeleton session, and who met no contraindication. Patients benefited from standing sessions using a self-balanced exoskeleton (Atalante, Wandercraft, France). Patients and sessions data were collected. Safety, feasibility and adherence were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were scheduled for 70 standing sessions, of which 27 (39%) were completed. They were typically hospitalized for intracranial hemorrhage (74%) and presented with unilateral motor impairments, able to stand but with very insufficient weight shifting to the hemiplegic limb, requiring support (MRC 36.2 ± 3.70, SPB 2.0 ± 1.3, SPD 0.7 ± 0.5). The average duration of standing sessions was 16 ± 9 min. The only side effect was orthostatic hypotension (18.5%), which resolved with returning to seating position. The most frequent reason for not completing a session was understaffing (75%). All patients were satisfied and expressed a desire to repeat it. CONCLUSIONS: Physiotherapy using the exoskeleton is safe and feasible in the acute neurosurgery setting, although it requires adaptation from the staff to organize the sessions. An efficacy study is ongoing to evaluate the benefits for the patients.

Assessing the impact of early progressive mobilization on moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of neurodisability worldwide, with notably high disability rates among moderately severe TBI cases. Extensive previous research emphasizes the critical need for early initiation of rehabilitation interventions for these cases. However, the optimal timing and methodology of early mobilization in TBI remain to be conclusively determined. Therefore, we explored the impact of early progressive mobilization (EPM) protocols on the functional outcomes of ICU-admitted patients with moderate to severe TBI. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a trauma ICU of a medical center; 65 patients were randomly assigned to either the EPM group or the early progressive upright positioning (EPUP) group. The EPM group received early out-of-bed mobilization therapy within seven days after injury, while the EPUP group underwent early in-bed upright position rehabilitation. The primary outcome was the Perme ICU Mobility Score and secondary outcomes included Functional Independence Measure motor domain (FIM-motor) score, phase angle (PhA), skeletal muscle index (SMI), the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), and duration of ventilation. RESULTS: Among 65 randomized patients, 33 were assigned to EPM and 32 to EPUP group. The EPM group significantly outperformed the EPUP group in the Perme ICU Mobility and FIM-motor scores, with a notably shorter ICU stay by 5.9 days (p < 0.001) and ventilation duration by 6.7 days (p = 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed in PhAs. CONCLUSION: The early progressive out-of-bed mobilization protocol can enhance mobility and functional outcomes and shorten ICU stay and ventilation duration of patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. Our study's results support further investigation of EPM through larger, randomized clinical trials. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04810273 . Registered 13 March 2021.

Safety and feasibility of early mobilization in patients submitted to cardiac surgery using subxiphoid drain.

INTRODUCTION: Patients submitted to heart surgery are restricted to the bed of the Intensive Care Units (ICUs), due to this period of immobility the individual is likely to present clinical and functional alterations. These complications can be avoided by early mobilization; however, in some hospitals, this is not feasible due to the use of subxiphoid drain in the immediate postoperative period. OBJECTIVE: To verify the safety and feasibility of mobilizing patients after cardiac surgery using subxiphoid drain. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. On the first day the patient was positioned in sedestration in bed, then transferred from sitting to orthostasis, gait training and sedestration in an armchair. On the second postoperative day the same activities were performed, but with walking through the ICU with a progressive increase in distance. At all these moments, the patient was using the subxiphoid and intercostal drain. The patients were seen three times a day, but physical rehabilitation was performed twice. The adverse events considered were drain obstruction, accidental removal or displacement, total atrioventricular block, postoperative low output syndrome, cardiorespiratory arrest, pneumomediastinum, infection, and pericardial or myocardial damage. RESULTS: 176 patients were evaluated. Only 2 (0.4 %) of the patients had complications during or after mobilization, 1 (0.2 %) due to drain obstruction and 1 (0.2 %) due to accidental removal or displacement. CONCLUSION: Based on the data observed in the results, we found that the application of early mobilization in patients using subxiphoid drain after cardiac surgery is a safe and feasible conduct.

Impact of High-Dose Early Mobilization on Outcomes for Patients with Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of the TEAM Trial.

Rationale: Patients with diabetes represent almost 20% of all ICU admissions and might respond differently to high-dose early active mobilization. Objectives: To assess whether diabetes modified the relationship between the dose of early mobilization on clinical outcomes in the TEAM trial. Methods: All TEAM trial patients were included. The primary outcome was days alive and out of the hospital at Day 180. Secondary outcomes included 180-day mortality and long-term functional outcomes at Day 180. Logistic and median regression models were used to explore the effect of high-dose early mobilization on outcomes by diabetes status. Measurements and Main Results: All 741 patients from the original trial were included. Of these, 159 patients (21.4%) had diabetes. Patients with diabetes had fewer days alive and out of the hospital at Day 180 (124 [0-153] vs. 147 [82-164]; P = 0.013) and higher 180-day mortality (30% vs. 18%; P = 0.044). In patients receiving high-dose early mobilization, the number of days alive and out of the hospital at Day 180 was 73.0 (0.0-144.5) in patients with diabetes and 146.5 (95.8-163.0) in patients without diabetes (P value for interaction = 0.108). However, in patients with diabetes, high-dose early mobilization increased the odds of mortality at 180 days (adjusted odds ratio, 3.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-7.61; P value for interaction = 0.001). Conclusions: In this secondary analysis of the TEAM trial, in patients with diabetes, a high-dose early mobilization strategy did not significantly decrease the number of days alive and out of the hospital at Day 180, but it increased 180-day mortality.

Early Mobility Index and Patient Outcomes: A Retrospective Study in Multiple Intensive Care Units.

BACKGROUND: Early mobility interventions in intensive care units (ICUs) are safe and improve outcomes in subsets of critically ill adults. However, implementation varies, and the optimal mobility dose remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To test for associations between daily dose of out-of-bed mobility and patient outcomes in different ICUs. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study of electronic records from 7 adult ICUs in an academic quarternary hospital, multivariable linear regression was used to examine the effects of out-of-bed events per mobility-eligible day on mechanical ventilation duration and length of ICU and hospital stays. RESULTS: In total, 8609 adults hospitalized in ICUs from 2015 through 2018 were included. Patients were mobilized out of bed on 46.5% of ICU days and were eligible for mobility interventions on a median (IQR) of 2.0 (1-3) of 2.7 (2-9) ICU days. Median (IQR) out-of-bed events per mobility-eligible day were 0.5 (0-1.2) among all patients. For every unit increase in out-of-bed events per mobility-eligible day before extubation, mechanical ventilation duration decreased by 10% (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], -0.10 [-0.18 to -0.01]). Daily mobility increased ICU stays by 4% (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], 0.04 [0.03-0.06]) and decreased hospital stays by 5% (adjusted coefficient [95% CI], -0.05 [-0.07 to -0.03]). Effect sizes differed among ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: More daily out-of-bed mobility for ICU patients was associated with shorter mechanical ventilation duration and hospital stays, suggesting a dose-response relationship between daily mobility and patient outcomes. However, relationships differed across ICU subpopulations.

Smartfeeding: A Dynamic Strategy to Increase Nutritional Efficiency in Critically Ill Patients-Positioning Document of the Metabolism and Nutrition Working Group and the Early Mobilization Working Group of the Catalan Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (SOCMiC).

Adequate medical nutrition therapy for critically ill patients has an impact on their prognoses. However, it requires an individualized approach that takes into account the activity (phases of metabolic stress) and particularity of these patients. We propose a comprehensive strategy considering the patients' nutritional status and the set of modifiable circumstances in these patients, in order to optimize/support nutritional efficiency: (1) A detailed anamnesis and an adequate initial nutritional assessment must be performed in order to implement medical nutrition therapy that is in line with the needs and characteristics of each patient. Furthermore, risks associated with refeeding syndrome, nutritrauma or gastrointestinal dysfunction must be considered and prevented. (2) A safe transition between nutrition therapy routes and between health care units will greatly contribute to recovery. The main objective is to preserve lean mass in critically ill patients, considering metabolic factors, adequate protein intake and muscle stimulation. (3) Continuous monitoring is required for the successful implementation of any health strategy. We lack precise tools for calculating nutritional efficiency in critically ill patients, therefore thorough monitoring of the process is essential. (4) The medical nutrition approach in critically ill patients is multidisciplinary and requires the participation of the entire team involved. A comprehensive strategy such as this can make a significant difference in the functional recovery of critically ill patients, but leaders must be identified to promote training, evaluation, analysis and feedback as essential components of its implementation, and to coordinate this process with the recognition of hospital management.

Fatigue, fear of being mobilized and residual limb pain limit independent basic mobility and physiotherapy for patients early after major dysvascular lower extremity amputation: A prospective cohort study.

AIM: Early mobilization of patients with a major lower extremity amputation (LEA) is often a challenge because of lack of compliance. Therefore, we investigated factors limiting independent mobility and physiotherapy on the first day with physiotherapy (PTDay1) and the following 2 days after LEA. METHODS: A total of 60 consecutive patients, mean age 73.7 years (SD 12.1 years), undergoing LEA were included over a period of 7 months. The Basic Amputee Mobility Score was used to assess basic mobility. Predefined limitations for not achieving independent mobility or not completing physiotherapy were residual limb pain, pain elsewhere, fear of being mobilized, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, acute cognitive dysfunction or "other" factors reported on PTDay1 and the following 2 days after LEA. RESULTS: Fatigue and fear of being mobilized were the most frequent limitations for not achieving independent mobility on PTDay1 and the following 2 days after LEA. Patients (n = 55) who were not independent in the Basic Amputee Mobility Score activity transferring from bed to chair on PTDay1 were limited by fatigue (44%) and fear of being mobilized (33%). A total of 21 patients did not complete planned physiotherapy on PTDay1, and were limited by fatigue (38%), residual limb pain (24%) and "other" factors (24%). CONCLUSION: Fatigue and fear of being mobilized were the most frequent factors that limited independent mobility early after LEA. Fatigue, residual limb pain and "other" factors limited completion of physiotherapy. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; 24: 470-476.

Early Mobilization in Pediatric Critical Care: Exploring the Gap Between Theory and Practice in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND Because of advancements in critical care, Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) have experienced improved survival rates. However, PICU-acquired frailty and cognitive deficits continue to be issues. In PICUs, early mobilization is emerging as a useful technique. The present study assesses early mobilization awareness, opinions, and practices among pediatric critical care providers in Saudi Arabia. MATERIAL AND METHODS From July 2020 to February 2021, a survey was undertaken in Saudi Arabia, targeting 110 physicians, 200 nurses, 30 respiratory therapists, and 20 physiotherapists. It concentrated on emergency medicine practices, operational issues, initiation time, rehabilitation modalities, and PICU staff strain. RESULTS The results showed that 64.7% of the 266 respondents were nurses, usually working in 5- to 15-bed ICUs providing medical and surgical treatment. Early mobilization was evaluated as highly significant by 40.6% of the respondents. Equipment constraints (63.5%), patient medical instability (67.3%), endotracheal intubation complications (65.4%), and personnel limits (56.4%) were major challenges. Non-physicians cited space constraints 38.9% of the time, whereas physicians cited safety concerns 47.4% of the time. Respiratory physiotherapy and passive range-of-motion exercises were the most used rehabilitation techniques (77.8%). Only 38.7% of patients with ICU-acquired weakness were referred for outpatient therapy. CONCLUSIONS The study emphasizes the importance of early mobilization in Saudi Arabian pediatric critical care while also recognizing considerable limitations. Addressing these difficulties necessitates a multidisciplinary, strategic approach. Future research should strive to standardize practices to enhance patient outcomes and develop standards in pediatric critical care.

Early ambulation impacts on quality-of-life outcomes positively after lower limb burn injury: A group trajectory analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the challenges of providing burn care throughout the 2.5MKm2 jurisdiction of Western Australia, early intervention after injury remains a key premise of the multidisciplinary model of care applied by the State Adult Burn Unit (SABU) team. In particular, contemporary guidelines support the facilitation of early ambulation after lower limb burn and skin grafting. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the association between the timing of ambulation after burn and surgery on quality of life (QoL) outcomes. METHODS: Data from 1707 lower limb burn patients aged ≥ 18, admitted to the SABU between February 2011- December 2019, were included. Self-reported QoL longitudinal outcomes were assessed using the Short Form 36 and Burn Specific Health Scale Brief. Three recovery trajectories were defined according to their QoL outcome responses, mapped out to one year. Early ambulation was defined as occurring within 48 h of acute burn or surgery, as per SABU routine practice. RESULTS: Early ambulation was shown to have a positive association to the higher QoL trajectory group (>75% of cohort), though not statistically significant for the Physical Component (PCS) and Mental health Component (MCS) summary scores of the SF36; however, ambulation pathway was associated with adjusted long-term BSHS-B QoL outcomes. The least favorable trajectory of long-term recovery of the physical aspects of QoL was seen in those with higher TBSA and complications and increasing age and comorbidities. In contrast, the mental health components of QoL were robust to all those factors, apart from pre-existing comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Early ambulation after lower limb burn, and surgery, was positively associated with early and long-term QoL outcomes. Recovery trajectory is strongly indicated by where the patient journey begins after early acute care. The optimal physical QoL recovery trajectory was shared by those who were younger with reduced TBSA; complications; and, comorbidities whereas the mental health QoL trajectories were only impacted by comorbidities.