Subcutaneous amikacin administration in red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans) produces prolonged detectable plasma concentrations without biochemistry evidence of impaired renal function.

OBJECTIVE: To establish pilot data on the plasma concentrations of SC amikacin at 2 doses in red-eared sliders and evaluate concurrent plasma biochemistry parameters. ANIMALS: 8 adult red-eared sliders (Trachemys scripta elegans). METHODS: Amikacin was administered SC at target doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg with a 3-week washout period. Blood samples were collected at 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours postadministration. Plasma amikacin concentrations were quantified using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma biochemistry analyses were performed before amikacin administration, 1 week post 5-mg/kg administration, and 1 week post 10-mg/kg administration. RESULTS: Mean maximum amikacin plasma concentrations were recorded 24 hours after 5-mg/kg and 10-mg/kg dosing and were 17.5 ± 2.32 µg/mL and 23.6 ± 2.92 µg/mL, respectively. Mean plasma concentrations after 5-mg/kg dosing steadily decreased to 9.1 ± 0.92 µg/mL by 96 hours postadministration. Amikacin remained detectable in all plasma samples 3 weeks post 5-mg/kg dosing with a mean plasma concentration of 1.04 ± 0.22 µg/mL. Mean plasma concentrations after 10-mg/kg dosing did not decrease over the 96-hour study period. There were no clinically relevant changes in biochemistry parameters. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Amikacin persists at detectable plasma levels for at least 3 weeks after SC administration of a 5-mg/kg dose in red-eared sliders, which has not previously been reported in any species. No biochemistry changes consistent with renal toxicity occurred after either dose. Use caution with repeated amikacin dosing in this species until further studies can better characterize cumulative amikacin pharmacokinetics and toxic threshold.

Pharmacokinetics of amikacin after intravenous, intra-articular, and combined intravenous and intra-articular administration in healthy neonatal foals.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetics of amikacin administered IV to neonatal foals are described, but little data are available regarding the plasma concentrations contributed by concurrent intra-articular (IA) administration. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Compare the pharmacokinetics of amikacin when the total dose is administered IV compared to being divided between IV and IA routes of administration in neonatal foals and predict the plasma concentrations from various combined IV and IA dosing regimens. ANIMALS: Eight healthy neonatal foals. METHODS: Foals received 3 amikacin treatment protocols: (1) IV-only (25 mg/kg q24h IV), (2) concurrent IV and IA (16.7 mg/kg q24h IV and 8.3 mg/kg q24h into 1 tarsocrural joint), and (3) IA-only (8.3 mg/kg q24h into 1 tarsocrural joint). Protocols were administered for 3 days beginning at 7, 14, and 21 days of age. Plasma concentrations ≥53 µg/mL at 30 minutes were considered therapeutic for isolates with intermediate susceptibility. RESULTS: Foal age was a significant variable. The IV-only protocol met or exceeded the 30-minute plasma concentrations considered therapeutic (mean µg/mL [95% confidence interval, CI]) in 7- to 9-day-old (54.0 [52.2-56.9]), 14- to 16-day-old (58.1 [55.2-61.0]), and 21- to 23-day-old (66.6 [63.7-69.6]) foals. Concurrent IV and IA protocol did not reach the 30-minute concentration considered therapeutic in 7- to 9-day-old foals (46.5 [43.6-49.4]) but did in 14- to 16-day-old (62.9 [60.0-65.8]) and 21-to 23-day-old (62.6 [59.7-65.6]) foals. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Concurrent IV and IA administration of amikacin produces 30-minute plasma concentrations considered therapeutic in foals 14 to 23 days old, but concentrations observed in younger foals might be below those considered therapeutic for isolates with intermediate susceptibility to amikacin.

A simulation study on model-informed precision dosing of amikacin for achieving target area under the concentration-time curve.

AIMS: Amikacin requires therapeutic drug monitoring for optimum efficacy; however, the optimal model-informed precision dosing strategy for the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of amikacin is uncertain. This simulation study aimed to determine the efficient blood sampling points using the Bayesian forecasting approach for early achievement of the target AUC range for amikacin in critically ill patients. METHODS: We generated a virtual population of 3000 individuals using 2 validated population pharmacokinetic models identified using a systematic literature search. AUC for each blood sampling point was evaluated using the probability of achieving a ratio of estimated/reference AUC at steady state in the 0.8-1.2 range. RESULTS: On day 1, the 1-point samplings for population pharmacokinetic models showed a priori probabilities of 26.3 and 45.6%, which increased to 47.3 and 94.4% at 23 and 15 h, respectively. Using 2-point sampling at the peak (3 and 4 h) and trough (24 h) on day 1, these probabilities further increased to 72.3 and 99.5%, respectively. These probabilities were comparable on days 2 and 3, regardless of 3 and 6 sampling points or estimated glomerular filtration rate. These results indicated the higher predictive accuracy of 2-point sampling than 1-point sampling on day 1 for amikacin AUC estimation. Moreover, 2-point sampling was a more reasonable approach than rich sampling. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the development of an efficient model-informed precision dosing strategy for early targeting of amikacin AUC in critically ill patients.

Assessment of the Effects of a High Amikacin Dose on Plasma Peak Concentration in Critically Ill Children.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the incidence of amikacin plasma peak concentration (Cmax) below 60 mg·L-1 in critically ill children receiving an amikacin dosing regimen of 30 mg kg-1·day-1. Secondary objectives were to identify factors associated with low Cmax and to assess the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed in two French pediatric intensive care units. All admitted children who received 30 mg·kg-1 amikacin and had a Cmax measurement were eligible. Clinical and biological data, amikacin dose, and concentrations were collected. RESULTS: In total, 30 patients were included, aged from 3 weeks to 7 years. They received a median amikacin dosage of 30 mg kg-1·day-1 (range 29-33) based on admission body weight (BW), corresponding to 27 mg kg-1·day-1 (range 24-30) based on actual BW. Cmax was < 60 mg·L-1 in 21 (70%) children and none had a Cmax ≥ 80 mg·L-1. Among the 15 patients with a measured minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), 13 (87%) had a Cmax/MIC ratio > 8. Univariate analysis showed that factors associated with Cmax < 60 mg·L-1 were high estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.015) and low blood urea concentration (p = 0.001). AKI progression or occurrence was observed after amikacin administration in two (7%) and six (21%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the administration of the maximal recommended amikacin dose, Cmax was below the pharmacokinetic target in 70% of our pediatric population. Further studies are needed to develop a pharmacokinetic model in a population of critically ill children to optimize target attainment.

Analytical validation of a quantitative method for therapeutic drug monitoring on the Alinity®c Abbott.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the analytical performance of the Alinity®c Abbott compared to the Architect® immunoassay system for the determination of drugs having a narrow therapeutic index. METHODS: Valproic acid, amikacin, gentamicin, phenobarbital and vancomycin were analyzed using Particle-Enhanced Turbidimetric Inhibitor Immunoassay (Petinia), phenytoin and theophylline were analyzed using an immunoenzymatic method and a colorimetric method was performed to quantify lithium. The methods were validated according to the total error approach. Seven validation standards were analyzed in quintuplet during four days to establish the limits of the methods. Dilution integrity and interferences (hemolysis and high concentrations of bilirubin and lipids) were also tested. Depending on the analyte, the results obtained for twenty to forty patients on the Alinity® were compared to those obtained on the Architect®. RESULTS: The bias and the coefficients of variation for repeatability and for intermediate precision were lower than 15% for all drugs. Accuracy profiles were acceptable (acceptance limits fixed at 30%) in the validated ranges. The lower limits of quantification (LLOQ) were similar to those determined by Abbott except for gentamicin for which we determined a LLOQ at 1.22 mg/L while Abbott determined it at 0.5 mg/L. All assays diluted linear and analyte concentrations were not affected by interferences. Concentrations obtained for real samples on the Alinity®c are comparable to those obtained on the Architect®ci. CONCLUSIONS: The analytical validation of a method suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of drugs on the Alinity®c meets the requirements of European Medicines Agency.

Evaluation of Assays to Measure Aminoglycosides in Serum: Comparison of Accuracy and Precision Based on External Quality Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Aminoglycosides require highly accurate therapeutic drug monitoring owing to their narrow therapeutic windows and toxic side effects. Therapeutic drug monitoring varies in different laboratories, and this difference is mainly due to the use of different analytical techniques. This study aimed to compare the accuracy and precision of immunoassays for the measurement of gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin in serum. METHODS: Human plasma samples were spiked with known concentrations of amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin and dispatched to laboratories worldwide. The percentage deviation and coefficient of variation were calculated to compare the accuracy and precision among immunoassays and among antibiotics. RESULTS: We analyzed 273, 534, and 207 amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin measurement results, obtained satisfactory rates of 83.9%, 86.3%, and 93.7%, and coefficients of variation ranging from 1.1% to 15.6%, 2.9% to 25.2%, and 1.8% to 27.0%, respectively. The percentage deviation ranged from -7.5% to 6.6%, -20.8% to 18.7%, and -33.2% to 41.5% for amikacin, gentamicin, and tobramycin, respectively. Significant differences were observed in accuracy and precision among assays for all antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated high variations in results obtained from antibiotic assays conducted at different laboratories worldwide.

Dried plasma spots for therapeutic monitoring of amikacin: Validation of an UHPLC-MS/MS assay and pharmacokinetic application.

Amikacin (AMI) is an aminoglycoside antibiotic widely used in the treatment of severe infections caused by multi-resistant bacteria, with established exposition targets in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The usual specimen for AMI concentration measurement is plasma or serum. The access to TDM of AMI in Developing Countries is constrained by the limited availability of laboratories performing the quantitation of this drug. In this context, the use of dried microsamples, such as dried plasma spots (DPS) could be an alternative to allow reduced specimen transportation and storage costs in resource-limited settings, increasing the access to TDM of AMI. This study aimed to develop and validate the first report of simultaneous determination of AMI and creatinine (CRE) in DPS, using UHPLC-MS/MS. Precision, accuracy and stability assays showed acceptable results. AMI was stable in DPS for 14 days at 6 °C, 2 days at 22 °C, and one day at 42 °C. CRE was stable during 14 days at all tested temperatures. AMI and CRE concentrations in DPS and plasma were compared by Passing-Bablok regression and Bland and Altmann plots and presented comparable results. Estimates of patient's clearance, volume of distribution and suggested doses of AMI were also similar using DPS or plasma concentrations. The assay provides a useful logistic alternative to allow more widespread access to dose individualization of AMI in limited resources settings.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin Administered Once Daily in Patients with Different Renal Functions.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of amikacin in Mexican patients with different renal functions receiving once-daily dosing regimens and the influence of clinical and demographical covariates that may influence the optimization of this antibiotic. A prospective study was performed in a total of 63 patients with at least one determination of amikacin plasma concentration. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were estimated by nonlinear mixed-effects modeling; validations were performed for dosing recommendation purposes based on PK/pharmacodynamic simulations. The concentration-versus-time data were best described by a one-compartment open model with proportional interindividual variability associated with amikacin clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V); residual error followed a homoscedastic trend. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) and ideal body weight (IBW) demonstrated significant influence on amikacin CL and V, respectively. The final model [CL (liters/h) = 7.1 × (CLCR/130)0.84 and V (liters) = 20.3 × (IBW/68)2.9] showed a mean prediction error of 0.11 mg/liter (95% confidence interval, -3.34, 3.55) in the validation performed in a different group of patients with similar characteristics. There is a wide variability in amikacin PK parameters in Mexican patients. This leads to inadequate dosing regimens, especially in patients with augmented renal clearance (CLCR of >130 ml/min). Optimization based on the final population PK model in Mexican patients may be useful, since reliability and clinical applicability have been demonstrated in this study.

Evaluation of Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin as a Predictor of Glomerular Filtration Rate and Amikacin Clearance During Early Rat Endotoxemia: Comparison with Traditional Endogenous and Exogenous Biomarkers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Renal elimination of amikacin and other aminoglycosides is slowed down in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury increasing the risk of adverse effects. Since neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and aminoglycosides share the mechanisms for renal excretion, the predictive power of NGAL was examined towards the changes in amikacin pharmacokinetics during early endotoxemia in anesthetized Wistar rats. METHODS: Endogenous biomarkers of inflammation and acute kidney injury were assessed including NGAL in saline-injected controls and two groups of rats challenged with an intravenous injection of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (5 mg/kg)-a fluid-resuscitated group (LPS) and a fluid-resuscitated group infused intravenously with 8 µg/kg/h terlipressin (LPS-T). Sinistrin and amikacin were infused to measure glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and amikacin clearance (CLam). The investigations included blood gas analysis, chemistry and hematology tests and assessment of urine output, creatinine clearance (CLcr) and sinistrin clearance (CLsini). RESULTS: Within 3 h of injection, systemic and renal inflammatory responses were induced by lipopolysaccharide. Gene and protein expression of NGAL was increased in the kidneys and the concentrations of NGAL in the plasma (pNGAL) and urine rose 4- to 38-fold (P < 0.01). The decreases in CLam and the GFR markers (CLcr, CLsini) were proportional, reflecting the extent to which endotoxemia impaired the major elimination mechanism for the drug. Terlipressin attenuated lipopolysaccharide-induced renal dysfunction (urine output, CLcr, CLsini) and accelerated CLam. The pNGAL showed a strong association with the CLsini (rs = - 0.77, P < 0.0005). Concerning prediction of CLam, pNGAL was comparable to CLcr (mean error - 24%) and inferior to CLsini (mean error - 6.4%), while the measurement of NGAL in urine gave unsatisfactory results. CONCLUSIONS: During early endotoxemia in the rat, pNGAL has a moderate predictive ability towards CLam. Clinical studies should verify whether pNGAL can support individualized dosing of aminoglycosides to septic patients.

A Retrospective Review of the Efficiency of First-Dose Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Gentamicin, Amikacin, and Vancomycin in the Pediatric Population.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has become standard clinical practice for gentamicin, amikacin, and vancomycin to optimize efficacy and reduce toxicity. TDM after the first dose of antibiotic was adopted in our institution. This study aims to evaluate if target therapeutic drug concentrations could be achieved more rapidly in patients with TDM performed after the first dose of gentamicin, amikacin, or vancomycin compared to TDM at steady state. A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore. Patients aged 1 month to 18 years old who received amikacin, gentamicin, or vancomycin between October 2012 to March 2016 and had at least 2 serum drug concentrations done within the same dosing interval were included. The primary objective was to compare the time taken to achieve target serum drug concentrations between first-dose and steady-state TDM. A total of 334 patients on amikacin, 211 patients on gentamicin, and 140 patients on vancomycin were included. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median number of days to optimize therapy was significantly shorter after first-dose TDM was performed for amikacin (first dose, 1.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.44-1.89] days vs steady state, 2.85 [95%CI, 2.50-3.25] days; P < .01] and gentamicin (first dose, 1.66 [95%CI, 1.25-2.08] days vs steady state, 3.54 [95%CI, 2.40-4.75] days; P < .01] but not vancomycin (first dose, 1.34 [95%CI, 1.06-1.52] days vs steady state, 1.42 [95%CI, 1.26-1.59] days; P = .99]. First-dose TDM for gentamicin and amikacin resulted in faster attainment of target serum concentrations but did not for vancomycin. Further validation of its impact on actual clinical outcomes may be required.

Population pharmacokinetics of amikacin in patients with pediatric cystic fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Amikacin is commonly used in patients with pediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) for the treatment of pulmonary exacerbations. Amikacin efficacy is related to maximum plasma concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration (Cmax/MIC) ratio >8. Pharmacokinetic data in patients with pediatric CF are scarce. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model describing amikacin disposition in patients with pediatric CF. METHODS: CF patients under 18 years of age with pulmonary exacerbation who received amikacin were enrolled. Patients received different amikacin regimens (30 mg-1 kg-1 day-1 every 8, 12, or 24 hours) depending on the patient's status and hospital protocols. Amikacin serum levels were obtained for therapeutic drug monitoring. PopPK model was developed using MONOLIX Suite-2018R1 (Lixoft). RESULTS: A total of 39 patients (114 amikacin concentrations) were included in this study. Population estimates for the elimination rate constant (k) and the volume of distribution (V) were 0.541 hours-1 and 0.451 L/kg, respectively. Between-subject and between-occasion variability were 53% and 16.5% for k and 31% and 22% for V, respectively. Bodyweight was a significant covariate associated with V. Based on simulations, almost 70% of the patients receiving 30 mg-1 kg-1 day-1 every 24 hours would achieve a Cmax/MIC ratio >8 which is an appropriate therapeutic goal while no patient in the other two groups (Q8 and Q12) would achieve that objective. CONCLUSIONS: The regimen of 30 mg-1 kg-1 day-1 every 24 hours more adequately fulfilled the therapeutic target for amikacin. Although all our patients had good clinical results and a good adverse-events profile, further studies are necessary to redefine the optimal treatment strategy.

Ready for TDM: Simultaneous quantification of amikacin, vancomycin and creatinine in human plasma employing ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

BACKGROUND: Amikacin (AMI) and vancomycin (VAN) are antibiotics largely used in intensive care in the empiric treatment of severe infections by multi-resistant gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. AMI and VAN are eliminated untransformed by glomerular filtration, showing depuration ratio highly correlated with creatinine (CRE) clearance. AMI, VAN and CRE are highly polar structures, presenting poor retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography when using conventional stationary phases. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate a simple UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of AMI, VAN, and CRE in human plasma for therapeutic drug monitoring. RESULTS: Samples were prepared by protein precipitation, followed by dilution. Heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA) was added to the mobile phase at low concentration (0.01%), and separation was performed in an ultra-performance reversed-phase column (particle diameter of 1.8 µm). These conditions allowed retention times of 0.92, 0.93, 2.12, 2.17 and 2.27 min for CRE, CRE-D3, AMI, KAN and VAN, respectively. The assay was linear from 0.5 to 100 mg L-1 for AMI and VAN and 5 to 100 mg L-1. Precision, accuracy and stability assays were acceptable according to bioanalytical validation guidelines. Suitable results. Matrix effects were in the range of +10.5 to +11.6% for AMI, -4.3 to -4.5% for VAN, and - 1.7 to +0.7 for CRE. CONCLUSION: The first assay for the simultaneous determination of AMI, VAN and CRE in plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was reported. This assay allows the obtention of the necessary analytical data for the clinical application of population pharmacokinetic methods for therapeutic drug monitoring of AMI and VAN.

PHARMECMO: Therapeutic drug monitoring and adequacy of current dosing regimens of antibiotics in patients on Extracorporeal Life Support.

INTRODUCTION: Optimisation of antibiotic therapy for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients remains a pharmacological challenge. The objective of this study was to observe the plasma concentrations of commonly used antibiotics in intensive care for patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PHARMECMO study was a pilot, prospective study, conducted in a cardiac surgery intensive care unit. Every adult patient under ECMO support, with known or suspected sepsis and receiving antibiotic therapy, was eligible for inclusion. Plasma concentrations of antibiotics were determined by a combination of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Forty-four eligible patients were enrolled for 68 inclusions on a twelve-month period. For the association piperacillin-tazobactam (n=19), 68.7% of CT50 and 93.7% of Cmin reached the pharmacokinetic goals defined (64 mg.L-1 for CT50 and 16 mg.L-1 for Cmin). For cefotaxime (n=12), the pharmacokinetic goals (4 mg.L-1 for CT50 and 1 mg.L-1 for Cmin) were achieved in 100% of the cases for CT50 and in 81.8% of the cases for Cmin. Regarding imipenem (n=10), the pharmacokinetic goals were 16 mg.L-1 for CT50 and 4 mg.L-1 for Cmin. Only one CT50 was above 16 mg.L-1. For Cmin, 60% of the doses did not reach the target concentration. In our 10 patients, only one patient was considered as reaching the pharmacokinetic goals. Finally, for amikacin (n=6), four Cmax (66.7%) were infra-therapeutics for a target between 60 and 80 mg.L-1. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring could optimise the achievement of pharmacokinetic objectives associated with an effective antibiotic therapy. For most patients, the recommended doses of imipenem and amikacin did not achieve the pK targets.

Amikacin Pharmacokinetics in Terminal Stage of Hematological Malignancy.

BACKGROUND: The influence of cancer cachexia on the pharmacokinetics of and kidney injury caused by amikacin remains unclear. This study investigated whether the pharmacokinetics of amikacin and the risk of kidney injury are altered with the progression of cancer cachexia. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted using therapeutic drug monitoring data obtained from 52 cancer patients who received amikacin intravenously for infection(s). The patients were classified into 2 groups based on the status of cachexia using a consensus definition: noncachexia group (n = 31) and cachexia group (n = 21). Differences in amikacin pharmacokinetics and occurrence of kidney injury were compared between the 2 groups. Amikacin pharmacokinetics was calculated based on a 1-compartment model using peak and trough concentrations measured clinically for therapeutic drug monitoring. In addition, intrapatient analysis was conducted based on patients who received amikacin treatments more than once during the study period to examine the alteration in amikacin pharmacokinetics with the progression of cancer cachexia. RESULTS: Systemic clearance of amikacin [median (range)] was significantly (P < 0.05) lower in the cachexia group [37.3 (11.2-87.3) (mL/min)] than in the noncachexia group [52.0 (19.1-133.4) (mL/min)]. In contrast, volume of distribution was significantly (P < 0.05) increased in the cachexia group [0.47 (0.20-1.45) L/kg] compared with the noncachexia group [0.32 (0.21-1.00) L/kg]. There was no difference in the occurrence of kidney injuries between the 2 groups. In an intrapatient analysis of the longitudinal alteration of amikacin pharmacokinetics, an approximately 50% reduction in clearance and 30% increase in volume of distribution were observed as cancer cachexia progressed. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that progression of cancer cachexia may reduce amikacin clearance and increase the volume of distribution, but cancer cachexia does not increase amikacin-induced kidney injury.

Interest of therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides administered by a monodose regimen.

BACKGROUND: Although the once-daily regimen of aminoglycosides (AG) is considered as predominantly used by many centers, the level of evidence of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of AG in cases of once-daily has not been clearly defined. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of TDM in achievement or maintaining target serum concentrations in patients receiving once-daily administration of AG. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from patients having received a once daily amikacin or gentamicin and underwent routine TDM. A longitudinal follow up was performed. Data were analyzed according to the adhesion or not to recommendations. A logistic regression was performed in order to evaluate the effect of covariates (age, gender, weight, creatinine clearance [CLcr], TDM-based dose adjustment, weighted dose of AG) on the achievement of non-toxic Cmin. RESULTS: A total 437 blood samples issued from 324 patients were analyzed. The cut-off value of Clcr associated with a risk of toxic Cmin was≤41.66mL/min (OR: 11.29; 95%CI: 7.21-17.61; P<0.0001). Eighty-eight patients (27.1%) have at least two sampling points. The univariate analysis showed that the age, weight, CLcr and TDM-based dose adjustment were found to be significant factors in the achievement of non-toxic Cmin. In multivariate analysis, only TDM-based dose adjustment remains a significant factor in the achievement of non-toxic Cmin (OR: 6.66; 95%CI: 2.26-19.63; P=0.0006). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the usefulness of TDM-based dosing adjustment of AG antibiotics in achieving nontoxic trough concentrations, particularly in critically ill patients, as they are prone to a renal impairment.

Relationship between amikacin blood concentration and ototoxicity in low birth weight infants.

Amikacin (AMK) is used as empiric therapy for severe infections such as sepsis in low birth weight (LBW) infants. AMK administered once daily (OD) in adults is reported to be therapeutically effective and prevent side effects, however, evidence on AMK administration in LBW infants is limited, with no clear indications of effectiveness. We performed therapeutic drug monitoring analysis of 20 infants treated with AMK OD for severe infections such as bacteremia. Treatment effectiveness was admitted by the patients' medical records, and side effects of renal dysfunction and ototoxicity were investigated. The mean gestational age was 30.4 ± 5 weeks and mean body weight (Bw) was 1280.2 ± 809.8 g. The mean AMK dose was 14.1 ± 2.6 mg/kg and mean administration period was 10.1 ± 4.1 days. Blood concentration was measured 6.3 ± 2.3 days after AMK administration; mean peak and trough concentrations were 29.1 ± 7.5 µg/mL and 7.6 ± 6.9 µg/mL, respectively. Additionally, therapeutic effect was observed in all patients, and no significant change in serum creatinine (CRE) concentration (a marker of renal dysfunction) was observed, suggesting no renal dysfunction. Ototoxicity was observed in 4 patients, 3 of whom had trough concentrations ≥10 µg/mL. When we categorized patients into two groups using a trough cut-off value of 10 µg/mL, no difference in AMK dose was observed. However, there were significant differences in peak concentration, Bw, volume of distribution and CRE. Our findings suggest AMK trough concentration ≥10 µg/mL significantly affects ototoxicity in neonates.

Predictors of insufficient peak amikacin concentration in critically ill patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Amikacin infusion requires targeting a peak serum concentration (Cmax) 8-10 times the minimal inhibitory concentration, corresponding to a Cmax of 60-80 mg/L for the least susceptible bacteria to theoretically prevent therapeutic failure. Because drug pharmacokinetics on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are challenging, we undertook this study to assess the frequency of insufficient amikacin Cmax in critically ill patients on ECMO and to identify relative risk factors. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational, monocentric study in a university hospital. Patients on ECMO who received an amikacin loading dose for suspected Gram-negative infections were included. The amikacin loading dose of 25 mg/kg total body weight was administered intravenously and Cmax was measured 30 min after the end of the infusion. Independent predicators of Cmax < 60 mg/L after the first amikacin infusion were identified with mixed-model multivariable analyses. Various dosing simulations were performed to assess the probability of reaching 60 mg/L < Cmax < 80 mg/L. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients on venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) (68%) or venovenous-ECMO (32%) were included. At inclusion, their median (1st; 3rd quartile) Sequential Organ-Failure Assessment score was 15 (12; 18) and 54 patients (51%) were on renal replacement therapy. Overall ICU mortality was 54%. Cmax was < 60 mg/L in 41 patients (39%). Independent risk factors for amikacin under-dosing were body mass index (BMI) < 22 kg/m2 and a positive 24-h fluid balance. Using dosing simulation, increasing the amikacin dosing regimen to 30 mg/kg and 35 mg/kg of body weight when the 24-h fluid balance is positive and the BMI is ≥ 22 kg/m2 or < 22 kg/m2 (Table 3), respectively, would have potentially led to the therapeutic target being reached in 42% of patients while reducing under-dosing to 23% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO-treated patients were under-dosed for amikacin in one third of cases. Increasing the dose to 35 mg/kg of body weight in low-BMI patients and those with positive 24-h fluid balance on ECMO to reach adequate targeted concentrations should be investigated.

Penetration of Ciprofloxacin and Amikacin into the Alveolar Epithelial Lining Fluid of Rats with Pulmonary Fibrosis.

We determined the concentration-time profiles of ciprofloxacin and amikacin in serum and alveolar epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of rats with or without pulmonary fibrosis and investigated the effect of pulmonary fibrosis on the capacity for penetration of antimicrobials into the ELF of rats. Pulmonary fibrosis was induced in rats with a single intratracheal instillation of bleomycin. After intravenous injection of ciprofloxacin or amikacin, blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples were collected. Urea concentrations in serum and lavage fluid were determined using an enzymatic assay. Ciprofloxacin and amikacin concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, respectively. The mean ratio of ELF to plasma concentrations of ciprofloxacin at each time point in the normal group did not significantly differ from that in the pulmonary fibrosis group. However, the ratio of the ciprofloxacin area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) in ELF to the AUC0-24 in plasma was 1.02 in the normal group and 0.76 in the pulmonary fibrosis group. The mean ELF-to-plasma concentration ratios of amikacin at each time point in the normal group were higher than those in the pulmonary fibrosis group, reaching a statistically significant difference at 1, 2, and 4 h. The ratio of the AUC0-24 in ELF to the AUC0-24 in plasma was 0.49 in the normal group and 0.27 in the pulmonary fibrosis group. In conclusion, pulmonary fibrosis can influence the penetration of antimicrobials into the ELF of rats and may have a marked effect on the penetration of amikacin than that of ciprofloxacin.

Reduced Chance of Hearing Loss Associated with Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Aminoglycosides in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Hearing loss and nephrotoxicity are associated with prolonged treatment duration and higher dosage of amikacin and kanamycin. In our tuberculosis center, we used therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) targeting preset pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) surrogate endpoints in an attempt to maintain efficacy while preventing (oto)toxicity. To evaluate this strategy, we retrospectively evaluated medical charts of tuberculosis (TB) patients treated with amikacin or kanamycin in the period from 2000 to 2012. Patients with culture-confirmed multiresistant or extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/XDR-TB) receiving amikacin or kanamycin as part of their TB treatment for at least 3 days were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Clinical data, including maximum concentration (Cmax), Cmin, and audiometry data, were extracted from the patients' medical charts. A total of 80 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean weighted Cmax/MIC ratios obtained from 57 patients were 31.2 for amikacin and 12.3 for kanamycin. The extent of hearing loss was limited and correlated with the cumulative drug dose per kg of body weight during daily administration. At follow-up, 35 (67.3%) of all patients had successful outcome; there were no relapses. At a median dose of 6.5 mg/kg, a correlation was found between the dose per kg of body weight during daily dosing and the extent of hearing loss in dB at 8,000 Hz. These findings suggest that the efficacy at this lower dosage is maintained with limited toxicity. A randomized controlled trial should provide final proof of the safety and efficacy of TDM-guided use of aminoglycosides in MDR-TB treatment.

Amikacin use and therapeutic drug monitoring in adults: do dose regimens and drug exposures affect either outcome or adverse events? A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to identify the amikacin dosage regimens and drug concentrations consistent with good outcomes and to determine the drug exposures related to nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. METHODS: A literature review was conducted in Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Full journal articles reporting randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, interrupted time series trials, and controlled before and after studies involving amikacin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and dose adjustment were considered for inclusion. RESULTS: Seventeen studies for inclusion were identified, comprising 1677 participants. Amikacin doses ranged from 11 to 15 mg/kg/day with 13 studies using 15 mg/kg/day. Studies were generally designed to compare different aminoglycosides rather than to assess concentration-effect relationships. Only 11 papers presented data on target concentrations, rate of clinical cure and toxicity. Target peak concentrations ranged from 15 to 40 mg/L and target troughs were typically <10 or <5 mg/L. It was not clear whether these targets were achieved. Measured peaks averaged 28 mg/L for twice-daily dosing and 40-45 mg/L for once-daily dosing; troughs averaged 5 and 1-2 mg/L, respectively. Fifteen of the included studies reported rates of nephrotoxicity; auditory and vestibular toxicities were reported in 12 and 8 studies. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found little published evidence to support an optimal dosage regimen or TDM targets for amikacin therapy. The use of alternative approaches, such as consensus opinion and a review of current practice, will be required to develop guidelines to maximize therapeutic outcomes and minimize toxicity with amikacin.