The impact of epidural ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine for labor analgesia on maternal and fetal outcomes: a meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Newer neuraxial local anesthetic agents which have been used as epidural analgesia have shown to provide reliable pain relief during labor. Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine are newer agents now used for labor analgesia. However, even though few studies have made their comparison with bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine have seldom systematically been compared. Therefore, in this analysis, we aimed to systematically show the impact of epidural ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine for labor analgesia on maternal and fetal outcomes. METHODS: http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov , Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane database and Google Scholar were searched for studies comparing ropivacaine versus levobupivacaine for labor analgesia. Maternal and fetal outcomes were considered as the endpoints in this analysis. The RevMan software 5.4 was used to analyze data in this study. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to represent the data post analysis. RESULTS: A total number of 2062 participants were included in this analysis whereby 1054 participants were assigned to ropivacaine and 1008 participants were assigned to levobupivacaine. The main results of this analysis showed that epidural ropivacaine was not associated with significantly higher risk of hypotension (RR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.43 - 1.17; P = 0.18) and pruritus (RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.89 - 1.42; P = 0.34) when compared to levobupivacaine for labor analgesia. However, the risk of nausea and vomiting was significantly higher with ropivacaine (RR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.05 - 2.44; P = 0.03). Spontaneous vaginal delivery (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.89 - 1.42; P = 0.83), instrumental vaginal delivery (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.89 - 1.45; P = 0.32) and the risk for cesarean section (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.42 - 1.37; P = 0.35) were not significantly different. When fetal outcomes were assessed, Apgar score < 7 at 1 min (RR: 1.01: 95% CI: 0.57 - 1.80; P = 0.97), abnormality of fetal heart rate (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.55 - 3.79; P = 0.45) and neonatal asphyxia (RR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.10 - 1.18; P = 0.09) were also similarly manifested. CONCLUSIONS: To conclude, our analysis showed both epidural ropivacaine and levobupivacaine to be equally effective for labor analgesia in terms of maternal and fetal outcomes. No major adverse maternal and fetal outcome was observed in this analysis. However, considering the several limitations of this analysis, further larger studies should be able to solve and clarify this issue.

Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between vaginal birth after cesarean section and normal vaginal birth.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) with those of normal vaginal birth (NVB) in a tertiary hospital in China. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 1,024 women who birthed vaginally between January 2019 and December 2020. The VBAC group (n = 512) included women with one previous cesarean, while the NVB group (n = 512) had no previous caesareans. All women used epidural analgesia. We assessed maternal and neonatal complications using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0. RESULTS: The VBAC group had an 87.5% success rate for vaginal birth under epidural analgesia, whereas the NVB group had a 100% success rate. A primary focus of the study was uterine rupture. Vaginal birth after cesarean was associated with a higher incidence of uterine rupture (0.8% vs 0%, p = 0.031), postpartum hemorrhage (6.6% vs 3.5%, p = 0.021) and the need for blood transfusions (2.7% vs 0.8%, p = 0.012) compared with NVB. There were no substantial differences in maternal infections, wound infections or perineal lacerations between the groups. Although neonatal outcomes were generally similar, the VBAC group experienced higher rates of 5-minute Apgar scores <7 (2.3% vs 0.6%, p = 0.009) and admissions to neonatal intensive care units (3.1% vs 1.2%, p = 0.016 Even after adjusting for confounders, VBAC remained an independent risk factor for several complications. CONCLUSION: Although VBAC is feasible and mostly safe, it is associated with a higher risk of specific complications compared with NVB. Careful selection of candidates and close monitoring are essential for optimizing outcomes in VBAC cases.

Influencing factors of intrapartum fever after epidural labor analgesia.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate factors influencing intrapartum fever in parturients receiving epidural labor analgesia. METHODS: This study included 410 parturients who received epidural labor analgesia at the authors' hospital between February 2022 and February 2024. Participants were divided into a fever group (>37.5℃) and a control group (<37.5℃) based on their body temperature post-analgesia. General data, gestational comorbidities, and intrapartum-related conditions were compared. Influencing factors were analyzed using the chi-squared test and logistic regression. RESULTS: Intrapartum fever occurred in 90 parturients (22.0%). Univariate analysis indicated that maternal age (p=0.046), parity (p=0.042), oxytocin use (p=0.041), and timing of analgesia (p<0.001) were associated with intrapartum fever. Multivariate analysis revealed that the timing of analgesia (OR 3.612, 95%CI 1.533-8.510) and amniotic fluid contamination degrees I (OR 1.072, 95%CI 1.012-3.082) and II (OR 2.874, 95%CI 1.901-9.092) were independent risk factors. No significant differences were found between the fever and control groups in body mass index, gestational age, gestational comorbidities, and artificial membrane rupture (p>0.05). Intrapartum fever increased the rate of neonatal fever within 2 h after birth (41.7 vs 18.6%, p<0.05) but did not significantly affect other neonatal health indicators. CONCLUSION: Timing of analgesia and amniotic fluid contamination are significant factors influencing intrapartum fever in parturients receiving epidural labor analgesia.

Safety and efficacy of high thoracic epidural analgesia for chest wall surgery in young adolescents: A retrospective cohort analysis and a new standardised definition for success rate.

BACKGROUND: Chest wall surgery for the correction of pectus excavatum or pectus carinatum has gained increased interest in recent years. Adequate pain treatment, respiratory physiotherapy and early ambulation are key to improving the outcomes. Although thoracic epidural analgesia is highly effective, its safety is controversial, leading to extensive scrutiny and questioning of its role. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesise that thoracic epidural analgesia is effective and well tolerated to use in adolescents, with a high success rate and low pain scores. DESIGN: Observational retrospective cohort study. SETTING: All adolescent cases in a high-volume academic tertiary chest wall surgery centre between March 1993 and December 2017 were included. PATIENTS: A total of 1117 patients aged from 12 to 19 years of age and receiving either Ravvitch, Nuss or Abramson chest wall reconstruction for pectus excavatum were identified in our institutional chest wall surgery database. After applying selection and exclusion criteria, 532 patients were included in the current analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint of this study was the safety of epidural analgesia, assessed by the incidence of acute adverse events. Secondary endpoints were block success rates using a specific novel definition, and analgesic efficacy using recorded postoperative pain scores. RESULTS: More than 60% of patients experienced one or more adverse events. However, all events were minor and without consequences. No serious or long-term adverse events were detected. The success rate of thoracic epidural placement was 81%. Low postoperative pain scores were observed. CONCLUSION: Thoracic epidural analgesia is an extremely effective pain control technique, with a surprisingly high number of minor adverse events but safe with regard to serious adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The local research ethics committee approved and registered this study on 16 May 2022 (registration number: S66594).

Immunological effects of post-operative epidural analgesia versus oral opioids in VATS.

INTRODUCTION: Anaesthetic choices in cancer surgery, including the use of epidural analgesia, may affect immune function during the perioperative period and might play an important role in subsequent cancer spread and recurrence. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blinded, single-centre study allocating patients scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy to post-operative pain management using either thoracic epidural analgesia or oral morphine. We compared pre-, per-, and post-operative plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-12, and interferon (IFN)-γ using regression analysis, and conducted a two-year survival follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients were randomised. Fifty-six received the allocated treatment and were analysed. None of the investigated cytokines exhibited significant between-group differences in plasma concentrations when adjusted for the chosen covariates (p ≥ 0.204). A two-year follow-up showed no difference in survival between the two groups (p = 0.5). CONCLUSION: Our study found no differences in the impact on the innate, non-specific immune system related to epidural analgesia for pain management in VATS. FUNDING: The Danish Cancer Society (R150-A10139). Oberstinde Kirsten Jensa la Cours Mindelegat (JSP-25076). University of Southern Denmark, Region of Southern Denmark and Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02359175 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Upper back, neck, and shoulder pain during labor epidural analgesia: a quality improvement initiative.

BACKGROUND: Severe upper back/interscapular, neck and shoulder pain during labor epidural analgesia (PLEA) is not uncommon. The objective of this quality initiative was to evaluate the incidence, demographic associations and management of PLEA. METHODS: An eight-month, single-center quality improvement initiative was performed for the detection and management of PLEA. After survey-based consensus among obstetric anaesthetist attendings and fellows, a three-step PLEA treatment protocol with interventions and numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 - 10 scale) pain assessments was introduced. Demographic data and outcomes were compared among parturients with and without PLEA. RESULTS: Among 2888 women who received labor epidural analgesia from October 2022 through May 2023, 36 (1.2% [95% CI 0.9% to 1.7%]) reported PLEA. Women with PLEA were younger, more likely to be nulliparous, and had a higher body mass index (BMI) than women without PLEA (p < 0.05 for all). A total of 72.2% (26/36) of women with PLEA received at least one protocol treatment. Twenty-three women received first-line therapy, with pain relief in 91.3% (21/23). The median NRS score decreased from 9 [IQR 8-10] to 3 [1-4]. Women with PLEA had a higher incidence of cesarean delivery (CD) and a longer interval between epidural placement and delivery; 52.8 vs. 17.5% (p < 0.001) and 16.5 vs. 6.9 hours (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PLEA was higher than previously reported. Patients with PLEA were younger, more commonly nulliparous, had higher BMI, longer epidural infusion times and higher CD rates. A three-step treatment protocol was successful in managing PLEA.

Pocket warming of bupivacaine with fentanyl to shorten onset of labor epidural analgesia: A double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

Shortening analgesic onset has been researched and it has been documented that prewarming epidural medications to body temperature (37°C) prior to administration increases medication efficacy. Our double-blind randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate if a lower degree of prewarming in providers' pockets could achieve similar results without the need of a bedside incubator. A total of 136 parturients were randomized into either the pocket-warmed group or the room temperature group to receive 10 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine with 2 µg/mL fentanyl epidural bolus at either the 27.8 ±1.7°C or 22.1 ±1.0°C temperatures, respectively. Primary outcome, time to analgesic onset (verbal rating scale pain score ≤ 3) was recorded in 0-, 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 30-, and 60-minutes intervals. It was observed that the pocket-warming group (n = 64) and room temperature group (n = 72) had no significant difference of analgesic onset time (median 8 vs. 6.2 minutes; p = 0.322). The incidence of adverse events such as hypotension, fever (≥ 38°C), nausea, vomiting, and number of top-off epidural boluses, as well as patient satisfaction rates and mode of delivery, were not significantly different between the groups as well. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and explore the impact of different temperatures on analgesic onset time as well as the logistical issues associated with their clinical implementations.

The effectiveness and outcomes of epidural analgesia in patients undergoing open liver resection: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Open liver resection necessitates a substantial upper abdominal inverted-L incision, resulting in severe pain and compromising patient recovery. Despite the efficacy of epidural analgesia in providing adequate postoperative analgesia, the potential epidural-related adverse effects should be carefully considered. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of continuous epidural analgesia and intravenous analgesia in open liver resection. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, collecting data from patients who underwent open liver resection between 2007 and 2017. Propensity score matching was implemented to mitigate confounding variables, with patients being matched in a 1:1 ratio based on propensity scores. The primary outcome was the comparison of postoperative morphine consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative outcomes, and epidural-related adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 612 patients were included, and after matching, there were 204 patients in each group. Opioid consumption at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively was statistically lower in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in pain scores (p = 0.422). Additionally, perioperative hypotension requiring treatment, as well as nausea and vomiting, were significantly higher in the epidural analgesia group compared to the intravenous analgesia group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia is superior to intravenous morphine in terms of reducing postoperative opioid consumption within the initial 72 h after open liver resection. Nevertheless, perioperative hypotension, which necessitates management, should be approached with consideration and vigilance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ , NCT number: NCT06301932.

Epidural Analgesia During Labor and Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.

Importance: Epidural analgesia is used by approximately 70% of birthing persons in the US to alleviate labor pain and is a common cause of elevated temperature in the birthing parent during labor, which, in turn, is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes such as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Objective: To determine whether epidural analgesia is associated with increased risk of HIE after adjusting for the birthing person's maximal temperature before epidural placement and for the propensity to get an epidural. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted at 15 Kaiser Permanente Northern California hospitals. Participants included singleton neonates born at 35 weeks' or later gestational age between 2012 and 2019. Elective cesarean deliveries and deliveries within 2 hours of hospital admission were excluded. Data analysis was performed from November 2022 to June 2024. Exposure: The primary exposure was epidural analgesia during labor. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was HIE, defined as the presence of both neonatal acidosis (ie, pH <7 or base deficit ≥10) and encephalopathy. The presence and timing of epidural analgesia and demographic, pregnancy, and labor characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records. A propensity score for receiving epidural analgesia was created including demographic variables and comorbidities predating epidural placement. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between epidural analgesia and HIE, adjusting for maximal birthing parent's temperature before epidural placement and the propensity for receiving an epidural. Results: Among 233 056 infants born at 35 weeks' or later gestational age by vaginal or unplanned cesarean delivery after at least 2 hours of in-hospital labor, 177 603 (76%) were exposed to epidural analgesia and 439 (0.19%) had HIE. On unadjusted analysis, epidural analgesia was associated with an increased risk of maximal temperature greater than 38 °C during labor (risk ratio [RR], 8.58; 95% CI, 8.06-9.14). Each degree increase in maximal temperature during labor was associated with nearly triple the odds of HIE (odds ratio [OR], 2.82; 95% CI, 2.51-3.17). However, there was no significant association between epidural analgesia and the risk of HIE either on crude (RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96-1.53) or adjusted (adjusted OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.17) analyses. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study including more than 230 000 parent-infant dyads, epidural analgesia was associated with increased maximal temperature during labor, a known risk factor for HIE. However, epidural analgesia was not associated with increased odds of HIE.

Nurses' perception of epidural services in a Johannesburg academic setting.

BACKGROUND:  Labour pain is associated with detrimental maternal and foetal physical and psychological effects. Labour analgesia is a basic right for all women and labour epidural analgesia has been accepted as the gold standard for providing such, with reported improvement in patient satisfaction. In South Africa, studies have shown that labour epidural rates are low. At an academic hospital in Johannesburg, a 24-h labour epidural service combined with an awareness campaign and educational programme (LEAP) was initiated with the aim of improving labour epidural rates. Results showed a short-lived uptake with a subsequent decline. OBJECTIVES:  This study explored the experiences of labour ward nursing staff regarding the labour epidural service at this academic hospital including perceived limitations and possible recommendations regarding improving service provision. METHOD:  A qualitative, descriptive and exploratory study was conducted. Purposive sampling was used with semistructured, audio-recorded individual interviews, thematic analysis was performed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach. RESULTS:  The key theme is required education and supervision of epidural insertion (see page 3), management of childbirth and challenges related to epidural service provision. CONCLUSION:  A positive sentiment was expressed by the participants; however, deficiencies in the service such as shortages of experienced personnel, work constraints and insufficient training may be affecting service sustainability. Further studies are recommended to form guidance towards the development and implementation of interventions to improve service delivery.Contribution: Provision of continual training and increased staffing of healthcare personnel will help improve the sustainability of the labour epidural service.

Dose-response of epidural ropivacaine with 0.4†µg†mL-1 of dexmedetomidine for labor analgesia: A prospective double-blinded study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that the ideal dose of epidural dexmedetomidine is 0.4 µg mL-1 for epidural labor analgesia. However, the appropriate dose of ropivacaine when combined with 0.4 µg mL-1 of dexmedetomidine for epidural labor analgesia is still unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the dose-response of ropivacaine when using 0.4 µg mL-1 of dexmedetomidine as epidural adjuvant for labor analgesia. METHODS: One hundred of nulliparous singleton pregnant patients were randomized allocated into 1 of 5 groups with epidural ropivacaine concentration of 0.05%, 0.0625%, 0.075%, 0.0875%, and 0.1%. Labor analgesia was initialed with 12 mL of the mixed study solution. Effective analgesia was defined as a visual analogue scale <10 mm 30 minutes after the initial epidural bolus. The EC50 and EC95 for epidural ropivacaine was calculated by probit regression. RESULTS: Ninety-three of parturients were involved into the final analysis. Totals of 63.2% (12/19), 73.7% (14/19), 88.9% (16/18), 94.7% (18/19), and 100% (18/18) of parturients in group 0.05, 0.0625, 0.075, 0.0875, and 0.1 received effective epidural labor analgesia. The calculated EC50 and EC95 of epidural ropivacaine were 0.046% (95% CI 0.028-0.054%) and 0.086% (95% CI 0.074-0.137%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Under the condition of the study, a bolus of 12 mL ropivacaine 0.086% and dexmedetomidine 0.4 µg mL-1 could afford 95% of nulliparous singleton pregnant patients without suffering labor pain after a test dose of lidocaine 45 mg.

Effect of different concentrations of sufentanil combined with ropivacaine on epidural fever during labor: A single-center retrospective study.

Labor epidural analgesia (LEA) is associated with increased maternal body temperature; however, the responsible mechanism is unknown. Recent studies suggest that changes in EA affect the incidence of fever and that epidural sufentanil supplementation enhances analgesia and reduces the amount of local anesthetic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of sufentanil combined with ropivacaine on intrapartum fever during delivery. We performed a retrospective study comparing maternal fever rates in patients receiving labor analgesia between December 2018 and January 2019. Each patient receiving different concentrations of sufentanil in their EA received either proposal H (0.08% ropivacaine + 0.4 µg/mL sufentanil) or proposal L (0.08% ropivacaine + 0.2 µg/mL sufentanil), with the same nulliparous status. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of intrapartum maternal fever, which was defined as any temperature ≥ 38°C during labor using Fisher exact test. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, birth events, and neonatal outcomes. We observed a perinatal fever incidence rate of 11.7% in the group receiving proposal L, while the incidence rate was 19.8% in the group receiving proposal H (P = .001). Five hours after administration, the average body temperature of the puerpera decreased significantly in the proposal L group compared with proposal H group. In addition, treatment with 0.2 µg/mL sufentanil provided satisfactory pain relief during labor, shortened the first stage of labor and total labor time, reduced oxytocin use, and had no significant adverse effects on neonatal outcomes. EA may increase the risk of intrapartum epidural-associated fever. Compared with the 0.4 µg/mL sufentanil group, the 0.2 µg/mL sufentanil group can provide better analgesia and improve maternal fever. These retrospective results highlighted the importance of prospective and mechanistic studies of maternal fever associated with intraspinal analgesia.

Neuraxial labor analgesia in a parturient with carnitine palmitoyl transferase type II deficiency: a case report.

Carnitine Palmitoyl Transferase Type II (CPT II) deficiency is a disorder of fatty acid beta oxidation that causes decreased adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and ketone production during periods of fasting or high energy requirements. Labor and delivery can precipitate attacks for parturients with this disorder, causing hypoglycemia, muscle weakness, rhabdomyolysis, and kidney failure. Anesthetic management considers the delivery mode and anesthetic medications available to reduce these risks. We present the case of a pregnant patient with CPT II deficiency with labor epidural analgesia and a vaginal delivery, with alternative plans had a different delivery mode been required.

90% effective volume of 0.1% ropivacaine combined with 0.4 µg/ml sufentanil for epidural labour analgesia with push pump at a rate of 400 mL/hr and a bolus interval of 30 min: a double-blind sequential dose-finding study.

BACKGROUND: It was reported that either shorter programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) intervals or high-speed bolus can produce more extensive epidural spread. We hypothesized that a combination of shortened time interval and increased speed of epidural bolus might further improve analgesic effect and therefore reduce the hourly volume for epidural labour analgesia. METHODS: This double-blind dose-finding study used a biased coin up-and-down sequential allocation method to determine the 90% effective bolus volume of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil while using the push pump at a rate of 400 mL/hr and interval of 30 min to provide effective analgesia without breakthrough pain. We used 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.4 µg/mL sufentanil, with bolus volumes ranging from 3 to 6 mL. The first patient was assigned a volume of 3 mL, and the remaining volumes were assigned according to the biased coin-up-and-down method. RESULTS: The estimated 90% effective volume (EV90) of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural labour analgesia at a time interval of 30 min was 4.88 mL (95% confidence interval 4.83-5.38). CONCLUSIONS: The optimum bolus volume of ropivacaine with sufentanil while using push pump at a time interval of 30 min is approximately 5 mL. It could probably further reduce the hourly bolus volume for epidural labour analgesia.

The Influence of Analgesic Wound Infiltration on Postoperative Pain and Inflammatory Cytokines in Open Colorectal Surgery: A Randomized Comparative Pilot Study.

Background and Objectives: Surgical wound analgesia has been analyzed in many studies, but few have focused on its relationship with inflammatory markers. As such, we aimed to determine the influence of analgesic surgical wound infiltration in open colorectal surgery on the seric levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory markers and the associated efficacy in postoperative pain control. Materials and Methods: Forty patients who underwent open colorectal surgery were prospectively randomized: group 0, epidural analgesia; group 1, intravenous analgesia (control), group 2, preincision and prelaparoraphy infiltration; and, group 3, prelaparoraphy infiltration. Wound infiltration was performed with ropivacaine. We analyzed the levels of IL-6 and IL-10 cytokines before and 6 h after surgery and their correlation with pain scores. Results: The postoperative Il-6 levels were significantly lower in group 0 than in the control (p = 0.041). The postoperative Il-10 levels were significantly higher in group 3 (p = 0.029) than in the control. Six hours after the operation, the pain scores were significantly lower in all groups than in the control (p = 0.005, p = 0.022, and p = 0.017 for groups 0, 2, and 3, respectively). Pain scores were significantly correlated with Il-10 levels in group 2 (p = 0.047); in group 3, IL-10 levels directly correlated with those of Il-6 (p = 0.026). Conclusions: The analgetic effect of preincisional and prelaparoraphy analgetic infiltration was efficient. The analgetic infiltration of the surgical wound prior to closure stimulates both the inflammatory activator and regulator interleukins.

Efficacy of locoregional analgesic techniques after laparotomy for gynecologic cancer: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine which locoregional techniques are effective in managing post-operative pain in major open oncologic gynecologic surgery in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption when epidural analgesia is not a feasible option. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature, based on the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted. The ROB-2 assessment was used to assess bias. The primary outcomes were opioid consumption and post-operative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included post-operative markers such as time to mobilization and bowel movement. RESULTS: A total of nine studies (n=714) were included in the analysis. Eight studies had a low risk of bias. Five different forms of locoregional analgesia were described. Eight studies compared with placebo and one study compared rectus sheath block with epidural analgesia. Three of the five studies investigating transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks showed an improvement in pain scores and opioid consumption when compared with the placebo group. One study investigating rectus sheath blocks and another investigating paravertebral blocks demonstrated significantly less opioid consumption and improved pain scores at certain time points. The studies investigating continuous wound infiltration and superior hypogastric plexus block found no significant effect. No adverse effects of locoregional anesthesia were found. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that TAP blocks, rectus sheath blocks, and paravertebral blocks may decrease opioid consumption and improve pain scores in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery for gynecologic cancer. Additionally, these techniques might serve as a viable alternative for patients with contraindications to epidural analgesia.

Impact of nitrous oxide use on parturient recall of neuraxial analgesia risks.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Nitrous oxide affects memory and recall. We aimed to determine if using nitrous oxide during labor affected patients' ability to learn and recall the risks and benefits of neuraxial analgesia. DESIGN: Single-center, prospective cohort study. SETTING: Labor and delivery unit in a large academic medical center. PATIENTS: Nulliparous patients with spontaneous or planned induction of labor. INTERVENTIONS: Parturients chose whether to use nitrous oxide during labor. At the discussion for epidural consent, 4 risks were described: headache, infection, nerve damage, bleeding. MEASUREMENTS: Labor pain score, time from nitrous oxide discontinuation, and cervical dilation were documented at the discussion of epidural risks. Patients were assessed for unprompted recall and prompted recall of epidural risks on postpartum day 1 and unprompted recall at postpartum week 6. The number and proportion of patients who indicated each true risk (unprompted and prompted recall) or distractor (prompted recall only) were summarized by treatment group and results compared using Pearson χ2 tests. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 403 enrolled patients, 294 (73%) did not use nitrous oxide, and 109 (27%) did. The 2 groups were similar except women who used nitrous oxide were more likely to be cared for by midwives and had higher pain scores at their epidural request. Scores for unprompted or prompted recall of epidural risks were not different between women who received or did not receive nitrous oxide. All 4 risks were recalled unprompted by only 3% in the nitrous oxide group and by 6% in the group not receiving nitrous oxide (P = .18). CONCLUSIONS: The use of nitrous oxide for labor analgesia does not adversely influence a parturient's ability to recall the risks of epidural placement. Patients who receive nitrous oxide for labor analgesia should be considered eligible to provide consent for subsequent procedures.

Postoperative pain management after thoracic transplantations.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart and lung transplantation evolution marked significant milestones. Pioneering efforts of Dr Christiaan Barnard with the first successful heart transplant in 1967, followed by advancements in heart-lung and single-lung transplants by Drs Bruce Reitz, Norman Shumway, and Joel Cooper laid the groundwork for contemporary organ transplantation, offering hope for patients with end-stage heart and pulmonary diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: Pretransplant opioid use in heart transplant recipients is linked to higher mortality and opioid dependence posttransplant. Effective pain control is crucial to reduce opioid-related adverse effects and enhance recovery. However, research on specific pain management protocols for heart transplant recipients is limited. In lung transplantation effective pain management is crucial. Studies emphasize the benefits of multimodal strategies, including thoracic epidural analgesia and thoracic paravertebral blocks, to enhance recovery and reduce opioid use. Perioperative pain control challenges in lung transplantation are unique and necessitate careful consideration to prevent complications and improve outcomes. SUMMARY: This review emphasizes the importance of tailored pain management in heart and lung transplant recipients. It advocates for extended follow-up and alternative analgesics to minimize opioid dependency and enhance quality of life. Further high-quality research is needed to optimize postoperative analgesia and improve patient outcomes.