RESUMEN
The reporting of incidents has a long association with safety in healthcare and anaesthesia, yet many incident reporting systems substantially under-report critical events. Better understanding the underlying reasons for low levels of critical incident reporting can allow such factors to be addressed systematically to arrive at a better reporting culture. However, new forms of automation in anaesthesia also provide powerful new approaches to be adopted in the future.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Automatización , Seguridad del Paciente , Gestión de Riesgos , Humanos , Gestión de Riesgos/métodos , Anestesiología , Anestesia/normas , Anestesia/métodos , Mejoramiento de la CalidadRESUMEN
Safely anesthetizing patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) can be intimidating, particularly for novice anesthesia providers. Given the variety of complex issues anesthesia providers may encounter with patients, it would be impractical to expect expertise in every population. To combat the inevitable loss of knowledge, education experts recommend active learning techniques, including test-enhanced learning, active recall, and spaced repetition. To that end, this research team created an LVAD Assessment for Anesthesia, or LAmA tool, to be evaluated for content validity by eight experts. The LAmA tool and content validity assessment were distributed to two anesthesiologists and four nurse anesthetists in the cardiothoracic anesthesia department at a hospital in Northeast Ohio, as well as to two outside nursing research experts. Results were analyzed by the research team and the content validity index (CVI) was determined. A CVI of at least 0.875 was required for the tool to be valid, and final scores in the categories of relevance, clarity, and importance were all ≥ 0.9. The data from the validated tool were used to create a pocket reference on LVAD anesthetic management. Both educational assessments and pocket references have the potential to positively impact knowledge retention and patient outcomes, making them excellent clinical resources.
Asunto(s)
Corazón Auxiliar , Enfermeras Anestesistas , Humanos , Enfermeras Anestesistas/educación , Anestesia/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Competencia Clínica/normasRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review explores the intricacies of ethical anesthesia, exploring the necessity for precision anesthesia and its impact on patient-reported outcomes. The primary objective is to advocate for a defined aim, promoting the implementation of rules and feedback systems. The ultimate goal is to enhance precision anesthesia care, ensuring patient safety through the implementation of a teamwork and the integration of feedback mechanisms. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent strategies in the field of anesthesia have evolved from intraoperative monitorization to a wider perioperative patient-centered precision care. Nonetheless, implementing this approach encounters significant obstacles. The article explores the evidence supporting the need for a defined aim and applicable rules for precision anesthesia's effectiveness. The implementation of the safety culture is underlined. The review delves into the teamwork description with structured feedback systems. SUMMARY: Anesthesia is a multifaceted discipline that involves various stakeholders. The primary focus is delivering personalized precision care. This review underscores the importance of establishing clear aims, defined rules, and fostering effective and well tolerated teamwork with accurate feedback for improving patient-reported outcomes. The Safe Brain Initiative approach, emphasizing algorithmic monitoring and systematic follow-up, is crucial in implementing a fundamental and standardized reporting approach within patient-centered anesthesia care practice.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Humanos , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/normas , Anestesia/ética , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/ética , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/normas , Anestesiología/ética , Anestesiología/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/ética , Medicina de Precisión/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/ética , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/normasRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Given the rapid growth of nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) in recent years, it is essential to review its unique challenges as well as strategies for patient selection and care optimization. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent investigations have uncovered an increasing prevalence of older and higher ASA physical status patients in NORA settings. Although closed claim data regarding patient injury demonstrate a lower proportion of NORA cases resulting in a claim than traditional operating room cases, NORA cases have an increased risk of claim for death. Challenges within NORA include site-specific differences, limitations in ergonomic design, and increased stress among anesthesia providers. Several authors have thus proposed strategies focusing on standardizing processes, site-specific protocols, and ergonomic improvements to mitigate risks. SUMMARY: Considering the unique challenges of NORA settings, meticulous patient selection, risk stratification, and preoperative optimization are crucial. Embracing data-driven strategies and leveraging technological innovations (such as artificial intelligence) is imperative to refine quality control methods in targeted areas. Collaborative efforts led by anesthesia providers will ensure personalized, well tolerated, and improved patient outcomes across all phases of NORA care.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Selección de Paciente , Humanos , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/normas , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Ergonomía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many serious adverse events in anaesthesia are retrospectively rated as preventable. Anonymous reporting of near misses to a critical incident reporting system (CIRS) can identify structural weaknesses and improve quality, but incidents are often underreported. METHODS: This prospective qualitative study aimed to identify conceptions of a CIRS and reasons for underreporting at a single Swiss centre. Anaesthesia cases were screened to identify critical airway-related incidents that qualified to be reported to the CIRS. Anaesthesia providers involved in these incidents were individually interviewed. Factors that prevented or encouraged reporting of critical incidents to the CIRS were evaluated. Interview data were analysed using the Framework method. RESULTS: Of 3668 screened airway management procedures, 101 cases (2.8%) involved a critical incident. Saturation was reached after interviewing 21 anaesthesia providers, who had been involved in 42/101 critical incidents (41.6%). Only one incident (1.0%) had been reported to the CIRS, demonstrating significant underreporting. Interviews revealed highly variable views on the aims of the CIRS with an overall high threshold for reporting a critical incident. Factors hindering reporting of cases included concerns regarding identifiability of the reported incident and involved healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS: Methods to foster anonymity of reporting, such as by national rather than departmental critical incident reporting system databases, and a change in culture is required to enhance reporting of critical incidents. Institutions managing a critical incident reporting system need to ensure timely feedback to the team regarding lessons learned, consequences, and changes to standards of care owing to reported critical incidents. Consistent reporting and assessment of critical incidents is required to allow the full potential of a critical incident reporting system.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Investigación Cualitativa , Gestión de Riesgos , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Gestión de Riesgos/métodos , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/normas , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/métodos , Manejo de la Vía Aérea/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Suiza , Potencial Evento Adverso/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) represents a timely and significant advancement. As the demand for NORA services expands, the application of AI is poised to improve patient selection, perioperative care, and anesthesia delivery. This review examines AI's growing impact on NORA and how it can optimize our clinical practice in the near future. RECENT FINDINGS: AI has already improved various aspects of anesthesia, including preoperative assessment, intraoperative management, and postoperative care. Studies highlight AI's role in patient risk stratification, real-time decision support, and predictive modeling for patient outcomes. Notably, AI applications can be used to target patients at risk of complications, alert clinicians to the upcoming occurrence of an intraoperative adverse event such as hypotension or hypoxemia, or predict their tolerance of anesthesia after the procedure. Despite these advances, challenges persist, including ethical considerations, algorithmic bias, data security, and the need for transparent decision-making processes within AI systems. SUMMARY: The findings underscore the substantial benefits of AI in NORA, which include improved safety, efficiency, and personalized care. AI's predictive capabilities in assessing hypoxemia risk and other perioperative events, have demonstrated potential to exceed human prognostic accuracy. The implications of these findings advocate for a careful yet progressive adoption of AI in clinical practice, encouraging the development of robust ethical guidelines, continual professional training, and comprehensive data management strategies. Furthermore, AI's role in anesthesia underscores the need for multidisciplinary research to address the limitations and fully leverage AI's capabilities for patient-centered anesthesia care.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Inteligencia Artificial , Humanos , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/normas , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Anestesiología/métodos , Selección de PacienteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In this project, we sought to develop and implement pediatric anesthesia metrics into electronic health records (EHR) in a hospital setting to improve quality and safety of patient care. While there has been an upsurge in metric-driven health care, specific metrics catering to pediatric anesthesia remain lacking despite widespread use of EHR. The rapid proliferation and implementation of EHR presents opportunities to develop and implement metrics appropriate to local patient care, in this case pediatric anesthesia, with the strategic goal of enhancing quality and safety of patient care, while also delivering transparency in reporting of such metrics. CLINICAL FEATURES: Using a quasi-nominal consensus group design, we collected requirements from attending anesthesiologists using Agile methodology. Forty-five metrics addressing quality of care (e.g., induction experience, anesthesia delivery, unanticipated events, and postanesthetic care unit stay) and provider performance (e.g., bundle-compliance, collaboration, skills assurance) were developed. Implementation involved integration into the EHR followed by transition from PDF-based feedback to interactive Power BI (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) dashboards. CONCLUSION: We introduced and implemented customized pediatric anesthesia metrics within an academic pediatric hospital; however, this framework is easily adaptable across multiple clinical specialties and institutions. In harnessing data-collecting and reporting properties of EHR, the metrics we describe provide insights that facilitate real-time monitoring and foster a culture of continuous learning in line with strategic goals of high-reliability organizations.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Dans le cadre de ce projet, nous avons cherché à développer et à mettre en Åuvre des mesures d'anesthésie pédiatrique dans les dossiers de santé électroniques (DSE) en milieu hospitalier afin d'améliorer la qualité et la sécurité des soins aux patient·es. Bien qu'il y ait eu une recrudescence des soins de santé guidés par les procédures d'évaluation, les mesures spécifiques à l'anesthésie pédiatrique restent insuffisantes malgré l'utilisation généralisée du DSE. La prolifération et la mise en Åuvre rapides des DSE offrent des possibilités d'élaborer et de mettre en Åuvre des paramètres appropriés aux soins locaux aux patient·es, dans ce cas-ci en anesthésie pédiatrique, dans le but stratégique d'améliorer la qualité et la sécurité des soins tout en assurant la transparence des communications concernant ces paramètres. CARACTéRISTIQUES CLINIQUES: À l'aide d'un modèle de groupe consensuel quasi nominal, nous avons recueilli les exigences des anesthésiologistes traitant·es à l'aide de la méthodologie Agile. Quarante-cinq paramètres portant sur la qualité des soins (p. ex., l'expérience d'induction, l'administration de l'anesthésie, les événements imprévus et le séjour en salle de réveil) et la productivité des prestataires (p. ex., l'observance des forfaits, la collaboration, l'assurance des compétences) ont été élaborés. La mise en Åuvre a impliqué l'intégration dans le DSE, suivie de la transition des commentaires en format PDF vers les tableaux de bord interactifs Power BI (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, États-Unis). CONCLUSION: Nous avons introduit et mis en Åuvre des mesures personnalisées de l'anesthésie pédiatrique au sein d'un hôpital pédiatrique universitaire. Cependant, ce cadre est facilement adaptable à de multiples spécialités cliniques et institutions. Parce qu'elles exploitent les propriétés de collecte de données et de communications du DSE, les mesures que nous décrivons fournissent des informations qui facilitent la surveillance en temps réel et favorisent une culture d'apprentissage continu conforme aux objectifs stratégiques des organisations à haute fiabilité.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Hospitales Pediátricos/organización & administración , Canadá , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/normas , Niño , Anestesiología/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Anestesiólogos/organización & administración , Anestesia PediátricaRESUMEN
Monitoring the patient's physiological functions is critical in clinical anesthesia. The latest version of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists' Guidelines for Safe Anesthesia Monitoring, revised in 2019, covers various factors, including electroencephalogram monitoring, oxygenation, ventilation, circulation, and muscle relaxation. However, with recent advances in monitoring technologies, the information provided has become more detailed, requiring practitioners to update their knowledge. At a symposium organized by the Journal of Anesthesia in 2023, experts across five fields discussed their respective topics: anesthesiologists need to interpret not only the values displayed on processed electroencephalogram monitors but also raw electroencephalogram data in the foreseeable future. In addition to the traditional concern of preventing hypoxemia, monitoring for potential hyperoxemia and the effects of mechanical ventilation itself will become increasingly important. The importance of using AI analytics to predict hypotension, assess nociception, and evaluate microcirculation may increase. With the recent increase in the availability of neuromuscular monitoring devices in Japan, it is important for anesthesiologists to become thoroughly familiar with the features of each device to ensure its effective use. There is a growing desire to develop and introduce a well-organized, integrated "single screen" monitor.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Electroencefalografía , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Humanos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/instrumentación , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/normas , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/normas , Electroencefalografía/métodos , Electroencefalografía/instrumentación , Anestesiología/métodos , Anestesiología/normas , Anestesiología/instrumentación , JapónRESUMEN
Introduction: Preanesthesia teleconsultation helps reduce availability constraints as well as direct and indirect expenses. The TELECAM trial was performed to assess the quality of preanesthesia teleconsultation in terms of clinical parameters evaluation, feasibility, patient satisfaction and preoperative anxiety, and anesthesiologist satisfaction. Methods: TELECAM was an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel group, evaluator-blinded, open-label study. Patients with a scheduled ambulatory surgery (orthopedic or hand surgery) were randomized into the in-person preanesthesia consultation group or the preanesthesia teleconsultation (conducted at the patient's home or workplace) group. The quality of the teleconsultation was evaluated through agreement on intubation difficulty, predictable mask ventilation difficulty, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores between the preanesthesia consultation and the preanesthesia in-person visit. Results: A total of 241 patients were included, and 208 were considered in the analyses. The feasibility of teleconsultation was high, with a feasibility ratio of 87.5%. The quality of the preanesthesia consultation regarding the evaluation of predictable intubation, mask ventilation difficulties, and ASA score, did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.23, 0.29, and 0.06, respectively). The preoperative satisfaction was higher for patients who had a preanesthesia teleconsultation (p = 0.04). Patients' preoperative anxiety did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.90). The median satisfaction of the anesthesiologists who performed the teleconsultation reached a maximum of 10 (IQR: 8.0; 10.0). Conclusion: This study showed positive results for the quality of preanesthesia teleconsultation on the evaluation of clinical parameters, with high feasibility and satisfaction of the patients and anesthesiologists. The trial was registered in ClinicalTrials (NCT03470896).
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción del Paciente , Consulta Remota , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Anciano , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Ansiedad , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Estudios de FactibilidadAsunto(s)
Anestesia , Humanos , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/normas , Anestesiología/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Cataract surgery is one of the most common procedures in outpatient surgery units. The use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in clinical practice and the advent of new health scenarios, such as the Covid pandemic, have driven the development of pre-anaesthesia assessment models that free up resources to improve access to cataract surgery without sacrificing patient safety. The approach to cataract surgery varies considerably among public, subsidised and private hospitals. This raises the need for guidelines to standardise patient assessment, pre-operative tests, management of background medication, patient information and informed consent. RESULTS: In this document, the SEDAR Clinical Management Division together with the Major Outpatient Surgery Division SEDAR Working Group put forward a series of consensus recommendations on pre-anaesthesia testing based on the use of ITCs, health questionnaires, patient information and informed consent supervised and evaluated by an anaesthesiologist. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus document will effectivise pre-anaesthesia assessment in cataract surgery while maintaining the highest standards of quality, safety and legality.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Extracción de Catarata , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Extracción de Catarata/normas , Humanos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/normas , Anestesia/normas , Anestesia/métodos , Consentimiento Informado , COVID-19/prevención & controlRESUMEN
The landscape of ambulatory surgery is changing, and tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy is one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures performed nationally. The number of children undergoing tonsillectomy on an ambulatory basis continues to increase. The 2 most common indications for tonsillectomy are recurrent throat infections and obstructive sleep-disordered breathing. The most frequent early complications after tonsillectomy are hemorrhage and ventilatory compromise. In areas lacking a dedicated children's hospital, these cases are managed by a nonpediatric specialized anesthesiologist and general otolaryngology surgeon. In response to requests from our members without pediatric fellowship training and/or who care for pediatric patients infrequently, the Pediatric Committee of the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA) developed a position statement with recommendations for the safe perioperative care of pediatric patients undergoing tonsillectomy with and without adenoidectomy in freestanding ambulatory surgical facilities. This statement identifies children that are more likely to experience complications and to require additional dedicated provider time that is not conducive to the rapid pace and staffing ratios of many freestanding ambulatory centers with mixed adult and pediatric practices. The aim is to provide health care professionals with practical criteria and suggestions based on the best available evidence. When high-quality evidence is unavailable, we relied on group consensus from pediatric ambulatory specialists in the SAMBA Pediatric Committee. Consensus recommendations were presented to the Pediatric Committee of SAMBA.
Asunto(s)
Adenoidectomía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Anestesia , Sociedades Médicas , Tonsilectomía , Humanos , Tonsilectomía/efectos adversos , Tonsilectomía/normas , Adenoidectomía/efectos adversos , Adenoidectomía/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/normas , Niño , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Anestesia/normas , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapiaRESUMEN
This consensus statement is a comprehensive update of the 2010 Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA) Consensus Statement on perioperative blood glucose management in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing ambulatory surgery. Since the original consensus guidelines in 2010, several novel therapeutic interventions have been introduced to treat DM, including new hypoglycemic agents and increasing prevalence of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors. The updated recommendations were developed by an expert task force under the provision of SAMBA and are based on a comprehensive review of the literature from 1980 to 2022. The task force included SAMBA members with expertise on this topic and those contributing to the primary literature regarding the management of DM in the perioperative period. The recommendations encompass preoperative evaluation of patients with DM presenting for ambulatory surgery, management of preoperative oral hypoglycemic agents and home insulins, intraoperative testing and treatment modalities, and blood glucose management in the postanesthesia care unit and transition to home after surgery. High-quality evidence pertaining to perioperative blood glucose management in patients with DM undergoing ambulatory surgery remains sparse. Recommendations are therefore based on recent guidelines and available literature, including general glucose management in patients with DM, data from inpatient surgical populations, drug pharmacology, and emerging treatment data. Areas in need of further research are also identified. Importantly, the benefits and risks of interventions and clinical practice information were considered to ensure that the recommendations maintain patient safety and are clinically valid and useful in the ambulatory setting. What Other Guidelines Are Available on This Topic? Since the publication of the SAMBA Consensus Statement for perioperative blood glucose management in the ambulatory setting in 2010, several recent guidelines have been issued by the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), the Endocrine Society, the Centre for Perioperative Care (CPOC), and the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland (AAGBI) on DM care in hospitalized patients; however, none are specific to ambulatory surgery. How Does This Guideline Differ From the Previous Guidelines? Previously posed clinical questions that were outdated were revised to reflect current clinical practice. Additional questions were developed relating to the perioperative management of patients with DM to include the newer therapeutic interventions.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Glucemia , Consenso , Diabetes Mellitus , Hipoglucemiantes , Atención Perioperativa , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/normas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Anestesia/normas , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/métodos , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Adulto , Anestesiología/normas , Anestesiología/métodos , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemia/sangre , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemia/prevención & control , Control Glucémico/normasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although most anesthetic drugs are classified as compatible with breastfeeding, literature shows that anesthesia providers routinely advise patients to discard milk when receiving all types of anesthesia. The purpose of this project was to determine if a multimodal educational module and cognitive aid improved student registered nurse anesthetists' knowledge and confidence to counsel lactating patients on current anesthesia-related recommendations. DESIGN: This project used a pre-experimental one-group, pretest and post-test design. METHODS: Preintervention and postintervention surveys measured knowledge and confidence to counsel lactating patients scheduled to receive anesthesia. FINDINGS: Significant improvement in knowledge and confidence after the intervention were noted. CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal educational session and cognitive aid improved student registered nurse anesthetists' knowledge about current anesthesia-related breastfeeding recommendations and their confidence in counseling these patients. Wider use of this educational module with the cognitive aid has the potential to positively impact breastfeeding patients and their children.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Lactancia Materna , Humanos , Lactancia Materna/métodos , Femenino , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/normas , Consejo/métodos , Consejo/normas , Adulto , Enfermeras Anestesistas/educación , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this project was to develop a plan and then implement a process for improving anesthesia delivery at a surgery center in the Southeast United States over a 2-month period. DESIGN: The design of the project was based on utilization of the instrument QoR-15 (Quality of recovery - 15 item questionnaire). This tool is a valid and reliable instrument for the measurement of postoperative outcomes. The QoR-15 includes 15 questions that can each be scored on a 10-point scale. METHODS: Methods included a literature search, collecting pre-assessment data, making phone calls to patients utilizing QoR-15 tool, analyzing data, presenting findings to stakeholders, creating a plan of future anesthesia care adjustments. FINDINGS: The results revealed the following outcome data: a total of 183 postoperative phone calls were successfully performed. The calls were completed on the first postoperative day during the months of July and August 2021. There were 459 total cases during this 2-month period with 113 successful patient contacts (24.6 % successful contact rate). Mean scores of the QoR-15 data for the total population were above 9 for all 15 items. The data was then analyzed according to surgical specialty. The category of moderate pain scores in patients from the General and Ophthalmology surgical specialties were 7.9 and 7.8 respectively. General surgery patients also had one of the highest scores in severe pain with a mean of 8.7. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the leadership team at the ASC received a formal presentation of the results and recommendations for future adjustments that could be potentially implemented in anesthesia care. The benefits of regional anesthesia were suggested to help achieve better patient pain outcomes in both the General and Ophthalmologic surgical populations.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/normas , Femenino , Masculino , Sudeste de Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Adulto , Periodo PosoperatorioRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy is associated with maternal and fetal risks. Several physiologic changes create unique challenges for anesthesiologists. This review highlights physiologic changes of pregnancy and presents clinical recommendations based on recent literature to guide anesthetic management for the pregnant patient undergoing nonobstetric surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Nearly every anesthetic technique has been safely used in pregnant patients. Although it is difficult to eliminate confounding factors, exposure to anesthetics could endanger fetal brain development. Perioperative fetal monitoring decisions require an obstetric consult based on anticipated maternal and fetal concerns. Given the limitations of fasting guidelines, bedside gastric ultrasound is useful in assessing aspiration risk in pregnant patients. Although there is concern about appropriateness of sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal due its binding to progesterone, preliminary literature supports its safety. SUMMARY: These recommendations will equip anesthesiologists to provide safe care for the pregnant patient and fetus undergoing nonobstetric surgery.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Feto , Humanos , Embarazo , Femenino , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/normas , Feto/efectos de los fármacos , Feto/cirugía , Anestésicos/efectos adversos , Anestésicos/administración & dosificación , Monitoreo Fetal/métodos , Monitoreo Fetal/normas , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/efectos adversos , Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Anestesia Obstétrica/efectos adversos , Anestesia Obstétrica/normasRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is an effective, well studied, and often necessary component of gender-affirming care and mitigation of gender dysphoria for transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals. GAS is categorized as chest surgeries, genitourinary surgeries, facial feminization/masculinization, and vocal phonosurgery. Despite increased incidence of GAS during recent years, there is a gap in knowledge and training on perioperative care for TGD patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Our review discusses the relevant anesthetic considerations for the most common GAS, which often involve highly specialized surgical techniques that have unique implications for the anesthesia professional. SUMMARY: Anesthesiology professionals must attend to the surgical and anesthetic nuances of various GAS procedures. However, as many considerations are based on common practice, research is warranted on anesthetic implications and outcomes of GAS.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Disforia de Género , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo , Personas Transgénero , Humanos , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/normas , Cirugía de Reasignación de Sexo/métodos , Femenino , Disforia de Género/cirugía , Masculino , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/normasRESUMEN
Organization of healthcare strongly differs between European countries and results in country-specific requirements in postgraduate medical training. Within the European Union (EU), the European Board of Anaesthesiology has set recommendations of training for the Specialty of Anaesthesiology including standards for Postgraduate Medical Specialist training including a description for providing service in pediatric anesthesia. However, these standards are advisory and not mandatory. Here we aimed to review the current state and associated challenges of pediatric anesthesia training in Europe. We report an important country-specific variability both in training and regulations of practice of pediatric anesthesia in the EU and in the United Kingdom. The requirements for training in pediatric anesthesia varies between nothing specified (Belgium) or providing anesthesia with direct supervision to a minimum of 50 cases below 5 years of age (Germany) to 3-6 month clinical practice in a specialized pediatric hospital (France). Likewise, the regulations for providing anesthesia to children varies from no regulations at all (Belgium) to age specific requirements and centralization of all children below 4 years of age to specified centers (United Kingdom). Officially recognized pediatric anesthesia fellowship programs are not available in most countries of Europe. It remains unclear if and how country-specific differences in pediatric anesthesia training are associated with clinical outcomes in pediatric perioperative care. There is converging interest and support for the establishment of a European pediatric anesthesia curriculum.