RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Conventional supine emergence and prone extubation from general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) are associated with extubation-related adverse events (ERAEs). Given the minimally invasive nature of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as well as the improved ventilation/perfusion matching and easier airway opening in the prone position, we aimed to assess the safety of prone emergence and extubation in patients undergoing ERCP under GEA. METHODS: Totally, 242 eligible patients were recruited and randomized into the supine extubation group (n = 121; supine group) and the prone extubation group (n = 121; prone group). The primary endpoint was the incidence of ERAEs during emergence, including hemodynamic fluctuations, coughing, stridor, and hypoxemia requiring airway maneuvers. The secondary endpoints included the incidence of monitoring disconnections, extubation time, recovery time, room exit time, and post-procedure sore throat. RESULTS: The incidence of ERAEs was significantly lower in the prone group compared with the supine group (8.3% vs 34.7%, OR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.18-0.56; P < 0.001). Moreover, the prone group demonstrated no monitoring disconnections, shorter extubation time and room exit time, faster recovery, and, lower frequency and milder sore throat after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing ERCP under GEA, compared with supine, prone emergence, and extubation had remarkably lower rates of EAREs and better recovery, and can maintain continuous monitoring and improve efficiency.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Endotraqueal , Humanos , Anestesia Endotraqueal/efectos adversos , Anestesia Endotraqueal/métodos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Hemodinámica , Dolor/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a distressing complaint in adults after endotracheal intubation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of topical application of a eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) cream over the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff on the incidence and severity of POST, cough, and hoarseness of voice in adults after surgery. METHODS: In this randomized, placebo-controlled study, adult patients 18 to 65 years old, in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I and II, and of either sex were scheduled to receive 5% EMLA cream (intervention arm) or lubricant gel (placebo-controlled arm) applied over the ETT cuff. POST was graded as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3). A score of ≥2 was considered as significant POST. The incidence of POST at the sixth postoperative hour was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of POST at 0, second, and 24 hours, and the incidence of significant POST (score ≥2). The incidence and severity of postoperative cough and hoarseness of voice were recorded simultaneously. RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients completed the study. The incidence of POST was significantly lower in the EMLA group versus placebo at the sixth postoperative hour (4.9% vs 40.1%; relative risk [RR], 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.29; P < .001); and at 0 hour (74.5% vs 93.1%; RR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.7-0.9; P < .001) and second hour (51.9% vs 84.3%; RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.5-0.75; P < .001) but comparable at 24 hours (1.9% vs 3.9%; RR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.09-2.67; P = .4). The number needed to treat to prevent POST with EMLA cream application was 5 at 0 hour and 3 at the second and sixth hour. The proportion of patients with significant POST over 24 hours were less in the EMLA group (9.8% vs 43.1%; P < .001). The incidence of postoperative cough and hoarseness of voice was significantly less at the 0, second, and sixth hours in the EMLA group, but comparable at 24 hours. The incidence of severe cough (8.8% vs 31.4%; P < .001) and hoarseness of voice (2% vs 7.4%; P < .001) over 24 hours was less in the EMLA group. CONCLUSIONS: The application of EMLA cream over ETT cuff reduces the incidence and severity of POST, cough, and hoarseness of voice in adults after general anesthesia in the early postoperative period compared to lubricant gel.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Endotraqueal , Faringitis , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Combinación Lidocaína y Prilocaína/uso terapéutico , Anestesia Endotraqueal/efectos adversos , Ronquera/diagnóstico , Ronquera/epidemiología , Ronquera/etiología , Tos/diagnóstico , Tos/epidemiología , Tos/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Faringitis/diagnóstico , Faringitis/epidemiología , Faringitis/etiología , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Dolor , LidocaínaRESUMEN
Background: STOP-BANG questionnaire is an established tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) screening. Its utility in predicting difficult airway has not been evaluated. We intend to assess difficulty in airway management and associated perioperative complications in patients with undiagnosed OSA using the STOP-BANG questionnaire. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective observational study on 250 patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class I-II, aged 18-65 years STOP-BANG score were recorded. Occurrences of difficult mask ventilation (DMV), laryngoscopy, and intubation were assessed using mask ventilation grade, intubation difficulty score intubation difficult score (IDS), and modified Cormack-Lehane grading during induction of anesthesia. Hypoxic events, hemodynamic disturbances, laryngospasm, and bronchospasm were also recorded. Results: Overall, 250 patients completed the study (Group H: n = 102, with STOP-BANG questionnaire ≥3 and Group L: n = 148, with STOP-BANG criteria < 3). A total of 67 (26.8%) cases of DMV and 63 (25.2%) cases of difficult tracheal intubation (DIT) were encountered overall. The proportion of patients with DMV during induction was 59.8% in Group H versus 4.05% in Group L (P < 0.001). A higher incidence of difficult intubation was observed in Group H (56.9% vs. 11.5%, P < 0.001). More patients in Group H had airway complications such as bleeding and injury to the posterior pharyngeal wall or teeth (P < 0.001). Complications such as hypoxia, hypertension, and tachycardia were observed to be higher in Group H (P < 0.001). Conclusion: STOP-BANG questionnaire is an effective bedside preoperative tool that helps in identifying unanticipated difficult airway.
Résumé Contexte: Le questionnaire STOP-BANG est un outil établi pour le dépistage de l'apnée obstructive du sommeil (AOS). Son utilité pour prédire les voies respiratoires n'a pas été évaluée. Nous avons l'intention d'évaluer les difficultés de gestion des voies respiratoires et les complications périopératoires associées chez les patients souffrant d'AOS non diagnostiquée à l'aide du questionnaire STOP-BANG. Matériels et méthodes: Nous avons réalisé une étude observationnelle prospective sur 250 patients avec le score STOP-BANG de classe I-II de l'American Society of Anesthesiologists, âgés de 18 à 65 ans ont été enregistrés. Les occurrences de ventilation au masque difficile (DMV), de laryngoscopie et d'intubation ont été évaluées en utilisant le grade de ventilation au masque, la difficulté d'intubation score (IDS) et le classement de Cormack-Lehane modifié lors de l'induction de l'anesthésie. Événements hypoxiques, troubles hémodynamiques, laryngospasme, et le bronchospasme ont également été enregistrés. Résultats: Au total, 250 patients ont terminé l'étude (Groupe H : n = 102, avec questionnaire STOP-BANG ≥3 et Groupe L : n = 148, avec critère STOP-BANG < 3). Un total de 67 (26,8%) cas de DMV et 63 (25,2%) cas de DIT ont été rencontrés global. La proportion de patients avec DMV lors de l'induction était de 59,8 % dans le groupe H contre 4,05 % dans le groupe L (P < 0,001). Une incidence plus élevée d'intubation difficile a été observée dans le groupe H (56,9 % contre 11,5 %, P < 0,001). Plus de patients du groupe H ont eu des complications des voies respiratoires telles que saignement et lésion de la paroi postérieure du pharynx ou des dents (P < 0,001). Des complications telles que l'hypoxie, l'hypertension et la tachycardie ont été observé comme étant plus élevé dans le groupe H (P < 0,001). Conclusion: Le questionnaire STOP-BANG est un outil préopératoire efficace au chevet du patient qui aide dans l'identification des voies respiratoires difficiles imprévues. Mots-clés: Intubation difficile, ventilation difficile du masque, score de difficulté d'intubation, apnée obstructive du sommeil, questionnaire STOP-BANG.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Endotraqueal , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Femenino , Humanos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , IntubaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Critical airway incidents are a major cause of morbidity and mortality during anesthesia. Delayed management of airway obstruction quickly leads to severe complications due to the reduced apnea tolerance in infants and neonates. The decision of whether to intubate the trachea during anesthesia is therefore of great importance, particularly as an increasing number of procedures are performed outside of the operating room. AIM: In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated airway management for infants below 6 months of age undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion. We compared demographic, procedural, and health outcome-related data for infants undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion under general endotracheal anesthesia (n = 105) to those receiving monitored anesthesia care (n = 44) without endotracheal intubation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was completed for all infants <6 months of age who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion in our institution's endoscopy suite between January 2002 and January 2017. Descriptive statistics summarized numeric variables using medians and corresponding ranges (minimum-maximum), and categorical variables using frequencies and percentages. Differences in study outcomes between patients undergoing general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care were evaluated with univariate quantile or Firth logistic regression for numerical and categorical outcomes, respectively. Results are presented as ß [95% confidence interval] or odds ratio [95% confidence interval] along with corresponding p-values. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in distribution of age, race, and gender. However, patients selected for general anesthesia had lower median body weights (3.9 kg [range: 2.0-6.7] vs. 4.4 kg [range: 2.6-6.9]), higher percentages of cardiac (95.2% vs. 84.1%), and/or neurologic comorbidities (74.3% vs. 56.8%) and were more frequently given American Society of Anesthesiologists level IV classifications (41.9% vs. 29.6%) indicating that these infants may have had more severe disease than patients selected for monitored anesthesia care. Three monitored-anesthesia-care patients required intraoperative conversion to general anesthesia. General anesthesia patients experienced greater odds of intraoperative hypoxemia (45.2% vs. 29.0%; odds ratio: 2.0 [0.9-4.3], p-value: .09) and required postoperative airway intervention more frequently than monitored-anesthesia-care patients (13.03% vs. 2.3%; odds ratio: 4.6 [0.8-25.6], p-value: .08). Procedure times were identical in both groups (6 min), but general anesthesia resulted in longer median anesthesia times (44 min [range: 22-292] vs. 12 min [range:19-136]; ß:13 [95% 6.9-19.1], p-value: < .001). CONCLUSION: Study results suggest that providers selected general anesthesia over monitored anesthesia care for infants and neonates with low body weights, cardiac comorbidities, and neurologic comorbidities. Increased rates of airway intervention, and increased length of stay may be at least partially related to more severe patient comorbidity, as indicated by higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classifications. However, due to the exploratory nature of these analyses, further confirmatory studies are needed to evaluate the impact of airway selection during PEG on postoperative patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Endotraqueal , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tráquea , Gastrostomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/métodos , Peso CorporalRESUMEN
Over the past several decades, anesthesia has experienced a significant growth in nonoperating room anesthesia. Gastrointestinal suites represent the largest volume location for off-site anesthesia procedures, which include complex endoscopy procedures like endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). These challenging patients and procedures necessitate a shared airway and are typically performed in the prone or semiprone position on a dedicated procedural table. In this Pro-Con commentary article, the Pro side supports the use of monitored anesthesia care (MAC), citing fewer hemodynamic perturbations, decreased side effects from inhalational agents, faster cognitive recovery, and quicker procedural times leading to improved center efficiency (ie, quicker time to discharge). Meanwhile, the Con side favors general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) to reduce the infrequent, but well-recognized, critical events due to impaired oxygenation and/or ventilation known to occur during MAC in this setting. They also argue that procedural interruptions are more frequent during MAC as anesthesia professionals need to rescue patients from apnea with various airway maneuvers. Thus, the risk of hypoxemic episodes is minimized using GEA for ERCP. Unfortunately, neither position is supported by large randomized controlled trials. The consensus opinion of the authors is that anesthesia for ERCP should be provided by a qualified anesthesia professional who weighs the risks and benefits of each technique for a given patient and clinical circumstance. This Pro-Con article highlights the many challenges anesthesia professionals face during ERCPs and encourages thoughtful, individualized anesthetic plans over knee-jerk decisions. Both sides agree that an anesthetic technique administered by a qualified anesthesia professional is favored over an endoscopist-directed sedation approach.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Endotraqueal , Anestesia General , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Anestesia Endotraqueal/efectos adversos , Anestesia Endotraqueal/métodos , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the duration of time from initiation of general endotracheal anesthesia (GETA) to delivery for cesarean deliveries (CDs) performed is related to perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study of patients with singleton nonanomalous gestations undergoing CD ≥37 weeks of gestation under GETA with reassuring fetal status at a single tertiary care center from 2000 to 2016. Duration from GETA initiation until delivery was calculated as the time interval from GETA induction to delivery (I-D), categorized into tertiles. Outcomes for those in the tertile with the shortest I-D were compared with those in the other two tertiles. The primary perinatal outcome was a composite of complications (continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannula for ≥2 consecutive hours, inspired oxygen ≥30% for ≥4 consecutive hours, mechanical ventilation, stillbirth, or neonatal death ≤72 hours after birth). Secondary outcomes were 5-minute Apgar score <7 and a composite of maternal morbidity (bladder injury, bowel injury, and extension of hysterotomy). Bivariable and multivariable analyses were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred eighteen maternal-perinatal dyads were analyzed. They were dichotomized based on I-D ≤4 minutes (those in the tertile with the shortest duration) or >4 minutes. Women with I-D >4 minutes were more likely to have prior abdominal surgery and less likely to have labored prior to CD. I-D >4 minutes was associated with significantly increased frequency of the primary perinatal outcome. This persisted after multivariable adjustment. In bivariable analysis, 5-minute Apgar <7 was more common in the group with I-D >4 minutes, but this did not persist in multivariable analysis. Frequency of maternal morbidity did not differ. CONCLUSION: When CD is performed at term using GETA without evidence of nonreassuring fetal status prior to delivery, I-D interval >4 minutes is associated with increased frequency of perinatal complications. KEY POINTS: · Cesarean delivery under general anesthesia is associated with increased perinatal complications.. · Perinatal complications are increased with increasing duration of exposure to general anesthetics.. · Maternal complications were not increased with shorter duration of exposure to general anesthesia..
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Endotraqueal/efectos adversos , Anestesia Obstétrica/efectos adversos , Cesárea , Feto/efectos de los fármacos , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/inducido químicamente , Trastornos Respiratorios/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Sufrimiento Fetal/inducido químicamente , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Muerte Perinatal/etiología , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortinato , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Gastrobronchial fistula (GBF) is a rare but life-threatening complication of esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction, and airway management during fistula repair is challenging. Here, we describe airway management in a patient undergoing left-sided GBF repair using video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 63-year-old man diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma underwent esophagectomy with reconstruction by gastric pull-up and tabularization of the gastric conduit. Subsequently, about 8âweeks later, the patient presented with repeated pneumonia and a 1-week history of cough with significant sputum, dysphagia, and repeated fever. DIAGNOSIS: GBF, a rare postoperative complication, was located on the left main bronchus at 2âcm below the carina and was diagnosed based on findings from gastroscopy, flexible bronchoscopy, and thoracic computed tomography scan with contrast. INTERVENTIONS: We performed left-sided one-lung ventilation (OLV) under total intravenous anesthesia instead of inhalational anesthetics. The left-sided OLV, with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and nasogastric tube decompression, generated positive pressure across the fistula. It prevented backflow into the left main bronchus. Total intravenous anesthesia preserved hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction and prevented adverse effects associated with inhalational anesthetics. A right-sided, double-lumen endotracheal tube was inserted after anesthesia induction, and surgical repair was performed through a right-sided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. OUTCOMES: Intraoperative hemodynamics remained relatively stable, except for brief tachycardia at 113âbeats/min. Arterial blood gas analysis revealed pH 7.17 and PaO2 89.1âmmHg upon 100% oxygenation, along with hypercapnia (PaCO2 77.1âmmHg), indicating respiratory acidosis. During OLV, pulse oximetry remained higher than 92%. The defect in the left main bronchus was successfully sutured after dissecting the fistula between the left main bronchus and the gastric conduit, and subsequently, OLV resulted in ideal ventilation. LESSONS: A left-sided GBF could lead to leakage from the OLV during surgery. Possible aspiration or alveolar hypoventilation due to this leakage is a major concern during airway management before surgical repair of the main bronchus.
Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Vía Aérea , Fístula Bronquial/cirugía , Carcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Fístula Gástrica/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Anestesia Endotraqueal , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 spreads through respiratory fluids. We aim to quantify aerosolized particles during laryngology procedures to understand their potential for transmission of infectious aerosol-based diseases. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective quantification of aerosol generation. METHODS: Airborne particles (0.3-25 µm in diameter) were measured during live-patient laryngology surgeries using an optical particle counter positioned 60 cm from the oral cavity to the surgeon's left. Measurements taken during the procedures were compared to baseline concentrations recorded immediately before each procedure. Procedures included direct laryngoscopy with general endotracheal anesthesia (GETA), direct laryngoscopy with jet ventilation, and carbon dioxide (CO2 ) laser use with or without jet ventilation, all utilizing intermittent suction. RESULTS: Greater than 99% of measured particles were 0.3 to 1.0 µm in diameter. Compared to baseline, direct laryngoscopy was associated with a significant 6.71% increase in cumulative particles, primarily 0.3 to 1.0 µm particles (P < .0001). 1.0 to 25 µm particles significantly decreased (P < .001). Jet ventilation was not associated with a significant change in cumulative particles; when analyzing differential particle sizes, only 10 to 25 µm particles exhibited a significant increase compared to baseline (+42.40%, P = .002). Significant increases in cumulative particles were recorded during CO2 laser use (+14.70%, P < .0001), specifically in 0.3 to 2.5 µm particles. Overall, there was no difference when comparing CO2 laser use during jet ventilation versus GETA. CONCLUSIONS: CO2 laser use during laryngology surgery is associated with significant increases in airborne particles. Although direct laryngoscopy with GETA is associated with slight increases in particles, jet ventilation overall does not increase particle aerosolization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:2759-2765, 2021.
Asunto(s)
Microbiología del Aire , COVID-19/transmisión , Laringoscopía/efectos adversos , Quirófanos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Aerosoles/análisis , Anestesia Endotraqueal/efectos adversos , Ventilación con Chorro de Alta Frecuencia/efectos adversos , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional , Laringoscopía/métodos , Láseres de Gas/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Succión/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Se realizó una investigación experimental tipo ensayo clínico controlado simple ciego con el fin de evaluar la relajación muscular y los predictores de vía aérea difícil en pacientes programados para cirugía general en el Hospital Central Universitario Dr. Antonio María Pineda. La muestra estuvo conformada por 100 pacientes distribuidos aleatoriamente en cuatro grupos de 25 pacientes cada uno. En los grupos Experimental-1 (E-1) y Control-1 (C-1) se utilizó una dosis del bloqueante neuromuscular Bromuro de Rocuronio de 0,6 mg/kg y en los grupos Experimental-2 (E-2) y Control-2 (C-2) de 1 mg/kg. La edad promedio de los pacientes fue de 34,8 ± 9,8 años; en los grupos E-1 y E-2, los predictores de vía aérea difícil predominantes fueron distancia esternomentoniana (32% y 42%), distancia tiromentoniana (24% y 40%), distancia interincisivos clase I (88% y 92 %), circunferencia de cuello ï¾ 40 cm (16% y 8 %), Mallampati (88% y 40%), extensión atlanto-occipital (28% y 20%) y protrusión mandibular (28% y 20%). En el 72% y 80% de los pacientes de los grupos experimentales y control no hubo intento adicional de intubación orotraqueal (IOT); el tiempo invertido para alcanzar la IOT fue < 1 minuto en el grupo C-2 (64%) y E-2 (72%). Existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre el número de intentos para alcanzar la IOT, la presencia de predictores de vía aérea difícil y la dosis de bloqueante neuromuscular utilizada lo que evidencia de que a medida que se aumenta la dosis del medicamento hay mayor posibilidad de éxitos en la IOT, aun cuando estén presentes predictores de vía aérea difícil(AU)
An experimental simple blind controlled clinical trial was carried out to evaluate muscle relaxation and predictors of difficult airway in patients scheduled for general surgery at the Hospital Central Universitario Dr. Antonio María Pineda. The sample consisted of 100 patients randomly distributed into four groups of 25 patients each. Patients from the Experimental-1 (E-1) and Control-1 (C-1) groups received 0.6 mg/kg of the neuromuscular blocking agent Rocuronium Bromide while Experimetal-2 (E-2) and Control-2 (C-2) patients received a dosage of 1 mg/kg. Average age of participants was 34.8 ± 9.8 years. Predictors of difficult airway in E-1 and E-2 were sternomental distance (32% and 42%, thyromental distance (24% and 40%), interincisive distance class 1 (88% and 92%), neck circumference ï¾ 40 cm (16% and 8%), Mallampati (88% and 40%), atlanto-occipital extension (28% and 20%) and mandibular protrusion (28% and 20%). In 72% and 80% of patients from the E and C groups there was not an additional attempt of orotracheal intubation (OTI); the time invested to reach the OTI was less than one minute in 64% of patients from the C-2 and 72% of the E-2. There are statistically significant differences between the number of attempts to reach the OTI, presence of predictors of difficult airway and the dose of Rocuronium Bromide which means that as the drug dosage increases, there is a greater possibility of success in the OTI, even when predictors of difficult airway are present(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Manejo de la Vía Aérea , Intubación Intratraqueal/mortalidad , Hipoxia , Relajación Muscular/efectos de los fármacos , Cirugía General , Sistema Nervioso Central , Anestesia EndotraquealRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus pandemic, preventing contamination of the anesthesia machine, critical to avoid cross-contamination between patients, has proven challenging when treating premature infants and neonates. While attaching a HEPA filter to the endotracheal tube will protect the anesthesia machine and the gas sampling line from contamination, this contribution to the dead space makes ventilation of these small patients challenging. Direct filtration of the gas sampling line eliminates this problem; however, appropriate filters are not readily available. AIMS: Identify a small filter capable of filtering out particles of a size similar to the SARS-CoV-2 virus for the gas sampling line. METHODS: We used fluorescence microspheres suspended in a solution for a challenge test to determine the filtration efficiency of various filters. The microspheres varied in diameter (0.02 µm, 0.042 µm, 0.109 µm, and 0.989 µm). A fluorescence plate reader was used to evaluate the degree of fluorescence intensity in the flow-through from various filters and referenced to the fluorescence intensity of the input. RESULTS: AHEPA filter, as recommended as an anti-viral filter, effectively filtered all the particles tested. The B. Braun PERIFIX Flat Epidural Filter was the second most effective filter, filtering particles larger than 0.042 µm. Other filters tested did not filter fluorescence microspheres equivalent in size to a single coronavirus particle (0.07 µm). CONCLUSIONS: Although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved the Flat Epidural Filter for use as an anesthesia machine gas filter, our simple challenge test suggests that it could be used to effectively filter the anesthesia gas sampling line.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Endotraqueal/instrumentación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Filtración/instrumentación , Microesferas , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Fluorescencia , Humanos , Lactante , Recién NacidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study was aimed at investigating the effectiveness of the implementation of a comprehensive quality improvement programme (QIP) for reducing the repair rate of the fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB). METHODS: A three-stage improvement strategy was implemented between January 2013 and December 2016. Stage one is the acquisition of information on violations of practice guidelines, repair rate, cost of repair, and incidence of unavailability of FOB during anaesthesia induction of the previous year through auditing. Stage two is the implementation of a quality improvement campaign (QIC) based on the results of stage one. Stage three is the programme perpetuation through monitoring compliance with policy on FOB use by regular internal audits. The effectiveness was retrospectively analyzed on a yearly basis. RESULTS: The annual repair rate, repair cost, and incidence of FOB unavailability before the QIP implementation were 1%, 18,757 USD, and 1.4%, respectively. After QIC, the repair rate in 2013 dropped by 81% (from 1% in 2012 to 0.19% in 2013, p < 0.05). The annual repair cost fell by 32% from 18,758 USD (2012) to 12,820 USD (2013). Besides, the incidence of FOB unavailability plummeted by 71% from 1.4% to 0.4% during the same period. The annual repair rates and incidence of FOB unavailability remained lower in subsequent three years than those before QIP implementation. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a quality improvement programme was effective for reducing the rate and cost of FOB repair as well as unavailability rate, highlighting its beneficial impact on cost-effectiveness and patient safety in a tertiary referral center setting.
Asunto(s)
Broncoscopios , Falla de Equipo/economía , Mantenimiento , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Anestesia Endotraqueal/instrumentación , Broncoscopios/efectos adversos , Broncoscopios/economía , Broncoscopios/normas , Broncoscopios/estadística & datos numéricos , Broncoscopía/instrumentación , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Tecnología de Fibra Óptica , Humanos , Mantenimiento/economía , Mantenimiento/métodos , Mantenimiento/normas , Mantenimiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
At the beginning of the twentieth century, anesthesia was an emerging field without permanent departments, exclusive practitioners, or academic residency programs. Instead, surgeons and nurses administered anesthetic gases in an ad-hoc fashion, exposing patients to the perilous risks of general anesthesia. Dr. Arthur Guedel was a general practitioner from rural Indiana who unexpectedly became an integral part of anesthesia's evolution into a safety conscience and formally recognized expertise. Beginning during his military service in World War I, he refined the stages of ether anesthesia and produced the definitive textbook on inhalational anesthetics. During the prolific career that followed, Guedel also introduced ground-breaking devices for patient-controlled analgesia, cuffed endotracheal intubation, and oral airway patency. His inclusive mentorship, collaborative research, and innovative instruments exemplify his role as a multitalented tinkerer, teacher, and transformative leader. This essay examines Guedel's pioneering contributions and the scope of his influence, all of which revolutionized anesthesia and expanded surgeons' operative capability. Through the lens of Guedel's personal and professional life, this essay further illustrates how the diverse, interdisciplinary, and cutting edge characteristics of the practice itself contributed to anesthesia's increased importance in modern medicine.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Endotraqueal/historia , Anestesiología/historia , Medicina Militar/historia , Analgesia Obstétrica/historia , Anestesia Endotraqueal/instrumentación , Anestesiología/educación , Anestesiología/instrumentación , Animales , Perros , Femenino , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Modelos Animales , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Segunda Guerra MundialRESUMEN
Introducción: La intubación de la vía respiratoria difícil constituye un problema de salud. Para prevenirla, se han utilizado diferentes índices. Objetivo: Evaluar la utilidad del índice de El-Ganzouri en la predicción del grado de dificultad en la intubación traqueal mediante laringoscopia convencional. Método: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo de corte transversal, en pacientes que requirieron intubación traqueal, en el Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras, entre febrero de 2014 y 2017. Esta prueba combina y estratifica siete variables derivadas de parámetros observacionales asociadas individualmente. Se estratificó sus valores y se interpretó < 4 vía respiratoria de fácil acceso y ; 4 vía respiratoria de difícil acceso. Resultados: Se estudiaron 94 pacientes en los que se evaluó el índice de El-Ganzouri. Predominó el grupo etáreo de 50 a 59 años (29,8 por ciento) y el sexo masculino 52,1 por ciento. ASA II fue más frecuente en 66 por ciento. El índice de El Ganzouri primó la apertura oral lt; 4 cm, la distancia tiromentoniana gt; 6.5 cm, El Mallamapati I en 91,5 por ciento, los movimientos del cuello gt; 90°, el peso corporal < 90 kg y ningún antecedente de historia de dificultad en la intubación 67,0 por ciento. Al corroborar las pruebas predictivas con la de Cormack y Lehane, se observó que 92,6 por ciento de los pacientes presentaron una vía respiratoria fácil y esta condición se obtuvo en el 78,7 por ciento con el Índice El Ganzouri. La sensibilidad fue de 71,43 por ciento y la especificidad fue de 20,69 por ciento. El valor predictivo positivo de 6,76 y 90,0 de predictivo negativo. Conclusiones: Se confirmó la utilidad del índice de riesgo multivariado de El-Ganzouri en la predicción del grado de dificultad en la intubación traqueal mediante laringoscopia convencional. Se identificó la sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivos positivos y negativos los cuales mostraron buena predicción de vía respiratoria anatómicamente difícil(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Intubación e Inducción de Secuencia Rápida/métodos , Anestesia Endotraqueal/métodos , Laringoscopía/métodos , Epidemiología Descriptiva , Estudios TransversalesRESUMEN
The article describes a rare clinical case of the development of angioedema of the larynx and pharynx in a patient during a surgery under endotracheal anesthesia. The authors of the article indicate that in the practice of clinic is 1 case for 32011 people, which is 0.003% of all hospitalized in the hospital for the elective surgical treatment of diseases of the upper respiratory tract. After removal of the tonsils and cyst of the nasopharynx, the surgeon noted a pronounced edema of the uvula, the mucous membrane of the soft palate, the lateral walls of the laryngopharynx and larynx. The patient was not taken out of the anesthesia. The mechanical ventilation was continued and the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit and intensive care unit where antiedematous and symptomatic therapy was conducted. On the 3rd day of treatment, the upper respiratory tract edema reduced, the patient was extubated. The authors present an algorithm for the examination and treatment of patients with angioedema.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Endotraqueal , Angioedema , Laringe , Angioedema/etiología , Humanos , Nasofaringe , Faringe , TráqueaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Conscious sedation is not routinely administered for therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in many countries. The aim of our retrospective study was to compare the safety and rate of success and complications during common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction using ERCPs performed with no-sedation (NS) or under general endotracheal anesthesia (GET). METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent ERCP for biliary stone extraction between January 2010 and September 2013 were reviewed, and patients classified to the NS and GET groups. The primary outcomes were the rate of success of complete stone removal and rate of complications, including post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), perforation, bleeding, pneumonia, and mortality within 30 days post-ERCP. Operative time was recorded for analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 630 patients underwent ERCP, 402 with NS and 105 with GET. Among the 402 patients in the NS group, 37 (9.2%) could not complete the procedure due to an inability to tolerate the procedure. The success rate of complete stone extraction was higher among patients in the GET group than the NS group (94.3% versus 75.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). The rate of contrast injection into the pancreatic duct was higher for the NS than GET group (24.9% versus 15.2%, respectively; p = 0.008). Although non-significant, there was a higher incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in the NS than in the GET group (10.4% versus 5.7%, respectively; p = 0.105), while the incidence of pneumonia was higher for the GET group. Biliary pancreatitis, contrast injection into the pancreatic duct and an operation time ≥30 min were independent risks factors for PEP. CONCLUSIONS: ERCP under GET is effective for CBD stone removal, but with slightly higher pneumonia rate after the procedure than non-sedated ERCP.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Endotraqueal , Conducto Colédoco/cirugía , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia Endotraqueal/efectos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The decision to undertake monitored anesthesia care (MAC) or general endotracheal anesthesia (GEA) for patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is influenced by many factors. These include locoregional practice preferences, procedure complexity, patient position, and comorbidities. We aim to review the data regarding anesthesia-administered sedation for ERCP and identify the impact of airway management on procedure success, adverse event rates and endoscopy unit efficiency. RECENT FINDINGS: Several studies have consistently identified patients at high risk for sedation-related adverse events during ERCP. This group includes those with higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class and (BMI). ERCP is commonly performed in the prone position, which can make the placement of an emergent advanced airway challenging. Although this may be alleviated by performing ERCP in the supine position, this technique is more technically cumbersome for the endoscopist. Data regarding the impact of routine GEA on endoscopy unit efficiency remain controversial. SUMMARY: Pursuing MAC or GEA for patients undergoing ERCP is best-approached on an individual basis. Patients at high risk for sedation-related adverse events likely benefit from GEA. Larger, multicenter randomized controlled trials will aid significantly in better delineating which sedation approach is best for an individual patient.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Endotraqueal/métodos , Anestesia General/métodos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Anestesia Endotraqueal/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/psicología , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Satisfacción del Paciente , Selección de Paciente , Propofol/administración & dosificación , Propofol/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intrathoracic goitres (ITG) often present with compressive symptoms and require specialised care by experienced surgical teams. Most ITG can be accessed by a transcervical approach (TCA) and only between 1 and 15% will require an extracervical approach (ECA). Many controversies exist regarding the clinical presentation, evaluation, selection of cases for ECA, surgical technique and outcomes. This paper reviews the recent literature on the management, outcomes and evidence-based treatment strategies of ITG. METHODS: We conducted a review of the literature on the evaluation, management and outcomes of surgery for ITGs. RESULTS: The incidence of cancer in the ITGs ranges between 4 and 20%. Multiplanar CT scanning offers the best preoperative evaluation and aids to determine the approach. Most ITG can be accessed by TCA and ECA are only needed in maximum 15% of cases. In experienced hands, the outcome of these surgeries is comparable to thyroid surgery for non-ITG. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for ITG is challenging. The experienced surgeon however, with few exceptions can address ITG via TCA, with outcomes comparable to those of uncomplicated thyroid surgery.