Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.569
Filtrar
1.
Cardiovasc Diabetol ; 23(1): 333, 2024 Sep 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39252002

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim was to investigate the total prevalence of known and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus (DM), and the association of DM with perioperative complications following elective, infrarenal, open surgical (OSR) or endovascular (EVAR), Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: In this Norwegian prospective multicentre study, 877 patients underwent preoperative screening for DM by HbA1c measurements from November 2017 to December 2020. Diabetes was defined as screening detected HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) or previously diagnosed diabetes. The association of DM with in-hospital complications, length of stay, and 30-day mortality rate were evaluated using adjusted and unadjusted logistic regression models. RESULTS: The total prevalence of DM was 15% (95% CI 13%,17%), of which 25% of the DM cases (95% CI 18%,33%) were undiagnosed upon admission for AAA surgery. The OSR to EVAR ratio was 52% versus 48%, with similar distribution among DM patients, and no differences in the prevalence of known and undiagnosed DM in the EVAR versus the OSR group. Total 30-day mortality rate was 0.6% (5/877). Sixty-six organ-related complications occurred in 58 (7%) of the patients. DM was not statistically significantly associated with a higher risk of in-hospital organ-related complications (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.57,2.39, p = 0.57), procedure-related complications (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.79,2.63, p = 0.20), 30-day mortality (p = 0.09) or length of stay (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.88,1.28, p = 0.54). According to post-hoc-analyses, organ-related complications were more frequent in patients with newly diagnosed DM (n = 32) than in non-DM patients (OR 4.92; 95% CI 1.53,14.3, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Twenty-five percent of all DM cases were undiagnosed at the time of AAA surgery. Based on post-hoc analyses, undiagnosed DM seems to be associated with an increased risk of organ related complications following AAA surgery. This study suggests universal DM screening in AAA patients to reduce the number of DM patients being undiagnosed and to improve proactive diabetes care in this population. The results from post-hoc analyses should be confirmed in future studies.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Biomarcadores , Diabetes Mellitus , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidad , Noruega/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades no Diagnosticadas/epidemiología , Enfermedades no Diagnosticadas/diagnóstico , Mortalidad Hospitalaria
2.
Ren Fail ; 46(2): 2397051, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39248372

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) increases with age. Elective intervention for AAA is critical to prevent rupture associated with very high mortality among older males. METHODS: The aim of this study was to address the impact of post-contrast acute kidney-PC-AKI injury among patients treated with endovascular repair of ruptured AAA-EVAR on outcomes such as new onset chronic kidney disease-CKD and mortality among patients within a two-year trial. RESULTS: The same study group (of n = 192 patients) underwent reassessment, two years after EVAR treatment. The overall mortality rate was 16.67%, and it was higher in the AKI group - 38.89%. CKD patients had a mortality rate of 23.88% (n = 16). Among patients with an aneurysm diameter >67 mm mortality rate reached 20% (n = 6), while in the previously reported diabetes mellitus group 37.93% (n = 11). New onset of CKD was diagnosed in 23% of cases. Preexisting CKD patients with PC- AKI contributed to a 33.33% mortality rate (n = 8). CONCLUSION: This study concludes that PC-AKI impacts outcomes and survival in endovascularly treated AAAs. Type 2 diabetes and preexisting chronic kidney disease are associated with higher mortality within a 2-year follow-up, however gender factor was not significant. A larger aneurysm diameter is related with a higher prevalence of PC-AKI. These factors should be taken into account during screening, qualifying patients for the treatment and treating patients with AAA. It may help to identify high-risk individuals and tailor preventive measurements and treatment options accordingly, improving treatment results and reducing mortality.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Masculino , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medios de Contraste
3.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 66(3)2024 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39186003

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyze how the experience of the surgical team went to impact the outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: This is a single-center, observational cohort study with retrospective analysis of all OR for intact AAA performed between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2022. The primary outcome was survival at 30 days and in follow-up, and a composite outcome of mortality and major complication. The secondary outcome was freedom from aorta-related reintervention. All outcomes were stratified according to the experience of the operating team (surgeons and anesthesiology). RESULTS: We analyzed 103 (7.2%) patients: 97 (94.2%) males and 6 (5.8%) females. The mean age was 76 ± 8 years (range, 55-93). The best possible team composition was present in 52 (50.5%) interventions. The follow-up index was 0.82 ± 0.18 (range, 0.6-1.0). Mean follow-up duration was 59 ± 43 months (range, 0-158). We observed no differences between teams in major complications (best, 17.3% vs mixed, 21.6%; OR: 0.4, P = 0.622), 30 days mortality (best, 0% vs mixed, 5.9%; OR: 7.6, P = 0.118) and composite outcome (best, 11.5% vs mixed, 17.6%; OR: 0.8, P = 0.416). Cox regression analysis identified the best possible team as a protective factor against the need for reintervention (hazard ratio: 0.2; 95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.88, P = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, OR of AAA yielded satisfactory results in terms of safety and efficacy independently of the team's experience. A more experienced team may protect against aorta-related reintervention.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(27): e38822, 2024 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968460

RESUMEN

This study aimed to identify highly valuable blood indicators for predicting the clinical outcomes of patients with aortic aneurysms (AA). Baseline data of 1180 patients and 16 blood indicators were obtained from the public Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database. The association of blood indicators with 4 types of clinical outcomes was analyzed, and the prediction performance of core indicators on different outcomes was next evaluated. Then, we explored the detailed association between core indicators and key outcomes among subgroups. Finally, a machine learning model was established to improve the prediction performance. Generalized linear regression analysis indicated that only red cell volume distribution width (RDW) was commonly associated with 4 end-points including surgery requirement, ICU stay requirement, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital death (all P < .05). Further, RDW showed the best performance for predicting in-hospital death by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The significant association between RDW and in-hospital death was then determined by 3 logistic regression models adjusting for different variables (all P < .05). Stratification analysis showed that their association was mainly observed in unruptured AA and abdominal AA (AAA, all P < .05). We subsequently established an RDW-based model for predicting the in-hospital death only in patients with unruptured AAA. The favorable prediction performance of the RDW-based model was verified in training, validation, and test sets. RDW was found to make the greatest contribution to in-hospital death within the model. RDW had favorable clinical value for predicting the in-hospital death of patients, especially in unruptured AAA.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Índices de Eritrocitos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/sangre , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Curva ROC , Aprendizaje Automático
5.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 108: 437-451, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38960091

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The unibody bifurcated aortic endograft (AFX/AFX2) has emerged as a treatment option for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of the unibody endograft. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed. Studies assessing the unibody endograft for AAA repair between 2014 and 2023 were included. The defined primary outcomes were the incidences of type I, II, and III endoleaks. The secondary outcomes were access site problems, aneurysm-related mortality, aneurysm rupture, all-cause mortality, aneurysm sac growth, limb occlusion, stent graft migration, and technical success rate. RESULTS: Fourteen studies including 12 observational studies and 2 randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis included 10 studies with 12,690 patients that reported the measured outcomes, and excluded 4 studies that did not. Type II endoleaks had the highest incidence of 12% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4-20%), followed by type III endoleaks with an incidence of 3% (95% CI: 1-5%). The incidence of type I endoleaks was 1% (95% CI: 0-2%). A subgroup analysis by follow-up duration showed that type II endoleak incidence was higher after 1 to 2 years of follow-up than 3 to 4 years of follow-up. The incidence of aneurysmal mortality was 2% (95% CI: 0-7%), limb occlusion was 1% (95% CI: 0-1%), stent graft migration was 1% (95% CI: 0-2%), aneurysmal rupture was 6% (95% CI: 2-11%), access site problems were 7% (95% CI: 2-13%), aneurysm sac growth was 2% (95% CI: 0-4%), all-cause mortality was 21% (95% CI: 4-38%), and technical success rate was 100% (95% CI: 98-100%). CONCLUSIONS: The unibody endograft is a safe and minimally invasive approach for AAA repair. However, potential complications necessitate close patient follow-up after the intervention.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Endofuga , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Diseño de Prótesis , Stents , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Endofuga/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Factores de Tiempo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
7.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 104(2): 300-317, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38924318

RESUMEN

Minimally invasive surgery is a useful alternative to open repair for patients with nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). We aim to compare the clinical outcomes for three different minimally invasive techniques: hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS), total laparoscopic surgery (TLS), and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched between January and March 2023. Cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing two minimally invasive techniques were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes were mortality (in-hospital, 30-day, or 1-year) and reintervention rates (30-day or 1-year). Length of surgery, blood loss, transfusion volume, conversion to open surgery, major complication rates, length of hospital stay, and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay were also evaluated. Eight cohort studies and one RCT were included comparing patients undergoing HALS (n = 500), TLS (n = 263), and EVAR (n = 438) for elective AAA repair. The TLS group had the highest rate of 30-day postoperative reinterventions (p = 0.00056), the longest surgical duration (p = 0.0311), and the highest rate of conversion to open surgery (p < 0.001). TLS was also associated with the most blood loss during surgery, the highest blood transfusion volumes, and the longest length of ICU stay, although these results did not reach statistical significance. Subgroup analysis revealed superior contemporary EVAR outcomes compared to TLS. Laparoscopic surgery (LAS) and EVAR have comparable mortality rates. However, LAS, particularly TLS, is significantly less efficacious than EVAR in terms of intraoperative conversions to open surgery and 30-day reintervention rates. Further controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the evidence.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Reparación Endovascular de Aneurismas , Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Reparación Endovascular de Aneurismas/efectos adversos , Reparación Endovascular de Aneurismas/instrumentación , Reparación Endovascular de Aneurismas/mortalidad , Laparoscópía Mano-Asistida/efectos adversos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Tiempo de Internación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 108: 307-316, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38942363

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Assess subsequent cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) according to the existence of isolated endoleak type 2 (EL2) at 1 year after EVAR implantation. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included patients treated with EVAR between 2010 and 2017 in the vascular surgery department of the University Hospital of Lyon with an infrarenal AAA > 50 mm. The baseline clinical characteristics collected just before EVAR were retrieved from electronic patient records of our institution. AAA characteristics, procedure, and the 1-year postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) were reported. Study end points, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse lower-extremity events (MALE), and all-cause mortality were recorded during follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of isolated EL2 (EL2 +) or absence (EL2 -) of any endoleak on CTA at 1 year. MACE, MALE, and all-cause mortality were compared between both groups. RESULTS: During the study period, 589 patients were treated by endovascular surgery and 207 were included. According to the CTA results at 1 year, 60 patients (29%) were included in the EL2 + group and 147 patients (71%) in the EL2 - group. A total of 109 patients (53%) experienced a MACE or MALE; significantly fewer patients in the EL2 + than in the EL2 - group did so (P = 0.009). There were 47 patients (23%) who experienced at least 1 MALE, and the frequency was significantly lower in the EL2 + group (P = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AAA treated by EVAR who did not develop EL2 at 1 year were at higher risk of MALE during follow-up. This might be explained by more frequent symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease at baseline in this group. These patients therefore require a closer follow-up and strict control of cardiovascular risk factors to prevent cardiovascular morbi-mortality.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Endofuga , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Masculino , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Endofuga/etiología , Endofuga/mortalidad , Endofuga/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medición de Riesgo , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte
9.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 108: 112-126, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38942366

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Long-term data surrounding the impact of different endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) surveillance strategies are limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to characterize postoperative imaging patterns, as well as to evaluate the association of duplex ultrasound surveillance after the first postoperative year with 5-year EVAR outcomes. METHODS: EVAR patients (2003-2016), who survived at least 1 year without aneurysm rupture, conversion to open repair, and reintervention in the Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network were examined to provide all subjects ≥3 years of follow-up time. Patients were categorized into 6 cohorts after the first postoperative year: No imaging (N = 953); computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only (N = 2,976); duplex ultrasound-only (DUS; N = 1,808); combined CT/MRI + DUS with >50% being CT/MRI (N = 1,937); combined CT/MRI + DUS with >50% being DUS (N = 2,253); and mixed (CT + DUS + MRI N = 1,272). Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)-related reintervention, rupture, conversion to open repair, and all-cause mortality were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models identified variables associated with using DUS-only imaging (versus CT/MRI only). Cox regression models compared 5-year outcomes between patients receiving DUS-only versus CT/MRI-only imaging. RESULTS: A total of 11,199 EVAR patients were examined (mean age 76 ± 7 years; female: 20%; nonelective: 10%). DUS-only imaging surveillance after the first postoperative year was more likely to occur after elective repairs, as well as among older, male patients. Smaller (<6 cm) preoperative AAA diameter and absence of documented concurrent iliac aneurysm was also associated with DUS-only follow-up. Additionally, no endoleak detection on index EVAR completion imaging, as well as a documented >5 mm decrease in AAA sac diameter at 1-year follow-up was more common with DUS-only surveillance protocols. Post-EVAR DUS-only imaging after the first postoperative year had the lowest incidence of reintervention, conversion to open repair, and rupture (as well as the composite reintervention/open conversion/rupture; log-rank P < 0.001 for all). Further, patients receiving exclusively DUS after their first postoperative year had better overall survival (log-rank P < 0.001). These outcome advantages that were associated with DUS-only surveillance compared with CT/MRI-only surveillance after EVAR persisted when controlling for baseline covariates, preoperative AAA diameter, prior aortic surgery history, sac growth, and presence of endoleak (all P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: EVAR patients selected for DUS-only surveillance after the first postoperative year have excellent freedom from AAA-related reintervention, conversion to open repair, rupture and all-cause mortality. These findings remained on multivariable analysis after adjusting for baseline characteristics, endoleak status and sac diameter changes within the first year. This is the first registry-based investigation to document long-term EVAR outcomes for patients entered into a DUS-only monitoring protocol which serves to corroborate the growing evidence base that DUS may be able to supplant CT surveillance in certain subgroups. A prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing DUS versus CT-based imaging after EVAR is needed to validate these findings which may serve to change current practice guidelines, as well as industry and regulatory stakeholder requirements.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Sistema de Registros , Bases de Datos Factuales , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía/métodos
10.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 108: 239-245, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38942365

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Late open conversion (LOC) following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a rare complication with a high morbidity and mortality and is often proposed as the last line of treatment after failure of endovascular reintervention of any type. This study aimed to highlights the limitations of EVAR follow-up imaging in characterizing endoleaks, which may contribute to the failure of endovascular reinterventions and lead to LOC. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study recruited all EVAR implanted in Amiens University Hospital (France) between January 2008 and December 2022. Elective LOC was defined as surgical conversion >1 month after EVAR. The primary endpoint was the rate of wrong categorization of endoleaks by follow-up exams before LOC. Secondary endpoints were the morbidity and the mortality associated with LOC. RESULTS: Seven hundred eight EVARs were performed in our institution, 30 required elective LOC. Twenty-five of them were treated for sac enlargement due to an endoleak (83.3%) (all types). Wrong categorization of the endoleak was noted in 13 patients (52.2%). Twelve of these recategorizations involved the preoperative diagnosis of a type II endoleaks (92.3%). The change in categorization in 7 out of 12 cases (58%) was in favor of a type I endoleak, other recategorization included 1 type III (8%) and 4 type IV (33%). One patient died during the 30-day postoperative period and 7 patients (28%) presented a major complication; the median length of stay was 13 days (interquartile range 9-21). CONCLUSIONS: Routine follow-up examinations such as angioscanner and contrast Doppler ultrasound appear to be limited in their ability to categorize the type of persistent endoleak, which may increase the number of patients requiring LOC. New precision diagnostic imaging techniques, such as dynamic examinations, need to be developed to limit the need for LOC.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta , Endofuga , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Endofuga/etiología , Endofuga/diagnóstico por imagen , Endofuga/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Francia , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/efectos adversos
11.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 108: 148-156, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38942371

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening has been offered to 65-year-old men living in Oslo, Norway, since May 2011. A significant number of AAA-related deaths occurred in individuals who are not eligible for screening. The primary aim of this study was to describe the group of patients admitted to Oslo University Hospital with a ruptured AAA after the implementation of the local AAA screening project. The following parameters were investigated: AAA detection before rupture, surveillance status, eligibility for screening, and comorbidities. We also sought to compare outcomes (repair rates and 30-day mortality) between patients with and without an incidentally detected AAA prior to rupture. METHODS: This cohort study included patients admitted acutely to Oslo University Hospital due to a symptomatic or ruptured AAA in the period January 2011 to December 2022. Data on demographics, prior AAA detection, surveillance status, treatment, and mortality were collected retrospectively through electronic medical records. RESULTS: We identified 200 patients with a symptomatic or ruptured AAA, among which 79 (40%) had an AAA detected before rupture-one (1%) through screening and 78 (39%) incidentally. Up to 30% of the incidentally detected AAAs were not under any surveillance. Six patients were found eligible for screening: one had attended, three were non-attenders, and two had not been invited. Patients with an incidentally detected AAA before rupture had a more advanced age and a significantly higher degree of comorbidities than patients without a previously detected AAA, and the repair rates in these groups were 56% and 84%, respectively (P < 0.001). Adjusted for comorbidities and risk factors, the odds ratio for repair among patients with incidentally detected AAA was 0.56 (P = 0.292). The 30-day mortality was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.097). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with a ruptured AAA were not eligible for screening, but 39% of the patients had an incidentally detected AAA prior to rupture. Standardized reporting and follow-up of incidentally detected AAAs is thus identified as an additional measure to organized screening in the effort to reduce AAA-related mortality.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Hallazgos Incidentales , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/epidemiología , Rotura de la Aorta/etiología , Anciano , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Noruega/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Medición de Riesgo , Hospitales Universitarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tamizaje Masivo , Pronóstico , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Comorbilidad
12.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 108: 36-46, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38942379

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the endovascular aneurysm repair era, open surgical repair (OSR) is performed for ruptured abdominal aorta aneurysm (RAAA) in patients with complex aneurysm neck and technical difficulties. Understanding the risk factors of OSR is essential for the clinical selection of the ideal surgical procedure. We aimed to re-evaluate the outcomes of OSR and treatment options for RAAA. METHODS: Patients who underwent OSR for RAAA between January 2010 and December 2022 were enrolled in this single-center retrospective observational study. Preoperative status, operative findings, and postoperative course were retrospectively reviewed. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between age and early postoperative mortality. RESULTS: Among 142 patients, 43 (30.3%) and 99 (69.7%) were aged ≥80 and <80 years, respectively. Postoperative mortality within 30 days occurred in 24 (16.9%) patients (11/43 [25.6%] and 13/99 [13.1%] patients aged ≥80 and <80 years, respectively; hazard ratio = 1.95; P = 0.069). In a multivariable analysis, increased postoperative mortality within 30 days was associated with age ≥80 years (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR = 2.36; P = 0.049), the presence of preoperative or intraoperative cardiopulmonary arrest (aHR = 12.0; P < 0.001), and postoperative gastrointestinal disorder (aHR = 4.42; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular aneurysm repair may be preferable in older people; however, its use in cases of preoperative or intraoperative cardiopulmonary arrest or perioperative gastrointestinal disorders remains controversial, and a careful discussion on the surgical indications is needed in such cases.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Rotura de la Aorta , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Medición de Riesgo , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Anciano , Urgencias Médicas
13.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 108: 157-165, 2024 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38944191

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To describe the outcomes of aortic endograft thrombosis (AET) as an indication for open conversion (OC) after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in a multicenter experience. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed cases of OC for AET following EVAR across 12 Italian Vascular Surgery centers from 1997 to September 2022. The end points were as follows: 30-day mortality and major postoperative complications. Follow-up data included survival and aortic-related complications. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (mean age: 68.6 ± 8.5 years) were included. The median elapsed time between EVAR and OC was 26.46 months (interquartile range: 13.8-45.9). Proximal aortic cross-clamping site was supraceliac in 8 out of 16 (50%) patients, and complete removal of the stentgraft was achieved in 75% of cases (12/16 patients). Reconstructions were aorto-bi-iliac grafts in 8 cases (50%), 7 aortobifemoral bypass grafts (43.8%), and 1 aortoaortic tube graft (6.3%). All patients were symptomatic at presentation (68.7% unilateral acute limb ischemia, 25% bilateral acute limb ischemia, 1 patient had chronic severe claudication). Thirty-day mortality was 12.5% (2/16 patients). The overall morbidity rate was 43.8% (7 of 16 patients). No specific risk factors for early mortality were found. The overall estimated survival rate was 80.4% at 1 year, 62.5% at 2 years, and 41.7% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: OC for AET is typically reserved for complex cases that are not amenable to endovascular solutions. The frequent need for suprarenal clamping and complete endograft removal seems to be associated with high short-term mortality.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Prótesis Vascular , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Trombosis , Humanos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Anciano , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Italia , Factores de Riesgo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/cirugía , Trombosis/mortalidad , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/efectos adversos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/cirugía , Stents , Remoción de Dispositivos/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Reparación Endovascular de Aneurismas
14.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 58(7): 723-732, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886243

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Endovascular aneurysm repair, though minimally invasive and has the benefit of relatively low perioperative complication rates, it is associated with significant long term reintervention rates related to endoleaks. Several variables have been studied to predict the outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair, 1 of which is the calcium burden of the vasculature. This prompted us to study the association between calcium burden measured by the standardized Agatston scoring system and the outcomes of Endovascular aneurysm repair. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent Endovascular aneurysm repair from 2008 to 2020 at our institution and who had a non-contrast computerized tomography scan preoperatively, accounting for 87 patients. The calcium burden of the vasculature was measured by the Agatston scoring system allowing for better reproducibility, and the outcome variables included mortality and endoleaks. RESULTS: Patients with higher median total calcium scores (≥12966.9) had significantly lesser survival (79.8% vs 52.3% (P = .002) at five years compared to patients with lower median total calcium score (<12966.9). Also, patients with type 2 endoleaks had higher calcium scores in above the aneurysm level ((1591.2 vs 688.2), P = .05)) compared to patients with no type 2 endoleaks. CONCLUSION: Calcium score assigned using a standardized Agatston scoring system can be used as a predictor of mortality risk assisting in deciding the treatment of choice for patients.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Endofuga , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Calcificación Vascular , Humanos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Endofuga/etiología , Endofuga/diagnóstico por imagen , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/mortalidad , Calcificación Vascular/terapia , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Aortografía , Persona de Mediana Edad
15.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 106: 289-296, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830448

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Considering a patient's anatomy and vascular conditions, aorto-femoral bypass is a treatment approach for the open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. This study aimed at evaluating changes in the remnant iliac artery and their correlation with the preservation state of retrograde flow from femoral anastomosis. METHODS: Of 221 patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery between 2007 and 2022 in Pusan National University Hospital, 29 patients who underwent aorto-femoral bypass were included in this retrospective cohort study. Of these patients, 21 underwent aortobifemoral bypass and 8 underwent aortoiliac-and-femoral bypass. The change in size of the iliac artery from preoperative to postoperative and whether this difference in size depended on the status of postoperative retrograde flow were investigated. Additionally, factors affecting overall mortality and ischemic complications were identified. RESULTS: The median duration from operation to the last follow-up was 2069.5 days (about 5.7 years). The average age of the patients was 78.1 years, and the proportion of males was 75.9%. In cases of disappearance of postoperative retrograde flow from the femoral anastomosis, the postoperative iliac artery size was significantly reduced compared to its preoperative size (18.4 ± 18.9 mm vs. 13.2 ± 7.9 mm, respectively; P = 0.04). The group with maintained retrograde flow had significantly larger residual common iliac artery size than the group with disappearance of flow. (20.0 ± 28.0 mm vs. 14.6 ± 8.5 mm, respectively; P = 0.02). Disappearance of retrograde flow was a significant factor in the iliac artery size reduction after surgery (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-5.3; P = 0.02). Three patients with maintained retrograde flow (18.8%) required intervention owing to an increase in the size of the iliac artery. The factors that significantly influenced overall death as analyzed by Cox proportional hazard regression were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (hazard ratio, 36.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-870.0; P = 0.03), peripheral arterial occlusive disease (hazard ratio, 12.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-115.8; P = 0.02), and disappearance of retrograde flow (hazard ratio, 8.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-63.9; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Among the open repair methods for abdominal aortic aneurysms, if retrograde flow was not maintained through femoral anastomosis when aorto-femoral bypass was performed, the size of the remaining iliac artery decreased. However, loss of retrograde flow increased long-term mortality. When aorto-femoral bypass is performed, regular imaging follow-up is necessary at appropriate intervals to check the remnant iliac artery and retrograde flow.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Arteria Femoral , Arteria Ilíaca , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Arteria Ilíaca/fisiopatología , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hospitales Universitarios , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Isquemia/cirugía , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad
16.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 68(4): 469-477, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38871213

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: One year aneurysm sac dynamics after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) were independently associated with a greater all cause mortality risk in prior registry studies but were limited in completeness and granularity. This retrospective analysis aimed to study the impact of sac dynamics on survival within the Endurant Stent Graft Global Registry (ENGAGE) with five year follow up. METHODS: A total of 1 263 subjects were enrolled in the ENGAGE Registry between March 2009 and April 2011. One year aneurysm sac changes were calculated between the one month post-operative imaging scans and the scan closest to the time of one year follow up. Sac regression was defined as a sac decrease of ≥ 5 mm and sac expansion as aneurysm sac growth ≥ 5 mm. The primary outcome was the five year all cause mortality rate. Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from all cause death were calculated. Multivariable Cox regression was used to determine the association between sac dynamics and all cause death. RESULTS: At one year, 441 of the 949 study participants with appropriate imaging (46%) had abdominal aortic aneurysm sac regression, 462 (49%) remained stable, and 46 (4.8%) had sac expansion. For patients with sac regression, the five year all cause mortality rate was 20%, compared with 28% for stable sac (p = .007) and 37% for the sac expansion (p = .010) cohorts. After adjustment, the sac expansion and stable sac cohorts were associated with a greater all cause mortality rate (expansion: hazard ratio [HR] 1.8; 95% CI 1.1 - 3.2; p = .032; stable: HR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1 - 1.9; p = .019). CONCLUSION: In the ENGAGE Global Registry, the one year rate of sac regression was 46%, and one year sac regression was observed to be associated with greater five year survival, corroborating prior findings using data from vascular registries. Sac regression could become the new standard for success after EVAR.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents , Prótesis Vascular , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier
18.
Br J Radiol ; 97(1160): 1461-1466, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38848475

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if ileo-psoas muscle size and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) can predict long-term survival after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: Patients who underwent EVAR between 2004 and 2012 in a single centre were included. Total psoas muscle area (TPA), abdominal VAT area, subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and total adipose tissue were measured on the preoperative CT. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Values are presented as median and interquartile range or absolute number and percentage. Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the associations with mortality. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty-four patients could be included in the study. During a median follow-up of 8 (4-11) years, 223 (79.9%) patients died. Age (P ≤ .001), cardiovascular (P = .041), cerebrovascular (P = .009), renal diseases (P = .002), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P ≤ .001) were independently associated with mortality. TPA was associated with mortality in a univariate (P = .040), but not in a multivariate regression model (P = .764). No significant association was found between mortality and TPA index (P = .103) or any of the adiposity measurements with the exception of SAT (P = .040). However, SAT area loss in a multivariate analysis (P = .875). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of core muscle size and VAT did not contribute to improving the prediction of long-term survival after EVAR. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The finding of this study contradicts the previously claimed utility of core muscle size and VAT in predicting long-term survival after EVAR.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Grasa Intraabdominal , Músculos Psoas , Sarcopenia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Grasa Intraabdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Músculos Psoas/diagnóstico por imagen , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Persona de Mediana Edad
19.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 106: 61-70, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735472

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute isolated abdominal aortic dissection (IAAD) is a rare condition and treatment recommendations are lacking. Most previous studies included both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The aims were to determine the proportion of IAAD among patients with acute type B aortic dissection as well as to describe patient characteristics, radiological findings, and frequency of early and late complications and to explore sex differences. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study including all patients hospitalized with acute symptomatic IAAD in Stockholm County during 2012-2021. RESULTS: A total of 277 patients with acute type B aortic dissection were identified, of whom 10% (n = 28/277) had acute IAAD. Median age was 56 years and 43% (n = 12/28) were women. Hypertension was diagnosed in 46% (n = 13/28) prior to admission. At onset, abdominal pain was the predominant complaint (93%, n = 26/28) and 93% (n = 26/28) were hypertensive on admission. The suprarenal aorta was involved in 39% (n = 11/28) and at least 1 of the iliac arteries in 50% (n = 14/28). All but 1 patient had uncomplicated IAAD (96%, n = 27/28). One patient presented with aortic rupture, treated with open surgical repair. Among patients with primarily uncomplicated IAAD, 7% eventually developed chronic complications (n = 2/27). Median maximum aortic diameter at 1-year follow-up was 21 mm (interquartile range 17-28). Only 1 patient had an aortic diameter exceeding 30 mm. None of the patients died during follow-up; median follow-up was 3.0 years (interquartile range 2-8). CONCLUSIONS: Early and late complications are rare in patients with acute symptomatic IAAD and a conservative approach with antihypertensive treatment and surveillance in uncomplicated cases seems reasonable.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Disección Aórtica Abdominal , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Aguda , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección Aórtica Abdominal/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica Abdominal/cirugía , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Suecia/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 106: 196-204, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38810725

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the standard of care for patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms over the last 2 decades. Endograft technology and treatment of complications like endoleaks, graft migration, or graft occlusion developed over time. However, sometimes open surgical conversion maybe required. Our aim was to analyze the indications, the technical aspects and outcomes in patients who underwent open conversion after EVAR with different types and generations of endografts. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study reviewed all patients who underwent EVAR from 2004 to 2020. Open surgical conversions >1 month post EVAR were identified. Conversions for graft infection were excluded. Indications for conversion and operative technique were analyzed. Primary endpoint of the study was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were re-interventions and follow-up mortality. RESULTS: During 2004 and 2020, 443 consecutive EVARs were performed, and 28 patients required open surgical conversion, with an additional 3 referred from other hospitals (N = 31). The median age was 75 (range 58-93); 94% were male. Conversion was performed after a median time of 55 months (range 16-209). Twenty patients underwent elective and 11 emergency conversion. Indications for open conversion were graft migration, respectively, disease progression with endoleak type Ia and/or Ib in 52% (16/31) and sac expansion due to endoleak type II in 26% (8/31). Of the 31 patients, 17 (55%) had at least one previous endovascular re-intervention. All patients met the device-specific instructions for use for each implanted endograft. In-hospital intervention rate was 16% (5/31). Thirty-day mortality rate was 3% (1/31) with one patient died due to multiorgan failure after rupture with complete endograft replacement. Five patients (16%) died during follow-up. Mid-term follow-up was 47.5 months (range 24-203) with estimated cumulative survival rates of 97%, 89%, and 84%, at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Late open conversion remains a valuable treatment option and can be performed safely in elective and emergency setting with a low early mortality. Lifelong surveillance and prompt intervention when necessary are essential in ensuring optimal outcomes after EVAR and preventing the need for emergent conversions.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Prótesis Vascular , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta , Reparación Endovascular de Aneurismas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/efectos adversos , Endofuga/etiología , Endofuga/cirugía , Endofuga/mortalidad , Reparación Endovascular de Aneurismas/efectos adversos , Reparación Endovascular de Aneurismas/instrumentación , Reparación Endovascular de Aneurismas/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Diseño de Prótesis , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...