RESUMEN
Coronary intervention involving the region of bifurcation remains a challenging issue for the cardiologist as well as a complication. A number of factors including the angulation of side branch with the main branch determines the success. Though provisional strategy remains the best option in bifurcation intervention, at times a two-stent strategy cannot be avoided. We report a case in which percutaneous coronary intervention was performed on the left anterior descending artery (LAD) at its bifurcation with a major diagonal branch (> 2.5 mm). The ostium of the diagonal was diseased, and the branch took off from the LAD at an unfavorable angle (> 120°). We describe the use of the "shepherd's crook wire curve" approach, a modification of the reverse wire technique, which allowed us to successfully wire, dilate, and protect the diagonal and so named to reflect its resemblance to the shape of a shepherd's crook.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Masculino , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Catéteres Cardíacos , AncianoAsunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Paclitaxel , Sirolimus , Animales , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Conejos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/efectos de los fármacosAsunto(s)
Paclitaxel , Sirolimus , Animales , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Conejos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Materiales Biocompatibles RevestidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) provide similar results to drug-coated balloons (DCBs) but are inferior to drug-eluting stents (DES) at 1 year. However, the long-term efficacy of BVS in these patients remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of BVS in patients with ISR. METHODS: RIBS VI (Restenosis Intrastent: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Treatment; NCT02672878) and RIBS VI Scoring (Restenosis Intrastent: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Treatment With Scoring Balloon; NTC03069066) are prospective multicenter studies designed to evaluate the results of BVS in patients with ISR (N = 220). The inclusion and exclusion criteria were identical to those used in the RIBS IV (ISR of DES) (Restenosis Intra-stent of Drug-eluting Stents: Drug-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent; NCT01239940) and RIBS V (ISR of bare-metal stents) (Restenosis Intra-stent of Bare Metal Stents: Paclitaxel-eluting Balloon vs Everolimus-eluting Stent; NCT01239953) randomized trials (including 249 ISR patients treated with DCBs and 249 ISR patients treated with DES). A prespecified comparison of the long-term results obtained with these treatment modalities (ie, DES, DCBs, and BVS) was performed. RESULTS: Clinical follow-up at 3 years was obtained in all (100%) 718 patients. The 3-year target lesion revascularization rate after BVS was 14.1% (vs 12.9% after DCBs [not significant], and 5.2% after DES [HR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.47-5.36; P = 0.001]). In a landmark analysis (>1 year), the target lesion revascularization rate after BVS was higher than after DES (adjusted HR: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.15-10.08) and DCBs (adjusted HR: 3.33; 95% CI: 1.14-9.70). Very late vessel thrombosis was also more frequent with BVS (BVS: 1.8%, DCBs: 0.4%, DES: 0%; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, late clinical results of DES are superior to those obtained with DCBs and BVS. Beyond the first year, DCBs are safer and more effective than BVS.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Absorbibles , Reestenosis Coronaria , Diseño de Prótesis , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo , Masculino , Resultado del Tratamiento , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Reestenosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Reestenosis Coronaria/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Factores de Riesgo , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Stents , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoAsunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Sistema de Registros , Sirolimus , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Stents Liberadores de FármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are limited data about determinant factors of target lesion failure (TLF) in lesions after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a drug-coated balloon (DCB) for de novo coronary artery lesions, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings. AIMS: The present study aims to investigate the associated factors of TLF in de novo coronary artery lesions with DCB treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 328 de novo coronary artery lesions in 328 patients who had undergone PCI with a DCB. All lesions had been treated without a stent, and both pre- and post-PCI OCT had been carried out. Patients were divided into two groups, with or without TLF, which was defined as a composite of culprit lesion-related cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation, and the associated factors of TLF were assessed. RESULTS: At the median follow-up period of 460 days, TLF events occurred in 31 patients (9.5%) and were associated with patients requiring haemodialysis (HD; 29.0% vs 10.8%), with a severely calcified lesion (median maximum calcium arc 215° vs 104°), and with the absence of OCT medial dissection (16.1% vs 60.9%) as opposed to those without TLF events. In Cox multivariable logistic regression analysis, HD (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-5.11; p=0.049), maximum calcium arc (per 90°, HR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.05-1.72; p=0.02), and the absence of post-PCI medial dissection on OCT (HR: 8.24, 95% CI: 3.15-21.6; p<0.001) were independently associated with TLF. CONCLUSIONS: In de novo coronary artery lesions that received DCB treatment, factors associated with TLF were being on HD, the presence of a severely calcified lesion, and the absence of post-PCI medial dissection.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Infarto del Miocardio/etiologíaAsunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Humanos , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents Liberadores de FármacosAsunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Paclitaxel , Placa Aterosclerótica , Humanos , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents Liberadores de FármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the outcomes with limus drug-coated balloons (DCBs) vs paclitaxel DCBs were small and underpowered for clinical endpoints. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes with limus DCBs vs paclitaxel DCBs for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: An electronic search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed through January 2024 for RCTs comparing limus DCBs vs paclitaxel DCBs for PCI. The primary endpoint was clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoints were late angiographic findings. Summary estimates were constructed using a random effects model. RESULTS: Six RCTs with 821 patients were included; 446 patients received a limus DCB, and 375 patients received a paclitaxel DCB. There was no difference between limus DCBs and paclitaxel DCBs in the incidence of TLR at a mean of 13.4 months (10.3% vs 7.8%; risk ratio [RR]: 1.32; 95% CI: 0.84-2.08). Subgroup analysis suggested no significant interaction among studies for de novo coronary lesions vs in-stent restenosis (Pinteraction = 0.58). There were no differences in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiac mortality, or target vessel myocardial infarction between groups. However, limus DCBs were associated with a higher risk of binary restenosis (RR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.14-3.12), late lumen loss (mean difference = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.03-0.28), and a smaller minimum lumen diameter (mean difference = -0.12; 95% CI: -0.22 to -0.02) at late follow-up. In addition, late lumen enlargement occurred more frequently (50% vs 27.5%; RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45-0.77) with paclitaxel DCBs. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing DCB-only PCI, there were no differences in the risk of clinically driven TLR and other clinical outcomes between limus DCBs and paclitaxel DCBs. However, paclitaxel DCBs were associated with better late angiographic outcomes. These findings support the need for future trials to establish the role of new-generation limus DCBs for PCI.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Catéteres Cardíacos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Paclitaxel , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/mortalidad , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Catéteres Cardíacos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Humanos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Diseño de Equipo , Stents Liberadores de FármacosRESUMEN
A 32-year-old man, who was treated for T-cell lymphoma, presented in cardiac arrest. He had been treated for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was initiated immediately. We diagnosed him as non-ST elevated myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography demonstrated the occlusion of the trifurcation in the proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD). We failed to advance the first guidewire into the distal LAD by angio-based conventional wiring. Intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) of the proximal diagonal branch revealed two diaphragms separating the distal lumen without connection, which looks like lotus root-like appearance. We quickly penetrated the plaque using IVUS-based real-time 3D wiring using the tip detection method. The contrast injection via the microcatheter showed the distal diagonal branch (D2). After the balloon dilation in D2, IVUS image revealed a torn plaque between D2 and the distal LAD. Subsequently we advanced the guidewire to the distal LAD using IVUS-based real-time 3D wiring using the tip detection method through the tear of the plaque. Finally, we successfully performed the revascularization of LAD in a preferable procedure time. The patient recovered well and was discharged 39 days after cardiac arrest. This case highlights the efficacy of IVUS-based real-time 3D wiring using the tip detection method even in the emergent and challenging situation.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Oclusión Coronaria , Paro Cardíaco , Placa Aterosclerótica , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Oclusión Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión Coronaria/terapia , Oclusión Coronaria/fisiopatología , Imagenología Tridimensional , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Valor Predictivo de las PruebasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Debulking devices are often followed by a scoring or cutting balloon in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for severely calcified lesions. However, there are limited data on balloon preparation after orbital atherectomy (OA) assessed using optical coherence tomography (OCT). AIM: We aimed to compare the effects of a novel scoring and cutting balloon on calcified coronary lesions with OCT. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 38 patients (38 lesions) who underwent PCI with a scoring or a cutting balloon after OA. All patients underwent pre-PCI, preballooning, postballooning, and post-PCI OCT imaging. We divided the patients into novel scoring-balloon (group A: n = 22) and cutting-balloon (group B: n = 16) groups and compared the OCT findings, including minimum lumen area (MLA) and expansion ratio (MLA divided by mean reference lumen area). RESULTS: The mean patient age was 76.1 ± 8.7 years; 71.5% were male. There were no significant differences in patient background between both groups. Regarding procedural characteristics, the maximum balloon pressure was significantly higher in group A (median 23 atm, interquartile range [IQR] 18-24 vs. 12 atm [IQR: 10-12], p < 0.01). Although a calcium score of 4 was more frequently observed in group A (86.4% vs. 62.5%, p = 0.12), post-PCI MLA was comparable between both groups (3.95 mm2 [IQR: 3.27-4.41] vs. 3.43 mm2 [IQR: 2.90-4.82], p = 0.63). Furthermore, the expansion ratio was significantly greater in group A (0.83 ± 0.20 vs. 0.68 ± 0.14, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite a higher calcium score, a larger expansion ratio was achieved in patients with a novel scoring balloon than in those with a cutting balloon after OA.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Aterectomía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Calcificación Vascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcificación Vascular/terapia , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Catéteres Cardíacos , Diseño de Equipo , Angiografía CoronariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Calcified lesions are one of the most challenging cases for PCI, where optimal angiographic results and satisfying outcomes are hard to achieve. METHODS: We evaluated the baseline clinical, procedures characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) who underwent coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and rotational atherectomy (RA). RESULTS: Respectively 152 and 238 patients who underwent IVL and RA are enrolled from January 2023 to November 2023. Regarding demographic characteristics, the gender proportion, medical history of PCI and smoke history among groups reach statistical significance. Left anterior descending and right coronary artery were the main vessels treated in both groups. The 2.5 and 3.0 mm IVL balloons and 1.5 mm burr were the most commonly used. 99.3% cases were successfully implanted drug-eluting stents after IVL balloon pre-treatment, which was higher than in the group treated with RA. During hospitalization, there were no serious adverse events in the IVL group, but there were two adverse events in the RA group. Procedural complications were higher in the RA group than the IVL group (5.5% vs. 0.7%, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: IVL appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of severe CAC lesions compared to RA.
Asunto(s)
Aterectomía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Litotricia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Calcificación Vascular , Humanos , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Calcificación Vascular/terapia , Calcificación Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Angiografía Coronaria , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to explain the current advancements in the treatment modalities for small vessel coronary artery disease (SVCAD) and de novo lesions post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), focusing on drug-coated stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB). Its goal is to address the lack of standards in the management of these lesions and to assess the potential of DCB as a preferential treatment strategy over DES in the long term. RECENT FINDINGS: Technological advancements have improved drug-eluting stents (DES) and drug-coated balloons (DCB) which offer a more promising avenue for managing SVCAD. According to new data, DCBs, initially recognized for their efficacy in preventing restenosis within three to five years of stent placement, may offer superior outcomes compared to DES in certain clinical scenarios. This review shows that DCBs have a favorable therapeutic profile in the treatment of SVCAD, and they could be considered as an alternative to DES. Although the initial data is compelling, definitive conclusions cannot be met without further large-scale, long-term clinical trials. The implication of these findings suggests a shift in the future of SVCAD management and requires additional research to substantiate the long-term benefits of DCB use in SVCAD. Should ongoing and future studies corroborate the current evidence, DCB could emerge as the standard of care for SVCAD, significantly influencing clinical practices and future research.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Reestenosis Coronaria/prevención & control , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/instrumentación , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Reestenosis Coronaria , Paclitaxel , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Stents/efectos adversos , Materiales Biocompatibles RevestidosAsunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Reestenosis Coronaria , Paclitaxel , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Stents/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Humanos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Angiografía Coronaria , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Catéteres Cardíacos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty seems a safe and effective option for specific de novo coronary lesions. However, the beneficial effect of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided DCB angioplasty in de novo lesions remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the benefits of IVUS guidance over angiography guidance during DCB angioplasty in de novo coronary lesions. METHODS: A total of 260 patients with high bleeding risk who had a de novo coronary lesion (reference vessel diameter 2.0-4.0 mm, and lesion length ≤15 mm) were randomly assigned to either an IVUS-guided or an angioplasty-guided DCB angioplasty group. The primary endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) at 7 months after procedure. The secondary endpoint was target vessel failure at 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 2 patients in the angiography-guided group and 7 patients in the IVUS-guided group underwent bailout stent implantation (P = 0.172). The primary endpoint of 7-month LLL was 0.03 ± 0.52 mm with angiography guidance vs -0.10 ± 0.34 mm with IVUS guidance (mean difference 0.14 mm; 95% CI: 0.02-0.26; P = 0.025). IVUS guidance was also associated with a larger 7-month minimal lumen diameter (2.06 ± 0.62 mm vs 1.75 ± 0.63 mm; P < 0.001) and a smaller diameter stenosis (28.15% ± 13.88% vs 35.83% ± 17.69%; P = 0.001) compared with angiography guidance. Five target vessel failures occurred at 6 months, with 4 (3.1%) in the angiography-guided group and 1 (0.8%) in the IVUS-guided group (P = 0.370). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that IVUS-guided DCB angioplasty is associated with a lower LLL in patients with a de novo coronary lesion compared with angiography guidance. (Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Angiography Guided Drug-Coated Balloon [ULTIMATE-III]; NCT04255043).