RESUMEN
Olfaction may play a restricted role in human behavior, yet paradoxically, its absence in anosmia is associated with diverse deleterious outcomes, culminating in reduced life expectancy. The mammalian nose serves two purposes: olfaction and breathing. Because respiratory patterns are impacted by odors, we hypothesized that nasal respiratory airflow may be altered in anosmia. We apply a wearable device that precisely logs nasal airflow for 24-hour-long sessions in participants with isolated congenital anosmia and controls. We observe significantly altered patterns of respiratory nasal airflow in anosmia in wake and in sleep. These differences allow classification of anosmia at 83% accuracy using the respiratory trace alone. Patterns of respiratory airflow have pronounced impact on health, emotion and cognition. We therefore suggest that a portion of the deleterious outcomes associated with anosmia may be attributed to altered patterns of respiratory nasal airflow rather than a direct result of lost odor perception per se.
Asunto(s)
Anosmia , Respiración , Olfato , Humanos , Adulto , Olfato/fisiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anosmia/fisiopatología , Sueño/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Odorantes , Adulto Joven , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Nariz/fisiopatología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Trastornos del Olfato/congénitoRESUMEN
The association of anosmia/ageusia with a positive severe respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test is well-established, suggesting these symptoms are reliable indicators of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. This study investigates the clinical characteristics and systemic inflammatory markers in hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Taiwan, focusing on those with anosmia/ageusia. We conducted a retrospective observational study on 231 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (alpha variant) from April to July 2021. Clinical symptoms, dyspnea grading, and laboratory investigations, including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios (NLRs), platelet-lymphocyte ratios (PLRs), and ANDC scores (an early warning score), were analyzed. Cough (64.1%), fever (58.9%), and dyspnea (56.3%) were the most common symptoms, while anosmia/ageusia affected 9% of patients. Those with anosmia/ageusia were younger, had lower BMI, lower systemic inflammatory markers, and better ANDC scores than those without these symptoms. Female patients exhibited lower NLR values and ANDC scores compared to male patients (all p < 0.05). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated significant associations between NLR and CRP and ferritin levels (all p < 0.01), and between PLR and ESR and ferritin levels (p < 0.01). Categorized ANDC scores significantly correlated with the total hospital length of stay (all p < 0.05). Despite ethnic differences in the prevalence of anosmia/ageusia, our study highlights similar clinical presentations and inflammatory profiles to those observed in Western countries. The ANDC score effectively predicted hospital stay duration. These findings suggest that anosmia/ageusia may be associated with less severe disease and a lower inflammatory response, particularly in younger and female patients. The ANDC score can serve as a valuable prognostic tool in assessing the severity and expected hospital stay of COVID-19 patients.
Asunto(s)
Anosmia , COVID-19 , Hospitalización , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Adulto , Ageusia , Inflamación/sangre , Linfocitos , Taiwán/epidemiología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/sangre , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/sangre , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/diagnósticoRESUMEN
COVID-19 pandemic brought chemosensory impairment to the forefront of medicine, revealing gaps in the knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms, true prevalence and preventive/therapeutic alternatives. This is a sub-study of the ORCHESTRA cohort focusing on post-COVID-19 chemosensory symptoms. Risk factors for neurosensorial cluster of post-COVID-19 syndrome (NSc-PCS) were assessed through multivariable analysis. Psychophysical validated tests were applied on a sub-population of 50 patients. Qualitative chemosensory symptoms as well as nasal and oral chemesthesis were evaluated through anamnestic interview and the quality of life through the SF-36 questionnaire. Chemosensory symptoms evolution and olfactory training's outcome were assessed through phone-call interviews. Out of 1187 patients (female, N = 630), 550 (47%) presented NSc-PCS, with a lower risk for older age and monoclonal antibodies treatment, and a higher risk in females (p < 0.001). Out of the 50 patients evaluated with psychophysical tests, 66% showed smell reduction with a qualitative alteration in 50% of hyposmic and 35% of normosmic patients. Hypogeusia was present in 14 (28%) of the patients assessed, with 56% showing a qualitative alteration; 53% of normogeusic patients presented qualitative disorders. NSc-PCS has a complex, fluctuating, multifaceted presentation. Quantifying and characterizing COVID-19-related chemosensory impairment is key to understand underlying mechanisms and to develop preventive and therapeutic treatment.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos del Olfato , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Trastornos del Olfato/virología , Trastornos del Olfato/fisiopatología , Anciano , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Anosmia/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Olfato/fisiología , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES: Severe hyposmia (SH) is a prodromal symptom of dementia associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) caused by Lewy bodies deposited in the limbic regions that connect the frontal and temporal lobes. We aimed to clarify the association between hyposmia and frontal lobe dysfunction (FLD) among patients with PD. METHODS: Patients with PD and Hoehn & Yahr stage 1-3 at on-periods without apparent dementia were screened. FLD was defined as a score of ≤14 on the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). SH was defined as an average recognition threshold >4 in the T&T Olfactometer. For each subscore, a recognition score of ≥4 was defined as SH. We examined whether SH and its subscores were associated with FLD and evaluated which FAB subscore might be lower in PD patients with SH using Poisson regression analysis with a robust variance estimator. RESULTS: We included 189 patients (median age, 68 years; 107 [57 %] male). FLD was observed in 53 (28 %) patients. Multivariable analysis showed that SH (PR 1.789, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 1.115-2.872, p = 0.016) was associated with FLD. Regarding odor domains, only SH for fruity smells was associated with FLD (PR 1.970, 95 % CI 1.306-2.972, p = 0.001). Patients with SH had a higher subscore only for FAB-1 (similarity [conceptualization], p = 0.030), indicating linguistically mediated executive dysfunction. CONCLUSION: In patients with PD, SH is associated with FLD, especially with linguistically mediated executive dysfunction. Particularly, SH for fruity smells may be a sensitive indicator of FLD.
Asunto(s)
Anosmia , Lóbulo Frontal , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lóbulo Frontal/fisiopatología , Lóbulo Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Anosmia/etiología , Anosmia/fisiopatología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Pruebas NeuropsicológicasRESUMEN
Olfactory dysfunction is a common non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease(PD) and may hold valuable insights into the disease's underlying pathophysiology. This study aimed to investigate cortical morphometry alterations in PD patients with severe hyposmia(PD-SH) and mild hyposmia(PD-MH) using surface-based morphometry(SBM) methods. Participants included 36 PD-SH patients, 38 PD-MH patients, and 40 healthy controls(HCs). SBM analysis revealed distinct patterns of cortical alterations in PD-SH and PD-MH patients. PD-MH patients exhibited reduced cortical thickness in the right supramarginal gyrus, while PD-SH patients showed widespread cortical thinning in regions including the bilateral pericalcarine cortex, bilateral lingual gyrus, left inferior parietal cortex, left lateral occipital cortex, right pars triangularis, right cuneus, and right superior parietal cortex. Moreover, PD-SH patients displayed reduced cortical thickness in the right precuneus compared to PD-MH patients. Fractal dimension analysis indicated increased cortical complexity in PD-MH patients' right superior temporal cortex and right supramarginal gyrus, as well as decreased complexity in the bilateral postcentral cortex, left superior parietal cortex, and right precentral cortex. Similarly, cortical gyrification index and cortical sulcal depth exhibited heterogeneous patterns of changes in PD-SH and PD-MH patients compared to HCs. These findings underscore the multifaceted nature of olfactory impairment in PD, with distinct patterns of cortical morphometry alterations associated with different degrees of hyposmia. The observed discrepancies in brain regions showing alterations reflect the complexity of PD's pathophysiology. These insights contribute to a deeper understanding of olfactory dysfunction in PD and provide potential avenues for early diagnosis and targeted interventions.
Asunto(s)
Anosmia , Corteza Cerebral , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/patología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Corteza Cerebral/patología , Corteza Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Anosmia/patología , Trastornos del Olfato/patología , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Trastornos del Olfato/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastornos del Olfato/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Olfactory perception is an important physiological function for human well-being and health. Loss of olfaction, or anosmia, caused by viral infections such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has received considerable attention, especially in persistent cases that take a long time to recover. This review discusses the integration of different components of the olfactory epithelium to serve as a structural and functional unit and explores how they are affected during viral infections, leading to the development of olfactory dysfunction. The review mainly focused on the role of receptors mediating the disruption of olfactory signal transduction pathways such as angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), transmembrane protease serine type 2 (TMPRSS2), neuropilin 1 (NRP1), basigin (CD147), olfactory, transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1), purinergic, and interferon gamma receptors. Furthermore, the compromised function of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection and its contribution to olfactory dysfunction are also discussed. Collectively, this review provides fundamental information about the many types of receptors that may modulate olfaction and participate in olfactory dysfunction. It will help to understand the underlying pathophysiology of virus-induced anosmia, which may help in finding and designing effective therapies targeting molecules involved in viral invasion and olfaction. To the best of our knowledge, this is the only review that covered all the receptors potentially involved in, or mediating, the disruption of olfactory signal transduction pathways during COVID-19 infection. This wide and complex spectrum of receptors that mediates the pathophysiology of olfactory dysfunction reflects the many ways in which anosmia can be therapeutically managed.
Asunto(s)
Anosmia , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/metabolismo , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/fisiopatología , COVID-19/virología , Anosmia/fisiopatología , Anosmia/etiología , Anosmia/metabolismo , Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2/metabolismo , Mucosa Olfatoria/metabolismo , Mucosa Olfatoria/virología , Transducción de Señal , Serina Endopeptidasas/metabolismo , Neuropilina-1/metabolismo , Basigina/metabolismo , Canales Catiónicos TRPV/metabolismoRESUMEN
Patients recovering from COVID-19 commonly exhibit cognitive and brain alterations, yet the specific neuropathological mechanisms and risk factors underlying these alterations remain elusive. Given the significant global incidence of COVID-19, identifying factors that can distinguish individuals at risk of developing brain alterations is crucial for prioritizing follow-up care. Here, we report findings from a sample of patients consisting of 73 adults with a mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection without signs of respiratory failure and 27 with infections attributed to other agents and no history of COVID-19. The participants underwent cognitive screening, a decision-making task, and MRI evaluations. We assessed for the presence of anosmia and the requirement for hospitalization. Groups did not differ in age or cognitive performance. Patients who presented with anosmia exhibited more impulsive alternative changes after a shift in probabilities (r = - 0.26, p = 0.001), while patients who required hospitalization showed more perseverative choices (r = 0.25, p = 0.003). Anosmia correlated with brain measures, including decreased functional activity during the decision-making task, thinning of cortical thickness in parietal regions, and loss of white matter integrity. Hence, anosmia could be a factor to be considered when identifying at-risk populations for follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Anosmia , Encéfalo , COVID-19 , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/fisiopatología , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , COVID-19/patología , Anosmia/etiología , Anosmia/fisiopatología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/patología , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones , Cognición/fisiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare, using state-of-the-art psychophysical tests, the olfactory function of patients complaining and not complaining of olfactory hypersensitivity. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional. SETTING: The Smell and Taste Center at the University of Pennsylvania. METHODS: University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) scores were obtained from 148 patients complaining of hyperosmia and 494 patients with no such complaints; detection threshold test scores were obtained from 77 and 483 patients of these respective groups. The effects of subject group, age, and sex on the test scores were assessed using analyses of variance. Categorical variables were evaluated by χ2. Responses to items within a detailed intake questionnaire, for example, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), were also evaluated. RESULTS: Unexpectedly, those complaining of hyperosmia had lower olfactory test scores than those with no such complaints (respective UPSIT means [95% confidence interval [CIs]] = 27.86 (26.85, 28.87) and 32.19 (31.67, 32.71); P < .001; respective threshold means (log vol/vol) = -4.49 (-4.89, -4.09) and -5.22 (-5.36, -5.06); P < .001). Remarkably, 70.95% of the self-identified hyperosmics exhibited mild to severe microsmia. The hyposmia complainers also exhibited elevated BDI scores (11.02 [9.53, 12.51] vs 7.58 [6.80, 8.34]). CONCLUSION: When objectively tested, many patients who complain of hypersensitivity to odors are actually less sensitive to them. The basis of this phenomenon is unclear. It could reflect the presence of emotionally disturbing altered smell sensations, or one or more comorbidities, such as hypochondria or osmophobia. These findings point to the importance of objective testing of persons with complaints of chemosensory dysfunction and reiterate the inaccuracy of self-reports.
Asunto(s)
Anosmia , Trastornos del Olfato , Autoinforme , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Trastornos del Olfato/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Anciano , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Olfato/fisiología , Umbral Sensorial/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Long COVID presents with diverse symptoms after COVID-19. Different clusters of symptoms have been reported; however, their persistence beyond 2 years after COVID-19 remains unclear. In this cohort study, we prospectively evaluated individuals with previous severe COVID-19 presenting with long COVID at a two-year follow-up. We characterized the included patients and performed a cluster analysis of symptoms through multiple correspondence analysis and hierarchical clustering. A total of 199 patients with long COVID were included. The median age was 58 years (48-69), 56% were male, and the median follow-up time since the COVID-19 diagnosis was 26 months (IQR: 25, 27). Three symptom clusters were identified: Cluster 1 is characterized by fatigue, myalgia/arthralgia, a low prevalence of symptoms, and a lack of specific symptoms; Cluster 2 is defined by a high prevalence of fatigue, myalgia/arthralgia, and cardiorespiratory symptoms, including palpitations, shortness of breath, cough, and chest pain; and Cluster 3 is demonstrated a high prevalence of ageusia, anosmia, fatigue, and cardiorespiratory symptoms. Our study reinforces the concept of symptom clustering in long COVID, providing evidence that these clusters may persist beyond two years after a COVID-19 diagnosis. This highlights the chronic and debilitating nature of long COVID and the importance of developing strategies to mitigate symptoms in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Artralgia , COVID-19 , Fatiga , Mialgia , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Sistema de Registros , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Anciano , Fatiga/etiología , Mialgia/etiología , Mialgia/fisiopatología , Artralgia/virología , Artralgia/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Prevalencia , Análisis por Conglomerados , Ageusia/epidemiología , Ageusia/etiología , Ageusia/virología , Anosmia/epidemiología , Anosmia/etiología , Disnea/fisiopatología , Disnea/virología , Disnea/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tos , Factores de Tiempo , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
The common cold, the flu, and the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have many symptoms in common. As such, without testing for severe-acute-respiratory-syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), it is difficult to conclude whether or not one is infected with SARS-CoV-2. The aim of the current study was to compare the presence and severity of COVID-19-related symptoms among those who tested positive or negative for the beta variant of SARS-CoV-2 (B.1.351) and identify the clinical presentation with the greatest likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. n = 925 individuals that were tested for SARS-CoV-2 at Dutch mass testing sites (i.e., test streets) were invited to complete a short online survey. The presence and severity of 17 COVID-19-related symptoms were assessed. In addition, mood, health correlates, and quality of life were assessed for the week before the test. Of the sample, n = 88 tested positive and n = 837 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Individuals who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 reported experiencing a significantly greater number, as well as greater overall symptom severity, compared to individuals who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. A binary logistic regression analysis revealed that increased severity levels of congestion, coughing, shivering, or loss of smell were associated with an increase in the odds of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, whereas an increase in the severity levels of runny nose, sore throat, or fatigue were associated with an increase in the odds of testing negative for SARS-CoV-2. No significant differences in mood or health correlates were found between those who tested positive or negative for SARS-CoV-2, except for a significantly higher stress score among those who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. In conclusion, individuals that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 experienced a significantly greater number and more severe COVID-19-related symptoms compared to those who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. Experiencing shivering and loss of smell may be the best indicators for increased likelihood of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/virología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven , Anciano , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Prueba de COVID-19/métodos , Adolescente , Anosmia/diagnóstico , Anosmia/virología , Tos/virologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This longitudinal prospective study aims to investigate the potential of circulating calprotectin (cCLP) as a biomarker in persistent olfactory dysfunctions following COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with persistent hyposmia or anosmia post COVID-19 were enrolled (HT0) and re-evaluated after three months of olfactory training (HT1). Two control groups included 18 subjects without olfactory defects post COVID-19 (CG1) and 18 healthy individuals (CG2). Nasal brushing of the olfactory cleft and blood collection were performed to assess circulating calprotectin levels. RESULTS: Higher calprotectin levels were observed in serum and nasal supernatant of hyposmic patients (HT0) compared to control groups (CG1 and CG2). Post-olfactory training (HT1), olfactory function improved significantly, paralleled by decreased calprotectin levels in serum and nasal samples. Circulating calprotectin holds potential as a biomarker in persistent olfactory dysfunctions after COVID-19. The decrease in calprotectin levels post-olfactory training implies a role in monitoring and evaluating treatment responses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to the growing literature on potential biomarkers in post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunctions and underscore the importance of investigating novel biomarkers for personalized patient management. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to validate the application of calprotectin assay in nasal diseases and its correlation with nasal cytology.
Asunto(s)
Anosmia , Biomarcadores , COVID-19 , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anosmia/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/complicaciones , Complejo de Antígeno L1 de Leucocito/sangre , Estudios Longitudinales , Trastornos del Olfato/sangre , Trastornos del Olfato/diagnóstico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) were on the front line of the COVID-19 outbreak. Identifying clinical profiles in COVID-19 might improve patient care and enable closer monitoring of at-risk profiles. OBJECTIVES: To identify COVID-19 profiles in a population of adult primary care patients, and to determine whether the profiles were associated with negative outcomes and persistent symptoms. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In a prospective multicentre study, 44 GPs from multiprofessional primary care practices in the Paris area of France recruited 340 consecutive adult patients (median age: 47 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 during the first two waves of the epidemic. METHOD AND OUTCOME: A latent class (LC) analysis with 11 indicators (clinical signs and symptoms) was performed. The resulting profiles were characterised by a 3-month composite outcome (COVID-19-related hospital admission and/or death) and persistent symptoms three and 6 months after inclusion. RESULTS: We identified six profiles: 'paucisymptomatic' (LC1, 9%), 'anosmia and/or ageusia' (LC2, 12.9%), 'influenza-like syndrome with anosmia and ageusia' (LC3, 15.5%), 'influenza-like syndrome without anosmia or ageusia' (LC4, 24.5%), 'influenza-like syndrome with respiratory impairment' (LC5) and a 'complete form' (LC6, 17.7%). At 3 months, 7.4% of the patients were hospitalised (with higher rates in LC5), and 18% had persistent symptoms (with higher rates in LC5 and LC6). At 6 months, 6.4% of the patients had persistent symptoms, with no differences between LCs. CONCLUSION: Our findings might help GPs to identify patients at risk of persistent COVID-19 symptoms and hospital admission and then set up procedures for closer monitoring.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Medicina General , Análisis de Clases Latentes , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Paris/epidemiología , Anosmia/epidemiología , Ageusia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
SCENTinel, a rapid smell test designed to screen for olfactory disorders, including anosmia (no ability to smell an odor) and parosmia (distorted sense of smell), measures 4 components of olfactory function: detection, intensity, identification, and pleasantness. Each test card contains one of 9 odorant mixtures. Some people born with genetic insensitivities to specific odorants (i.e. specific anosmia) may fail the test if they cannot smell an odorant but otherwise have a normal sense of smell. However, using odorant mixtures has largely been found to prevent this from happening. To better understand whether genetic differences affect SCENTinel test results, we asked genetically informative adult participants (twins or triplets, Nâ =â 630; singletons, Nâ =â 370) to complete the SCENTinel test. A subset of twins (nâ =â 304) also provided a saliva sample for genotyping. We examined data for differences between the 9 possible SCENTinel odors; effects of age, sex, and race on SCENTinel performance, test-retest variability; and heritability using both structured equation modeling and SNP-based statistical methods. None of these strategies provided evidence for specific anosmia for any of the odors, but ratings of pleasantness were, in part, genetically determined (h2â =â 0.40) and were nominally associated with alleles of odorant receptors (e.g. OR2T33 and OR1G1; Pâ <â 0.001). These results provide evidence that using odorant mixtures protected against effects of specific anosmia for ratings of intensity but that ratings of pleasantness showed effects of inheritance, possibly informed by olfactory receptor genotypes.
Asunto(s)
Odorantes , Olfato , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Odorantes/análisis , Olfato/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Olfato/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Olfato/genética , Adulto Joven , Percepción Olfatoria , Anciano , Genotipo , Anosmia/diagnóstico , Anosmia/genéticaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Olfactory symptoms have been reported as particular in COVID-19 patients. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and analyze the existing evidence on the monitoring loss of sense of smell and taste in COVID-19 patients, and for how long symptoms persist after the virus is no longer active in the organism. METHODS: A search was implemented in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA, and the risk of bias was assessed through the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The review protocol is registered in PROSPERO. RESULTS: Our systematic review included data from 14 articles with a total of 2143 participants. The most reported sensory symptom of COVID-19 was anosmia, which was detected in 1499 patients, being the only symptom to appear in all studies. Ageusia was detected in 595 patients, dysgeusia in 514 patients, and hyposmia in 209 patients. The studies provided the number of 729 patients with sensory symptoms during the acute COVID-19 infection of 15 days, and 1020 patients with lasting sensory symptoms, presenting sensory dysfunctions after the average latent period of 15 days of the acute COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION: Evidence points to the loss or dysfunction of taste and smell as one of the symptoms of COVID-19 persisting for an average time of 15 days, with 44% of COVID-19 patients with persistent symptoms for more than 15 days. Nevertheless, most studies do not perform a follow-up with those patients. Therefore, further research on sensory symptoms and their follow-up is required.
INTRODUÇÃO: Sintomas olfativos foram relatados como específicos em pacientes com COVID-19. OBJETIVO: Sintetizar e analisar as evidências existentes sobre o monitoramento da perda de olfato e paladar em pacientes com COVID-19 e por quanto tempo os sintomas persistem. MÉTODOS: Foi realizada uma busca nas bases de dados PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Science Direct e Web of Science. Esta revisão sistemática e metanálise foi realizada de acordo com o PRISMA, e o risco de viés foi avaliado por meio da Escala de Newcastle-Ottawa. O protocolo de revisão está registrado no PROSPERO. RESULTADOS: Nossa revisão sistemática incluiu dados de 14 artigos com um total de 2143 participantes. O sintoma sensorial mais comumente relatado de COVID-19 foi anosmia, detectado em 1.499 pacientes, sendo o único sintoma a aparecer em todos os estudos. Ageusia foi detectada em 595 pacientes, disgeusia em 514 pacientes e hiposmia em 209 pacientes. Os estudos forneceram o número de 729 pacientes com sintomas sensoriais por 15 dias durante a infecção aguda por COVID-19 e 1020 pacientes com sintomas sensoriais duradouros, apresentando disfunções sensoriais após o período latente médio de 15 dias da infecção aguda por COVID-19. CONCLUSÃO: Evidências apontam a perda ou disfunção do paladar e olfato como um dos sintomas da COVID-19 persistindo por um tempo médio de 15 dias, com 44% dos pacientes com COVID-19 com sintomas persistentes por mais de 15 dias. No entanto, a maioria dos estudos não realiza acompanhamento desses pacientes. Portanto, mais pesquisas sobre sintomas sensoriais e seu acompanhamento são necessárias.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Ageusia , Anosmia , COVID-19 , DisgeusiaRESUMEN
Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is not uncommon following viral infection. Herein, we explore the interplay of host genetics with viral correlates in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)- and long COVID-related OD, and its diagnosis and treatment that remain challenging. Two genes associated with olfaction, UGT2A1 and UGT2A2, appear to be involved in COVID-19-related anosmia, a hallmark symptom of acute infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), particularly in the early stages of the pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 infects olfactory support cells, sustentacular and Bowman gland cells, that surround olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) in the olfactory epithelium (OE) where the initial step of odor detection takes place. Anosmia primarily arises from the infection of support cells of the OE, followed by the deciliation and disruption of OE integrity, typically without OSN infection. Through the projected axons of OSNs, the virus could theoretically reach the olfactory bulb and brain, but current evidence points against this route. Intriguingly, SARS-CoV-2 infection of support cells leads to profound alterations in the nuclear architecture of OSNs, leading to the downregulation of odorant receptor-related genes, e.g., of Adcy3. Viral factors associated with the development of OD include spike protein aminoacidic changes, e.g., D614G, the first substitution that was selected early during SARS-CoV-2 evolution. More recent variants of the Omicron family are less likely to cause OD compared to Delta or Alpha, although OD has been associated with a milder disease course. OD is one of the most prevalent post-acute neurologic symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The tens of millions of people worldwide who have lingering problems with OD wait eagerly for effective new treatments that will restore their sense of smell which adds value to their quality of life.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos del Olfato , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/complicaciones , Humanos , Trastornos del Olfato/fisiopatología , Anosmia/fisiopatología , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Mucosa Olfatoria/virología , Mucosa Olfatoria/patología , Neuronas Receptoras OlfatoriasRESUMEN
Background: Rising global concerns about COVID-19 recently gained more research attention due to the ease of person-to-person transmission, various symptoms after healing, and the shortage of effective antiviral therapy. The study aims to analyze post-COVID conditions and clinical manifestations of cardiovascular lesions in patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. Methods: A practical examination of post-COVID conditions manifestation was conducted in a prospective cohort study, involving 250 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between June 1, 2021, and August 31, 2021. The study specifically focused on analyzing the cardiovascular effects of COVID-19, utilizing data from a subgroup of 200 patients previously discharged from the hospital with elevated troponin levels. The cardiovascular variables assessed included tachycardia, ischemia, heart attack, myocarditis, hypertension, blood clots, and heart failure. Results: It has been observed that among surviving patients, the following symptoms persisted: anosmia/ageusia (59%), severe dyspnea (36.7%), palpitations and complaints related to the cardiovascular sys-tem (15.8%), headaches (13.2%), arthralgia (11.7%), myalgia (9.8%), and hair problems (≥5%). By the 60th day, a reduction in symptoms by 5-10% was noted, and by the 90th day, a decrease in activity by 25-35% was observed. Patients aged 40-60 years exhibited the highest percentage of cardiovascular diseases (75%). Conclusions: Consequently, the SARS-CoV-2 virus underscores the critical importance of cardiological attention in patient care. Cardiac screening results in individuals with COVID-19 reveal a significant prevalence of serious heart problems, affecting over half of the patients. This emphasizes the necessity for heightened vigilance and specialized cardiac care when managing patients with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Anciano , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Anosmia/etiología , Mialgia/etiología , Artralgia/etiología , Cefalea/etiología , Disnea/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) causes motor and non-motor symptoms such as hyposmia, which is evaluated through olfactory tests in the clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using the modified Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (mCCCRC) olfactory test and to compare its performance with the Sniffin' Sticks-12 (SS-12, Burghart Messtechnik GmbH, Wedel, Germany) test. METHODS: A transversal case-control study in which the patients were divided into the PD group (PDG) and the control group (CG). The cost and difficulty in handling substances to produce the mCCCRC test kits were evaluated. Sociodemographic characteristics, smoking habits, past coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections, self-perception of odor sense, and cognition through the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were also evaluated. The PDG was scored by part III of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) and the Hoehn and Yahr Scale (H&Y) scale. Correlations were assessed through the Spearman rank correlation coefficient test (ρ, or rho). RESULTS: The mCCCRC test was easily manufactured and handled at a cost ten times lower compared with the SS-12. The groups (PDG: n = 34; CG: n = 38) were similar in terms of age, sex, level of schooling, smoking habits, and history of COVID-19. The tests results showed moderate correlation (rho = 0.65; p < 0.0001). The CG presented better cognitive performance and scored better in both tests (p < 0.0001). There was a tendency for a negative correlation with age, but good correlation with the MoCA (p = 0.0029). The results of the PDG group showed no correlation with olfactory results and motor performance or disease duration. The self-perception of hyposmia was low in both groups. CONCLUSION: The mCCCRC is an easy-to-apply and inexpensive method that demonstrated a similar performance to that of the SS-12 in evaluating olfaction in PD patients and healthy controls.
ANTECEDENTES: A doença de Parkinson (DP) cursa com sintomas motores e não motores como a hiposmia, que é avaliada por diferentes testes olfativos na prática clínica. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a viabilidade do teste olfatório Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center modificado (mCCCRC) e compará-la à do teste Sniffin' Sticks-12 (SS-12, Burghart Messtechnik GmbH, Wedel, Alemanha). MéTODOS: Estudo transversal de caso-controle em que os pacientes foram divididos no grupo DP (GDP) e no grupo controle (GC). O custo e as dificuldades no manuseio das substâncias necessárias para a produção dos kits do teste mCCCRC foram avaliados. Características sociodemográficas, tabagismo, histórico de infecção por doença do coronavírus 2019 (coronavírus disease 2019, COVID-19, em inglês), autopercepção do olfato e cognição pelo Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) também foram avaliados. O GDP foi avaliado pela parte III da Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) e pela escala de Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y). As correlações utilizaram o teste do coeficiente de correlação de postos de Spearman (ρ, ou rho). RESULTADOS: O mCCCRC foi facilmente poroduzido e manipulado com custo dez vezes inferior ao do SS-12. Os grupos (GDP: n = 34; GC: n = 38) eram similares em termos de idade, sexo, escolaridade, tabagismo e histórico de COVID-19. Os resultados obtidos em ambos os testes mostraram excelente correlação (rho = 0.65; p < 0.0001). O GC teve um desempenho cognitivo melhor e pontuou melhor nos dois testes (p < 0.0001). Houve uma tendência a uma correlação negativa com a idade, mas boa correlação com a pontuação no MoCA (p = 0.0029). Os resultados olfativos do GDP não mostraram correlação com desempenho motor ou duração da doença. A autopercepção de hiposmia foi baixa em ambos os grupos. CONCLUSãO: O mCCCRC é um teste de fácil aplicação, baixo custo, e apresentou um desempenho semelhante ao do SS-12 na avaliação olfativa de pacientes com DP e controles saudáveis.
Asunto(s)
Anosmia , COVID-19 , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/complicaciones , Anosmia/etiología , Anosmia/fisiopatología , Estudios Transversales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Estudios de Factibilidad , Olfato/fisiología , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-Covid, characterized by persistent symptoms following acute Covid-19 infection, represents a complex challenge for the scientific community. Among the most common and debilitating manifestations, cognitive fog is a neurological disorder characterized by mental confusion and cognitive difficulties. In this study, we investigated the long-term effects of previous Covid-19 infection on cortical brain activity in patients experiencing cognitive fog symptoms in the medium and long term. METHODS: A total of 40 subjects (20 females and 20 males) aged between 45 and 70 years (mean age (M) = 59.78, standard deviation (SD) = 12.93) participated in this study. This sample included individuals with symptoms of cognitive fog, both with and without anosmia, and a control group comprised of healthy subjects. All electroencephalography (EEG) data were collected in two sessions, 1 month and 8 months after recovery from Covid-19, to measure the neurophysiological parameters of P300 and beta band rhythms. RESULTS: The results revealed significant differences in the neurophysiological parameters of P300 and beta band rhythms in subjects affected by cognitive fog, and these alterations persist even 8 months after recovery from Covid-19. Interestingly, no significant differences were observed between the participants with anosmia and without anosmia associated with cognitive fog. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide a significant contribution to understanding the long-term effects of Covid-19 on the brain and have important implications for future interventions aimed at managing and treating brain fog symptoms. The longitudinal assessment of cortical brain activity helps highlight the persistent impact of the virus on the neurological health of Long-Covid patients.
Asunto(s)
Anosmia , COVID-19 , Corteza Cerebral , Disfunción Cognitiva , Electroencefalografía , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anosmia/fisiopatología , Anosmia/etiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Corteza Cerebral/fisiopatología , Disfunción Cognitiva/fisiopatología , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Potenciales Relacionados con Evento P300/fisiología , Ritmo beta/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Data on the state of sense of smell in patients who had a new coronavirus infection caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus are currently reduced because of the impairment of the olfactory nerve system. There are practically no results in studies of disorders in the trigeminal nerve system. OBJECTIVE: Qualitative assessment of olfactory disorders after COVID-19 according to the system of olfactory and trigeminal nerves with a targeted assessment of the functional component of olfactory disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We examined 40 patients aged 19 to 66 who had a coronavirus infection. All patients underwent neurological, otorhinolaryngological examinations, olfactometry, filled out the hospital anxiety and depression scale. RESULTS: Anosmia was diagnosed in 5 (12.5%) patients, hyposmia in 21 (52.5%) patients, and normosmia in 14 (35%) patients. Formed: the 1st group - 14 patients (35%) with normogram according to olfactometry; the 2nd group - 26 patients (65%) with anosmia/hyposmia. In the 1st group, disorders of the anxiety-depressive spectrum were significantly more common. In the 2nd group, a low identification of odors was found, lying in the spectrum of fresh, sharp, unpleasant, irritating, compared with sweet and pleasant or neutral, which indicates a predominant lesion of the trigeminal system. CONCLUSION: In patients with complaints of impaired sense of smell after undergoing COVID-19, the possible functional nature of anosmia/hyposmia should be taken into account, which requires the referral of such patients to psychotherapeutic specialists, and the possible entry of olfactory disorders into the 'trigeminal' spectrum.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos del Olfato , Nervio Trigémino , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Trastornos del Olfato/fisiopatología , Trastornos del Olfato/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Olfato/virología , Nervio Trigémino/fisiopatología , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Olfato/fisiología , Olfatometría/métodos , Anosmia/etiología , Anosmia/fisiopatología , Federación de Rusia/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Nervio Trigémino/fisiopatología , Enfermedades del Nervio Trigémino/etiología , Enfermedades del Nervio Trigémino/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Olfactory dysfunction or dysautonomia is one of the earliest prodromal nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to investigate whether PD patients with dysautonomia and hyposmia at the de novo stage present different prognoses regarding PD dementia (PDD) conversion, motor complication development, and change in levodopa-equivalent doses (LED). METHODS: In this retrograde cohort study, we included 105 patients with newly diagnosed PD patients who underwent cross-cultural smell identification test (CC-SIT), autonomic function tests (AFT), and dopamine transporter (DAT) scan at the de novo stage. PD patients were divided into Hyposmia + /Dysautonomia + (H + /D +) and Hyposmia - /Dysautonomia - (H - /D -) groups depending on the result of AFT and CC-SIT. Baseline clinical, cognitive, imaging characteristics, longitudinal risks of PDD development and motor complication occurrence, and longitudinal LED changes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: When compared with the H - /D - group, the H + /D + group showed lower standardized uptake value ratios in all subregions, lower asymmetry index, and steeper ventral - dorsal gradient in the DAT scan. The H + /D + group exhibited poorer performance in frontal/executive function and a higher risk of PDD development. The risk of motor complications including levodopa-induced dyskinesia, wearing off, and freezing of gait, was comparable between the two groups. The analysis of longitudinal changes in LED using a linear mixed model showed that the increase of LED in the H + /D + group was more rapid. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PD patients with dysautonomia and hyposmia at the de novo stage show a higher risk of PD dementia conversion and rapid progression of motor symptoms.