Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 590
Filtrar
1.
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi ; 47(5): 475-480, 2024 May 12.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706072

RESUMEN

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA), posing a significant disease burden. Early TB screening in PLWHA is a key intervention to reduce transmission and control disease progression. ​Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) is a glycolipid of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) that can be detected in the urine of tuberculosis patients. LAM is useful for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis. This article reviews LAM and its application and limitations in the diagnosis of PLWHA, hoping to provide a reference for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in PLWHA.


Asunto(s)
Lipopolisacáridos , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Lipopolisacáridos/orina , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/inmunología , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/complicaciones , Antígenos Bacterianos/orina
2.
Future Microbiol ; 19(9): 783-793, 2024 Jun 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38592488

RESUMEN

Aim: A rapid and precise diagnostic method is crucial for timely intervention and management of tuberculosis. The present study compared the diagnostic accuracy of a novel lipoarabinomannan (LAM) antigen test, AIMLAM, for tuberculosis in urine samples. Methodology: The study subjected 106 TB suspects to smear microscopy, MGIT, GeneXpert and AIMLAM. Results: Among 106, smear microscopy identified 36 as positive (33%) (sensitivity; 70.93%, 95% CI (60.14-80.22%), while MGIT showed 38 positive (36.8%). GeneXpert detected 59 positives (sensitivity; 96.83, 95% CI (89.00-99.61%)). AIMLAM declared 61 as positive (57.5%) (sensitivity; 100.00, 95% CI (94.13-100.00%) and 45 as negative (42.5%). Conclusion: Overall, AIMLAM demonstrated better diagnostic accuracy than GeneXpert Assay, smear microscopy and MGIT liquid culture in urine samples.


This study describes a new way to detect tuberculosis, called AIMLAM. Unlike traditional methods that use sputum or blood, AIMLAM tests urine samples and bodily fluids. It is automated and uses easily accessible samples to identify a tuberculosis infection, so may be a convenient and noninvasive option for healthcare providers. The test shows promising results in terms of accuracy and sensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Lipopolisacáridos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tuberculosis , Humanos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/microbiología , Tuberculosis/orina , Lipopolisacáridos/orina , Lipopolisacáridos/análisis , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Microscopía/métodos , Adulto Joven , Anciano
3.
APMIS ; 131(3): 125-127, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36479708

RESUMEN

Infectious native aortic aneurysm (INAA) are rare but life-threatening infections. Early microbiological identification is crucial to initiate adequate therapy and decrease the peri-operative risk, but can be challenging when blood cultures remain negative. We describe two cases of pneumococcal INAA with negative blood cultures, diagnosed in the with the pneumococcal urinary antigen test.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta , Enfermedades Transmisibles , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cultivo de Sangre , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Infecciones Neumocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Transmisibles/tratamiento farmacológico , Antígenos Bacterianos/orina
4.
J Infect ; 85(2): 167-173, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35618153

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of pneumococcal urinary antigen test (UAT) usage on broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). METHODS: Patients admitted to 32 Swedish hospitals between 2011 and 2014 were retrospectively included from the Swedish National Quality Register of CAP. Using propensity score matched data, stratified by CRB-65 score, we studied the effect of performing UAT and of positive test results on treatment with broad-spectrum ß-lactam monotherapy (BSBM) and antibiotics with coverage for atypical bacteria compared to narrow-spectrum ß-lactam monotherapy (NSBM). RESULTS: UAT was performed for 4,995/14,590 (34.2%) patients, 603/4,995 (12.1%) of whom had positive test results. At day three, performing UAT was not associated with decreased use of BSBM (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.94-1.23) but was associated with increased atypical coverage among patients with CRB-65 score 2 (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.06-2.02). A positive UAT was associated with decreased BSBM use (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.60) and decreased atypical coverage (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.16-0.37), predominantly in non-severe CAP. At day one, performing UAT was associated with atypical coverage among patients with CRB-65 scores 2 (OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.69-3.98) and 3-4 (OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.55-8.79), and a positive test reduced the odds of BSBM treatment among CRB-65 score 3-4 patients (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.02-12.0). CONCLUSIONS: Performing UAT had no overall effect on decreasing the use of BSBM treatment by day three of hospitalization, yet non-severely ill patients with positive UAT results were less likely to be treated with BSBM and antibiotics with atypical coverage.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Neumonía Neumocócica , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Estudios de Cohortes , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Humanos , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Neumonía Neumocócica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Neumocócica/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Streptococcus pneumoniae , beta-Lactamas
5.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 19193, 2021 09 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34584117

RESUMEN

Outside of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, tuberculosis is the leading cause of infectious disease mortality globally. Currently, there is no commercially available point-of-care diagnostic that is rapid, inexpensive, and highly sensitive for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis disease. Here we describe the development and optimization of a novel, highly sensitive prototype bioelectronic tuberculosis antigen (BETA) assay to detect tuberculosis-specific antigen, CFP10, in small-volume serum and urine samples. In this proof-of-concept study we evaluated the performance of the BETA assay using clinical specimens collected from presumptive tuberculosis patients from three independent cohorts. Circulating CFP10 antigen was detected in ALL serum (n = 19) and urine (n = 3) samples from bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis patients who were untreated or had less than one week of treatment at time of serum collection, successfully identifying all culture positive tuberculosis patients. No CFP10 antigen was detected in serum (n = 7) or urine (n = 6) samples from individuals who were determined to be negative for tuberculosis disease. Additionally, antigen quantification using the BETA assay of paired serum samples collected from tuberculosis patients (n = 8) both before and after treatment initiation, indicate consistently declining within-person levels of CFP10 antigen during treatment. This novel, low-cost assay demonstrates potential as a rapid, non-sputum-based, point-of-care tool for the diagnosis of tuberculosis disease.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Fragmentos de Péptidos , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Antígenos Bacterianos/sangre , Antígenos Bacterianos/aislamiento & purificación , Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/inmunología , Fragmentos de Péptidos/sangre , Fragmentos de Péptidos/aislamiento & purificación , Fragmentos de Péptidos/orina , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/diagnóstico
6.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 101(1): 115457, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34271234

RESUMEN

The aim of the present study was to investigate the predictors of targeted therapy (TT) for pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia (PCAP) with a positive urinary antigen test (UAT) and compare the outcomes with those of nontargeted therapy. This prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive PCAP patients with a positive UAT who were hospitalized at Kurashiki Central Hospital from October 2010 to November 2019. A total of 286 patients were included. Of them, 56 patients (19.6%) were included in the TT group. On multivariate analysis, identification of Gram-positive diplococci by Gram stain (OR [95% CI]: 2.46 [1.32-4.63]) was a positive predictor, whereas aspiration pneumonia (0.17 [0.03-0.59]) and CURB-65 score (0.59 [0.42-0.81]) were negative predictors of TT. Initial treatment failure and 30-day mortality were not significantly different. The UAT is not used enough for TT, and TT for PCAP did not have worse outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Neumonía Neumocócica/tratamiento farmacológico , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/orina , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neumonía Neumocócica/orina , Estudios Prospectivos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 281, 2021 Mar 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33740905

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is a major global public health concern. Patients with tuberculosis who require critical care have a high mortality and delay in initiating antituberculous therapy is associated with increased mortality. Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) is a lipopolysaccharide found in the cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Urinary LAM may be used as a bedside diagnostic test for tuberculosis. METHODS: The study was a single centre, prospective observational study that compared the utility of urinary LAM with conventional tuberculosis diagnostic modalities in patients with suspected tuberculosis who required intensive care admission. Urinary LAM testing was performed using the Alere Determine TB LAM Ag lateral flow assay test strips. A patient was classified as having confirmed tuberculosis if they met the following criteria: a clinical presentation compatible with tuberculosis, with either a positive TB culture, a positive GeneXpert, or a histological diagnosis of tuberculosis. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in the study, with 12 having confirmed tuberculosis. All patients received mechanical ventilation, and the ICU mortality was 60%. Urinary LAM had a sensitivity of 50.0% (95% CI, 21.1 to 78.9%) and a specificity of 84.2% (95% CI, 68.8 to 94.0%) for confirmed tuberculosis. CONCLUSION: Urinary LAM allows for rapid bedside diagnosis of tuberculosis in critically ill patients. A positive urinary LAM should prompt consideration to initiate antituberculous treatment while the results of further diagnostic testing are awaited.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Lipopolisacáridos/orina , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Urinálisis/métodos , Adulto , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/aislamiento & purificación , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/metabolismo , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tuberculosis/microbiología
8.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 40(5): 418-425, 2021 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33464020

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Serotype-specific diagnosis of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia in children under age 5 years would mark a major advancement for understanding pneumococcal epidemiology and supporting vaccine decision-making. METHODS: A Luminex technology-based multiplex urinary antigen detection (UAD) diagnostic assay was developed and subsequently validated in adults, but its applicability to children is unknown. This study aimed to set appropriate cutoffs for use of the UAD in a healthy pediatric population and apply these cutoffs in children with pneumonia in sub-Saharan Africa. The cutoffs were determined by assessing 379 urines obtained from healthy children under age 5 years from the Bobo-Dioulasso area for serotypes included in 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (UAD-1) and the 11 other serotypes unique to 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (UAD-2). RESULTS: Based on the assigned cutoff values, among 108 children who met the World Health Organization consolidation endpoint criteria, UAD-1 and UAD-2 were positive in 23.3% and 8.3%, respectively; among 364 children with clinically suspected pneumonia who did not meet the World Health Organization criteria, UAD-1 and UAD-2 were positive for 6.6% and 3.6%, respectively. Pneumococcal carriage prevalence was similar among pneumonia cases (30%) versus controls (35%) as was semiquantitative carriage density. CONCLUSIONS: UAD-1 and UAD-2 were able to distinguish community controls from children with pneumonia, particularly pneumonia with consolidation. Future studies are needed to confirm these results and more fully assess the contribution of pneumococcal carriage and concurrent viral infection.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Portador Sano/diagnóstico , Determinación de Punto Final , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Serotipificación , Burkina Faso/epidemiología , Portador Sano/sangre , Portador Sano/orina , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Lactante , Masculino , Vacunas Neumococicas , Neumonía Neumocócica/sangre , Neumonía Neumocócica/orina , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Serogrupo , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología
9.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 40(4): 871-877, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33150516

RESUMEN

The urinary antigen test (UAT) is a rapid diagnostic method for pneumococcal pneumonia, but the high false-negative rate of 30% may affect its reliability. To maximize the utility of UAT, it is necessary to investigate the patient factors affecting UAT results. However, there is no report elucidating the association between its utility and pre-existing lung abnormalities. We retrospectively reviewed 388 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia confirmed by blood and/or sputum culture tests. Finally, 94 of 388 patients who had the results of UAT and computed tomography scans were enrolled to evaluate the association between the utility of UAT and patient factors including pulmonary emphysema and fibrosis. The overall positive rate of UAT was 69.1%. The positive rates of UAT in the patients with emphysema were significantly lower than those in individuals without emphysema (33.3% and 77.6%, p < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of emphysema was associated with a low positive rate (odds ratio 6.944, 95% confidence interval 2.268-21.231). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the presence of emphysema and lower levels of serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were significantly and independently associated with a low positive rate. The combination of emphysema and BUN can potentially stratify the positive rate of UAT in patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. Patients with pneumococcal pneumonia and emphysema have a lower positive rate of UAT. Additionally, the combination of emphysema and serum BUN value may be useful to evaluate the reliability of the negative results of pneumococcal UAT.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Enfisema/complicaciones , Neumonía Neumocócica/complicaciones , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antígenos Bacterianos/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Neumocócica/orina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/metabolismo
10.
Respir Investig ; 59(2): 204-211, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33339738

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Legionella spp. can cause severe pneumonia and most Legionella pneumonia (LP) cases are diagnosed using the urine antigen test (UAT). However, diagnosis of LP with negative UAT results (LPNUAT) is challenging. We investigated the clinical and radiological features of LPNUAT. METHODS: We retrospectively collected LP cases with positive UAT (LPPUAT) and cases of suspected LP with negative UAT that were examined by Legionella culture between July 2014 and March 2020. We investigated the clinical and CT findings for LP that showed negative UAT results and was diagnosed by culture and compared these findings with those for other pneumonias suspicious for LP with negative results in UAT and Legionella culture (OPSLP). RESULTS: Eight LPNUAT, 20 LPPUAT, and 19 OPSLP cases were included in this study. There were no significant differences in the clinical and CT findings between LPPUAT and LPNUAT when examined by UAT. In LPNUAT, dyspnea, renal dysfunction, liver dysfunction, and bilateral lesions were more commonly observed and inflammatory changes and the number of affected lobes were significantly higher when examined by culture than when examined by UAT. Comparison to OPSLP, LPNUAT did not show such differences, but rather showed disturbances in consciousness, hyponatremia and rhabdomyolysis. Furthermore, lobar consolidation was observed more frequently and bronchial wall thickening and centrilobular nodules were observed less frequently in LPNUAT. CONCLUSIONS: LP characteristics such as disturbance of consciousness, hyponatremia, rhabdomyolysis, lobar consolidation, and less bronchial wall thickening and centrilobular nodule contribute to the diagnosis of LP in patients with negative UAT results.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Pruebas Inmunológicas/métodos , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultados Negativos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto , Anciano , Biomarcadores/orina , Femenino , Humanos , Legionella pneumophila/inmunología , Legionella pneumophila/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/microbiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Int J Infect Dis ; 103: 42-47, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33176204

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of a novel test kit that could theoretically detect all serogroups of Legionella pneumophila for diagnosing Legionella pneumonia, in comparison with existing kits. METHODS: This study was conducted in 16 hospitals in Japan from April 2016 to December 2018. Three urinary antigen test kits were used: the novel kit (LAC-116), BinaxNOW Legionella (Binax), and Q-line Kyokutou Legionella (Q-line). In addition, sputum culture and nucleic acid detection tests and serum antibody tests were performed where possible. The diagnostic accuracy and correlations of the novel kit with the two existing kits were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 56 patients were diagnosed with Legionella pneumonia. The sensitivities of LAC-116, Binax, and Q-line were 79%, 84%, and 71%, respectively. The overall match rate between LAC-116 and Binax was 96.8% and between LAC-116 and Q-line was 96.4%. One patient had L. pneumophila serogroup 2, and only LAC-116 showed a positive result, whereas Binax and Q-line did not. CONCLUSIONS: The novel Legionella urinary antigen test kit was useful for diagnosing Legionella pneumonia. In addition, it could detect Legionella pneumonia caused by non-L. pneumophila serogroup 1.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/análisis , Legionella pneumophila/clasificación , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/diagnóstico , Anciano , Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Legionella pneumophila/inmunología , Legionella pneumophila/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Serogrupo
12.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 56(11)2020 Oct 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33138045

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen (u-Ag) testing has recently gained attention in the early diagnosis of severe and critical acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2/pneumococcal co-infection. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of Streptococcus pneumoniae u-Ag testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, in order to assess whether pneumococcal co-infection is associated with different mortality rate and hospital stay in these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Charts, protocols, mortality, and hospitalization data of a consecutive series of COVID-19 patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in northern Italy during COVID-19 outbreak were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent Streptococcus pneumoniae u-Ag testing to detect an underlying pneumococcal co-infection. Covid19+/u-Ag+ and Covid19+/u-Ag- patients were compared in terms of overall survival and length of hospital stay using chi-square test and survival analysis. RESULTS: Out of 575 patients with documented pneumonia, 13% screened positive for the u-Ag test. All u-Ag+ patients underwent treatment with Ceftriaxone and Azithromycin or Levofloxacin. Lopinavir/Ritonavir or Darunavir/Cobicistat were added in 44 patients, and hydroxychloroquine and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in 47 and 33 patients, respectively. All u-Ag+ patients were hospitalized. Mortality was 15.4% and 25.9% in u-Ag+ and u-Ag- patients, respectively (p = 0.09). Survival analysis showed a better prognosis, albeit not significant, in u-Ag+ patients. Median hospital stay did not differ among groups (10 vs. 9 days, p = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of Streptococcus pneumoniae u-Ag testing helped to better target antibiotic therapy with a final trend of reduction in mortality of u-Ag+ COVID-19 patients having a concomitant pneumococcal infection. Randomized trials on larger cohorts are necessary in order to draw definitive conclusion.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Coinfección/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Neumonía Neumocócica/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Ceftriaxona/uso terapéutico , Cobicistat/uso terapéutico , Coinfección/orina , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Estudios Transversales , Darunavir/uso terapéutico , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Heparina de Bajo-Peso-Molecular/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Lopinavir/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Neumocócica/complicaciones , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Neumonía Neumocócica/orina , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ritonavir/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
13.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0238479, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32866217

RESUMEN

The performances of the ImmuView Streptococcus pneumoniae (Sp) and Legionella pneumophila (Lp) urinary antigen test were compared to that of the BinaxNOW Sp and Lp assays, using frozen urine from 166 patients with Legionnaires' disease (LD) and 59 patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. Thirty Sp-positive or contrived cerebrospinal fluids (CSF) were also tested. Test specimens were collected and tested at different sites, with each site testing unique specimens by technologists blinded to expected results. No significant differences in test concordances were detected for the ImmuView and BinaxNOW assays for the Sp or Lp targets for urine from patients with pneumococcal pneumonia or LD when performance from both sites were combined. At one of two test sites the ImmuView Lp assay was more sensitive than the BinaxNOW assay, with no correlation between test performance and Lp serogroup 1 monoclonal type. Urines from six of seven patients with LD caused by Legionella spp. bacteria other than Lp serogroup 1 were negative in both assays. Both tests had equivalent performance for Sp-positive CSF. The clinical sensitivities for pneumococcal pneumonia were 88.1 and 94.4% for the ImmuView and Binax assays, and 87.6 and 84.2% for the Lp assays, respectively. Test specificities for pneumococcal pneumonia were 96.2 and 97.0% for the ImmuView and Binax assays, and 99.6 and 99.1% for the Lp assays. Both assays were highly specific for Sp in pediatric urines from children with nasopharyngeal colonization by the bacterium. ImmuView and BinaxNOW assay performance was equivalent in these studies.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/metabolismo , Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Bioensayo/métodos , Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/microbiología , Legionella pneumophila/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Orina/microbiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas Inmunológicas/métodos , Lactante , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/metabolismo , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/microbiología , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/orina , Masculino , Meningitis/metabolismo , Meningitis/microbiología , Meningitis/orina , Neumonía Neumocócica/metabolismo , Neumonía Neumocócica/microbiología , Neumonía Neumocócica/orina , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Serogrupo , Adulto Joven
14.
Euro Surveill ; 25(30)2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32734857

RESUMEN

We report a case of Legionella pneumonia in a dishwasher of a restaurant in Rome, Italy, just after the end of the lockdown that was in place to control the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. The case highlights the importance of strict monitoring of water and air systems immediately before reopening business or public sector buildings, and the need to consider Legionella infections among the differential diagnosis of respiratory infections after lockdown due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Legionella pneumophila/aislamiento & purificación , Legionella/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/diagnóstico , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Antiinfecciosos Urinarios/uso terapéutico , Tos/etiología , Fiebre/etiología , Cefalea/etiología , Humanos , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/orina , Masculino , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/orina , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 39(9): 1641-1644, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32303927

RESUMEN

Detection of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 urinary antigens is the most widely used technique for the diagnosis of Legionnaires' disease (LD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Legionella K-set® immunochromatographic test, in comparison with the BinaxNOW® Legionella urinary antigen card (UAC) on concentrated urine samples (US). A total of 250 concentrated US including 200 prospective US sent to the laboratory for urinary antigens' testing and 50 frozen US from patients with confirmed LD were tested. Positive US were retested after boiling (5 min, 100 °C). Each US leading to discordant results between the two tests was further tested using Binax™ Legionella EIA. Then, 10 additional positive non-concentrated US were tested using both tests. On concentrated US, Legionella K-set® test showed concordant results with that of BinaxNOW® Legionella. All negative US with BinaxNOW® were negative with Legionella K-set® test. For the 50 frozen US, all were positive with BinaxNOW® and 49 were positive with Legionella K-set®, all confirmed after boiling except 3 US which led to uninterpretable results with Legionella K-set®, due to a migration defect. Three of the 10 additional positive non-concentrated US were found negative with Legionella K-set® and only 1 US remained negative after concentration. All these positive non-concentrated US were positive with BinaxNOW® Legionella. The performance of the Legionella K-set® test is comparable to that of BinaxNOW® Legionella UAC, if performed on concentrated US.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Legionella pneumophila/inmunología , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/diagnóstico , Humanos , Pruebas Inmunológicas , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/microbiología , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/orina , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Urinálisis
18.
J Infect Dis ; 221(Suppl 2): S198-S205, 2020 03 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32176798

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In China, no national survey has been conducted to evaluate physicians' attitudes and compliance with guidelines in the management of adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate physicians' awareness of the use of microbiological tests in the management of severe CAP (SCAP) and to investigate the availability of nonculture tests in China. METHODS: A nationwide electronic questionnaire survey was conducted among Chinese physicians between March and July 2018, which assessed their viewpoints concerning the issues in the management of SCAP. RESULTS: A total of 6333 physicians completed this survey, evenly covering all career stages. Among these, 3208 (50.6%) and 1936 (30.6%) had blind spots in the application of blood and sputum cultures in the management of SCAP, respectively. Nonteaching hospital, nonrespirologists, and junior career stage were independently associated with misunderstandings. Regarding nonculture methods, 52.7% of the facilities had no access to polymerase chain reaction-based pathogen detection tests. The accessibility of urinary antigen tests for Streptococcus pneumoniae (42.5%) and Legionella pneumophila (38.5%) was also low. The main barriers were inland and remote region, lower hospital level, and nonteaching hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient use of sputum and blood cultures, together with low accessibility of major nonculture techniques, were noticeable barriers to achieving microbiological diagnosis of SCAP in China. To help curb the overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics, further measures should be taken to raise awareness among nonspecialists and promote rapid nonculture tests, especially in nonteaching hospitals and developing regions.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Técnicas Microbiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Cultivo de Sangre , China , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Hospitales , Humanos , Legionella pneumophila/inmunología , Modelos Logísticos , Análisis Multivariante , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Neumonía/microbiología , Esputo/microbiología , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 39(4): 729-734, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31838606

RESUMEN

Currently, diagnosis of legionellosis relies mainly on urinary antigen testing (UAT) for Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 (Lp1). However, this test has several limitations, particularly missing non-Lp1 infections. The purpose of this large multicenter study was to investigate the risk of missing legionellosis relying on UAT solely. Molecular results of Legionella detection as part of a first-line (syndromic) testing algorithm for severe respiratory tract infections were investigated retrospectively and compared with UAT results in 14 Belgian laboratories. Overall, 44.4% (20/45) UAT results appeared false negative and were reclassified as legionellosis based on PCR findings [Legionnaires' disease, 37.5% (15/40); Pontiac fever, 100% (5/5)]. A total of 39.4% (26/66) diagnosis probably would have been missed or delayed without a syndromic approach, as UAT or specific molecular testing for Legionella was not requested by the clinician. Furthermore, we confirmed the higher sensitivity of molecular Legionella detection in lower respiratory tract compared with upper respiratory tract specimens (p = 0.010).


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Legionella pneumophila/clasificación , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/diagnóstico , Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Urinálisis , Bélgica , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Humanos , Legionella pneumophila/química , Enfermedad de los Legionarios/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Serogrupo
20.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 39(4): 749-751, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31858355

RESUMEN

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the major causes of morbidity, mortality and hospitalization, and S. pneumoniae is the most frequently isolated etiologic agent. The pneumococcal urinary antigen test (PUAT) is among the recommended methods to identify the causative agent in CAP patients. A novel PUAT (IMMUNOCATCHTMStreptococcus pneumoniae) was compared with the Uni-GoldTMS. pneumoniae assay routinely used in our laboratory and with the widely used BinaxNOW® S. pneumoniae antigen card. A total of 218 (183 freshly harvested and 35 frozen) urine samples (US) submitted for the detection of pneumococcal urinary antigen (PUAT) between December 2016 and November 2018 were evaluated. A number of 160 negative and 41 positive concordant results were scored for all the three assays. A total of 17 US gave discrepant results. The sensitivity and specificity of Immunocatch compared with Uni-Gold were 73.2% and 98.8%, respectively, and compared with BinaxNOW were 97.6% and 98.8%, respectively. The overall percent agreement (OPA) and the Cohen's kappa coefficient between the Immunocatch and the Uni-Gold resulted 92.2% and 0.78%, respectively, and compared with BinaxNOW were 98.6% and 0.95%, respectively. These performances suggest that the novel Immunocatch S. pneumoniae test is a useful tool for qualitative detection of S. pneumoniae capsular antigen in US.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos Bacterianos/orina , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Neumonía Neumocócica/orina , Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico/normas , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/orina , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Streptococcus pneumoniae
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...