Additive Effects of Esaxerenone, a Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Blocker, on Cardioplegic Arrest in Rat Hearts.

PURPOSE: Esaxerenone, a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, attenuates global ischemia-induced myocardial damage and coronary endothelial dysfunction. This study aimed to determine whether esaxerenone exerted cardioprotective effects against cardioplegic arrest in Wistar rat hearts. METHODS: Isolated male Wistar rat hearts aerobically perfused via the Langendorff method for 20 min were randomly allocated to the Control (n = 6; perfused for an additional 10 min and subjected to no treatment) or Esax (n = 6; perfused with 0.1 µmol/L esaxerenone in perfusate for 10 min before ischemia) groups. Hearts in both groups were perfused with St. Thomas' Hospital No. 2 solution (STH2) for 2 min and subjected to 28 min of global ischemia. The recovery of left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and total troponin T leakage were measured after reperfusion. RESULTS: The final recovery of LVDP (expressed as a percentage of pre-ischemic value) in the Control and Esax groups was 50.8 ± 3.5% and 62.1 ± 5.6%, respectively (p <0.05, Esax vs. Control). The total troponin T leakage in the Control and Esax groups was 138.8 ± 18.5 ng/g heart wt and 74.3 ± 18.6 ng/g heart wt, respectively (p <0.05, Esax vs. Control). CONCLUSION: The administration of esaxerenone before cardioplegic arrest enhanced the cardioprotective effect exerted by STH2.

Management of Chronic Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a commonly seen clinical entity in the family physician's practice. This clinical review focuses on the pharmacologic management of chronic HFrEF. Special attention is paid to the classification of heart failure and the newest recommendations from the American Heart Association concerning the use of guideline-directed medical therapy. ß blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are discussed in detail. The new emphasis on sacubitril-valsartan and SGLT2i's as therapies for HFrEF are reviewed, followed by a brief discussion of more advanced therapies and comorbidity management.

Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Versus Oral Spironolactone in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: A Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) and spironolactone therapy for treating chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). Methods: This was a quasi-randomized controlled trial. Eligible patients were quasi-randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive SML or oral spironolactone and were assessed at 3 months after treatment. Results: A total of 84 patients (90 eyes) were randomly assigned to receive SML (n = 45) or spironolactone (n = 39) initially. At last follow-up, 59.5% of patients in the SML group had complete resolution of subretinal fluid (SRF) compared to 43.6% in spironolactone group (P = 0.362). The mean visual acuity did not significantly improve between the two groups (0.38 ± 0.44 vs. 0.43 ± 0.43 logMAR). The central retinal thickness was decreased from 335.06 ± 120.25 µm to 222.15 ± 94.90 µm in the SML group and from 308.02 ± 90.69 µm to 257.27 ± 102.28 µm in the spironolactone group. After treatment, subfoveal choroidal thickness, total choroidal area, and stromal and luminal choroidal area were significantly lower in the spironolactone group as compared to the SML group. During the entire visit, the recurrence rate of SRF was 9.1% in the SML group compared to 35.3% in the spironolactone group. Slight adverse events occurred more frequently in the spironolactone group (0% vs. 16%). Conclusions: Both SML and oral spironolactone were effective and safe treatments to ameliorate retinal anatomical structures for chronic CSC. A lower recurrence rate and fewer adverse effects were observed in the SML group, and better choroidal structure recovery was seen in the spironolactone group. Translational Relevance: The investigation of SML and oral spironolactone may inform evidence-based clinical decisions for chronic CSC patients.

Balancing acute medical management of acute kidney injury and hyperkalaemia versus medicines optimisation for long-term Cardio-Renal-Metabolic (CaReMe) diseases: a narrative review.

Cardio-Renal-Metabolic (CaReMe) diseases, in the form of heart failure, chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus, justify prescription of multiple prognostically beneficial medications, specifically renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. Use of these medications is complicated by association with adverse effects, particularly acute kidney injury and hyperkalaemia. Balancing risk and benefit is a common dilemma in acute medicine, with increasingly frequent and complex treatment decisions. Physicians should contemplate adjustments to medications within the context of not just acute illness but also long-term benefit. In the setting of hyperkalaemia, potassium-binding medications can be utilised. At hospital discharge optimisation of therapy can be achieved through clear safety netting advice, scheduled biochemical follow-up, and planned clinical review.

Spironolactone Reduces the Risk of Death in Veterans With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a complex syndrome increasing in prevalence and affecting millions worldwide but with limited evidence-based therapies. Results from explanatory clinical trials suggest that spironolactone may help to improve outcomes in patients with HFpEF. We sought to investigate the effectiveness of spironolactone in reducing death and hospitalization outcomes for patients with HFpEF in a real-world setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used electronic health records from the US Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system between 2002 and 2012 to identify patients with HFpEF who were followed longitudinally through 2014 using a validated algorithm. Among our HFpEF cohort that is 96% men, 85% White individuals, and aged 74±11 years, 3690 spironolactone users and 49 191 nonusers were identified and followed for a median of 2.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.5-2.4) and 3.3 (IQR, 1.6-5.9) years, respectively. We evaluated the effect of spironolactone use on all-cause death and number of days hospitalized per year for heart failure or for any cause by fitting generalized estimating equation-based Poisson and negative binomial models. Crude rates of 10.3 versus 13.5 deaths and 394.0 versus 485.9 days hospitalized were observed per 100 person-years for spironolactone users versus nonusers, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, there was a 21% reduction (95% CI, 13-29; P<0.0001) in rate of all-cause death among spironolactone users compared with nonusers and no statistically significant difference in days hospitalized for all causes or heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world national cohort of patients with HFpEF, spironolactone use reduced all-cause death and demonstrated a favorable trend in reducing the burden of hospitalizations.

Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on new-onset or recurrent atrial fibrillation: a Bayesian and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Background Clinical and translational research suggests that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) may prevent atrial fibrosis and electrical remodeling associated with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to consolidate existing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of MRAs on incident or recurrent AF. Methods Medline, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched until February 12, 2024. Triple-independent study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were performed. Evidence was pooled using both pairwise and Bayesian and frequentist network meta-analyses. Results Twenty-three RCTs (13,358 participants) were identified. Based on the pairwise random effects meta-analysis, MRAs were associated with a significant reduction in AF events compared to placebo or usual care (risk ratio {RR}= 0.75; 95% confidence interval {CI}= [0.66, 0.87]; P< 0.001; I2= 3%). This protective effect was robust both for new-onset and recurrent AF episodes (subgroup p-value= 0.69), while the baseline HF status was not a significant effect modifier (subgroup p-value= 0.58). MRAs demonstrated a significantly higher reduction in AF events for patients with chronic renal disease compared to placebo (RR= 0.78; 95% CI= [0.62, 0.98]; P= 0.03; I2= 0%). The network meta-analyses revealed that only spironolactone was associated with a significant reduction in AF events (Bayesian RR= 0.76; 95% CI= [0.65, 0.89]; P< 0.001; level of evidence moderate; SUCRA 0.731), while eplerenone and finerenone showed a neutral effect. Conclusion MRAs confer a significant benefit in terms of reducing incident or recurrent AF episodes, irrespective of HF status. In this context, spironolactone may be preferable compared to eplerenone or finerenone.

Who Can Receive Clinical Benefit from Mid-Term Vericiguat Add-on Therapy Among Patients with Systolic Heart Failure Receiving Quadruple Medical Therapy?

Vericiguat, a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator known for augmenting cyclic guanosine monophosphate production, has garnered substantial clinical attention in patients with systolic heart failure. Despite its proven efficacy, discerning the specific subset of individuals who can enjoy clinical advantages from vericiguat therapy in contemporary real-world clinical practice, particularly among the individuals undergoing "quadruple medical therapy" comprising administration of a beta-blocker, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, remains an unresolved query. This study involved patients undergoing 3-month vericiguat therapy alongside complete quadruple medical therapy in a contemporary real-world clinical practice. Baseline characteristics associated with the primary outcome, defined as a reduction in serum NT pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels over the 3-month therapeutic duration, were scrutinized. A cohort of 24 patients (median age: 66 years; 20 males) were included. All participants diligently adhered to the 3-month vericiguat therapy in conjunction with the quadruple medical regimen. A higher baseline systolic blood pressure emerged as an independent factor linked to the primary outcome, yielding an adjusted odds ratio of 1.31 (95% confidence interval: 1.03-1.65, P = 0.026) at a threshold of 105 mmHg. This threshold notably stratified the trajectories of serum NT pro-BNP levels during the 3-month vericiguat therapy. In conclusion, preservation of baseline systolic blood pressure emerged as a pivotal determinant for reaping the clinical benefits from mid-term vericiguat therapy among patients with systolic heart failure receiving quadruple medical therapy.

Clinical Management of Primary Aldosteronism: An Update.

Despite carrying an excess risk of cardiovascular events, primary aldosteronism (PA) is a commonly overlooked secondary form of arterial hypertension. An increased awareness of its high prevalence and broader screening strategies are urgently needed to improve its detection rate and allow early diagnosis and targeted treatment. For patients with unilateral PA, these measures can correct hyperaldosteronism and ensure cure of hypertension, even when resistant to drug treatment, thus preventing adverse cardiovascular events. Among these, atrial fibrillation is the most common, but left ventricular hypertrophy, stroke, chronic kidney disease, and myocardial infarction also occur more often than in patients with hypertension and no PA. Young patients, who have higher chances of being cured long term, and high-risk patients, such as those with stage III or resistant hypertension, are those who will benefit most from an early diagnosis of PA. Therefore, the implementation of strategies to detect PA by a simplified diagnostic algorithm is necessary. In the patients who seek for surgical cure, adrenal vein sampling is key for the identification of unilateral PA and the achievement of optimal outcomes. Unfortunately, being technically demanding and poorly available, adrenal vein sampling represents the bottleneck in the workup of PA. Considering the novel knowledge generated in the past 5 years in many studies, particularly in the AVIS-2 study (Adrenal Vein Sampling International Study-2), based on 4 decades of experience at our center and on the last guidelines, we herein provide an update on the management of PA with recommendations for drug treatment and strategies to avoid adrenal vein sampling wherever it is poorly, or not, available.

[Renoprotective treatments : renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade and beyond]. / Néphroprotection médicamenteuse : au-delà du blocage du système rénine-angiotensine.

RENOPROTECTIVE TREATMENTS: RENIN-ANGIOTENSINALDOSTERONE SYSTEM BLOCKADE AND BEYOND. Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) require both etiological and symptomatic treatments to slow renal function decline. Reductions of protein and salt intakes are required. Pharmacological treatments combines blockade of the renin-angiotensin system, sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in most diabetic patients. The albumin creatinine ration (ACR) in morning spot urine samples is now a therapeutic target both in diabetic and non-diabetic CKD patients.

NÉPHROPROTECTION MÉDICAMENTEUSE : AU-DELÀ DU BLOCAGE DU SYSTÈME RÉNINE-ANGIOTENSINE. Au-delà du traitement étiologique éventuel d'une maladie rénale chronique (MRC), et du contrôle de l'ensemble des facteurs de risque vasculaire, un traitement symptomatique est nécessaire pour ralentir le déclin de la fonction rénale. La prise en charge diététique permet de limiter les apports en protéines et en sel. Le traitement pharmacologique comporte nécessairement une association d'un bloqueur du système rénine-angiotensine-aldostérone, le plus souvent un inhibiteur du co-transport sodiumglucose de type 2 (SGLT2i) et chez certains diabétiques un antagoniste des récepteurs des minéralocorticoïdes (ARM). Le rapport albuminurie/créatininurie (RAC) sur un échantillon d'urine devient une cible thérapeutique aussi bien chez les non-diabétiques que chez les diabétiques.

High-intensity care for GDMT titration.

Heart failure (HF) is a systemic disease associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, increased risk of hospitalizations, and low quality of life. Therefore, effective, systemic treatment strategies are necessary to mitigate these risks. In this manuscript, we emphasize the concept of high-intensity care to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in HF patients. The document highlights the importance of achieving optimal recommended doses of GDMT medications, including beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors to improve patient outcomes, achieve effective, sustainable decongestion, and improve patient quality of life. The document also discusses potential obstacles to GDMT optimization, such as clinical inertia, physiological limitations, comorbidities, non-adherence, and frailty. Lastly, it also attempts to provide possible future scenarios of high-intensive care that could improve patient outcomes.

Comparative efficacy and safety of SGLT2is and ns-MRAs in patients with diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of non-steroid mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (ns-MRAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Methods: Systematic literature searches were performed using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science encompassing inception until January 20, 2024. Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing ns-MRAs and SGLT2is in DKD were selected. The efficacy outcomes of interest included kidney-specific composite outcome, cardiovascular (CV)-specific composite outcome, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and overall mortality. We also investigated safety outcomes, including acute kidney injury (AKI) and hyperkalemia. Results: A total of 10 randomized clinical trials with 35,786 patients applying various treatments were included. SGLT2is (SUCRA 99.84%) have potential superiority in kidney protection. SGLT2is (RR 1.41, 95%CI 1.26 to 1.57) and ns-MRAs (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.27) were associated with significantly lower kidney-specific composite outcome than the placebo. Regarding the reduction in CV-specific composite outcome and ESKD, SGLT2is (SUCRA 91.61%; 91.38%) have potential superiority in playing cardiorenal protection. Concerning the CV-specific composite outcome (RR 1.27, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.43) and ESKD (RR 1.43, 95%CI 1.20 to 1.72), SGLT2is significantly reduced the risks compared to placebo. Regarding the reduction in overall mortality, SGLT2is (SUCRA 83.03%) have potential superiority in postponing mortality. Concerning the overall mortality, SGLT2is have comparable effects (RR 1.27, 95%CI 1.09 to 1.43) with placebo to reduce the risk of overall mortality compared to placebo. For AKI reduction, ns-MRAs (SUCRA 63.58%) have potential superiority. SGLT2is have comparable effects (RR 1.24, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.46) with placebo to reduce the risk of AKI. For hyperkalemia reduction, SGLT2is (SUCRA 93.12%) have potential superiority. SGLT2is have comparable effects (RR 1.24, 95%CI 1.05 to 1.46) with placebo to reduce the risk of AKI. Concerning hyperkalemia reduction, nsMRAs (RR 1.24 95%CI 0.39 to 3.72) and SGLT2is (RR 1.01 95%CI 0.40 to 3.02) did not show significant benefit compared to placebo. Conclusion: Concerning the efficacy and safety outcomes, SGLT2is may be recommended as a treatment regimen for maximizing kidney and cardiovascular protection, with a minimal risk of hyperkalemia in DKD. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023458613.

Non-cardiac comorbidities in heart failure: an update on diagnostic and management strategies.

Managing non-cardiac comorbidities in heart failure (HF) requires a tailored approach that addresses each patient's specific conditions and needs. Regular communication and coordination among healthcare providers is crucial to providing the best possible care for these patients. Poorly controlled hypertension contributes to left ventricular remodeling and diastolic dysfunction, emphasizing the importance of optimal blood pressure control while avoiding adverse effects. Among HF patients with diabetes, SGLT2 inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have shown promise in reducing HF-related morbidity and mortality. Chronic kidney disease exacerbates HF and vice versa, forming the vicious cardiorenal syndrome, so disease-modifying therapies should be maintained in HF patients with comorbid CKD, even with transient changes in kidney function. Anemia in HF patients may be multifactorial, and there is growing evidence for the benefit of intravenous iron supplementation in HF patients with iron deficiency with or without anemia. Obesity, although a risk factor for HF, paradoxically offers a better prognosis once HF is established, though developing treatment strategies may improve symptoms and cardiac performance. In HF patients with stroke and atrial fibrillation, anticoagulation therapy is recommended. Among HF patients with sleep-disordered breathing, continuous positive airway pressure may improve sleep quality. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease often coexists with HF, and many patients can tolerate cardioselective beta-blockers. Cancer patients with comorbid HF require careful consideration of cardiotoxicity risks associated with cancer therapies. Depression is underdiagnosed in HF patients and significantly impacts prognosis. Cognitive impairment is prevalent in HF patients and impacts their self-care and overall quality of life.

Reassessing heart failure therapy in Thailand: Patient insights and treatment outcomes from the Thai heart failure registry.

BACKGROUND: This research analyzed the demographics, management, and outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF) in Thailand. METHODS: The Thai Heart Failure Registry prospectively enrolled patients diagnosed with HF from 36 hospitals in Thailand. Follow-up data were recorded at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. This study primarily focused on two outcomes: mortality and HF-related hospitalizations. RESULTS: The study included 2639 patients aged at least 18. Their mean age was 59.2 ± 14.5 years, and most were male (68.4%). Patients were classified as having HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, 80.7%), HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, 9.0%), or HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF, 10.3%). Guideline-directed medical therapy utilization varied. Beta-blockers had the highest usage (93.2%), followed by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (65.7%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (39.3%), angiotensin receptor blockers (28.2%), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (16.1%), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (8.0%). The study monitored a composite of mortality and HF incidents, revealing incidence rates of 11.74, 12.50, and 8.93 per 100 person-years for the overall, HFrEF, and HFmrEF/HFpEF populations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high guideline-directed medical therapy adherence, the Thai Heart Failure Registry data revealed high mortality and recurrent HF rates. These findings underscore limitations in current HF treatment efficacy. The results indicate the need for further investigation and improvements of HF management to enhance patient outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness of Finerenone in Addition to Standard of Care for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes in China.

INTRODUCTION: Adding finerenone to current standard of care (SoC), as recommended by Chinese guidelines, has shown substantial benefit in delaying chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with CKD and type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the landmark FIDELIO-DKD trial. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of finerenone + SoC versus SoC alone among Chinese patients with T2D and CKD from a healthcare system perspective. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness model (FINE-CKD) has been developed and published, with health states defined for CKD stages (CKD 1/2, CKD 3, CKD 4, and CKD 5 without renal replacement therapy (RRT), dialysis, or transplant) and cardiovascular event history. Additionally, the model also considered adverse events. Transition probabilities and event risks were derived using patient-level data from Asian population analysis of FIDELIO-DKD. Since the price of finerenone after the national reimbursement drug list (NRDL) inclusion was confidential, the cost of finerenone in the model was assumed to be the same as that of SoC. Other health resource costs were gathered from literature and supplemented by physician interviews. Measured by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, quality of life was translated into utilities based on the Chinese EQ-5D-5L value set. RESULTS: Discounted at 5.0% annually, over a lifetime horizon, finerenone + SoC resulted in a quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gain of 0.321 versus SoC alone (8.660 vs. 8.338 QALYs), due to a reduction in the incidence of cardiovascular events and dialysis. Total costs per patient were lower under finerenone + SoC than SoC alone (381,130 CNY vs. 392,390 CNY). As a result, finerenone + SoC was a dominant treatment strategy compared with SoC alone. Sensitivity analysis has confirmed the robustness of this study. CONCLUSION: Adding finerenone to SoC was likely to be either a dominant or cost-effective treatment option compared with SoC alone in Chinese patients with CKD and T2D.

Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Finerenone Improves Diastolic Dysfunction in Preclinical Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: The mineralocorticoid receptor plays a significant role in the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and associated cardiovascular complications. Classic steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are a therapeutic option, but their use in the clinic is limited due to the associated risk of hyperkalemia in patients with CKD. Finerenone is a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist that has been recently investigated in 2 large phase III clinical trials (FIDELIO-DKD [Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease] and FIGARO-DKD [Finerenone in Reducing Cardiovascular Mortality and Morbidity in Diabetic Kidney Disease]), showing reductions in kidney and cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We tested whether finerenone improves renal and cardiac function in a preclinical nondiabetic CKD model. Twelve weeks after 5/6 nephrectomy, the rats showed classic signs of CKD characterized by a reduced glomerular filtration rate and increased kidney weight, associated with left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction and decreased LV perfusion. These changes were associated with increased cardiac fibrosis and reduced endothelial nitric oxide synthase activating phosphorylation (ser 1177). Treatment with finerenone prevented LV diastolic dysfunction and increased LV tissue perfusion associated with a reduction in cardiac fibrosis and increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase phosphorylation. Curative treatment with finerenone improves nondiabetic CKD-related LV diastolic function associated with a reduction in cardiac fibrosis and increased cardiac phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase independently from changes in kidney function. Short-term finerenone treatment decreased LV end-diastolic pressure volume relationship and increased phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide synthase activity. CONCLUSIONS: We showed that the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone reduces renal hypertrophy and albuminuria, attenuates cardiac diastolic dysfunction and cardiac fibrosis, and improves cardiac perfusion in a preclinical nondiabetic CKD model.

Ongoing and Future Clinical Trials of Pharmacotherapy for Heart Failure.

Increasing knowledge of the processes leading to heart failure (HF) has allowed significant developments in therapies for HF over the past few decades. Despite the evolution of HF treatment, it still places a large burden on patients and health care systems across the world.We used clinicaltrials.gov to gather information about clinical trials as of August 2023 studying pharmacotherapy for HF. We included interventional trials that were "active, not recruiting", "recruiting", or looking for participants but "not yet recruiting". In total, 119 studies met our criteria of ongoing clinical trials studying novel as well as currently approved HF pharmacotherapies. The major interventions were novel medications/already approved medications for other diseases 29 % (34 trials), sodium-glucose co-transporter inhibitors 21 % (25 trials), angiotensin receptor blocker-neprilysin inhibitors 10 % (12 trials), diuretics 14 % (17 trials) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists 5 % (6 trials). Ongoing research will aid in reducing the impact of HF and we summarize clinical trials leading the way to better HF treatment in this review.

Utilizing synchronous care to improve cardiovascular and renal health among patients with type 2 diabetes: Proof-of-concept results from the DECIDE-CV clinical programme.

AIM: The management of patients with type 2 diabetes is asynchronous, i.e. not coordinated in time, resulting in delayed access to care and low use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients assessed in the 'synchronized' DECIDE-CV clinic. In this outpatient clinic, patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular or chronic kidney disease are simultaneously assessed by an endocrinologist, cardiologist and nephrologist in the same visit. The primary outcome was use of GDMT before and after the assessment in the clinic, including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, renin-angiotensin system blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Secondary outcomes included the baseline-to-last-visit change in surrogate laboratory biomarkers. RESULTS: The first 232 patients evaluated in the clinic were included. The mean age was 67 ± 12 years, 69% were men and 92% had diabetes. In total, 73% of patients had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, 65% heart failure, 56% chronic kidney disease and 59% had a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g. There was a significant increase in the use of GDMT:sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (from 44% to 87% of patients), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (from 8% to 45%), renin-angiotensin system blockers (from 77% to 91%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (from 25% to 45%) (p < .01 for all). Among patients with paired laboratory data, glycated haemoglobin, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio and N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide levels significantly dropped from baseline (p < .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Joint assessment of patients with diabetes in a synchronized cardiometabolic clinic holds promise for enhancing GDMT use and has led to significant reductions in surrogate cardiovascular and renal laboratory biomarkers.

Novel Initiative Increasing GDMT Use Among Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Guideline-directed medical therapy utilization in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains low despite benefits in morbidity and mortality. The authors describe a unique quality improvement initiative designed to increase angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) utilization in outpatients with HFrEF in a large cardiology practice, whereby eligible patients were identified in a standardized review process and medication utilization rates were linked to group quality metrics. Eligible HFrEF patients were defined as having a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40% and NYHA functional class II to IV level of symptoms. Those with an LVEF >40%, no documented LVEF, or with NYHA functional class I symptoms were excluded. ARNI utilization was defined as any dose of sacubitril/valsartan prescribed, and MRA utilization was defined as any dose of either spironolactone or eplerenone prescribed. Group quality metric targets were set at >25% ARNI prescription and >60% MRA prescription in eligible patients. Following project implementation, ARNI utilization rose from 31% to 67% and MRA increased from 28% to 66%. Establishing clear quality metrics and formulating a proactive evaluation process was associated with a significant increase in prescription rates.