Pitolisant for treating patients with narcolepsy.

Introduction: Narcolepsy is a rare sleep disorder characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, disturbed nocturnal sleep, hypnagogic hallucinations, and sleep paralysis. Pitolisant is a first-in-class drug acting on histamine 3 receptors and indicated for the treatment of narcolepsy. This article aims to review pitolisant.Areas covered: In this paper the chemical properties, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of pitolisant was introduced, and the development course of drugs for treating narcolepsy is also briefly described. We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed and the following keywords were used: 'pitolisant' and 'narcolepsy', 'cataplexy' and 'excessive daytime sleepiness' and 'histamine 3 receptor'.Expert opinion: Pitolisant is a histamine 3 receptor antagonist/inverse agonist. It can activate histamine release in the brain and enhances wakefulness. Clinical studies showed that pitolisant significantly decreased excessive daytime sleepiness and cataplexy rate versus placebo. Pitolisant was well tolerated, common adverse reactions were headache, insomnia, nausea, and anxiety.

Long-term use of pitolisant to treat patients with narcolepsy: Harmony III Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To asses the long-term safety and efficacy of pitolisant, an histamine H3-receptor antagonist, on narcolepsy. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm, pragmatic study, recruited adult patients with narcolepsy and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score ≥12. After a titration period, patients were treated for up to 1 year with oral pitolisant once-a-day at up to 40 mg. Concomitant stimulants and anti-cataplectic agents were allowed. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included ESS, cataplexy, and other diary parameters. RESULTS: Patients (n = 102, 75 with cataplexy) received pitolisant, for the first time in 73 of them. Sixty-eight patients (51 with cataplexy) completed the 12-month treatment. Common treatment-emergent adverse events were headache (11.8% of patients), insomnia (8.8%), weight gain (7.8%), anxiety (6.9%), depressive symptoms (4.9%), and nausea (4.9%). Seven patients had a serious adverse effect, unrelated to pitolisant except for a possibly related miscarriage. One-third of patients stopped pitolisant, mostly (19.6%) for insufficient benefit. ESS score decreased by 4.6 ± 0.6. Two-thirds of patients completing the treatment were responders (ESS ≤ 10 or ESS decrease ≥ 3), and one third had normalized ESS (≤10). Complete and partial cataplexy, hallucinations, sleep paralysis, and sleep attacks were reduced by 76%, 65%, 54%, 63%, and 27%, respectively. Pitolisant as monotherapy (43% of patients) was better tolerated and more efficacious on ESS than on add-on, but efficacy was maintained in this last case. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term safety and efficacy of pitolisant on daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, hallucinations, and sleep paralysis is confirmed.

Pitolisant for the treatment of narcolepsy with or without cataplexy. / Neuer Wirkstoff gegen Narkolepsie Eingriff in die histaminerge Neurotransmission durch Pitolisant.

Since March 2016, a new treatment option for adult patients with narcolepsy ­ with or without cataplexy ­ has been granted marketing authorization in Europe. Pitolisant (Wakix®) is an inverse agonst at the histamine-3 (H3) receptor. In clinical studies, tests for measurement of wakefulness and attention, pitolisant showed significantly better results in comparison with placebo and similar results in comparison with modafinil. Pitolisant is well tolerated. Postmarketing analyses have to collect data about the long-term safety of pitolisant when used in a real-life setting.

A randomized trial of the efficacy and safety of the H3 antagonist ABT-288 in cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia.

INTRODUCTION: ABT-288 is a highly potent histamine-3 receptor antagonist that has demonstrated pro-cognitive effects in preclinical models relevant to schizophrenia. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of two doses of ABT-288 in the treatment of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group 12-week study was conducted at 23 centers in the United States. Clinically stable subjects with schizophrenia were randomized in an equal ratio to ABT-288 10 mg, ABT-288 25 mg, or placebo once daily while continuing their antipsychotic regimen. The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to day 84 evaluation on the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) composite score vs placebo. Secondary measures included cognitive functioning and psychiatric scales. Safety assessments and sparse pharmacokinetic sampling were also conducted. RESULTS: A total of 214 subjects were randomized. The mean baseline MCCB composite score was 28.4. Approximately 80% of subjects completed the study. The MCCB composite score mean change from baseline to day 84 was numerically worse for both the 10 mg (1.90, P = .618) and 25 mg (0.64, P = .946) doses of ABT-288 vs placebo (2.19). Results from the secondary measures were consistent with the primary analysis. Subjects' schizophrenia symptoms remained stable throughout the study as evidenced by stable Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale scores. Overall, study medication was tolerated; however, an increased incidence of psychosis-related and sleep-related adverse events was associated with ABT-288. DISCUSSION: Neither dose of ABT-288 resulted in cognitive improvement in clinically stable adults with schizophrenia.

The H3 antagonist ABT-288 is tolerated at significantly higher exposures in subjects with schizophrenia than in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: ABT-288 is a potent and selective H3 receptor antagonist with procognitive effects in several preclinical models. In previous studies, 3 mg once daily was the maximal tolerated dose in healthy volunteers. This study characterized the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ABT-288 in stable subjects with schizophrenia. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating study of ABT-288 (10 dose levels, from 1 to 60 mg once daily for 14 days) in stable subjects with schizophrenia treated with an atypical antipsychotic. In each dose group, five to seven and two to three participants were assigned to ABT-288 and placebo, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 67 participants enrolled, nine participants (on ABT-288) were prematurely discontinued, in seven of these due to adverse events. ABT-288 was generally safe and tolerated at doses up to 45 mg once daily. The most common adverse events, in decreasing frequency (from 31 to 5%), were abnormal dreams, headache, insomnia, dizziness, somnolence, dysgeusia, dry mouth, psychotic disorder, parosmia and tachycardia. Adverse events causing early termination were psychotic events (four) and increased creatine phosphokinase, pyrexia and insomnia (one each). The half-life of ABT-288 ranged from 28 to 51 h, and steady state was achieved by day 12 of dosing. At comparable multiple doses, ABT-288 exposure in subjects with schizophrenia was 45% lower than that previously observed in healthy subjects. At trough, ABT-288 cerebrospinal fluid concentrations were 40% of the total plasma concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: ABT-288 was tolerated at a 15-fold higher dose and 12-fold higher exposures in subjects with schizophrenia than previously observed in healthy volunteers. The greater ABT-288 tolerability was not due to limited brain uptake.

The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and cognitive effects of GSK239512, a selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a preliminary investigation.

BACKGROUND: The histamine H3 receptor plays a critical role in the negative neuromodulation of neurotransmitters involved in cognitive function. H3 receptor antagonists/inverse agonists have been shown to exert pro-cognitive effects in pre-clinical models. GSK239512 is a potent and selective H3 receptor antagonist developed for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in neurodegenerative disorders. In this study we examined the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pro-cognitive effects of GSK239512 (oral) in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease using ascending dose titration regimens. METHODS: The study was conducted in two parts. Part A was a single-blind, placebo run-in, flexible dose titration over 9 days in two cohorts, each consisting of two patients. Part B was a double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel group, which investigated 3 flexible dose titration regimens over 4 weeks in 3 cohorts, each consisting of eight patients. RESULTS: Overall, the 5/10/20/40 µg and 10/20/40/80 µg regimens were well-tolerated. The regimen of 20/40/80/150 µg showed the poorest tolerability likely due to the higher starting dose. There were no clinically significant abnormalities in haematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis parameters and cardiovascular parameters. GSK239512 had positive effects on tasks of attention and memory with effect sizes between 0.56 and 1.37. CONCLUSIONS: GSK239512 displayed asatisfactory level of tolerability in patients with Alzheimer's disease with evidence for positive effects on attention and memory. The findings suggest that a titration regimen with a starting dose of 5-10 µg and a maximum dose of 80 µg is likely to be a well-tolerated and potentially efficacious regimen for future clinical trials in patients with Alzheimer's disease. These findings await replication in a larger study.

Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the histamine H3 receptor antagonist, ABT-288, in healthy young adults and elderly volunteers.

AIM: The objective of this work was to characterize the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of ABT-288, a highly selective histamine H3 receptor antagonist, in healthy young adults and elderly subjects following single and multiple dosing in a phase 1 setting. METHODS: Single doses (0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 20 and 40 mg ABT-288) and multiple doses (0.5, 1.5, 3 and 6 mg ABT-288 once-daily for 14 days) were evaluated in young adults and multiple doses (0.5, 1.5, 3 and 5 mg ABT-288 once-daily for 12 days) were evaluated in elderly subjects using randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating study designs. The effect of food on ABT-288 pharmacokinetics (5 mg single dose) was evaluated using an open label, randomized, crossover design. RESULTS: ABT-288 safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics were comparable in young and elderly subjects. Single doses up to 40 mg and multiple doses up to 3 mg once-daily were generally safe and well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events were hot flush, headache, abnormal dreams, insomnia, nausea and dizziness. ABT-288 exposure (AUC) was dose-proportional over the evaluated dose ranges. The mean elimination half-life ranged from 40 to 61 h across dose groups. Steady state was achieved by day 10 of once-daily dosing with 3.4- to 4.2-fold accumulation. Food did not have a clinically meaningful effect on ABT-288 exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the above results, 1 and 3 mg once-daily doses of ABT-288 were advanced to phase 2 evaluation in Alzheimer's patients.

Reducing olanzapine-induced weight gain side effect by using betahistine: a study in the rat model.

Olanzapine is effective at treating multiple domains of schizophrenia symptoms. However, it induces serious metabolic side effects. Antipsychotic drug's antagonistic affinity to histamine H1 receptors has been identified as a main contributor for weight gain/obesity side effects. This study therefore investigated whether a combined treatment of betahistine (a H1 receptor agonist and H3 receptor antagonist) could reduce the body weight/obesity induced by olanzapine. Female Sprague Dawley rats were treated orally with olanzapine (1 mg/kg, t.i.d.) and/or betahistine (2.67 mg/kg, t.i.d.), or vehicle for two weeks. Rats treated with olanzapine exhibited significant body weight gain and increased food intake. Co-treatment of olanzapine with betahistine significantly prevented (-45%) weight gain and reduced feeding efficiency compared to sole olanzapine treatment. Betahistine treatment alone had no effect on weight gain and food intake. Olanzapine reduced locomotor activity, but not betahistine. These findings demonstrate that olanzapine-induced body weight gain can partially be reduced by co-treatment with betahistine. Betahistine has H3 receptor antagonistic effects to increase histamine release, which may augment its direct agonistic effects on H1 receptors. These findings have important implications for clinical trials using betahistine to control antipsychotic-induced obesity side effects.

Randomized clinical study of a histamine H3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of adults with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

BACKGROUND: Psychostimulants, including methylphenidate and amphetamine preparations, are commonly prescribed for the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adults. Histamine H3 receptors reside on non-histamine neurons and regulate other neurotransmitters (e.g. acetylcholine, noradrenaline [norepinephrine]) suggesting that H3 antagonists have the potential to improve attention and impulsivity. Research indicates that H3 receptor antagonists due to their novel mechanism of action may have a unique treatment effect offering an important alternative for the treatment of ADHD. Bavisant (JNJ-31001074) is a highly selective, orally active antagonist of the human H3 receptor with a novel mechanism of action, involving wakefulness and cognition, with potential as a treatment for ADHD. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of three dosages of bavisant compared with placebo in adults with ADHD. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre study evaluated three dosages of bavisant (1 mg/day, 3 mg/day or 10 mg/day) and two active controls in adults with ADHD. The study consisted of a screening phase of up to 14 days, a 42-day double-blind treatment phase and a 7-day post-treatment follow-up phase. Efficacy and safety assessments were performed. SETTING: The study was conducted at 37 study centres in the US from April 2009 through January 2010. PARTICIPANTS: Men and women aged 18-55 years with an established diagnosis of ADHD as confirmed by clinician and self-report diagnostic measures were enrolled. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly assigned equally to one of six treatment groups: placebo, bavisant 1 mg/day, 3 mg/day or 10 mg/day, atomoxetine hydrochloride 80 mg/day or osmotic-release oral system (OROS) methylphenidate hydrochloride 54 mg/day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, Version IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline (day 1) to the end of the treatment phase (day 42), and included all randomized participants who received one or more doses of study drug and had baseline and one or more post-baseline assessments (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), laboratory tests and ECG readings. RESULTS: 430 participants were randomized, 424 received one or more doses of study medication and 335 (78%) of those randomized completed the study. Study participants had a mean age of 33.9 years and were predominantly White men. Mean treatment duration ranged from 31.4 to 38.8 days across groups. Mean change from baseline in the total ADHD-RS-IV score at day 42 (primary efficacy endpoint) was -8.8 in the placebo group versus -9.3, -11.2 and -12.2 in the bavisant 1 mg/day, 3 mg/day and 10 mg/day groups, respectively; the change in the 10 mg/day group was not statistically superior to placebo (p=0.161), and hence statistical comparisons of the 1 mg/day and 3 mg/day groups with placebo based on a step-down closed testing procedure were not performed. Mean change from baseline in the total ADHD-RS-IV score at day 42 was superior to placebo in the atomoxetine (-15.3) and OROS methylphenidate (-15.7) groups (p<0.005). Secondary efficacy assessments demonstrated a similar pattern with a non-significant trend towards improvement in the bavisant groups. The two lower dosages showed a good tolerability profile, but the higher dosage of bavisant was less well tolerated, as evidenced by the incidence of total TEAEs (61.8%, 82.4%, 89.0%), and discontinuations due to TEAEs (4.4%, 7.4%, 19.2%) in the bavisant 1 mg/day, 3 mg/day and 10 mg/day groups, respectively, compared with 58.9% and 2.7%, respectively on placebo. In the atomoxetine and OROS methylphenidate groups, the incidence of total TEAEs was 83.8% and 82.4% and discontinuations due to TEAEs was 10.8% and 8.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Bavisant, a highly selective, wakefulness-promoting H3 antagonist, did not display significant clinical effectiveness in the treatment of adults with ADHD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00880217.

Pharmacological characterization of A-960656, a histamine H3 receptor antagonist with efficacy in animal models of osteoarthritis and neuropathic pain.

Histamine H(3) receptor antagonists have been widely reported to improve performance in preclinical models of cognition, but more recently efficacy in pain models has also been described. Here, A-960656 ((R)-2-(2-(3-(piperidin-1-yl)pyrrolidin-1-yl)benzo[d]thiazol-6-yl)pyridazin-3(2H)-one) was profiled as a new structural chemotype. A-960656 was potent in vitro in histamine H(3) receptor binding assays (rat K(i)=76 nM, human K(i)=21 nM), and exhibited functional antagonism in blocking agonist-induced [(35)S]GTPγS binding (rat H(3) K(b)=107 nM, human H(3) K(b)=22 nM), and was highly specific for H(3) receptors in broad screens for non-H(3) sites. In a spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain in rat, oral doses of 1 and 3mg/kg were effective 60 min post dosing with an ED(50) of 2.17 mg/kg and a blood EC(50) of 639 ng/ml. In a model of osteoarthritis pain, oral doses of 0.1, 0.3, and 1mg/kg were effective 1h post dosing with an ED(50) of 0.52 mg/kg and a blood EC(50) of 233 ng/ml. The antinociceptive effect of A-960656 in both pain models was maintained after sub-chronic dosing up to 12 days. A-960656 had excellent rat pharmacokinetics (t(1/2)=1.9h, 84% oral bioavailability) with rapid and efficient brain penetration, and was well tolerated in CNS behavioral safety screens. In summary, A-960656 has properties well suited to probe the pharmacology of histamine H(3) receptors in pain. Its potency and efficacy in animal pain models provide support to the notion that histamine H(3) receptor antagonists are effective in attenuating nociceptive processes.

The efficacy and tolerability of two novel H(1)/H(3) receptor antagonists in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: A therapeutic role for histamine H(3) receptor antagonism in allergic rhinitis has been proposed and may be complimentary to the well-known benefits of H(1) receptor antagonism. Combined H(1)/H(3) blockade has therefore been investigated as a novel therapeutic approach that may enhance symptom relief, particularly nasal blockage. METHODS: Two novel H(1)/H(3) dual receptor antagonists were investigated in phase I and II safety and efficacy studies. One molecule (GSK1004723) was designed for intranasal administration as a suspension or solution and the other molecule (GSK835726) for oral administration. In phase I and II studies, both molecules were compared with an active control and/or placebo in randomised studies. In phase II studies, efficacy was assessed in an environmental allergen challenge chamber (ECC). Subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis were exposed to allergen to induce symptoms. Efficacy and safety was measured over 4, 7 and 20-24 h post-dose. The endpoints included total nasal symptom score and nasal blockage. RESULTS: Intranasal suspension of GSK1004723 and oral GSK835726 were well tolerated. Single-dose intranasal suspensions of GSK1004723 (220, 1,100 µg) failed to demonstrate clinically significant attenuation of symptoms of allergic rhinitis induced in the ECC. Single (10, 50, 100 mg) and 3-day repeat (10 mg) dose oral GSK835726 demonstrated clinically significant attenuation of symptoms in the ECC comparable to cetirizine 10 mg. Three-day repeat dosing of the intranasal solution GSK1004723 1,000 µg also demonstrated a statistically significant attenuation of nasal symptoms, but was less than seen with cetirizine and GSK835726 and caused initial nasal discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Combined H(1)/H(3) antagonism did not show differentiation from H(1) antagonism in reducing total nasal symptom score or nasal blockage.

The effects of an H3 receptor antagonist (PF-03654746) with fexofenadine on reducing allergic rhinitis symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Nasal H(3) receptors might have a role in mediating the effects of histamine in patients with allergic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the effect of the potent oral H(3) receptor antagonist PF-03654746 in combination with an oral H(1) receptor antagonist on the objective (acoustic rhinometry) and subjective (symptoms) responses to nasal allergen challenge. METHODS: Twenty patients with out-of-season allergic rhinitis displaying a 30% or greater decrease in minimum nasal cross-sectional area (A(min)) after bolus (ragweed) complete nasal allergen challenge at screening were studied by using a randomized, double-blind, single-dose, 4-way crossover design. Treatments included 10 mg of PF-03654746 plus 60 mg of fexofenadine (group 1), 1 mg of PF-03654746 plus 60 mg of fexofenadine (group 2), 60 mg of fexofenadine/120 mg of pseudoephedrine (group 3), and placebo (group 4). After dosing, subjects underwent complete nasal allergen challenge. Nasal symptom scores (no. of sneezes and 0- to 5-point scores for severity of congestion, itching, and rhinorrhea), A(min) (in square centimeters), and nasal volume (in cubic centimeters) were recorded 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after allergen. There was a minimum 10-day washout between periods. RESULTS: The following symptom scores were significantly (P ≤ .05) reduced by active treatments versus placebo: group 1, congestion of -0.7 (SE, 0.3), itching of -1.0 (SE, 0.3), rhinorrhea of -1.3 (SE, 0.3), and sneeze of -8.8 (SE, 1.5); group 2, itching of -0.6 (SE, 0.3), rhinorrhea of -0.8 (SE, 0.3), and sneeze of -9.1 (SE, 1.5); and group 3, rhinorrhea of -0.7 (SE, 0.3) and sneeze of -7.0 (SE, 1.5). There was no significant effect of any treatment on mean A(min) proportion or nasal volume proportion after nasal allergen challenge. CONCLUSIONS: In combination with fexofenadine, single doses of PF-03654746 caused a reduction in allergen-induced nasal symptoms. H(3) receptor antagonism might be a novel therapeutic strategy to further explore in patients with allergic rhinitis.

Using electrophysiology and in silico three-dimensional modeling to reduce human Ether-à-go-go related gene K(+) channel inhibition in a histamine H3 receptor antagonist program.

The histamine H3 receptor (H3R) plays a regulatory role in the presynaptic release of histamine and several other neurotransmitters, and thus, it is an attractive target for central nervous system indications including cognitive disorders, narcolepsy, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, and pain. The development of H3R antagonists was complicated by the similarities between the pharmacophores of H3R and human Ether-à-go-go related gene (hERG) channel blockers, a fact that probably prevented promising compounds from being progressed into the clinic. Using a three-dimensional in silico modeling approach complemented with automated and manual patch clamping, we were able to separate these two pharmacophores and to develop highly potent H3R antagonists with reduced risk of hERG liabilities from initial hit series with low selectivity identified in a high-throughput screening campaign.