A first-in-human, single and multiple dose study of lunsekimig, a novel anti-TSLP/anti-IL-13 NANOBODY® compound, in healthy volunteers.

Lunsekimig is a novel, bispecific NANOBODY® molecule that inhibits both thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and interleukin (IL)-13, two key mediators of asthma pathophysiology. In this first-in-human study, we evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and immunogenicity of lunsekimig in healthy adult participants. Participants received single ascending doses (SAD) of lunsekimig (10-400 mg intravenous [IV] or 400 mg subcutaneous [SC]) (SAD part) or multiple ascending doses (MAD part) of lunsekimig (100 or 200 mg, every 2 weeks [Q2W] for three SC doses), or placebo. Overall, 48 participants were randomized 3:1 in the SAD part and 4:1 in the MAD part for lunsekimig or placebo. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. The secondary endpoints included PK, antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and total target measurement. Lunsekimig was well tolerated and common treatment-emergent adverse events were COVID-19, nasopharyngitis, injection site reactions, and headache. Lunsekimig showed dose-proportional increases in exposure and linear elimination. Mean t1/2z of lunsekimig was around 10 days across all IV and SC doses of the SAD and MAD parts of the study. Increases in the serum concentration of total TSLP and IL-13 for lunsekimig versus placebo indicated target engagement. ADA of low titers were detected in four (11.1%) participants who received lunsekimig in the SAD, and seven (43.8%) in the MAD. In conclusion, lunsekimig was well tolerated in healthy participants with a linear PK profile up to single 400 mg IV and SC dose and multiple doses of 100 and 200 mg SC Q2W, with low immunogenicity.

Outcomes and Costs in Patients with Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Receiving Front-Line Versus Delayed Caplacizumab: A US Hospital Database Study.

European real-world data indicate that front-line treatment with caplacizumab is associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with delayed caplacizumab treatment. The objective of the study was to describe the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in hospitalized patients with an immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) episode treated with front-line versus delayed caplacizumab in the US. This retrospective cohort analysis of a US hospital database included adult patients (≥18 years) with an acute iTTP episode (a diagnosis of thrombotic microangiopathy and ≥1 therapeutic plasma exchange [TPE] procedure) from January 21, 2019, to February 28, 2021. Unadjusted baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs were compared between patients who received front-line versus delayed (<2 vs ≥2 days after TPE initiation) caplacizumab treatment. Out of 39 patients, 16 (41.0%) received front-line and 23 (59.0%) received delayed treatment with caplacizumab. Baseline characteristics and symptoms were similar between the two groups. Patients who received front-line caplacizumab treatment had significantly fewer TPE administrations (median: 5.0 vs 12.0); and a significantly shorter hospital stay (median: 9.0 days vs 16.0 days) than patients receiving delayed caplacizumab therapy. Both of these were significantly lower in comparison of means (t-test P < .01). Median inpatient costs (inclusive of caplacizumab costs) were 54% higher in the delayed treated patients than in the front-line treated patients (median: $112 711 vs $73 318). TPE-specific cost was lower in the front-line treated cohort (median: $6 989 vs $10 917). In conclusion, front-line treatment with caplacizumab had shorter hospitalizations, lower healthcare resource utilization, and lower costs than delayed caplacizumab treatment after TPE therapy.

Five years of caplacizumab - lessons learned and remaining controversies in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a rare hematologic disease caused by autoantibodies against ADAMTS-13 that trigger microangiopathic hemolytic anemia. Therapeutic plasma exchange and glucocorticoids have been the mainstay of treatment for the past 30 years. In 2019, caplacizumab was approved as an addition to this regimen for the acute treatment of iTTP. Randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence have shown that caplacizumab reduces the time to platelet count normalization, refractoriness, and exacerbations of the disease, with an acceptable safety profile. In the past 5 years, there have been arguments against the upfront use of caplacizumab in all patients with iTTP, particularly related to the perceived lack of clinical benefit, safety concerns related to bleeding risk, and high costs. This perspective aimed to address these concerns in the context of the experience of expert centers that have used the drug for >5 years.

Caplacizumab Use in a TTP Case Unresponsive to Conventional Therapy.

Introduction Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) is a rare but life-threatening disorder caused by severely reduced activity of ADAMTS13, causing platelet adhesion and formation of small-vessel platelet-rich thrombi, thrombocytopenia, and microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia. Diagnosis A 48-year-old female presented with acute generalized petechial rash, bruises, and fatigue. Bloods revealed thrombocytopenia, anaemia, 10% schistocytes. Her plasmic score was seven, and ADAMT13 was <5. Treatment Patient initially responded to plasma exchange and steroids, but thrombocytopenia recurred on day six of treatment, needing the addition of further immunosuppressive drugs and Caplacizumab. Conclusion TTP cases unresponsive to conventional regimens can represent a challenging situation; however, poor outcomes could potentially be avoided with a novel therapy like Caplacizumab. In our patient, this medication was well tolerated, and platelet count normalized after two days of its introduction.

Alternate-day dosing of caplacizumab for immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

BACKGROUND: The anti-von Willebrand factor (VWF) nanobody caplacizumab directly prevents the fatal microthrombi formation in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP), thereby adding a new therapeutic principle to the treatment of this disorder. However, real-world treatment modalities beyond clinical trials remain heterogeneous. METHODS: Here, we describe the risks and benefits of an alternate-day dosing regimen for caplacizumab by thoroughly analyzing the timing and outcome of this approach in a retrospective cohort of 25 iTTP patients treated with caplacizumab at seven different medical centers in Austria and Germany between 2018 and 2021. RESULTS: Alternate-day dosing of caplacizumab appeared feasible and led to persisting normal platelet counts in most patients. Five patients experienced iTTP exacerbations or relapses that led to the resumption of daily caplacizumab application. VWF activity was repeatedly measured in 16 of 25 patients and documented sufficient suppression by caplacizumab after 24 and 48 h in line with published pharmacodynamics. CONCLUSION: Extension of caplacizumab application intervals from daily to alternate-day dosing may be safely considered in selected patients after 3 to 4 weeks of daily treatment. Earlier modifications may be discussed in low-risk patients but require close monitoring for clinical and laboratory features of thrombotic microangiopathy.

Fatal cerebral hemorrhage in a patient with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura with a normal platelet count during treatment with caplacizumab.

Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (aTTP) is a thrombotic microangiopathy with a severe mortality and morbidity. Caplacizumab has recently been approved in the Netherlands as a new therapeutic option in patients with life-threatening organ failure due to aTTP. We describe the case of a 50 year old patient with aTTP who was referred to our hospital for treatment with caplacizumab. After undergoing treatment with plasmapheresis, prednisolone, rituximab and caplacizumab, her platelet count recovered and she was ready to be discharged. Unfortunately, before discharge she developed a fatal intra-cerebral hemorrhage. Fatal hemorrhage as an adverse event of caplacizumab has not been described before. Up to now there is no evidence-based treatment for caplacizumab induced heavy bleeding.

Cost effectiveness of caplacizumab in acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening disease characterized by thrombotic microangiopathy leading to end-organ damage. The standard of care (SOC) treatment is therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) alongside immunomodulation with steroids, with increasing use of rituximab ± other immunomodulatory agents. The addition of caplacizumab, a nanobody targeting von Willebrand factor, was shown to accelerate platelet count recovery and reduce TPE treatments and hospital length of stay in TTP patients treated in 2 major randomized clinical trials. The addition of caplacizumab to SOC also led to increased bleeding from transient reductions in von Willebrand factor and increased relapse rates. Using data from the 2 clinical trials of caplacizumab, we performed the first-ever cost-effectiveness analysis in TTP. Over a 5-year period, the projected incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in our Markov model was $1 482 260, significantly above the accepted 2019 US willingness-to-pay threshold of $195 300. One-way sensitivity analyses showed the utility of the well state and the cost of caplacizumab to have the largest effects on ICER, with a reduction in caplacizumab cost demonstrating the single greatest impact on lowering the ICER. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, SOC was favored over caplacizumab in 100% of 10 000 iterations. Our data indicate that the addition of caplacizumab to SOC in treatment of acquired TTP is not cost effective because of the high cost of the medication and its failure to improve relapse rates. The potential impact of caplacizumab on health system cost using longer term follow-up data merits further study.

Real-world experience with caplacizumab in the management of acute TTP.

The cornerstone of life-saving therapy in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) has been plasma exchange (PEX) combined with immunomodulatory strategies. Caplacizumab, a novel anti-von Willebrand factor nanobody trialed in 2 multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) leading to European Union and US Food and Drug Administration approval, has been available in the United Kingdom (UK) through a patient access scheme. Data were collected retrospectively from 2018 to 2020 for 85 patients (4 children) receiving caplacizumab from 22 UK hospitals. Patient characteristics and outcomes in the real-world clinical setting were compared with caplacizumab trial end points and historical outcomes in the precaplacizumab era. Eighty-four of 85 patients received steroid and rituximab alongside PEX; 26% required intubation. Median time to platelet count normalization (3 days), duration of PEX (7 days), and hospital stay (12 days) were comparable with RCT data. Median duration of PEX and time from PEX initiation to platelet count normalization were favorable compared with historical outcomes (P < .05). Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) recurred in 5 of 85 patients; all had persistent ADAMTS13 activity < 5 IU/dL. Of 31 adverse events in 26 patients, 17 of 31 (55%) were bleeding episodes, and 5 of 31 (16%) were thrombotic events (2 unrelated to caplacizumab); mortality was 6% (5/85), with no deaths attributed to caplacizumab. In 4 of 5 deaths, caplacizumab was introduced >48 hours after PEX initiation (3-21 days). This real-world evidence represents the first and largest series of TTP patients, including pediatric patients, receiving caplacizumab outside of clinical trials. Representative of true clinical practice, the findings provide valuable information for clinicians treating TTP globally.

A regimen with caplacizumab, immunosuppression, and plasma exchange prevents unfavorable outcomes in immune-mediated TTP.

The anti-von Willebrand factor nanobody caplacizumab was licensed for adults with immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) based on prospective controlled trials. However, few data are available on postmarketing surveillance. We treated 90 iTTP patients with a compassionate frontline triplet regimen associating therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), immunosuppression with corticosteroids and rituximab, and caplacizumab. Outcomes were compared with 180 historical patients treated with the standard frontline treatment (TPE and corticosteroids, with rituximab as salvage therapy). The primary outcome was a composite of refractoriness and death within 30 days since diagnosis. Key secondary outcomes were exacerbations, time to platelet count recovery, the number of TPE, and the volume of plasma required to achieve durable remission. The percentage of patients in the triplet regimen with the composite primary outcome was 2.2% vs 12.2% in historical patients (P = .01). One elderly patient in the triplet regimen died of pulmonary embolism. Patients from this cohort experienced less exacerbations (3.4% vs 44%, P < .01); they recovered durable platelet count 1.8 times faster than historical patients (95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.36; P < .01), with fewer TPE sessions and lower plasma volumes (P < .01 both). The number of days in hospital was 41% lower in the triplet regimen than in the historical cohort (13 vs 22 days; P < .01). Caplacizumab-related adverse events occurred in 46 patients (51%), including 13 major or clinically relevant nonmajor hemorrhagic events. Associating caplacizumab to TPE and immunosuppression, by addressing the 3 processes of iTTP pathophysiology, prevents unfavorable outcomes and alleviates the burden of care.

Role of caplacizumab in the treatment of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura is a rare blood disorder with a high early mortality rate, if untreated. Standard of care plasma exchange and glucocorticoids have dramatically improved survival. However, additional advancements are necessary to further decrease mortality. Caplacizumab-yhdp (Cablivi®) is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment indicated for adult patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, in combination with plasma exchange and immunosuppressive therapy. However, there are considerable risks associated with the use of caplacizumab and they must be weighed against the benefits of the medication.

Nanobody-based therapeutics against colorectal cancer: Precision therapies based on the personal mutanome profile and tumor neoantigens.

Monoclonal antibodies and vaccines have widely been studied for the immunotherapy of cancer, while their large size appears to limit their functionality in solid tumors, in large part due to unique properties of tumor microenvironment such as high pressure of tumor interstitial fluid. To tackle such limitations, smaller formats of antibodies have been developed, including antigen-binding fragments, single-chain variable fragments, single variable domain of camelid antibody (so-called nanobody (Nb) or VHH). Of these, Nbs offer great immunotherapy potentials because of their advantageous physicochemical and pharmacological features, including small size, high stability, and excellent tissue penetration. Besides, the therapeutic impacts of Nbs can be improved by their modifications and functionalizations (e.g., PEGylation and conjugation to the Fc domain, peptide tags, drugs, toxins, aptamers, and radionuclides). This review aims to provide comprehensive insights into key signaling networks of colorectal cancer and discuss Nb-based precision immunotherapy of colorectal cancer.

Caplacizumab treatment for acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (HERCULES trial).

CLINICAL QUESTION: In people with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), does caplacizumab decrease the time to normalisation of the platelet count and the risk of death and complications caused by thrombotic events and organ damage? EVIDENCE FROM TRIAL: In adults with acquired TTP, caplacizumab decreased the time to normalisation of the platelet count and decreased the risk of TTP-related death and recurrence of TTP.

Caplacizumab as an emerging treatment option for acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare disease with a mortality rate of over 90% if left untreated. Therapeutic plasma exchange (PEX) is the mainstay of treatment of acquired TTP (aTTP), and with the introduction of PEX, the mortality rate declined dramatically below 20%. Although PEX together with corticosteroids are the backbone of the upfront management of patients with aTTP with successful outcomes, patients may remain refractory and/or relapse following an initial response to this treatment. There are some therapeutic options, which can be used among these patients, helping in improving outcomes of aTTP. Caplacizumab (formerly ALX-0081 or ALX-0681) is a humanized single-variable domain immunoglobulin that recognizes the human von Willebrand factor (vWF) A1 domain and inhibits the vWF-platelet glycoprotein 1b-alpha (GP1b-α) interaction. The drug was first developed for the prevention of thrombosis in high-risk patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention; however, drug development for this indication has been discontinued. Recently, caplacizumab received its first approval following Phase II TITAN and Phase III HERCULES trials in the European Union (EU) for the treatment of acute episode of aTTP in adult patients, in addition to PEX and immunosuppression. This review focuses on the use of caplacizumab as an emerging treatment option in patients with aTTP.

Clinical pharmacology of caplacizumab for the treatment of patients with acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Introduction: Caplacizumab is a humanized anti-von Willebrand Factor (vWF) Nanobody® for the treatment of acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (aTTP). Caplacizumab targets the A1-domain of vWF, inhibiting the interaction between vWF and platelets. Clinical studies conducted in aTTP patients confirmed the rapid and sustained complete suppression of the vWF activity using an initial intravenous dose of 10 mg, and a maintenance subcutaneous 10 mg daily dosing regimen, with corresponding favorable efficacy and safety profiles. Areas covered: The pharmacokinetics of caplacizumab are non-linear, characterized by a target-mediated disposition and the exposure is dependent upon drug and target concentration over time. The pharmacokinetics of caplacizumab are predictable when considering the turn-over of the circulating vWF and its modulation by the drug over time. Renal and hepatic impairment are not expected to influence the exposure to the drug, and no direct or indirect drug-drug pharmacokinetic interactions are anticipated based on the mechanism of action and the specificity of the pharmacodynamic effect of caplacizumab. Expert opinion: Caplacizumab prevents the interaction between vWF and platelets, offering a direct and rapid therapeutic intervention to stop microthrombosis. The combination of caplacizumab with plasma exchange and immunosuppression represents an important, potentially life-saving advance in the treatment of aTTP patients.

Caplacizumab Treatment for Acquired Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura.

BACKGROUND: In acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), an immune-mediated deficiency of the von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease ADAMTS13 allows unrestrained adhesion of von Willebrand factor multimers to platelets and microthrombosis, which result in thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, and tissue ischemia. Caplacizumab, an anti-von Willebrand factor humanized, bivalent variable-domain-only immunoglobulin fragment, inhibits interaction between von Willebrand factor multimers and platelets. METHODS: In this double-blind, controlled trial, we randomly assigned 145 patients with TTP to receive caplacizumab (10-mg intravenous loading bolus, followed by 10 mg daily subcutaneously) or placebo during plasma exchange and for 30 days thereafter. The primary outcome was the time to normalization of the platelet count, with discontinuation of daily plasma exchange within 5 days thereafter. Key secondary outcomes included a composite of TTP-related death, recurrence of TTP, or a thromboembolic event during the trial treatment period; recurrence of TTP at any time during the trial; refractory TTP; and normalization of organ-damage markers. RESULTS: The median time to normalization of the platelet count was shorter with caplacizumab than with placebo (2.69 days [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.89 to 2.83] vs. 2.88 days [95% CI, 2.68 to 3.56], P=0.01), and patients who received caplacizumab were 1.55 times as likely to have a normalization of the platelet count as those who received placebo. The percentage of patients with a composite outcome event was 74% lower with caplacizumab than with placebo (12% vs. 49%, P<0.001). The percentage of patients who had a recurrence of TTP at any time during the trial was 67% lower with caplacizumab than with placebo (12% vs. 38%, P<0.001). Refractory disease developed in no patients in the caplacizumab group and in three patients in the placebo group. Patients who received caplacizumab needed less plasma exchange and had a shorter hospitalization than those who received placebo. The most common adverse event was mucocutaneous bleeding, which was reported in 65% of the patients in the caplacizumab group and in 48% in the placebo group. During the trial treatment period, three patients in the placebo group died. One patient in the caplacizumab group died from cerebral ischemia after the end of the treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with TTP, treatment with caplacizumab was associated with faster normalization of the platelet count; a lower incidence of a composite of TTP-related death, recurrence of TTP, or a thromboembolic event during the treatment period; and a lower rate of recurrence of TTP during the trial than placebo. (Funded by Ablynx; HERCULES ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02553317 .).

A review on nanoparticle-based technologies for biodetoxification.

Nanotechnology has gained significant penetration to different fields of medicine including drug delivery, disease interrogation, targeting and bio-imaging. In recent years, efforts have been put forth to assess the use of this technology in biodetoxification. In this review, we will discuss the current status of nanostructured biomaterials/nanoparticle (NP)-based technologies as a candidate biodetoxifying agent. Patient hospitalization due to illicit drug consumption, suicidal attempts and accidental toxin exposure are major challenges in the medical field. Overdoses of drugs/toxic chemicals or exposure to bacterial toxins or poisons are conventionally treated by voiding the stomach, administering activated charcoal or by using specific antidotes, if the toxin is known. Because of the limitations of these methods for safe and effective detoxification, advancements in nanotechnology may offer novel ways in intoxication support by using nanostructured biomaterials, such as liposomes, micellar nanocarriers, liquid crystalline nanoassemblies and ligand-based NPs.