Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
5.
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed) ; 109(1): 58-62, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28969846

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Although Mercromina Film and other topical antiseptics are widely used, they are not included in the standard series recommended by the Spanish Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergy Research Group for testing suspected allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Furthermore, no recent studies have investigated the allergenic potential of merbromin. OBJECTIVE: To determine the allergenic potential of merbromin and compare it with that of other topical antiseptics widely used in clinical practice, including povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, and eosin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective single-center observational safety study of 105 patients with suspected ACD seen at the dermatology department of our hospital. RESULTS: Of the 105 patients studied, 1.9% had a positive patch test to merbromin and 12.4% were sensitized to povidone-iodine. The differences in the proportion of patients with ACD to Betadine Solución Dérmica (povidone-iodine) compared with the rest of the antiseptics was statistically significant (McNemar test, P<.05). No adverse reactions were observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the patch tests conducted, Mercromina Film has very low allergenic potential. The highest allergenic potential was observed for povidone-iodine.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Merbromina/efectos adversos , Antiinfecciosos Locales/inmunología , Clorhexidina/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/análogos & derivados , Clorhexidina/inmunología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Eosina Amarillenta-(YS)/efectos adversos , Humanos , Merbromina/inmunología , Pruebas del Parche , Povidona Yodada/efectos adversos , Povidona Yodada/inmunología , Estudios Prospectivos , Timerosal/efectos adversos , Timerosal/inmunología
6.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 173(4): 233-236, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28848174

RESUMEN

We present the case of a 77-year-old female patient who suffered from severe anaphylaxis during wound care. Allergologic evaluation yielded specific IgE antibodies to chlorhexidine, but anaphylaxis to chlorhexidine was not congruent with the patient history and dermal provocation tests. However, skin prick tests provided evidence for a sensitization to polyhexanide that was further supported by the detection of specific IgE antibodies to polyhexanide, the results of basophil activation tests and IgE inhibition analysis. We presume cross-reactive IgE antibodies binding to both biguanide antiseptics and identified polyhexanide as the likely cause of the anaphylactic reaction. We recognize polyhexanide as an emerging allergen that has to be considered as a cause of anaphylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Antiinfecciosos Locales/inmunología , Biguanidas/efectos adversos , Desinfectantes/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Anciano , Alérgenos/inmunología , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/inmunología , Biguanidas/inmunología , Reacciones Cruzadas , Desinfectantes/inmunología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/inmunología , Pruebas Cutáneas
10.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 167(1): 16-20, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26111940

RESUMEN

Chlorhexidine is a commonly used antiseptic and disinfectant in the health-care setting. Its usage has increased in recent years with intensive campaigns and infection control guidelines to combat hospital-acquired infections. As a result, patients and health-care workers (HCW) are exposed to increasing chlorhexidine usage. In recent years, adverse reactions to chlorhexidine ranging from allergic contact dermatitis, photosensitivity, fixed drug eruptions, urticaria and anaphylactic shock have been reported. Most have been isolated case reports on adverse reactions occurring in healthy individuals or HCW. We report a case of anaphylactic shock caused by applying chlorhexidine cleansing solution and masquerading as septic shock from left-leg necrotising fasciitis.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/inmunología , Antiinfecciosos Locales/inmunología , Clorhexidina/inmunología , Choque Séptico/inmunología , Anciano , Anafilaxia/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas Cutáneas , Urticaria
11.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 42(1): 44-9, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23265264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chlorhexidine is widely used as an antiseptic agent. It is a potentially allergenic substance that can cause severe hypersensitivity reactions. OBJECTIVE: We describe six patients who had anaphylactic reactions attributed to chlorhexidine during surgery. These patients were exposed to chlorhexidine in gels, swabs and catheters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six patients from three UK centres with clinical history suggestive of anaphylaxis during surgery are reported. Detailed history, review of case notes, determination of chlorhexidine specific IgE, mast cell tryptase and skin tests were performed. RESULTS: On detailed assessment five of six patients demonstrated a previous history of reactions on re-exposure to chlorhexidine. All six patients had elevated specific IgE to chlorhexidine. Skin prick test with chlorhexidine was performed in four of the six patients and was found to be positive. CONCLUSION: Immediate hypersensitivity to chlorhexidine appears to be common but underreported in the UK. We recommend that centres investigating patients with reactions during anaesthesia and surgery should routinely include testing for chlorhexidine allergy.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Antiinfecciosos Locales/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Anciano , Alérgenos/inmunología , Anafilaxia/etiología , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/inmunología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/inmunología , Cistoscopía , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pruebas Cutáneas , Reino Unido , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos
12.
Skin Pharmacol Physiol ; 24(5): 245-55, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21508658

RESUMEN

Currently, there are no generally accepted definitions for wounds at risk of infection. In clinical practice, too many chronic wounds are regarded as being at risk of infection, and therefore many topical antimicrobials - in terms of frequency and duration of use - are applied to wounds. Based on expert discussion and current knowledge, a clinical assessment score was developed. The objective of this wounds at risk (W.A.R.) score is to allow decision-making on the indication for the use of antiseptics on the basis of polihexanide. The proposed clinical classification of W.A.R. shall facilitate the decision for wound antisepsis and allow an appropriate general treatment regimen with the focus on the prevention of wound infection. The W.A.R. score is based on a clinically oriented risk assessment using concrete patient circumstances. The indication for the use of antiseptics results from the addition of differently weighted risk causes, for which points are assigned. Antimicrobial treatment is justified in the case of 3 or more points.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Biguanidas/uso terapéutico , Infección de Heridas/prevención & control , Heridas y Lesiones/clasificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/inmunología , Biguanidas/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunocompetencia , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de Heridas/microbiología , Heridas y Lesiones/microbiología , Heridas y Lesiones/fisiopatología
13.
Antiviral Res ; 88 Suppl 1: S3-9, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21109065

RESUMEN

A combination of prevention and treatment modalities will be needed to successfully control the global spread of HIV. Microbicides, drug products topically applied to mucosal surfaces to prevent HIV infection, are one of these biomedical interventions that hold great promise. In order to be efficacious, microbicides must overcome several challenges imposed by the mucosal microenvironment they intend to protect and the mischievous human immunodeficiency virus with its enormous capacity to adapt. Recent data, however, supports the establishment of the primo-infection by only a small number of founder viruses, which are highly vulnerable to microbicidal intervention at the initial stages of mucosal invasion. The biological foundation of these challenges and opportunities in microbicide development is explored in this review. This article forms part of a special supplement on presentations covering HIV transmission and microbicides, based on the symposium "Trends in Microbicide Formulations", held on 25 and 26 January 2010, Arlington, VA.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , VIH/efectos de los fármacos , VIH/inmunología , Vagina/virología , Administración Intravaginal , Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/efectos de los fármacos , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/virología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/virología , Diseño de Fármacos , Células Epiteliales/efectos de los fármacos , Células Epiteliales/virología , Femenino , VIH/patogenicidad , Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Humanos , Masculino , Membrana Mucosa/efectos de los fármacos , Membrana Mucosa/inmunología , Membrana Mucosa/virología , Vagina/efectos de los fármacos , Vagina/inmunología , Acoplamiento Viral/efectos de los fármacos
14.
Exp Parasitol ; 124(3): 306-14, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19944688

RESUMEN

Philasterides dicentrarchi is a histophagous scuticociliate causes fatal scuticociliatosis in farmed olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus. The average monthly prevalence of scuticociliatosis due to P. dicentrarchi infections was increased from May to July (40+/-3.1% to 79.4+/-1.7%) and it decreased from August to November (63+/-2.3% to 30+/-2.6%) in olive flounder farms at Jeju Island, South Korea during 2000-2006. The prevalence of mixed infection along with Vibrio spp. bacterial infection was 49+/-7.2% than that of other mixed infection. At present no effective control measure for P. dicentrarchi infection has been described and large production losses continue. In the present study, formalin, hydrogen peroxide and Jenoclean chemotheraputants were used for bath treatment. Among Jenoclean at a low concentration of 50ppm proved effective. The results were confirmed with in vitro motility assessments and morphological changes scoring system in P. dicentrarchi. On the other hand, similar trend was noted following hydrogen peroxide treatment at this concentration, but formalin was only moderately effective. Either hydrogen peroxide or Jenoclean are the promising compounds effective at low concentrations with short application time for P. dicentrarchi. Therefore, these substances were evaluated on day 10, 20 and 30 for their ability to enhance innate immune response and disease resistance against P. dicentrarchi in olive flounder after chemotheraputants bath treatment with 100ppm for 30min per day. All the tested immune parameters were enhanced by treatment with Jenoclean, but not formalin and hydrogen peroxide. These findings suggest that Jenoclean bath treatment can be used for ensuring the heath of cultured marine fish against internal parasites such as P. dicentrarchi.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/farmacología , Infecciones por Cilióforos/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Peces/tratamiento farmacológico , Lenguado/parasitología , Inmunomodulación/efectos de los fármacos , Oligohimenóforos/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antiinfecciosos Locales/inmunología , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/veterinaria , Infecciones por Cilióforos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Cilióforos/epidemiología , Proteínas del Sistema Complemento/análisis , Proteínas del Sistema Complemento/inmunología , Desinfectantes/inmunología , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Desinfectantes/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades de los Peces/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Peces/parasitología , Explotaciones Pesqueras , Formaldehído/inmunología , Formaldehído/farmacología , Formaldehído/uso terapéutico , Peróxido de Hidrógeno/inmunología , Peróxido de Hidrógeno/farmacología , Peróxido de Hidrógeno/uso terapéutico , Movimiento/efectos de los fármacos , Muramidasa/sangre , Oligohimenóforos/inmunología , Oligohimenóforos/fisiología , Fagocitosis/efectos de los fármacos , Prevalencia , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estallido Respiratorio/efectos de los fármacos , Estaciones del Año , Agua de Mar , Zeolitas/inmunología , Zeolitas/farmacología , Zeolitas/uso terapéutico
16.
Coll Antropol ; 31(3): 751-6, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18041384

RESUMEN

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of contact sensitivity in patients with leg ulcers, and possible difference in the rate of contact hypersensitivity to standard series of allergens used in patch testing, and to particular topical agents used in local therapy of leg ulcers in special series, patients with and without atopy. The study included 60 patients, 45 female and 15 male, aged 37-85 (mean 68.37 female and 51.13 male), 30 of them with and 30 without allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) of the leg (control group). The mean duration of leg ulceration was 5.62 years. The two groups of patients underwent testing to standard series allergens and target series allergens including mupirocin, bepanthene, silver sulfadiazine, chloramphenicol + clostridiopeptidase, betamethasone dipropionate, hydrocortisone + oxytetracycline, momethasone, alginate, hydrocolloid, lanolin, pyrogallol, Vaseline, permanganate, Rivanol, povidone-iodine, gentamicin, i.e. local agents most frequently used by the patients. Contact allergic hypersensitivity to standard series allergens was demonstrated in 25 patients with a total of 49 positive reactions and a mean of 1.6 reactions per patient. Positive reactions were most commonly recorded to balsam of Peru, fragrance mix and neomycin sulfate. There were 12 positive reactions to target series allergens, mean 0.4 reactions per patient. Forty-five positive reactions, mean 0.1 reactions per patient, were recorded in the control group. Positive reactions were most commonly demonstrated to corticosteroid ointments, lanolin and bepanthene. Study results did not confirm a statistically significantly higher rate of sensitization to particular topical agents frequently used in the treatment of patients with venous ulcers. Patch testing to standard and special series allergens should be performed in case of prolonged leg ulcer epithelization.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Erupciones por Medicamentos/prevención & control , Úlcera Varicosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Úlcera Varicosa/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiinfecciosos Locales/efectos adversos , Antiinfecciosos Locales/inmunología , Bálsamos/efectos adversos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedad Crónica , Croacia/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia
17.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 98(6): 563-6, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17601270

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bacitracin is a commonly used topical antibiotic that has on occasion been reported to cause anaphylaxis. Evidence of the role of bacitracin specific IgE in such reactions has been demonstrated by skin testing. Because of the potential for provoking a systemic reaction by skin testing, it would be advantageous to develop an in vitro test for bacitracin specific IgE. OBJECTIVE: To report our experience coupling bacitracin to a solid phase and using it to detect specific IgE to bacitracin by fluorescent enzyme immunoassay. METHODS: A patient with a history of recurrent anaphylaxis that developed after application of triple antibiotic ointment to an open wound underwent skin testing with triple antibiotic ointment. Bacitracin was biotinylated and coupled to streptavidin ImmunoCAPs. IgE against bacitracin in the patient's serum was detected by fluorescent enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Topical application of triple antibiotic ointment to intact skin produced a 7 X 8-mm wheal with pseudopods. IgE against bacitracin was detected using biotinylated bacitracin-streptavidin ImmunoCAPs at a level of approximately 0.6 KUA/L and confirmed with ImmunoCAPs using direct coupling of bacitracin to the solid phase. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the presence of IgE antibodies to bacitracin in a patient with anaphylaxis to triple antibiotic ointment using a recently described procedure for producing custom allergen solid phases for immunoassay.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/efectos adversos , Bacitracina/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Anafilaxia/sangre , Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Antiinfecciosos Locales/inmunología , Bacitracina/inmunología , Biotinilación , Combinación de Medicamentos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/sangre , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/inmunología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neomicina/efectos adversos , Polimixina B/efectos adversos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Pruebas Cutáneas , Estreptavidina
18.
Nat Biotechnol ; 24(12): 1551-7, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17160061

RESUMEN

Short cationic amphiphilic peptides with antimicrobial and/or immunomodulatory activities are present in virtually every life form, as an important component of (innate) immune defenses. These host-defense peptides provide a template for two separate classes of antimicrobial drugs. Direct-acting antimicrobial host-defense peptides can be rapid-acting and potent, and possess an unusually broad spectrum of activity; consequently, they have prospects as new antibiotics, although clinical trials to date have shown efficacy only as topical agents. But for these compounds to fulfill their therapeutic promise and overcome clinical setbacks, further work is needed to understand their mechanisms of action and reduce the potential for unwanted toxicity, to make them more resistant to protease degradation and improve serum half-life, as well as to devise means of manufacturing them on a large scale in a consistent and cost-effective manner. In contrast, the role of cationic host-defense peptides in modulating the innate immune response and boosting infection-resolving immunity while dampening potentially harmful pro-inflammatory (septic) responses gives these peptides the potential to become an entirely new therapeutic approach against bacterial infections.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/farmacología , Péptidos Catiónicos Antimicrobianos/farmacología , Diseño de Fármacos , Antiinfecciosos Locales/química , Antiinfecciosos Locales/inmunología , Péptidos Catiónicos Antimicrobianos/química , Péptidos Catiónicos Antimicrobianos/inmunología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto
20.
Burns ; 31(5): 539-47, 2005 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15955636

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The introduction of early excision of the burn eschar has contributed to a reduction in burn-related mortality but is not appropriate in all circumstances. Cerium nitrate has been used since 1976, usually in combination with silver sulphadiazine, to improve outcome where early excision is not performed. However, has still not gained universal acceptance. The evidence for its use is reviewed. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed for the years 1966-2003 using keywords 'cerium', 'sulphadiazine', 'Flammacerium', 'lanthanides' and 'topical therapy for burns'. The reference lists of key articles were then sifted for other relevant articles. RESULTS: Cerium has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity in the treatment of severe burns. This benefit is derived from its action on the burn eschar. It binds and denatures the lipid protein complex liberated from burnt skin that is responsible for the profound immunosuppression associated with major cutaneous burns. It has only limited antimicrobial properties. CONCLUSIONS: Cerium nitrate is an excellent topical treatment for most cutaneous burns not undergoing immediate excision and closure.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Quemaduras/tratamiento farmacológico , Cerio/uso terapéutico , Animales , Antiinfecciosos Locales/química , Antiinfecciosos Locales/inmunología , Cerio/química , Cerio/inmunología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunidad Celular/inmunología , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA