Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 716
Filtrar
1.
J Prev Med Hyg ; 65(1): E98-E104, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706760

RESUMEN

In recent years, diphtheria has re-emerged in areas with inadequate vaccination coverage, and Europe has not been spared with several cases among migrants. Diphtheria is a potentially fatal infection caused mainly by toxigenic strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Due to the high mortality rate, especially among young children, the fight against diphtheria is considered one of the first conquests of immunization. In the history of medicine, there is a unique case of an unconventional response to a diphtheria outbreak in which sled dogs were used to overcome the supply difficulties of diphtheria antitoxin. The mass media followed the medical response to the outbreak and raised audience awareness of public health issues. The facts of Nome, Alaska, in 1925 can serve as a catalyst to rethink conventional responses to diphtheria outbreaks in low-income countries today and promote mass media awareness of public health importance.


Asunto(s)
Difteria , Difteria/prevención & control , Difteria/historia , Animales , Humanos , Historia del Siglo XX , Perros , Alaska , Togo , Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Brotes de Enfermedades , Antitoxina Diftérica/historia , Estaciones del Año
2.
Immun Inflamm Dis ; 11(11): e1096, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38018582

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine into childhood immunization programs resulted in its widespread elimination in high-income countries. However, Nigeria is currently experiencing an outbreak. The primary cause of diphtheria outbreaks and its high mortality rates in Nigeria was waning herd immunity due to low DTP coverage and a lack of diphtheria antitoxin (DAT), respectively. However, the underlying causes of Nigeria's low DTP coverage and DAT supply remain unknown. METHOD: Relevant studies and reports included in our review were obtained by a search through Google Scholar, PubMed, and organization websites using the terms "Diphtheria-Pertussis-Tetanus vaccine OR Diphtheria antitoxin and Nigeria OR Diphtheria Outbreak." All articles considering diphtheria outbreaks, DTP vaccine, and DAT supply in Nigeria were considered without time restriction due to the paucity of data. We used the narrative synthesis approach to critically appraise, analyze, and draw inferences from the selected articles. RESULTS: The main causes of low DTP coverage are insufficient supply, an inefficient cold chain system, and low uptake due to poor health literacy and negative sociocultural and religious beliefs, whereas the key barriers to DAT availability are insufficient production by pharmaceutical industries because of low demand and priority. CONCLUSION: The underlying causes of Nigeria's low DTP coverage and DAT supply are multifactorial. Both short-term and long-term measures are needed to control this outbreak and prevent future occurrences.


Asunto(s)
Difteria , Humanos , Niño , Difteria/epidemiología , Difteria/prevención & control , Antitoxina Diftérica , Nigeria/epidemiología , Vacuna contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina , Corynebacterium , Brotes de Enfermedades
3.
Biologicals ; 82: 101682, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37149975

RESUMEN

The International Standard for Diphtheria Antitoxin Equine is essential for the standardisation of assays used to determine the potency of therapeutic diphtheria antitoxin products produced from equine serum. This paper describes the production and characterization of the 2nd International Standard for Diphtheria Antitoxin Equine and its calibration in International Units. Calibration was performed by toxin neutralization test in vivo and in vitro (Vero cell assay), and potency was expressed relative to the 1st International Standard to ensure continuity of the International Unit. The candidate standard (NIBSC product code 18/180) was assigned a unitage of 57 IU/ampoule based on results from 14 laboratories in 9 different countries and was established by the World Health Organisation Expert Committee on Biological Standardization in 2021.


Asunto(s)
Antitoxina Diftérica , Chlorocebus aethiops , Animales , Caballos , Calibración , Estándares de Referencia , Células Vero , Organización Mundial de la Salud
4.
Infection ; 51(2): 489-495, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36178603

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Raising awareness of respiratory diphtheria and for the importance of early antitoxin administration. METHODS: Report of a case of fulminant, imported respiratory diphtheria in an otherwise healthy 24-year-old Afghan refugee in Austria in May 2022. RESULT: This was the first case of respiratory diphtheria in Austria since 1993. Diphtheria antitoxin was administered at an already progressed disease stage. This delay contributed to a fulminant disease course with multiorgan failure and death. CONCLUSION: In high-income countries with low case numbers, awareness of respiratory diphtheria and for the importance of early antitoxin administration must be raised.


Asunto(s)
Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Difteria , Refugiados , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Difteria/diagnóstico , Difteria/tratamiento farmacológico , Austria , Antitoxina Diftérica
5.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 111, 2022 01 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35033034

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the last local case of diphtheria in 1992, there had not been any case in Singapore until an autochthonous case was reported in 2017. This fatal diphtheria case of a migrant worker raised concerns about the potential re-emergence of locally transmitted toxigenic diphtheria in Singapore. We conducted a seroprevalence study to assess the immunity levels to diphtheria among migrant workers in Singapore. METHODS: Residual sera from migrant workers who hailed from Bangladesh, China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar and the Philippines were tested for anti-diphtheria toxoid immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies. These migrant workers previously participated in a survey between 2016 and 2019 and had provided blood samples as part of the survey procedure. RESULTS: A total of 2176 migrant workers were included in the study. Their overall mean age was 27.1 years (standard deviation 5.0), range was 20-43 years. The proportion having at least basic protection against diphtheria (antitoxin titres ≥ 0.01 IU/ml) ranged from 77.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.8 - 82.3%) among migrant workers from Bangladesh to 96.7% (95% CI 92.5 - 98.6%) in those hailing from Malaysia. The proportion showing full protection (antitoxin titres ≥ 0.10 IU/ml) ranged from 10.1% (95% CI 6.5 - 15.4%) in Chinese workers to 23.0% (95% CI 17.1 - 30.3%) in Malaysian workers. There were no significant differences in the proportion with at least basic protection across birth cohorts, except for those from Bangladesh where the seroprevalence was significantly lower in younger migrant workers born after 1989. CONCLUSIONS: The proportions having at least basic protection against diphtheria in migrant workers from five out of seven Asian countries (India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar and the Philippines) were higher than 85%, the threshold for diphtheria herd immunity. Seroprevalence surveys should be conducted periodically to assess the level of immunity against diphtheria and other vaccine preventable diseases in migrant worker population, so that appropriate interventions such as booster vaccination can be implemented proactively to prevent sporadic outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
Difteria , Migrantes , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos , Difteria/epidemiología , Difteria/prevención & control , Antitoxina Diftérica , Toxoide Diftérico , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Singapur/epidemiología
7.
Can Bull Med Hist ; 38(2): 285-319, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34403611

RESUMEN

This article examines the history of diphtheria in the Yukon and the Mackenzie district of the Northwest Territories in the first half of the 20th century. This analysis follows the traces of this now largely forgotten disease and its treatment to illuminate the constraints - intrinsic and constructed - on the provision of health care commensurate with the expectations and needs of northern Indigenous peoples. While diphtheria was never the most serious infectious disease, nor a major cause of death compared with tuberculosis or influenza at this time, examining its history offers significant insight into the creation of medical and public health infrastructures in Canada's northern territories, and the ways in which those infrastructures served, and failed to serve, different northern populations.


Asunto(s)
Antitoxina Diftérica , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Instituciones de Salud , Territorios del Noroeste , El Yukón
8.
Vaccimonitor (La Habana, Print) ; 30(1)ene.-abr. 2021. tab
Artículo en Español | CUMED, LILACS | ID: biblio-1150247

RESUMEN

La uveítis anterior no infecciosa es una enfermedad inflamatoria del ojo que afecta al tracto uveal y que puede causar ceguera total y otras discapacidades visuales. Esta enfermedad se ubica en el espectro de enfermedades autoinmunes y autoinflamatorias. Se han descrito respuestas no adecuadas a la vacunación en enfermedades mediadas por el sistema inmune, por lo que se evaluaron los niveles de antitoxina tetánica y diftérica en pacientes cubanos con uveítis anterior no infecciosa, relacionada con el alelo HLA-B27. Se determinaron los niveles de antitoxina tetánica y diftérica mediante ELISA en 190 pacientes con uveítis anterior no infecciosa y controles supuestamente sanos. El 97,37 por ciento de los pacientes con uveítis mostraron niveles de protección de antitoxina tetánica mayor o igual a 0,1 UI/mL, similar a lo observado en los controles sanos (98,95 por ciento) (p=0,4385). Las proporciones de pacientes con uveítis anterior no infecciosa y sus controles en los diferentes niveles de protección de antitoxina tetánica fueron similares (p>0,05), al igual que los títulos medios geométricos (p=0,2907). En los pacientes con uveítis, de 65 años o más, se detectó una mayor proporción de individuos con títulos protectores de larga duración (>1,0 UI/mL) de antitoxina diftérica (p=0,0065). En los pacientes con uveítis no se observó asociación entre la presencia del alelo HLA-B27 y la respuesta de anticuerpos frente al toxoide tetánico (p=0,6196) y diftérico (p=0,1917). El 37,9 por ciento de los pacientes con uveítis y el 42 por ciento de los controles, presentaron títulos no protectores (<0,1 UI/mL) de antitoxina diftérica (0,1148). La mayoría de los pacientes con uveítis anterior no infecciosa y los controles supuestamente sanos presentaron protección frente al toxoide tetánico; mientras que, en los pacientes con uveítis, así como en los controles supuestamente sanos, con edad igual o más de 18 años, se debe reevaluar incluir refuerzos con toxoide diftérico para alcanzar mayores niveles de protección frente a la difteria(AU)


Non-infectious anterior uveitis is an inflammatory disease of the eye that affects the uveal tract and can cause total blindness and other visual disabilities. Autoimmune and inflammatory diseases are associated with qualitative and quantitative alterations in the immune response; therefore, the levels of tetanus and diphtheria antitoxin related to the HLA-B27 allele were evaluated in Cuban patients with non-infectious anterior uveitis. Tetanus and diphtheria antitoxin levels were determined by ELISA in 190 patients with non-infectious anterior uveitis and healthy control individuals. 97.37 percent of patients with uveitis showed protective tetanus antitoxin levels greater than and equal to 0.1 IU/mL as well as healthy controls (98.95 percent) (p=0.4385). The proportions of patients with non-infectious anterior uveitis and presumably healthy controls in the different levels of protective tetanus antitoxin were similar (p>0.05) at all levels of protection, as were the geometric mean titers for this antitoxin (p=0.2907). Patients with uveitis aged 65 years or older had a higher proportion of individuals with long-term reliable protective titers (>1.0 IU/mL) of diphtheria antitoxin (p=0.0065). In uveitis patients, no association was observed between the presence of the HLA-B27 allele and the antibody response against tetanus toxoid (p=0.6196) and diphtheria (p=0.1917). Similarly, 37.9 percent of patients with uveitis and 42 percent of their controls had non-protective titers (<0.1 IU/mL) of diphtheria antitoxin (0.1148). Most patients with anterior uveitis and control subjects were protected against tetanus (p>0.05), while in patients with uveitis and supposedly healthy controls, aged 18 years or older, the administration of booster doses with diphtheria toxoid should be reevaluated to achieve higher levels of protection against diphtheria(AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Antitoxina Diftérica , Antitoxina Tetánica , Antígeno HLA-B27 , Uveítis Anterior/diagnóstico , Vacunas , Cuba
9.
J Med Biogr ; 29(3): 169-175, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31679441

RESUMEN

A founder of paleopathology, the study of disease in ancient human remains, Sir Marc Armand Ruffer, MD (1859-1917) served in Egypt, from 1896 to 1917, as a public-health administrator, epidemiologist, and pathologist. He was professor of Bacteriology at the Cairo Medical School, President of the Sanitary, Maritime, and Quarantine Council, member of the Indian Plague Commission, and author or co-author of 40 papers in palaeopathology. However, little is known of his early professional life, which encompassed his education, medical training, and research in England and France. The pre-Egyptian period, 1878 to 1896, was a time of extraordinary activity. Acquiring four academic Degrees at Oxford University and clinical experience at the University College Hospital, London (1878-1889), he was the clinical assistant of Louis Pasteur during the anti-rabies campaign (autumn 1889), interim President of the British Institute of Preventive Medicine (1893-1896), and immunology researcher (1890-1895), in London and Paris, under the guidance of Élie Metchnikoff (1845-1916). Ruffer developed the diphtheria antitoxin in Britain. In addition to a dissertation on hydrocephalus, he composed or co-authored 34 papers. A prolific writer, linguist, clinician, and administrator, he explored several medical sub-disciplines before concentrating on palaeopathology.


Asunto(s)
Alergia e Inmunología/historia , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/historia , Antitoxina Diftérica/historia , Medicina Preventiva/historia , Rabia/historia , Inglaterra , Historia del Siglo XIX , Hidrocefalia/historia , Londres , Paleopatología/historia , Paris
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): e2799-e2806, 2021 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32818967

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Respiratory diphtheria is a toxin-mediated disease caused by Corynebacterium diphtheriae. Diphtheria-like illness, clinically indistinguishable from diphtheria, is caused by Corynebacterium ulcerans, a zoonotic bacterium that can also produce diphtheria toxin. In the United States, respiratory diphtheria is nationally notifiable: specimens from suspected cases are submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for species and toxin confirmation, and diphtheria antitoxin (DAT) is obtained from CDC for treatment. We summarize the epidemiology of respiratory diphtheria and diphtheria-like illness and describe DAT use during 1996-2018 in the United States. METHODS: We described respiratory diphtheria cases reported to the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NNDSS) and C. ulcerans-related diphtheria-like illness identified through specimen submissions to CDC during 1996-2018. We reviewed DAT requests from 1997 to 2018. RESULTS: From 1996 to 2018, 14 respiratory diphtheria cases were reported to NNDSS. Among these 14 cases, 1 was toxigenic and 3 were nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae by culture and Elek, 6 were culture-negative but polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive for diphtheria toxin gene, 1 was culture-positive without further testing, and the remaining 3 were either not tested or tested negative. Five cases of respiratory diphtheria-like illness caused by toxigenic C. ulcerans were identified. DAT was requested by healthcare providers for 151 suspected diphtheria cases between 1997 and 2018, with an average of 11 requests per year from 1997 to 2007, and 3 per year from 2008 to 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory diphtheria remains rare in the United States, and requests for DAT have declined. Incidental identification of C. ulcerans-related diphtheria-like illness suggests surveillance of this condition might be warranted.


Asunto(s)
Corynebacterium diphtheriae , Difteria , Corynebacterium , Difteria/tratamiento farmacológico , Difteria/epidemiología , Antitoxina Diftérica , Toxina Diftérica , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
11.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(7): e1713-e1718, 2021 10 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33245364

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diphtheria has re-emerged over the past several years. There is a paucity of data on the administration and safety of diphtheria antitoxin (DAT), the standard treatment for diphtheria. The 2017-2018 outbreak among Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh was the largest in decades. We determined the outcomes of DAT-treated patients and describe the occurrence and risk factors associated with adverse reactions to DAT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study at the Médecins Sans Frontières Rubber Garden Diphtheria Treatment Center from December 2017-September 2018. Diphtheria was diagnosed based on the World Health Organization clinical case criteria. High-acuity patients were eligible for DAT. Safety precautions were meticulously maintained. We calculated the presence of adverse events by age, duration of illness, and DAT dosage using bivariate comparisons. RESULTS: We treated 709 patients with DAT; 98% (n = 696) recovered and were discharged. One-fourth (n = 170) had at least 1 adverse reaction. Common reactions included cough (n = 115, 16%), rash (n = 66, 9%), and itching (n = 37, 5%). Three percent (n = 18) had severe hypersensitivity reactions. Five patients died during their DAT infusion or soon afterwards, but no deaths were attributed to DAT. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes for DAT-treated patients were excellent; mortality was <1%. Adverse reactions occurred in one-quarter of all patients, but most reactions were mild and resolved quickly. DAT can be safely administered in a setting with basic critical care, provided there is continuous patient monitoring during the infusion, staff training on management of adverse effects, and attention to safety precautions.


Asunto(s)
Antitoxina Diftérica , Difteria , Bangladesh/epidemiología , Difteria/tratamiento farmacológico , Difteria/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
Int J Infect Dis ; 104: 85-91, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33359066

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the development and status quo of the quality of high throughput in vitro diagnostic testing for tetanus and diphtheria antitoxin antibody (ATX) concentrations based on external quality assessment (EQA) data. METHODS: We analyzed manufacturer-specific data of 22 EQA surveys-each for the detection of tetanus and diphtheria ATX-to check the diagnostic strength of the corresponding in vitro diagnostic systems. RESULTS: While the results were mostly well aligned, individual surveys showed widely dispersed ATX concentrations. The medians of manufacturer collectives deviated from the overall median by up to 8.9-fold in the case of diphtheria ATX and by up to 3.5-fold in the case of tetanus ATX. Such a distribution in the results is particularly critical in the cut-off range for immunity and may lead to an incorrect assessment of vaccination status. CONCLUSION: These results were surprising as there are International Standards for both ATX; however, the results may be linked to the high ATX concentration of the reference material, which deviates considerably from clinically significant concentrations. To increase the accuracy and diagnostic strength of both assays, we recommend a recalibration of the test systems and verification of their traceability to the International Standards.


Asunto(s)
Antitoxina Diftérica/sangre , Antitoxina Tetánica/sangre , Difteria/inmunología , Humanos , Técnicas Inmunológicas/normas , Ensayos de Aptitud de Laboratorios , Tétanos/inmunología
13.
Microbiol Immunol ; 64(9): 610-619, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32662896

RESUMEN

Type I IFNs are a range of host-derived molecules with adjuvant potential; they have been used for many years in the treatment of cancer and viral hepatitis. Therefore, the safety of IFNs for human use has been established. In this study, we evaluated the mucosal adjuvanticity of IFN-ß administered intranasally to mice with diphtheria toxoid, and suggested a method to improve its adjuvanticity. When IFN-ß alone was used as a mucosal adjuvant, no clear results were obtained. However, simultaneous administration of IFN-ß and chitosan resulted in an enhancement of the specific serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibody responses, the mucosal IgA antibody response, and antitoxin titers. Furthermore, the intranasal administration of IFN-α alone resulted in a greater increase in antibody titer than IFN-ß, and a synergistic effect with chitosan was also observed. These findings suggest that intranasal administration of chitosan and Type I IFNs may display an effective synergistic mucosal adjuvant activity.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Formación de Anticuerpos , Quitosano/administración & dosificación , Toxoide Diftérico/inmunología , Interferón Tipo I/administración & dosificación , Mucosa Nasal/inmunología , Administración Intranasal , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Quitosano/inmunología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Difteria/inmunología , Difteria/prevención & control , Antitoxina Diftérica/sangre , Antitoxina Diftérica/inmunología , Toxoide Diftérico/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunidad Mucosa , Inmunoglobulina A/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Interferón Tipo I/inmunología , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Bazo/inmunología
15.
Vaccine ; 38(9): 2128-2131, 2020 02 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31987691

RESUMEN

To evaluate seroprotection of different dosing strategies of reduced-diphtheria-tetanus-toxoid vaccine (Td) for adults during a diphtheria outbreak in Thailand, we enrolled 160 healthcare workers and 161 adults aged 20-60 years old and measured diphtheria antitoxin (DAT) level before administration of a Td vaccine. We scheduled a second Td at 4-8 weeks and a third Td at 6-12 months interval. DAT was measured 4 weeks after each dose. DAT levels of ≥0.1 and ≥1 IU/mL were considered as seroprotective and long-term seroprotective. Persons achieving long-term seroprotection were not given a further dose. The baseline seroprotection rate was 32.6%, which increased to 87.1% (95% confidence interval, 83.4-90.8%) after one dose. The seroprotection rate increased slightly with additional doses. The immune response was lowest among persons 30-49 years of age. We suggest 1-dose Td for adults during a diphtheria outbreak, and a 2-dose series being considered for those born before 1980.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra Difteria y Tétanos/uso terapéutico , Difteria , Personal de Salud , Inmunización Secundaria , Tétanos , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Difteria/epidemiología , Difteria/prevención & control , Antitoxina Diftérica/sangre , Toxoide Diftérico/administración & dosificación , Vacuna contra Difteria y Tétanos/administración & dosificación , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tétanos/epidemiología , Tétanos/prevención & control , Toxoide Tetánico/administración & dosificación , Tailandia , Adulto Joven
16.
Nat Rev Dis Primers ; 5(1): 81, 2019 12 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31804499

RESUMEN

Diphtheria is a potentially fatal infection mostly caused by toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae strains and occasionally by toxigenic C. ulcerans and C. pseudotuberculosis strains. Diphtheria is generally an acute respiratory infection, characterized by the formation of a pseudomembrane in the throat, but cutaneous infections are possible. Systemic effects, such as myocarditis and neuropathy, which are associated with increased fatality risk, are due to diphtheria toxin, an exotoxin produced by the pathogen that inhibits protein synthesis and causes cell death. Clinical diagnosis is confirmed by the isolation and identification of the causative Corynebacterium spp., usually by bacterial culture followed by enzymatic and toxin detection tests. Diphtheria can be treated with the timely administration of diphtheria antitoxin and antimicrobial therapy. Although effective vaccines are available, this disease has the potential to re-emerge in countries where the recommended vaccination programmes are not sustained, and increasing proportions of adults are becoming susceptible to diphtheria. Thousands of diphtheria cases are still reported annually from several countries in Asia and Africa, along with many outbreaks. Changes in the epidemiology of diphtheria have been reported worldwide. The prevalence of toxigenic Corynebacterium spp. highlights the need for proper clinical and epidemiological investigations to quickly identify and treat affected individuals, along with public health measures to prevent and contain the spread of this disease.


Asunto(s)
Antitoxina Diftérica/uso terapéutico , Difteria/diagnóstico , Difteria/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Corynebacterium/efectos de los fármacos , Corynebacterium/patogenicidad , Difteria/epidemiología , Humanos , Vacunación/métodos
18.
BMJ Case Rep ; 12(11)2019 Nov 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31678926

RESUMEN

A 65-year-old male patient presented with fever, fast atrial fibrillation and frank haematuria on return to Ireland from travel in East Africa. He had a systolic murmur leading to a clinical suspicion of endocarditis. He had no specific clinical features of diphtheria. Blood cultures were taken and empiric therapy commenced with benzylpenicillin, vancomycin and gentamicin. Corynebacterium diphtheriae was detected on blood culture. The isolate was submitted to a reference laboratory for evaluation of toxigenicity. While initially there was concern regarding the possibility of myocarditis, a clinical decision was made not to administer diphtheria antitoxin in the absence of clinical features of respiratory diphtheria, in the presence of invasive infection and with presumptive previous immunisation. There is no specific guidance on the role of antitoxin in this setting. The issue is not generally addressed in previous reports of C. diphtheriae blood stream infection.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Corynebacterium/sangre , Corynebacterium diphtheriae/aislamiento & purificación , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Ceftriaxona/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Corynebacterium/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Corynebacterium/microbiología , Antitoxina Diftérica/uso terapéutico , Úlcera del Pie/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/complicaciones , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/microbiología , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía
19.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1632019 10 10.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31609562

RESUMEN

Respiratory diphtheria is an acute respiratory tract infection. The high mortality rates (5-10%) are related to airway obstruction and local and systemic effects of the diphtheria toxin. Vaccination against diphtheria has been available through the Dutch national vaccination programme since the 1950s. The disease has now become rare as a result of herd immunity by these vaccinations. As a consequence, the disease has largely been forgotten, which can result in it not being recognised and treated in time. In addition, diphtheria antitoxin is not always available. In this article, we are drawing attention to the need for immunisation. We also look back at how diphtheria prevention started in the Netherlands.


Asunto(s)
Antitoxina Diftérica/inmunología , Toxoide Diftérico/inmunología , Difteria/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunización , Programas de Inmunización , Países Bajos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/inmunología
20.
J Trop Pediatr ; 65(2): 183-187, 2019 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29688558

RESUMEN

Infection with Corynebacterium diphtheriae persists in Haiti. Twenty-six children with clinically severe respiratory diphtheria presented to a hospital in northern Haiti during a 3-year period beginning in early 2015. The mortality rate was 50%. Partial or absent vaccinations as well as delayed and limited care contributed to mortality. This cohort offer insights into the multiple challenges involved in preventing and caring for children with diphtheria in resource-limited settings.


Asunto(s)
Corynebacterium diphtheriae/aislamiento & purificación , Difteria/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/complicaciones , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/microbiología , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Diagnóstico Tardío , Difteria/tratamiento farmacológico , Difteria/microbiología , Difteria/mortalidad , Antitoxina Diftérica/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Haití/epidemiología , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Inmunización , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...