RESUMEN
Developing political engagement among nurses who care for rural and underserved communities can help mitigate health inequities. An experiential learning opportunity informed by Lobby Day was developed to prepare primary care advanced practice nursing students with the policy skills needed to actively serve as advocates for their patients and communities.
Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Humanos , Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada/organización & administración , Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada/educación , Estudiantes de Enfermería/psicología , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , PolíticaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: The purposes of this educational activity were to instill in students a greater empathy for patients with intellectual developmental disabilities, give students a better understanding of how to obtain a medical history for patients with communication limitations, teach students practical tips for obtaining a medical history and physical examination to increase competence in their future practice, and to build a relationship with a local organization that serves people with intellectual disabilities. An experiential learning activity was added to the curriculum of two courses for first-year PA students to accomplish these goals. The course instructors engaged in several planning meetings with a local residential facility for people with intellectual disabilities, including choosing patients that the students would assess. The students made 3 visits to the facility. The visits included interactive lectures by a physical therapist, occupational therapist, nurse practitioner, medical doctor, and dentist. Two of the facility involved patient visits at designated homes on campus. The students then wrote comprehensive visit notes with patient identifying information removed and submitted them for grading. Students expressed feeling better prepared to assess people with intellectual disabilities and having an increased appreciation for obtaining quality medical histories. The partner facility also reported they received positive feedback from staff participants and indicated they would like to continue this partnership.
Asunto(s)
Discapacidades del Desarrollo , Discapacidad Intelectual , Asistentes Médicos , Humanos , Asistentes Médicos/educación , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/terapia , Competencia Clínica , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Anamnesis , Empatía , Curriculum , Examen Físico/normasRESUMEN
Objectives: The changing global landscape of disease and public health crises, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, call for a new generation of global health leaders. As global health leadership programs evolve, many have incorporated experiential learning and mentoring (ELM) components into their structure. However, there has been incomplete consideration on how ELM activities are deployed, what challenges they face and how programs adapt to meet those challenges. This paper builds on the co-authors' experiences as trainees, trainers, organizers and evaluators of six global health leadership programs to reflect on lessons learned regarding ELM. We also consider ethics, technology, gender, age and framing that influence how ELM activities are developed and implemented. Findings: Despite the diverse origins and funding of these programs, all six are focused on training participants from low- and middle-income countries drawing on a diversity of professions. Each program uses mixed didactic approaches, practice-based placements, competency and skills-driven curricula, and mentorship via various modalities. Main metrics for success include development of trainee networks, acquisition of skills and formation of relationships; programs that included research training had specific research metrics as well. Common challenges the programs face include ensuring clarity of expectations of all participants and mentors; maintaining connection among trainees; meeting the needs of trainee cohorts with different skill sets and starting points; and ensuring trainee cohorts capture age, gender and other forms of diversity. Conclusions: ELM activities for global health leadership are proving even more critical now as the importance of effective individual leaders in responding to crises becomes evident. Future efforts for ELM in global health leadership should emphasize local adaptation and sustainability. Practice-based learning and established mentoring relationships provide the building blocks for competent leaders to navigate complex dynamics with the flexibility and conscientiousness needed to improve the health of global populations. Key Takeaways: Experiential learning and mentorship activities within global health leadership programs provide the hands-on practice and support that the next generation of global health leaders need to address the health challenges of our times.Six global health leadership programs with experiential learning and mentorship components are showcased to highlight differences and similarities in their approaches and capture a broad picture of achievements that can help inform future programs.Emphasis on inter-professional training, mixed-learning approaches and mentorship modalities were common across programs. Both individual capacity building and development of trainees' professional networks were seen as critical, reflecting the value of inter-personal connections for long-term leadership success.During program design, future programs should recognize the "frame" within which the program will be incorporated and intentionally address diversity-in all its forms-during recruitment as well as consider North-South ethics, leadership roles, hierarchies and transition plans.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Salud Global/educación , Liderazgo , Tutoría/métodos , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/métodos , Competencia Clínica , Países en Desarrollo , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Tutoría/organización & administración , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Desarrollo de Programa/métodosRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic caused substantial disruptions in medical education. The University of British Columbia (UBC) MD Undergraduate Program (MDUP) is the sixth-largest medical school in North America. MDUP students and faculty developed a joint response to these disruptions to address the curriculum and public health challenges that the pandemic posed. After clinical activities were suspended in March 2020, third- and fourth-year MDUP students formed a COVID-19 Medical Student Response Team (MSRT) to support frontline physicians, public health agencies, and community members affected by the pandemic. A nimble organizational structure was developed across 4 UBC campuses to ensure a rapid response to meet physician and community needs. Support from the faculty ensured the activities were safe for the public, patients, and students and facilitated the provision of curricular credit for volunteer activities meeting academic criteria. As of June 19, 2020, more than 700 medical students had signed up to participate in 68 projects. The majority of students participated in projects supporting the health care system, including performing contact tracing, staffing public COVID-19 call centers, distributing personal protective equipment, and creating educational multimedia products. Many initiatives have been integrated into the MDUP curriculum as scholarly activities or paraclinical electives for which academic credit is awarded. This was made possible by the inherent flexibility of the MDUP curriculum and a strong existing partnership between students and faculty. Through this process, medical students were able to develop fundamental leadership, advocacy, communication, and collaboration skills, essential competencies for graduating physicians. In developing a transparent, accountable, and inclusive organization, students were able to effectively meet community needs during a crisis and create a sustainable and democratic structure capable of responding to future emergencies. Open dialogue between the MSRT and the faculty allowed for collaborative problem solving and the opportunity to transform disruption into academic innovation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Universidades/organización & administración , Colombia Británica , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Colaboración Intersectorial , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/métodos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the first attempt neonatal intubation success rates of pediatric trainees following the implementation of an evidence-based training package. STUDY DESIGN: Data collection was undertaken from February, 1 2017, to January 31, 2018, to ascertain baseline preimplementation intubation success rates. An intubation training package, which included the use of videolaryngoscopy, preprocedure pause, and standardized instruction during the procedure, was introduced. Data on all subsequent intubations were collected prospectively from May 1, 2018, to April 30, 2020. RESULTS: Preimplementation baseline data over a 1-year period demonstrated overall first attempt intubation success rate of junior trainees to be 37% (33/89). After implementation of the training package, 290 intubations were analyzed over a 2-year period. The overall success rate was 67% (194/290); 61% (117/192) for junior trainees and 79% (77/98) for senior clinicians. Three or more attempts were required for 13% of intubations (38/290). During the study period, the overall number of intubations being carried out decreased. Intubations with the videolaryngoscope had higher success rates for all tiers of clinician, most marked in the junior tiers. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a standardized intubation training package, along with videolaryngoscopy, improved trainee intubation success rates.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Cuidados Críticos , Intubación Intratraqueal , Laringoscopía/educación , Pediatría/educación , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Internado y Residencia , Grabación en VideoRESUMEN
Introduction: In summer term 2020, the clinical phase of the undergraduate medical curriculum at University Medical Center Göttingen was restructured since distance teaching had to be used predominantly due to contact restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper investigates the impact of restructuring the clinical curriculum on medical students' satisfaction and learning outcomes. Methods: In each cohort, the 13-week curriculum was divided into two parts: During the first 9 weeks, factual knowledge was imparted using distance teaching by means of a modified inverted classroom approach. This was followed by a 4-week period of adapted classroom teaching involving both real and virtual patients in order to train students' practical skills. The evaluation of the 21 clinical modules comprised students' satisfaction with distance teaching as well as students' learning outcome. The latter was assessed by means of comparative self-assessment (CSA) gain and the results of the module exams, respectively. Data of summer term 2020 (= distance teaching, DT) were compared with respective data of winter term 2019/20 (= classroom teaching, CT) and analysed for differences and correlations. Results: Response rates of evaluations were 51.3% in CT and 19.3% in DT. There was no significant difference between mean scores in module exams in CT and DT, respectively. However, CSA gain was significantly lower in DT (p=0.047) compared with CT. Further analyses revealed that CSA gain depended on the time point of data collection: CSA gain was lower the more time had passed since the end of a specific module. Moreover, we found positive correlations between CSA gain and students' satisfaction with various aspects of distance teaching, particularly with "communication between teachers and students" (rho=0.674; p=0.002). Discussion and conclusions: Although some limitations and confounding factors have to be taken into account (such as evaluation response rates, assessment time points, and proportion of familiar items in module exams), the following recommendations can be derived from our findings: A valid assessment of students' learning outcome by means of exam results requires that as few exam items as possible are familiar to the students. CSA gain seems to be valid if assessment time points are standardised and not contaminated by students' learning activities for other modules. Good communication between teachers and students may contribute to increase students' satisfaction with distance teaching.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , COVID-19/epidemiología , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Satisfacción Personal , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Competencia Clínica , Comunicación , Curriculum , Educación a Distancia , Evaluación Educacional/métodos , Evaluación Educacional/normas , Humanos , Pandemias , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2 , Realidad VirtualRESUMEN
Introduction: In 2014, a newly designed, case-based seminar was successfully implemented in the subjects of health systems, health economics and public health care (GGG). The seminar "The Lonely Patient" is based on a real patient case and deals with the German health care system from the perspective of a patient. In order to create more space for discussion and exchange among students, the seminar was redesigned on the basis of the Inverted Classroom Method (ICM). Project description: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, new, purely digital teaching formats had to be developed quickly in the sense of Emergency Remote Teaching. Therefore, the Inverted Classroom concept of the seminar was transformed into an online ICM. In order to promote active learning based on the ICAP model (Interactive, Constructive, Active, Passive), the online face-to-face part was designed as a synchronous interactive learner-centered course using the gamified audience response system Kahoot! Results: Evaluation results to date and feedback rounds with students indicate that the online ICM-version of the seminar leads to at least as good evaluation results as the previous face-to-face course. In particular, the students positively emphasize the use of Kahoot! as an activating digital medium. Discussion: Through the use of the ICM and the gamified audience response system Kahoot!, students could be activated in meaningful ways. The resulting discussions about the patient case and teaching content of the quiz questions in the synchronous online course could be implemented just as well as in the classroom-based course of previous semesters. Conclusion: The application of the online ICM, along with the consideration of the ICAP Model, has led to the successful implementation of a digital course within the context of the increased difficulty surrounding the emergency remote teaching. Additionally, students' learning success has remained at a similar level as during traditional classroom-based courses of previous semesters.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Educación a Distancia/organización & administración , Educación Médica/organización & administración , Grupo Paritario , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Enseñanza/organización & administración , Humanos , Motivación , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
PROBLEM: In an ideal learning health care system (LHS), clinicians learn from what they do and do what they learn, closing the evidence-to-practice gap. In operationalizing an LHS, great strides have been made in knowledge generation. Yet, considerable challenges remain to the broad uptake of identified best practices. To bridge the gap from generating actionable knowledge to applying that knowledge in clinical practice, and ultimately to improving outcomes, new information must be disseminated to and implemented by frontline clinicians. To date, the dissemination of this knowledge through traditional avenues has not achieved meaningful practice change quickly. APPROACH: Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) developed QuizTime, a smartphone application learning platform, to provide a mechanism for embedding workplace-based clinician learning in the LHS. QuizTime leverages spaced education and retrieval-based practice to facilitate practice change. Beginning in January 2020, clinician-researchers and educators at VUMC designed a randomized, controlled trial to test whether the QuizTime learning system influenced clinician behavior in the context of recent evidence supporting the use of balanced crystalloids rather than saline for intravenous fluid management and new regulations around opioid prescribing. OUTCOMES: Whether spaced education and retrieval-based practice influence clinician behavior and patient outcomes at the VUMC system level will be tested using the data currently being collected. NEXT STEPS: These findings will inform future directions for developing and deploying learning approaches at scale in an LHS, with the goal of closing the evidence-to-practice gap.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Aprendizaje del Sistema de Salud/métodos , Aplicaciones Móviles , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Difusión de Innovaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Gestión del Conocimiento , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Tennessee , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/educaciónRESUMEN
Different models of learning health systems are emerging. At Vanderbilt University Medical Center, the Learning Health Care System (LHS) Platform was established with the goal of creating generalizable knowledge. This differentiates the LHS Platform from other efforts that have adopted a quality improvement paradigm. By supporting pragmatic trials at the intersection of research, operations, and clinical care, the LHS Platform was designed to yield evidence for advancing content and processes of care through carefully designed, rigorous study. The LHS Platform provides the necessary infrastructure and governance to leverage translational, transdisciplinary team science to inform clinical and operational decision making across the health system. The process transforms a clinical or operational question into a research question amenable to a pragmatic trial. Scientific, technical, procedural, and human infrastructure is maintained for the design and execution of individual LHS projects. This includes experienced pragmatic trialists, project management, data science inclusive of biostatistics and clinical informatics, and regulatory support. Careful attention is paid to stakeholder engagement, including health care providers and the community. Capturing lessons from each new study, the LHS Platform continues to mature with plans to integrate implementation science and to complement clinical and process outcomes with cost and value considerations. The Vanderbilt University Medical Center LHS Platform is now a pillar of the health care system and leads the evolving culture of learning from what we do and doing what we learn.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Aprendizaje del Sistema de Salud/métodos , Modelos Organizacionales , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Pragmáticos como Asunto , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , TennesseeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Over the last decade, the use of technology-enhanced learning (TEL) has rapidly expanded and diversified. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a growing demand for distance and online learning strategies to support and even replace learning experiences previously afforded by clinical placements and clerkships. An intriguing but under-researched modality is the use of medical reality television to provide authentic experiences of patient care. This strategy does not feature in published medical educational literature, though promising research is emerging from other disciplines. METHODOLOGY: A programme of learning using medical reality television clips to facilitate case-based learning was developed according to the principles of 'anchored instruction', a technology-based educational theory. Clips were taken from the UK television show '24 hours in A&E'. Medical students' learning experiences were investigated using a qualitative approach addressing the following research questions: - What is the perceived emotional experience of medical students when watching reality television in an educational context? - How do medical students relate their experience of watching reality television in a formal educational setting to their perceived learning needs in the clinical environment? A case study research methodology was adopted within the interpretivist paradigm. Data were triangulated from semi-structured interviews with students and non-participant observation of the teaching session. Field notes and transcripts were analysed through an inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: In response to the medical reality television, a diverse range of emotions were expressed including: excitement, amusement, concern, nervousness, sadness and joy. Students identified gaps in their clinical knowledge such as interpreting results, practical aspects of prescribing and end of life care. Key themes were increased student engagement and a promotion of holistic care practices. DISCUSSION: Students perceived reality television as a highly realistic and relatable medium and an enjoyable, memorable way to contextualise learning from the classroom to real life, a finding mirrored in previous studies in other fields. The high degree of emotion expressed may explain the improved subjective memorability of the cases. CONCLUSION: Medical reality television offers a unique means of engaging students by providing authentic experiences of patient care and should be valued alongside other technology-enhanced learning strategies.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Educación a Distancia/organización & administración , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Televisión , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Atención al Paciente , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Teaching by way of asking questions is a time-honored practice that has taken on the negative connotation of "pimping" among medical students and has made some faculty hesitant to ask students questions during clerkship rotations. Yet, quantitative studies exploring student perspectives on this practice are limited. This study aimed to solicit student and faculty views and investigate faculty perceptions of students' preferences. METHOD: Students who completed their internal medicine clerkship during the 2017-2018 academic year (n = 165) and were from the 2020 graduating class and their supervising faculty (n = 144) at the University of Michigan Medical School were asked to complete a Likert response survey in April 2019. The survey solicited perspectives on questions probing medical knowledge posed to students by faculty. Surveys were constructed using an iterative process, and data were analyzed using t tests and linear regressions. RESULTS: A total of 140 (85%) students and 112 (78%) faculty participated. Of those, 125 (89%) students and 109 (97%) faculty agreed that probing questions are valuable for student education, but only 73 (65%) faculty perceived that students agreed with this statement (P < .001). In addition, 115 (82%) students preferred to be asked too many questions than none at all. Fifty-five (39%) students agreed that they feel humiliated when they answer a question incorrectly. However, only 7 (5%) students agreed that faculty ask questions to humiliate them, and only 20 (14%) preferred that faculty stop asking questions if they answer a question incorrectly. CONCLUSIONS: Students valued probing questions more than faculty perceived, which argues against a withdrawal from the Socratic teaching method in the clinical arena. The students' experience of humiliation when answering incorrectly requires further study and perhaps can be tempered by more explicit framing of the role of the questioning process.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Docentes/psicología , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Filosofía Médica , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In recent months, the coronavirus pandemic has significantly affected almost every industry in the United States, including health care and higher education. Faculty and students at colleges and schools of pharmacy nationwide have needed to quickly adapt as the delivery of curricula has shifted to primarily online format. Additionally, experiential rotations have been significantly affected as practice settings such as hospitals and outpatient clinics have limited students' interactions with patients or stopped allowing students on-site altogether. Our commentary will explore strategies that have been employed by experiential education coordinators and pharmacy preceptors from various settings to navigate experiential education during these difficult times while ensuring students successfully meet requirements for graduation. These will include descriptions of transitioning advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) to virtual format, how to safely involve students in the care of COVID-19 patients, and managing scheduling issues.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Educación a Distancia/organización & administración , Educación en Farmacia/organización & administración , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Humanos , Preceptoría/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Problem-based learning (PBL) sessions have become common alternatives to traditional didactic-style sessions in medical education, including within pediatric education. The creation and execution of PBL sessions, however, can vary among institutions and even between educators at a given institution. Coupling the personal experiences of a recently-graduated medical student with that of a knowledgeable medical educator, the authors sought to analyze two PBL session experiences of the medical student during her second year with the goal of pinpointing specific elements that add value for both learners and facilitators. RECENT FINDINGS: Through this analysis, the authors propose enhancements to PBL sessions that may make them more optimal for developing knowledge in pediatric medicine. These include utilizing an interactive video of the clinical problem to more uniformly assess the learner's knowledge gaps, supporting the creation and evolution of peer-to-peer learning communities, and helping to educate facilitators in how to guide dialogue in this type of educational setting. SUMMARY: The PBL enhancements identified by the authors provide educators with innovative suggestions to better engage pediatric trainees in building social capital, acquiring knowledge, and helping learners retain that knowledge beyond their assessments.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Educación Médica , Pediatría , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas , Estudiantes de Medicina , Educación Médica/organización & administración , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Humanos , Pediatría/educación , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicologíaRESUMEN
Global health trainees rely on immersive experiences to apply their classroom knowledge in real-world settings. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic travel has come to a halt and short-term experiences are no longer available in their current form. As with didactic material, global health programs have an opportunity to innovate the delivery of applied learning, providing trainees with robust, mentored experiences that promote the acquisition of core global health competencies. We provide a series of practical solutions for remote applied learning including case-based learning, pathfinder pedagogy, virtual reality simulations, and twinning. We further describe the role of these approaches in addressing common criticisms of short-term experiences and their potential for creating new win-win dynamics between institutions and trainees.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus , Educación a Distancia , Salud Global/educación , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas , Enseñanza/tendencias , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Educación/organización & administración , Educación a Distancia/métodos , Educación a Distancia/organización & administración , Humanos , Innovación Organizacional , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/métodos , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
AIMS: The purpose of this study was to explore the changes in clinical reasoning, self-efficacy, and critical thinking of a group of Doctor of Physical (DPT) students who completed a high and low dose of pediatric experiential learning (EL) as a component of their semester-long pediatric course. METHODS: A convenience sample of students at two DPT programs in the United States were recruited. A pre-test post-test comparison group design was used to examine the change in students' clinical reasoning, self-efficacy, and critical thinking following completion of a pediatric course that contained a high or low dose of EL. Students completed the Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and Reasoning, Physical Therapy Self-Efficacy Scale, and Health Science Reasoning Test during the first and last weeks of the semester. Students in the high-dose group reported a significant increase (p=0.000) over time in self-perceived clinical reasoning and self-efficacy. Overall critical thinking abilities significantly improved (p=0.044) over time in both groups. CONCLUSION: A high dose of pediatric EL seems to aid students in the development of self-perceived clinical reasoning and self-efficacy. Providing students with EL opportunities prior to pediatric rotations may help to bolster these important skills, leading to improved clinical performance.
Asunto(s)
Razonamiento Clínico , Educación de Postgrado/organización & administración , Pediatría/educación , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/educación , Autoeficacia , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Solución de Problemas , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This pilot study investigated the level of cognition that physician assistant (PA) students achieved through adoption of an innovative blended learning model that connects the classroom, clinicians, and community clinics through electronic-learning (e-learning) technologies (C4Tech) used in a PA course. This education intervention aimed to facilitate authentic learning collaborations between PA students and practicing clinicians that would result in higher-order cognition related to the manifestations of social determinants of health and health disparities. METHODS: A case study approach was adopted to assess levels of cognition and changes in those levels resulting from application of an innovative blended learning model. Content analysis using Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive domains facilitated determination levels of cognition and changes in those levels. The sample of 8 groups comprised 70 PA students and 8 clinical instructors from community clinics with underrepresented patient populations. RESULTS: Analysis of 2 course assignments revealed that application of the C4Tech model yields high levels of cognition. By the course's end, all 8 groups achieved at least the "evaluate" level of cognition and half of the groups achieved the highest level of cognition, the "create" level. A wide variation in the level of cognition was demonstrated between the first and second assignments in each group and among groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that e-learning technologies can be effective in blending classrooms and work environments for authentic and collaborative learning. Adoption of the C4Tech model yielded higher-order cognition related to course content.
Asunto(s)
Asistentes Médicos/educación , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Prácticas Clínicas/organización & administración , Cognición , Conducta Cooperativa , Curriculum , Tecnología Educacional/organización & administración , Humanos , Aprendizaje , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
The pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus identified in 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in seismic changes throughout society. Accordingly, academia has been forced to adapt. Changes across all aspects of teaching and instruction have occurred. Students have departed campuses and prospects of their return remain unclear. The Academy, which is generally reluctant to change, has been forced to make rapid adjustments. Among other issues, pharmacy schools and colleges have been forced to mitigate changes to experiential education. Tremendous resources and energy have been invested to actuate the changes that have occurred. In many ways, the disruptions forced upon pharmacy education may usher in a new normal. The likelihood for even a partial return to the customary way of doing things appears increasingly unlikely.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Educación en Farmacia/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Facultades de Farmacia/organización & administración , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
The coronavirus identified in 2019 (COVID-19) has caused dramatic disruptions in pharmacy experiential education. Administrators and programs have worked to help external preceptors, faculty members, and students cope with the new realities of virtual or remote experiences and new or increased use of telemedicine. Clear and effective lines of communication as well as well-reasoned and resourced alternative plans are necessary to help manage the current issues and prepare for future challenges. Doctor of Pharmacy programs should enhance their focus not just on the physical health and well-being of students, faculty members, and external preceptors, but also on their mental and emotional health. The full scope of the impact of the pandemic on experiential education in pharmacy is still unclear, but this situation should serve as a stimulus for innovation and rethinking the paradigm of how pharmacy programs educate and prepare students for pharmacy practice.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Educación en Farmacia/organización & administración , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/organización & administración , Facultades de Farmacia/organización & administración , Adaptación Psicológica , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Comunicación , Educación a Distancia/organización & administración , Docentes de Farmacia/psicología , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudiantes de Farmacia/psicología , Comunicación por VideoconferenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In an ageing society, community-based medical education in a home care setting needs to be developed. Drawing on Kolb's experiential learning theory, this study aimed to explore the learning processes in overnight home care by medical trainees in terms of their understanding of terminally ill patients and their conceptualization of themselves as future physicians. METHODS: An overnight home care program in which a trainee had to take care of terminally ill patients on his/her own under the supervision of a healthcare team was conducted. Nineteen trainees, including eight medical students and 11 residents, participated in this study. Text data of reflective reports written after the overnight care were collected and thematically analyzed. RESULTS: The trainees' learning experiences in the program were categorized into four stages: predeparture, concrete experience, reflective observation and abstract conceptualization. Although they had mixed feelings, including anxiety, fear and expectations, at the predeparture stage, they could be actively involved in providing medical care and daily life support and in taking care of dying patients at the patients' homes overnight. By reflecting on their experiences, they gained a sense of achievement and identified the aspects upon which they should improve as future physicians. Subsequently, based on their reflective observation, they conceptualized their approaches to home care and the roles/responsibilities of physicians as healers, which led to professional identity formation. CONCLUSIONS: Overnight home care by medical trainees has the potential as an educational strategy to promote their realistic understanding of home care and facilitate professional identity formation.