Upper- vs Lower-Extremity Secondary Access During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: An upper-extremity approach for secondary access during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) may reduce clinically relevant secondary access site-related bleeding. Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of an upper-extremity approach compared with a lower-extremity approach in patients undergoing TAVI. Design, Setting, and Participants: The TAVI XS trial was a randomized clinical trial performed between November 28, 2022, and November 15, 2023, with a 30-day follow-up, in 4 TAVI centers in the Netherlands. Eligibility was determined first, and only those patients with severe aortic stenosis and no contraindication for upper- or lower-extremity secondary access were informed about the study and asked to participate. Intervention: Participants were randomized 1:1 between the upper-extremity approach (radial artery diagnostic access and upper-arm vein for temporary pacing lead placement) and lower-extremity approach (femoral artery diagnostic access and femoral vein for temporary pacing lead placement) for secondary access during TAVI. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end point was clinically relevant bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2, 3, or 5) of the randomized secondary access. Secondary end points included any clinically relevant bleeding, time to mobilization, duration of hospitalization, secondary access failure, and procedural time. Results: Of a total of 324 eligible patients, 238 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI (mean [SD] age, 79.4 [6.5] years; 150 male [63.0%]; median European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II score, 2.2% [IQR, 1.5%-3.5%]) were included. The primary end point occurred in 5 of 119 patients (4.2%) in the upper-extremity group and 16 of 119 (13.4%) in the lower-extremity group (odds ratio [OR], 0.28 [95% CI, 0.10-0.80]; P = .01). Incidence of any clinically relevant bleeding was decreased in the upper-extremity group (25 of 119 [21.0%] vs 41 of 119 [34.5%] patients; OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28-0.91]; P = .02). There was no difference in time to mobilization or duration of hospitalization. Secondary access failure (14 of 119 [11.8%] vs 1 of 119 [0.8%] patients; OR, 15.73 [95% CI, 2.03-121.69]; P = .001) and procedural time (60.0 [IQR, 39.0-88.0; 95% CI, 53.0-70.0] vs 48.0 [IQR, 34.0-64.0; 95% CI, 40.0-55.0] minutes; P = .002) were higher in the upper-extremity cohort. Conclusion and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI, the upper-extremity approach for secondary access was associated with less clinically relevant access site-related bleeding compared with the conventional lower-extremity approach and should be considered to reduce periprocedural bleeding complications. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05672823.

Making Neuroendovascular Therapy for Cerebrovascular Disease Using Distal/Trans-radial Artery Access Safer.

Neuroendovascular therapy using distal/trans-radial artery access (d/TRA) has attracted attention as a less invasive procedure. We have selected dTRA or TRA in all cases of carotid artery stenting (CAS). In recent years, TRA has been actively selected for mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke (MT for AIS) and Onyx embolisation for arteriovenous malformations. We compared the patient background, surgical strategy, perioperative complications, and outcome in 41 patients who underwent CAS in the first period (Apr 2017-Feb 2019) and 12 patients in the second period (Apr 2020-Feb 2022) avoiding trans-femoral artery access (TFA) as possible. We compared the patient background, surgical strategy, perioperative complications, and outcome in 46 patients who underwent MT for AIS via TFA from Apr 2022 to Dec 2022 as the first period and five patients who underwent MT for AIS via TRA from Jan 2023 to Sep 2023 as the second period. Concerning CAS, the second period included significantly more symptomatic cases, with a higher rate of edaravone use to prevent hyperperfusion and a significantly smaller sheath diameter. In the second period, CAS was performed in severe conditions; nevertheless, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of either the ratio of cases detected by postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging positive or the ratio of cases with puncture site-related complications (PSCs). Concerning MT for AIS, there were no significant differences between the two groups with the patient backgrounds. The percentage of effective reperfusion, time from puncture to recanalisation, and outcome in the second period were all non-inferior to those in the first period when conventional MT for AIS was performed. Even though we introduced d/TRA in patients with cognitive decline and inability to remain at rest during the perioperative period, we completely avoided PSCs via d/TRA. In particular, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after CAS and ischaemia-reperfusion injury or re-occlusion after MT were rare but critical perioperative complications, and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) may be used to monitor these problems. We introduced intensive evaluation by NIRS if we had time to spare.

Transradial versus transfemoral artery access in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, transradial access (TRA) for mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke has been proposed as an alternative due to potential advantages such as reduced access site complications. However, its safety and efficacy compared to the traditional transfemoral access (TFA) remain debated. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to May 15, 2024. We included all randomized controlled trials and observational studies. The primary outcome was successful recanalization, defined as achieving Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) grades 2b-3. Secondary outcomes included complete recanalization (TICI grade 3), achieving TICI 2c or higher, functional outcomes (modified Rankin Score (mRS) at discharge and 90 days, mRS 0-2 at 90 days, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at discharge, Length of hospital stay (LOS)), procedural efficiency (access-to-perfusion time, first-pass reperfusion, mean number of passes, crossover to alternate approach), and safety/survival outcomes (access site complications, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, in-hospital and 90-day mortality). This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023462293). RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 13 studies with a combined total of 4759 patients. No statistically significant difference was found between TRA and TFA for successful recanalization (RR = 1.00 [95 % CI, 0.97-1.04], P = 0.88). Analysis also showed no significant difference in favorable functional outcomes between groups (RR = 0.88, [95 % CI, 0.71-1.09], P = 0.25) with significant heterogeneity (P = 0.008, I² = 71 %), which was resolved by excluding the study of Phillips et al., 2020 (P = 0.58, I² = 0 %), then favoring TFA over TRA (RR = 0.80, [95 % CI, 0.70-0.92], P = 0.002). TFA also had a statistically significant lower risk of crossover to TRA (RR = 1.68, [95 % CI, 0.99-2.86], P = 0.05). Overall, TRA was associated with a significantly shorter length of stay (MD = -1.49, 95 % CI [-2.93 to -0.05], P = 0.04, I² = 75 %), though sensitivity analysis showed a non-significant mean difference still favoring TRA (MD = -0.59; 95 % CI: [-1.28 to -0.10], P = 0.09, I² = 0 %). There was no difference between TRA and TFA regarding complete recanalization, achieving TICI 2c or higher, procedural efficiency, functional outcomes, safety, and survival. CONCLUSION: Our updated meta-analysis demonstrates that TRA is comparable to TFA, except for a higher proportion of patients achieving mRS 0-2 at 90 days with TFA, lower crossover rates with TFA, and possibly a shorter length of stay (LOS) with TRA. Further research, particularly randomized studies, is needed to confirm these findings due to the observational nature of included studies.

Clinical study on the establishment of radio-cephalic autogenous arteriovenous fistulas in small blood vessels by multi-segment balloon dilation technique.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of dilating small blood vessels using a balloon dilation (BD) technique on the occurrence of radio-cephalic autogenous arteriovenous fistulas in terms of patency, blood flow, and vein diameter (VD). METHODS: The subjects included in this study were all patients with chronic renal failure and required radio-cephalic arteriovenous fistula surgery for the first time and had not received dialysis before. Patients with VDs <2 mm were included as study subjects. They were either assigned treatment using a BD group or a control group that received hydrostatic dilation. The differences between the 2 groups were analyzed in terms of patency, blood flow, and VD. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were enrolled in the balloon dilatation group and 20 patients in the control group. The diameters of cephalic veins (mm) of the experimental and control group were compared at various time points: immediately postoperation, 2.89 ±â€…0.42 versus 1.99 ±â€…0.28 (P < .001); 1 week later, 3.16 ±â€…0.59 versus 2.66 ±â€…0.60 (P = .022); 1 month later, 3.76 ±â€…0.91 versus 3.18 ±â€…0.83 (P = .087); and 2 months later, 4.08 ±â€…1.15 versus 3.38 ±â€…1.13 (P = .169). Brachial artery flows (mL/min) of the 2 groups at various time points were given as follows: immediately postoperation, 413.49 ±â€…145.09 versus 235.61 ±â€…87.77 (P < .001); 1 week later, 563.26 ±â€…206.83 versus 331.30 ±â€…126.78 (P < .001); 1 month later, 679.34 ±â€…218.56 versus 376.79 ±â€…156.25 (P < .001); and 2 months later, 736.31 ±â€…202.61 versus 394.60 ±â€…161.96 (P < .001). The primary patency at 1 year for the experimental group was 61.9% compared to 11.1% for the control group (P = .045). Similarly, the secondary patency rates at 1 year were 90.5% for the experimental group and 55.6% for the control group (P = .030). The results showed that the functional primary patency rate within 1 year was 57.1% versus 16.7% (P = .032), and the functional secondary patency rate within 1 year was 85.7% versus 50.0% (P = .038). CONCLUSION SUBSECTIONS: BD has obvious advantages over hydrostatic dilation for chronic renal failure patients with small veins in establishing arteriovenous fistula in terms of patency and blood flow.

Comparative Analysis of Right vs. Left Radial Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Impact on Silent Cerebral Ischemia.

Background and Objectives: Silent cerebral ischemia (SCI) is defined as a condition that can be detected by biochemical markers or cranial imaging methods but does not produce clinical symptom. This study aims both to compare the frequency of SCI in PCIs performed with right transradial access and left transradial access and to evaluate the influencing factors. Materials and Methods: A prospective, single-center study included 197 patients undergoing PCI via transradial access between November 2020 and July 2022. The patients were categorized into right radial and left radial groups. Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) values were measured and recorded before and 18 h after the procedure. A post-procedure NSE level higher than 20 ng/dL was defined as SCI. Results: SCI occurred in 60 of the 197 patients. NSE elevation was observed in 37.4% (n = 37) of the right radial group and in 23.5% (n = 23) of the left radial group (p = 0.032). Patients with SCI had higher rates of smoking (p = 0.043), presence of subclavian tortuosity (p = 0.027), and HbA1c (p = 0.031). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the level of EF (ejection fraction) (OR: 0.958 95% CI 0.920-0.998, p = 0.039), right radial preference (OR: 2.104 95% CI 1.102-3.995 p = 0.023), and smoking (OR: 2.088 95% CI 1.105-3.944, p = 0.023) were observed as independent variables of NSE elevation. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that PCI via right radial access poses a greater risk of SCI compared to left radial access. Anatomical considerations and technical challenges associated with right radial procedures and factors such as smoking and low ejection fraction contribute to this elevated risk.

Transradial and Transfemoral Approaches for Vertebral Artery Stenting: A Single-Center, Prospective, Non-Inferiority Comparison.

BACKGROUND Vertebral artery origin stenosis (VAOS) has recently gained increased attention, with endovascular treatments like stent implantation showing high success and low complication rates, although less is known about VAOS compared to carotid artery stenosis. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of transradial (TRA) and transfemoral (TFA) approaches for VAOS stent placement. MATERIAL AND METHODS We recruited a total of 102 patients undergoing vertebral artery stenting in our hospital between January 2020 and November 2022. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either radial or femoral approach for stent implantation in the vertebral artery, and the radial approach group secondary divided into 2 groups by patients' consent: ipsilateral or contralateral radial approach. The success rates of VAOS stent implantation, operation time, and postoperative hospitalization time were compared between the 3 groups. In addition, we compared the outcomes of stroke within 30 days, transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 30 days, and other indicators. RESULTS Of the 102 patients, the final success rate of stent implantation was not significantly different between the 3 groups. The time from sheath insertion to stent insertion in the ipsilateral TRA group (median time: 19 min [interquartile range (IQR): 12-24.5 min]) was significantly shorter than in the transfemoral approach (TFA) group (median time: 29 min [IQR: 21-35.5 min]) (P<0.01; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 10 min [6-14 min]). There were no statistically significant differences between the 3 groups in terms of cerebrovascular events within 1 month, and patient satisfaction and preference favored the radial approach. CONCLUSIONS The postoperative hospitalization time and operation time associated with the ipsilateral TRA were shorter, and patient acceptance and satisfaction were higher.

Feasibility, efficacy, and safety of mechanical thrombectomy via sheathless transradial access as a first-line strategy: A case series.

OBJECTIVE: Although mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is primarily performed via transfemoral access (TFA), transradial access (TRA) is a potential alternative in older patients or those with tortuous vessels. However, the small radial artery diameter restricts the use of large-bore balloon guides and aspiration catheters, a limitation that may be overcome using the sheathless technique. Thus, we aimed to explore the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of sheathless TRA-MT as a first-line treatment approach for acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: This single-center retrospective case series included patients who underwent TRA-MT as first-line treatment between September 2020 and June 2023. Per our MT protocol, TRA was not the first-line approach in cases of left anterior circulation lesions with a type 3 aortic arch. We evaluated treatment effectiveness based on the successful recanalization rate, puncture-to-recanalization time, and modified first-pass effect; access route effectiveness based on the puncture-to-first-pass time and switch-to-TFA rate; and procedure safety based on procedure-related and severe puncture site complications. RESULTS: Sheathless 8-F guide catheters were used in 68 % and large-bore aspiration catheters in 70 % of the procedures. Successful recanalization was achieved in 98 % of the patients, with a modified first-pass effect in 54 % of them. The median puncture-to-first-pass and puncture-to-recanalization times were 20.5 and 33 min, respectively. The rate of procedure-related complications was low (4 %), with no severe puncture site complications. CONCLUSION: Sheathless TRA-MT enabled the use of large-bore guide and aspiration catheters, providing a swift approach to the target and satisfactory outcomes, and might be an effective first-line treatment for acute ischemic stroke.

Computational model-based hemodynamic comparisons of traditional and modified idealized models of autologous radiocephalic fistula.

Autologous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is a commonly used vascular access (VA) for hemodialysis, and hemodynamic changes are one of the main factors for its failure. To explore the effect of geometry on the hemodynamics in the AVF, a modified model is built with a gradual and smooth turn at the anastomosis and is compared with the traditional model, which has an abrupt sharp turn at the anastomisis. Transient computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed for the comparison and analysis of the hemodynamic fields of the two models at different stages of the pulse cycle. The results showed that the low shear stress region and high oscillatory shear stress region in the modified AVF model coincided with regions of intimal hyperplasia that have been identified by previous studies. A comparison with the blood flow velocities measured in vivo was performed, and the error between the simulation results and the medical data was reduced by 22% in the modified model, which verifies the rationality and utility of the modified model.

Effect of no-touch versus conventional technique on arteriovenous fistula outcomes: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Autologous arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) are the best type of vascular access in patients with kidney failure. However, the conventional technique has a high failure rate. We performed a randomised controlled trial to investigate whether the no-touch technique has a higher maturation and patency rate than that of the conventional technique for creating AVFs. METHODS: This study was a single-centre randomised controlled trial involving patients with kidney failure requiring an AVF for haemodialysis access. A total of 179 patients undergoing their first radial artery-cephalic fistula were randomized 1:1 to the no-touch technique (n = 90) or conventional technique (n = 89). The maturation and patency rate of the two techniques were compared and analysed. RESULTS: The preoperative baseline data showed no differences between groups. When comparing the no-touch technique to the conventional technique, the maturation rate was 93% vs. 89% and the 1-year primary function patency was 72% vs. 62%, respectively. Factors associated with AVF failure included age > 55 years (OR = 2.417, 95% CI 1.242-4.703), female sex (OR = 2.149, 95% CI 1.099-4.202), and vein diameter ≤ 1.8 mm (OR = 3.664, 95% CI 1.714-7.832). For patients with small veins the maturation rate was 92.98% vs. 80% and the 1-year primary function patency was 68.42% vs. 40% for the no-touch technique and conventional technique, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The no-touch technique has a higher maturation and patency rate than the conventional technique for creating an autologous AVF, especially in patients with small veins. This technique may provide a better outcome for patients with small cephalic veins.

Distal Forearm Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation in Diabetic Hemodialysis Patients.

PURPOSE: Atherosclerotic disease of the forearm arteries can impede the maturation of distal fistulas in diabetic patients. The goal of this study was to look at the maturity of diabetic hemodialysis patients' distal forearm (radiocephalic snuffbox or distal forearm) arteriovenous fistulas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with chronic renal failure who were candidates for distal forearm radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula implantation were evaluated in this cross-sectional study. Patients' demographic details, underlying disorders, laboratory measurements, vital signs, and information on their surgery were all noted. Patients were checked for fistula development 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and then monthly until 6 months after surgery. Arteriovenous fistula maturation characterized by optimal blood flow, vessel dilation, and structural adaptations. RESULTS: Among 343 patients (56% male, 44% female, mean age: 57.32 ± 12.48 years), hypertension prevailed (81.9%), followed by hyperlipidemia (42.3%) and coronary artery disease history (25.9%). AVFs achieved 58.3% maturation in 64.98 ± 11.05 days; higher BP during creation correlated with successful maturation (17.02 ± 1.46 mmHg vs 13.90 ± 1.93 mmHg, P < .05). No significant statistical difference found in distal forearm arteriovenous fistula maturation between males (57.8%) and females (58.9%) (P > .005). However, 41.7% of AVFs failed in 18.83 ± 17.89 days. Failed AVFs exhibited lower BP during operation and failure (11.75 ± 1.86 mmHg). Kaplan-Meier analysis depicted maturation probabilities over 90 days post-surgery. CONCLUSION: Diabetes and patient sex did not affect the maturation time of distal forearm AVFs in hemodialysis patients. Increased blood pressure during and after surgery correlated with shorter maturation time.

Management of depth to achieve timely arteriovenous fistula utilization.

OBJECTIVE: Failure to achieve timely arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) utilization due to excessive depth (>6 mm) remains an ongoing concern for dialysis access. This study evaluates the outcomes of radiocephalic (RCF) and brachiocephalic (BCF) fistula elevation required for access utilization. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing first-time autologous access over 10 years was undertaken. RCF and BCF were analyzed, and cases of initial access failure due to depth alone were selected for study. Primary and staged brachio-basilic AVF were excluded. Outcomes of early thrombosis, line placement, maturation (successful progression to hemodialysis [HD), reintervention, and functional dialysis (continuous HD for 3 consecutive months) were examined. RESULTS: From January 2012 to December 2022, 1733 patients (67% female; mean age, 61 ± 14 years) underwent autologous AVF placement. Of these, 298 patients (17%) had depth-related AVF access issues (BCF, 71% and RCF, 29%). Nineteen percent of these AVFs underwent a primary balloon-assisted maturation (BAM), and 2% had side branch coil embolization before consideration for elevation. The average time to intervention for depth was 11 ± 4 weeks after primary creation. During elevation, side branch ligation occurred in 38% of cases, and 15% underwent intraoperative BAM, The pre-elevation depth was 8.2 ± 3.1 mm, and the mean post-elevation depth was 4.7 ± 2.9 mm (P = .002). Early thrombosis (<18 days) occurred in 4% of cases. There was no mortality, and the 30-day major adverse cardiac event rate was 2%, with a 30-day morbidity of 5%, which was driven by wound issues. Six percent of the AVFs underwent follow-up BAM within 3 months. Mean maturation of the AVFs was 74% ± 3% vs 72% ± 3% (P = .58) for the elevation vs no-elevation groups at 24 weeks, respectively. However, there was an increase in tunneled central line placement in pre-emptive fistula patients due to the delay in maturation (elevation, 17% vs no-elevation, 8%; P = .008). There was a mean successful access time of 6 ± 3 weeks after elevation (16 ± 4 weeks after access creation). There was a median of 2.4 secondary interventions per year after elevation compared with a median of 2.7 secondary interventions per year without elevation. Mean access functionality was 68% ± 8% vs 75% ± 8% at 3 years for the elevation vs no-elevation groups, respectively (P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: Elevation of deep BCF and RCF occurs late after placement but can be successfully achieved with low morbidity and satisfactory long-term functionality. It results in an increase in tunneled central line placement in pre-emptive fistula patients. Elevation is a valuable adjunct to AVF maturation and enhances an autologous access policy.

Radial Artery Access for Peripheral Vascular Interventions: A Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous radial artery access for lower extremity arterial interventions has increased in popularity in recent years. The purpose of this review is to summarize available data regarding its safety and efficacy. METHODS: Studies related to the use of the percutaneous radial artery access for peripheral artery intervention were identified in a search of the PubMed database. Outcomes evaluated were access complications and technical success. RESULTS: Thirteen studies that evaluated patients undergoing percutaneous radial artery access with peripheral interventions were reviewed. Several studies were able to demonstrate use of up to 8Fr sheath; however, the majority was 6Fr. Reported rates of asymptomatic radial artery occlusion ranged up to 16% and reported radial artery access site complication rate ranged from 0 to 15.6%. Technical success ranged from 74 to 98.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous radial artery access can effectively and safely be used in select patients.

[Feasibility and safety study of distal radial artery approach in emergency PCI of elderly STEMI patients].

Objective: To investigate the feasibility and safety of distal radial artery approach in emergency percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) of elderly ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) patients. Methods: This study is a cross-sectional study. Elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction who received emergency PCI at the Third Central Hospital of Tianjin from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected. They were divided into the distal radial artery group and the classic radial artery group based on the puncture location. The success rate, puncture time, surgical success rate, and surgical time of the two groups were observed; The incidence of complications in patients, including radial artery occlusion rate, radial artery spasm rate, local hematoma rate, aneurysm incidence rate were recorded. Results: There were 70 cases in the distal radial artery group, including 33 males (47.1%), aged (65.6±6.7) years old; There were 70 cases in the classic radial artery group, including 35 males (50.0%), aged (66.4±6.9) years old. There was no statistically significant difference in puncture success rate, puncture time, surgical success rate, and surgical time between the distal radial artery group and the classical radial artery group (P>0.05). The incidence of radial artery occlusion in the distal radial artery group was significantly lower than that in the classical radial artery group (1.4% vs. 8.6%, P=0.024). The postoperative compression time in the distal radial artery group was significantly shorter than that in the classical radial artery group ((291.6±10.5) min vs. (343.5±9.8) min, P=0.047). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of radial artery spasm, local hematoma, and aneurysm between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: The distal radial artery approach has a lower radial artery occlusion rate, shorter compression time, and better safety. It can be used as a new approach for emergency PCI in elderly patients with STEMI for clinical application.

Hemodynamic Monitoring In The Cardiac Surgical Patient: Comparison of Three Arterial Catheters.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic systolic (SAP) and mean (MAP) arterial pressure monitoring is the cornerstone in hemodynamic management of the cardiac surgical patient, and the radial artery is the most common site of catheter placement. The present study compared 3 different arterial line procedures. It is hypothesized that a 20-G 12.7- cm catheter inserted into the radial artery will be equal to a 20-G 12.7- cm angiocath placed in the brachial artery, and superior to a 20-G 5.00 cm angiocath placed in the radial artery. DESIGN: A prospective randomized control study was performed. SETTING: Single academic university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients ≥18 years old undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). INTERVENTIONS: After approval by the Rhode Island Hospital institutional review board, a randomized prospective control study to evaluate 3 different peripheral intraarterial catheter systems was performed: (1) Radial Short (RS): 20-G 5- cm catheter; (2) Radial Long (RL): 20-G 12- cm catheter; and (3) Brachial Long (BL): 20-G 12- cm catheter. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Gradients between central aortic and peripheral catheters (CA-P) were compared and analyzed before CPB and 2 and 10 minutes after separation from CPB. The placement of femoral arterial lines and administration of vasoactive medications were recorded. After exclusions, 67 BL, 61 RL, and 66 RS patients were compared. Before CPB, CA-P SAP and MAP gradients were not significant among the 3 groups. Two minutes after CPB, the CA-P SAP gradient was significant for the RS group (p = 0.005) and insignificant for BL (p = 0.47) and RL (p = 0.39). Two-group analysis revealed that CA-P SAP gradients are similar between BL and RL (p = 0.84), both of which were superior to RS (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively). At 10 minutes after CPB, the CA-P SAP gradient for RS remained significant (p = 0.004) and similar to the gradient at 2 minutes. The CA-P SAP gradients increased from 2 to 10 minutes for BL (p = 0.13) and RL (p = 0.06). Two minutes after CPB, the CA-P MAP gradients were significant for the BL (p = 0.003), RL (p < 0.0001), and RS (p < 0.0001) groups. Two-group analysis revealed that the CA-P MAP gradients were lower for the BL group compared with the RL (p = 0.054) and RS (p< 0.05) groups. Ten minutes after CPB, the CA-P MAP gradients in the RL and RS groups remained significant (p < 0.0001) and both greater than the BL group (p = 0.002). A femoral arterial line was placed more frequently in the RS group (8/66 = 12.1%) than in the RL group (3/61 = 4.9%) and the BL group (2/67 = 3.0%). Vasopressin was administered significantly more frequently in the RS group. CONCLUSION: Regarding CA-P SAP gradients, the RL group performed equally to the BL group, both being superior to RS. Regarding CA-P MAP gradients, BL was superior to RL and RS. Clinically, femoral line placement and vasopressin administration were fewer for the BL and RL groups when compared with the RS group. This study demonstrated the benefits of a long (12.7 cm) 20- G angiocath placed in the radial artery.

Routine preprocedural ultrasound in palpation versus ultrasound guided radial access for cardiac catheterization.

BACKGROUND: The radial first approach in cardiac catheterization is preferred for its benefits in patient comfort and recovery time. Yet, challenges persist due to characteristics like small, deep, calcified, and mobile radial arteries. Utilizing ultrasound before and during procedures can improve success rates. However, the adoption of its use is still limited and subject to debate. AIM: To utilize routine preprocedural ultrasound (US) and compare US guided with palpation guided radial access, focusing on operator efficiency and outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consenting adult patients undergoing elective radial cardiac catheterization were divided into palpation and US groups. Routine preprocedural assessment of radial artery characteristics was performed using handheld US. Baseline data, US findings, procedural outcomes, and clinical outcomes were compared in 182 participants (91 in each group). US guided radial access had significantly higher first pass success rates (76.92% vs. 49.45%, p 0.0001), fewer number of attempts (1.46 ± 1 vs. 1.99 ± 1.46, p 0.004), and shorter amount of time (93.62 ± 44.04 vs. 120.44 ± 67.1, p 0.002) compared with palpation guidance. The palpation group had significantly higher incidence of spasm (15.38% vs. 3.3%, p 0.0052). Subgroup analysis indicated consistent benefits of US guidance, especially in calcified radial arteries. CONCLUSION: This prospective, nonrandomized, single-center study demonstrated that real-time procedural US improved the operator's time and effort and enhanced patient comfort compared with palpation. US guidance use was particularly favorable in the presence of calcifications observed on baseline preoperative US.

Pull-through technique through antegrade radial artery puncture without sheath insertion in balloon-assisted radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas maturation.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the pull-through technique through antegrade radial artery puncture without sheath insertion in balloon-assisted radiocephalic AVF maturation. METHODS: We retrospective studied a total of 62 patients with immature radiocephalic AVF, who received balloon-assisted maturation in our hospital. 15 patients received pull-through technique through radial artery without sheath insertion and 47 patients received treatment through a regular venous approach. RESULTS: The success rate of pull-through technique group and control group was 86.7% (13 out of 15), 89.1% (41 out of 46) respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups (P > 0.05). In our study, there were 2 patients in the pull-through technique group and 3 patients in the control group, which had hematoma in the vein puncture site (P = 0.59). There were also no differences in the primary patency rate between two groups at 6 months and 12 months (76.9% vs 70.7%, 38.4% vs 41.5%, respectively, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The pull-through technique through antegrade radial artery without sheath insertion in promoting radiocephalic AVF maturation is effective and safe.

Neuro-Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment Using the Right Transradial Approach in Patients with Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of neurological interventions using the right transradial approach (R-TRA) in patients with aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed cases that underwent cerebral angiography and interventions at Huangpi District People's Hospital from January 2023 to July 2023. Out of 335 cases, 5 patients with ARSA were identified. RESULTS: All 5 cases underwent diagnostic cerebral angiography via R-TRA. Two of the patients received interventions via R-TRA: 1 underwent right internal carotid artery balloon dilation angioplasty, while another underwent left vertebral artery stenting. No surgery-related complications were observed during these procedures. CONCLUSIONS: R-TRA proves to be a safe and effective option for neuro-interventional surgery in patients with ARSA.

Intraoperative transit time flow measurement predicts maturation of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas.

OBJECTIVE: The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the first choice for gaining vascular access for hemodialysis. However, 20% to 50% of AVFs fail within 4 months after creation. Although demographic risk factors have been described, there is little evidence on the intraoperative predictors of AVF maturation failure. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of intraoperative transit time flow measurements (TTFMs) on AVF maturation failure. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, intraoperative blood flow, measured using TTFM, was compared with AVF maturation after 6 weeks in 55 patients. Owing to its significantly higher prevalence and risk of nonmaturation, the radiocephalic AVF (RCAVF) was the main focus of this study. A recommended cutoff point for high vs low intraoperative blood flow was determined for RCAVFs, using a receiver operating characteristic curve. RESULTS: The average intraoperative blood flow in RCAVFs was 156 mL/min. Patients with an intraoperative blood flow equal or lower than the determined cutoff point of 160 mL/min, showed a 3.03 times increased risk of AVF maturation failure after 6 weeks, compared with patients with a higher intraoperative blood flow (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative blood flow in RCAVFs measured by TTFM provides an adequate means of predicting AVF nonmaturation 6 weeks after surgery. For RCAVFs, a cutoff point for intraoperative blood flow of 160 mL/min is recommended for maximum sensitivity and specificity to predict AVF maturation failure after 6 weeks.

Transradial access for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge device: A systematic review and pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a minimally invasive endovascular treatment option for patients with cerebral aneurysms. Transradial access (TRA) is a technique that involves accessing the arterial system through the radial artery in the wrist rather than the femoral artery in the groin. Several studies have investigated the use of TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms. The databases PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. To reduce the risk of bias, this systematic review only included studies reporting on using TRA in WEB device deployment for intracranial aneurysm treatment with a minimum of four patients. RESULTS: In this systematic review, 186 patients were included across five studies, with TRA used in 183 cases analyzed. The study population had a higher proportion of females (n = 118%-69%) than males, with a mean age of 62 years old. Among the aneurysms treated, 46 were ruptured, and 119 were located at bifurcation sites, with a mean maximum diameter/width of 6.6 mm and mean height of 5.9 mm. Adjunctive coiling was used in three cases, and adjunctive stenting was used in nine cases. In two cases, conversion to a femoral artery access was necessary. CONCLUSION: The available results suggest TRA with the WEB device is a safe and effective alternative. However, using TRA versus TFA should be individualized based on patient factors and operator experience.