Complete ureteropelvic-junction disruption following renal trauma: conservative management. / Avulsión completa de la unión pieloureteral tras traumatismo renal: manejo conservador.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical exploration in complete ureteropelvic-junction disruption (CUPJD) is still recommended by many authors. Conservative approach to pediatric renal trauma (RT) includes minimally invasive techniques such as nephrostomy, angioembolization or double-J stent placement. CASE REPORT: A 14-year-old patient with CUPJD was treated conservatively. CT-scan revealed active bleeding of the renal artery and significant urine extravasation. Coil angioembolization and nephrostomy placement were performed. An attempt to place a double-J stent was unsuccessful and surgical reconstruction was scheduled. Before surgery, methylene-blue was injected through the nephrostomy observing blue urine output through urethra. Antegrade pyelogram revealed drainage from the urinoma to the ureter. A new attempt to place an internal-external double-J-stent was successful. After 5 weeks, it was removed with total restoration of the urinary tract. CONCLUSION: Complete urinary tract restoration in some cases of CUPJD following RT is possible through a nonoperative approach. It can be safe and effective, reducing the risk of complications associated with complex surgeries.

INTRODUCCION: Muchos autores siguen recomendando la exploración quirúrgica en casos de avulsión completa de la unión pieloureteral (ACUPU). El abordaje conservador del traumatismo renal (TR) pediátrico incluye técnicas mínimamente invasivas como la nefrostomía, la angioembolización o el catéter doble J. CASO CLINICO: Paciente de 14 años con ACUPU tratada de forma conservadora. El escáner reveló la presencia de una hemorragia activa en la arteria renal, además de una importante extravasación urinaria. Se practicó angioembolización con bobinas y nefrostomía. Se intentó colocar un catéter doble J, sin éxito, por lo que se programó reconstrucción quirúrgica. Antes de la cirugía, se inyectó azul de metileno a través de la nefrostomía, observándose salida de orina azul a través de la uretra. La realización de una pielografía anterógrada reveló la presencia de drenaje desde el urinoma hacia el uréter. El segundo intento de colocar un catéter doble J interno-externo sí resultó fructífero, retirándose al cabo de 5 semanas, con restauración total del tracto urinario. CONCLUSION: La restauración completa del tracto urinario en algunos casos de ACUPU tras TR es factible sin necesidad de recurrir al abordaje quirúrgico. Se trata de un proceso seguro y eficaz que disminuye el riesgo de las complicaciones propias de las cirugías complejas.

Iatrogenic Renal Artery Injury in 90 Cases: Arteriographic Findings and Outcomes after Embolization for Bleeding.

PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in arteriographic findings and outcomes after embolization among patients with a suspected iatrogenic renal arterial injury (IRAI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients at the authors' institution who underwent renal arteriography for suspected IRAIs after partial nephrectomy, biopsy, or percutaneous access over a 20-year period were included. Records, imaging, and outcomes were reviewed. Data analysis was performed using the Fisher exact or Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: Ninety arteriograms were performed on 83 patients after partial nephrectomy (n = 32), biopsy (n = 27), or percutaneous access (n = 24), including for nephrostomy/ureterostomy and stone removal. The median number of days between the index procedure and arteriogram was highest (15 days) after partial nephrectomy and lowest (5 days) after biopsy (P = .0001). Embolization was performed during 76% of arteriograms. If prearteriographic imaging showed positive results for IRAIs, embolization was performed in 67% versus 33% if imaging showed negative results (P = .005). The transfusion rate was higher after biopsy than after partial nephrectomy or percutaneous access (P = .002). Acute kidney injury after arteriogram occurred in 7% of patients; however, all returned to baseline by 1 week. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the different mechanism of IRAIs in partial nephrectomy, biopsy, and percutaneous access, arteriographic findings and outcomes were overall similar among groups. Prearteriographic imaging can help identify IRAIs but cannot supersede the clinical judgment regarding indication for embolization. IRAIs can present acutely or after a long interim, although patients who underwent biopsy presented earlier and more frequently required a blood transfusion. IRAIs can be treated with embolization without permanent deleterious effects on renal function.

Management of Renal Artery-Inferior Vena Cava Fistula Following Nephrectomy for Penetrating Trauma.

Background: Renal artery to inferior vena cava fistula is a rare event postnephrectomy. We report a case of an adult male in whom a renal artery to inferior vena cava fistula was detected on non-invasive studies following nephrectomy for penetrating trauma. Case Report: A fistula between the right renal artery and inferior vena cava was confirmed with diagnostic angiography. The fistula was successfully embolized using microcoils. Discussion: This case highlights the importance of exploring retroperitoneal hematomas secondary to penetrating trauma.

Post-Traumatic Arteriovenous Fistula of Left Renal Vessels: Case Report of a Silent Complication for 23 Years.

Abdominal trauma leads rarely to severe renal injury such as acquired arterioveinous fistula. Here, we present the case of a 46-year-old man with a history of suicide attempt by a gunshot in the abdomen. At that time, explorative laparotomy was unremarkable. He consulted 23 years later for chronic left lumbar pain and was diagnosed with an arterioveinous fistula of left renal vessels with a-10-cm aneurysm of the left renal artery. We performed a left nephrectomy and endovascular clamping was the best option to manage this giant aneurysm in a hostile abdomen.

Renal Denervation Exacerbates LPS- and Antibody-induced Acute Kidney Injury, but Protects from Pyelonephritis in Mice.

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) is an invasive intervention to treat drug-resistant arterial hypertension. Its therapeutic value is contentious. Here we examined the effects of RDN on inflammatory and infectious kidney disease models in mice. METHODS: Mice were unilaterally or bilaterally denervated, or sham operated, then three disease models were induced: nephrotoxic nephritis (NTN, a model for crescentic GN), pyelonephritis, and acute endotoxemic kidney injury (as a model for septic kidney injury). Analytical methods included measurement of renal glomerular filtration, proteinuria, flow cytometry of renal immune cells, immunofluorescence microscopy, and three-dimensional imaging of optically cleared kidney tissue by light-sheet fluorescence microscopy followed by algorithmic analysis. RESULTS: Unilateral RDN increased glomerular filtration in denervated kidneys, but decreased it in the contralateral kidneys. In the NTN model, more nephritogenic antibodies were deposited in glomeruli of denervated kidneys, resulting in stronger inflammation and injury in denervated compared with contralateral nondenervated kidneys. Also, intravenously injected LPS increased neutrophil influx and inflammation in the denervated kidneys, both after unilateral and bilateral RDN. When we induced pyelonephritis in bilaterally denervated mice, both kidneys contained less bacteria and neutrophils. In unilaterally denervated mice, pyelonephritis was attenuated and intrarenal neutrophil numbers were lower in the denervated kidneys. The nondenervated contralateral kidneys harbored more bacteria, even compared with sham-operated mice, and showed the strongest influx of neutrophils. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the increased perfusion and filtration in denervated kidneys can profoundly influence concomitant inflammatory diseases. Renal deposition of circulating nephritic material is higher, and hence antibody- and endotoxin-induced kidney injury was aggravated in mice. Pyelonephritis was attenuated in denervated murine kidneys, because the higher glomerular filtration facilitated better flushing of bacteria with the urine, at the expense of contralateral, nondenervated kidneys after unilateral denervation.

[Treatment of Renal Artery Perforation with Covered Stent after Percutaneous Biopsy of Pancreatic Head]. / Behandlung einer Nierenarterienperforation mit gecovertem Stent nach perkutaner Pankreaskopfbiopsie.

HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDING: In a 67-year-old female patient with upper abdominal pain, computed tomography showed a partly calcified swelling of the pancreatic head and wall thickening of the duodenum. EXAMINATIONS: Inpatient physical examination findings were normal. Laboratory showed increased pancreatic enzymes (amylase 210 U/l [Standard range: 28-100 U/l], lipase 2115 U/l [Standard range: 23-300 U/l]) and inflammation values (CRP 11.7 mg/l [Standard range: < 5.0 mg/l]), otherwise largely normal laboratory parameters. In the esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy, biopsy of swollen, partly stenosing mucous membrane areas in the duodenum was performed. DIAGNOSIS: Histology revealed partial erosive duodenitis, no evidence of a malignant tumor. If chronic calcifying pancreatitis was suspected, a sonographically guided percutaneous biopsy of the pancreatic head was performed to exclude a tumor. TREATMENT AND COURSE: Post-biopsy, the patient developed abdominal pain and temporary circulatory instability with nausea/vomiting and a drop in Hb to 7.5 g/dl [Standard range: 12.3-15.3 g/dl]. The sonographic suspicion of a retroperitoneal hematoma was confirmed by computed tomography. The cause was a haemorrhage from a renal artery perforation on the right side, which could be stopped by immediate angiographic intervention with a covered stent. CONCLUSION: After percutaneous biopsy, vascular perforation must always be considered. Computed tomography provides a reliable and quick diagnosis. Minimally invasive percutaneous insertion of a covered stent is the therapy of choice in the case of a renal artery accessible to stents.

Early Transplant Arteriopathy in Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Early dysfunction of renal allografts may be associated with vascular injury, which raises the specter of active rejection processes that require medical intervention. In our practice, we have encountered patients who present with delayed graft function and demonstrate a unique pattern of endothelial cell injury that raises concern for rejection in their biopsy. Therefore, we sought to systematically determine the biopsy characteristics and outcome of these patients. METHODS: During a 17-year period at the University of Washington in Seattle, United States, we identified 24 cases of a distinct arterial vasculopathy presenting in the first year posttransplantation. This early transplant arteriopathy (ETA) is characterized by endothelial cell swelling and intimal edema but without the intimal arteritis that defines vascular rejection. RESULTS: Approximately 1% of transplant biopsies during the study period showed ETA, almost all of which were in deceased donor organs (96%), and most presented with delayed graft function (54%) or increased serum creatinine (38%) soon after transplantation (median 13 days; range, 5-139). In this study, 77% of patients were managed expectantly, with only 2 patients (7.6%) subsequently developing acute vascular rejection. Except for 1 patient who died, all patients had functioning allografts at 1 year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Recognizing ETA and distinguishing it from vascular rejection is important to prevent over-treatment because most patients appear to recover allograft function rapidly with expectant management.

Epidemiology and management of isolated blunt renal artery injuries.

BACKGROUND: Isolated blunt renal artery injury (BRAI) is uncommon. Treatment options include observation, nephrectomy, surgical reconstruction and endovascular stenting. Over the last decade, there has been an increasing use of angiointervention techniques in vascular trauma. Previous studies reported underutilization of endovascular stenting in BRAI, in favor of observation. The aim of this study was to examine the epidemiology and assess changes in the management of isolated BRAI over the last decade. METHODS: Patients with BRAI identified from the National Trauma Data Bank (2016-2017). Deaths in the emergency department, transferral from outside hospital, and those with associated high-grade kidney injuries were excluded. Demographics, type of renal artery injury, and renal artery management were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with isolated BRAI. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 1,708,076 patients with blunt trauma and 873 (0.05%) of them had BRAI. After exclusions, 563 patients with isolated BRAI who met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Auto versus pedestrian mechanism and male sex were associated with the highest risk for isolated BRAI. Comorbidities, such as hypertension or diabetes, were not associated with an increased risk of BRAI. Seatbelt use had a protective effect against BRAI. In the majority of patients (534, 95%), the renal artery injury was treated with observation, 23 (4%) with nephrectomy, 5 (0.9%) with endovascular stent and 1 (0.2%) with open renal artery repair. Among the 103 patients with isolated major renal artery laceration, 91.2% were treated with observation, 7.8% with nephrectomy and 1% with stenting. CONCLUSION: Isolated blunt renal artery trauma is rare. The vast majority of patients with BRAI is managed with observation with only a small number undergoing endovascular intervention. Endovascular stenting utilization has remained very low and has not changed in the last decade.

Spontaneous rupture of a renal artery pseudoaneurysm in a hemodialysis patient: A case report.

RATIONALE: Renal artery pseudoaneurysm is a rare vascular lesion usually caused by trauma or percutaneous urological procedures. Spontaneous rupture of pseudoaneurysms without predisposing events, especially in hemodialysis patients, has rarely been reported. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 25-year-old man receiving maintenance hemodialysis visited the emergency room because of sudden severe right flank pain. He had no history of trauma or urological procedures except for a left renal biopsy to diagnose Alport syndrome 10 years prior. DIAGNOSIS: Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a right perirenal hematoma with pseudoaneurysms. INTERVENTIONS: On renal angiography, multiple pseudoaneurysms were observed in the right renal artery branches and embolization was performed. OUTCOMES: Post-angiography showed no pseudoaneurysms. His abdominal pain improved, and he was discharged 2 weeks after embolization. LESSONS: When maintenance dialysis patients complain of severe abdominal pain, spontaneous rupture of a renal pseudoaneurysm should be considered as a differential diagnosis, even if the patient has no history of trauma or previous urological procedures.

Traumatic renal artery dissection: from imaging to management.

Injury to the renal artery following blunt trauma is detected increasingly due to widespread and early use of multidetector computed tomography (CT), but optimal treatment remains controversial as no guidelines are available. This review illustrates the spectrum of imaging findings of traumatic renal artery dissection based on our experience, with the aim of understanding the physiopathology of ischaemic damage to the kidney, and the process of choosing the best therapeutic strategy (conservative, endovascular, surgical). Five main patterns of traumatic renal artery dissection are described: avulsion of renal hilum; dissection of the segmental renal branches; preocclusive main renal artery dissection; renal artery stenosis without flow limitation; thrombogenic renal artery intimal tear. In the polytrauma patient, management depends on various factors (haemodynamic status, associated lesions, time of diagnosis) rather than on the degree of renal artery stenosis. Non-operative management (NOM) is the preferred option in case of non-flow-limiting dissection of the renal artery and angio-embolisation is an important adjunct to NOM in cases of active bleeding. Embolisation of the renal artery stump may be the best option in cases of occlusive dissection, as catheter manipulation carries a high risk of vessel rupture. The therapeutic window for kidney revascularisation in cases of flow-limiting dissection of main renal artery may be variable. Endovascular stenting >4 h after trauma should be performed only if residual flow with preserved parenchymal perfusion is detected at angiography. Antiplatelet therapy administration is recommended in cases of stenting, but conditioned by the bleeding risk of the patient.

Horseshoe Kidney Blunt Trauma With Double Laceration: Endovascular Management.

A 78-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital after abdominal trauma. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan demonstrated a horseshoe kidney with a perinephric hematoma and evidence of arterial hemorrhage. An anomalous renal arterial anatomy was noted as well, with a renal artery originating from the left common iliac artery. He was successfully treated via an endovascular approach. Varying forms of vascularization may complicate angiographic treatment of patients with abdominal trauma in a setting of kidney anomalies. Obtaining and evaluating contrast-enhanced CT angiography can identify anomalous vessels and can be invaluable when deciding on the most appropriate interventional approach.

Management of Complex Traumatic Renal Artery-Inferior Vena Cava Fistula: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Renal artery-inferior vena cava (IVC) fistula is usually caused by penetrating injury to the back. However, it is a very rarely reported entity with only 20 cases reported in the literature. They may present acutely with hemodynamic instability or chronically as congestive heart failure. A thorough examination and adequate imaging are required to avoid missing such injuries. CASE PRESENTATION: A 28-year-old gentleman presented after sustaining stab injury to the back. The stab had penetrated the renal artery and IVC, leading to arteriovenous fistula. He was managed surgically, as he went into hemorrhagic shock, with a successful outcome. The case is also unique as an accessory renal artery was also involved in the fistula. CONCLUSION: Early identification and management of renal artery-IVC fistula is important to ensure a successful outcome. Such fistulas can be managed by either endovascular approach or surgical approach. The decision of approach depends on the level of expertise available and hemodynamic status of the patient.

Profile of renal artery embolization (RAE) for renal trauma: A comparison of data from two major trauma center

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate usage of renal artery embolization (RAE) for renal injuries and discuss the indications for this treatment. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was performed evaluating the electronic medical records of all patients with renal trauma admitted to two major comprehensive hospitals in Shantou city from January 2006 to December 2015. Results There were 264 and 304 renal traumatic patients admitted to hospital A and B, respectively. LGRT was the reason for presentation in the majority of patients (522, 91.9%). A total of 534 (94.0%) patients were treated conservatively. RAE was performed in 9 patients from 2012 to 2015 at hospital A, including in 6 patients (6/9, 66.7%) with LGRT, and 3 patients (3/9, 33.3%) with HGRT. No patient underwent interventional therapy (RAE) at hospital B during the same period. No significant differences in the operative rate of hospital A were observed between the two time periods (2006-2011 and 2012-2015). The operative rate for LGRT between the two hospitals from 2006 to 2011 and 2012 to 2015 was not significantly different. Hospital A showed a significant decrease in the rate of conservative treatment for patients with LGRT. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, the AAST renal grade both were significantly associated with undergoing RAE. Conclusions LGRT was present in the majority of patients, and most cases of renal trauma could be treated with conservative treatment. RAE was well utilized for the treatment of renal trauma. However, some patients with LGRT were treated with unnecessary interventional therapy.

Profile of renal artery embolization (RAE) for renal trauma: A comparison of data from two major trauma center.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate usage of renal artery embolization (RAE) for renal injuries and discuss the indications for this treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed evaluating the electronic medical records of all patients with renal trauma admitted to two major comprehensive hospitals in Shantou city from January 2006 to December 2015. RESULTS: There were 264 and 304 renal traumatic patients admitted to hospital A and B, respectively. LGRT was the reason for presentation in the majority of patients (522, 91.9%). A total of 534 (94.0%) patients were treated conservatively. RAE was performed in 9 patients from 2012 to 2015 at hospital A, including in 6 patients (6/9, 66.7%) with LGRT, and 3 patients (3/9, 33.3%) with HGRT. No patient underwent interventional therapy (RAE) at hospital B during the same period. No significant differences in the operative rate of hospital A were observed between the two time periods (2006-2011 and 2012-2015). The operative rate for LGRT between the two hospitals from 2006 to 2011 and 2012 to 2015 was not significantly different. Hospital A showed a significant decrease in the rate of conservative treatment for patients with LGRT. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, the AAST renal grade both were significantly associated with undergoing RAE. CONCLUSIONS: LGRT was present in the majority of patients, and most cases of renal trauma could be treated with conservative treatment. RAE was well utilized for the treatment of renal trauma. However, some patients with LGRT were treated with unnecessary interventional therapy.

Review and meta-analysis of renal artery damage following percutaneous renal denervation with radiofrequency renal artery ablation.

AIMS: We aimed to estimate the rate of renal artery adverse events following renal denervation with the most commonly applied radiofrequency catheter system based on a comprehensive review of published reports. METHODS AND RESULTS: We reviewed 50 published renal denervation (RDN) trials reporting on procedural safety including 5,769 subjects with 10,249 patient-years of follow-up. Twenty-six patients with renal artery stenosis or dissection (0.45%) were identified of whom 24 (0.41%) required renal artery stenting. The primary meta-analysis of all reports indicated a 0.20% pooled annual incidence rate of stent implantation (95% CI: 0.12 to 0.29% per year). Additional sensitivity analyses yielded consistent pooled estimates (range: 0.17 to 0.42% per year). Median time from RDN procedure to all renal intervention was 5.5 months (range: 0 to 33 months); 79% of all events occurred within one year of the procedure. A separate review of 14 clinical trials reporting on prospective follow-up imaging using either magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography or angiography following RDN in 511 total subjects identified just 1 new significant stenosis (0.20%) after a median of 11 months post procedure (one to 36 months). CONCLUSIONS: Renal artery reintervention following renal denervation with the most commonly applied RF renal denervation system (Symplicity) is rare. Most events were identified within one year.

Initial Experience With the Microvascular Plug in Selective Renal Artery Embolization.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the microvascular plug (MVP) for selective renal artery embolization. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed on a cohort of 6 patients undergoing renal artery embolization using the MVP between July 2015 and August 2018. Patients' demographics, indication for embolization, technical details of the embolization procedure, and clinical events were gathered from the patients' electronic medical records. RESULTS: The patients underwent selective renal artery embolization with a MVP for iatrogenic vascular injuries (n = 3), traumatic vascular injuries (n = 2), and for elective embolization of an angiomyolipoma (n = 1), in native kidneys (n = 4) or in renal allografts (n = 2). Immediate occlusion of the feeding artery was achieved with 1 MVP device in 4 patients. In 1 patient, a second MVP was needed, and in another patient, additional 0.018-inch microcoils were used to completely occlude the injured artery. Technical success was achieved in all patients. The volume of the resulting renal infarction was estimated less than 5% of the renal volume. No other procedure-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The MVP is a safe and effective device allowing superselective renal artery embolization. Therefore, we recommend the MVP as a valuable embolic in superselective renal artery embolization. Additionally, a single device is sufficient in most cases, potentially reducing the cost, duration, and radiation exposure of the procedure.

Traumatic Kidney Injury: An Observational Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Renal injuries account for 8-10% of abdominal trauma. We aimed to describe the incidence, presentation, and management of traumatic kidney injury in our institution. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted with traumatic kidney injury at a level 1 trauma center between January 2014 and December 2017. RESULTS: During a period of 3 years, a total of 152 patients with blunt renal trauma were admitted to a level 1 trauma center; 91% of these were males, with a mean age of 32.8 ± 13.7 years. Motor vehicle crashes accounted for 68% of cases, followed by fall from height (23%). Seventy-one percent of patients had associated chest injuries, 38% had pelvis injuries, and 32% had head injury. Associated abdominal injuries included the liver (35%) and spleen (26%). The mean abdominal abbreviated injury scale was 2.8 ± 1.0; and for those with severe renal injury, it was 3.9 ± 0.9. The mean injury severity score was 24.9 ± 13.7 (31.8 ± 14.2 with renal vs. 21.9 ± 12.9 without renal injury, p = 0.004). Most of the patients were treated conservatively (93%), including severe renal injuries (grades IV and V), and 7% had surgical exploration, mainly those with severe injuries (grades IV and V). The mortality rate was 11%. CONCLUSIONS: High-grade renal injuries in hemodynamically stable patients can be managed conservatively. A multidisciplinary approach coordinated by trauma, urology, and radiology services facilitates the care of these patients in our trauma center.